Search Results (3)

In addition to the use of reference instruments, low-cost sensors (LCSs) are becoming increasingly popular for air quality monitoring both indoors and outdoors. These sensors provide real-time measurements of pollutants and facilitate better spatial and temporal coverage. However, these simpler devices are typically characterised by lower accuracy and precision and can be more sensitive to the environmental conditions than the reference instruments. It is therefore crucial to characterise the applicability and limitations of these instruments, for which a possible solution is their comparison with reference measurements in real-world conditions. To this end, a measurement campaign has been carried out to evaluate the PM_2.5 readings of several low- and medium-cost air quality instruments of different types and categories (IQAir AirVisual Pro, TSI DustTrak™ II Aerosol Monitor 8532, Xiaomi Mijia Air Detector, and Xiaomi Smartmi PM_2.5 Air Detector). A GRIMM EDM180 instrument was used as the reference. This campaign took place in Budapest, Hungary, from 12 November to 15 December 2020, during typically humid and foggy weather conditions, when the air pollution level was high due to the increased anthropogenic emissions, including wood burning for heating purposes. The results indicate that the individual sensors tracked the dynamics of PM_2.5 concentration changes well (in a linear fashion), but the readings deviated from the reference measurements to varying degrees. Even though the AirVisual sensors performed generally well (0.85 < R² < 0.93), the accuracy of the units showed inconsistency (13–93%) with typical overestimation, and their readings were significantly affected by elevated relative humidity levels and by temperature. Despite the overall overestimation of PM_2.5 by the Xiaomi sensors, they also exhibited strong correlation coefficients with the reference, with R² values of 0.88 and 0.94. TSI sensors exhibited slight underestimations with high explained variance (R² = 0.93–0.94) and good accuracy. The results indicated that despite the inherent bias, the low-cost sensors are capable of capturing the temporal variability of PM_2.5, thus providing relevant information. After simple and multiple linear regression-based correction, the low-cost sensors provided acceptable results. The results indicate that sensor data correction is a necessary prerequisite for the usability of the instruments. The ensemble method is a reasonable alternative for more accurate estimations of PM_2.5. Full article

Fifteen cities across the world have been selected to investigate the public health co-benefits of PM_2.5 reduction, during a period when various non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) were adopted in the COVID-19 pandemic. Through applying a public health model, AirQ+, substantial spatial variations of global public health co-benefits were identified. Differences in seasonal air quality and population baselines were key underlying factors. For cities in North America, NPIs were introduced during the low pollution season, generating no co-benefits. On the other hand, tremendous health co-benefits were observed for cities in India and China, due to the high PM_2.5 background with a large population. Among all, New Delhi has received the largest co-benefits, which saved over 14,700 premature deaths. As the pollution level (i.e., 45 μg m⁻³) with NPIs still exceeded the air quality standard, more rigorous emission controls are urgently needed to protect the public′s health in India. At last, a novel and practical tool for co-benefit screening was developed using data from one of the global measurement networks (i.e., IQAir). Full article

This work builds upon previous efforts at calibrating PM (particulate matter) monitors with ambient-like aerosols produced in the laboratory under well-controlled environmental conditions at the facility known as PALMA (Production of Ambient-like Model Aerosols). In this study, the sampling system of PALMA was equipped with commercial PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ impactors, designed according to the EN 12341:2014 standard, to select different aerosol size fractions for reference gravimetric measurements. Moreover, a metallic frame was mounted around the PM impactor to accommodate up to eight low-cost PM sensors. This sampling unit was placed at the bottom of the 2-meter-long aerosol homogenizer, right above the filter holder for the reference gravimetric measurements. As proof of principle, we used the upgraded PALMA facility to calibrate the new AirVisual Outdoor (IQAir, Goldach, Switzerland) and the SDS011 (InovaFitness, Jinan, China) low-cost PM sensors in a traceable manner against the reference gravimetric method according to the EN 12341 standard. This is the first time that PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ calibrations of low-cost sensors have been successfully carried out with complex ambient-like aerosols consisting of soot, inorganic species, secondary organic matter, and dust particles under controlled temperature and relative humidity. Full article