Search Results (45)

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a significant complication of cancer immunotherapy, with emerging evidence suggesting distinct pathophysiological mechanisms compared to traditional chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. This narrative review examines the epidemiology and pathogenesis of VTE in patients receiving immunotherapies for cancer including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), among others. Real-world studies demonstrate a wide range of VTE incidence rates in ICI recipients, with potential mechanisms including exacerbated underlying interleukin-8-mediated inflammatory pathways and consequent neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. CAR T-cell therapy is associated with unique hemostatic challenges, including concurrent thrombotic and bleeding risks related to cytokine release syndrome. Current risk assessment tools show limited predictive utility in patients receiving immunotherapies for cancer, highlighting the need for novel stratification models. Future research priorities include developing immunotherapy-specific risk prediction tools, elucidating mechanistic pathways linking immune activation to thrombosis, and establishing evidence-based and tailored thromboprophylaxis strategies. As cancer immunotherapy continues to evolve, understanding and mitigating thrombotic complications remains crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. Full article

Background/Objectives: The physiological activation of cytotoxic CD8^pos T cells (CTLs) relies on the engagement of the TCR/CD3 complex with cognate peptide-HLA class I (pHLA-I) on target cells, triggering cell lysis with appropriate cytokine release and minimized off-target toxicity. In contrast, current immunotherapies for CD19-expressing hematological malignancies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs), bypass TCR/pHLA interactions, resulting in CTL hyperactivation and excessive cytokine release, which frequently cause severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Thus, there is a pressing need for T cell-based therapies that preserve physiological activation while maintaining antitumor efficacy. Methods: To address this, we developed CD19-ReTARG^TPR, a novel fusion protein consisting of the immunodominant cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65-derived peptide TPRVTGGAM (TPR) covalently presented by a soluble HLA-B*07:02/β2-microglobulin complex fused to a high-affinity CD19-targeting Fab antibody fragment. The treatment of CD19-expressing cancer cells with CD19-ReTARG^TPR makes them recognizable for pre-existing anti-CMV_pp65 CTLs via physiological TCR-pHLA engagement. Results: Our preclinical data demonstrate that CD19-ReTARG^TPR efficiently redirects anti-CMV CTLs to eliminate CD19-expressing cancer cells, including both established cell lines and primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. Unlike CD19-directed CAR T cells or the CD19/CD3 BiTE blinatumomab, CD19-ReTARG^TPR mediated robust cytotoxic activity without triggering supraphysiological cytokine release. Importantly, this approach retained efficacy even against cancer cells with low CD19 expression. Conclusions: In summary, we provide a robust proof-of-concept study and show that CD19-ReTARG^TPR offers a promising alternative strategy for T cell redirection, enabling the selective and effective killing of CD19-expressing malignancies while minimizing cytokine-driven toxicities through physiological CTL activation pathways. Full article

Background: Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) is a hyperinflammatory state triggered by immune therapies like CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs). Characterized by excessive cytokine release, CRS often mimics infectious and inflammatory conditions, complicating diagnosis and treatment. Immunosuppressive therapies used for CRS further elevate the risk of secondary infections. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE was conducted using terms related to “cytokine release syndrome”, “cytokine storm”, “infections”, and “management”. Studies were included if they described infectious complications, diagnostic mimics, or therapeutic approaches related to CRS. Results: Of 19,634 studies, 2572 abstracts were reviewed. Infections occurred in up to 23% of patients post-CAR T therapy and 24% post-BiTE therapy. Pathogens included gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, herpesviruses (e.g., CMV, HSV), fungi (e.g., Candida, Aspergillus), and parasites (e.g., Toxoplasma gondii). CRS mimics also included non-infectious inflammatory syndromes. Differentiation remains challenging, but cytokine profiling and biomarkers (e.g., ferritin, CRP, sIL-2Rα) may aid in diagnosis. Treatments included tocilizumab, corticosteroids, and empiric antimicrobials. Prophylactic strategies were inconsistently reported. Conclusions: Effective CRS management requires early recognition, differentiation from infectious mimics, and collaboration between oncology and infectious disease (ID) specialists. A multidisciplinary, collaborative, and structured approach, including dedicated ID input and pre-treatment evaluation, is essential for optimizing CRS management and patient outcomes. Full article

Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE), has shown substantial efficacy in treating both relapsed/refractory (R/R) Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). With its targeted mechanism of action, favorable safety profile, and ability to induce deep molecular remissions, blinatumomab is increasingly incorporated into frontline treatment regimens for B-ALL. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved its use in the frontline setting for Ph-negative ALL. In Ph-negative ALL, combining blinatumomab with intensive chemotherapy has resulted in superior measurable residual disease (MRD) clearance and improved long-term outcomes. In Ph-positive ALL, combination therapies involving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), particularly ponatinib and blinatumomab, are challenging the traditional approach of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). This review explores the current evidence supporting the frontline use of blinatumomab in newly diagnosed adults with B-ALL, its impact on treatment paradigms, and potential future directions, including novel combination therapies and the role of emerging immunotherapeutic approaches. Full article

Immune cell engagers (ICEs) are an emerging class of immunotherapies designed to harness the immune system’s anti-tumor potential through precise targeting and activation of immune effector cells. By engaging T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and phagocytes, ICEs overcome challenges such as immune evasion and MHC downregulation, addressing critical barriers in cancer treatment. T-cell engagers (TCEs), led by bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), dominate the field, with innovations such as half-life-extended BiTEs, trispecific antibodies, and checkpoint inhibitory T-cell engagers driving their application in hematologic and solid malignancies. NK cell engagers (NKCEs) and phagocyte cell engagers (PCEs) are rapidly progressing, drawing on NK cells’ innate cytotoxicity and macrophages’ phagocytic abilities to target tumors, particularly in immunosuppressive microenvironments. Since the FDA approval of Blinatumomab in 2014, ICEs have transformed the oncology landscape, with nine FDA-approved products and numerous candidates in clinical trials. Despite challenges such as toxicity, resistance, and limited efficacy in solid tumors, ongoing research into advanced platforms and combination therapies highlights the growing potential of ICEs to provide personalized, scalable, and effective cancer treatments. This review investigates the mechanisms, platforms, research trends, and clinical progress of ICEs, emphasizing their pivotal role in advancing precision immunotherapy and their promise as a cornerstone of next-generation cancer therapies. Full article

Backgroud: The introduction of highly active immunotherapies has changed the outcome of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHLs) in the last two decades. Since then, important progress has been shown using newer and more active immunotherapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), conjugated monoclonal antibodies, and bispecific antobodies, which currently plays a significant role in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), follicular (FL), and mantle cell (MCL) lymphoma. Purpose: In this review, we provide an updated overview of recently completed and ongoing BsAb trials in patients with relapsed/refractory(R/R) B-NHL and Hodgkin’s lymphoma, including single-agent results, emerging combinations, safety data, and novel constructs. Conclusions: Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are a novel class of “off-the-shelf” T-cell-redirecting drugs capable of targeting various cell-surface antigens. New antigen targets are currently under investigation, such as CD19 × CD3 and CD30 × CD3 or CD30 × CD16, in different settings. BsAbs are among the most promising therapeutic options for lymphoma today since they have demonstrated significant single-agent activity, along with a manageable toxicity profile, in patients with heavily pretreated B-NHL. Full article

Background: Despite the progress achieved regarding survival rates in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapsed or refractory disease still poses a therapeutic challenge. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a CD22-directed monoclonal antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, which has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for adults and pediatric patients 1 year and older with relapsed or refractory CD22-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Case presentation: Herein, we present the case of a 23-month-old girl with high-risk B-ALL who experienced very early isolated medullary relapse; following the failure of conventional chemotherapy according to the ALL-IC REL 2016 protocol, she went on to receive the bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) blinatumomab and subsequently, due to refractory disease, the combination of fludarabine, cytarabine, and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib without achieving remission. Given the high CD22 expression by the lymphoblasts, off-label use of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) was chosen and administrated in a 28-day cycle as a salvage treatment. The minimal residual disease (MRD) was 0.08% on day 28, and InO was continued, thus achieving MRD negativity; the patient successfully underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplantation from a matched family donor. Conclusions: Our case highlights the efficacy and safety of InO as a salvage treatment in the setting of relapsed B-ALL refractory not only to conventional chemotherapy but also to novel treatments, such as blinatumomab and bortezomib. Full article

