Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Gauss–Newton–Krylov

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 1645 KB  
Article
Nonlinear Heat Diffusion Problem Solution with Spatio-Temporal Constraints Based on Regularized Gauss–Newton and Preconditioned Krylov Subspaces
by Luis Fernando Alvarez-Velasquez and Eduardo Giraldo
Eng 2025, 6(8), 189; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6080189 - 6 Aug 2025
Viewed by 373
Abstract
In this work, we proposed a dynamic inverse solution with spatio-temporal constraints of the nonlinear heat diffusion problem in 1D and 2D based on a regularized Gauss–Newton and Krylov subspace with a preconditioner. The preconditioner is computed by approximating the Jacobian of the [...] Read more.
In this work, we proposed a dynamic inverse solution with spatio-temporal constraints of the nonlinear heat diffusion problem in 1D and 2D based on a regularized Gauss–Newton and Krylov subspace with a preconditioner. The preconditioner is computed by approximating the Jacobian of the nonlinear system at each Gauss–Newton iteration. The proposed approach is used for estimation of the initial value from measurements of the last value by considering spatial and spatio-temporal constraints. The system is compared to a dynamic Tikhonov inverse solution and generalized minimal residual method (GMRES) with and without a preconditioner. The system is evaluated under noise conditions in order to verify the robustness of the proposed approach. It can be seen that the proposed spatio-temporal regularized Gauss–Newton method with GMRES and a preconditioner shows better estimation results than the other methods for both spatial and spatio-temporal constraints. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 3415 KB  
Article
Partial Differential Equation-Constrained Diffeomorphic Registration from Sum of Squared Differences to Normalized Cross-Correlation, Normalized Gradient Fields, and Mutual Information: A Unifying Framework
by Monica Hernandez, Ubaldo Ramon-Julvez and Daniel Sierra-Tome
Sensors 2022, 22(10), 3735; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103735 - 13 May 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2839
Abstract
This work proposes a unifying framework for extending PDE-constrained Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (PDE-LDDMM) with the sum of squared differences (SSD) to PDE-LDDMM with different image similarity metrics. We focused on the two best-performing variants of PDE-LDDMM with the spatial and band-limited [...] Read more.
This work proposes a unifying framework for extending PDE-constrained Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (PDE-LDDMM) with the sum of squared differences (SSD) to PDE-LDDMM with different image similarity metrics. We focused on the two best-performing variants of PDE-LDDMM with the spatial and band-limited parameterizations of diffeomorphisms. We derived the equations for gradient-descent and Gauss–Newton–Krylov (GNK) optimization with Normalized Cross-Correlation (NCC), its local version (lNCC), Normalized Gradient Fields (NGFs), and Mutual Information (MI). PDE-LDDMM with GNK was successfully implemented for NCC and lNCC, substantially improving the registration results of SSD. For these metrics, GNK optimization outperformed gradient-descent. However, for NGFs, GNK optimization was not able to overpass the performance of gradient-descent. For MI, GNK optimization involved the product of huge dense matrices, requesting an unaffordable memory load. The extensive evaluation reported the band-limited version of PDE-LDDMM based on the deformation state equation with NCC and lNCC image similarities among the best performing PDE-LDDMM methods. In comparison with benchmark deep learning-based methods, our proposal reached or surpassed the accuracy of the best-performing models. In NIREP16, several configurations of PDE-LDDMM outperformed ANTS-lNCC, the best benchmark method. Although NGFs and MI usually underperformed the other metrics in our evaluation, these metrics showed potentially competitive results in a multimodal deformable experiment. We believe that our proposed image similarity extension over PDE-LDDMM will promote the use of physically meaningful diffeomorphisms in a wide variety of clinical applications depending on deformable image registration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sensing and Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1447 KB  
Communication
Steady-State Analysis of Electrical Networks in Pandapower Software: Computational Performances of Newton–Raphson, Newton–Raphson with Iwamoto Multiplier, and Gauss–Seidel Methods
by Jan Vysocký, Ladislav Foltyn, Dejan Brkić, Renáta Praksová and Pavel Praks
Sustainability 2022, 14(4), 2002; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042002 - 10 Feb 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3683
Abstract
At the core of every system for the efficient control of the network steady-state operation is the AC-power-flow problem solver. For local distribution networks to continue to operate effectively, it is necessary to use the most powerful and numerically stable AC-power-flow problem solvers [...] Read more.
At the core of every system for the efficient control of the network steady-state operation is the AC-power-flow problem solver. For local distribution networks to continue to operate effectively, it is necessary to use the most powerful and numerically stable AC-power-flow problem solvers within the software that controls the power flows in these networks. This communication presents the results of analyses of the computational performance and stability of three methods for solving the AC-power-flow problem. Specifically, this communication compares the robustness and speed of execution of the Gauss–Seidel (G–S), Newton–Raphson (N–R), and Newton–Raphson method with Iwamoto multipliers (N–R–I), which were tested in open-source pandapower software using a meshed electrical network model of various topologies. The test results show that the pandapower implementations of the N–R method and the N–R–I method are significantly more robust and faster than the G–S method, regardless of the network topology. In addition, a generalized Python interface between the pandapower and the SciPy package was implemented and tested, and results show that the hybrid Powell, Levenberg–Marquardt, and Krylov methods, a quasilinearization algorithm, and the continuous Newton method can sometimes achieve better results than the classical N–R method. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Management of Power Supply System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop