Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ρdmax prediction

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
32 pages, 17404 KiB  
Article
A Novel Method for Full-Section Assessment of High-Speed Railway Subgrade Compaction Quality Based on ML-Interval Prediction Theory
by Zhixing Deng, Wubin Wang, Linrong Xu, Hao Bai and Hao Tang
Sensors 2024, 24(11), 3661; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113661 - 5 Jun 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1722
Abstract
The high-speed railway subgrade compaction quality is controlled by the compaction degree (K), with the maximum dry density (ρdmax) serving as a crucial indicator for its calculation. The current mechanisms and methods for determining the ρdmax [...] Read more.
The high-speed railway subgrade compaction quality is controlled by the compaction degree (K), with the maximum dry density (ρdmax) serving as a crucial indicator for its calculation. The current mechanisms and methods for determining the ρdmax still suffer from uncertainties, inefficiencies, and lack of intelligence. These deficiencies can lead to insufficient assessments for the high-speed railway subgrade compaction quality, further impacting the operational safety of high-speed railways. In this paper, a novel method for full-section assessment of high-speed railway subgrade compaction quality based on ML-interval prediction theory is proposed. Firstly, based on indoor vibration compaction tests, a method for determining the ρdmax based on the dynamic stiffness Krb turning point is proposed. Secondly, the Pso-OptimalML-Adaboost (POA) model for predicting ρdmax is determined based on three typical machine learning (ML) algorithms, which are back propagation neural network (BPNN), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest (RF). Thirdly, the interval prediction theory is introduced to quantify the uncertainty in ρdmax prediction. Finally, based on the Bootstrap-POA-ANN interval prediction model and spatial interpolation algorithms, the interval distribution of ρdmax across the full-section can be determined, and a model for full-section assessment of compaction quality is developed based on the compaction standard (95%). Moreover, the proposed method is applied to determine the optimal compaction thicknesses (H0), within the station subgrade test section in the southwest region. The results indicate that: (1) The PSO-BPNN-AdaBoost model performs better in the accuracy and error metrics, which is selected as the POA model for predicting ρdmax. (2) The Bootstrap-POA-ANN interval prediction model for ρdmax can construct clear and reliable prediction intervals. (3) The model for full-section assessment of compaction quality can provide the full-section distribution interval for K. Comparing the H0 of 50~60 cm and 60~70 cm, the compaction quality is better with the H0 of 40~50 cm. The research findings can provide effective techniques for assessing the compaction quality of high-speed railway subgrades. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Advanced Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 13040 KiB  
Article
A Framework for Determining the Optimal Vibratory Frequency of Graded Gravel Fillers Using Hammering Modal Approach and ANN
by Xianpu Xiao, Taifeng Li, Feng Lin, Xinzhi Li, Zherui Hao and Jiashen Li
Sensors 2024, 24(2), 689; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24020689 - 22 Jan 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1533
Abstract
To address the uncertainty of optimal vibratory frequency fov of high-speed railway graded gravel (HRGG) and achieve high-precision prediction of the fov, the following research was conducted. Firstly, commencing with vibratory compaction experiments and the hammering modal analysis [...] Read more.
To address the uncertainty of optimal vibratory frequency fov of high-speed railway graded gravel (HRGG) and achieve high-precision prediction of the fov, the following research was conducted. Firstly, commencing with vibratory compaction experiments and the hammering modal analysis method, the resonance frequency f0 of HRGG fillers, varying in compactness K, was initially determined. The correlation between f0 and fov was revealed through vibratory compaction experiments conducted at different vibratory frequencies. This correlation was established based on the compaction physical–mechanical properties of HRGG fillers, encompassing maximum dry density ρdmax, stiffness Krd, and bearing capacity coefficient K20. Secondly, the gray relational analysis algorithm was used to determine the key feature influencing the fov based on the quantified relationship between the filler feature and fov. Finally, the key features influencing the fov were used as input parameters to establish the artificial neural network prediction model (ANN-PM) for fov. The predictive performance of ANN-PM was evaluated from the ablation study, prediction accuracy, and prediction error. The results showed that the ρdmax, Krd, and K20 all obtained optimal states when fov was set as f0 for different gradation HRGG fillers. Furthermore, it was found that the key features influencing the fov were determined to be the maximum particle diameter dmax, gradation parameters b and m, flat and elongated particles in coarse aggregate Qe, and the Los Angeles abrasion of coarse aggregate LAA. Among them, the influence of dmax on the ANN-PM predictive performance was the most significant. On the training and testing sets, the goodness-of-fit R2 of ANN-PM all exceeded 0.95, and the prediction errors were small, which indicated that the accuracy of ANN-PM predictions was relatively high. In addition, it was clear that the ANN-PM exhibited excellent robust performance. The research results provide a novel method for determining the fov of subgrade fillers and provide theoretical guidance for the intelligent construction of high-speed railway subgrades. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 5938 KiB  
Article
Utilizing Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) for Precise Estimation of Soil Compaction Parameters
by Musaab Sabah Abed, Firas Jawad Kadhim, Jwad K. Almusawi, Hamza Imran, Luís Filipe Almeida Bernardo and Sadiq N. Henedy
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(21), 11634; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111634 - 24 Oct 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 2800
Abstract
Traditional laboratory methods for estimating soil compaction parameters, such as the Proctor test, have been recognized as time-consuming and labor-intensive. Given the increasing need for the rapid and accurate estimation of soil compaction parameters for a range of geotechnical applications, the application of [...] Read more.
Traditional laboratory methods for estimating soil compaction parameters, such as the Proctor test, have been recognized as time-consuming and labor-intensive. Given the increasing need for the rapid and accurate estimation of soil compaction parameters for a range of geotechnical applications, the application of machine learning models offers a promising alternative. This study focuses on employing the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) model algorithm, a machine learning method that presents a significant advantage over other models through generating human-understandable piecewise linear equations. The MARS model was trained and tested on a comprehensive dataset to predict essential soil compaction parameters, including optimum water content (wopt) and maximum dry density (ρdmax). The performance of the model was evaluated using coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) values. Remarkably, the MARS models showed excellent predictive ability with high R2 and low RMSE, MAE, and relative error values, indicating its robustness and reliability in predicting soil compaction parameters. Through rigorous five-fold cross-validation, the model’s predictions for wopt returned an RMSE of 1.948%, an R2 of 0.893, and an MAE of 1.498%. For ρdmax, the results showcased an RMSE of 0.064 Mg/m3, an R2 of 0.899, and an MAE of 0.050 Mg/m3. When evaluated on unseen data, the model’s performance for wopt prediction was marked with an MAE of 1.276%, RMSE of 1.577%, and R2 of 0.948. Similarly, for ρdmax, the predictions were characterized by an MAE of 0.047 Mg/m3, RMSE of 0.062 Mg/m3, and R2 of 0.919. The results also indicated that the MARS model outperformed previously developed machine learning models, suggesting its potential to replace conventional testing methods. The successful application of the MARS model could revolutionize the geotechnical field through providing quick and reliable predictions of soil compaction parameters, improving efficiency for construction projects. Lastly, a variable importance analysis was performed on the model to assess how input variables affect its outcomes. It was found that fine content (Cf) and plastic limit (PL) have the greatest impact on compaction parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Application of Machine Learning in Geotechnical Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop