Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (25)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = deprescription

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 630 KiB  
Article
Real-World Analysis of Short-Term Effectiveness of Oral Semaglutide: Impact on Glycometabolic Control and Cardiovascular Risk
by Sara Palazzi, Federica Sentinelli, Antonella Zugaro, Sara Morgante, Livia Santarelli, Sandra Melanzi, Annamaria De Mutiis, Deamaria Piersanti, Barbara Macerola, Marco Iezzi, Pietro Mercuri, Alessandro Ferranti, Daniele Tienforti, Maria Gisella Cavallo, Arcangelo Barbonetti and Marco Giorgio Baroni
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(6), 856; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18060856 - 8 Jun 2025
Viewed by 927
Abstract
Background: Oral semaglutide, a GLP1-receptor agonist (GLP1-RA), shows promise in efficacy and compliance, especially amid the global shortage of injectable GLP-1 RAs. Its short-term effectiveness remains unexplored. Objective: This real-world observational study assessed the short-term effectiveness of oral semaglutide after three [...] Read more.
Background: Oral semaglutide, a GLP1-receptor agonist (GLP1-RA), shows promise in efficacy and compliance, especially amid the global shortage of injectable GLP-1 RAs. Its short-term effectiveness remains unexplored. Objective: This real-world observational study assessed the short-term effectiveness of oral semaglutide after three months of therapy. Methods: Patients with type 2 diabetes from four Italian diabetes centers, who received an initial prescription of oral semaglutide, were reassessed after three months. Primary outcomes included glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight reduction; secondary outcomes involved changes in lipid parameters and cardiovascular risk. Results: Among 167 participants (mean age 66.5 years, mostly obese, baseline HbA1c 8.4% ± 1.5), 83.2% received a 7 mg dose. After three months, HbA1c significantly declined (8.4% to 7.1%, −1.3%, p < 0.001), alongside body mass index (BMI) (30.9 kg/m2 to 29.6 kg/m2, p < 0.0001). The target HbA1c ≤ 7% was achieved by 54.5%, and 34.7% reached ≤6.5%. Patients losing >5% of their initial weight (30.5%) saw the largest HbA1c drop (−1.9%). Those with newly diagnosed diabetes or a duration < 5 years showed superior responses (p = 0.001), while no significant differences were found based on the timing of drug administration. Oral semaglutide replaced or supplemented prior therapies, allowing discontinuation of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), sulfonylureas, glinides, and acarbose, and deprescription of thiazolidinediones. A significant reduction in cardiovascular risk was observed (p = 0.04), together with a significant reduction in lipid parameters. Conclusions: Oral semaglutide showed significant short-term efficacy, reducing HbA1c, body weight, and cardiovascular risk in three months, making it a valuable therapeutic option. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 363 KiB  
Article
“Put Me in, Coach”: A Discussion of Deprescribing Roles, Responsibilities, and Motivations Based on a Qualitative Study with Healthcare Professional Students
by Devin Scott, Amy Hall, Rachel Barenie, Crystal Walker, Muneeza Khan, Paul Koltnow, William R. Callahan and Alina Cernasev
Pharmacy 2025, 13(3), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13030077 - 29 May 2025
Viewed by 501
Abstract
As the US population ages, the number of prescriptions managed by patients and healthcare teams is increasing. Thus, discontinuing or reducing medications that are considered to pose more risks than benefits can be achieved through deprescribing. Despite increasing calls for a stronger focus [...] Read more.
As the US population ages, the number of prescriptions managed by patients and healthcare teams is increasing. Thus, discontinuing or reducing medications that are considered to pose more risks than benefits can be achieved through deprescribing. Despite increasing calls for a stronger focus on deprescribing in healthcare education, current discussions highlight the lack of training on this topic within healthcare curricula. This is a significant barrier to effectively implementing the deprescribing process. This study aimed to characterize healthcare professional students (HPSs)’s perspectives on deprescribing within an interprofessional healthcare team, particularly regarding the motivations and roles of these future practitioners. Methods: Focus groups were conducted with HPSs at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center. The data collection, guided by a conceptual model, took place over three months in 2022. Data analysis was performed using thematic analysis, during which themes were identified through inductive coding. Results: Participants (n = 36) represented various faculties, including medicine, pharmacy, health professions, nursing, and dentistry. Two themes emerged: (1) Healthcare Team Members’ Roles and Responsibilities (2) “Put Me in, Coach”: Patient Safety Motivates Deprescribing. Conclusion: Data from HPSs highlighted the importance of an interprofessional healthcare team approach to deprescribing. Based on these insights, educators and practitioners should focus on establishing strong interprofessional healthcare teams that privilege open communication. Teams should consider deprescribing as a patient safety concern, as this may galvanize the team and provide additional motivation for performing the necessary work of deprescribing. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1159 KiB  
Article
Identification of Barriers and Needs in the Discontinuation of Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonists in Elderly Patients of a Rural Community—A Qualitative Study
by Tiago de Barros Mendes, Marta Nazha, Ana Luísa Neves and Paula Broeiro-Gonçalves
Geriatrics 2025, 10(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10010018 - 1 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1010
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The predictors of successful discontinuation of benzodiazepine agonist receptors (BZRA) in elderly patients are not well known due to lack of research on the subject, and there is a need for further investigation, with more focus from the patients’ point of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The predictors of successful discontinuation of benzodiazepine agonist receptors (BZRA) in elderly patients are not well known due to lack of research on the subject, and there is a need for further investigation, with more focus from the patients’ point of view. No previous studies were identified that have been conducted in Portugal on this subject. We proposed to identify the barriers and facilitators in the discontinuation of BZRA from the perceptions of elderly patients under prolonged prescription of BZRA, belonging to the same rural community. The contributions for further research are intended to be the identification of potential intervention targets directed at patients to reduce the prevalence of elderly patients under prolonged prescription of BZRA. Methods: A set of 15 semi-structured interviews with patients under prolonged prescription of BZRA was conducted. Content analysis was done by the main researcher and a reviewer to identify original emerging themes for the two underlying domains. Results: Four themes were identified as barriers to the discontinuation of BZRA: (1) patient characteristics, (2) clinical factors, (3) medication-related factors, and (4) context and external factors. Seven themes were identified as facilitators to the discontinuation of BZRA: (1) motivation, (2) patients’ knowledge, (3) perception of BZRA insufficiency, (4) access to written information, (5) access to alternatives, (6) time for decision-making, and (7) attitudes of health professionals. Conclusions: The findings highlight the challenging nature of BZRA discontinuation and the range of barriers and facilitators that impact patients’ behaviour towards this purpose. We subdivided the elements identified in two areas, therefore aiming at producing significant knowledge to outline potential intervention targets. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 717 KiB  
Systematic Review
Approaches to Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review
by Andrea Rossi, Lara Perrella, Stefano Scotti, Elena Olmastroni, Federica Galimberti, Ilaria Ardoino, Valentina Orlando, Enrica Menditto, Carlotta Franchi and Manuela Casula
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(20), 6283; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206283 - 21 Oct 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3518
Abstract
Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are some of the most frequently prescribed medications, but they are often used inappropriately, either being prescribed without a clear indication or continued for longer than necessary. In such cases, deprescribing is recommended. However, despite its proven [...] Read more.
Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are some of the most frequently prescribed medications, but they are often used inappropriately, either being prescribed without a clear indication or continued for longer than necessary. In such cases, deprescribing is recommended. However, despite its proven effectiveness, the implementation of deprescribing in clinical practice remains inconsistent and varied, making it challenging to identify the most effective strategies. The goal is to provide a comprehensive outline of deprescribing interventions for PPI therapy implemented across various settings and by different healthcare professionals. Methods: The study is designed to be a systematic review of the published literature. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from 1 January 1989 (the first PPI on the market) to 30 September 2024 for articles assessing PPI deprescribing in adult patients, focusing on the implementation rate (primary outcome) or effects on symptoms (secondary outcome). Results: After screening, 66 studies were included, predominantly pragmatic trials (N = 32) or randomized controlled trials (N = 25). We found a variety of interventions promoting PPI deprescription. Collaborative efforts involving multiple healthcare professionals, the use of algorithms for clinical decision-making, and patient involvement have proven to be key elements in the most effective strategies. Discontinuing therapy may not be advisable in cases of recurrent symptoms, suggesting that on-demand therapy could be a recommended approach. Deprescribing is particularly relevant for individuals with mild illnesses and symptoms, where tapering can effectively mitigate the rebound symptoms often associated with abrupt discontinuation. Conclusions: Given the current prevalence of inappropriate PPI prescribing, it is imperative to raise awareness among both physicians and patients about the importance of the deprescribing process, which should be tailored to the specific needs of each patient, considering his/her medical history, current health status, and personal preferences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 758 KiB  
Article
Prehabilitation in Frail Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Patients in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes
by Raquel Ramírez-Martín, Coro Mauleón Ladrero, Jose Antonio Gazo Martínez, Victoria Déniz-González, Isabel Martín Maestre, Lucía Corral-Sastre, María Villajos-Guijarro, Rocío Menéndez-Colino, Isabel Pascual Miguelañez and Juan Ignacio González-Montalvo
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(20), 6114; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206114 - 14 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2046
Abstract
Background: There is still limited evidence on the results of prehabilitation in very old frail patients. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes and course of octogenarian and nonagenarian patients undergoing prehabilitation before surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: There is still limited evidence on the results of prehabilitation in very old frail patients. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes and course of octogenarian and nonagenarian patients undergoing prehabilitation before surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: a prospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital from 2018 to 2022. All patients diagnosed with CRC over 80 years old and proposed for surgery were included. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for frailty detection was performed, and the therapeutic decision was taken by the multidisciplinary tumor committee. Prehabilitation led by the geriatric team was performed. The rate of medical and surgical complications, hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and first-year mortality were recorded. Results: CRC surgery was proposed in 184 patients >80 years. After a multidisciplinary decision, surgery was performed on 126 (68.5%) patients, of whom 12 (0.5%) were nonagenarians. Fifty percent of octogenarians and 86% of nonagenarians were frail. Prehabilitation consisted of the following: adapted physical exercise (100%); oral nutritional supplementation (73.8%); anemia treatment (59.5%); delirium prevention (5.6%); antidepressant treatment (15.9%); vitamin D supplementation (21.4%); and pharmacological deprescription (38.1%). The post-surgical complication rate was low (4.3% surgical and 29.4% medical complications), and in-hospital mortality was very low (3.2%). Nonagenarian patients had a higher rate of complications compared to octogenarians (OR 4.0 (95% CI 1.13–14.12))—mainly heart failure (OR 4.68 (95% CI 1.21–18.09))—but there were no differences in hospital stay or first-year mortality. Conclusions: prehabilitation in very old patients with CRC surgery is possible and provides good results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 739 KiB  
Article
An Internationally Derived Process of Healthcare Professionals’ Proactive Deprescribing Steps and Constituent Activities
by Sion Scott, Natalie Buac and Debi Bhattacharya
Pharmacy 2024, 12(5), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12050138 - 9 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1686
Abstract
Proactive deprescribing is the process of tapering or stopping a medicine before harm occurs. This study aimed to specify and validate, with an international sample of healthcare professionals, a proactive deprescribing process of steps and constituent activities. We developed a proactive deprescribing process [...] Read more.
Proactive deprescribing is the process of tapering or stopping a medicine before harm occurs. This study aimed to specify and validate, with an international sample of healthcare professionals, a proactive deprescribing process of steps and constituent activities. We developed a proactive deprescribing process framework of steps which we populated with literature-derived activities required to be undertaken by healthcare professionals. We distributed a survey to healthcare professionals internationally, requesting for each activity the frequency of its occurrence in practice and whether it was important. Extended response questions investigated barriers and enablers to deprescribing. The 263 survey respondents were from 25 countries. A proactive deprescribing process was developed comprising four steps: (1) identify a patient for potential stop of a medicine, (2) evaluate a patient for potential stop of a medicine, (3) stop a medicine(s), and (4) monitor after a medicine has been stopped, and 17 activities. All activities were considered important by ≥70% of respondents. Nine activities required healthcare professionals to undertake in direct partnership with the patient and/or caregiver, of which seven were only sometimes undertaken. Deprescribing interventions should include a focus on addressing the barriers and enablers of healthcare professionals undertaking the activities that require direct partnership with the patient and/or caregiver. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 472 KiB  
Article
Pharmacological Prescription at the End of Life: Quality Assessment in the Transition of Care to a Community Palliative Care Support Team
by Inês Rodrigues, Hugo Ribeiro, Carolina Costa, João Rocha-Neves and Marília Dourado
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(9), 1152; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16091152 - 30 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1978
Abstract
Appropriate pharmacological management is a cornerstone of quality in palliative care (PC), focusing on comfort and quality of life. Therapeutic review is crucial in PC, aiming to optimize symptom relief, reduce adverse effects, and manage drug interactions. This study aims to delve into [...] Read more.
Appropriate pharmacological management is a cornerstone of quality in palliative care (PC), focusing on comfort and quality of life. Therapeutic review is crucial in PC, aiming to optimize symptom relief, reduce adverse effects, and manage drug interactions. This study aims to delve into the real-world pharmacological prescription practices within a Community Palliative Care Support Team (CPCST) in the northern region of Portugal, comparing practices at admission and at the last consultation before death. It is an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study without intervention involving patients admitted to a CPCST in 2021. Data were obtained from clinical records, and the statistical analysis included descriptive and inferential measures. Sixty-four patients were included, with an average age of 77.34 years, referred mainly by a specialized Hospital Palliative Care Support Team (65.63%). Polypharmacy was present, with a significant increase in opioids, antipsychotics, prokinetics, antiemetics, antispasmodics, and local corticosteroids, and a reduction in drugs for peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux treatment, antithrombotics, hypolipidemics, antihypertensives, and antidiabetics, among others. The oral route was preferred, decreasing between the two analyzed moments (85.5% versus 49.1%). Pro re nata (PRN) medications increased significantly (p ≤ 0.001). The prescription profile reflects a focus on symptom relief. The deprescription of drugs for chronic comorbidities suggests adaptation to care goals. At the end of life, PRN medications increase significantly (1.34 versus 3.26, p ≤ 0.001), administered as needed to soothe fluctuating symptoms. The pharmacological classes that have significantly increased are relevant in alleviating common symptoms in PC. The use of alternative routes for medication administration increases as instability of the oral route occurs, leading to a reduction in orally administered medications. Among these alternatives, the subcutaneous route shows the largest increase. The findings underscore the importance of flexible and responsive medication strategies in end-of-life care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug–Drug Interactions—New Approaches and Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1515 KiB  
Article
Deprescribing NSAIDs: The Potential Role of Community Pharmacists
by Delsher Amedi and Parisa Gazerani
Pharmacy 2024, 12(4), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12040116 - 24 Jul 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2502
Abstract
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are largely used for controlling various pain conditions and are widely available in community pharmacies, with and without prescription. Despite their effectiveness, NSAIDs can pose significant risks due to potential side effects and drug interactions, particularly in polypharmacy and [...] Read more.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are largely used for controlling various pain conditions and are widely available in community pharmacies, with and without prescription. Despite their effectiveness, NSAIDs can pose significant risks due to potential side effects and drug interactions, particularly in polypharmacy and comorbidity contexts and for vulnerable users. This study investigated whether and how NSAIDs deprescribing can be conducted at the community pharmacy level by assessing pharmacists’ confidence, attitudes, and potential barriers and facilitators. Additionally, we aimed to identify any deprescribing guidelines that pharmacists could use. A literature search and a cross-sectional digital questionnaire targeting community pharmacists in Norway were conducted. Results showed that study participants (N = 73) feel confident in identifying needs for deprescribing NSAIDs but barriers such as time constraints, lack of financial compensation, and communication challenges were noted. Participants reported positive attitudes toward deprescribing but highlighted a need for better guidelines and training. This study highlights a gap in specific guidelines for deprescribing NSAIDs and a potential for enhancing pharmacists’ roles in the deprescribing process, for example, through training and improved financial incentives. Further research is encouraged to develop concrete strategies for an effective implementation where community pharmacists can be involved in the deprescribing of NSAIDs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 497 KiB  
Article
The Risk of Drug Interactions in Older Primary Care Patients after Hospital Discharge: The Role of Drug Reconciliation
by Cristina Vocca, Antonio Siniscalchi, Vincenzo Rania, Cecilia Galati, Gianmarco Marcianò, Caterina Palleria, Luca Catarisano, Ilaria Gareri, Marco Leuzzi, Lucia Muraca, Rita Citraro, Giacinto Nanci, Antonio Scuteri, Rosa Candida Bianco, Iolanda Fera, Antonietta Greco, Giacomo Leuzzi, Giovambattista De Sarro, Bruno D’Agostino and Luca Gallelli
Geriatrics 2023, 8(6), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics8060122 - 16 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2413
Abstract
Introduction: Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) represent an important clinical problem, particularly in older patients, due to polytherapy, comorbidity, and physiological changes in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic pathways. In this study, we investigated the association between drugs prescribed after discharge from the hospital or clinic and [...] Read more.
Introduction: Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) represent an important clinical problem, particularly in older patients, due to polytherapy, comorbidity, and physiological changes in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic pathways. In this study, we investigated the association between drugs prescribed after discharge from the hospital or clinic and the risk of DDIs with drugs used daily by each patient. Methods: We performed an observational, retrospective, multicenter study on the medical records of outpatients referred to general practitioners. DDIs were measured using the drug interaction probability scale. Potential drug interactions were evaluated by clinical pharmacologists (physicians) and neurologists. Collected data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: During the study, we evaluated 1772 medical records. We recorded the development of DDIs in 10.3% of patients; 11.6% of these patients required hospitalization. Logistic regression showed an association among DDIs, sex, and the number of drugs used (p = 0.023). Conclusions: This observational real-life study shows that the risk of DDIs is common in older patients. Physicians must pay more attention after hospital discharge, evaluating the treatment to reduce the risk of DDIs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Geriatric Rehabilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 252 KiB  
Article
The Barriers to Deprescription in Older Patients: A Survey of Spanish Clinicians
by Marta Mejías-Trueba, Aitana Rodríguez-Pérez, Emilio García-Cabrera, Carlos Jiménez-Juan and Susana Sánchez-Fidalgo
Healthcare 2023, 11(13), 1879; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131879 - 29 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1166
Abstract
Background and objective: There are barriers to deprescription that hinder its implementation in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to analyse the main barriers and limitations of the deprescription process perceived by physicians who care for multipathological patients. Materials and methods: [...] Read more.
Background and objective: There are barriers to deprescription that hinder its implementation in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to analyse the main barriers and limitations of the deprescription process perceived by physicians who care for multipathological patients. Materials and methods: The “deprescription questionnaire of elderly patients” was adapted to an online format and sent to physicians in geriatrics. Question 1 is a reference to establish agreement or disagreement with this practice. The influence of different aspects of deprescription was analysed via the demographic characteristics of the clinicians and perceptions of the various barriers (questions 2–9) by means of bivariate analysis. Based on the latter, a multivariate model was carried out to demonstrate the relationship between barriers and the degree of deprescription agreement among respondents. Results: Of the 72 respondents, 72.2% were in favour of deprescribing. Regarding the analyses, the demographic characteristics did not influence rankings. The deprescription of preventive drugs and consensus with patients were associated with a positive attitude towards deprescribing, while withdrawing drugs prescribed by other professionals, time constraints and patient reluctance emerged as possible barriers. The only factor independently associated with deprescribing was lack of time. Conclusions: Time was found to be the main barrier to deprescription. Training, the creation of multidisciplinary teams and integrated health systems are key facilitators. Full article
37 pages, 1126 KiB  
Review
Comprehensive Cardiovascular and Renal Protection in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
by Almudena Castro Conde, Domingo Marzal Martín, Raquel Campuzano Ruiz, Maria Rosa Fernández Olmo, Carlos Morillas Ariño, Juan José Gómez Doblas, Jose Luis Gorriz Teruel, Pilar Mazón Ramos, Xavier García-Moll Marimon, Maria Jose Soler Romeo, David León Jiménez, Vicente Arrarte Esteban, Juan Carlos Obaya Rebollar, Carlos Escobar Cervantes and Juan J. Gorgojo Martínez
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(12), 3925; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12123925 - 8 Jun 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5674
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is one of the main public health care problems worldwide. It is associated with a marked increased risk of developing atherosclerotic vascular disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease and death. It is essential to act during the early phases [...] Read more.
Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is one of the main public health care problems worldwide. It is associated with a marked increased risk of developing atherosclerotic vascular disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease and death. It is essential to act during the early phases of the disease, through the intensification of lifestyle changes and the prescription of those drugs that have been shown to reduce these complications, with the aim not only of achieving an adequate metabolic control, but also a comprehensive vascular risk control. In this consensus document, developed by the different specialists that treat these patients (endocrinologists, primary care physicians, internists, nephrologists and cardiologists), a more appropriate approach in the management of patients with T2DM or its complications is provided. A particular focus is given to the global control of cardiovascular risk factors, the inclusion of weight within the therapeutic objectives, the education of patients, the deprescription of those drugs without cardiovascular benefit, and the inclusion of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors as cardiovascular protective drugs, at the same level as statins, acetylsalicylic acid, or renin angiotensin system inhibitors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 745 KiB  
Article
Prescriptive Appropriateness: Inhospital Adherence to Proton Pump Inhibitors Deprescription Flow Chart
by Giammarco Baiardi, Giulia Calvini, Serena Panarello, Chiara Fioravanti, Manuela Stella, Antonietta Martelli, Giancarlo Antonucci and Francesca Mattioli
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(5), 635; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16050635 - 22 Apr 2023
Viewed by 2225
Abstract
The prescriptive appropriateness of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) in polypharmacy is controversial. PPIs are often overprescribed and the risk of prescribing errors and adverse drug reactions increases for each additional drug added to therapy. Hence, guided deprescription should be considered and easily implementable [...] Read more.
The prescriptive appropriateness of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) in polypharmacy is controversial. PPIs are often overprescribed and the risk of prescribing errors and adverse drug reactions increases for each additional drug added to therapy. Hence, guided deprescription should be considered and easily implementable in ward practice. This observational prospective study evaluated the implementation of a validated PPIs deprescription flow chart to real-life internal ward activity through the presence of a clinical pharmacologist as an enhancing additional factor by assessment of inhospital prescriber’s adherence to the proposed flow chart. Patients’ demographics and prescribing trends of PPIs prescriptions were analyzed by descriptive statistics. The final analysis of data included ninety-eight patients (forty-nine male and forty-nine female), aging 75.6 ± 10.6 years; 55.1% of patients had home-PPIs prescriptions, while 44.9% received inhospital-PPIs prescriptions. Evaluation of prescriber’s adherence to the flow chart revealed that the percentage of patients with a prescriptive/deprescriptive pathway conforming to that of the flow chart was 70.4%, with low symptomatologic recurrences. The clinical pharmacologists’ presence and influence in ward activity may have contributed to this finding, since continuous training of the prescribing physicians is deemed a success-related factor in the deprescribing strategy. Multidisciplinary management of PPIs deprescription protocols shows high adherence by prescribers in real-life hospital settings and low recurrence events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Safety and Relevant Issues in the Real-World)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 925 KiB  
Review
Cholinergic Antagonists and Behavioral Disturbances in Neurodegenerative Diseases
by Rachid Mahmoudi, Jean Luc Novella, Sarah Laurent-Badr, Sarah Boulahrouz, David Tran, Isabella Morrone and Yacine Jaïdi
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 6921; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24086921 - 7 Apr 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 6048
Abstract
Cholinergic antagonists interfere with synaptic transmission in the central nervous system and are involved in pathological processes in patients with neurocognitive disorders (NCD), such as behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). In this commentary, we will briefly review the current knowledge on [...] Read more.
Cholinergic antagonists interfere with synaptic transmission in the central nervous system and are involved in pathological processes in patients with neurocognitive disorders (NCD), such as behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). In this commentary, we will briefly review the current knowledge on the impact of cholinergic burden on BPSD in persons with NCD, including the main pathophysiological mechanisms. Given the lack of clear consensus regarding symptomatic management of BPSD, special attention must be paid to this preventable, iatrogenic condition in patients with NCD, and de-prescription of cholinergic antagonists should be considered in patients with BPSD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Dementia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 977 KiB  
Review
Deprescribing Strategies for Opioids and Benzodiazepines with Emphasis on Concurrent Use: A Scoping Review
by Yanning Wang, Debbie L. Wilson, Deanna Fernandes, Lauren E. Adkins, Ashley Bantad, Clint Copacia, Nilay Dharma, Pei-Lin Huang, Amanda Joseph, Tae Woo Park, Jeffrey Budd, Senthil Meenrajan, Frank A. Orlando, John Pennington, Siegfried Schmidt, Ronald Shorr, Constance R. Uphold and Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(5), 1788; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051788 - 23 Feb 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 6053
Abstract
While the Food and Drug Administration’s black-box warnings caution against concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine (OPI–BZD) use, there is little guidance on how to deprescribe these medications. This scoping review analyzes the available opioid and/or benzodiazepine deprescribing strategies from the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of [...] Read more.
While the Food and Drug Administration’s black-box warnings caution against concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine (OPI–BZD) use, there is little guidance on how to deprescribe these medications. This scoping review analyzes the available opioid and/or benzodiazepine deprescribing strategies from the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases (01/1995–08/2020) and the gray literature. We identified 39 original research studies (opioids: n = 5, benzodiazepines: n = 31, concurrent use: n = 3) and 26 guidelines (opioids: n = 16, benzodiazepines: n = 11, concurrent use: n = 0). Among the three studies deprescribing concurrent use (success rates of 21–100%), two evaluated a 3-week rehabilitation program, and one assessed a 24-week primary care intervention for veterans. Initial opioid dose deprescribing rates ranged from (1) 10–20%/weekday followed by 2.5–10%/weekday over three weeks to (2) 10–25%/1–4 weeks. Initial benzodiazepine dose deprescribing rates ranged from (1) patient-specific reductions over three weeks to (2) 50% dose reduction for 2–4 weeks, followed by 2–8 weeks of dose maintenance and then a 25% reduction biweekly. Among the 26 guidelines identified, 22 highlighted the risks of co-prescribing OPI–BZD, and 4 provided conflicting recommendations on the OPI–BZD deprescribing sequence. Thirty-five states’ websites provided resources for opioid deprescription and three states’ websites had benzodiazepine deprescribing recommendations. Further studies are needed to better guide OPI–BZD deprescription. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Guidelines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 945 KiB  
Article
Quality of Life Assessment in Patients Using Benzodiazepines during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Community Pharmacy Using EuroQol 5D-3L
by Daida Alberto Armas, Juan Ramón Santana Ayala, Yanira Román Castillo, Arturo Hardisson de la Torre and Carmen Rubio Armendáriz
Pharmacy 2023, 11(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy11010019 - 18 Jan 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2169
Abstract
Users of benzodiazepines (BZDs) should have their quality of life monitored to minimize the risks associated with long-term treatments. The aim of this study is to use the EuroQol 5D-3L to analyze the quality of life of 127 patients under treatment with BZDs [...] Read more.
Users of benzodiazepines (BZDs) should have their quality of life monitored to minimize the risks associated with long-term treatments. The aim of this study is to use the EuroQol 5D-3L to analyze the quality of life of 127 patients under treatment with BZDs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results show that lorazepam comprises 25.49% of all dispensing requests, and that the mean duration of BZDs treatments is four years (range: 0.3–25). When rating their general health status, BZDs users reported 59.29 points out of 100. Thirty-two percent of patients reported mobility problems; 16.5% reported having a lot of pain or discomfort despite being treated with BZDs, and 16.54% used a BZD together with an opioid analgesic. The EuroQol 5D-3L dimension “anxiety/depression” showed that, despite the use of BZDs, 48.2% of the patients reported being moderately anxious or depressed and 13.4% described themselves as very anxious or depressed. Nevertheless, 37.8% of BZDs users were identified as potential candidates to follow a BZD deprescription plan. In conclusion, BZDs users showed a low quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic. Older patients and females have been identified as groups of patients that could benefit from integrating the use of the EuroQol 5D-3L instrument into the protocols of the pharmaceutical care follow up. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacy Practice and Practice-Based Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop