Search Results (6)

Introduction: Minimally invasive video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer has become a widely used approach. However, postoperative pulmonary complications (PCs) such as pneumonia, atelectasis, and lung fistula remain significant challenges, particularly in older adult patients with multiple comorbidities. The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) has been suggested as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in various surgical settings, but its relationship with postoperative complications following VATS lobectomy for lung cancer has not been thoroughly explored. The aim of this study was to determine if preoperative 6MWD predicted the occurrence of 30-day PCs among patients undergoing VATS lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods: This retrospective study examined 66 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy for lung cancer. Participants were categorized into two groups: those with postoperative pulmonary complications (n = 11) and those without (n = 55). The research period was from January to September 2022. The preoperative 6MWT distance, along with other clinical and demographic factors, was assessed to determine its predictive value for postoperative complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant predictors. Results: The study found that preoperative 6MWT ≤ 450 m was a significant predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio: 5.674, 95% CI: 1.206–26.684, p = 0.028). Conclusions: The preoperative 6MWT distance is a useful predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy for lung cancer. Patients with a 6MWT ≤ 450 m may be at higher risk for complications such as pneumonia, atelectasis, and lung fistula. Incorporating preoperative 6MWT as a risk stratification tool could help guide clinical decisions and rehabilitation efforts to improve postoperative outcomes in this patient population. Full article

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and patients with operable early-stage NSCLC are typically managed surgically. While effective, surgical resection can significantly impact pulmonary function and quality of life. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a comprehensive, multimodal approach that is an established cornerstone in the treatment of COPD. It has similarly demonstrated multiple benefits in patients with lung cancer who have undergone lobectomy or resection by improving pulmonary function, increasing exercise tolerance, improving nutritional status, providing psychological support, and enhancing quality of life. Despite this, PR for early-stage operable NSCLC is oftentimes not standardized, and challenges to adherence remain. In this review, we examine the components of PR, the role of PR in pre- and postoperative settings in patients with early-stage NSCLC, implementation strategies for PR, and future directions and challenges of PR in operable NSCLC. Full article

Worldwide, lung cancer remains the predominant cause of cancer cases and deaths and poses significant health challenges, with surgical resection being a key treatment. Post-surgery, patients often experience functional impairments. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive ICF version for assessing the functional profile and disability in lung cancer patients post-thoracic surgery undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation using the ICF and WHODAS 2.0 tool. We analyzed the correlation between the ICF Core Set and WHODAS 2.0 data to understand the impact on daily functioning. This study included 50 patients (23 F, 27 M) from the Clinic of Thoracic Surgery and Respiratory Rehabilitation in Lodz. Essential ICF codes were determined using the Delphi method, and assessments were conducted on the third day post-operation. Statistical analyses included various tests with α = 0.05. The results showed no impairments in voice functions (b310), respiration rates (b4400), and diaphragm functions (b4451), but there were significant issues with chest pain (b28011), respiratory muscle functions (b445), exercise tolerance (b455), and muscle endurance (b740). In Activities and Participation and Environmental Factors, most codes were not problematic, except for employment (d845, d850) and atmospheric pressure (e2252). Significant correlations were found between mobility limitations (d410, d460) and self-care (d510, d540) with the WHODAS 2.0 results. The comprehensive ICF Core Set effectively described the functional profile of post-surgery patients, confirming its utility and highlighting the impact of disability on daily functioning. Full article

Lung cancer often presents with pain and breathlessness, frequently necessitating surgical procedures, such as lung lobectomy. A pivotal component of postoperative care is rehabilitation, aimed not only at improving the clinical condition but also at influencing the patient’s functional profile. In a study conducted at the Clinic of Thoracic Surgery and Respiratory Rehabilitation in the Regional Multispecialist Center for Oncology and Traumatology of the Nicolaus Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz, the effectiveness of rehabilitation intervention was assessed in 50 patients (n = 27 M, n = 23 F) postlobectomy due to early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health—ICF Rehabilitation Core Set was used to evaluate the functional profile, the modified Laitinen scale for pain assessment, and the modified Borg scale for breathlessness evaluation. Additionally, lung-expansion time was monitored. The significance level of the statistical tests in this analysis was set at α = 0.05. The study employed an analysis of the normality of the distributions of the numerical variables, reporting of variable distributions, estimation of differences between groups, estimation of differences within groups, estimation of the independence of categorical variables, and regression analysis. The research confirmed that rehabilitation partially improves the functional profile of patients and reduces the sensation of breathlessness postsurgery. The study highlighted the need for future research with a larger number of participants and an extended observation period to gain a deeper understanding of the impact of rehabilitation on patients after lung lobectomy procedures. Full article

Background: Thoracic surgery is a recommended treatment option for non-small cell lung cancer patients. An important part of a patient’s therapy, which helps to prevent postoperative complications and improve quality of life, is pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). The aim of this study was to assess whether the implementation of physical activity has an influence on forced oscillation technique (FOT) values in patients after thoracic surgery due to lung cancer. Methods: In this observational study, we enrolled 54 patients after thoracic surgery due to lung cancer, 49 patients with idiopathic interstitial fibrosis (IPF), and 54 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma–COPD overlap (COPD/ACO). All patients were subjected to three weeks of in-hospital PR and assessed at the baseline as well as after completing PR by FOT, spirometry, grip strength measurement, and the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Results: We observed differences between FOT values under the influence of physical activity in studied groups, mostly between patients after thoracic surgery and COPD/ACO patients; however, no significant improvement after completing PR among FOT parameters was noticed in any group of patients. Improvements in the 6MWT distance, left hand strength, and right hand strength after PR were noticed (p < 0.001, 0.002, and 0.012, respectively). Conclusions: Three weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation had no impact on FOT values in patients after thoracic surgery due to lung cancer. Instead, we observed improvements in the 6MWT distance and the strength of both hands. Similarly, no FOT changes were observed in IPF and COPD/ACO patients after completing PR. Full article

Introduction: The procedure of lung parenchyma resection may result in impairment of physical capacity and quality of life. In patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), lobectomy is an elective procedure. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common coexisting condition in patients with NSCLC. Effectiveness of post-operative pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients who underwent lobectomy due to NSCLC and suffering from COPD as compared to individuals without COPD has not been determined yet. The aim of the study was to compare effectiveness of post-operative PR in patients with COPD after lobectomy due to NSCLC (COPD[+] L [+]) with individuals with COPD without lung parenchyma resection (COPD(+) L(–)) and those who underwent lobectomy due to NSCLC and not suffering from COPD (COPD[–] L[+]). Material and methods: Thirty-seven patients with non-small cell lung cancer (21 patients with and 16 patients without COPD) who underwent lobectomy and 29 subjects with COPD referred to the Lung Diseases Treatment and Rehabilitation Centre in Lodz in 2018–2019 were included in this retrospective analysis. The patients participated in a 3-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program which included breathing exercises, physical workout, relaxation exercises, education, psychological support and nutrition consulting. The evaluation included lung function measurements, six-minute walking test (6MWT) and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score. The results obtained before the rehabilitation were compared to those achieved after the 3-week PR program and compared between the study groups. Results: A significant increase in the distance covered during 6MWT was observed in all the three groups studied: COPD(+) L(+) (Δ = 62.52 ± 14.58 m); COPD(–) L(+) (Δ = 73.67 ± 11.58 m); and COPD(+) L(–) (Δ = 59.93 ± 10.02 m) (p < 0.001 for all). Similarly, a statistically and clinically significant improvement in the total SGRQ score was recorded: COPD(+) L(+) ∆ = –12.05 ± 3.96 points; p < 0.05 and COPD(–) L(+) ∆ = –12.30 ± 4.85 points; p < 0.01 and COPD(+) (L–) ∆= –14.07 ± 3.36 points (p < 0.001). No significant differences in the outcome improvement between the study groups were identified. Conclusions: The results of the study show that COPD(+) L(+) patients gained benefits from post-operative PR comparable to COPD(+) L(–) and COPD(–) L(+) subjects by improving their physical capacity and quality of life. Full article