Search Results (263)

Oral health during pregnancy is essential for maternal and child well-being, as hormonal and physiological changes increase women’s susceptibility to oral diseases. Despite the recognized importance of prenatal dental care, adherence to dental services remains a challenge in the public health context. This study aimed to analyze oral health and the use of dental services during pregnancy through the perception of pregnant women. It represents the qualitative phase of a mixed-method study conducted with 25 pregnant women (with and without dental care) receiving prenatal care in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Participants were selected through saturation sampling, and data were collected via semi-structured interviews, followed by content analysis. The findings revealed four major themes: barriers and facilitators to dental care, changes during pregnancy and oral health. Discomfort from oral changes was a common concern. Barriers included misinformation, fear, cultural beliefs, and service organization. In contrast, facilitating factors were identified, such as care prioritization, support from healthcare teams, health education, and access through SUS. This study concludes that emotional, cultural, and contextual aspects shape the use of dental services during pregnancy. Access through SUS is perceived as an important facilitator, which simultaneously presents organizational weaknesses that need to be addressed. Full article

(1) Background: Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer is the fastest-growing head and neck malignancy, yet vaccination coverage remains suboptimal. (2) Methods: In this cross-sectional survey conducted from April 2022 to April 2023, 400 parents of patients aged 8–18 years (mean ± SD = 12.8 ± 2.6; 59.3% female) reported their child’s HPV vaccination status and willingness to initiate or complete the vaccine series at a dental clinic. For those who were not fully vaccinated, reasons for refusal were documented. (3) Results: Over half (54.5%, n = 218) of the children were not fully vaccinated. Notably, 21% (46/218) of parents indicated an immediate willingness to vaccinate their child if the dentist offered it—a significant potential for improvement compared to general healthcare settings. Reported barriers included preference for a physician’s office (43.6%), indecision (20.3%), unspecified concerns (14.5%), safety worries (8.1%), and religious objections (5.2%). Male and younger patients (9–11 years) showed significantly lower vaccination coverage (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Dentists can substantially impact public health by integrating immunization counseling, interprofessional collaboration, and vaccine administration, thereby addressing critical gaps in HPV-related cancer prevention. These findings highlight the opportunity for dental offices to enhance vaccination rates and prompt further research, education, and policy initiatives to advance the oral and general health of our patients. Full article

Background: Prematurely born newborns with low birth weight constitute a group of patients who require special care from the first days of life. Prematurity and low birth weight affect about 13.4 million infants. Risk factors include placental disorders but also factors related to the mother, such as smoking, alcohol drinking, drug use, malnutrition, or certain diseases. It is imperative to educate women of reproductive age (15–49) about the basic factors influencing embryonic development, such as oral health, diet, medicine intake, and harmful habits. Even though most women are aware of the negative impact of harmful habits on the fetus, still too little attention is paid to oral health in pregnant women. Poor oral health may influence the well-being of the future mother, as well as of the child. Therefore, women of reproductive age and those who are pregnant must have adequate knowledge on this subject. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge of Polish women of reproductive age (15–49) regarding oral health during pregnancy, including the impact of dental treatment, oral hygiene, and maternal oral conditions on pregnancy outcomes and the health of the newborn. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 508 women, in the reproductive age, whose age ranged from 18 to 49 years old. The surveys were conducted from April 2020 to November 2020. The questionnaire was originally developed based on the available literature and consisted of seven sections: basic information, general health and habits, pregnancy status and dental care, knowledge of treatment options during pregnancy, oral health status and its association with the risk of preterm birth, prematurity and the child’s oral health, and breastfeeding and oral development. Results: After excluding incomplete questionnaires, a total of 499 questionnaires were included in the analysis. Women participating in the study had a fairly good understanding of the impact of oral health on the fetus and the role of breastfeeding in the development of the stomatognathic system (from 50% to 70% correct answers). However, even though most respondents had completed higher education (344/68.94%), their knowledge of oral health, preterm birth, and low birth weight was very limited (including the impact of inflammation on the intrauterine development of the child or bacteria and transfer across the placenta). In these sections, the percentage of correct answers ranged from less than 20% to 50%. When analyzing knowledge by age, education, number of births, and place of residence, the highest levels of knowledge were observed among respondents with higher education, particularly those aged 27–32. Conclusions: Respondents had a fairly good understanding of the general impact of oral health during pregnancy and recognition of the importance of breastfeeding for infants. However, their knowledge about the impact of bacteria and inflammation in the mother’s oral cavity on prematurity and low birth weight was limited. Therefore, educating women of reproductive age and pregnant women on this topic is essential, as it may help reduce the adverse consequences of prematurity. Full article

Background/Objectives: Pacifier use is a widespread soothing practice during infancy, but extended use has been linked to adverse dental outcomes, particularly malocclusion. This review aimed to evaluate the association between pacifier use and dental developmental issues in infants and toddlers and to identify key influencing factors. Methods: A scoping review using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source was performed. Peer-reviewed, full-text articles published in English between 2014 and 2024 were screened by two independent reviewers using predefined criteria. Eligible studies were thematically analyzed. Results: From 262 records, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. Pacifier use was consistently associated with an increased prevalence of malocclusions, including anterior open bite, posterior crossbite, and overjet. The risk and severity of dental issues were strongly influenced by the duration, frequency, and intensity of pacifier use. Prolonged use beyond three years significantly increased the likelihood of structural changes requiring intervention. Conclusion: There is strong evidence linking pacifier use to negative dental developmental outcomes, particularly when use is prolonged or frequent. Early intervention, caregiver education, and timely weaning are critical to minimizing long-term oral health risks. Future research should explore pacifier design, objective measures of use, and how socioeconomic factors may influence pacifier use patterns and oral health outcomes. Understanding these relationships can support the development of more targeted and equitable prevention strategies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Gastrostomy tube (GT) placement plays a vital role in managing children with chronic illnesses who are unable to meet their nutritional needs orally. While its clinical benefits are well established, limited data exist on caregivers’ satisfaction with GT use in Jordan. This study aimed to assess caregivers’ satisfaction and identify factors that influence their experiences by using a validated satisfaction scoring system in which a score greater than 20 indicates a high level of satisfaction. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Jordan University Hospital, including children under 18 years of age who underwent endoscopic GT insertion between July 2017 and December 2024. Caregivers completed the Structured Satisfaction Questionnaire with Gastrostomy Feeding (SAGA-8), and demographic and clinical data were collected. Statistical analyses explored associations between satisfaction levels and patient-, caregiver-, and healthcare-related factors. Results: A total of 46 caregivers participated. The median satisfaction score was 26.1, surpassing the high satisfaction threshold of 20. Overall, 63% of caregivers expressed satisfaction or high satisfaction with GT feeding, and 82.6% were satisfied with the support provided by the healthcare team. Additionally, 69.5% and 65.2% of caregivers reported improvements in their child’s nutritional status and overall family well-being, respectively. Notably, 89.1% observed a reduction in feeding time, and 84.8% reported fewer respiratory infections following GT placement. Over half of the caregivers (58.7%) indicated that they would have agreed to earlier GT placement if they had been more aware of its benefits. Conclusions: Caregivers reported high satisfaction with GT use, with scores well above the validated threshold indicating high satisfaction. These findings highlight the positive impact of GT placement on children’s health outcomes and family quality of life. Enhancing caregiver education and providing robust healthcare support are crucial to improving the management of children who require GT feeding. Full article

Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH) is a common dental condition that affects the mineralization of the enamel, primarily affecting the first permanent molars and often the incisors. This condition can lead to a wide range of clinical presentations, from mild opacities to severe post-eruptive breakdown, which can significantly impact a child’s oral health and quality of life. Background/Objectives: The prevalence and complex management of MIH have posed a significant challenge for dental practitioners. Our preceding investigation found that 14.3% of school-aged children have MIH. Based on this finding, we wanted to understand what other Romanian dental professionals think about this condition. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the awareness, perception, and clinical management approaches of Romanian dentists toward MIH in order to inform future educational strategies and contribute to the development of dedicated preventive programs. Methods: To gain a comprehensive understanding of MIH in actual clinical settings, we developed and administered a questionnaire consisting of three distinct sections. Our objective was to capture the collective knowledge and perspectives of dental practitioners. We distributed the survey, which included 14 pertinent questions, to a large professional group of Romanian dentists. Results: This study collected responses from 219 Romanian dental practitioners (median age: 34 years) about their experiences with MIH. The vast majority (86.76%) had encountered MIH cases in their practice, with half reporting moderate prevalence among their patients. The most frequently observed complications were hypersensitivity (41.95%), pulp exposure (33.33%), and failed restorations (24.71%). While adhesive restorations were identified as the overall preferred treatment approach (70.00%), notable differences emerged in both clinical complications encountered and therapeutic approaches implemented across dental specialties. There was near-unanimous agreement on the importance of early MIH diagnosis (99.09%), and almost all participants (98.63%) expressed a desire for more information about this condition, demonstrating high awareness and concern about MIH among Romanian dental professionals. Conclusions: This study highlights that general dentists, endodontists, and pedodontists encounter MIH patients frequently in their practice, emphasizing the critical need to enhance awareness and education about MIH among both dental professionals and the general public. Full article

This study aimed to investigate the association between the different information sources on infant oral hygiene accessed by mothers and infant oral hygiene practices in South Australia. Information on the oral hygiene practices used in 6-month-old infants—gum/tooth cleaning in the past 3 months, frequency of brushing, and the usage of fluoridated toothpaste—were acquired from the Study of Mothers’ and Infants’ Life Events Affecting Oral Health (SMILE) cohort survey. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression modelling were used to analyse the relationship between the information sources and infant oral hygiene practices. The majority of mothers (60.4%) reported not having cleaned their 6-month-old’s gums/teeth in the past 3 months. One-third of mothers with 6-month-olds did not seek information on infant oral hygiene. Mothers who sought advice from dentists were more likely to have cleaned their infant’s gums/teeth in the past 3 months, and those with infants whose teeth had erupted were also more likely to clean their infants’ teeth twice or more daily. We can conclude that mothers who sought information on infant oral hygiene from more than one source adopted generally better oral hygiene practices for their infants, with a dentist’s advice notably increasing the likelihood of mothers following the guidelines for cleaning their infants’ teeth. Full article

Aim: This study aimed to determine the oral health profile of children with autism spectrum disorder and to analyze the impact of their oral health status on their personal quality of life and the quality of life of their families. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional online study was conducted on 121 parents. A self-structured questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, parents’ perceptions of their child’s oral health, oral hygiene practices, and access to dental care. Additionally, the Parental–Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire (P-CPQ-16, 16 items) and the Family Impact Scale (FIS-8, 8 items) were employed. The data were analyzed descriptively and using the Mann–Whitney U test and the Kruskal–Wallis H test. Results: No significant differences were found in FIS-8 and P-CPQ-16 scores between parents and children based on their sociodemographic characteristics. However, a significant association was observed between P-CPQ-16 and FIS-8 total scores and the type of used dental care (general dental practice vs. adapted practice and general anesthesia, p ≤ 0.001), dental visit frequency (regular vs. occasional, p < 0.05), child cooperation level during dental visits (cooperative vs. uncooperative, p ≤ 0.001), and dental care access challenges (p < 0.05). Parents reported a high prevalence of poor oral health in their children: the experience of tooth decay (48.1%), malocclusion (47.1%), bruxism (38.8%), bad breath (34.7%), and toothache (28.8%) in the previous 12 months. Most children brushed their teeth daily (89.3%), often with the help of their parents (44.6%). The most frequently reported difficulty in maintaining oral hygiene was the children’s unwillingness to cooperate (62.8%). Conclusions: Poor perceived oral health in children with autism spectrum disorder is significantly linked to a lower quality of life for both them and their families, especially when access to dental care is difficult and there is a lack of cooperation. Addressing these barriers and the high prevalence of oral health problems through tailored strategies is critical to improving children’s well-being. Full article

Background: Oral diseases represent a constant burden for health care and socio-economic systems as they are correlated to other non-communicable diseases. The aim of the proposed intervention is to test the effect of daily tooth brushing and oral health education on the oral health status of kindergarten children. Methods: The protocol will be conducted based on a previous epidemiological survey and conducted over 24 months; it has been developed on different levels. Dental hygienists will receive specific training to deliver oral health promotion to children and nursery educators. Training will focus on tailoring key messages to the specific age at visit; this will be outlined in the care pathway and offer practical preparation for delivering interventions and a toothpaste/toothbrush scheme. It will also, involving involve offering free daily tooth brushing to every 4–6-year-old child attending nursery. Data will be collected in four kindergartens in the capital or metropolitan areas, two kindergartens each in two large cities, and one kindergarten each in four villages from different geographic areas. Procedures used to assess the outcomes of each activity will be tailored to specific outcomes. Daily tooth-brushing activities will be monitored using qualitative research. A cost analysis including the distribution of necessary materials and correct delivery of products that shows price trends and percentage differences over the time span as well as consumer price index evaluation for the given time span will be conducted. Clinical outcomes will be evaluated using the caries incidence rate; this will be calculated for each tooth as the unit of analysis and evaluated using a multi-step approach. Discussion: Downstream oral health prevention interventions, like clinical prevention and oral health promotion, aim to enhance children’s quality of life. The program’s goal is to progress towards upstream interventions for a more significant impact. Full article

Background/Objectives: Early childhood caries (ECC) is a significant global public health issue with economic and psychosocial consequences, impacting families and pediatric dentists. It affects children’s quality of life, causing pain and infection. Despite increasing research on ECC cross-sectional studies worldwide, inconsistencies and gaps remain in terms of geographical disparities. This study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of cross-sectional surveys on ECC by examining the co-authorship, citation analysis, co-citation networks, and keyword co-occurrence. Methods: An advanced search was performed using relevant terms in the Dimensions database from 2005 to 2024. Bibliometric parameters were retrieved through the database’s analytical view tool and VOSviewer software. Results: A total of 571 documents were identified, with the highest output between 2019 and 2023 (355 records). Saul Martins Paiva authored the most articles (10), with 294 citations and a total link strength of 19. Brazil and the U.S. had the highest numbers of publications (56 and 52) and total link strengths, i.e., a measure of collaborative ties (21 and 50). The Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais in Brazil had the most published documents (15). BMC Oral Health led in terms of citations (44 articles, 899 citations, average 20.43%). The frequently co-occurring terms included ECC (1147 occurrences), oral health (417), and preschool child (301). Conclusions: This bibliometric analysis highlights the global interest in cross-sectional ECC studies beyond pediatric dentistry, helping researchers understand the field’s scope and progress. Full article

Background/Objectives: Parental attitudes play a crucial role in shaping children’s oral health habits and preventing dental diseases. This study aimed to explore the theoretical pathways through which parental behavior and attitudes toward child oral health can influence the dental caries experience as measured by the dmf-t index in preschool children in Lithuania. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 302 children aged 4–7 years and their parents (262 mothers). Parental attitudes were assessed using the Parental Attitudes Towards Child Oral Health (PACOH) scale. For the children, the following variables were considered: sex, age, dental caries experience (dmf-t index in the primary dentition), oral hygiene index (Silness–Löe Plaque Index), toothbrushing frequency, and parental assistance with toothbrushing. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was applied for the data analysis. Results: The main path through which parental attitudes towards child oral health influenced the dmf-t index was via toothbrushing frequency (β = −0.17) or parental assistance with toothbrushing (β = 0.24). These factors were then linked to the oral hygiene index (β = 0.20 and β = −0.47, respectively), which ultimately influenced dmf-t (β = 0.52). The parents’ attitudes and toothbrushing frequency per se had no significant effect on children’s dmf-t (β = −0.06 and β = −0.04, respectively). The final model met all goodness-of-fit criteria: Chi-square test p = 0.211, Incremental Fit Index IFI = 0.994, Tucker–Lewis Index TLI = 0.982, Comparative Fit Index CFI = 0.994, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation RMSEA = 0.038. Conclusions: Findings from this study demonstrate that parents play a significant role in determining children’s oral health. Regular toothbrushing, parental assistance with toothbrushing, and good oral hygiene are critical factors linking parents’ oral health-related attitudes to a child’s experience of early caries. Identifying the associations between dental caries risk factors helps plan interventions. Full article

Objectives: Dental caries is one of the most prevalent oral diseases worldwide, including in Africa. The aim of this article was to provide a comprehensive review of dental caries status of children and adolescents living in the West African region. Methods: Articles that fulfilled the study selection criteria were identified through systematic search in electronic databases (EMBASE and MEDLINE). Titles and abstracts were examined manually to screen for articles that study the caries prevalence and experience of children under the age of 18, and only English publications published from the years 2015 to 2024 were included. Publications that include participants with special healthcare needs were excluded. Relevant data related to caries prevalence and severity of participants below 18 were extracted with a standardized spreadsheet. Results: Out of 1288 studies, a total of 18 studies were included. Among the 16 countries in West Africa, only 3 countries (19%) including Ghana, Nigeria, and Senegal met the inclusion criteria, with a majority (15/18, 78.9%) focusing on Nigerian children and adolescents. The dmft scores of the included studies ranged from 0.06 to 3.04, and the DMFT scores ranged from 0.02 to 2.65. It is worth noting that dmft/DMFT scores across different countries were collected with a high heterogeneity in study design, and were thereby not directly comparable. Conclusions: The majority of the included studies were conducted in Nigeria. There are significant variations in caries prevalence and caries experience among children and adolescent in West Africa. Further research on oral health surveillance in West Africa is needed. Full article

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in pediatric populations is an emerging area of interest due to its potential role in early viral transmission and long-term oncogenic risk. The oral cavity may serve as a reservoir for high-risk HPV types; however, its prevalence in children remains under-investigated and unclear. The HOPE (Human papillomavirus Oral infection in PEdiatric population) project aims to assess the prevalence of oral HPV using an innovative salivary sampling method, also exploring the influence of social determinants on parental awareness and attitudes toward HPV vaccination. This paper presents the findings from a cross-sectional pilot study. Methods: This pilot investigation included a total of 70 children (0–14 years) who underwent an oral examination and non-invasive salivary sampling using the novel LolliSponge device. HPV detection was performed using INNO-LiPA^® HPV genotyping. Parents completed a questionnaire assessing socio-demographic factors and HPV-related knowledge. Associations between oral health status, social determinants, and HPV awareness were analyzed. Results: The LolliSponge device demonstrated excellent acceptability among the pilot population. The mean age at recruitment of the children thus far (8 years) appears to correlate with the absence of oral HPV infection. Regarding parental knowledge and attitudes, 51 out of the 70 respondents (72.9%, 95% CI: 62–83%) reported having heard of HPV; however, 94.3% (66/70) were unaware of its transmission routes, and 60% (42/70) did not know that it can cause cancer. Only 4 out of the 70 participants (5.7%) reported that their child had received the HPV vaccine. Lower awareness of the HPV vaccine was significantly associated with a lower educational level (p = 0.001), being married (p = 0.03), and having three or more children (p = 0.039). Awareness of the vaccine’s existence also varied significantly by parental occupation (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The pilot findings of the HOPE project highlight both the potential of innovative strategies for detecting oral HPV infection in children and critical gaps in parental knowledge and vaccine uptake. Preliminary data also reveal an age-related bias in HPV status, suggesting the need for further investigations in a larger cohort of younger children (<5 years). Full article

Background/Objectives: Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) has become increasingly significant in dentistry. By incorporating patient perspectives through questionnaires alongside objective diagnoses, the understanding of diseases is enhanced. This study examines OHRQoL during the early COVID-19 pandemic in children aged 0–10 who visited the Emergency unit of Pediatric Dentistry at the Medical University of Vienna from March to May 2020, focusing on the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on various social and health aspects. The study aimed to assess OHRQoL in children during the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic and correlate it with other health and social conditions. Materials and Methods: Children (up to 10 years) and their parents visiting the Emergency Unit of the department completed OHRQoL questionnaires. In children aged 0–6, their parents answered the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale questionnaire (ECOHIS), while 7–10-year-olds completed the Child Perception Questionnaire (CPQ) by themselves. Summary scores and associations between oral and general health subdomains were analyzed. Results: Both the ECOHIS and CPQ groups showed high general summary scores, indicating decreased OHRQoL (ECOHIS 12.22 [±8.68] and CPQ 18.36 [±12.35]). The highest scores were in the “oral symptoms” domain, mainly due to “toothache”. Significant correlations were observed between “general health” and “oral health” with the “family section” in the ECOHIS group and between “oral health” and “oral symptoms” with “emotional well-being” in the CPQ group. Conclusions: During the pandemic, both age groups experienced decreased OHRQoL. Family background influenced oral health (ECOHIS), while oral symptoms and emotional well-being correlated with oral health (CPQ). Further research is needed to understand pandemic-related factors affecting OHRQoL and develop preventive strategies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Some of the sub-district health promotion hospitals (SHPHs) have transferred to local administrative organizations (LAOs). This may impact dental services and oral health of children aged 0–12 years. This study aimed to investigate and compare the dental services and oral health conditions of children aged 0–12 years between transferred and non-transferred SHPHs in northern Thailand. Methods: The study was a retrospective cohort study. Data on dental service provision and oral health conditions were retrieved using secondary data from the national health security office between 2017 and 2021. The data were analyzed and presented using descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and unpaired t-test. Results: Overall, the findings revealed that transferred SHPHs generally provided fewer dental services than non-transferred SHPHs. Regarding oral health conditions, transferred SHPHs reported a statistically significantly higher prevalence of dental caries compared to non-transferred SHPHs at the age of 3 years (31.3% vs. 22.2%), the age of 5 years (51.2% vs. 30.7%), and the age of 12 years (37.1% vs. 30%), respectively. Transferred SHPHs have higher decayed, missing, and filled teeth mean scores compared to non-transferred SHPHs in children aged 3 years (mean diff: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3 to 0.7) and 12 years (mean diff: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.5). Conclusions: Transferred SHPHs have lower dental service provision but higher oral health problems than non-transferred SHPHs. Close monitoring for the dental service provision and oral health among children aged 0–12 years is needed, especially in the area of responsibility of the transferred SHPHs. Full article