Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = DJI Matrice 210

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 11966 KiB  
Article
Cost-Effective Drone Survey of Areas with Elevated Background Radiation
by Hédi Katreiner, Béla Kovács, Ákos Horváth, Szabolcs Tóth and Fanni Vörös
Drones 2025, 9(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9010019 - 28 Dec 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2136
Abstract
The use of UAVs to map ionising radiation resulting from radioactive decay is gaining popularity among researchers due to its efficiency and safety. Many studies have been conducted, most of them using expensive sensors. The present research aims to investigate the applicability of [...] Read more.
The use of UAVs to map ionising radiation resulting from radioactive decay is gaining popularity among researchers due to its efficiency and safety. Many studies have been conducted, most of them using expensive sensors. The present research aims to investigate the applicability of an affordable radiation detector in areas where anomalies from natural sources occur. In this research, we use a DJI Matrice 210 V2 RTK quadcopter equipped with a cost-effective Safecast bGeigie Nano Kit radiation sensor to take measurements at different altitudes above ground. We convert these data into GIS-compatible formats and produce accurate isoline maps using the Minimum Curvature interpolation technique. The results show that while the radiation intensity decreases with height, the anomaly was visible but less detailed at all heights investigated. In addition, the study highlights the significant differences in position measurements between RTK GNSS and autonomous GNSS measurements that affect the accuracy of the data. The results will contribute to a more accurate determination of the radiation extent and, thus, to maintaining safety, as well as assisting in emergency surveys and environmental monitoring. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 9189 KiB  
Article
Low Contrast Challenge and Limitations of Thermal Drones in Maritime Search and Rescue—Pilot Study
by Dario Medić, Mario Bakota, Igor Jelaska and Pero Škorput
Drones 2024, 8(3), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8030076 - 23 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2619
Abstract
This paper analyses the efficiency of thermal infrared (TIR) systems during night search operations under specific weather conditions, with a focus on determining the maximum operating altitude of the drone. The drone used in the research (DJI Matrice 210 V2) is equipped with [...] Read more.
This paper analyses the efficiency of thermal infrared (TIR) systems during night search operations under specific weather conditions, with a focus on determining the maximum operating altitude of the drone. The drone used in the research (DJI Matrice 210 V2) is equipped with a thermal camera, in a scenario involving maritime search and rescue (SAR) operation, i.e., person detection at sea with or without a survival suit. By capturing images from different altitudes and measuring key atmospheric and maritime parameters, essential data are obtained for defining optimal DRI parameters (detection, recognition, and identification) within the existing on-site meteorological conditions. This research contributes to more accurate life-saving procedures, underlining the importance of uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) technology for maritime SAR. It is expected that the presented model will improve operational readiness for SAR operations in areas with similar climatic profiles. The research results indicate the need to conduct similar research in different climatic conditions to improve the application of the TIR system in maritime SAR operations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 7594 KiB  
Article
UAV Forensic Analysis and Software Tools Assessment: DJI Phantom 4 and Matrice 210 as Case Studies
by Fahad E. Salamh, Mohammad Meraj Mirza and Umit Karabiyik
Electronics 2021, 10(6), 733; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10060733 - 19 Mar 2021
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 7259
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) also known as drones have created many challenges to the digital forensic field. These challenges are introduced in all processes of the digital forensic investigation (i.e., identification, preservation, examination, documentation, and reporting). From identification of evidence to reporting, there [...] Read more.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) also known as drones have created many challenges to the digital forensic field. These challenges are introduced in all processes of the digital forensic investigation (i.e., identification, preservation, examination, documentation, and reporting). From identification of evidence to reporting, there are several challenges caused by the data type, source of evidence, and multiple components that operate UAVs. In this paper, we comprehensively reviewed the current UAV forensic investigative techniques from several perspectives. Moreover, the contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) discovery of personal identifiable information, (2) test and evaluation of currently available forensic software tools, (3) discussion on data storage mechanism and evidence structure in two DJI UAV models (e.g., Phantom 4 and Matrice 210), and (4) exploration of flight trajectories recovered from UAVs using a three-dimensional (3D) visualization software. The aforementioned contributions aim to aid digital investigators to encounter challenges posed by UAVs. In addition, we apply our testing, evaluation, and analysis on the two selected models including DJI Matrice 210, which have not been presented in previous works. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances on Networks and Cyber Security)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3912 KiB  
Article
Comparing the Spatial Accuracy of Digital Surface Models from Four Unoccupied Aerial Systems: Photogrammetry Versus LiDAR
by Stephanie R. Rogers, Ian Manning and William Livingstone
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(17), 2806; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172806 - 29 Aug 2020
Cited by 58 | Viewed by 8885
Abstract
The technological growth and accessibility of Unoccupied Aerial Systems (UAS) have revolutionized the way geographic data are collected. Digital Surface Models (DSMs) are an integral component of geospatial analyses and are now easily produced at a high resolution from UAS images and photogrammetric [...] Read more.
The technological growth and accessibility of Unoccupied Aerial Systems (UAS) have revolutionized the way geographic data are collected. Digital Surface Models (DSMs) are an integral component of geospatial analyses and are now easily produced at a high resolution from UAS images and photogrammetric software. Systematic testing is required to understand the strengths and weaknesses of DSMs produced from various UAS. Thus, in this study, we used photogrammetry to create DSMs using four UAS (DJI Inspire 1, DJI Phantom 4 Pro, DJI Mavic Pro, and DJI Matrice 210) to test the overall accuracy of DSM outputs across a mixed land cover study area. The accuracy and spatial variability of these DSMs were determined by comparing them to (1) 12 high-precision GPS targets (checkpoints) in the field, and (2) a DSM created from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) (Velodyne VLP-16 Puck Lite) on a fifth UAS, a DJI Matrice 600 Pro. Data were collected on July 20, 2018 over a site with mixed land cover near Middleton, NS, Canada. The study site comprised an area of eight hectares (~20 acres) with land cover types including forest, vines, dirt road, bare soil, long grass, and mowed grass. The LiDAR point cloud was used to create a 0.10 m DSM which had an overall Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) accuracy of ±0.04 m compared to 12 checkpoints spread throughout the study area. UAS were flown three times each and DSMs were created with the use of Ground Control Points (GCPs), also at 0.10 m resolution. The overall RMSE values of UAS DSMs ranged from ±0.03 to ±0.06 m compared to 12 checkpoints. Next, DSMs of Difference (DoDs) compared UAS DSMs to the LiDAR DSM, with results ranging from ±1.97 m to ±2.09 m overall. Upon further investigation over respective land covers, high discrepancies occurred over vegetated terrain and in areas outside the extent of GCPs. This indicated LiDAR’s superiority in mapping complex vegetation surfaces and stressed the importance of a complete GCP network spanning the entirety of the study area. While UAS DSMs and LiDAR DSM were of comparable high quality when evaluated based on checkpoints, further examination of the DoDs exposed critical discrepancies across the study site, namely in vegetated areas. Each of the four test UAS performed consistently well, with P4P as the clear front runner in overall ranking. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue She Maps)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop