Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = fetal fraction screening test

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 1072 KiB  
Article
Advancing Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening: A Targeted 1069-Gene Panel for Comprehensive Detection of Monogenic Disorders and Copy Number Variations
by Roberto Sirica, Alessandro Ottaiano, Luigi D’Amore, Monica Ianniello, Nadia Petrillo, Raffaella Ruggiero, Rosa Castiello, Alessio Mori, Eloisa Evangelista, Luigia De Falco, Mariachiara Santorsola, Michele Misasi, Giovanni Savarese and Antonio Fico
Genes 2025, 16(4), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16040427 - 2 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1409
Abstract
We introduce an innovative, non-invasive prenatal screening approach for detecting fetal monogenic alterations and copy number variations (CNVs) from maternal blood. Method: Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted from maternal peripheral blood and processed using the VeriSeq NIPT Solution (Illumina, San Diego, CA, [...] Read more.
We introduce an innovative, non-invasive prenatal screening approach for detecting fetal monogenic alterations and copy number variations (CNVs) from maternal blood. Method: Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted from maternal peripheral blood and processed using the VeriSeq NIPT Solution (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), with shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) performed on a NextSeq550Dx (Illumina). A customized gene panel and bioinformatics tool, named the “VERA Revolution”, were developed to detect variants and CNVs in cfDNA samples. Results were compared with genomic DNA (gDNA) extracted from fetal samples, including amniotic fluid and chorionic villus sampling and buccal swabs. Results: The study included pregnant women with gestational ages from 10 + 3 to 15 + 2 weeks (mean: 12.1 weeks). The fetal fraction (FF), a crucial measure of cfDNA test reliability, ranged from 5% to 20%, ensuring adequate DNA amount for analysis. Among 36 families tested, 14 showed a wild-type genotype. Identified variants included two deletions (22q11.2, and 4p16.3), two duplications (16p13 and 5p15), and eighteen single-nucleotide variants (one in CFTR, three in GJB2, three in PAH, one in RIT1, one in DHCR7, one in TCOF1, one in ABCA4, one in MYBPC3, one in MCCC2, two in GBA1 and three in PTPN11). Significant concordance was found between our panel results and prenatal/postnatal genetic profiles. Conclusions: The “VERA Revolution” test highlights advancements in prenatal genomic screening, offering potential improvements in prenatal care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Technologies and Resources for Genetics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 213 KiB  
Article
Early Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing at 6–9 Weeks of Gestation
by Alexandros Katrachouras, Harry Kontos, Kyriacos Konis, Chara Skentou and George Makrydimas
Genes 2024, 15(7), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070895 - 8 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4675
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is usually performed beyond 10 weeks of gestation, because earlier in pregnancy, the fetal fraction is low, resulting in failure to obtain reliable results. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of NIPT earlier in pregnancy using a [...] Read more.
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is usually performed beyond 10 weeks of gestation, because earlier in pregnancy, the fetal fraction is low, resulting in failure to obtain reliable results. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of NIPT earlier in pregnancy using a method for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis that eliminates the need for polymerase chain reaction (PCR), DNA sequencing, or microarrays (Vanadis® system, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Cell-free DNA was extracted from the maternal plasma of 30 singleton pregnancies at 6–9 weeks of gestation (group 1) and at 11–14 weeks of gestation of the same patients (group 2). The mean crown-rump length (CRL) and gestational age in group A was 16.12 mm and that in group B was 61.45 mm. In group A, results were obtained in all, but one, cases (97%). From the remaining pregnancies, one miscarried at 8 weeks and, therefore, the follow-up NIPT at 12 weeks could not be performed. The fetal sex was diagnosed correctly in the 28 cases that had a successful early test, and the results were in accordance with the examination at 12 weeks. There were no cases of aneuploidies and disomy was diagnosed correctly in all. The “Vanadis” prenatal NIPT assay can successfully be used early during the first trimester at 6–9 weeks of gestation (early NIPT) to identify the fetal sex. Further studies are needed to explore the diagnostic potential for aneuploidies. Full article
11 pages, 238 KiB  
Article
The Association between Low Fetal Fraction of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes for Placental Compromise
by Soo-Hyun Kim, You-Mi Hong, Ji-Eun Park, Sung-Shin Shim, Hee-Jin Park, Yeon-Kyung Cho, June-Seek Choi, Joong-Sik Shin, Hyun-Mee Ryu, Moon-Young Kim, Dong-Hyun Cha and You-Jung Han
Diagnostics 2024, 14(10), 1020; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101020 - 15 May 2024
Viewed by 2924
Abstract
(1) Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a screening test for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free fetal DNA. The fetal fragments (FF) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are derived from apoptotic trophoblast of the placenta. The level of fetal cfDNA is known to be influenced [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a screening test for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free fetal DNA. The fetal fragments (FF) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are derived from apoptotic trophoblast of the placenta. The level of fetal cfDNA is known to be influenced by gestational age, multiple pregnancies, maternal weight, and height. (2) Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective observational study which examines the relationship between the fetal fraction (FF) of cell-free DNA in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies. A total of 1393 samples were collected between 10 weeks and 6 days, and 25 weeks and 3 days of gestation. (3) Results: Hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) occurred more frequently in the low FF group than the normal FF group (5.17% vs. 1.91%, p = 0.001). Although the rates of small for gestational age (SGA) and placental abruption did not significantly differ between groups, the composite outcome was significantly higher in the low FF group (7.76% vs. 3.64%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, women who later experienced complications such as HDP or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) had significantly lower plasma FF levels compared to those without complications (p < 0.001). After adjustments, the low FF group exhibited a significantly higher likelihood of placental compromise (adjusted odds ratio: 1.946). (4) Conclusions: Low FF in NIPT during the first and early second trimesters is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly HDP, suggesting its potential as a predictive marker for such outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Maternal–Fetal Medicine)
12 pages, 1369 KiB  
Article
Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening Analysis in Korean Pregnant Women: Six Years of Experience and a Retrospective Study of 9327 Patients Analyzed from 2017 to 2022
by Ji Eun Park, Kyung Min Kang, Hyunjin Kim, Hee Yeon Jang, Minyeon Go, So Hyun Yang, Daeun Jeong, Hyeonmin Jeong, Jong Chul Kim, Seo Young Lim, Dong Hyun Cha and Sung Han Shim
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(10), 1468; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13101468 - 6 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1858
Abstract
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for normal fetal aneuploidy has been widely adopted worldwide due to its convenience, non-invasiveness, and high positive predictive rate. We retrospectively evaluated 9327 Korean women with single pregnancies who underwent a non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) to investigate how various [...] Read more.
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for normal fetal aneuploidy has been widely adopted worldwide due to its convenience, non-invasiveness, and high positive predictive rate. We retrospectively evaluated 9327 Korean women with single pregnancies who underwent a non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) to investigate how various factors such as maternal weight, age, and the method of conception affect the fetal fraction (FF). The average FF was 9.15 ± 3.31%, which decreased significantly as the maternal body mass index (BMI) increased (p < 0.001). The highly obese group showed a ‘no-call’ rate of 8.01%, which is higher than that of the normal weight group (0.33%). The FF was 8.74 ± 3.20% when mothers were in their 40s, and lower than that when in their 30s (9.23 ± 3.34, p < 0.001) and in the natural pregnancy group (9.31% ± 3.33). The FF of male fetuses was observed to be approximately 2.76% higher on average than that of female fetuses. As the gestational age increased, there was no significant increase in the fraction of fetuses up to 21 weeks compared to that at 10–12 weeks, and a significant increase was observed in the case of 21 weeks or more. The FFs in the NIPT high-risk result group compared to that in the low-risk group were not significantly different (p = 0.62). In conclusion, BMI was the factor most associated with the fetal fraction. Although the NIPT is a highly prevalent method in prenatal analysis, factors affecting the fetal fraction should be thoroughly analyzed to obtain more accurate results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Methodology, Drug and Device Discovery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 654 KiB  
Article
Maternal Copy Number Imbalances in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Do They Matter?
by Michaela Hyblova, Andrej Gnip, Marcel Kucharik, Jaroslav Budis, Martina Sekelska and Gabriel Minarik
Diagnostics 2022, 12(12), 3056; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123056 - 6 Dec 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3652
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has become a routine practice in screening for common aneuploidies of chromosomes 21, 18, and 13 and gonosomes X and Y in fetuses worldwide since 2015 and has even expanded to include smaller subchromosomal events. In fact, the fetal [...] Read more.
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has become a routine practice in screening for common aneuploidies of chromosomes 21, 18, and 13 and gonosomes X and Y in fetuses worldwide since 2015 and has even expanded to include smaller subchromosomal events. In fact, the fetal fraction represents only a small proportion of cell-free DNA on a predominant background of maternal DNA. Unlike fetal findings that have to be confirmed using invasive testing, it has been well documented that NIPT provides information on maternal mosaicism, occult malignancies, and hidden health conditions due to copy number variations (CNVs) with diagnostic resolution. Although large duplications or deletions associated with certain medical conditions or syndromes are usually well recognized and easy to interpret, very little is known about small, relatively common copy number variations on the order of a few hundred kilobases and their potential impact on human health. We analyzed data from 6422 NIPT patient samples with a CNV detection resolution of 200 kb for the maternal genome and identified 942 distinct CNVs; 328 occurred repeatedly. We defined them as multiple occurring variants (MOVs). We scrutinized the most common ones, compared them with frequencies in the gnomAD SVs v2.1, dbVar, and DGV population databases, and analyzed them with an emphasis on genomic content and potential association with specific phenotypes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prenatal Diagnosis: Current Trends and Future Directions)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 1670 KiB  
Article
Genetic Counseling and Management: The First Study to Report NIPT Findings in a Romanian Population
by Cristina Gug, Ioana Mozos, Adrian Ratiu, Anca Tudor, Eusebiu Vlad Gorduza, Lavinia Caba, Miruna Gug, Catalina Cojocariu, Cristian Furau, Gheorghe Furau, Monica Adriana Vaida and Dorina Stoicanescu
Medicina 2022, 58(1), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010079 - 5 Jan 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4456
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been confirmed as the most accurate screening test for trisomies 21, 18, 13, sex chromosomes aneuploidies and several microdeletions. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of cell free DNA testing based on low-level [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been confirmed as the most accurate screening test for trisomies 21, 18, 13, sex chromosomes aneuploidies and several microdeletions. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of cell free DNA testing based on low-level whole-genome sequencing to screen for these chromosomal abnormalities and to evaluate the clinical performance of NIPT. Materials and Methods: 380 consecutive cases from a single genetic center, from Western Romania were included in this retrospective study. Cell-free nucleic acid extraction from maternal blood, DNA sequencing and analysis of sequenced regions were performed by BGI Hong Kong and Invitae USA to determine the risk of specific fetal chromosomal abnormalities. In high-risk cases the results were checked by direct analysis of fetal cells obtained by invasive methods: 6 chorionic villus sampling and 10 amniocenteses followed by combinations of QF-PCR, karyotyping and aCGH. Results: NIPT results indicated low risk in 95.76% of cases and high risk in 4.23%. Seven aneuploidies and one microdeletion were confirmed, the other results were found to be a false-positive. A gestational age of up to 22 weeks had no influence on fetal fraction. There were no significant differences in fetal fraction across the high and low risk groups. Conclusions: This is the first study in Romania to report the NIPT results. The confirmation rate was higher for autosomal aneuploidies compared to sex chromosome aneuploidies and microdeletions. All cases at risk for trisomy 21 were confirmed. Only one large fetal microdeletion detected by NIPT has been confirmed. False positive NIPT results, not confirmed by invasive methods, led to the decision to continue the pregnancy. The main limitation of the study is the small number of patients included. NIPT can be used as a screening method for all pregnancies, but in high-risk cases, an invasive confirmation test was performed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Prenatal Medicine: Research and Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 863 KiB  
Perspective
Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges
by Luigi Carbone, Federica Cariati, Laura Sarno, Alessandro Conforti, Francesca Bagnulo, Ida Strina, Lucio Pastore, Giuseppe Maria Maruotti and Carlo Alviggi
Genes 2021, 12(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12010015 - 24 Dec 2020
Cited by 65 | Viewed by 14942
Abstract
Fetal aneuploidies are among the most common causes of miscarriages, perinatal mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment. During the last 70 years, many efforts have been made in order to improve prenatal diagnosis and prenatal screening of these conditions. Recently, the use of cell-free fetal [...] Read more.
Fetal aneuploidies are among the most common causes of miscarriages, perinatal mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment. During the last 70 years, many efforts have been made in order to improve prenatal diagnosis and prenatal screening of these conditions. Recently, the use of cell-free fetal DNA (cff-DNA) testing has been increasingly used in different countries, representing an opportunity for non-invasive prenatal screening of pregnant women. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the state of the art and the main strengths and limitations of this test for prenatal screening of fetal aneuploidies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Genomics of Reproductive Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 671 KiB  
Article
Cell-Free DNA in the Investigation of Miscarriage
by Emily Colley, Adam J. Devall, Helen Williams, Susan Hamilton, Paul Smith, Neil V. Morgan, Siobhan Quenby, Arri Coomarasamy and Stephanie Allen
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(11), 3428; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113428 - 26 Oct 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3763
Abstract
Approximately one in four pregnancies result in pregnancy loss, and ~50% of these miscarriages are caused by chromosomal abnormalities. Genetic investigations are recommended after three consecutive miscarriages on products of conception (POC) tissue. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been utilised for prenatal screening, but [...] Read more.
Approximately one in four pregnancies result in pregnancy loss, and ~50% of these miscarriages are caused by chromosomal abnormalities. Genetic investigations are recommended after three consecutive miscarriages on products of conception (POC) tissue. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been utilised for prenatal screening, but very little work has been carried out in nonviable pregnancies. We investigated the use of cfDNA from maternal blood to identify chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage. One hundred and two blood samples from women experiencing a first trimester miscarriage were collected and stored. The mean gestational age was 7.1 weeks (range: 5–11 weeks). In this research, samples without a genetic test result from POC were not analysed. CfDNA was extracted and analysed using a modified commercial genome-wide non-invasive prenatal test. No results were provided to the patient. In 57 samples, cytogenetic results from POC analysis were available. Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 47% (27/57) of POC analyses, and cfDNA analysis correctly identified 59% (16/27) of these. In total, 75% (43/57) of results were correctly identified. The average cfDNA fetal fraction was 6% (2–19%). In conclusion, cfDNA can be used to detect chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages where the ‘fetal fraction’ is high enough; however, more studies are required to identify variables that can affect the overall results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop