Due to scheduled maintenance work on our servers, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 11:00 and 12:00 CEST on March 28th.
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = biofidelic sensor

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 3113 KB  
Article
Development of the Biofidelic Instrumented Neck Surrogate (BINS) with Tunable Stiffness and Embedded Kinematic Sensors for Application in Static Tests and Low-Energy Impacts
by Giuseppe Zullo, Elisa Baldoin, Leonardo Marin, Andrey Koptyug and Nicola Petrone
Sensors 2025, 25(16), 4925; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25164925 - 9 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1071
Abstract
Road accidents could result in severe or fatal neck injuries. A few surrogate necks are available to develop and test neck protectors as countermeasures, but each has its own limitations. The objective of this study was to develop a surrogate neck compatible with [...] Read more.
Road accidents could result in severe or fatal neck injuries. A few surrogate necks are available to develop and test neck protectors as countermeasures, but each has its own limitations. The objective of this study was to develop a surrogate neck compatible with the Hybrid III dummy, focused on tunable flexural stiffness and integrated angular sensors for kinematic feedback during impact tests. The neck features six 3D-printed surrogate vertebral bodies interconnected by rubber surrogate discs, providing a baseline flexibility to the surrogate fundamental spinal units. An adjustable inner cable and elastic elements hooked on the sides of vertebral elements allow to increase the flexural stiffness of the surrogate and to simulate the asymmetric behavior of the human neck. Neck flexural angles and axial compression are measured using a novel system made of wires, pulleys, and rotary potentiometers embedded in the neck base. A motion capture system and a load cell were used to determine the bending and torsional stiffness of the neck and to calibrate the sensors. Results showed that the neck flexural stiffness can be tuned between 3.29 and 5.76 Nm/rad. Torsional stiffness was 1.01 Nm/rad and compression stiffness can be tuned from 39 to 193 N/mm. Sensor flexural angles were compared with motion capture angles, showing an RMSE error of 1.35° during static testing and of 3° during dynamic testing. The developed neck could be a viable tool for investigating neck braces from a kinematic and kinetic perspective due to its inbuilt sensing ability and its tunable stiffness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Body Worn Sensors and Wearables)
Show Figures

Figure 1

41 pages, 2797 KB  
Systematic Review
Assessing Safety in Physical Human–Robot Interaction in Industrial Settings: A Systematic Review of Contact Modelling and Impact Measuring Methods
by Samarathunga S. M. B. P. B., Marcello Valori, Giovanni Legnani and Irene Fassi
Robotics 2025, 14(3), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics14030027 - 28 Feb 2025
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 9147
Abstract
As collaborative robots (cobots) increasingly share workspaces with humans, ensuring safe physical human–robot interaction (pHRI) has become paramount. This systematic review addresses safety assessment in pHRI, focussing on the industrial field, with the objective of collecting approaches and practices developed so far for [...] Read more.
As collaborative robots (cobots) increasingly share workspaces with humans, ensuring safe physical human–robot interaction (pHRI) has become paramount. This systematic review addresses safety assessment in pHRI, focussing on the industrial field, with the objective of collecting approaches and practices developed so far for modelling, simulating, and verifying possible collisions in human–robot collaboration (HRC). To this aim, advances in human–robot collision modelling and test-based safety evaluation over the last fifteen years were examined, identifying six main categories: human body modelling, robot modelling, collision modelling, determining safe limits, approaches for evaluating human–robot contact, and biofidelic sensor development. Despite the reported advancements, several persistent challenges were identified, including the over-reliance on simplified quasi-static models, insufficient exploration of transient contact dynamics, and a lack of inclusivity in demographic data for establishing safety thresholds. This analysis also underscores the limitations of the biofidelic sensors currently used and the need for standardised validation protocols for the impact scenarios identified through risk assessment. By providing a comprehensive overview of the topic, this review aims to inspire researchers to address underexplored areas and foster innovation in developing advanced, but suitable, models to simulate human–robot contact and technologies and methodologies for reliable and user-friendly safety validation approaches. Further deepening those topics, even combined with each other, will bring about the twofold effect of easing the implementation while increasing the safety of robotic applications characterised by pHRI. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Industrial Robots and Automation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 6000 KB  
Article
Considerations on the Dynamics of Biofidelic Sensors in the Assessment of Human–Robot Impacts
by S. M. B. P. B. Samarathunga, Marcello Valori, Rodolfo Faglia, Irene Fassi and Giovanni Legnani
Machines 2024, 12(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines12010026 - 30 Dec 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2919
Abstract
Ensuring the safety of physical human–robot interaction (pHRI) is of utmost importance for industries and organisations seeking to incorporate robots into their workspaces. To address this concern, the ISO/TS 15066:2016 outlines hazard analysis and preventive measures for ensuring safety in Human–Robot Collaboration (HRC). [...] Read more.
Ensuring the safety of physical human–robot interaction (pHRI) is of utmost importance for industries and organisations seeking to incorporate robots into their workspaces. To address this concern, the ISO/TS 15066:2016 outlines hazard analysis and preventive measures for ensuring safety in Human–Robot Collaboration (HRC). To analyse human–robot contact, it is common practice to separately evaluate the “transient” and “quasi-static” contact phases. Accurately measuring transient forces during close human–robot collaboration requires so-called “biofidelic” sensors that closely mimic human tissue properties, featuring adequate bandwidth and balanced damping. The dynamics of physical human–robot interactions using biofidelic measuring devices are being explored in this research. In this paper, one biofidelic sensor is tested to analyse its dynamic characteristics and identify the main factors influencing its performance and its practical applications for testing. To this aim, sensor parameters, such as natural frequency and damping coefficient, are estimated by utilising a custom physical pendulum setup to impact the sensor. Mathematical models developed to characterise the sensor system and pendulum dynamics are also disclosed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 967 KB  
Proceeding Paper
A Novel Instrumented Human Head Surrogate for the Impact Evaluation of Helmets
by Nicola Petrone, Giovanni Carraro, Stefano Dal Castello, Luca Broggio, Andrey Koptyug and Mikael Bäckström
Proceedings 2018, 2(6), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060269 - 13 Feb 2018
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3891
Abstract
A novel Human Head Surrogate was obtained from available MRI scans of a 50th percentile male human head. Addictive manufacturing was used to produce the skull, the brain and the skin. All original MRI geometries were partially smoothed and adjusted to provide the [...] Read more.
A novel Human Head Surrogate was obtained from available MRI scans of a 50th percentile male human head. Addictive manufacturing was used to produce the skull, the brain and the skin. All original MRI geometries were partially smoothed and adjusted to provide the best biofidelity compatible with printing and molding technology. The skull was 3D-printed in ABS and ten pressure sensors were placed into it. The brain surrogate was cast from silicon rubber in the 3D-printed plastic molds. Nine tri-axial accelerometers (placed at the tops of the lobes, at the sides of the lobes, in the cerebellum and in the center of mass) and a three-axis gyroscope (at the center of mass) were inserted into the silicon brain during casting. The cranium, after assembly with brain, was filled with silicon oil mimicking the cerebral fluid. Silicon rubber was cast in additional 3D-printed molds to form the skin surrounding the cranium. The skull base was adapted to be compatible with the Hybrid-III neck and allow the exit of brain sensors cabling. Preliminary experiments were carried out proving the functionality of the surrogate. Results showed how multiple accelerometers and pressure sensors allowed a better comprehension of the head complex motion during impacts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop