Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = finding arc-length parametrizations

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 449 KB  
Article
Curvature Control for Plane Curves
by Fatma Karakus, Cristina-Liliana Pripoae and Gabriel-Teodor Pripoae
Mathematics 2025, 13(3), 328; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13030328 - 21 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1826
Abstract
We define a family of special functions (the CSI ones), which can be used to write any parameterized plane curve with polynomial curvature explicitly. These special functions generalize the Fresnel integrals, and may have an interest in their own right. We prove that [...] Read more.
We define a family of special functions (the CSI ones), which can be used to write any parameterized plane curve with polynomial curvature explicitly. These special functions generalize the Fresnel integrals, and may have an interest in their own right. We prove that any plane curve with polynomial curvature is asymptotically a pseudo-spiral. Using the CSI functions, we can approximate, locally, any plane curve; this approach provides a useful criterion for a (local) classification of plane curves. In addition, we present a new algorithm for finding an arc-length parametrization for any curve, within a prescribed degree of approximation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1143 KB  
Article
Longitudinal Analysis of Corneal Biomechanics of Suspect Keratoconus: A Prospective Case-Control Study
by Yan Huo, Xuan Chen, Ruisi Xie, Jing Li and Yan Wang
Bioengineering 2024, 11(5), 420; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11050420 - 25 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2445
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the corneal biomechanics of stable keratoconus suspects (Stable-KCS) at 1-year follow-up and compare them with those of subclinical keratoconus (SKC). Methods: This prospective case-control study included the eyes of 144 patients. Biomechanical and tomographic parameters were recorded (Corvis ST and [...] Read more.
Background: To evaluate the corneal biomechanics of stable keratoconus suspects (Stable-KCS) at 1-year follow-up and compare them with those of subclinical keratoconus (SKC). Methods: This prospective case-control study included the eyes of 144 patients. Biomechanical and tomographic parameters were recorded (Corvis ST and Pentacam). Patients without clinical signs of keratoconus in both eyes but suspicious tomography findings were included in the Stable-KCS group (n = 72). Longitudinal follow-up was used to evaluate Stable-KCS changes. Unilateral keratoconus contralateral eyes with suspicious tomography were included in the SKC group (n = 72). T-tests and non-parametric tests were used for comparison. Multivariate general linear models were used to adjust for confounding factors for further analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the distinguishability. Results: The biomechanical and tomographic parameters of Stable-KCS showed no progression during the follow-up time (13.19 ± 2.41 months, p > 0.05). Fifteen biomechanical parameters and the Stress–Strain Index (SSI) differed between the two groups (p < 0.016). The A1 dArc length showed the strongest distinguishing ability (area under the ROC = 0.888) between Stable-KCS and SKC, with 90.28% sensitivity and 77.78% specificity at the cut-off value of −0.0175. Conclusions: The A1 dArc length could distinguish between Stable-KCS and SKC, indicating the need to focus on changes in the A1 dArc length for keratoconus suspects during the follow-up period. Although both have abnormalities on tomography, the corneal biomechanics and SSI of Stable-KCS were stronger than those of SKC, which may explain the lack of progression of Stable-KCS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ophthalmic Engineering: Second Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 6819 KB  
Article
Assessment of the Thermo-Hydraulic Efficiency of an Indoor-Designed Jet Impingement Solar Thermal Collector Roughened with Single Discrete Arc-Shaped Ribs
by Raj Kumar, Erdem Cuce, Sushil Kumar, Sashank Thapa, Paras Gupta, Bhaskar Goel, C. Ahamed Saleel and Saboor Shaik
Sustainability 2022, 14(6), 3527; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063527 - 17 Mar 2022
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 3210
Abstract
This study illustrates the impact of single discrete arc-shaped ribs (SDASR)-type artificial roughness on the performance of a jet impingement solar thermal collector (JISTC). The impact of parametric variations of SDASR on the Nusselt number (Nusdr), [...] Read more.
This study illustrates the impact of single discrete arc-shaped ribs (SDASR)-type artificial roughness on the performance of a jet impingement solar thermal collector (JISTC). The impact of parametric variations of SDASR on the Nusselt number (Nusdr), friction factor (fsdr), and thermohydraulic performance (ηsdr) is examined. The spacer length (Ssdr) of the SDASR was changed from 0 mm to 300 mm in stages of 100 mm during the experiment. The fixed parameters of the SDASR were a relative discrete distance Dd/Lv of 0.67, relative discrete width gw/Hr of 0.87, relative rib height Hr/H of 0.047, relative rib pitch Pr/H of 1.7, angle of an arc αsdr of 60°, jet diameter ratio Dj/Dhy of 0.065, streamwise pitch ratio X/Dhy of 1.72, and spanwise pitch ratio  Y/Dhy of 0.82. The Reynolds number Re was altered from 3000 to 19,000. The Nusdr and fsdr  of a JISTC with a roughened absorber plate was found to be enhanced by 5.25 and 5.98 times as compared to an STC without artificial roughness. The optimal findings of Nusdr, fsdr, and ηsdr were achieved at Ssdr = 0 mm. The maximum value of the ηsdr obtained at Ssdr = 0 mm was 2.9. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Conversion and Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop