Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Jungar Coalfield

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 3535 KiB  
Review
Coal-Hosted Al-Ga-Li-REE Deposits in China: A Review
by Yanbo Zhang, Xiangyang Liu and Wei Zhao
Minerals 2025, 15(1), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15010074 - 14 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1418
Abstract
Investigation of the critical metal elements in coal and coal-bearing strata has become one of the hottest research topics in coal geology and coal industry. Coal-hosted Ga-Al-Li-REE deposits have been discovered in the Jungar and Daqingshan Coalfields of Inner Mongolia, China. Gallium, Al, [...] Read more.
Investigation of the critical metal elements in coal and coal-bearing strata has become one of the hottest research topics in coal geology and coal industry. Coal-hosted Ga-Al-Li-REE deposits have been discovered in the Jungar and Daqingshan Coalfields of Inner Mongolia, China. Gallium, Al, and Li in the Jungar coals have been successfully extracted and utilized. This paper reviews the discovery history of coal-hosted Ga-Al-Li-REE deposits, including contents, modes of occurrence, and enrichment origin of critical metals in each coal mine, including Heidaigou, Harewusu, and Guanbanwusu Mines in the Jungar Coalfield and the Adaohai Coal Mine in the Daqingshan Coalfield, as well as the recently reported Lao Sangou Mine. Gallium and Al in the coals investigated mainly occur in kaolinite, boehmite, diaspore, and gorceixite; REEs are mainly hosted by gorceixite and kaolinite; and Li is mainly hosted by cholorite. Gallium, Al, and REEs are mainly derived from the sediment-source region, i.e., weathered bauxite in the Benxi Formation. In addition, REE enrichment is also attributed to the intra-seam parting leaching by groundwater. Lithium enrichment in the coals is of hydrothermal fluid input. The content of Al2O3 and Ga in coal combustions (e.g., fly ash) is higher than 50% and ~100 µg/g, respectively; concentrations of Li in these coals also reach the cut-off grade for industrial recovery (for example, Li concentration in the Haerwusu coals is ~116 µg/g). Investigations of the content, distribution, and mineralization of critical elements in coal not only provide important references for the potential discovery of similar deposits but also offer significant coal geochemical and coal mineralogical evidence for revealing the geological genesis of coal seams, coal seam correlation, the formation and post-depositional modification of coal basins, regional geological evolution, and geological events. Meanwhile, such investigation also has an important practical significance for the economic circular development of the coal industry, environmental protection during coal utilization, and the security of critical metal resources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4667 KiB  
Article
Cooperative Exploration Model of Coal–Lithium Deposit: A Case Study of the Haerwusu Coal–Lithium Deposit in the Jungar Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, Northern China
by Xin Li, Yingchun Wei, Daiyong Cao, Jinhao Wei, Xiangyang Liu, Yun Zhang and Bo Dong
Minerals 2024, 14(2), 179; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14020179 - 7 Feb 2024
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 1959
Abstract
Lithium (Li) is an important strategic metal mineral resource, irreplaceable in the fields of modern industry, new energy technology, nuclear fusion, and energy storage devices. Li is an important supplement to traditional strategic metal mineral resources and has become an important avenue of [...] Read more.
Lithium (Li) is an important strategic metal mineral resource, irreplaceable in the fields of modern industry, new energy technology, nuclear fusion, and energy storage devices. Li is an important supplement to traditional strategic metal mineral resources and has become an important avenue of mineral resource exploration. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish a cooperative exploration model of coal and Li deposits to lay a theoretical foundation from the perspective of technical optimization and economic rationality. This study is based on the distribution characteristics of the Haerwusu coal–Li deposit, and the effectiveness of the response to exploration techniques, the economical and effective exploration techniques, the reasonable exploration engineering design, and resource estimation parameters is investigated. Therefore, the cooperative exploration model of the coal–Li deposit is established. The high-Li areas in the surface of the Haerwusu Li deposit is distributed near the B1 anticline or in the middle area between the X1 syncline and the B1 anticline, and the vertical distribution of Li content is irregular. The exploration techniques, exploration engineering design, and resource estimation are reviewed and optimized. According to the geological, geochemical, and geophysical conditions, a reasonable cooperative exploration model for coal–Li deposits is established from the two aspects of the coordination of multi-mineral exploration and the coordination of various exploration technologies. The determination of the coal–Li deposit cooperative exploration model has important practical significance for improving the resource security system. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 13906 KiB  
Article
Cooperative Exploration Model of Coal–Gallium Deposit: A Case Study of the Heidaigou Coal–Gallium Deposit in the Jungar Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, China
by Yun Zhang, Yingchun Wei, Daiyong Cao, Xin Li, Jinhao Wei, Laixin Xu, Bo Dong and Tengyue Xu
Minerals 2024, 14(2), 156; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14020156 - 31 Jan 2024
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2137
Abstract
Gallium (Ga) is a typical scattered trace element that is irreplaceable in strategic sectors such as national defense, wireless communications, new materials, renewable energy, and healthcare. The coal–Ga deposit is an important complement to traditional Ga resources and has become a significant focus [...] Read more.
Gallium (Ga) is a typical scattered trace element that is irreplaceable in strategic sectors such as national defense, wireless communications, new materials, renewable energy, and healthcare. The coal–Ga deposit is an important complement to traditional Ga resources and has become a significant focus for Ga mineral resource exploration. Therefore, there is an urgent need to research the coal–Ga cooperative exploration model from both technical and economic perspectives. Taking the Heidaigou coal–Ga deposit as an example, the enrichment zone of coal–Ga is predominantly situated in the northern part of the exploration area, adjacent to the fault zone. The Ga concentration demonstrates a gradual decline from the north–central region towards the northeast and southeast. Similar vertical Ga distribution patterns are observed in adjacent drillings, with notably higher concentrations in the roof, floor, and parting layers. The cooperative exploration model for coal–Ga deposits is proposed based on the above features. The model employs a comprehensive set of cooperative technical methods, such as remote sensing, geological mapping, seismic exploration, drilling, petrogeochemistry, and well logging. The layout of exploration engineering and the concentration of Ga provide the basis for the estimation of Ga resources. Additionally, the model provides an important scientific basis for the improvement of the strategic coordination ability of Ga mineral resources. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 4629 KiB  
Article
Tracking the Vegetation Change Trajectory over Large-Surface Coal Mines in the Jungar Coalfield Using Landsat Time-Series Data
by Yanfang Wang, Shan Zhao, Hengtao Zuo, Xin Hu, Ying Guo, Ding Han and Yuejia Chang
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(24), 5667; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15245667 - 7 Dec 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2414
Abstract
Coal mining and ecological restoration activities significantly affect land surfaces, particularly vegetation. Long-term quantitative analyses of vegetation disturbance and restoration are crucial for effective mining management and ecological environmental supervision. In this study, using the Google Earth Engine and all available Landsat images [...] Read more.
Coal mining and ecological restoration activities significantly affect land surfaces, particularly vegetation. Long-term quantitative analyses of vegetation disturbance and restoration are crucial for effective mining management and ecological environmental supervision. In this study, using the Google Earth Engine and all available Landsat images from 1987 to 2020, we employed the Landsat-based Detection of Trends in Disturbance and Recovery (LandTrendr) algorithm and Support Vector Machine (SVM) to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the year, intensity, duration, and pattern of vegetation disturbance and restoration in the Heidaigou and Haerwusu open-pit coal mines (H-HOCMs) in the Jungar Coalfield of China. Our findings indicate that the overall accuracy for extractions of disturbance and restoration events in the H-HOCMs area is 83% and 84.5%, respectively, with kappa coefficients of 0.82 for both. Mining in Heidaigou has continued since its beginning in the 1990s, advancing toward the south and then eastward directions, and mining in the Haerwusu has advanced from west to east since 2010. The disturbance magnitude of the vegetation greenness in the mining area is relatively low, with a duration of about 4–5 years, and the restoration magnitude and duration vary considerably. The trajectory types show that vegetation restoration (R, 44%) occupies the largest area, followed by disturbance (D, 31%), restoration–disturbance (RD, 16%), disturbance–restoration (DR, 8%), restoration–disturbance–restoration (RDR), and no change (NC). The LandTrendr algorithm effectively detected changes in vegetation disturbance and restoration in H-HOCMs. Vegetation disturbance and restoration occurred in the study area, with a cumulative disturbance-to-restoration ratio of 61.79% since 1988. Significant restoration occurred primarily in the external dumps and continued ecological recovery occurred in the surrounding area. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 13311 KiB  
Article
Rare Earth Element Characteristics in Coal Ash from the Jungar Energy Gangue Power Plant, Inner Mongolia, China
by Shaoqing Huang, Shuzheng Ning, Degao Zhang, Yuan Cai, Xiaoyun Yan, Kang Liu and Xiaotao Xu
Minerals 2023, 13(9), 1212; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13091212 - 15 Sep 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2365
Abstract
The coal and coal-bearing measures in the Jungar Coalfield in Inner Mongolia are characterized by rare earth element (REE) enrichment. Combustion in coal-fired power plants can lead to further enrichment of REEs in coal ash, which serves as a new potential source for [...] Read more.
The coal and coal-bearing measures in the Jungar Coalfield in Inner Mongolia are characterized by rare earth element (REE) enrichment. Combustion in coal-fired power plants can lead to further enrichment of REEs in coal ash, which serves as a new potential source for REE extraction and smelting. Further, investigating the content, modes of occurrence, and transformation behavior of REEs during coal combustion may help in better understanding REE differentiation during coal combustion and facilitate the development of economically feasible REE recovery technologies. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed coal ash from the Jungar Energy Gangue Power Plant in Inner Mongolia via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy combined with energy-dispersive spectroscopy. Our results showed that the REE content of the feed coal was 220 μg/g, slightly higher than the average for global coal. Additionally, fly ash had a higher REE content (898 μg/g) than bottom ash, and its rare earth oxide content was approximately 1152 μg/g, which meets the industrial requirements. Bottom and fly ashes contained similar minerals; however, their relative abundances were different. Specifically, mullite, quartz, calcite, and gypsum were slightly more abundant in fly ash than in bottom ash, whereas amorphous solids were slightly more abundant in bottom ash than in fly ash. Furthermore, fly ash, dominated by Si- and Al-rich minerals, was composed of irregular particles of different shapes and sizes. It also contained monazite and REE fluoro-oxides, which possibly originated from the feed coal and had mineral structures that remained unchanged during coal combustion. Thus, the REE fluoro-oxides possibly resulted from the conversion of bastnaesite in the feed coal during combustion and thereafter became attached to the edge of the Si–Al minerals in the fly ash. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Metal Minerals in Coal)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 4192 KiB  
Article
New Insight into the Depositional Age of No. 6 Coal in Heidaigou Mine, Late Paleozoic Jungar Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, China
by Chao Liu, Xiangdong Chang, Beilei Sun and Fangui Zeng
Sustainability 2022, 14(10), 6297; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106297 - 21 May 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2157
Abstract
Coal deposits can provide novel stratigraphic markers for reconstructing the evolution history of a sedimentary basin and correlating sedimentary successions. Age dating was conducted on zircons harvested from the No. 6 coal seam within the Heidaigou Mine, Inner Mongolia. Two-kilogram samples were taken, [...] Read more.
Coal deposits can provide novel stratigraphic markers for reconstructing the evolution history of a sedimentary basin and correlating sedimentary successions. Age dating was conducted on zircons harvested from the No. 6 coal seam within the Heidaigou Mine, Inner Mongolia. Two-kilogram samples were taken, and the recovered zircons were analyzed for U–Pb isotopic and rare earth elements (REE). The REE results of the zircon grains showed that all the zircon grains were enriched in heavy rare earth elements (HREE) but depleted in light rare earth elements (LREE). In addition, zircons from the No. 6 coal seam had strongly positive Ce (Ce/Ce* = 2.4–224.6) and strongly negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.1–0.6). Combined with the clear oscillatory zones in the cathodoluminescence images, all the zircon grains of the No. 6 coal were characteristic of zircons with magmatic origins. The 206Pb/238U ages of 34 zircon grains produced a narrow age population of 303–286 Ma, with a weighted average age of 293.0 ± 1.5 Ma (mean-squared weighted deviation = 1.5). Therefore, we infer that the No. 6 coal in the Heidaigou Mine was deposited during the Early Permian, and the Carboniferous–Permian boundary should be located stratigraphically lower than the No. 6 coal. The zircon U–Pb geochronology is a useful tool to determine the depositional ages of non-marine-influenced coal. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development and Utilization of Coal Measures Resources)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 4410 KiB  
Article
The Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Some Cu- and Pb-Enriched Coals from Jungar Coalfield, Northwestern China
by Dongna Liu, Anchao Zhou, Fangui Zeng, Fenghua Zhao and Yu Zou
Minerals 2018, 8(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/min8010005 - 27 Dec 2017
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5390
Abstract
The petrological, geochemical, and mineralogical composition of the Carboniferous-Permian coal deposit in the Jungar coalfield of inner Mongolia, Northwestern China, were investigated using optical microscopy and field emission scanning electron microscopy in conjunction with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEM-EDX), as well as X-ray [...] Read more.
The petrological, geochemical, and mineralogical composition of the Carboniferous-Permian coal deposit in the Jungar coalfield of inner Mongolia, Northwestern China, were investigated using optical microscopy and field emission scanning electron microscopy in conjunction with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEM-EDX), as well as X-ray powder diffraction, X-ray fluorescence, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The Jungar coal is of high volatile C/B bituminous quality with 0.58% vitrinite reflectance and has a low sulfur content of 0.70% on average. Inertinite (mineral-free basis) generally dominates in coal from the lower part of the Shanxi formation, and vitrinite is the major maceral assemblage in the coal from the Taiyuan formation, which exhibits forms suggesting variation in the sedimentary environment. The Jungar coal is characterized by higher concentrations of copper (Cu) in No. 6 coal, at 55 μg/g, and lead (Pb) in No. 4 coal at 42 μg/g. Relative to the upper continental crust, the rare earth elements (REE) in the coal are characterized by light and medium–heavy REE enrichment. The minerals in the Jungar coal are mainly kaolinite, dickite, pyrite, calcite, siderite, quartz, and, to a lesser extent, gypsum and K-feldspar. The enrichment and occurrence of the trace elements, and of the minerals in the coal, are attributed to the fragmental parent rock during diagenesis and coalification. The main elements with high enrichment factors, Cu and Pb, overall exhibit a notably inorganic sulfide affinity and a weak organic affinity. Primary and epigenetic sedimentary environment and the lithology of the terrigenous parent rock are the key factors that influence the occurrence and formation of Cu and Pb in coal. The depositional environment is more influential in the formation of Cu than Pb in coal. Lead is more easily affected by the terrigenous factors than Cu when they are under a similar depositional environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineral Resources and the Environment)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 12281 KiB  
Article
Geochemical Characteristics of Trace Elements in the No. 6 Coal Seam from the Chuancaogedan Mine, Jungar Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, China
by Lin Xiao, Bin Zhao, Piaopiao Duan, Zhixiang Shi, Jialiang Ma and Mingyue Lin
Minerals 2016, 6(2), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/min6020028 - 30 Mar 2016
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 5554
Abstract
Fourteen samples of No. 6 coal seam were obtained from the Chuancaogedan Mine, Jungar Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, China. The samples were analyzed by optical microscopic observation, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEM-EDS), inductively coupled plasma mass [...] Read more.
Fourteen samples of No. 6 coal seam were obtained from the Chuancaogedan Mine, Jungar Coalfield, Inner Mongolia, China. The samples were analyzed by optical microscopic observation, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEM-EDS), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) methods. The minerals mainly consist of kaolinite, pyrite, quartz, and calcite. The results of XRF and ICP-MS analyses indicate that the No. 6 coals from Chuancaogedan Mine are higher in Al2O3, P2O5, Zn, Sr, Li, Ga, Zr, Gd, Hf, Pb, Th, and U contents, but have a lower SiO2/Al2O3 ratio, compared to common Chinese coals. The contents of Zn, Sr, Li, Ga, Zr, Gd, Hf, Pb, Th, and U are higher than those of world hard coals. The results of cluster analyses show that the most probable carrier of strontium in the coal is gorceixite; Lithium mainly occurs in clay minerals; gallium mainly occurs in inorganic association, including the clay minerals and diaspore; cadmium mainly occurs in sphalerite; and lead in the No. 6 coal may be associated with pyrite. Potentially valuable elements (e.g., Al, Li, and Ga) might be recovered as byproducts from coal ash. Other harmful elements (e.g., P, Pb, and U) may cause environmental impact during coal processing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Minerals in Coal)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop