Search Results (4)

Background/Objectives: Accurate prognostic assessment remains crucial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), especially as treatment options have expanded beyond vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapies to include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI–TKI combinations. The widely used IMDC classification shows important limitations in the modern therapeutic era, highlighting the need for complementary prognostic tools. In this context, the Meet-URO and CANLPH scores—incorporating clinical, inflammatory, and nutritional markers—have emerged as promising alternatives. To evaluate and compare the prognostic performance of the Meet-URO and CANLPH scoring systems in a real-world mRCC cohort predominantly treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy due to limited access to ICI-based combinations. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 112 patients with mRCC. The Meet-URO score was calculated for all patients, while the CANLPH score was assessed in 56 patients with complete laboratory data. CAR, NLR, and PHR were computed using baseline pre-treatment measurements. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), the latter defined exclusively for first-line therapy, were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Correlations between inflammatory markers and survival outcomes were analyzed using Spearman’s rho. Results: Meet-URO demonstrated clear prognostic stratification across all five categories, with the most favorable outcomes in score group 2 and progressively poorer OS and PFS in higher-risk groups. CANLPH also showed meaningful survival discrimination, with the highest inflammatory group (score 3) exhibiting markedly reduced OS and PFS. CAR was the strongest individual predictor of survival, while NLR and PHR showed weaker associations. Conclusions: Both Meet-URO and CANLPH provide strong, complementary prognostic information in mRCC, even in a cohort largely treated with TKI monotherapy. Their integration into routine risk assessment may enhance clinical decision-making, particularly in resource-limited settings. Full article

Background: The Meet-URO score combines the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and bone metastasis status. Although developed in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cohorts, its performance among patients receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy is uncertain. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 301 adults with histologically confirmed metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line TKI monotherapy (sunitinib, pazopanib, or cabozantinib) between 2008 and 2025 across five tertiary centers in Turkey. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Meet-URO was calculated at treatment start and analyzed as prespecified risk strata (0–4, 5–8, 9). Kaplan–Meier estimates, Cox models, and Harrell’s C-index assessed discrimination, with bootstrapped 95% CIs. Results: Median follow-up was 40 months; median OS (mOS) was 25 months (95% CI, 21–29) and median progression-free survival was 10 months (95% CI, 8–12). Meet-URO stratified OS: 41 months for scores 0–4, 21 months for 5–8, and 7 months for 9 (log-rank p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, Meet-URO remained independently prognostic (HR 1.73 for 5–8 vs. 0–4; HR 3.57 for 9 vs. 0–4; both p < 0.001). Discrimination was modest (C-index 0.722) and slightly lower than IMDC (C-index 0.745). NLR ≥ 3.2 was associated with inferior OS (19 vs. 37 months; p < 0.001). Bone metastasis was not significantly associated with OS (p = 0.27). Conclusions: Meet-URO is a valid prognostic tool for mRCC patients treated with first-line TKIs and identifies an ultra-high-risk subgroup (score = 9) with poor survival. While not superior to IMDC, Meet-URO may offer complementary risk information to support clinical monitoring and trial referral, particularly in settings where ICI combinations are restricted. Full article

Background: Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is a heterogeneous group of cancer. Treatment recommendations are extrapolated from ccRCC and lack solid evidence. Here, we review advanced nccRCC patients treated at our institute. Patients and methods: We collected retrospective data on all advanced nccRCC pts treated at the Istituto Oncologico Veneto from January 2008. We compared overall response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to histological subtypes and type of systemic treatments. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression were used to estimate and compare PFS and OS. Results: Of 1370 RCC patients, 289 had a diagnosis of nccRCC and 121 were eligible for the analysis. Fifty-three pts showed papillary histology (pRCC), 15 chromophobe; 37 unclassified RCC (NOS-RCC), 16 other histologies. Pts with chromophobe and other hystologies showed poorer survival rates compared to pRCC and NOS-RCC (mOS 10.7 vs. 20.7 vs. 30.7, p = 0.34). Pts treated with combination regimens achieved a better OS (30.7 vs. 13.7, p = 0.10), PFS (12.7 vs. 6.4, p = 0.10) and ORR (42.4% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.002) than those treated with monotherapy. IMDC and Meet-URO score retained their prognostic value. Conclusion: Our retrospective real-life cohort of advanced nccRCC patients shows that immunotherapy-based combinations could improve ORR, PFS and OS compared to TKI monotherapy. Prospective trials for nccRCC patients utilizing novel therapies are ongoing and their results eagerly awaited. Full article

Introduction: Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) have been increasingly offered to older patients with prostate cancer (PC). However, prognostic factors relevant to their outcome with ARPIs are still little investigated. Methods and Materials: The Meet-URO network ADHERE was a prospective multicentre observational cohort study evaluating and monitoring adherence to ARPIs metastatic castrate-resistant PC (mCRPC) patients aged ≥70. Cox regression univariable and multivariable analyses for radiographic progression-free (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed. Unsupervised median values and literature-based thresholds where available were used as cut-offs for quantitative variables. Results: Overall, 234 patients were enrolled with a median age of 78 years (73–82); 86 were treated with abiraterone (ABI) and 148 with enzalutamide (ENZ). With a median follow-up of 15.4 months (mo.), the median rPFS was 26.0 mo. (95% CI, 22.8–29.3) and OS 48.8 mo. (95% CI, 36.8–60.8). At the MVA, independent prognostic factors for both worse rPFS and OS were Geriatric G8 assessment ≤ 14 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004) and PSA decline ≥50% (p < 0.001 for both); time to castration resistance ≥ 31 mo. and setting of treatment (i.e., post-ABI/ENZ) for rPFS only (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively); age ≥78 years for OS only (p = 0.008). Conclusions: Baseline G8 screening is recommended for mCRPC patients aged ≥70 to optimise ARPIs in vulnerable individuals, including early introduction of palliative care. Full article