For the monitoring of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, antigen-based CAR detection methods are usually applied. However, for each target-antigen, a separate detection system is required. Furthermore, when monitored CAR T-cells in the blood of patients treated with bispecific antibodies or T-cell engagers (bsAbs/BiTEs) recognize the same antigen, these methods produce false-positive results in clinical diagnostics. Anti-CAR-linker monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the linker sequence between the variable domains of the antigen binding CAR fragment promise a universal and unbiased CAR detection. To test this, we analyzed clinical specimens of all BCMA- and CD19-targeting CAR T-cell products currently approved for clinical use. We found a highly specific and sensitive CAR detection using anti-CAR-linker mAb in blood cells from patients treated with Ide-cel, Tisa-cel, Axi-cel, Brexu-cel, and Liso-cel. For Ide-cel and Tisa-cel, the sensitivity was significantly lower compared to that for antigen-based CAR detection assays. Strikingly, the specificity of anti-CAR linker mAb was not affected by the simultaneous presence of bispecific blinatumomab or teclistamab for Axi-cel, Brexu-cel, Liso-cel, or Ide-cel, respectively. Cilta-cel (containing a monomeric G₄S-CAR linker) could not be detected by anti-CAR linker mAb. In conclusion, anti-CAR-linker mAbs are highly specific and useful for CAR T-cell monitoring but are not universally applicable. Full article

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a novel anticancer therapy using autologous or allogeneic T-cells. To date, six CAR-T therapies for specific B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), and multiple myeloma (MM) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Significant barriers to the effectiveness of CAR-T therapy include cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity in the case of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (Allo-SCT) graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), antigen escape, modest antitumor activity, restricted trafficking, limited persistence, the immunosuppressive microenvironment, and senescence and exhaustion of CAR-Ts. Furthermore, cancer drug resistance remains a major problem in clinical practice. CAR-T therapy, in combination with checkpoint blockades and bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) or other drugs, appears to be an appealing anticancer strategy. Many of these agents have shown impressive results, combining efficacy with tolerability. Biomarkers like extracellular vesicles (EVs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor (ctDNA) and miRNAs may play an important role in toxicity, relapse assessment, and efficacy prediction, and can be implicated in clinical applications of CAR-T therapy and in establishing safe and efficacious personalized medicine. However, further research is required to fully comprehend the particular side effects of immunomodulation, to ascertain the best order and combination of this medication with conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapies, and to find reliable predictive biomarkers. Full article

Human cytomegalovirus is a ubiquitous herpesvirus that, while latent in most individuals, poses a great risk to immunocompromised patients. In contrast to directly acting traditional antiviral drugs, such as ganciclovir, we aim to emulate a physiological infection control using T cells. For this, we constructed several bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) constructs targeting different viral glycoproteins of the murine cytomegalovirus and evaluated them in vitro for their efficacy. To isolate the target specific effect without viral immune evasion, we established stable reporter cell lines expressing the viral target glycoprotein B, and the glycoprotein complexes gN-gM and gH-gL, as well as nano-luciferase (nLuc). First, we evaluated binding capacities using flow cytometry and established killing assays, measuring nLuc-release upon cell lysis. All BiTE constructs proved to be functional mediators for T-cell recruitment and will allow a proof of concept for this treatment option. This might pave the way for strikingly safer immunosuppression in vulnerable patient groups. Full article

Despite the availability of target drugs in the first and second line, only 30% of FLT3mut AMLs are cured. Among the multiple mechanisms of resistance, those of FLT3mut LSC are the most difficult to eradicate because of their metabolic and genomic characteristics. Reactivation of glycogen synthesis, inhibition of the RAS/MAPK pathway, and degradation of FLT3 may be potential aids to fight the resistance of LSC to FLT3i. LSC is also characterized by the expression of a CD34+/CD25+/CD123+/CD99+ immunophenotype. The receptor and ligand of FLT3, the natural killer group 2 member D ligand (NKGD2L), and CD123 are some of the targets of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), bispecific T-cell engager molecules (BiTEs), CAR-NK and nanoparticles recently designed and reported here. The combination of these new therapeutic options, hopefully in a minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven approach, could provide the future answer to the challenge of treating FLT3mut AML. Full article

Recent advancements in cancer immunotherapy have made directing the cellular immune response onto cancer cells a promising strategy for the treatment of hematological malignancies. The introduction of monoclonal antibody-based (mAbs) targeted therapy has significantly improved the prognosis for hematological patients. Facing the issues of mAb-based therapies, a novel bispecific antibody (BsAb) format was developed. T-cell engagers (TCEs) are BsAbs, which simultaneously target tumor-associated antigens on tumor cells and CD3 molecules present on T-cells. This mechanism allows for the direct activation of T-cells and their anti-tumor features, ultimately resulting in the lysis of tumor cells. In 2014, the FDA approved blinatumomab, a TCE directed to CD3 and CD19 for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Since then, numerous TCEs have been developed, allowing for treating different hematological malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. As of November 2023, seven clinically approved TCE therapies are on the market. TCE-based therapies still have their limitations; however, improving the properties of TCEs, as well as combining TCE-based therapies with other forms of treatment, give hope to find the cures for currently terminal diseases. In this paper, we summarized the technical basis of the TCE technology, its application in hematology, and its current issues and prospects. Full article

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma. Approximately 60% of patients are cured with R-CHOP as a frontline treatment, while the remaining patients experience primary refractory or relapsed disease (R/R). The prognosis for R/R DLBCL patients who are neither eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantations nor CAR-T-cell treatment is poor, representing an important unmet need. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have dramatically improved therapeutic options in anti-cancer strategies, offering new opportunities to overcome chemo-refractoriness in this challenging disease, even in cases of primary non-responder DLBCL. Several novel mAbs, characterized by different mechanisms of action and targets, are now available for R/R DLBCL. Unbound mAbs induce an immune response against cancer cells, triggering different mechanisms, including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), activation of antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) and radioimmunotherapy (RIT), respectively, deliver a cytotoxic payload or a beta-emitter radionuclide to the targeted cells and nearby bystanders. Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTes) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) redirect and enhance the immune response against tumor cells. Here, we review therapeutic strategies based on monoclonal antibodies for R/R DLBCL. Full article

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. The prognosis is extremely poor even with standard treatment of maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Recurrence is inevitable within months, and treatment options are very limited. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) and bispecific T-cell engagers (TCEs) are two emerging immunotherapies that can redirect T-cells for tumor-specific killing and have shown remarkable success in hematological malignancies and been under extensive study for application in glioblastoma. While there have been multiple clinical trials showing preliminary evidence of safety and efficacy for CART, bispecific TCEs are still in the early stages of clinical testing, with preclinical studies showing very promising results. However, there are multiple shared challenges that need to be addressed in the future, including the route of delivery, antigen escape, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and toxicity resulting from the limited choice of tumor-specific antigens. Efforts are underway to optimize the design of both these treatments and find the ideal combination therapy to overcome these challenges. In this review, we describe the work that has been performed as well as novel approaches in glioblastoma and in other solid tumors that may be applicable in the future. Full article

Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) and bispecific antibodies (BiAbs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape of hematological malignancies. By directing T cells towards specific tumor antigens, BiTEs and BiAbs facilitate the T-cell-mediated lysis of neoplastic cells. The success of blinatumomab, a CD19xCD3 BiTE, in acute lymphoblastic leukemia spearheaded the expansive development of BiTEs/BiAbs in the context of hematological neoplasms. Nearly a decade later, numerous BiTEs/BiAbs targeting a range of tumor-associated antigens have transpired in the treatment of multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, acute myelogenous leukemia, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, despite their generally favorable safety profiles, particular toxicities such as infections, cytokine release syndrome, myelosuppression, and neurotoxicity after BiAb/BiTE therapy raise valid concerns. Moreover, target antigen loss and the immunosuppressive microenvironment of hematological neoplasms facilitate resistance towards BiTEs/BiAbs. This review aims to highlight the most recent evidence from clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of BiAbs/BiTEs. Additionally, the review will provide mechanistic insights into the limitations of BiAbs whilst outlining practical applications and strategies to overcome these limitations. Full article