Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = gallbladder (GB) polyp

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 1046 KB  
Article
Comparison of the Size Measurement of Gallbladder Polyps by Three Different Radiologists in Abdominal Ultrasonography
by Kyu-Chong Lee, Jin-Kyem Kim and Dong-Kyu Kim
Tomography 2024, 10(7), 1031-1041; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography10070077 - 3 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4919
Abstract
Background: There is little information regarding the size measurement differences in gallbladder (GB) polyps performed by different radiologists on abdominal ultrasonography (US). Aim: To reveal the differences in GB polyp size measurements performed by different radiologists on abdominal US. Methods: From June to [...] Read more.
Background: There is little information regarding the size measurement differences in gallbladder (GB) polyps performed by different radiologists on abdominal ultrasonography (US). Aim: To reveal the differences in GB polyp size measurements performed by different radiologists on abdominal US. Methods: From June to September 2022, the maximum diameter of 228 GB polyps was measured twice on abdominal US by one of three radiologists (a third-year radiology resident [reader A], a radiologist with 7 years of experience in abdominal US [reader B], and an abdominal radiologist with 8 years of experience in abdominal US [reader C]). Intra-reader agreements for polyp size measurements were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Bland–Altman plot was used to visualize the differences between the first and second size measurements in each reader. Results: Reader A, reader B, and reader C evaluated 65, 77, and 86 polyps, respectively. The mean size of measured 228 GB polyps was 5.0 ± 1.9 mm. Except for the case where reader A showed moderate intra-reader agreement (0.726) for polyps with size ≤ 5 mm, all readers showed an overall high intra-reader reliability (reader A, ICC = 0.859; reader B, ICC = 0.947, reader C, ICC = 0.948), indicative of good and excellent intra-reader agreements. The 95% limit of agreement of reader A, B, and C was 1.9 mm of the mean in all three readers. Conclusions: GB polyp size measurement on abdominal US showed good or excellent intra-reader agreements. However, size changes of approximately less than 1.9 mm should be interpreted carefully because these may be within the measurement error. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Abdominal Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 5513 KB  
Review
Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound for Gallbladder Disease Diagnosis
by Kosuke Takahashi, Eisuke Ozawa, Akane Shimakura, Tomotaka Mori, Hisamitsu Miyaaki and Kazuhiko Nakao
Diagnostics 2024, 14(4), 374; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14040374 - 8 Feb 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4022
Abstract
Gallbladder (GB) disease is classified into two broad categories: GB wall-thickening and protuberant lesions, which include various lesions, such as adenomyomatosis, cholecystitis, GB polyps, and GB carcinoma. This review summarizes recent advances in the differential diagnosis of GB lesions, focusing primarily on endoscopic [...] Read more.
Gallbladder (GB) disease is classified into two broad categories: GB wall-thickening and protuberant lesions, which include various lesions, such as adenomyomatosis, cholecystitis, GB polyps, and GB carcinoma. This review summarizes recent advances in the differential diagnosis of GB lesions, focusing primarily on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and related technologies. Fundamental B-mode EUS and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) have been reported to be useful for the diagnosis of GB diseases because they can evaluate the thickening of the GB wall and protuberant lesions in detail. We also outline the current status of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for GB lesions, as there have been scattered reports on EUS-FNA in recent years. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, ranging from machine learning to deep learning, have become popular in healthcare for disease diagnosis, drug discovery, drug development, and patient risk identification. In this review, we outline the current status of AI in the diagnosis of GB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Diagnosis of Gallbladder Diseases—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 5320 KB  
Article
Rapid Identification of Benign Gallbladder Diseases Using Serum Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Combined with Multivariate Statistical Analysis
by Wubulitalifu Dawuti, Jingrui Dou, Jintian Li, Hui Liu, Hui Zhao, Li Sun, Jin Chu, Renyong Lin and Guodong Lü
Diagnostics 2023, 13(4), 619; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13040619 - 8 Feb 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2075
Abstract
In this study, we looked at the viability of utilizing serum to differentiate between gallbladder (GB) stones and GB polyps using Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), which has the potential to be a quick and accurate means of diagnosing benign GB diseases. Rapid and [...] Read more.
In this study, we looked at the viability of utilizing serum to differentiate between gallbladder (GB) stones and GB polyps using Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), which has the potential to be a quick and accurate means of diagnosing benign GB diseases. Rapid and label-free SERS was used to conduct the tests on 148 serum samples, which included those from 51 patients with GB stones, 25 patients with GB polyps and 72 healthy persons. We used an Ag colloid as a Raman spectrum enhancement substrate. In addition, we employed orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and principal component linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA) to compare and diagnose the serum SERS spectra of GB stones and GB polyps. The diagnostic results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and area under curve (AUC) values of the GB stones and GB polyps based on OPLS-DA algorithm reached 90.2%, 97.2%, 0.995 and 92.0%, 100%, 0.995, respectively. This study demonstrated an accurate and rapid means of combining serum SERS spectra with OPLS-DA to identify GB stones and GB polyps. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Optics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 9667 KB  
Review
The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Gallbladder Lesions
by Senju Hashimoto, Kazunori Nakaoka, Naoto Kawabe, Teiji Kuzuya, Kohei Funasaka, Mitsuo Nagasaka, Yoshihito Nakagawa, Ryoji Miyahara, Tomoyuki Shibata and Yoshiki Hirooka
Diagnostics 2021, 11(10), 1789; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101789 - 28 Sep 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4615
Abstract
Gallbladder (GB) diseases represent various lesions including gallstones, cholesterol polyps, adenomyomatosis, and GB carcinoma. This review aims to summarize the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the diagnosis of GB lesions. EUS provides high-resolution images that can improve the diagnosis of GB polypoid [...] Read more.
Gallbladder (GB) diseases represent various lesions including gallstones, cholesterol polyps, adenomyomatosis, and GB carcinoma. This review aims to summarize the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the diagnosis of GB lesions. EUS provides high-resolution images that can improve the diagnosis of GB polypoid lesions, GB wall thickness, and GB carcinoma staging. Contrast-enhancing agents may be useful for the differential diagnosis of GB lesions, but the evidence of their effectiveness is still limited. Thus, further studies are required in this area to establish its usefulness. EUS combined with fine-needle aspiration has played an increasing role in providing a histological diagnosis of GB tumors in addition to GB wall thickness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Diagnosis of Gallbladder Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop