Search Results (2)

This study examines how reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) dosage, virgin-binder grade, and virgin-binder content govern the cracking response of Marshall-designed mixtures. The experimental matrix comprised four RAP levels (30%, 40%, 50%, and 60%), two modified virgin binders (PG 76-22 and PG 88-34) evaluated at their respective optimum asphalt contents (OACs), and two binder-rich PG 76-22 variants (OAC + 0.3 and OAC + 0.5 percentage points); virgin mixtures served as controls. Cracking behavior was characterized by low-temperature semi-circular bending (SCB), the Illinois Flexibility Index Test (I-FIT), and direct-tension cyclic fatigue (DTCF). Fracture and fatigue indicators were subsequently integrated into cracking balance design diagrams, and k-means clustering was used to derive provisional, dataset-specific performance boundaries for long-term oven-aged mixtures. The results show that the higher-performance binder improved long-term cracking resistance at moderate RAP contents. By contrast, mixtures with 50% or 60% RAP and PG 76-22 displayed a distinctly brittle response. Increasing the PG 76-22 content above OAC produced only limited gains. These findings demonstrate that binder quality, rather than a small increase in binder dosage, is the more effective lever for balancing fracture and fatigue resistance in mixtures with substantial RAP contents. Full article

The use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) has been increasing due to its economic benefits and environmental sustainability. Adding RAP materials introduces age-hardened binder, which tends to increase the rutting resistance but decrease cracking resistance. This study aims to evaluate the effects of various RAP contents and binder additives on asphalt performance using the Hamburg wheel tracking test, the Semi-Circular Bending-Illinois Flexibility Index Test (SCB-IFIT) and the Indirect Tensile Asphalt Cracking Test (IDEAL-CT). Asphalt mixtures with RAP contents of 0%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% were prepared using two different binder additives of Zero-M polymer cool mix asphalt additive (PCMA) and Anova vegetable oil-based rejuvenator. Based on the Hamburg test results, the rutting resistance significantly increased by adding 20% RAP but did not increase the rutting resistance any further when RAP increased from 20% to 50%. However, the increase in RAP content exhibited a negative impact on cracking resistance by lowering Flexibility Index (FI) based on the SCB-IF test by 50% or more and CT Index (CTindex) based on IDEAL-CT test by 60% or more. For each RAP content, asphalt mixtures incorporating two different additives were tested: (1) Zero-M additive at a dosage rate of 10% of the total binder with mixing/compaction temperature of 110 °C and (2) Anova additive at a dosage rate of 5% of the RAP binder with mixing/compaction temperature of 135 °C. Compared to the control specimens without additive, asphalt mixtures with Zero-M additive increased FI and CTindex by 50% except CTindex of 30% RAP mix. Zero-M additive increased the rut depth from 3 mm to 10 mm for 20% and 30% RAP mixes but, for 40% and 50% RAP contents, the rutting was less than 5 mm after 20,000 repetitions. Anova rejuvenator did not increase FI and CTindex of 30% and 50% RAP mixes but increased FI and CTindex by 50% for 40% RAP mix. Anova additive did not increase the rutting of the control mix. The SCB-IFIT test results exhibited an average coefficient of variation (COV) of 0.25 whereas the IDEAL-CT test results had a COV of 0.20. The IDEAL-CT test, with its simpler preparation process and more consistent results, is recommended as the preferred test procedure over the SCB-IFIT test. Full article