Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (6)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Loteae

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
46 pages, 5554 KB  
Article
Taxonomy, Taxa Richness, and Distribution of the Tribes Astragaleae, Crotalarieae, Genisteae, Indigofereae, and Loteae (Fabaceae) in Northeastern Mexico
by Eduardo Estrada Castillón, Gilberto Ocampo, Juan Antonio Encina Domínguez, Arturo Mora-Olivo, Jaime Sánchez Salas, George Sebastian Hinton, Gisela Muro Pérez, Eduardo Alanís Rodríguez, José Isidro Uvalle Sauceda and Renata Aide Valdes Alameda
Taxonomy 2026, 6(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy6020022 - 1 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1783
Abstract
Background: The species richness and endemism of the species of the tribes Astragaleae, Crotalarieae, Genisteae, Indigofereae, and Loteae in northeastern Mexico are poorly documented and the systematics of these groups in the study area have not been updated according to the new [...] Read more.
Background: The species richness and endemism of the species of the tribes Astragaleae, Crotalarieae, Genisteae, Indigofereae, and Loteae in northeastern Mexico are poorly documented and the systematics of these groups in the study area have not been updated according to the new taxonomic modifications proposed by the LPWG. Objective: Our objective is to update the taxonomy and to document the richness and endemism of legumes of the tribes Astragaleae, Crotalarieae, Genisteae, Indigoferae, and Loteae distributed in northeastern Mexico. Methods: This work is based primarily on fieldwork conducted by some of the authors over the past 40 years, and on the review of botanical specimens held in national and international herbaria. Results: Five tribes, eight genera, and 60 species of legumes were recorded and distributed as follows: Astragaleae, one genus (Astragalus), 29 species, and eight infraspecific categories; Crotalarieae, one genus (Crotalaria), 10 species, and three infraspecific categories; Genisteae, two genera (Lupinus and Spartium) and 11 species; Indigofereae, one genus (Indigofera), six species; Loteae, three genera (Acmispon, Coronilla, and Hosackia), and four species. Four introduced species were recorded: Coronilla varia, Crotalaria retusa var. retusa, Indigofera subulata var. scabra, and Spartium junceum, all of them with few records in the wild or cultivated as ornamentals, with no reports of weedy behavior or threats of population expansion. Twenty-nine species and two infraspecific categories are endemic to Mexico, of which 18 are exclusive to the northeastern region. Half and one-third of the recorded species are endemic to Mexico and northeastern Mexico, respectively, demonstrating their uniqueness and importance for conservation purposes. Astragalus and Lupinus constitute up to 95% of the endemic species for the northeastern part of the country. The taxa richness of legumes in NE Mexico is unique, because almost half of them are endemic to the country and a third are endemic to this region, which requires the creation of appropriate measures for the conservation of the specific ecosystems where these species grow. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3581 KB  
Article
Sixteen New Complete Plastid Genomes in the Tribe Loteae (Leguminosae): Structure and Phylogenetic Analysis
by Tahir H. Samigullin, Yury O. Kopylov-Guskov, Olga V. Nikitina, Anastasiya A. Krinitsina, Svetlana V. Polevova and Tatiana E. Kramina
Plants 2025, 14(4), 618; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14040618 - 18 Feb 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1781
Abstract
The tribe Loteae (Papilioniodeae-Leguminosae), according to plastid data, belongs to the Robinioid clade, which also includes the tribes Robinieae and Sesbanieae. The tribe Loteae contains 16 genera and about two hundred seventy-five species, of which the plastid genomes of five species have been [...] Read more.
The tribe Loteae (Papilioniodeae-Leguminosae), according to plastid data, belongs to the Robinioid clade, which also includes the tribes Robinieae and Sesbanieae. The tribe Loteae contains 16 genera and about two hundred seventy-five species, of which the plastid genomes of five species have been studied to date. The main objectives of our study were to obtain new information on the plastid genome structure of the Loteae representatives in order to assess plastid genome variability and reconstruct phylogenetic relationships within the tribe Loteae. We performed sequencing, assembly, structural and phylogenetic analyses of the Loteae plastid genomes. All assembled Loteae plastomes showed a quadripartite structure with an overall length ranging from 150,069 to 152,206 bp and showed relative stability of inverted repeat borders. The Loteae plastomes demonstrated full collinearity; the most variable sites of the studied plastomes were found in petN-trnC and rps16-accD spacers from the LSC region and in the ycf1 gene within the SSC. All inferred relationships attained maximal support with the Hippocrepis lineage separated first, followed by Coronilla and Anthyllis; Lotus is a sister group to the clade Acmispon + Ornithopus. In this study, completely resolved relationships representing a backbone of plastid phylogeny were produced. The obtained results demonstrated that plastid genomes in the tribe Loteae are structurally conservative in contrast to the closely related tribes Robinieae and Sesbanieae. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolutionary Genomics III)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 9297 KB  
Article
Filling the Last Major Gap in the Phylogeny of Lotus (Leguminosae): The Nearly Extinct Lotus benoistii from Morocco, a Potentially Important Breeding Resource
by Galina V. Degtjareva, Tahir H. Samigullin, Carmen M. Valiejo-Roman, Cyrille Chatelain, Dmitry D. Sokoloff and Tatiana E. Kramina
Taxonomy 2025, 5(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy5010006 - 20 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3444
Abstract
Lotus, with about 120 species, is the largest genus of Leguminosae–Loteae. The last global classification recognized 14 sections, of which 13 were then sampled in molecular phylogenetic analyses. The section remaining unsampled is Lotus sect. Benedictella with one critically endangered and possibly [...] Read more.
Lotus, with about 120 species, is the largest genus of Leguminosae–Loteae. The last global classification recognized 14 sections, of which 13 were then sampled in molecular phylogenetic analyses. The section remaining unsampled is Lotus sect. Benedictella with one critically endangered and possibly extinct species, L. benoistii. This is an annual species known from Mediterranean-type vernal pools in the lowlands of northwestern Morocco that differs from other species of the genus in many-seeded indehiscent fruits with thin pericarp and pinnate leaves with 6–9 leaflets. This species was described in a monospecific genus and later transferred to Lotus on the basis of suggested morphological similarities with three mainly desert annuals from North Africa and Southwest Asia currently classified in Lotus sect. Chamaelotus. We provide the first molecular phylogenetic data on L. benoistii and show that it is far from L. sect. Chamaelotus. It is close to plants traditionally classified in Lotus sect. Lotus that have a center of diversity in Europe and temperate Asia. Phylogenetic analyses of plastid markers showed that L. sect. Chamaelotus belongs to a clade with major taxonomic diversity in Macaronesia, Africa, SW Asia, and Australia. Morphology does not provide arguments against the novel hypothesis on the relationships of L. benoistii. Its possible extinction is a great loss for the breeding programs of the pasture plant L. corniculatus. We provide the first anatomical data of L. benoistii, showing that its non-shattering condition has a peculiar nature that differs from all other instances of indehiscence in Loteae. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1102 KB  
Article
Nutritional Characteristics of the Seed Protein in 23 Mediterranean Legumes
by Youssef Elamine, Manuel Alaiz, Julio Girón-Calle, Raquel P. F. Guiné and Javier Vioque
Agronomy 2022, 12(2), 400; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020400 - 5 Feb 2022
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 5115
Abstract
The search for new sources of plant protein for food and animal feed is driven by an increasing demand in developing countries and the interest in healthy alternatives to animal protein. Seeds from 23 different wild legumes belonging to tribes GallegeaeTrifolieae [...] Read more.
The search for new sources of plant protein for food and animal feed is driven by an increasing demand in developing countries and the interest in healthy alternatives to animal protein. Seeds from 23 different wild legumes belonging to tribes GallegeaeTrifolieae, and Loteae were collected in southern Spain and their total amino acid composition was analyzed, by reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), in order to explore their nutritional value. Protein content in the seeds ranged from 15.5% in Tripodium tetraphyllum to 37.9% and 41.3% in Medicago minima and Medicago polymorpha, respectively. Species belonging to tribe Trifolieae, such as Melilotus elegans and Trifolium spp., showed the most equilibrated amino acid composition and the best theoretical nutritional values, although all species were deficient in sulfur amino acids. The amino acid composition of the seeds from some of these legumes was characterized by high levels of the anticancer non-proteic amino acid canavanine This amino acid was found free in the seeds from some of the species belonging to each of the three tribes included in the present work. Astragalus pelecinus in tribe Gallegea, Trifolium angustifolium in tribe Trifolieae, and Anthyllis vulneraria in tribe Loteae have 3.2%, 3.7%, and 7.2% canavanine, respectively. Seeds from Anthyllis vulneraria, Hymenocarpus lotoides, and Hymenocarpos cornicina have the highest contents in canavanine overall. In conclusion, the seeds from some of these legumes could be used for human consumption and for feeding animals because they contain protein of good nutritional quality. These plants could be useful in domestication and breeding programs for production of new varieties with improved nutritional and functional properties. In addition, some of these species may be of interest as a source of the bioactive compound canavanine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Legumes Cultivars and Their Genetic Improvements)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 249 KB  
Article
Mediterranean Subspecies versus Californian Varieties: An Example from Acmispon (Leguminosae, Loteae)
by Dmitry D. Sokoloff, Zoya V. Akulova-Barlow and Rafaël Govaerts
Taxonomy 2021, 1(3), 226-233; https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy1030016 - 3 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4128
Abstract
The tribe Loteae of the family Leguminosae has major centers of diversity in the Mediterranean Region and California. It is used here to illustrate different traditions of taxonomic interpretation of infraspecific variation among researchers in different continents. Recent accounts of European and Mediterranean [...] Read more.
The tribe Loteae of the family Leguminosae has major centers of diversity in the Mediterranean Region and California. It is used here to illustrate different traditions of taxonomic interpretation of infraspecific variation among researchers in different continents. Recent accounts of European and Mediterranean taxa commonly make an emphasis on recognizing subspecies. In contrast, accounts of North American Loteae recognize all infraspecific taxa as varieties. Harmonization of taxonomic concepts across continents is essential for a more accurate representation of data in global biodiversity databases. It is reasonable to use the rank of subspecies for geographically defined infraspecific units with localized zones of intergradation. Such subspecies may be at least partially compatible across continents and taxonomic groups. In the present paper, we discuss taxa traditionally included in or associated with Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet (=Syrmatium glabrum Vogel) and demonstrate a need for recognizing three species, of which one has three geographically defined subspecies. Required nomenclatural combinations are proposed. It is proposed that subspecies rather than varieties should be recognized in a number of other species of North American Loteae (and other plant groups). Inland subspecies of Acmispon glaber and A. maritimus offer an opportunity for comparative analysis in an eco-evo-devo framework. Full article
25 pages, 1567 KB  
Review
Phylogeny and Phylogeography of Rhizobial Symbionts Nodulating Legumes of the Tribe Genisteae
by Tomasz Stępkowski, Joanna Banasiewicz, Camille E. Granada, Mitchell Andrews and Luciane M. P. Passaglia
Genes 2018, 9(3), 163; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9030163 - 14 Mar 2018
Cited by 73 | Viewed by 12732
Abstract
The legume tribe Genisteae comprises 618, predominantly temperate species, showing an amphi-Atlantic distribution that was caused by several long-distance dispersal events. Seven out of the 16 authenticated rhizobial genera can nodulate particular Genisteae species. Bradyrhizobium predominates among rhizobia nodulating Genisteae legumes. Bradyrhizobium strains [...] Read more.
The legume tribe Genisteae comprises 618, predominantly temperate species, showing an amphi-Atlantic distribution that was caused by several long-distance dispersal events. Seven out of the 16 authenticated rhizobial genera can nodulate particular Genisteae species. Bradyrhizobium predominates among rhizobia nodulating Genisteae legumes. Bradyrhizobium strains that infect Genisteae species belong to both the Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Bradyrhizobium elkanii superclades. In symbiotic gene phylogenies, Genisteae bradyrhizobia are scattered among several distinct clades, comprising strains that originate from phylogenetically distant legumes. This indicates that the capacity for nodulation of Genisteae spp. has evolved independently in various symbiotic gene clades, and that it has not been a long-multi-step process. The exception is Bradyrhizobium Clade II, which unlike other clades comprises strains that are specialized in nodulation of Genisteae, but also Loteae spp. Presumably, Clade II represents an example of long-lasting co-evolution of bradyrhizobial symbionts with their legume hosts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Genomics of the Rhizobium-Legume Symbiosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop