Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = laparoendoscopic single-site surgery

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 2436 KB  
Systematic Review
Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Ovarian Cystectomy: A Meta-Analysis
by Greg J. Marchand, Ahmed T. Abdelsattar, Daniela Gonzalez Herrera, Mckenna Robinson, Emily Kline, Sarah Mera, Michelle Koshaba, Nidhi Pulicherla and Ali Azadi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(24), 8739; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14248739 - 10 Dec 2025
Viewed by 279
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To systematically compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for ovarian cystectomy in women with benign ovarian cysts, focusing on operative outcomes, postoperative pain, and recovery parameters. Methods: A comprehensive search [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To systematically compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for ovarian cystectomy in women with benign ovarian cysts, focusing on operative outcomes, postoperative pain, and recovery parameters. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and SCOPUS from inception to 1 June 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies directly comparing LESS with CLS for benign ovarian cystectomy (excluding adnexectomy) were included. Primary outcomes were operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative pain, and complications. Data were pooled using mean differences (MD) or risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals in fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity. Results: Nine studies (1 randomized trial, 8 observational; total n = 1368 patients: 702 LESS, 666 CLS) were included. LESS was associated with longer operative time (MD 9.42 min, 95% CI 3.47–15.37, p = 0.002) but shorter hospital stay (MD −0.26 days, 95% CI −0.39 to −0.14, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in blood loss, postoperative analgesic requirements, hemoglobin drop, or complication rates. Postoperative pain scores at 6 and 24 h were similar, although adjusted analysis suggested marginally lower pain at 24 h with LESS (MD −0.20, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Laparoendoscopic single-site ovarian cystectomy is a safe and reliable alternative to conventional multi-port laparoscopy, offering the advantage of shorter hospital stay despite slightly longer operative time, with equivalent safety profile and postoperative pain. LESS expands minimally invasive options in benign gynecologic surgery 1.1 s. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Update on Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2272 KB  
Article
Upregulation of 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase by Celecoxib to Reduce Pain After Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery (POPCORN Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Kyung Hee Han, Sunwoo Park, Seungmee Lee, Jiyeon Ham, Whasun Lim, Gwonhwa Song and Hee Seung Kim
Biomedicines 2025, 13(7), 1784; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071784 - 21 Jul 2025
Viewed by 2903
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal stretching from CO2 insufflation is a primary mechanism of pain associated with laparoscopy. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are promising anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of celecoxib on postoperative pain reduction and associated changes in peritoneal [...] Read more.
Background: Peritoneal stretching from CO2 insufflation is a primary mechanism of pain associated with laparoscopy. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are promising anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of celecoxib on postoperative pain reduction and associated changes in peritoneal gene expression after laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery for benign gynecologic disease. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, 70 patients were randomly assigned to receive either celecoxib or placebo (400 mg) 40 min before surgery. Peritoneal tissues were collected before and after CO2 insufflation. We analyzed changes in expressions of prostaglandin I2 synthase, prostaglandin E synthase (PTGES), PTGES3, aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C1, and 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (HPGD). Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores were also compared between groups. Results: A total of 62 patients completed the study: 30 in the celecoxib group and 32 in the placebo group. The mean CO2 exposure time was 60.4 min. In a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis, HPGD mRNA expression significantly increased after surgery in patients exposed to CO2 for more than 60 min. Patients treated with celecoxib showed a significantly higher rate of grade 3 expression (83.3% vs. 37.5%; p = 0.01) and a level 2 increase in HPGD expression on in situ hybridization (58.3% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.01), despite no significant difference on immunohistochemistry. Moreover, celecoxib effectively reduced NRS pain scores compared to placebo. Conclusions: In this pilot study, celecoxib appeared to reduce postoperative pain and was associated with increased HPGD mRNA expression in the peritoneal tissue of patients with prolonged CO2 exposure during LESS surgery. These exploratory findings warrant confirmation in larger trials with functional validation of HPGD expression (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03391570). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1780 KB  
Article
Learning Curve Analysis of Single-Incision Ovarian Cystectomy: Comparative Study of Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques
by Seongmin Kim, Seon-Mi Lee, Aeran Seol, Sanghoon Lee, Jae-Yun Song, Jae-Kwan Lee and Nak-Woo Lee
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(8), 785; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14080785 - 24 Jul 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1792
Abstract
Ovarian cystectomy, aimed at preserving fertility, has advanced through minimally invasive surgical techniques. This study evaluates the learning curves and surgical outcomes of three such approaches: DaVinci Robotic Single-Site (RSS), DaVinci Robotic Single-Port (RSP), and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). To analyze the learning [...] Read more.
Ovarian cystectomy, aimed at preserving fertility, has advanced through minimally invasive surgical techniques. This study evaluates the learning curves and surgical outcomes of three such approaches: DaVinci Robotic Single-Site (RSS), DaVinci Robotic Single-Port (RSP), and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). To analyze the learning curves and surgical outcomes for these techniques, providing insights into their effectiveness and proficiency development. Retrospective analysis of 104 patients with ovarian tumors, divided into RSS (n = 52), RSP (n = 22), and LESS (n = 30) groups. Metrics analyzed included age, BMI, tumor size, hemoglobin drop, operative time, docking time, console time, and tumor location. No significant differences in age, BMI, transfusion rate, hemoglobin drop, or length of stay were found among the groups. RSS had larger tumors on average, and LESS had a higher occurrence rate on the right side. LESS demonstrated the shortest operative time, while RSS and RSP had comparable times. Docking and console times did not differ significantly between RSS and RSP. RSP reached proficiency faster than RSS in docking and console times, while LESS exhibited the greatest variability in operative time. RSP offers a faster and more consistent learning curve, making it advantageous for complex procedures, whereas LESS provides shorter operative times but with higher variability. These findings are crucial for surgical training and resource allocation in medical institutions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecology: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2332 KB  
Article
Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Inguinal Herniorrhaphy: Experience of a Single Institute
by Wei-Quen Tee, Yen-Ting Wu, Hung-Jen Wang, Yao-Chi Chuang, Wei-Chia Lee, Chia-Hung Tsai, Long-Yuan Lee and Chien-Hsu Chen
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(5), 1786; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051786 - 23 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5623
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy have focused on developing the laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) procedure to improve cosmesis. Outcomes of total extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphy vary considerably because of being performed by different surgeons. We aimed to evaluate the perioperative characteristics and [...] Read more.
Background: Minimally invasive techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy have focused on developing the laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) procedure to improve cosmesis. Outcomes of total extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphy vary considerably because of being performed by different surgeons. We aimed to evaluate the perioperative characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing the LESS-TEP approach for inguinal herniorrhaphy and to determine its overall safety and effectiveness. Methods: Data of 233 patients who underwent 288 laparoendoscopic single-site total extraperitoneal approach (LESS-TEP) herniorrhaphies at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between January 2014 and July 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. We reviewed the experiences and results of LESS-TEP herniorrhaphy performed by a single surgeon (CHC) using homemade glove access and standard laparoscopic instruments with a 50 cm long 30° telescope. Results: Among 233 patients, 178 patients had unilateral hernias and 55 patients had bilateral hernias. About 32% (n = 57) of patients in the unilateral group and 29% (n = 16) of patients in the bilateral group were obese (body mass index ≥ 25). The mean operative time was 66 min for the unilateral group and 100 min for the bilateral group. Postoperative complications occurred in 27 (11%) cases, which were minor morbidities except for one mesh infection. Three (1.2%) cases were converted to open surgery. Comparison of the variables between obese and non-obese patients found no significant differences in operative times or postoperative complications. Conclusion: LESS-TEP herniorrhaphy is a safe and feasible operation with excellent cosmetic results and a low rate of complication, even in obese patients. Further large-scale prospective controlled studies and long-term analyses are needed to confirm these results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Minimal Access Surgery: Challenges in Clinical Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 540 KB  
Systematic Review
Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Gynecologic Benign Pathology: A Systematic Review of the Literature
by Gaetano Riemma, Francesca Pasanisi, Antonella Reino, Maria Cristina Solazzo and Carlo Ronsini
Medicina 2023, 59(2), 411; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020411 - 20 Feb 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3338
Abstract
Background and objectives: Total hysterectomy is one of the most common gynecologic surgical procedures and it is mainly performed for benign pathologies. The introduction of robotic single-site surgery (RSS) as an acceptable alternative to laparoendoscopic surgery combines the advantages of robotics with the [...] Read more.
Background and objectives: Total hysterectomy is one of the most common gynecologic surgical procedures and it is mainly performed for benign pathologies. The introduction of robotic single-site surgery (RSS) as an acceptable alternative to laparoendoscopic surgery combines the advantages of robotics with the aesthetic result of a single incision. This study aims to review the existing literature on a single-site robotic hysterectomy in patients with benign pathologies and verify its safety and feasibility. Materials and Methods: Following the recommendations in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, FP and AR systematically screened the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. No temporal or geographical limitation was discriminatory. Studies containing data about feasibility and safety were included. Results: From 219, only eight studies met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 212 patients were included with a mean patient age of 45.42 years old (range 28–49.5 years old) and a mean BMI of 25.74 kg/m2 (range 22–28.5 kg/m2). The mean presurgical time, including port placement and docking time, was 15.56 (range 3–30) minutes. Mean console time was reported in six studies and is 83.21 min (range 25–180 min). The mean operative time is 136.6 min (range 60–294 min) and the mean blood loss is 43.68 mL (range 15–300 mL). Only two patients in the total analyzed had intraoperative complications and no conversion to LPT occurred. The median hospital stay was 1.71 days (range 0.96–3.5 days). The postoperative complication rate was estimated at 1.4% (vaginal bleeding). Conclusions: Our review supports the safety and feasibility of robotic single-site hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Abdominal Hysterectomy on Gynecological Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1194 KB  
Article
Diagnosing and Treating Infertility via Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery versus Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery: A Retrospective Study
by Yanli Zhang, Yiping Zhu, Mengsong Sui, Xiaoming Guan and Jing Sun
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(4), 1576; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041576 - 16 Feb 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3571
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in the treatment of female infertility. Materials and methods: This study includes 174 female patients with a history of long-standing female infertility. We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients who [...] Read more.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in the treatment of female infertility. Materials and methods: This study includes 174 female patients with a history of long-standing female infertility. We retrospectively reviewed 41 patients who underwent hysterolaparoscopy (HL) via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and 133 patients who underwent laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Demographic data, operation records, and pregnancy outcomes were collected and analyzed. The deadline for postoperative follow-up was June 2022. All the included patients were followed up for at least 18 months after surgery. Results: Compared with the LESS group, the vNOTES group had a shorter postoperative bowel movement time and less pain at 4 and 12 h (p = 0.004 vs. 0.008); no differences were found in other perioperative indicators. The clinical pregnancy rates of the vNOTES and LESS groups were 87.80% and 74.43% (p = 0.073), respectively. Conclusions: vNOTES represents a new, less invasive approach for infertility diagnosis and treatment that is particularly suitable for women who have special esthetic requirements. vNOTES is safe and practical and may be an ideal choice for scarless infertility surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics & Gynecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 297 KB  
Article
Comparison between Robotic Single-Site and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy: Multicentric Analysis of Surgical Outcomes
by Barbara Gardella, Mattia Dominoni, Andrea Gritti, Liliana Mereu, Stefano Bogliolo, Marco Torella, Francesco Fanfani, Mario Malzoni, Aldina Couso, Alvaro Zapico and Ignacio Zapardiel
Medicina 2023, 59(1), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010122 - 8 Jan 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2746
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive surgery, especially the single-site approach, has demonstrated several advantages in the gynaecological setting. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of single-site hysterectomy for benign conditions between the traditional laparoendoscopic approach and robotic [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive surgery, especially the single-site approach, has demonstrated several advantages in the gynaecological setting. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of single-site hysterectomy for benign conditions between the traditional laparoendoscopic approach and robotic surgery. Materials and Methods: We consecutively enrolled 278 women between 2012 and 2019 in this multicentre trial. The patients underwent robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) or laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy (LESSH) procedures with or without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign indications. Surgical parameters and surgical outcomes were analysed. Results: There was a statistical difference between the two surgical techniques for total operative time (p = 0.001), set-up time (p = 0.013), and anaesthesia time (p = 0.001). Significant differences in intraoperative blood loss were observed (p = 0.001), but no differences were shown for blood transfusion or intraoperative or postoperative complications in the two groups. Conclusions: LESSH outperformed RSSH in terms of surgical performance and clinical outcomes, with no differences in adverse events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics and Gynecology)
9 pages, 600 KB  
Communication
Laparoendoscopic Single Site Hysterectomy: Literature Review and Procedure Description
by Liliana Mereu, Francesca Dalprà and Saverio Tateo
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(10), 2073; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102073 - 12 May 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4024
Abstract
Laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) refers to a spectrum of surgical techniques that allow the performance of laparoscopic surgery through consolidation of all ports into one surgical incision. LESS has emerged as a potentially less invasive alternative to multiport laparoscopy and in the [...] Read more.
Laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) refers to a spectrum of surgical techniques that allow the performance of laparoscopic surgery through consolidation of all ports into one surgical incision. LESS has emerged as a potentially less invasive alternative to multiport laparoscopy and in the last year in gynecology; hence, this approach has been largely applied for selective indications to perform total hysterectomy. We performed a literature review on single site hysterectomy and described indications and technique, highlighting practical problems, pointers, limitations and recent technical development as robotic assistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gynecologic Minimally Invasive Surgery: State of the Art)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop