Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (2,761)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Nurses’ Health Study

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 628 KiB  
Article
Beyond the Bot: A Dual-Phase Framework for Evaluating AI Chatbot Simulations in Nursing Education
by Phillip Olla, Nadine Wodwaski and Taylor Long
Nurs. Rep. 2025, 15(8), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080280 (registering DOI) - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 98
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The integration of AI chatbots in nursing education, particularly in simulation-based learning, is advancing rapidly. However, there is a lack of structured evaluation models, especially to assess AI-generated simulations. This article introduces the AI-Integrated Method for Simulation (AIMS) evaluation framework, a dual-phase [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The integration of AI chatbots in nursing education, particularly in simulation-based learning, is advancing rapidly. However, there is a lack of structured evaluation models, especially to assess AI-generated simulations. This article introduces the AI-Integrated Method for Simulation (AIMS) evaluation framework, a dual-phase evaluation framework adapted from the FAITA model, designed to evaluate both prompt design and chatbot performance in the context of nursing education. Methods: This simulation-based study explored the application of an AI chatbot in an emergency planning course. The AIMS framework was developed and applied, consisting of six prompt-level domains (Phase 1) and eight performance criteria (Phase 2). These domains were selected based on current best practices in instructional design, simulation fidelity, and emerging AI evaluation literature. To assess the chatbots educational utility, the study employed a scoring rubric for each phase and incorporated a structured feedback loop to refine both prompt design and chatbox interaction. To demonstrate the framework’s practical application, the researchers configured an AI tool referred to in this study as “Eval-Bot v1”, built using OpenAI’s GPT-4.0, to apply Phase 1 scoring criteria to a real simulation prompt. Insights from this analysis were then used to anticipate Phase 2 performance and identify areas for improvement. Participants (three individuals)—all experienced healthcare educators and advanced practice nurses with expertise in clinical decision-making and simulation-based teaching—reviewed the prompt and Eval-Bot’s score to triangulate findings. Results: Simulated evaluations revealed clear strengths in the prompt alignment with course objectives and its capacity to foster interactive learning. Participants noted that the AI chatbot supported engagement and maintained appropriate pacing, particularly in scenarios involving emergency planning decision-making. However, challenges emerged in areas related to personalization and inclusivity. While the chatbot responded consistently to general queries, it struggled to adapt tone, complexity and content to reflect diverse learner needs or cultural nuances. To support replication and refinement, a sample scoring rubric and simulation prompt template are provided. When evaluated using the Eval-Bot tool, moderate concerns were flagged regarding safety prompts and inclusive language, particularly in how the chatbot navigated sensitive decision points. These gaps were linked to predicted performance issues in Phase 2 domains such as dialog control, equity, and user reassurance. Based on these findings, revised prompt strategies were developed to improve contextual sensitivity, promote inclusivity, and strengthen ethical guidance within chatbot-led simulations. Conclusions: The AIMS evaluation framework provides a practical and replicable approach for evaluating the use of AI chatbots in simulation-based education. By offering structured criteria for both prompt design and chatbot performance, the model supports instructional designers, simulation specialists, and developers in identifying areas of strength and improvement. The findings underscore the importance of intentional design, safety monitoring, and inclusive language when integrating AI into nursing and health education. As AI tools become more embedded in learning environments, this framework offers a thoughtful starting point for ensuring they are applied ethically, effectively, and with learner diversity in mind. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 310 KiB  
Article
Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections Among Healthcare Workers of Four Large University Hospitals in Northern Italy: Results of an Online Survey Within the ORCHESTRA Project
by Filippo Liviero, Anna Volpin, Patrizia Furlan, Silvia Cocchio, Vincenzo Baldo, Sofia Pavanello, Angelo Moretto, Fabriziomaria Gobba, Alberto Modenese, Marcella Mauro, Francesca Larese Filon, Angela Carta, Maria Grazia Lourdes Monaco, Gianluca Spiteri, Stefano Porru and Maria Luisa Scapellato
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 815; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080815 (registering DOI) - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 76
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This retrospective multicenter study, conducted within the ORCHESTRA Project, investigated SARS-CoV-2 reinfections among 5777 healthcare workers (HCWs) from four University Hospitals (Modena, Verona, Padova and Trieste) in northern Italy, aiming to assess the risk of reinfection and its determinants, comparing the clinical [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This retrospective multicenter study, conducted within the ORCHESTRA Project, investigated SARS-CoV-2 reinfections among 5777 healthcare workers (HCWs) from four University Hospitals (Modena, Verona, Padova and Trieste) in northern Italy, aiming to assess the risk of reinfection and its determinants, comparing the clinical characteristics of reinfections with those of first infections, and examining the impact of preventive measures and vaccination strategies. Methods: HCWs completed an online questionnaire between June and August 2022. The survey collected demographic, occupational, and clinical data, including information on first infections and reinfections. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 28.0, through bivariate and multivariate approaches. Results: Response rates were 41.8% for Modena, 39.5% for Verona, 17.9% for Padova, and 17.4% for Trieste. Among the respondents, 4.8% (n = 276) experienced 2 infections and 0.5% (n = 27) reported 3 infections, out of a total of 330 reinfection cases. Additionally, 43.0% (n = 2787) reported only one infection, while 51.5% were never infected. Reinfection rates increased across five study phases (based on the epidemiological context), likely due to the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. A booster vaccine dose significantly reduced reinfection risk. Higher reinfection risk was found among HCWs aged ≤30 years, those with chronic respiratory diseases, and those working in COVID-19 wards, particularly nurses and allied health professionals. Reinfections were associated with a lower frequency of symptoms both during the period of swab positivity and after a negative swab, as well as with a shorter duration of swab positivity. No significant differences in symptom duration were found between first infections and reinfections. Conclusions: Despite its limitations, the online questionnaire proved a useful tool. Natural infection and vaccination reduced both reinfection risk and symptom severity. Prior infections should be considered in planning vaccination schedules and prioritizing HCWs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccination and Public Health in the 21st Century)
13 pages, 696 KiB  
Article
Vaccine Attitudes, Knowledge, and Confidence Among Nursing, Pediatric Nursing, and Midwifery Undergraduate Students in Italy
by Ersilia Buonomo, Daniele Di Giovanni, Gaia Piunno, Stefania Moramarco, Giuliana D’Elpidio, Ercole Vellone, Enkeleda Gjini, Mariachiara Carestia, Cristiana Ferrari and Luca Coppeta
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 813; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080813 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 111
Abstract
Background: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) represents a growing concern among healthcare professionals and students, potentially undermining public health efforts. Nursing, pediatric nursing, and midwifery students are future vaccinators and educators, making it essential to understand their attitudes, knowledge, and confidence toward vaccination. This study [...] Read more.
Background: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) represents a growing concern among healthcare professionals and students, potentially undermining public health efforts. Nursing, pediatric nursing, and midwifery students are future vaccinators and educators, making it essential to understand their attitudes, knowledge, and confidence toward vaccination. This study aims to assess vaccine-related perceptions and behaviors among these student populations in an Italian university. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between November 2022 and February 2024 at the University of Rome “Tor Vergata.” A structured, anonymous questionnaire, including the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale, vaccine knowledge items, and sources of information, was administered to students in nursing (n = 205), pediatric nursing (n = 46), and midwifery (n = 21). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, ANOVA, post hoc tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests. Results: Among the 272 participants, 20.6% reported refusing at least one recommended vaccine, and 18.4% delayed vaccination for non-medical reasons. Vaccine knowledge and confidence increased significantly with academic progression (p < 0.001). Midwifery students showed both the highest concern for long-term vaccine effects and the greatest confidence in vaccine safety. Institutional and scientific sources were the most trusted, though traditional and non-institutional media also influenced perceptions, particularly among midwifery students. Conclusions: Despite high COVID-19 vaccine uptake, VH persists among health professional students. Discipline-specific patterns highlight the need for early, targeted educational strategies to enhance vaccine literacy and reduce hesitancy. Tailored training may empower future professionals to become informed and credible advocates for vaccination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Acceptance and Hesitancy in Vaccine Uptake: 2nd Edition)
17 pages, 924 KiB  
Article
Prolonged Overtime Predicts Worsening Burnout Among Healthcare Workers: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study in Taiwan
by Yong-Hsin Chen, Gwo-Ping Jong, Ching-Wen Yang and Chiu-Hsiang Lee
Healthcare 2025, 13(15), 1859; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13151859 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 227
Abstract
Background: Overtime adversely affects physical and mental health, contributing to irritability, anxiety, reduced sleep, and even cardiovascular issues, ultimately lowering care quality and increasing turnover intentions. This study aimed to investigate whether prolonged overtime increases the risk of occupational burnout over time among [...] Read more.
Background: Overtime adversely affects physical and mental health, contributing to irritability, anxiety, reduced sleep, and even cardiovascular issues, ultimately lowering care quality and increasing turnover intentions. This study aimed to investigate whether prolonged overtime increases the risk of occupational burnout over time among healthcare workers. Methods: We conducted a four-year longitudinal observational study using secondary data from annual surveys (2021–2024) of healthcare workers at a medical university hospital in Taichung, Taiwan. Burnout was assessed using the personal burnout (PB) scale from the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), with high PB levels (HPBL) defined as scores in the upper quartile of the 2021 baseline. Survival analysis utilizing the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression investigated burnout progression and the effects of overtime. Results: HPBL was defined as PB scores ≥45.83 (upper quartile in 2021). The proportions of HPBL were 30.28% (2021), 33.29% (2022), 36.75% (2023), and 32.51% (2024). Survival analysis confirmed that the risk of burnout increased over time, with the survival time estimated at 2.50 ± 0.03 years and lower survival probabilities observed among participants working overtime (Log-rank test, p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistics revealed overtime work, female gender, being a physician/nurse, and reduced sleep as independent risk factors for HPBL (OR = 3.14 for overtime, p < 0.001). These findings support the hypotheses on burnout progression and the impact of overtime. Conclusions: Overtime significantly heightens the risk of burnout, which worsens over time. Female sex, healthcare roles, obesity, and insufficient sleep are additional risk factors. Limiting overtime and proactive interventions are crucial to preventing burnout in healthcare workers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 288 KiB  
Article
Associations Between Quality of Nursing Work Life, Work Ability Index and Intention to Leave the Workplace and Profession: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Nurses in Croatia
by Snježana Čukljek, Janko Babić, Boris Ilić, Slađana Režić, Biljana Filipović, Jadranka Pavić, Ana Marija Švigir and Martina Smrekar
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(8), 1192; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081192 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 152
Abstract
Introduction: Nurses are the largest group of healthcare workers, and healthcare managers should pay attention to the quality of work life and the health and working capacity of nurses in order to ensure a sufficient number of nurses and a stable workforce. Aim: [...] Read more.
Introduction: Nurses are the largest group of healthcare workers, and healthcare managers should pay attention to the quality of work life and the health and working capacity of nurses in order to ensure a sufficient number of nurses and a stable workforce. Aim: The present study aimed to determine nurses’ quality of work life, work ability index and intention to leave the nursing profession and to examine the associations between nurses’ quality of work life, work ability index and intention to leave the nursing profession. Methods: An online cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 498 nurses completed the instrument, consisting of demographic data, Brooks’ Quality of Nursing Work Life Survey (BQNWL), Work Ability Index Questionnaire (WAIQ) and questions on their intention to leave their current job or the nursing profession. Results: Most nurses had a moderate quality of work life (QWL) (73.7%) and a good work ability index (WAI) (43.78%). Men (p = 0.047), nurses who study (p = 0.021), nurses who do not have children (p = 0.000) and nurses who do not take care of their parents (p = 0.000) have a statistically significantly higher total WAIQ score. Most nurses (61.1%) had considered changing jobs in the last 12 months, and 36.9% had considered leaving the nursing profession. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the total BQNWL and the total WAI. The study found no correlation between QWL, WAI and intention to change jobs or leave the profession, which was unexpected. Conclusions: To ensure the provision of necessary nursing care and a healthy working environment for nurses, it is necessary to regularly monitor QWL and WAI and take measures to ensure the highest quality of working life. Further longitudinal and mixed-methods research is needed to understand the relationship between QWL, WAI and intention to leave. Full article
12 pages, 274 KiB  
Article
Transforming Communication and Non-Technical Skills in Intermediate Care Nurses Through Ultra-Realistic Clinical Simulation: A Cross-Sectional Study
by Mireia Adell-Lleixà, Francesc Riba-Porquet, Laia Grau-Castell, Lidia Sarrió-Colás, Marta Ginovart-Prieto, Elisa Mulet-Aloras and Silvia Reverté-Villarroya
Nurs. Rep. 2025, 15(8), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080272 - 29 Jul 2025
Viewed by 272
Abstract
Background: Intermediate care units face growing complexity due to aging populations and chronic illnesses. Non-technical skills such as empathy and communication are crucial for quality care. We aimed to examine the relationship between communication skills, self-efficacy, and sense of coherence among intermediate [...] Read more.
Background: Intermediate care units face growing complexity due to aging populations and chronic illnesses. Non-technical skills such as empathy and communication are crucial for quality care. We aimed to examine the relationship between communication skills, self-efficacy, and sense of coherence among intermediate care nurses. Methods: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional study with 60 intermediate care nurses from three units in a Catalan hospital, Spain. Participants engaged in high-fidelity simulation using geriatric end-of-life scenarios with an ultra-realistic manikin representing a geriatric patient at the end of life. NTSs were measured using validated tools: the Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale (HP-CSS), the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Sense of Coherence Questionnaire (OLQ-13). Sessions followed INACSL standards, including prebriefing, simulation, and debriefing phases. Results: Post-simulation outcomes revealed significant gains in interpersonal competencies, with men reporting higher assertiveness (p = 0.015) and greater satisfaction with both the simulation experience (p = 0.003) and the instructor (p = 0.008), underscoring gender-related perceptions in immersive training. Conclusions: Ultra-realistic clinical simulation is effective in enhancing NTS among intermediate care nurses, contributing to improved care quality and clearer professional profiles in geriatric nursing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Simulation Based Education in Healthcare)
24 pages, 8924 KiB  
Systematic Review
Effects of Virtual Reality Based on Fall Prevention Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Bom-Mi Park, Heejung Choi and Harim Jeong
Healthcare 2025, 13(15), 1845; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13151845 - 29 Jul 2025
Viewed by 250
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Falls are recognized as a leading cause of injury, with approximately one in ten incidents resulting in physical injury. Although virtual reality (VR)-based interventions have been explored for fall prevention, systematic reviews and meta-analyses remain limited. This study aimed to assess [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Falls are recognized as a leading cause of injury, with approximately one in ten incidents resulting in physical injury. Although virtual reality (VR)-based interventions have been explored for fall prevention, systematic reviews and meta-analyses remain limited. This study aimed to assess research trends and evaluate the effectiveness of VR-based fall prevention through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was carried out in PubMed, EBMASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, and Korean databases from their inception through 31 December 2024. A total of 49 studies met the inclusion criteria, and a meta-analysis was conducted on 37 studies with available data using “R” 4.4.1 software. Effect sizes (ESs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for key outcomes. Results: The VR-based interventions showed a statistically significant positive effect on falls self-efficacy, as measured by the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) (ES = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.17–0.39, p < 0.001). However, no significant reduction was observed in the number of falls (ES = −0.31, 95% CI: −0.80–0.17, p = 0.20). Subgroup analysis by participant medical condition for the FES revealed the largest effects in the Parkinson’s disease (PD) group (ES = 0.61), followed by the multiple sclerosis (MS) (ES = 0.34), the “other” group (ES = 0.25), and “healthy” participants (ES = 0.24). A statistically significant reduction in the number of falls was observed only in the MS group (ES = −0.56). Conclusions: VR-based interventions are effective in improving falls self-efficacy, particularly among individuals with neurological conditions, such as Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis. However, evidence for a reduction in actual fall incidence remains limited. Further large-scale, long-term studies are needed to evaluate the sustained impact of VR interventions on fall prevention outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nursing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 252 KiB  
Article
Perspectives of Healthcare Students on Childhood Vaccines: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study in Bulgaria
by Maria Rohova, Nikolay L. Mihaylov, Antoniya Dimova and Rouzha Pancheva
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 804; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080804 - 29 Jul 2025
Viewed by 216
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Medical and nursing students, as future healthcare professionals, influence public trust and vaccine acceptance. Knowledge gaps or misconceptions regarding immunization may undermine their confidence and effectiveness in addressing vaccine hesitancy. This study explores perceptions and attitudes toward childhood vaccination among Bulgarian healthcare [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Medical and nursing students, as future healthcare professionals, influence public trust and vaccine acceptance. Knowledge gaps or misconceptions regarding immunization may undermine their confidence and effectiveness in addressing vaccine hesitancy. This study explores perceptions and attitudes toward childhood vaccination among Bulgarian healthcare students and factors shaping these outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2024, using an online self-administered questionnaire completed by 374 medical and nursing students. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze vaccine-related responses, comparing attitudes between healthcare programs and education years. Binomial logistic regression was applied to identify predictors of support for mandatory vaccination, first considering demographic and academic variables, and then adding students’ beliefs and common misconceptions. Results: Medical students showed more positive attitudes toward vaccination than nursing students, with 96.8% of medical students versus 89.4% of nursing students believing vaccines are effective (p = 0.005). Students in advanced years demonstrated stronger belief in vaccine effectiveness (p = 0.038). Additionally, misbeliefs about the measles vaccine causing autism decreased significantly, with most students in higher years rejecting this misconception (p = 0.009). Logistic regression revealed that belief in following the vaccine schedule (OR = 22.71; p < 0.001) and confidence in vaccine effectiveness (OR = 10.20; p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of support for mandatory vaccination, with attitudinal factors explaining over half of the variance. Conclusions: Healthcare students’ attitudes about vaccination influence public health outcomes, as their perspectives reflect experience and beliefs. Targeted vaccine education helps address misconceptions and improve vaccination rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Acceptance and Hesitancy in Vaccine Uptake: 2nd Edition)
10 pages, 216 KiB  
Article
Integrating Advance Care Planning into End-of-Life Education: Nursing Students’ Reflections on Advance Health Care Directive and Five Wishes Assignments
by Therese Doan and Sumiyo Brennan
Nurs. Rep. 2025, 15(8), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080270 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 216
Abstract
Background/Objectives: End-of-life care is a vital part of nursing education that has been overlooked until recent years. Advance care planning should be incorporated into the prelicensure nursing curriculum to build student nurses’ confidence in aiding patients and families with their preferred future [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: End-of-life care is a vital part of nursing education that has been overlooked until recent years. Advance care planning should be incorporated into the prelicensure nursing curriculum to build student nurses’ confidence in aiding patients and families with their preferred future care plans. Advance care planning tools, such as the Advance Health Care Directive (AHCD) and Five Wishes, provide experiential learning opportunities that bridge theoretical knowledge with real-world patient advocacy. In this study, students were asked to complete either the AHCD or Five Wishes document as though planning for their own end-of-life care, encouraging personal reflection and professional insight. Embedding these assignments into nursing education strengthens students’ confidence in facilitating end-of-life discussions. This study applied Kolb’s experiential learning theory, including concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation, to explore student nurses’ perspectives on the Advance Health Care Directive and Five Wishes assignments, as well as their understanding of end-of-life care. Methods: This study used an exploratory–descriptive qualitative design featuring one open-ended question to collect students’ views on the assignments. Results: The final sample comprised 67 prelicensure student nurses from Bachelor of Science and Entry-Level Master’s programs. The Advance Health Care Directive and/or Five Wishes assignment enhanced students’ understanding of end-of-life decision-making. Conclusions: It is essential to complete the assignment and immerse oneself in an end-of-life situation to grasp patients’ perspectives and concerns regarding when to engage in difficult conversations with their patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nursing Education and Leadership)
16 pages, 266 KiB  
Article
Experiences, Beliefs, and Values of Patients with Chronic Pain Who Attended a Nurse-Led Program: A Descriptive Phenomenological Qualitative Study
by Jose Manuel Jimenez Martin, Angelines Morales Fernandez, Manuel Vergara Romero and Jose Miguel Morales Asencio
Nurs. Rep. 2025, 15(8), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080269 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 145
Abstract
Aim: To explore the experiences, beliefs, and values of patients who participated in a two-arm randomized clinical trial assessing a nurse-led intervention program for chronic pain self-management, which demonstrated positive effects on pain reduction, depression, and anxiety, and on health-related quality of life [...] Read more.
Aim: To explore the experiences, beliefs, and values of patients who participated in a two-arm randomized clinical trial assessing a nurse-led intervention program for chronic pain self-management, which demonstrated positive effects on pain reduction, depression, and anxiety, and on health-related quality of life 24 months after completion of the program. Design: Descriptive phenomenological qualitative study. Methods: Patients were recruited via telephone, informed about the study, and invited to participate in an individual interview at a place of their choice (hospital or home). All interviews were audiotaped, and an inductive thematic analysis was performed. Results: Seven interviews were carried out between both groups. Six emerging categories were found: effective relationship with the healthcare system, learning to live with pain, family and social support, behaviors regarding pain, resources for self-management, and concomitant determinants. Conclusions: Patients report key aspects that help us to understand the impact of this type of nurse-led group intervention: the intrinsic therapeutic effect of participating in the program itself, the ability to learn to live with pain, the importance of family and social support, the modification of pain-related behaviors, and the identification of resources for self-care. The findings highlight the need for gender-sensitive, individualized care approaches to chronic pain, addressing stigma and social context. Expanding community-based programs and supporting caregivers is essential, as is further research into gender roles, family dynamics, and work-related factors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nursing Care for Patients with Chronic Pain)
33 pages, 1767 KiB  
Review
Nursing Interventions to Reduce Health Risks from Climate Change Impact in Urban Areas: A Scoping Review
by Maria João Salvador Costa, Ulisses Azeiteiro, Robert Ryan, Cândida Ferrito and Pedro Melo
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(8), 1177; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081177 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 305
Abstract
In recent studies, public health has been considered a key stakeholder in climate mitigation and adaptation in cities since they are more exposed to the impact of climate change. Nurses represent a vast majority of public health professionals, playing a key role in [...] Read more.
In recent studies, public health has been considered a key stakeholder in climate mitigation and adaptation in cities since they are more exposed to the impact of climate change. Nurses represent a vast majority of public health professionals, playing a key role in health promotion that allows them to influence individuals, families, and communities in adopting healthier behaviours and decarbonized lifestyles. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to map the existing evidence on nursing interventions, which are being led or implemented to reduce the health risks related to climate change in urban areas. The present review follows the JBI methodological framework, including a search on PubMed, MEDLINE complete, CINAHL Complete, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), and RCAAP. Hand searched references were also considered, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies between January 2014 and October 2024, for a more contemporary perspective. A three-step search strategy and data extraction tool were used by two independent reviewers. Twenty-seven studies in English and Portuguese were eligible for inclusion, all targeting a population of professionals with nursing-related roles: two case studies, one Delphi panel, one descriptive study, one historical research paper, two using a methodological design format, four narrative reviews, one observational study, nine review articles, three scoping reviews, and three systematic reviews. Eight categories of nursing interventions that contribute to decarbonized lifestyles, reducing health risks in relation to climate change, were acknowledged. Nurses play a key role in empowering individuals, families, and communities, promoting climate awareness and literacy, supporting health policy change, advocating for the most vulnerable and engaging in environmental activism, using evidence-based research, and taking advantage of marketing strategies and social media. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 744 KiB  
Article
Interns’ Abuse Across the Healthcare Specialties in Saudi Arabian Hospitals and Its Effects on Their Mental Health
by Farah A. Alghamdi, Bushra M. Alghamdi, Atheer A. Alghamdi, Miad A. Alzahrani, Basmah Ahmed Qasem, Atheel Ali Alshehri, Alwaleed K. Aloufi, Mohammed H. Hakami, Rawaa Ismail Mohammed Ismail, Alaa H. Hakami, Ahmed Elabwabi Abdelwahab and Sultan Mishref Alghmdi
Psychiatry Int. 2025, 6(3), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6030089 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 322
Abstract
Healthcare abuse is a critical human rights and public health issue, particularly impacting medical interns and trainees who are vulnerable to mistreatment during their formative professional years. This cross-sectional study, conducted from February to June 2024, evaluated the prevalence and psychological impact of [...] Read more.
Healthcare abuse is a critical human rights and public health issue, particularly impacting medical interns and trainees who are vulnerable to mistreatment during their formative professional years. This cross-sectional study, conducted from February to June 2024, evaluated the prevalence and psychological impact of harassment and discrimination among 463 healthcare interns in Saudi Arabia from various specialties, including medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and dentistry. Using a self-administered online questionnaire, we found that mistreatment was widely reported, with female interns experiencing significantly higher rates of sexual harassment and gender-based discrimination. Common perpetrators included residents, lecturers, professors, nurses, and patients, with incidents most frequently occurring in surgical and internal medicine departments. Despite high prevalence, only 9% of interns reported the abuse due to mistrust in reporting systems or failure to recognize the behavior as abuse. These experiences were associated with significant psychological distress, including frustration, reduced motivation to learn, and higher DASS scores, particularly among female interns. The study underscores the need for institutional reforms, including policy development, cultural change, and effective reporting systems to ensure a safe and supportive learning environment for future healthcare professionals. Addressing abuse in medical training is essential for individual well-being and the sustainability and integrity of healthcare systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 239 KiB  
Article
Medical Brain Drain in Albania: Migration Attitudes Among Medical and Nursing Students
by Vasilika Prifti, Denada Selfo, Aurela Saliaj, Sonila Qirko, Emirjona Kicaj, Rudina Çerçizaj, Juljana Xhindoli and Liliana Marcela Rogozea
Nurs. Rep. 2025, 15(8), 264; https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080264 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 311
Abstract
Background: The migration of healthcare professionals poses a serious threat to health systems worldwide. This study examines attitudes toward brain drain and the factors influencing migration tendencies among medical and nursing students in Albania, with particular attention to nursing workforce implications. Methods [...] Read more.
Background: The migration of healthcare professionals poses a serious threat to health systems worldwide. This study examines attitudes toward brain drain and the factors influencing migration tendencies among medical and nursing students in Albania, with particular attention to nursing workforce implications. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 610 students in the 2024–2025 academic year using the 16-item Brain Drain Attitude Scale (BDAS). Socio-demographic and academic data were also collected. Results: The mean BDAS score was 53.43 ± 16.88. Pull factors (mean: 40.25 ± 12.76) were stronger motivators than push factors (mean: 13.19 ± 4.13). A total of 487 nursing, 73 midwifery-nursing, and 50 medical students participated (95% response rate). Nearly 40% expressed a desire to work abroad, citing financial prospects (48.2%), better living standards (46%), and personal freedom (42.1%) as reasons. Higher migration tendencies were seen in females (β = 0.50, p = 0.049), medical students (β = 1.01, p = 0.001), and third-year students (β = 0.46, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Migration tendencies are high among future Albanian healthcare professionals, with significant implications for the nursing workforce. Targeted policies are urgently needed to address brain drain through workforce investment and retention strategies. Full article
16 pages, 420 KiB  
Article
Supervision, Moral Distress and Moral Injury Within Palliative Care—A Qualitative Study
by Pia Geuenich, Lena Schlömer, Sonja Owusu-Boakye and Henrikje Stanze
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(7), 1156; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22071156 - 21 Jul 2025
Viewed by 440
Abstract
The number of people requiring palliative care is increasing. This can result in moral and ethical conflicts that may lead to psychological distress and moral injury. (MI). Solutions are needed to counteract career abandonment—supervision (SV) could be one solution. This study examines the [...] Read more.
The number of people requiring palliative care is increasing. This can result in moral and ethical conflicts that may lead to psychological distress and moral injury. (MI). Solutions are needed to counteract career abandonment—supervision (SV) could be one solution. This study examines the extent to which palliative care nurses link MI to their everyday experiences and whether SV can contribute to the identification and prevention of moral distress and MI. In addition, factors that influence the implementation of, participation in, and perception of SV are analyzed. A qualitative study design was chosen for the investigation, consisting of guided interviews, narrative-generating questions with seven participants working in palliative care, and participant observation with audio recording during two supervisions of two palliative care teams with 16 participants in total. The data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. The results show differences in workload between acute and palliative care wards. Time pressure and hierarchical structures promote distress and MI and are particularly evident on acute wards. The interviewees described specific experiences of MI. In addition, factors were identified that influence participation in SV. The analysis of SV showed that workload is a key cause of moral distress and can have an impact on health. SV can be used for sensitization and exchange. Implementation and acceptance of SV depend on individual and structural factors. In palliative care, signs of moral distress are present and are specifically addressed in SV, which means that SV can be a tool for dealing with stressful situations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue End-of-Life Care and Nursing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 258 KiB  
Article
Exploring Staff Perspectives on Implementing an Intervention Package for Post-Stroke Psychological Support: A Qualitative Study
by Kulsum Patel, Emma-Joy Holland, Caroline Leigh Watkins, Audrey Bowen, Jessica Read, Shirley Thomas, Temitayo Roberts and Catherine Elizabeth Lightbody
Psychol. Int. 2025, 7(3), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint7030065 - 21 Jul 2025
Viewed by 163
Abstract
Background: Psychological problems post-stroke can negatively impact stroke survivors. Although general psychological services exist (e.g., NHS Talking Therapies), access remains limited, particularly for individuals with post-stroke communication and cognitive impairments. Stroke service staff report low confidence in managing psychological distress. This study is [...] Read more.
Background: Psychological problems post-stroke can negatively impact stroke survivors. Although general psychological services exist (e.g., NHS Talking Therapies), access remains limited, particularly for individuals with post-stroke communication and cognitive impairments. Stroke service staff report low confidence in managing psychological distress. This study is the first to explore the barriers and facilitators to implementing a novel intervention package comprising a cross-service care pathway and staff training to enhance post-stroke psychological provision. Methods: Staff from stroke and mental health services in four UK regions, recruited through purposive sampling to ensure diversity of services and professional roles, participated in semi-structured interviews or focus groups, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), before and after implementation of the intervention package. Pre-implementation interviews/groups identified anticipated barriers and facilitators to implementation and training needs, informing the development of site-specific intervention packages; post-implementation interviews/groups explored experienced barriers, facilitators and perceptions of the intervention. Interviews underwent thematic analysis using the TDF. Results: Fifty-five staff participated pre-implementation and seventeen post-implementation, representing stroke (e.g., nurse, physiotherapist, consultant) and psychology (e.g., counsellor, psychological therapist) roles across acute, rehabilitation, community, and voluntary services. Challenges anticipated pre-implementation included: limited specialist post-stroke psychological support; low staff confidence; and fragmented service pathways. Post-implementation findings indicated increased staff knowledge and confidence, enhanced screening and referral processes, and stronger inter-service collaboration. Implementation success varied across sites (with some sites showing greater ownership and sustainability of the intervention) and across staff roles (with therapy staff more likely than nursing staff to have received training). Conclusions: Effective implementation of an intervention package to increase psychological provision post-stroke requires staff engagement at all levels across all services. Staff investment influenced ownership of the intervention package, beliefs about priorities and overall enhancement of service capability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neuropsychology, Clinical Psychology, and Mental Health)
Back to TopTop