Search Results (5)

This study investigates the determinants of Fraudulent Financial Reporting (FFR) in the banking sector from 2021 to 2024 by integrating the Fraud Hexagon framework within a risk and financial management perspective. Using panel data comprising 140 bank-year observations (35 banks over four years), the research applies an empirical analysis to examine six key elements—pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, arrogance, and collusion—that shape fraud risk behavior in financial institutions. The results indicate that leverage does not significantly influence fraud incentives, suggesting that financial pressure alone is insufficient to drive fraudulent reporting without weak governance structures. In contrast, factors related to ineffective monitoring, auditor switching, and director change show varying effects on FFR. The findings also reveal that CEO image does not reflect arrogance, which has no significant effect on FFR, and political connections of entities do not automatically reduce fraud risk unless supported by strong and independent governance mechanisms. The study underscores the crucial moderating role of the audit committee in enhancing financial reporting integrity. From a policy perspective, the research provides strategic insights for regulators and supervisory bodies such as the Financial Services Authority (OJK) to strengthen governance frameworks, enforce stricter disclosure requirements, and integrate fraud risk management practices into corporate oversight. Overall, this study contributes to the financial governance literature by demonstrating how effective risk management and governance alignment can reduce fraudulent reporting and improve the sustainability of the banking sector. Full article

The fraud triangle has long served as a fundamental model for understanding corporate fraud, emphasizing opportunity, pressure, and rationalization. Over time, this framework evolved with the fraud diamond, which introduced capability; the fraud pentagon, which added arrogance; and the fraud hexagon, which incorporated collusion and reshaped arrogance. Building on these developments, this study proposes a seventh dimension: the pleasure and thrill of risk-taking. This psychological factor highlights the gratification that some individuals derive from engaging in fraud as a high-stakes game. Through a qualitative analysis of five major corporate fraud cases—Société Générale, Enron, Wirecard, Parmalat, and Theranos—this study highlights the presence of this additional motivational factor. By introducing the fraud polygon, this research provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding corporate fraud’s multifaceted nature. This model has significant implications for both academic research and practical fraud prevention, offering insights into the interplay between systemic vulnerabilities and intrinsic motivations. Full article

This study intends to identify the motives that lead to increasing or fighting the fraud risk in the Financial Statements (FSs) of industrial companies whose shares are traded in regulated and unregulated markets at the Amman Stock Exchange (ASE) based on the Hexagon theory, which divides the motives for fraud into six factors. The study relied on secondary data to collect and measure the study variables by extracting them from the annual reports that were published by those companies on the website of the ASE during the period of 2012–2017. The collected data were analyzed using the logistic regression model on the SPSS program. The results confirmed that the return on assets (ROA), percentage of independent members in audit committees, and tone-related party transactions had a statistically significant relationship with predicted fraudulent FSs, where these three variables belong to pressure, opportunity, and collusion fraud motives, respectively. Thus, it is worth mentioning that this study is distinguished from previous studies that examined the issue of fraud in Jordanian companies by detecting the motives of fraud according to the Fraud Hexagon theory. Moreover, some of the fraud motives were measured using new variables such as a change in inventory, the age of auditing committee’s members, and tone-related party transactions. Full article

The purpose of this study was to examine the potential for fraudulent financial reporting using the fraud hexagon theory factors such as stimulus (financial target, financial stability, and external pressure), capability (change in director), collusion (total board of commissioners who have multiple positions), opportunity (ineffective monitoring), rationalization (auditor switching), and arrogance (frequency of the number of photos of the chief executive officer (CEO) in the annual financial statements) affect fraudulent financial reporting. The sample of this study comprises banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2017–2021, with a total sample of 215 and data processing using SPSS 25 software. The results of this study indicate that external pressure and arrogance affect fraudulent financial reporting. However, financial targets, financial stability, ineffective monitoring, auditor switching, change in director, and collusion do not affect fraudulent financial reporting. Therefore, for a company to have a system for preventing the occurrence of embezzlement, the company has to create a system of detection, monitoring, and systems review policies in the field of human resources (HR). Full article

This study aims to detect fraudulent financial reporting using hexagon fraud analysis, including seven factors: financial stability, external pressures, ineffective monitoring, auditor changes, change in director, arrogance, and collusion. The subject of this research is a public company consolidated audit report of state-owned enterprises. The existence of conflicting results, the phenomenon of fraudulent financial reporting, and limited research using the hexagon of fraud theory prompted this research to examine the factors that influence fraudulent financial reporting. The sample was selected using a sampling technique, with the criteria of state-owned enterprises listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016–2020. The method used is quantitative, and the analytical method used is logistic regression analysis. The sampling technique used was purposeful sampling, so the number of samples was 125. The results of this study indicate that financial stability and external pressures have a positive effect on fraudulent financial reporting. However, ineffective monitoring, auditor changes, change in director, arrogance, and collusion do not affect fraudulent financial reporting. Full article