Search Results (30)

Biographies of Max Wilson and Gunnar Jungner were published in 2017 and 2020. An in-depth appreciation of the Wilson and Jungner principles, and the publication they were presented in, ‘Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease’, published as nr. 34 in the Public Health Paper-series of the World Health Organisation (W.H.O), called PHP-34 hereafter, was not published as yet. Here an analysis is given of PHP-34 and the ten screening principles, focusing on three subjects. First, by careful analysis of PHP-34, the literature published in the peer reviewed scientific literature, and other sources, the historical background and origin of the ten principles is determined. Second, the precise composition of PHP-34 is described, as parts of the monograph were derived from other seminal works published between roughly 1950 and 1965. Third, it is determined what the contributions of both authors of the monograph were. Results together are discussed in relation to the time PHP-34 was conceptualized and the importance of PHP-34 and the ten principles in the current era. Results show that in the 15 years preceding the publication of PHP-34, many principles of screening were published by authors in the United States of America, a selection of which ended up in PHP-34. Secondly, about 33% of the 145 pages of PHP-34 are drawn from other publications and studies on screening. Thirdly, the case can be made that the actual writing of PHP-34 was done (almost) entirely by Wilson. Regardless, Wilson and Jungner to this day should be applauded for their work. It is a testimony to the value of PHP-34 that we are still reflecting upon, discussing and seeking to intelligently apply the screening principles almost 60 years after their original publication. Full article

Part of the vision of the ISNS is ‘to enhance the quality of neonatal screening and medical services through dissemination of information, guidelines and best practices.’ Although newborn screening encompasses testing in the newborn period for critical congenital heart disease, hearing impairment, birth defects, and congenital biochemical disorders (usually on bloodspots), this guideline is specifically about bloodspot screening. The ISNS has provided neonatal screening guidelines for many years and here presents the renewed 2025 General Guidelines for Neonatal Bloodspot Screening. They are intended to provide a framework for screening programs to develop specific policies around all aspects of the newborn screening system, offering the basic set of items for consideration. These guidelines provide trusted anchors to build, expand, or maintain robustly organized neonatal or newborn screening (NBS) programs and a checklist to evaluate and improve the essential elements of those programs. For starting or developing programs, it is a set of elements for which provisions need to be in place and a checklist of items that the screening program should at a minimum have provisions for. The publication of these guidelines is meant as a starting point for interactive discussion, to further improve this document and expand where necessary. Full article

Newborn screening for Phenylketonuria enables early detection and timely treatment with a phenylalanine-restricted diet to prevent severe neurological impairment. Although effective and in use for 60 years, screening, diagnostic, and treatment practices still vary widely across countries and centers. To evaluate the Phenylketonuria newborn screening practices internationally, we designed a survey with questions focusing on the laboratory aspect of the screening system. We analyzed 24 completed surveys from 23 countries. Most participants used the same sampling age range of 48–72 h; they used tandem mass spectrometry and commercial non-derivatized kits to measure phenylalanine (Phe), and had non-negative cut-off values (COV) set mostly at 120 µmol/L of Phe. Participants mostly used genetic analysis of blood and detailed amino acid analysis from blood plasma as their confirmatory methods and set the COV for the initiation of dietary therapy at 360 µmol/L of Phe. There were striking differences in practice as well. While most participants reported a 48–72 h range for age at sampling, that range was overall quite diverse Screening COV varied as well. Additional screening parameters, e.g., the phenylalanine/tyrosine ratio were used by some participants to determine the screening result. Some participants included testing for tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency, or galactosemia in their diagnostic process. Results together showed that there is room to select a best practice from the many practices applied. Such a best practice of PKU-NBS parameters and post-screening parameters could then serve as a generally applicable guideline. Full article

The International Society for Neonatal Screening (ISNS) has supported the standardization of the measurement of key biochemical markers for the neonatal screening of diseases: thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) for congenital hypothyroidism, phenylalanine (PHE) for phenylketonuria, and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) for congenital adrenal hyperplasia. These diseases are commonly a part of neonatal screening panels worldwide. The ISNS provides a series of secondary reference materials to the manufacturers of neonatal screening reagents to assist in the production of calibration materials for kits. This technical note describes the manufacture of the seventh combined dried blood spot reference preparation for neonatal screening (RPNS) for these analytes. Full article

In The Netherlands, newborn screening (NBS) for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) uses dried blood spot (DBS) succinylacetone (SUAC) as a biomarker. However, high false-positive (FP) rates and a false-negative (FN) case show that the Dutch TT1 NBS protocol is suboptimal. In search of optimization options, we evaluated the protocols used by other NBS programs and their performance. We distributed an online survey to NBS program representatives worldwide (N = 41). Questions focused on the organization and performance of the programs and on changes since implementation. Thirty-three representatives completed the survey. TT1 incidence ranged from 1/13,636 to 1/750,000. Most NBS samples are taken between 36 and 72 h after birth. Most used biomarkers were DBS SUAC (78.9%), DBS Tyrosine (Tyr; 5.3%), or DBS Tyr with second tier SUAC (15.8%). The pooled median cut-off for SUAC was 1.50 µmol/L (range 0.3–7.0 µmol/L). The median cut-off from programs using laboratory-developed tests was significantly higher (2.63 µmol/L) than the medians from programs using commercial kits (range 1.0–1.7 µmol/L). The pooled median cut-off for Tyr was 216 µmol/L (range 120–600 µmol/L). Overall positive predictive values were 27.3% for SUAC, 1.2% for Tyr solely, and 90.1% for Tyr + SUAC. One FN result was reported for TT1 NBS using SUAC, while three FN results were reported for TT1 NBS using Tyr. The NBS programs for TT1 vary worldwide in terms of analytical methods, biochemical markers, and cut-off values. There is room for improvement through method standardization, cut-off adaptation, and integration of new biomarkers. Further enhancement is likely to be achieved by the application of post-analytical tools. Full article

Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) began in the early 1960s based on the work of Dr. Robert “Bob” Guthrie in Buffalo, NY, USA. His development of a screening test for phenylketonuria on blood absorbed onto a special filter paper and transported to a remote testing laboratory began it all. Expansion of NBS to large numbers of asymptomatic congenital conditions flourishes in many settings while it has not yet been realized in others. The need for NBS as an efficient and effective public health prevention strategy that contributes to lowered morbidity and mortality wherever it is sustained is well known in the medical field but not necessarily by political policy makers. Acknowledging the value of national NBS reports published in 2007, the authors collaborated to create a worldwide NBS update in 2015. In a continuing attempt to review the progress of NBS globally, and to move towards a more harmonized and equitable screening system, we have updated our 2015 report with information available at the beginning of 2024. Reports on sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean, missing in 2015, have been included. Tables popular in the previous report have been updated with an eye towards harmonized comparisons. To emphasize areas needing attention globally, we have used regional tables containing similar listings of conditions screened, numbers of screening laboratories, and time at which specimen collection is recommended. Discussions are limited to bloodspot screening. Full article

The COVID-19 pandemic affected many essential aspects of public health, including newborn screening programs (NBS). Centers reported missing cases of inherited metabolic disease as a consequence of decreased diagnostic process quality during the pandemic. A number of problems emerged at the start of the pandemic, but from the beginning, solutions began to be proposed and implemented. Contingency plans were arranged, and these are reviewed and described in this article. Staff shortage emerged as an important issue, and as a result, new work schedules had to be implemented. The importance of personal protective equipment and social distancing also helped avoid disruption. Staff became stressed, and this needed to be addressed. The timeframe for collecting bloodspot samples was adapted in some cases, requiring reference ranges to be modified. A shortage of essential supplies and protective equipment was evident, and laboratories described sharing resources in some situations. The courier system had to be adapted to make timely and safe transport possible. Telemedicine became an essential tool to enable communication with patients, parents, and medical staff. Despite these difficulties, with adaptations and modifications, some centers evaluated candidate conditions, continued developments, or began new NBS. The pandemic can be regarded as a stress test of the NBS under real-world conditions, highlighting critical aspects of this multidisciplinary system and the need for establishing local, national, and global strategies to improve its robustness and reliability in times of shortage and overloaded national healthcare systems. Full article

In 1963, Robert Guthrie’s pioneering work developing a bacterial inhibition assay to measure phenylalanine in dried blood spots, provided the means for whole-population screening to detect phenylketonuria in the USA. In the following decades, NBS became firmly established as a part of public health in developed countries. Technological advances allowed for the addition of new disorders into routine programmes and thereby resulted in a paradigm shift. Today, technological advances in immunological methods, tandem mass spectrometry, PCR techniques, DNA sequencing for mutational variant analysis, ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), iso-electric focusing, and digital microfluidics are employed in the NBS laboratory to detect more than 60 disorders. In this review, we will provide the current state of methodological advances that have been introduced into NBS. Particularly, ‘second-tier’ methods have significantly improved both the specificity and sensitivity of testing. We will also present how proteomic and metabolomic techniques can potentially improve screening strategies to reduce the number of false-positive results and improve the prediction of pathogenicity. Additionally, we discuss the application of complex, multiparameter statistical procedures that use large datasets and statistical algorithms to improve the predictive outcomes of tests. Future developments, utilizing genomic techniques, are also likely to play an increasingly important role, possibly combined with artificial intelligence (AI)-driven software. We will consider the balance required to harness the potential of these new advances whilst maintaining the benefits and reducing the risks for harm associated with all screening. Full article

Although individual rare disorders are uncommon, it is estimated that, together, 6000+ known rare diseases affect more than 30 million people in Europe, and present a substantial public health burden. Together with the psychosocial burden on affected families, rare disorders frequently, if untreated, result in a low quality of life, disability and even premature death. Newborn screening (NBS) has the potential to detect a number of rare conditions in asymptomatic children, providing the possibility of early treatment and a significantly improved long-term outcome. Despite these clear benefits, the availability and conduct of NBS programmes varies considerably across Europe and, with the increasing potential of genomic testing, it is likely that these differences may become even more pronounced. To help improve the equity of provision of NBS and ensure that all children can be offered high-quality screening regardless of race, nationality and socio-economic status, a technical meeting, endorsed by the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, was held in October 2021. In this article, we present experiences from individual EU countries, stakeholder initiatives and the meeting’s final conclusions, which can help countries attempting to establish new NBS programmes or expand existing provision. Full article