Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = diagnostic peritoneal aspirate

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
8 pages, 832 KiB  
Article
Can We Trust Them? FAST and DPA in Assessing Unstable Patients Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma
by Rakesh Quinn, Jeremy Hsu and Tony Pang
Surgeries 2024, 5(3), 674-681; https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5030053 - 16 Aug 2024
Viewed by 2440
Abstract
The diagnosis of intra-abdominal exsanguination in hemodynamically unstable blunt trauma patients is almost universally determined by Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST). However, FAST has been reported to have poor sensitivity and is therefore associated with false-negative examinations. Our institutional practice includes [...] Read more.
The diagnosis of intra-abdominal exsanguination in hemodynamically unstable blunt trauma patients is almost universally determined by Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST). However, FAST has been reported to have poor sensitivity and is therefore associated with false-negative examinations. Our institutional practice includes diagnostic peritoneal aspirate (DPA) following two negative FASTs to address the poor sensitivity. We hypothesized that serial FAST alone would be able to exclude clinically significant abdominal bleeding in an unstable blunt trauma patient. A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2018 and 2020 at a major tertiary trauma referral hospital, including all blunt trauma patients who were hemodynamically unstable. Two groups were analyzed: 1. “FAST+”: those who had a positive FAST scan and proceeded to a trauma laparotomy, and 2. “DPA”: those who had serial negative FAST scans and proceeded to DPA. Of the 12 patients in the FAST+ group, 92% correctly identified the abdomen as the source of instability. Of the seventeen patients in the DPA group, only two (12%) had positive DPA. Both patients underwent laparotomies, but neither identified an abdominal source of hemodynamic instability. The most common cause of hemodynamic instability in the DPA group was pelvic bleeding from major pelvic ring disruption. The sensitivity and specificity of the serial FAST exam for clinically significant abdominal bleeding were 100% and 94%, respectively. These data suggests that two sequential negative FAST scans are adequate for excluding intra-abdominal bleeding as the source of instability, with further investigation with DPA not identifying any clinically significant sources of intra-abdominal bleeding. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

103 pages, 12443 KiB  
Review
Feline Infectious Peritonitis: European Advisory Board on Cat Diseases Guidelines
by Séverine Tasker, Diane D. Addie, Herman Egberink, Regina Hofmann-Lehmann, Margaret J. Hosie, Uwe Truyen, Sándor Belák, Corine Boucraut-Baralon, Tadeusz Frymus, Albert Lloret, Fulvio Marsilio, Maria Grazia Pennisi, Etienne Thiry, Karin Möstl and Katrin Hartmann
Viruses 2023, 15(9), 1847; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15091847 - 31 Aug 2023
Cited by 40 | Viewed by 24250
Abstract
Feline coronavirus (FCoV) is a ubiquitous RNA virus of cats, which is transmitted faeco-orally. In these guidelines, the European Advisory Board on Cat Diseases (ABCD) presents a comprehensive review of feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). FCoV is primarily an enteric virus and most infections [...] Read more.
Feline coronavirus (FCoV) is a ubiquitous RNA virus of cats, which is transmitted faeco-orally. In these guidelines, the European Advisory Board on Cat Diseases (ABCD) presents a comprehensive review of feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). FCoV is primarily an enteric virus and most infections do not cause clinical signs, or result in only enteritis, but a small proportion of FCoV-infected cats develop FIP. The pathology in FIP comprises a perivascular phlebitis that can affect any organ. Cats under two years old are most frequently affected by FIP. Most cats present with fever, anorexia, and weight loss; many have effusions, and some have ocular and/or neurological signs. Making a diagnosis is complex and ABCD FIP Diagnostic Approach Tools are available to aid veterinarians. Sampling an effusion, when present, for cytology, biochemistry, and FCoV RNA or FCoV antigen detection is very useful diagnostically. In the absence of an effusion, fine-needle aspirates from affected organs for cytology and FCoV RNA or FCoV antigen detection are helpful. Definitive diagnosis usually requires histopathology with FCoV antigen detection. Antiviral treatments now enable recovery in many cases from this previously fatal disease; nucleoside analogues (e.g., oral GS-441524) are very effective, although they are not available in all countries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viral Infections in Companion Animals: Volume 2)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1419 KiB  
Article
Detection of Feline Coronavirus Variants in Cats without Feline Infectious Peritonitis
by Stéphanie Jähne, Sandra Felten, Michèle Bergmann, Katharina Erber, Kaspar Matiasek, Marina L. Meli, Regina Hofmann-Lehmann and Katrin Hartmann
Viruses 2022, 14(8), 1671; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081671 - 29 Jul 2022
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 5216
Abstract
(1) Background: This study aimed to detect feline coronavirus (FCoV) and characterize spike (S) gene mutation profiles in cats suffering from diseases other than feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) using commercial real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and reevaluating results by sequencing. (2) [...] Read more.
(1) Background: This study aimed to detect feline coronavirus (FCoV) and characterize spike (S) gene mutation profiles in cats suffering from diseases other than feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) using commercial real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and reevaluating results by sequencing. (2) Methods: In 87 cats in which FIP was excluded by histopathology and immunohistochemistry, FCoV 7b gene and S gene mutation RT-qPCR was performed prospectively on incisional biopsies and fine-needle aspirates of different organs, body fluids, and feces. Samples positive for S gene mutations or mixed FCoV underwent sequencing. (3) Results: In 21/87 cats, FCoV RNA was detectable. S gene mutations were detected by commercial RT-qPCR (and a diagnostic algorithm that was used at the time of sample submission) in at least one sample in 14/21 cats (66.7%), with only mutated FCoV in 2/21, only mixed in 1/21, and different results in 11/21 cats; in the remaining 7/21 cats, RNA load was too low to differentiate. However, sequencing of 8 tissue samples and 8 fecal samples of 9 cats did not confirm mutated FCoV in any of the FCoV RNA-positive cats without FIP. (4) Conclusions: Sequencing results did not confirm results of the commercial S gene mutation RT-qPCR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feline Viruses and Viral Diseases 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop