Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (46)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = brainstem auditory-evoked response

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 615 KB  
Article
Auditory Processing and Speech Sound Disorders: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Findings
by Konstantinos Drosos, Paris Vogazianos, Dionysios Tafiadis, Louiza Voniati, Alexandra Papanicolaou, Klea Panayidou and Chryssoula Thodi
Audiol. Res. 2025, 15(5), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15050119 - 19 Sep 2025
Viewed by 217
Abstract
Background: Children diagnosed with Speech Sound Disorders (SSDs) encounter difficulties in speech perception, especially when listening in the presence of background noise. Recommended protocols for auditory processing evaluation include behavioral linguistic and speech processing tests, as well as objective electrophysiological measures. The present [...] Read more.
Background: Children diagnosed with Speech Sound Disorders (SSDs) encounter difficulties in speech perception, especially when listening in the presence of background noise. Recommended protocols for auditory processing evaluation include behavioral linguistic and speech processing tests, as well as objective electrophysiological measures. The present study compared the auditory processing profiles of children with SSD and typically developing (TD) children using a battery of behavioral language and auditory tests combined with auditory evoked responses. Methods: Forty (40) parents of 7–10 years old Greek Cypriot children completed parent questionnaires related to their children’s listening; their children completed an assessment comprising language, phonology, auditory processing, and auditory evoked responses. The experimental group included 24 children with a history of SSDs; the control group consisted of 16 TD children. Results: Three factors significantly differentiated SSD from TD children: Factor 1 (auditory processing screening), Factor 5 (phonological awareness), and Factor 13 (Auditory Brainstem Response—ABR wave V latency). Among these, Factor 1 consistently predicted SSD classification both independently and in combined models, indicating strong ecological and diagnostic relevance. This predictive power suggests real-world listening behaviors are central to SSD differentiation. The significant correlation between Factor 5 and Factor 13 may suggest an interaction between auditory processing at the brainstem level and higher-order phonological manipulation. Conclusions: This research underscores the diagnostic significance of integrating behavioral and physiological metrics through dimensional and predictive methodologies. Factor 1, which focuses on authentic listening environments, was identified as the strongest predictor. These results advocate for the inclusion of ecologically valid listening items in the screening for APD. Poor discrimination of speech in noise imposes discrepancies between incoming auditory information and retained phonological representations, which disrupts the implicit processing mechanisms that align auditory input with phonological representations stored in memory. Speech and language pathologists can incorporate pertinent auditory processing assessment findings to identify potential language-processing challenges and formulate more effective therapeutic intervention strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Speech and Language)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2429 KB  
Article
Electrophysiological Variations in Auditory Potentials in Chronic Tinnitus Individuals: Treatment Response and Tinnitus Laterality
by Ourania Manta, Dimitris Kikidis, Winfried Schlee, Berthold Langguth, Birgit Mazurek, Jose A. Lopez-Escamez, Juan Martin-Lagos, Rilana Cima, Konstantinos Bromis, Eleftheria Vellidou, Zoi Zachou, Nikos Markatos, Evgenia Vassou, Ioannis Kouris, George K. Matsopoulos and Dimitrios D. Koutsouris
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(3), 760; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030760 - 24 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1243
Abstract
Background: This study investigates electrophysiological distinctions in auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) among individuals with chronic subjective tinnitus, with a specific focus on the impact of treatment response and tinnitus localisation. Methods: Early AEPs, known as Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR), and middle [...] Read more.
Background: This study investigates electrophysiological distinctions in auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) among individuals with chronic subjective tinnitus, with a specific focus on the impact of treatment response and tinnitus localisation. Methods: Early AEPs, known as Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR), and middle AEPs, termed Auditory Middle Latency Responses (AMLR), were analysed in tinnitus patients across four clinical centers in an attempt to verify increased neuronal activity, in accordance with the current tinnitus models. Our statistical analyses primarily focused on discrepancies in time–domain core features of ABR and AMLR signals, including amplitudes and latencies, concerning both treatment response and tinnitus laterality. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in ABR wave III and V latencies, ABR wave III peak amplitude, and AMLR wave Na and Nb amplitudes when comparing groups based on their response to treatment, accompanied by varying effect sizes. Conversely, when examining groups categorised by tinnitus laterality, no statistically significant differences emerged. Conclusions: These results provide valuable insights into the potential influence of treatment responses on AEPs. However, further research is imperative to attain a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms at play. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1889 KB  
Article
Normative Values of Brainstem Auditory-Evoked Responses in Sheep
by Katharina Suntinger, Adrian Dalbert, Lukas Prochazka, Milena Tegelkamp, Peter Kronen, Karina Klein, Christof Röösli, Alexander Huber and Flurin Pfiffner
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(1), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15010069 - 14 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1182
Abstract
Background: The brainstem auditory-evoked response (BAER) is an established electrophysiological measure of neural activity from the auditory nerve up to the brain stem. The BAER is used to diagnose abnormalities in auditory pathways and in neurophysiological human and animal research. However, normative data [...] Read more.
Background: The brainstem auditory-evoked response (BAER) is an established electrophysiological measure of neural activity from the auditory nerve up to the brain stem. The BAER is used to diagnose abnormalities in auditory pathways and in neurophysiological human and animal research. However, normative data for BAERs in sheep, which represent an adequate large animal model for translational and basic otological research, are lacking. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the function of the ovine auditory nervous system by determining normative values for the BAER and to compare sheep with human BAER data. Methods: In this retrospective study, BAER data for click stimuli at a range of sound pressure levels (SPLs) were analyzed. A series of 15 samples from six sheep with a mean age of 41.8 months was included. Results: The mean BAER threshold was 45.3 dB SPL. At 100 dB SPL, the mean (±standard deviation, SD) latency of wave V was 4.35 (±0.18) ms, that of wave III was 2.44 (±0.15) ms, and that of wave I was 0.88 (±0.13) ms. At 100 dB SPL, the mean interpeak latency of waves I–III was 1.56 (±0.18) ms, that of waves III–V was 1.91 (±0.16) ms, and that of waves I–V was 3.47 (±0.20) ms. The mean amplitudes at 100 dB SPL were 0.04 (±0.03) µV for wave I, 0.50 (±0.24) µV for wave III, and 0.40 (±0.25) µV for wave V. Conclusions: The normative values for sheep BAERs were reproducible and similar to those of humans. The normative BAER values further support sheep as an adequate animal model for otological research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3114 KB  
Article
Assessment of the Peripheral and Central Auditory System in Infants Whose Mothers Tested Positive for COVID-19 During Pregnancy
by Jheniffer Queiroz Raimundo, Milaine Dominici Sanfins, Piotr Henryk Skarzynski, Magdalena Beata Skarżyńska and Maria Francisca Colella-Santos
Children 2024, 11(12), 1527; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121527 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 2556
Abstract
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a new member of the coronavirus family. While respiratory transmission is the main route, concerns have arisen regarding possible vertical transmission, which refers to [...] Read more.
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a new member of the coronavirus family. While respiratory transmission is the main route, concerns have arisen regarding possible vertical transmission, which refers to the transmission of the virus from mother to fetus through the dissemination of viral particles in the amniotic fluid. Fetal viral infection via the placenta can affect the formation of the auditory system and lead to congenital hearing disorders. The aim of this research was to investigate the effects of vertical exposure to COVID-19 on the auditory system of newborns. Methodology: The study included a study group (SG) and a control group (CG). Selected during neonatal hearing screening, the SG consisted of 23 infants up to 1 year old whose mothers had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. The CG consisted of 15 infants whose mothers became pregnant after the end of the pandemic, had tested negative for COVID-19, and had no respiratory symptoms during pregnancy. The assessments for both groups were brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), tympanometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The research was divided into two studies, one cross-sectional and the other longitudinal. Results: All participants exhibited absolute latencies within the normal range for waves I, III, and V, although in the SG, there was a statistically significant increase in the latency of wave I in the left ear. In terms of OAEs, in the SG, there appeared to be a tendency for TEOAEs to be absent at high frequencies. Over several months, there was a general decrease in the amplitude of high-frequency responses in both TEOAEs and DPOAEs. Conclusion: No evidence was found that vertical exposure to COVID-19 causes hearing loss, although there were signs of possible deterioration in hair cell functioning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Neonatology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1518 KB  
Article
Tympanic Pre-Operative Electrically Evoked Auditory Late Response (TympEALR) as an Alternative to Trans-Tympanic Tests Using Anesthesia in Cochlear Implant Candidacy
by Daniel Polterauer, Maike Neuling and Florian Simon
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7573; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247573 - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1432
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Before a cochlear implant is considered, patients undergo various audiological tests to assess their suitability. One key test measures the auditory brainstem response (ABR) to acoustic stimuli. However, in some cases, even with maximum sound stimulation, no response is detected. Methods [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Before a cochlear implant is considered, patients undergo various audiological tests to assess their suitability. One key test measures the auditory brainstem response (ABR) to acoustic stimuli. However, in some cases, even with maximum sound stimulation, no response is detected. Methods: The promontory test involves electrical stimulation near the auditory nerve, allowing patients to associate the sensation. Ideally, the electrode is placed in the middle ear after opening the eardrum. This method, along with trans-tympanic electrically evoked ABR in local anesthesia (LA-TT-EABR) and the cortical equivalent (LA-TT-EALR), helps assess the auditory nerve’s existence and excitability. The TympEALR test, utilizing a “tympanic LA-TT-EALR”, provides an alternative measurement. Previous research has shown the possibility of deriving brainstem and cortical potentials through trans-tympanic electrical stimulation, allowing for objective assessment of the auditory nerve’s integrity and potentially objectifying patient sensations. Results: Sixteen patients have been tested using TympEALR. In seven of these, we found a positive response. The morphology was similar to other electrically evoked cortical auditory responses (EALR), e.g., using cochlear implants or trans-tympanic stimulation electrodes. We observed a higher influence of electrical artifacts than in other EALRs. Conclusions: TympEALR showed positive results in nearly half of the study participants, potentially avoiding invasive procedures. TympEALR can be a valuable alternative to trans-tympanic methods. More research is needed to determine if a negative result suggests against cochlear implantation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 527 KB  
Perspective
Making a Difference from Day One: The Urgent Need for Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening
by Michail Athanasopoulos, Pinelopi Samara, Georgios Batsaouras and Ioannis Athanasopoulos
Children 2024, 11(12), 1479; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121479 - 3 Dec 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2150
Abstract
Neonatal hearing screening (NHS) is a critical public health measure for early identification of hearing loss, ensuring timely access to interventions that can dramatically improve a child’s language development, cognitive abilities, and social inclusion. Beyond clinical benefits, NHS provides long-term advantages in education [...] Read more.
Neonatal hearing screening (NHS) is a critical public health measure for early identification of hearing loss, ensuring timely access to interventions that can dramatically improve a child’s language development, cognitive abilities, and social inclusion. Beyond clinical benefits, NHS provides long-term advantages in education and quality of life. Given that congenital hearing loss affects approximately 1–2 in every 1000 newborns worldwide, the case for universal screening is clear. Countries like the United States and Australia have successfully implemented NHS, leading to earlier diagnoses, improved language development, and better educational outcomes. In Europe, while many nations have adopted NHS, consistency remains a challenge. Countries such as Norway and the United Kingdom stand out for their well-established systems, whereas others, like Greece, have made notable progress but have yet to mandate NHS nationwide. This highlights the need for cohesive national policies across Europe to ensure universal coverage. Screening methods such as Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) are established tools for detecting hearing impairments in neonates. Despite their demonstrated efficacy, NHS remains inconsistent globally, particularly in low- and middle-income regions that lack mandatory policies or access to reliable screening technologies. This perspective advocates for the urgent need to make NHS mandatory in all countries, emphasizing its societal benefits and cost-effectiveness. Early diagnosis supports prompt intervention, like hearing aids or cochlear implants, which are most effective when implemented before six months. It also empowers families to make informed decisions, fosters educational inclusion, and mitigates the social and emotional challenges of undiagnosed hearing loss. Policymakers, healthcare providers, and international organizations must prioritize universal NHS to ensure no child is left behind due to unaddressed hearing loss. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 516 KB  
Article
Evaluation of the Peripheral and Central Auditory Systems in Children and Adolescents Before and After COVID-19 Infection
by Julia Siqueira, Milaine Dominici Sanfins, Piotr Henryk Skarzynski, Magdalena Beata Skarzynska and Maria Francisca Colella-Santos
Children 2024, 11(12), 1454; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121454 - 28 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1121
Abstract
COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. During and after COVID-19, audiovestibular symptoms and impairments have been reported. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impacts of COVID-19 on the peripheral and central auditory systems of children and adolescents following [...] Read more.
COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. During and after COVID-19, audiovestibular symptoms and impairments have been reported. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impacts of COVID-19 on the peripheral and central auditory systems of children and adolescents following the acute COVID-19 phase based on behavioral, electroacoustic, and electrophysiological audiological assessments. Methods: This is a primary, prospective, observational, and cross-sectional study of 23 children aged 8 to 15 years who acquired confirmed COVID-19 and who, before infection, had not had any auditory complaints or school complications. The results were compared with pre-pandemic data collected from a similar group of 23 children who had normal peripheral and central hearing and good school performance. Each participant answered a questionnaire about child development, school, and health history and underwent tests including pure-tone audiometry and high-frequency audiometry, imitanciometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. They also received tests of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials, Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials, Dichotic Digits Test, Sentence Identification Test, Dichotic Consonant–Vowel Test, Frequency Pattern Test, and Gaps-In-Noise Test. Results: Significant differences were observed between the groups, with the study group showing worse thresholds compared to the control group at both standard audiometric frequencies and at higher frequencies, although both groups were still within normal limits (p ≤ 0.05). In addition, the study group had a higher prevalence of absent responses, as identified by otoacoustic emissions and acoustic reflexes. In terms of central auditory performance, the study group showed ABRs with significantly longer latencies of waves I, III, and V compared to the control group. The study group also performed less well on the Dichotic Digits and Pediatric Speech Identification tests. Conclusions: COVID-19 appears to alter the auditory system, both peripherally at the level of the outer hair cells and more centrally. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3317 KB  
Article
Musicianship Modulates Cortical Effects of Attention on Processing Musical Triads
by Jessica MacLean, Elizabeth Drobny, Rose Rizzi and Gavin M. Bidelman
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(11), 1079; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14111079 - 29 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1403
Abstract
Background: Many studies have demonstrated the benefits of long-term music training (i.e., musicianship) on the neural processing of sound, including simple tones and speech. However, the effects of musicianship on the encoding of simultaneously presented pitches, in the form of complex musical [...] Read more.
Background: Many studies have demonstrated the benefits of long-term music training (i.e., musicianship) on the neural processing of sound, including simple tones and speech. However, the effects of musicianship on the encoding of simultaneously presented pitches, in the form of complex musical chords, is less well established. Presumably, musicians’ stronger familiarity and active experience with tonal music might enhance harmonic pitch representations, perhaps in an attention-dependent manner. Additionally, attention might influence chordal encoding differently across the auditory system. To this end, we explored the effects of long-term music training and attention on the processing of musical chords at the brainstem and cortical levels. Method: Young adult participants were separated into musician and nonmusician groups based on the extent of formal music training. While recording EEG, listeners heard isolated musical triads that differed only in the chordal third: major, minor, and detuned (4% sharper third from major). Participants were asked to correctly identify chords via key press during active stimulus blocks and watched a silent movie during passive blocks. We logged behavioral identification accuracy and reaction times and calculated information transfer based on the behavioral chord confusion patterns. EEG data were analyzed separately to distinguish between cortical (event-related potential, ERP) and subcortical (frequency-following response, FFR) evoked responses. Results: We found musicians were (expectedly) more accurate, though not faster, than nonmusicians in chordal identification. For subcortical FFRs, responses showed stimulus chord effects but no group differences. However, for cortical ERPs, whereas musicians displayed P2 (~150 ms) responses that were invariant to attention, nonmusicians displayed reduced P2 during passive listening. Listeners’ degree of behavioral information transfer (i.e., success in distinguishing chords) was also better in musicians and correlated with their neural differentiation of chords in the ERPs (but not high-frequency FFRs). Conclusions: Our preliminary results suggest long-term music training strengthens even the passive cortical processing of musical sounds, supporting more automated brain processing of musical chords with less reliance on attention. Our results also suggest that the degree to which listeners can behaviorally distinguish chordal triads is directly related to their neural specificity to musical sounds primarily at cortical rather than subcortical levels. FFR attention effects were likely not observed due to the use of high-frequency stimuli (>220 Hz), which restrict FFRs to brainstem sources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensory and Motor Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4062 KB  
Article
Molded Round Window Niche Implant as a Dexamethasone Delivery System in a Cochlear Implant-Trauma Animal Model
by Chunjiang Wei, Ziwen Gao, Robert Mau, Thomas Eickner, Gabor Jüttner, Nicklas Fiedler, Hermann Seitz, Thomas Lenarz and Verena Scheper
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(9), 1236; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16091236 - 23 Sep 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4698
Abstract
Background: Preserving residual hearing after cochlear implant (CI) surgery remains a crucial challenge. The application of dexamethasone (DEX) has been proven to positively affect residual hearing. To deliver DEX in a localized and controlled way, a round window niche implant (RNI), allowing drug [...] Read more.
Background: Preserving residual hearing after cochlear implant (CI) surgery remains a crucial challenge. The application of dexamethasone (DEX) has been proven to positively affect residual hearing. To deliver DEX in a localized and controlled way, a round window niche implant (RNI), allowing drug diffusion via the round window membrane into the cochlea, may be used. To prove this concept, an RNI for guinea pigs as a CI-trauma model was manufactured by molding and tested for its drug release in vitro and biological effects in vivo. Methods: The RNIs were molded using silicone containing 10% DEX. Release was analyzed over time using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Fourteen adult guinea pigs were randomly assigned to two groups (CI or CI + RNI group). All animals received a unilateral CI electrode insertion trauma followed by CI insertion. The CI + RNI group was additionally implanted with an RNI containing 10% DEX. Animals were followed up for 4 weeks. Acoustically evoked auditory brainstem response and impedance measurement, micro-computed tomography (µCT) imaging, and histology were performed for evaluation. Results: DEX was released for more than 250 days in vitro, with an initial burst followed by a slower release over time. Comparing the hearing threshold shift (from day 0 to day 28) of the CI and CI + RNI groups, significant differences were observed at 32 and 40 kHz. The impedance shift at basal contacts was lower in the CI + RNI group than in the CI group. Moreover, the fibrosis in the lower basal turn was reduced in the CI + RNI group in contrast to the CI group. Conclusions: The RNI containing 10% DEX has anti-inflammatory potential concerning fibrosis inhibition and has beneficial effects on hearing preservation at high frequencies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2881 KB  
Case Report
Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (dMRI) and Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Axonal Auditory Neuropathy: A Case Report
by Gary Rance, Raoul Wills, Andrew Kornberg and Julien Zanin
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3072; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113072 - 24 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1659
Abstract
Background: Progressive auditory dysfunction is common in patients with generalized neurodegenerative conditions, but clinicians currently lack the diagnostic tools to determine the location/degree of the pathology and, hence, to provide appropriate intervention. In this study, we present the white-matter microstructure measurements derived from [...] Read more.
Background: Progressive auditory dysfunction is common in patients with generalized neurodegenerative conditions, but clinicians currently lack the diagnostic tools to determine the location/degree of the pathology and, hence, to provide appropriate intervention. In this study, we present the white-matter microstructure measurements derived from a novel diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) technique in a patient with axonal auditory neuropathy and consider the findings in relation to the auditory intervention outcomes. Methods: We tracked the hearing changes in an adolescent with Riboflavin Transporter Deficiency (Type 2), evaluating the sound detection/discrimination, auditory evoked potentials, and both structural- and diffusion-weighted MRI findings over a 3-year period. In addition, we explored the effect of bilateral cochlear implantation in this individual. Results: Between the ages of 15 years and 18 years, the patient showed a complete loss of functional hearing ability. The auditory brainstem response testing indicated an auditory neuropathy with evidence of normal cochlear function but disrupted auditory neural activity. While three structural MRI assessments across this period showed a clinically normal cochleovestibular anatomy, the dMRI evaluation revealed a significant loss of fiber density consistent with axonopathy. The subsequent cochlear implant function was affected with the high levels of current required to elicit auditory sensations and concomitant vestibular and facial nerve stimulation issues. Conclusions: The case study demonstrates the ability of dMRI technologies to identify the subtle white-matter microstructure changes in the auditory pathway, which may disrupt the neural function in patients with auditory axonopathy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Journey of Hearing and Hearing-Related Disorders over Time)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1597 KB  
Case Report
Remediation of Perceptual Deficits in Progressive Auditory Neuropathy: A Case Study
by Gary Rance, Dani Tomlin, Eppie M. Yiu and Julien Zanin
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 2127; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13072127 - 6 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2189
Abstract
Background: Auditory neuropathy (AN) is a hearing disorder that affects neural activity in the VIIIth cranial nerve and central auditory pathways. Progressive forms have been reported in a number of neurodegenerative diseases and may occur as a result of both the deafferentiation and [...] Read more.
Background: Auditory neuropathy (AN) is a hearing disorder that affects neural activity in the VIIIth cranial nerve and central auditory pathways. Progressive forms have been reported in a number of neurodegenerative diseases and may occur as a result of both the deafferentiation and desynchronisation of neuronal processes. The purpose of this study was to describe changes in auditory function over time in a patient with axonal neuropathy and to explore the effect of auditory intervention. Methods: We tracked auditory function in a child with progressive AN associated with Charcot–Marie–Tooth (Type 2C) disease, evaluating hearing levels, auditory-evoked potentials, and perceptual abilities over a 3-year period. Furthermore, we explored the effect of auditory intervention on everyday listening and neuroplastic development. Results: While sound detection thresholds remained constant throughout, both electrophysiologic and behavioural evidence suggested auditory neural degeneration over the course of the study. Auditory brainstem response amplitudes were reduced, and perception of auditory timing cues worsened over time. Functional hearing ability (speech perception in noise) also deteriorated through the first 1.5 years of study until the child was fitted with a “remote-microphone” listening device, which subsequently improved binaural processing and restored speech perception ability to normal levels. Conclusions: Despite the deterioration of auditory neural function consistent with peripheral axonopathy, sustained experience with the remote-microphone listening system appeared to produce neuroplastic changes, which improved the patient’s everyday listening ability—even when not wearing the device. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Journey of Hearing and Hearing-Related Disorders over Time)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 4575 KB  
Case Report
Cochlear Implantation in a Patient with Implanted Trigeminus Stimulator—Clinical Considerations for Using Two Different Electrical Stimulators in the Same Patient and Our Results
by Daniel Polterauer, Maike Neuling, Sophia Stoecklein and Joachim Mueller
J. Otorhinolaryngol. Hear. Balance Med. 2024, 5(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/ohbm5010002 - 31 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2243
Abstract
Implantation of two electrical stimulators of different cranial nerves in one patient is rare. We report the case of a forty-seven-year-old patient already implanted with a trigeminus nerve stimulator. In addition, this patient suffered from hearing problems. In one ear, the patient was [...] Read more.
Implantation of two electrical stimulators of different cranial nerves in one patient is rare. We report the case of a forty-seven-year-old patient already implanted with a trigeminus nerve stimulator. In addition, this patient suffered from hearing problems. In one ear, the patient was deaf. On the other side, the patient wore a bone conduction hearing aid to improve hearing. In this complex situation, we decided to check the possibility of cochlear implantation on the deaf side. Finally, we managed to provide electrical stimulation of the auditory pathway of the deaf ear to improve the patient’s hearing tests. In addition, this case report shows how the trigeminus stimulator interferes with the electrical stimulation in auditory evoked potentials measurement of the auditory brainstem and cortex via EABR (evoked auditory brainstem response) resp. EALR (evoked auditory late response). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2015 KB  
Article
Exploring Electrode Placements to Optimize the Identification and Measurement of Early Auditory Evoked Potentials
by Kailyn A. McFarlane and Jason Tait Sanchez
Audiol. Res. 2023, 13(6), 978-988; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13060085 - 11 Dec 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3807
Abstract
Cochlear synaptic loss (termed cochlear synaptopathy) has been suggested to contribute to suprathreshold hearing difficulties. However, its existence and putative effects in humans remain inconclusive, largely due to the heterogeneous methods used across studies to indirectly evaluate the health of cochlear synapses. There [...] Read more.
Cochlear synaptic loss (termed cochlear synaptopathy) has been suggested to contribute to suprathreshold hearing difficulties. However, its existence and putative effects in humans remain inconclusive, largely due to the heterogeneous methods used across studies to indirectly evaluate the health of cochlear synapses. There is a need to standardize proxies of cochlear synaptopathy to appropriately compare and interpret findings across studies. Early auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), including the compound action potential (AP)/Wave I of the auditory brainstem response are a popular proxy, yet remain variable based on technical considerations. This study evaluated one such consideration—electrode array (i.e., montage)—to optimize the use of early AEP waveforms. In 35 young adults, electrocochleography (ECochG) responses were collected using vertical and horizontal montages. Standard ECochG measures and AP/Wave I and Wave II peak-to-trough amplitudes and latencies were compared between montages. Vertical montage recordings consistently produced significantly larger AP/Wave I peak-to-trough amplitudes compared to horizontal recordings. These findings support the use of a vertical electrode montage for optimal recordings of peripheral cochlear nerve activity. As cochlear synaptopathy continues to be explored in humans, the methods highlighted here should be considered in the development of a standardized assessment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 894 KB  
Article
Hearing Loss and Risk Factors in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
by Simonetta Frezza, Eloisa Tiberi, Mirta Corsello, Francesca Priolo, Francesco Cota, Piero Catenazzi, Guido Conti, Simonetta Costa and Giovanni Vento
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(24), 7583; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12247583 - 8 Dec 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3539
Abstract
The incidence of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is still high in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. The purpose of our study was to provide the prevalence rates of SNHL and to analyze the risk factors of hearing impairment and changes in hearing [...] Read more.
The incidence of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is still high in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. The purpose of our study was to provide the prevalence rates of SNHL and to analyze the risk factors of hearing impairment and changes in hearing thresholds in a cohort of VLBW infants. A retrospective observational study was conducted in our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 2012 to 2016. All VLBW infants included were screened by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR). In total, we enrolled 316 infants and SNHL was diagnosed in 68, leading to an early incidence of 21.5% as 36 infants out of 68 improved. Finally, SNHL was confirmed in 20 patients (6.3%) who needed hearing aids. They were significantly smaller, sicker, had longer hospitalizations, and received more ototoxic therapies. Logistic regression analysis showed that gestational age (GA) influenced the association between drugs and SNHL. The results underlined how the total exposure to antibiotics is significantly associated with SNHL, even after GA correction. In conclusion, GA, birth weight and, above all, the length and complexity of NICU stay quantify the risk of SNHL and should be considered at the individual level for parent counseling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Syndromic and Non-syndromic Hearing Loss: From Diagnosis to Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 272 KB  
Article
The Effects of Stimulus Repetition Rate on Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Potentials in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients
by Oliver C. Dziemba, Tina Brzoska, Thomas Hocke and Friedrich Ihler
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(22), 7188; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227188 - 20 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1579
Abstract
Background: By using outcome prediction scores, it is possible to distinguish between good and poor performers with cochlear implants (CI) after CI implantation. The reasons for poor performance, despite good basic conditions, can be manifold. On the one hand, the postoperative fitting may [...] Read more.
Background: By using outcome prediction scores, it is possible to distinguish between good and poor performers with cochlear implants (CI) after CI implantation. The reasons for poor performance, despite good basic conditions, can be manifold. On the one hand, the postoperative fitting may be inadequate; on the other, neurophysiological disease processes may impair speech understanding with a CI. These disease processes are not yet fully understood. In acoustics, it is known that the auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and their latencies and amplitudes allow differential diagnosis based on reference values for normal-hearing individuals. The aim of this study was to provide reference values for electrically evoked brainstem responses (EABRs) in terms of rate-dependent latencies and amplitudes. Methods: 20 ears of 18 experienced adult CI recipients with a predicted and measured good postoperative word recognition score were recruited from the clinic’s patient pool. In the same stimulation mode and intensity we measured latencies and interpeak-latencies of EABRs and electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs). With a defined supra-threshold stimulation intensity above the individual ECAP threshold, we applied stimulation at several rates between 11 and 91 stimuli per second. Results: We found rate dependences for EABR latency t3 and t5 in the order of 0.19 ms and 0.37 ms, respectively, while ECAP was not affected by rate. Correspondingly, the interpeak intervals’ rate dependences for t5t1, t5t3 and t3t1 were of the order of 0.37 ms, 0.18 ms and 0.19 ms. Comparing the EABR amplitudes between the stimulation rates 11/s and 81/s, we found that at 81/s the amplitudes were significantly reduced down: to 73% for A3 and 81% for A5. These rate dependences of latency and amplitude in EABR have characteristics comparable to those of acoustic ABR. Conclusions: These data may serve to provide reference values for EABR and ECAP latencies, interpeak intervals and amplitudes with respect to stimulation rate. Altered response patterns of ECAPs and EABRs to normalised stimulation modes could be used in the future to describe and classify neuropathological processes in a better-differentiated way. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop