Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = bare weathered granite slope

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 7675 KiB  
Article
Study on Soil Stabilization and Slope Protection Effects of Different Plants on Fully Weathered Granite Backfill Slopes
by Yongyan Liao, Hua Li, Kai Gao, Songyan Ni, Yanqing Li, Gang Chen and Zhigang Kong
Water 2024, 16(17), 2548; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16172548 - 9 Sep 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1377
Abstract
The slope erosion in the distribution area of completely weathered granite is often relatively severe, causing serious ecological damage and property loss. Ecological restoration is the most effective means of soil erosion control. Taking completely weathered granite backfill soil as the research object, [...] Read more.
The slope erosion in the distribution area of completely weathered granite is often relatively severe, causing serious ecological damage and property loss. Ecological restoration is the most effective means of soil erosion control. Taking completely weathered granite backfill soil as the research object, two types of slope protection plants, Vetiver grass and Pennisetum hydridum, were selected. We analyzed these two herbaceous plants’ soil reinforcement and slope protection effects through artificial planting experiments, indoor simulated rainfall experiments, and direct shear tests. The test results showed that the runoff and sediment production rates of the two herbaceous plant slopes were significantly lower than those of the bare slope, with the order of bare slope > Vetiver grass slope > Pennisetum hydridum slope. Compared with the bare slope, the cumulative sediment production of the Vetiver grass slope at 60 min decreased by 56.73–60.09%, and the Pennisetum hydridum slope decreased by 75.97–78.45%. The indoor direct shear test results showed that soil cohesion decreases with increasing water content. As the root content of Vetiver grass roots increases, soil cohesion first increases and then decreases, reaching a maximum value when the root content is 1.44%. As the root content of Pennisetum hydridum increases, soil cohesion increases. The internal friction angle increases slightly with increasing water content, while the root content does not significantly affect the internal friction angle. Therefore, the shear strength of soil decreases when the water content increases. The shear strength of the Vetiver grass root-soil composite reaches a peak at a root content of 1.44%, while the shear strength of the giant king grass root-soil composite increases as the root content increases. At the same root content, the shear strength of the Vetiver grass root-soil composite is slightly higher than that of giant king grass. The reinforcement effect of roots on shallow soil is better than on deep soil. Both herbaceous plants have an excellent soil-fixing and slope-protecting impact on the fully weathered granite backfill slope. Pennisetum hydridum’s soil and water conservation effect is significantly better than that of the Vetiver grass. In contrast, Vetiver grass roots slightly outperform Pennisetum hydridum in enhancing the shear strength of the soil. The research results can provide a theoretical basis for the vegetation slope protection treatment of fully weathered granite backfill slopes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rainfall and Water Flow-Induced Soil Erosion-Volume 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 8198 KiB  
Article
Phosphorus Loss through Overland Flow and Interflow from Bare Weathered Granite Slopes in Southeast China
by Longzhou Deng, Kai Fei, Tianyu Sun, Liping Zhang, Xiaojuan Fan and Liang Ni
Sustainability 2019, 11(17), 4644; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174644 - 26 Aug 2019
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 2856
Abstract
Phosphorus (P) is the key limiting factor for eutrophication, and the mechanism of P loss from hillslopes is complex. Few attempts have been made to study the processes of P loss through overland flow and interflow from bare weathered granite slopes in Southeast [...] Read more.
Phosphorus (P) is the key limiting factor for eutrophication, and the mechanism of P loss from hillslopes is complex. Few attempts have been made to study the processes of P loss through overland flow and interflow from bare weathered granite slopes in Southeast China. Therefore, artificial rainfall simulations were performed to evaluate P loss from bare weathered granite slopes with different slope angles (5°, 8°, 15°, 25°) and different rainfall intensities (1.5, 2.0, 2.5 mm/min). The results show that overland flow increased with rainfall intensity, while it declined with slope angle. Interflow exhibited a single-peak curve with time of runoff. The interflow accounted for 28.53–89.12% of the total runoff yield, and the percentage declined with rainfall intensity and increased with slope angle. Both total phosphorus (TP) concentration (CTP) and TP load (LTP) in overland flow increased with rainfall intensity, and the percentages of LTP in each rainfall event ranged from 51% to 92%. CTP in overland flow distinctly fluctuated, with the maximum appearing on the 25° slope, while the maximum in interflow was observed on the 5° slope. LTP in overland flow was the highest on the 8° slope, and was significantly affected by runoff yield and rainfall intensity (p < 0.01). LTP in interflow was small and was significantly affected by rainfall intensity (p < 0.01). Runoff P was mainly lost through overland flow, dominantly in the form of particulate phosphorus (PP), and P loss through interflow was an important supplementation, mainly in the form of dissolved phosphorus (DP). These results provide underlying insights and scientific background for the control of P loss in bare weathered granite areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop