Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ‘Munage’ grapes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 2030 KB  
Article
Evaluation of Photosynthetic Performance and Adaptability of Grape Varieties in Arid Regions
by Runze Wang, Haixia Zhong, Fuchun Zhang, Xiaoming Zhou, Meijuan Cheng, Hengde Liu, Shuping Lin, Liping Wang, Xinyu Wu and Liqiang Liu
Horticulturae 2025, 11(9), 1041; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11091041 - 2 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 897
Abstract
Photosynthetic characteristics are critical for grape growth and development. Drought conditions in arid regions significantly affect these characteristics. To identify grape varieties better suited for cultivation in arid environments, this study evaluated the leaf phenotypes and photosynthetic characteristics of 27 table grape varieties [...] Read more.
Photosynthetic characteristics are critical for grape growth and development. Drought conditions in arid regions significantly affect these characteristics. To identify grape varieties better suited for cultivation in arid environments, this study evaluated the leaf phenotypes and photosynthetic characteristics of 27 table grape varieties in Hotan Prefecture, China. Results revealed significant variations in leaf phenotypes and chlorophyll content (SPAD) among varieties under Hotan’s drought conditions. ‘Kyoho’ exhibited the largest leaf area (254.34 cm2), while ‘Munage’ had the smallest (112.43 cm2), and ‘Manaizi’ showed the highest chlorophyll content (SPAD = 44.21). ‘Munage’ and ‘Flame Seedless’ recorded the highest net photosynthetic rates (PNmax = 16.24 and 16.23 μmol·m−2·s−1, respectively), while ‘Thompson Seedless’ had the lowest respiratory loss (RD = 1.15 μmol·m−2·s−1) and light compensation point (Ic = 22.41 μmol·m−2·s−1), with a highly significant positive correlation between RD and Ic. ‘Crimson Seedless’ exhibited the highest light saturation point (Isat = 2745.15 μmol·m−2·s−1). Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis indicated that ‘Autumn Black’ had the highest PSII photochemical yield (Fv/Fm = 0.84), while ‘Zicuiwuhe’ showed high energy transfer indices (PIabs = 1.78, PItotal = 1.66) and electron transfer efficiency (φEo = 0.39). PIabs was significantly correlated with Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo, and energy flux parameters. ‘Molixiang’ demonstrated superior energy utilization, with the highest light absorption (ABS/CSm = 2440.8) and electron transfer flux (ETo/CSm = 874) and the lowest energy dissipation (DIo/CSm = 455.8), supported by a negative correlation between energy dissipation (DIo/CSm) and photochemical efficiency (φEo). Principal component analysis revealed that ‘Molixiang’ had the highest comprehensive photosynthetic adaptability score (0.97), followed by ‘Zicuiwuhe’ (0.79) and ‘Hetianhong’ (0.73), under Hotan’s drought stress conditions. These findings provide valuable insights for selecting and breeding grape varieties adapted to arid environments and climate change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Tree Crop Cultivation and Fruit Quality Assessment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2756 KB  
Article
Post-Harvest Quality Changes and Molecular Responses of Epidermal Wax in ‘Munage’ Grapes with Botrytis cinerea Infection
by Yu Wang, Yunhao Lv, Tong Han, Yidong Liu and Ying Jiang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(8), 3468; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26083468 - 8 Apr 2025
Viewed by 814
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the impact of Botrytis cinerea (B. cinerea) on the post-harvest quality of ‘Munage’ grapes and their molecular mechanism. The results showed that B. cinerea significantly reduced the post-harvest quality of ‘Munage’ grapes, which was manifested by [...] Read more.
This study aimed to investigate the impact of Botrytis cinerea (B. cinerea) on the post-harvest quality of ‘Munage’ grapes and their molecular mechanism. The results showed that B. cinerea significantly reduced the post-harvest quality of ‘Munage’ grapes, which was manifested by an increase in incidence and rot rate, a significant increase in weight loss rate and fruit color difference, and a significant decrease in fruit firmness. In addition, B. cinerea infection significantly changed the reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzyme activities of ‘Munage’ grapes, including increasing the H2O2 content and O2 generation rate as well as changing the superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) activities. B. cinerea also significantly changed the wax structure and content of ‘Munage’ grapes, causing the wax to completely dissolve and disappear and reducing the relative content of wax components. Through RNA-seq analysis, it was found that after B. cinerea infection, 49 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to fatty acid synthesis, extension, cutin and wax synthesis, and wax transport showed up-regulation or down-regulation, and 12 different transcription factors (TFs) also showed significant differential expression. These TFs were correlated with DEGs related to wax synthesis and metabolism, indicating that they may play an important role in the epidermal wax changes in ‘Munage’ grapes caused by B. cinerea. This study revealed the impact of B. cinerea on the post-harvest quality of ‘Munage’ grapes and their molecular mechanism and provided a scientific basis for grape disease prevention and quality maintenance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4109 KB  
Article
Integrative Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analysis Provides Novel Insights into the Effects of SO2 on the Postharvest Quality of ‘Munage’ Table Grapes
by Zhenliang Mou, Yuyao Yuan, Wei Wei, Yating Zhao, Bin Wu and Jianye Chen
Foods 2024, 13(21), 3494; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13213494 - 31 Oct 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2017
Abstract
Postharvest grapes exhibit a limited shelf life due to susceptibility to rot and deterioration, significantly reducing their nutritional and economic value. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a widely recognized preservative for extending grape storage life. This study performed a detailed analysis of [...] Read more.
Postharvest grapes exhibit a limited shelf life due to susceptibility to rot and deterioration, significantly reducing their nutritional and economic value. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a widely recognized preservative for extending grape storage life. This study performed a detailed analysis of ‘Munage’ table grapes treated with SO2 fumigation, employing transcriptomic and metabolomic approaches. Results indicate that SO2 fumigation significantly extends the shelf life of grapes, as demonstrated by improved visual quality, reduced decay rates, and increased fruit firmness. We identified 309 differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) and 1906 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 135 transcription factors (TFs). Both DEGs and DAMs showed significant enrichment of flavonoid-related metabolism compared with the control, and the relative content of four flavonoid metabolites (Wogonin-7-O-glucuronide, Acacetin-7-O-glucuronide, Apigenin-7-O-glucuronide, and Baicalein 7-O-glucuronide) were significantly increased in grapes upon SO2 treatment, suggesting that SO2 treatment had a substantial regulatory effect on grape flavonoid metabolism. Importantly, we constructed complex regulatory networks by screening key enzyme genes (e.g., PAL, 4CLs, CHS, CHI2, and UGT88F3) related to the metabolism of target flavonoid, as well as potential regulatory transcription factors (TFs). Overall, our findings offer new insights into the regulatory mechanisms by which SO2 maintains the postharvest quality of table grapes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3366 KB  
Article
The Effect of Non-Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Torulaspora delbrueckii on the Aroma Composition of Munage Grape Base-Wine and the Mechanism of the Effect
by Xuefeng Yin, Bingze Liu, Ruxianguli Maimaitiyiming, Liang Wang, Lei Zhao, Huimin Zhang, Keping Chen and Aihemaitijiang Aihaiti
Fermentation 2024, 10(5), 266; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10050266 - 20 May 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1996
Abstract
To enhance comprehension of the impact of mixed fermentation using Torulaspora delbrueckii Bio-119667 (TD) on the aroma composition of Munage grape base-wine (MGBW), we analysed the aroma composition of MGBW using HS-SPME-GC-MS widely targeted metabolomics. The levels of volatile aroma components, including terpenes, [...] Read more.
To enhance comprehension of the impact of mixed fermentation using Torulaspora delbrueckii Bio-119667 (TD) on the aroma composition of Munage grape base-wine (MGBW), we analysed the aroma composition of MGBW using HS-SPME-GC-MS widely targeted metabolomics. The levels of volatile aroma components, including terpenes, higher alcohols, aldehydes, heterocyclic compounds, and esters, were significantly higher in MGBW produced by mixed fermentation compared to the pure Saccharomyces yeast control fermentation. The study found that the content of esters increased by 26.3% after mixed fermentation, indicating the contribution of TD to the formation of ester flavour components during the fermentation of MGBW. After analysing aroma activity values, we discovered that 49 out of 115 esters (25.5% of the total) significantly contributed to the aroma profile of MGBW (rOAV > 1). Of these esters, 16 were identified as key aroma compounds (rOAV > 1, VIP > 1) produced by mixed fermentation with the participation of TD. This finding further supports the contribution of TD to the improvement of MGBW’s aroma composition. This study reveals the role of non-Saccharomyces yeast strain Torulaspora delbrueckii Bio-119667 in improving the aroma composition of MGBW produced by mixed culture fermentation and the biosynthetic pathways of key aroma components therein. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Fermentation for Food and Beverages)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop