Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = POMDMEs

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
29 pages, 5517 KB  
Article
A Comparative Study of Diesel– and POMDME–Propane Dual Fuel Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Single Cylinder Engine at Low Load
by Austin Leo Pearson, Kendyl Ryan Partridge, Abhinandhan Narayanan, Kalyan Kumar Srinivasan and Sundar Rajan Krishnan
Energies 2026, 19(5), 1325; https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051325 - 5 Mar 2026
Viewed by 448
Abstract
Dual fuel engines utilize two different fuels consisting of a high reactivity fuel (HRF) injected into the cylinder and a low reactivity fuel (LRF), typically fumigated into the intake manifold. To reduce engine-out emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), early start [...] Read more.
Dual fuel engines utilize two different fuels consisting of a high reactivity fuel (HRF) injected into the cylinder and a low reactivity fuel (LRF), typically fumigated into the intake manifold. To reduce engine-out emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), early start of injection (SOI) of HRF may be employed in dual fuel combustion, albeit at the expense of higher engine-out emissions of unburned hydrocarbons (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO). This study compares performance and emissions of diesel–propane and poly-oxy methylene dimethyl ether (POMDME)-propane dual fuel combustion for a heavy-duty single-cylinder research engine (SCRE) platform based on a production PACCAR MX-11 engine at a low load of 5 bar IMEPg and a constant speed (“B Speed”) of 1339 rpm. While POMDME-natural gas combustion has been explored in previous work, the novelty of the present work lies in the direct comparison of diesel–propane and POMDME–propane combustion for the same SCRE under fixed constraints of NOx < 1 g/kWh, COV of IMEP < 5%, and a maximum pressure rise rate < 10 bar/CAD. By optimizing HRF injection parameters, boost pressure, and propane energy substitution, the present work demonstrates diesel–propane HC and CO emissions improvements of ~86% and ~67%, respectively, while POMDME–propane HC and CO emissions improved by ~91% and ~86% respectively, compared to the corresponding unoptimized baseline values. These improvements were obtained while achieving very low engine-out NOx emissions (diesel–propane ~0.7 g/kWh, POMDME–propane ~0.1 g/kWh) and very good gross indicated fuel conversion efficiencies (diesel–propane ~51%, POMDME–propane ~48%). Additionally, POMDME–propane demonstrated near-zero measurable smoke emissions for all engine operating conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section I2: Energy and Combustion Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1635 KB  
Article
The Role of Ion Exchange Resins for Solving Biorefinery Catalytic Processes Challenges
by Yolanda Patiño, Laura Faba, Raquel Peláez, Jennifer Cueto, Pablo Marín, Eva Díaz and Salvador Ordóñez
Catalysts 2023, 13(6), 999; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13060999 - 13 Jun 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3822
Abstract
Different possible applications of ion exchange resins in the framework of biorefinery catalytic applications are discussed in this article. Three case studies were selected for this approach, connected to three main routes for biomass upgrading: syngas upgrading to high-value chemicals, biomass hydrolysate upgrading, [...] Read more.
Different possible applications of ion exchange resins in the framework of biorefinery catalytic applications are discussed in this article. Three case studies were selected for this approach, connected to three main routes for biomass upgrading: syngas upgrading to high-value chemicals, biomass hydrolysate upgrading, and direct upgrading of oily fraction. The tailored acidic properties of these materials, as well as their stability in the presence of water, have made them promising catalysts for applications such as obtaining biodiesel from activated sludge wastes in batch reactors and obtaining polyoxymethylene methyl ether from syngas (via formaldehyde and methylal, and working in a continuous fixed bed reactor). However, the acidity of these materials may still be too low for acid-catalyzed aldol condensation reactions in the aqueous phase. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Catalytic Behavior of Ion-Exchange Resins)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 4723 KB  
Article
Impact of Oxygenated Additives on Soot Properties during Diesel Combustion
by Natascia Palazzo, Lars Zigan, Franz J. T. Huber and Stefan Will
Energies 2021, 14(1), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010147 - 29 Dec 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4705
Abstract
Emissions from diesel engines can be limited and potentially decreased by modifying the fuel chemical composition through additive insertion. One class of additives that have shown to be particularly efficient in the reduction of the particulates from the combustion of diesel fuels are [...] Read more.
Emissions from diesel engines can be limited and potentially decreased by modifying the fuel chemical composition through additive insertion. One class of additives that have shown to be particularly efficient in the reduction of the particulates from the combustion of diesel fuels are oxygenated compounds. In the present study we investigate the effect of tripropylene glycol methyl ether (TPGME) and two polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (POMDME or OMEs) on soot formation in a laminar diesel diffusion flame. From the evaluation of soot volume fraction by laser-induced incandescence (LII) measurements we could observe that OME additives have a substantial capability (higher compared to TPGME) to decrease the particle concentration, which drops by up to 36% with respect to the pure diesel fuel. We also note a reduction in particle aggregate size, determined by wide-angle light scattering (WALS) measurements, which is more pronounced in the case of OME–diesel blends. The effects we observe can be correlated to the higher amount of oxygen content in the OME molecules. Moreover, both additives investigated seem to have almost no impact on the local soot temperature which could in turn play a key role in the production of soot particles. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop