Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = co-polarized phase difference (CPD)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
28 pages, 12706 KiB  
Article
Backscattering Statistics of Indoor Full-Polarization Scatterometric and Synthetic Aperture Radar Measurements of a Rice Field
by Xiangchen Liu, Yun Shao, Kun Li, Zhiqu Liu, Long Liu and Xiulai Xiao
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(4), 965; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15040965 - 9 Feb 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2058
Abstract
The backscattering coefficient σ0 of a rice field is closely related to the amplitude, power, and phase of its radar backscattered signals. An investigation of the statistics of indoor full-polarization scatterometric and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) measurements on rice fields in the [...] Read more.
The backscattering coefficient σ0 of a rice field is closely related to the amplitude, power, and phase of its radar backscattered signals. An investigation of the statistics of indoor full-polarization scatterometric and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) measurements on rice fields in the Laboratory of Target Microwave Properties (LAMP) is implemented in terms of the amplitude, power, and phase difference of backscattered signals. The validity and accuracy of LAMP measured data are studied and confirmed for the first time. The Rayleigh fading model and phase difference statistical model are both validated by the experimental data. Continuous microwave spectrum is obtained after spatial and frequency averaging over N independent scatterometric samples and full-polarization images are generated by applying a focusing algorithm to the SAR data. Comparisons between scatterometric results and SAR images with three resolutions of rice field scene are conducted with respect to amplitude and co-pol phase difference (CPD) statistics, as well as backscattering coefficients. The results show that the measured statistics of a rice field scene are in good agreement with those calculated by theoretical formulas. Spatial and frequency averaging of scatterometric data can increase N and thus improve the estimation accuracy of the backscattering coefficients. SAR images show a shift to the near range due to the intrinsic height of the rice plants and the probable existence of the double bounce scattering between vertical rice stems and the water surface considering the measurement geometry. The measured amplitude statistics of the SAR images approach a Rayleigh distribution with reduction of the resolution cell size while the size has little effect on the CPD statistics. The differences between backscattering coefficients extracted from the scatterometric data and SAR images confirm a 1-dB calibration accuracy in power of the LAMP measurement system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Radar Signal and Data Processing with Applications)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 6859 KiB  
Article
Response of Multi-Incidence Angle Polarimetric RADARSAT-2 Data to Herbaceous Vegetation Features in the Lower Paraná River Floodplain, Argentina
by Natalia Soledad Morandeira, Matías Ernesto Barber, Francisco Matías Grings, Frank Ahern, Patricia Kandus and Brian Brisco
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(13), 2518; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132518 - 27 Jun 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3916
Abstract
Wetland ecosystems play a key role in hydrological and biogeochemical cycles. In emergent vegetation targets, the occurrence of double-bounce scatter is indicative of the presence of water and can be valuable for hydrological monitoring. Double-bounce scatter would lead to an increase of σ [...] Read more.
Wetland ecosystems play a key role in hydrological and biogeochemical cycles. In emergent vegetation targets, the occurrence of double-bounce scatter is indicative of the presence of water and can be valuable for hydrological monitoring. Double-bounce scatter would lead to an increase of σ0HH over σ0VV and a non-zero co-polarized phase difference (CPD). In the Lower Paraná River floodplain, a total of 11 full polarimetric RADARSAT-2 scenes from a wide range of incidence angles were acquired during a month. Flooded targets dominated by two herbaceous species were sampled: Schoenoplectus californicus (four sites, Bulrush marshes) and Ludwigia peruviana (three sites, Broadleaf marshes). As a general trend, σ0HH was higher than σ0VV, especially at the steeper incidence angles. By modeling CPD with maximum likelihood estimations, we found results consistent with double-bounce scatter in two Ludwigia plots, at certain scene incidence angles. Incidence angle accounted for most of the variation on σ0HH, whereas emergent green biomass was the main feature influencing σ0HV. Multivariate models explaining backscattering variation included the incidence angle and at least two of these variables: emergent plant height, stem diameter, number of green stems, and emergent green biomass. This study provides an example of using CPD to decide on the contribution of double-bounce scatter and highlights the influence of vegetation biomass on radar response. Even with the presence of water below vegetation, the contribution of double-bounce scatter to C-band backscattering depends on scene incidence angles and may be negligible in dense herbaceous targets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wetland Monitoring Using Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 2817 KiB  
Article
Internal Wave Dark-Band Signatures in ALOS-PALSAR Imagery Revealed by the Standard Deviation of the Co-Polarized Phase Difference
by Carina R. de Macedo and José C. B. da Silva
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(15), 2372; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152372 - 23 Jul 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2908
Abstract
Analysis of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images in L-band of short-period internal waves (IWs), and classification of their radar signatures is presented by means of a polarimetric data set from ALOS-PALSAR mission. We choose the polarimetric feature named standard deviation(std) of the co-polarized [...] Read more.
Analysis of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images in L-band of short-period internal waves (IWs), and classification of their radar signatures is presented by means of a polarimetric data set from ALOS-PALSAR mission. We choose the polarimetric feature named standard deviation(std) of the co-polarized phase difference (CPD) to identify fundamental differences in SAR signatures of internal waves, and divided them into three different classes, according to their backscattered modulation depths and morphology as well as the std CPD, namely: double-signed, single-negative, and single-positive signatures, for IW normalized image transects that display, respectively, signatures in the form of bright/dark, dark, and bright bands that correspond to positive/negative, negative, or positive variations of radar backscatter. These radar power types of signatures have a counterpart in the std CPD normalized transects, and in this paper we discuss those correlations and decorrelations. We focus in the single-negative type of signature, that is dark bands on gray background, and show that the std CPD is greatly enhanced over the troughs and rear slopes of those IWs. It is suggested that such behavior is consistent with the presence of surface slicks owing to enhanced surfactant concentration. Furthermore, those single-negative SAR signatures appear at locations where and when biological productivity is enhanced. It is found that the modulation depths associated to the std CPD is higher than the one associated to the HH-polarized radar backscatter for single-negative signatures propagating in the range direction, while the reverse occurs for the other types of signatures. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 3149 KiB  
Letter
Retrieval of Snow Depth and Snow Water Equivalent Using Dual Polarization SAR Data
by Akshay Patil, Gulab Singh and Christoph Rüdiger
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(7), 1183; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071183 - 7 Apr 2020
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 5705
Abstract
This paper deals with the retrieval of snow depth (SD) and snow water equivalent (SWE) using dual-polarization (HH-VV) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. The effect of different snowpack conditions on the SD and SWE inversion accuracy was demonstrated by using three TerraSAR-X acquisitions. [...] Read more.
This paper deals with the retrieval of snow depth (SD) and snow water equivalent (SWE) using dual-polarization (HH-VV) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. The effect of different snowpack conditions on the SD and SWE inversion accuracy was demonstrated by using three TerraSAR-X acquisitions. The algorithm is based on the relationship between the SD, the co-polar phase difference (CPD), and particle anisotropy. The Dhundi observatory in the Indian Himalaya was selected as a validation test site where a field campaign was conducted for ground truth measurements in January 2016. Using the field measured values of the snow parameters, the particle anisotropy has been optimized and provided as an input to the SD retrieval algorithm. A spatially variable snow density ( ρ s ) was used for the estimation of the SWE, and a temporal resolution of 90 m was achieved in the inversion process. When the retrieval accuracy was tested for different snowpack conditions, it was found that the proposed algorithm shows good accuracy for recrystallized dry snowpack without distinct layering and low wetness (w). The statistical indices, namely, the root mean square error (RMSE), the mean absolute difference (MAD), and percentage error (PE), were used for the accuracy assessment. The algorithm was able to retrieve SD with an average MAE and RMSE of 6.83 cm and 7.88 cm, respectively. The average MAE and RMSE values for SWE were 17.32 mm and 21.41 mm, respectively. The best case PE in the SD and the SWE retrieval were 8.22 cm and 18.85 mm, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing Communications)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 11487 KiB  
Article
Mapping Oil Spills from Dual-Polarized SAR Images Using an Artificial Neural Network: Application to Oil Spill in the Kerch Strait in November 2007
by Daeseong Kim and Hyung-Sup Jung
Sensors 2018, 18(7), 2237; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072237 - 11 Jul 2018
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 4430
Abstract
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been widely used to detect oil-spill areas through the backscattering intensity difference between oil and background pixels. However, since the signal is similar to that produced by other phenomena, positive identification can be challenging. In this study we [...] Read more.
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been widely used to detect oil-spill areas through the backscattering intensity difference between oil and background pixels. However, since the signal is similar to that produced by other phenomena, positive identification can be challenging. In this study we developed an algorithm to effectively analyze large-scale oil spill areas in SAR images by focusing on optimizing the input layer to artificial neural network (ANN) through removal the factor of lowering the accuracy. An ANN algorithm was used to generate probability maps of oil spills. Highly accurate pixel-based data processing was conducted through false or un-detection element reduction by normalizing the image or applying a non-local (NL) means filter and median filter to the input neurons for ANN. In addition, the standard deviation of co-polarized phase difference (CPD) was used to reduce false detection from the look-alike with weak damping effect. The algorithm was validated using TerraSAR-X images of an oil spill caused by stranded oil tanker Volganefti-139 in the Kerch Strait in 2007. According to the validation results of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the oil spill was detected with an accuracy of about 95.19% and un-detection or false detection by look-alike and speckle noise was greatly reduced. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop