Search Results (346)

Through textual analysis of 15 English-language articles by seven predominantly U.S.-based sex worker journalists published between 2014 and 2025 across 11 online platforms, this article examines how sex worker journalists aim to influence public opinion around anti-porn policy. Sex workers report on legislation such as the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), age-verification laws, the Stop Internet Sexual Exploitation Act (SISEA), and the Survivors of Human Trafficking Fight Back Act, maintaining that these laws cause harm to sex workers. In the process, they challenge sex work stigma perpetuated by the mainstream media and stake alternative validity claims. They also construct sex worker expertise based on their lived experience in the sex trades through new modes of address and by citing sex workers alongside other progressive organizers. This, furthermore, supports coalition building between the sex workers’ rights movement and other movements for social justice. Full article

Ecological civilization refers to the harmonious development of humanity and nature, with its core essence lying in respecting nature and rejecting “anthropocentrism”—a concept that aligns perfectly with the principles of animal protection. The protection of laboratory animals, which are most closely tied to human scientific progress, is particularly crucial. For centuries, laboratory animals have served as substitutes and models for humans, treated merely as tools. With the advancement of humanitarianism, however, the protection of laboratory animal welfare has gradually gained greater attention. China has established a system for protecting the welfare of laboratory animals through foundational laws and tiered standards, translating internationally recognized animal protection concepts—such as the “3Rs” principle and the Five Freedoms—into actionable operational requirements, thereby implementing concrete measures to safeguard the welfare of laboratory animals. However, China’s relevant standards still face issues such as insufficient enforcement and a lack of mandatory provisions. To safeguard the welfare and rights of laboratory animals, China must integrate animal welfare into the development of an ecological civilization, improve laws and regulations, strengthen talent development, promote technological innovation, and establish a comprehensive system of standards to ensure the welfare of laboratory animals. Full article

Left-handed individuals represent approximately 10% of the global population, yet most digital interfaces, interaction devices, and software workflows remain optimized for right-handed users. This asymmetry often results in reduced usability, higher cognitive load, and decreased task efficiency for left-handed users. This paper presents a comprehensive Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) investigation into ergonomic interface design tailored for left-handed users. Through an extensive literature review, ergonomic task analysis, and mixed-method evaluation involving motion tracking, Fitts’ Law modelling, and user experience surveys, the study identifies critical design limitations and proposes an ergonomically optimized interface framework. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements in accuracy, comfort, and interaction speed when left-handed-oriented adaptations are applied. The findings highlight the need for inclusive interaction paradigms and provide an evidence-based design guide for developers, interface architects, and device manufacturers seeking to support equitable accessibility in digital systems. Full article

Case law illustrates both the complexity of the regimes in England and Wales whereby children may be deprived of their liberty for welfare reasons and the inadequacy of provision to meet complex needs, which has led to a significant use of the power of the High Court to order a Deprivation of Liberty in unsuitable places. Calls have been made for legislative reform and less use of detention. Assuming human rights compliance will be a feature of a new framework, this article examines how the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), as illuminated by the comments of its expert Treaty Body, the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD Committee), provides useful material as to the contents of a suitable legislative framework. Also outlined is how the CRPD has value under the rights framework most often referenced in the UK, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Full article

Sea-level rise has its gravest effects in low-lying States and coastal communities. Yet the legal obligations engaged by those effects remain dispersed across the law of the sea, climate treaty law, international human rights law, and the general law of State responsibility. This article examines what the advisory opinions of ITLOS, the International Court of Justice, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, read together, clarify in that setting. It argues that their principal significance lies in clarifying how existing duties of prevention, cooperation, regulation, and due diligence operate across different legal regimes without effacing the legal distinctions between them. It further contends that these opinions render the law of State responsibility more workable in a context where harm accumulates over time, multiple actors contribute to it, and serious risks arise for affected persons and communities. Finally, the Kiribati–Tuvalu illustration is used to briefly show what this clarified framework can explain, and where its limits remain, in relation to the stability of maritime entitlements, continuity concerns, and the protection of persons. Full article

This article addresses the issue of administering the Sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick without the recipient’s consent, analysing it from canonical, religious, and medical perspectives in Poland. It indicates that, in accordance with the canon law of the Roman Catholic Church, it is permissible to act on the basis of a presumed request, particularly in emergency situations. At the same time, the fundamental importance of freedom of conscience and the autonomy of the human will is emphasised, as these constitute a significant limitation on pastoral intervention and are protected under Polish civil law. In conclusion, the paper argues for the necessity of maintaining the principle of proportionality between concern for spiritual welfare and respect for individual rights. The study employs an analysis and synthesis of normative and jurisprudential material. The analysis is comprehensive and multifaceted, whilst the synthesis enables the organisation and consolidation of the findings. Full article

This article critically examines Türkiye’s ongoing peace process with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). Initiated by the ruling bloc in October 2024, the process has been conducted through an illiberal approach primarily aimed at achieving negative peace. The government maintains that its central objective is to end terrorism by disarming and dissolving the PKK. At the same time, democracy, the rule of law, and human rights have been in significant decline in Türkiye. In parallel with global democratic backsliding, authoritarian practices have intensified, shaping both the structure and the substance of the peace process. Drawing on the illiberal peacebuilding literature, the article analyses the ongoing initiative through three dimensions: the governance of the process, the understanding of conflict and peace, and the political implications of the process. The article further argues that illiberal peacebuilding and authoritarianism have a reciprocal relationship in the Turkish case. While authoritarian governance shapes the conduct and substance of the peace process, the process itself may contribute to the further consolidation of authoritarian rule. This article explores whether positive and sustainable peace can be achieved through illiberal peacebuilding under conditions of deepening authoritarianism. Full article

The chronic digitalisation deficit within the construction sector induces design anomalies and human errors, leading to a severe erosion of investment profitability. This study aims to implement the automation of resource generation and validation processes, acting as a systemic safety barrier to stabilise analytical workflows. The proposed methodology relies on a Multi-Agent System (MAS) architecture embedded within the n8n environment and powered by Gemini-class language models. The framework integrates a deterministic PostgreSQL database within a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture, enabling the precise, real-time processing of Construction Law regulations. Applying Chain-of-Thought reasoning alongside structured prompt templates helped eliminate model logic drift, ensuring comprehensive result reproducibility. The deployment of this platform induced a 96% acceleration in the pre-construction phase, reducing the formulation time of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)/Critical Path Method (CPM) structures from a baseline of 480 min to an average of 20 min. The empirical data demonstrates a radical compression of operational costs (OPEX) concurrent with the marginalisation of the Human Error Probability (HEP) index to a residual level of < 1%. Ultimately, the solution drastically minimised the iterative overhead, confining the design cycle to a single execution while maintaining high level of compliance with the 7R (7 Rights) Logistics Directive. Full article

Regulatory sandboxes have evolved from specialised FinTech tools into broader mechanisms of regulatory experimentation. As artificial intelligence (AI) applications become embedded in credit decisioning, payment-fraud detection, identity verification, crypto-asset compliance, customer-facing advice and supervisory analytics, sandbox design increasingly affects how legal and institutional responsibility is allocated among regulators, participating firms, technology vendors and users. This article provides a comparative doctrinal and institutional analysis of accountability and liability in AI-related financial regulatory sandboxes. It clarifies the relevant AI modalities, distinguishes accountability (answerability and enforceability during sandbox participation) from liability (contractual, tort/product and regulatory/public law responsibility after harm), and maps framework-level safeguards across the European Union, the United Kingdom, Singapore, Norway and Hungary. The analysis does not seek to measure sandbox effectiveness empirically. Instead, it examines how publicly available legal and regulatory materials structure the allocation of duties before, during and after sandbox testing. The article shows that sandboxes generally do not operate as liability shields. Their legal significance lies in reallocating ex ante accountability duties—documentation, disclosure, monitoring, human oversight and exit planning—while preserving baseline liability rules. An Accountability and Liability Protocol is proposed to clarify roles, protect baseline consumer rights, support evidentiary traceability and connect sandbox learning to enforceable post-sandbox obligations. Full article

This article analyses the Italian Legislative Delegation Bill of 4 September 2025 (DDL 2025), which proposes the recontextualization of healthcare liability through the introduction of Article 590-septies into the Italian Criminal Code (c.p.) and the amendment of Article 590-sexies c.p. and of Articles 5 and 7 of the Gelli-Bianco Act (Law No. 24/2017). The study examines the extent to which the reform, if enacted, would produce a shift of criminal negligence liability from the individual frontline clinician towards the apex management figures of healthcare organizations—at both the corporate and hospital levels—and under what conditions such a shift would be compatible with the constitutional principle of personal criminal responsibility (Art. 27 Const.) and with the evidentiary criteria for criminally relevant omission. Adopting a doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis approach, the study formulates a falsifiable hypothesis, accompanied by four ex post verifiability indicators observable over a five-year time horizon following the possible entry into force of the provision. The analysis demonstrates how the DDL 2025 would recontextualize the notion of culpa—encompassing imperizia (lack of skill), negligenza (negligence), and imprudenza (imprudence), functionally comparable to forms of criminal negligence in common law systems—by linking fault assessment to contextual factors such as organizational deficiencies and resource scarcity. This approach would adopt a deflationary framework, establishing a distinction between avoidable human error and errors caused by systemic dysfunctions and foreshadowing a potential shift of liability towards apex management, who are required to ensure organizational models adequate to patient safety. This orientation, far from constituting a doctrinal novelty, would formalize ex lege a trajectory already established in civil and criminal case law of the Court of Cassation (Cass. No. 6386/2023, “Travaglino”), further intersecting with the administrative liability regime for organizations under Legislative Decree 231/2001. Significant interpretive challenges remain, related to the application of criminal liability criteria to the omissive conduct of healthcare managers, as well as to the contrasting international evidence on the behavioural effectiveness of medical liability reforms. The redefinition of top-management liability would therefore be configured not merely as a tool for the protection of the individual professional but as a derived constitutional guarantee of the right to health and the safety of care, pursued through formalized risk governance, the integration of incident reporting and organizational audit systems, the transition towards Enterprise Risk Management models, and the traceability of apex decision-making processes. Examples drawn from other European jurisdictions illustrate the heterogeneity of legal approaches to medical fault and frame the Italian proposal as a context-specific solution that nonetheless could contribute to the international debate on institutional and organizational accountability for patient safety. Full article

This study offers a critical re-examination of contemporary euthanasia debates through an Islamic legal lens, with particular focus on requests for euthanasia arising from psychological suffering within the context of mental disorders. Within bioethical discourse, advocates of euthanasia predominantly justify their position on the grounds of individual autonomy and the alleviation of unbearable suffering, framing it as consistent with modern medicine’s aspiration to optimize quality of life. Yet, by elevating autonomy and self-determination as supreme moral values, it risks reducing the human condition to its cognitive and volitional dimensions, thereby overlooking the existential, spiritual, and affective aspects of suffering. In contrast, Islamic law regards life as a divine trust bestowed by God. Human beings are understood as stewards—rather than absolute proprietors—of their lives and are thus accountable before God for their preservation. From this perspective, psychological pain—akin to physical pain—may serve as a means of moral refinement, spiritual purification, and divine testing. Methodologically, the study conducts a textual and analytical examination of Islamic legal sources, complemented by practical examples that illustrate how psychological suffering transforms into requests for euthanasia, thereby examining how these sources ought to be understood through concrete cases. Furthermore, the study aims to examine whether appeals to a “right to die,” grounded in experiences of psychological suffering, can find any juridical legitimacy within the framework of Islamic law. Full article

Climate change and environmental degradation are increasingly recognized as major drivers of human mobility, operating through both sudden-onset disasters and slow-onset processes such as sea-level rise, desertification and resource scarcity. Although estimates vary widely, projections suggest that millions of people may become displaced by 2050 because of climate change, predominantly within their own countries but also across international borders. This article examines the emerging phenomenon of “environmental migration” against the backdrop of international refugee law and broader human rights frameworks. It first maps the diverse environmental scenarios that trigger displacement before analyzing the existing international legal landscape. Particular attention is paid to the contested terminology surrounding “climate refugees”, “environmental migrants” and “environmentally displaced persons” and to the protection gaps that arise from current categorizations. This article argues that, while existing norms on human rights, disaster risk reduction and internal displacement offer partial safeguards, they do not provide coherent legal status or systematic protection for people displaced across borders by climate-related harms. It concludes that climate-related displacement should be addressed through a combination of evolving human rights-based climate litigation, enhanced use of existing instruments and the progressive elaboration of specific normative frameworks. Full article

The interplay between the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) is of particular importance, as children today make up around 41% of all refugees. The Refugee Convention grants subsidiary international protection for persons who have legally or de facto lost the protection of their home state because it either persecutes them or exposes them to persecution by non-state actors. The Convention contains various substantial guarantees for recognized refugees and persons seeking refugee status. However, it does not contain any explicit provision on refugee children. This is precisely where Article 22 CRC comes into play, which states that refugee children are entitled to “appropriate protection and humanitarian assistance”. The essay delineates the definition of what is meant by a “refugee child” in the light of both Article 22 CRC and Article 1A(2) of the Refugee Convention. Furthermore, it works out that Article 22 CRC can strengthen the Refugee Convention’s scant commitment to children’s rights. This is particularly evident in the CRC’s requirements for the treatment of children in asylum procedures, which are not addressed at all in the Refugee Convention. Full article

This article formulates guidelines for the transactional regulation of surrogacy in Colombia, based on a comparative analysis with the Mexican regulatory model, especially in the states of Tabasco and Sinaloa. To this end, a qualitative methodology was adopted by applying the technique of comparative law to simultaneously analyze the regulations of the focused Mexican states and the most recent (now shelved) initiative in Colombian law, identifying significant contributions to national progress in surrogacy through the theory of legal transactions, the principle of solidarity, and the right to found a family. The results show that, although Colombia had tried to progress in recognizing procreative will as the basis for filiation and has attempted regulatory adjustments to the civil registry, serious regulatory gaps persisted in the design of post-contractual mechanisms, especially regarding the prevention of human trafficking, the well-being of gestational carriers, institutional monitoring, and the guarantee of breastfeeding. The conclusions show that effective regulation should not focus exclusively on formalizing agreements between adults but should also guarantee the fundamental rights of the child from birth. In contrast, the Mexican model offers valuable tools to enrich the Colombian debate, but it also has some shortcomings that warrant revision. Therefore, this study contributes to the Colombian legislative discussion by calling for comprehensive regulation guided by the dignity of all the involved subjects and based on comparative experiences. Full article

This article investigates the housing precarity of EU migrant workers in the Dutch–German border region, focusing on the Venlo Greenport area. Drawing on documentary analysis, 28 interviews, field observations, and stakeholder engagement, it explores how local governance, market dynamics, and framing practices shape housing outcomes. While EU law guarantees free movement, housing remains excluded from the EU rights frameworks, leaving workers dependent on employer-linked or agency-controlled short-stay facilities. These arrangements—often overcrowded, surveilled, and formally temporary—become long-term solutions, producing what we term short-stay sedentarism: prolonged residence in housing designed to deny permanence. The study conceptualises the local “battleground” where municipalities, employers, housing providers, NGOs, and residents negotiate competing interests. Seven interpretive frames—nuisance/disorder, cowboys, human rights, NIMBY, shadow power, integration, and unwanted accumulation—structure these debates, legitimising certain strategies while obscuring structural deficiencies. Findings reveal that certification and enforcement, while intended to improve standards, often entrench precariousness by sustaining the short-stay model. Emerging integration-oriented policies signal a shift but remain fragile amid economic imperatives and spatial constraints. The paper argues that addressing housing precarity requires structural reforms: expanding access to regular housing, reducing employer dependency, and recognising migrant workers as long-term residents rather than temporary labour inputs. Full article