Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = bivariate flood frequency curve

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
7 pages, 1753 KiB  
Proceeding Paper
Bivariate Analysis with Synthetic Hydrograph Shapes for Hydrological Dam Safety Assessment
by Daniel Carril-Rojas and Luis Mediero
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 25(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECWS-7-14175 - 14 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1187
Abstract
Hydrological dam safety analyses should assess the frequency curve of maximum reservoir water levels in flood events by routing a large set of inflow hydrographs. Therefore, stochastic bivariate analyses are used. Hydrograph shapes obtained by using hydrometeorological simulations are required for each flood [...] Read more.
Hydrological dam safety analyses should assess the frequency curve of maximum reservoir water levels in flood events by routing a large set of inflow hydrographs. Therefore, stochastic bivariate analyses are used. Hydrograph shapes obtained by using hydrometeorological simulations are required for each flood peak-hydrograph volume pair. Hydrograph shapes depend on hyetograph shapes. A sensitivity analysis is required to select the appropriate hyetograph shape, focusing on the influence of the hyetograph time step on the hydrograph shape. In this study, the Cuerda del Pozo Dam in central Spain is selected as a case study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 7th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 6327 KiB  
Article
Integrated Framework for Detecting the Areas Prone to Flooding Generated by Flash-Floods in Small River Catchments
by Romulus Costache, Alina Barbulescu and Quoc Bao Pham
Water 2021, 13(6), 758; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13060758 - 11 Mar 2021
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 3572
Abstract
In the present study, the susceptibility to flash-floods and flooding was studied across the Izvorul Dorului River basin in Romania. In the first phase, three ensemble models were used to determine the susceptibility to flash-floods. These models were generated by a combination of [...] Read more.
In the present study, the susceptibility to flash-floods and flooding was studied across the Izvorul Dorului River basin in Romania. In the first phase, three ensemble models were used to determine the susceptibility to flash-floods. These models were generated by a combination of three statistical bivariate methods, namely frequency ratio (FR), weights of evidence (WOE), and statistical index (SI), with fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). The result obtained from the application of the FAHP-WOE model had the best performance highlighted by an Area Under Curve—Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUC-ROC) value of 0.837 for the training sample and another of 0.79 for the validation sample. Furthermore, the results offered by FAHP-WOE were weighted on the river network level using the flow accumulation method, through which the valleys with a medium, high, and very high torrential susceptibility were identified. Based on these valleys’ locations, the susceptibility to floods was estimated. Thus, in the first stage, a buffer zone of 200 m was delimited around the identified valleys along which the floods could occur. Once the buffer zone was established, ten flood conditioning factors were used to determine the flood susceptibility through the analytical hierarchy process model. Approximately 25% of the total delimited area had a high and very high flood susceptibility. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessing Water Quality by Statistical Methods)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 5656 KiB  
Article
Dependence Between Extreme Rainfall Events and the Seasonality and Bivariate Properties of Floods. A Continuous Distributed Physically-Based Approach
by Ivan Gabriel-Martin, Alvaro Sordo-Ward, Luis Garrote and Juan T. García
Water 2019, 11(9), 1896; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091896 - 11 Sep 2019
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3797
Abstract
This paper focuses on proposing the minimum number of storms necessary to derive the extreme flood hydrographs accurately through event-based modelling. To do so, we analyzed the results obtained by coupling a continuous stochastic weather generator (the Advanced WEather GENerator) with a continuous [...] Read more.
This paper focuses on proposing the minimum number of storms necessary to derive the extreme flood hydrographs accurately through event-based modelling. To do so, we analyzed the results obtained by coupling a continuous stochastic weather generator (the Advanced WEather GENerator) with a continuous distributed physically-based hydrological model (the TIN-based real-time integrated basin simulator), and by simulating 5000 years of hourly flow at the basin outlet. We modelled the outflows in a basin named Peacheater Creek located in Oklahoma, USA. Afterwards, we separated the independent rainfall events within the 5000 years of hourly weather forcing, and obtained the flood event associated to each storm from the continuous hourly flow. We ranked all the rainfall events within each year according to three criteria: Total depth, maximum intensity, and total duration. Finally, we compared the flood events obtained from the continuous simulation to those considering the N highest storm events per year according to the three criteria and by focusing on four different aspects: Magnitude and recurrence of the maximum annual peak-flow and volume, seasonality of floods, dependence among maximum peak-flows and volumes, and bivariate return periods. The main results are: (a) Considering the five largest total depth storms per year generates the maximum annual peak-flow and volume, with a probability of 94% and 99%, respectively and, for return periods higher than 50 years, the probability increases to 99% in both cases; (b) considering the five largest total depth storms per year the seasonality of flood is reproduced with an error of less than 4% and (c) bivariate properties between the peak-flow and volume are preserved, with an error on the estimation of the copula fitted of less than 2%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Hydrological Extremes: Floods and Droughts)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop