Search Results (7)

Background/Objectives: Hearing aids are essential for managing hearing loss, yet their accessibility, consistent use, and maintenance remain challenging in public healthcare systems, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as South Africa. Despite the availability of these services, many patients struggle with device utilization, resulting in suboptimal rehabilitation outcomes. This study explores patient experiences with hearing aids in South Africa’s public healthcare sector. This study aimed to (1) assess patients’ experiences with hearing aid access, including waiting times and service delivery; (2) identify challenges related to hearing aid maintenance and repairs in the public sector; (3) explore factors influencing consistent hearing aid use, including social, psychological, and practical barriers; and (4) propose strategies to enhance hearing aid provision and aftercare services in South Africa. Methods: This descriptive qualitative study was conducted at two public healthcare facilities in Johannesburg. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 15 adult hearing aid users who had received government-funded hearing aids within the past 12 months. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Participants reported long waiting periods (up to a year) for hearing aids, with poor communication regarding timelines. Challenges included difficulties adjusting to amplification, discomfort, and battery shortages, leading to inconsistent use or device abandonment. Social stigma and lack of family support further discouraged consistent use. Repair services were slow, with waiting times exceeding three months. Participants recommended decentralized battery distribution, structured follow-up appointments, improved aftercare, awareness campaigns, and mobile audiology services to improve accessibility and usability. Conclusions: While public hearing aid provision is essential for hearing rehabilitation, systemic inefficiencies, maintenance issues, and social barriers limit its impact. Strengthening aftercare services, decentralizing hearing aid distribution, and increasing public awareness could significantly improve hearing aid accessibility and adherence. Furthermore, policy interventions that incorporate tele-audiology, community-based maintenance programs, and integrated healthcare approaches are crucial in ensuring sustainable hearing healthcare outcomes. Full article

Background/Objectives: The conventional strategy for addressing age-related hearing loss is hearing aid (HA) use, yet many individuals underutilize their devices. Despite the positive effects of HA use, adherence remains low, highlighting the importance of studying associated variables. We hypothesize that better unaided speech perception in noise (SPiN) would be associated with greater perceived benefit from HAs, which, in turn, would be linked to increased HA use. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used, including 114 older adults (≥65 years) who were HA users. HA use and perceived benefit were assessed using questions 1 and 2 of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HAs), while unaided SPiN performance was measured monaurally with a speech-in-noise test. In the mediation analysis, SPiN performance was the predictor, perceived benefit the mediator, and HA use the outcome. Direct and indirect effects were evaluated using generalized structural equation modeling. Results: No significant total effect was found for the right ear. For the left ear, there was a significant indirect effect of SPiN performance on HA use through perceived benefit (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.06–1.57, p = 0.019) but no direct effect (p = 0.563). In addition, a significant total effect of left ear SPiN performance on HA use was observed (p = 0.041). Conclusions: The findings suggest that unaided SPiN performance—particularly in the left ear—may be indirectly associated with HA use through its effect on perceived benefit. These results underscore the potential value of including SPiN assessments in the HA fitting process and counseling strategies for older adults. Full article

Background/Objectives: Sensorineural hearing loss (HL) is a highly prevalent chronic health condition. It can be managed through hearing care, including the use of hearing aids (HAs). Still, a majority of individuals with HL remain undiagnosed or untreated. Virtual care delivery may support uptake and adherence to interventions. In blended care, individuals can choose interchangeably between in-person and virtual services. This study aimed to investigate how real-world individuals accessed blended hearing care (through in-person, virtual, or hybrid services), the amount of support they received, and their satisfaction with services and products. Methods: An exploratory, retrospective analysis was performed on longitudinal observational data collected through Australia’s longest-running blended hearing care model. A total of 25,058 appointment records were available, matched to HA purchase records and clinical notes where possible, as well as 916 satisfaction ratings. Results: The majority of individuals attended in-person appointments (75%); 25% were virtual or hybrid appointments. The number of appointments attended depended on how HAs were purchased (in-person, virtually, or hybrid), but all modalities were complemented by ample unscheduled email and telephone support. Of those who purchased HAs repeatedly, 49% changed preferred sales channel (in-person versus virtual) over time. Satisfaction ratings were highest for virtual services. Conclusions: This first report of real-world, longitudinal evidence on blended hearing care showed strong attendance of in-person appointments, while hybrid services—including informal; unscheduled support—may have responded to individuals’ changing needs and preferences over time. The findings offer practice-based evidence for blended care models and recommendations for further research. Full article

Background/Objectives: Adults with hearing loss demonstrate poorer overall health outcomes (e.g., physical health, cognitive functioning and wellbeing) and lower levels of physical activity/function compared to those without hearing loss. Hearing aids have the potential to improve cognitive and wellbeing factors, but there is a dearth of evidence on their impact on physical health outcomes. Evidence on the association between hearing aid provision and physical activity is mostly limited to cross-sectional studies. This research aimed to assess whether a study can be performed to identify whether the provision of hearing aids can improve physical activity. Methods: This study employed a preregistered observational (prospective cohort) study design of ten older adults (51–75 years) completed assessments at baseline and again at a six-week follow-up. The participants wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT9X) without feedback for the full duration of the study. Feasibility was determined using pre-defined criteria, including study drop-out, adherence to accelerometer use and willingness. A battery of health outcomes was also assessed at baseline and follow-up. Conclusions: Overall, this study was perceived favourably, with all participants reporting that they enjoyed taking part. Participant retention was 100%, and adherence to the wrist-worn accelerometers was “good” (70%). However, recruitment was challenging, and some participants found the accelerometers to be burdensome. Descriptive statistics for all outcome measures showed non-significant changes in the expected direction (e.g., improved physical activity, cognition and wellbeing). Although the study was well received by participants, modifications to the recruitment strategy and activity tracking procedures are necessary before future large-scale trials assessing the effectiveness of hearing aids on physical activity can be undertaken. Full article

There is a consensus among tinnitus experts to not recommend hearing aids for tinnitus patients with subclinical hearing impairment. However, this notion is arbitrary, as no previous study has compared the treatment effect of hearing aids on tinnitus distress in patients with and without clinical hearing impairment. In this article, we investigate whether tinnitus patients with clinical and subclinical hearing impairment differ in terms of tinnitus mitigation after hearing aid fitting. Twenty-seven tinnitus patients with either clinical (n = 13) or subclinical (n = 14) hearing impairment were fitted with hearing aids. All participants filled out the tinnitus functional index (TFI) before hearing aid fitting and after 3 months of hearing aid use. Clinically meaningful reductions in tinnitus distress (−13 TFI points or more) were seen in both groups, and the difference in tinnitus mitigation between tinnitus patients with clinical (mean TFI reduction = 17.0 points) and subclinical hearing impairment (mean TFI reduction = 16.9 points) was not statistically significant (p = 0.991). Group differences on the suspected confounding factors of age, sex, time since tinnitus debut, tinnitus distress (TFI score) at baseline, and treatment adherence were statistically insignificant. In light of this, we argue that clinical hearing impairment is not required to achieve meaningful tinnitus mitigation with hearing aids, and that hearing aids could be recommended for tinnitus patients with subclinical hearing impairment. Full article

Purpose: To examine the prevalence of adherence to hearing aids and determine their rejection causes. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting terms for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed an electronic search using PubMed, BVS, and Embase. Results: 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. They analyzed a total of 12,696 individuals. We observed that the most common causes for positive adherence to hearing aid use included having a higher degree of hearing loss, patients being aware of their condition, and requiring the device in their daily life. The most common causes for rejection were the lack of perceived benefits or discomfort with the use of the device. The results from the meta-analysis show a prevalence of patients who used their hearing aid of 0.623 (95% CI 0.531, 0.714). Both groups are highly heterogeneous (I2 = 99.31% in each group, p < 0.05). Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients (38%) do not use their hearing aid devices. Homogeneous multicenter studies using the same methodology are needed to analyze the causes of rejection of hearing aids. Full article

Untreated age-related sensorineural hearing loss is challenged by low adoption and adherence to hearing aids for treatment. Hearing care has evolved from traditional clinic-controlled treatment to online consumer-centered hearing care, supported by the increasingly person-centered design of hearing aid technology. Greater evidence and a more nuanced understanding of the personal need for adoption versus adherence to the use of consumer hearing care devices are required. Research considering consumer hearing aid acceptance behavior rests on behavior modification theories to guide clinical approaches to increasing hearing aid adoption and adherence. However, in the context of complex chronic health management, there may be a gap in how these theories effectively align with the needs of consumers. Similarly, market data indicates evolving consumer behavior patterns have implications for hearing care theory and implementation, particularly in terms of sustained behavior change. This essay proposes that evidence, including theory and application, be strengthened by revising basic theoretical premises of personal experience with complex chronic health, in addition to considering recent changes in commercial contexts. Full article