Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Mina Medić

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 4438 KiB  
Article
Luminescence Thermometry with Eu3+-Doped Y2Mo3O12: Comparison of Performance of Intensity Ratio and Machine Learning Temperature Read-Outs
by Tamara Gavrilović, Vesna Đorđević, Jovana Periša, Mina Medić, Zoran Ristić, Aleksandar Ćirić, Željka Antić and Miroslav D. Dramićanin
Materials 2024, 17(21), 5354; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17215354 - 1 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1016
Abstract
Accurate temperature measurement is critical across various scientific and industrial applications, necessitating advancements in thermometry techniques. This study explores luminescence thermometry, specifically utilizing machine learning methodologies to enhance temperature sensitivity and accuracy. We investigate the performance of principal component analysis (PCA) on the [...] Read more.
Accurate temperature measurement is critical across various scientific and industrial applications, necessitating advancements in thermometry techniques. This study explores luminescence thermometry, specifically utilizing machine learning methodologies to enhance temperature sensitivity and accuracy. We investigate the performance of principal component analysis (PCA) on the Eu3+-doped Y2Mo3O12 luminescent probe, contrasting it with the traditional luminescence intensity ratio (LIR) method. By employing PCA to analyze the full emission spectra collected at varying temperatures, we achieve an average accuracy (ΔT) of 0.9 K and a resolution (δT) of 1.0 K, significantly outperforming the LIR method, which yielded an average accuracy of 2.3 K and a resolution of 2.9 K. Our findings demonstrate that while the LIR method offers a maximum sensitivity (Sr) of 5‰ K⁻1 at 472 K, PCA’s systematic approach enhances the reliability of temperature measurements, marking a crucial advancement in luminescence thermometry. This innovative approach not only enriches the dataset analysis but also sets a new standard for temperature measurement precision. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Optical and Photonic Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3594 KiB  
Article
Structure–Dopant Concentration Relations in Europium-Doped Yttrium Molybdate and Peak-Sharpening for Luminescence Temperature Sensing
by Tamara Gavrilović, Aleksandar Ćirić, Mina Medić, Zoran Ristić, Jovana Periša, Željka Antić and Miroslav D. Dramićanin
Materials 2024, 17(17), 4267; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174267 - 28 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1169
Abstract
A set of Eu3+-doped molybdates, Y2−xEuxMo3O12 (x = 0.04; 0.16; 0.2; 0.4; 0.8; 1; 1.6; 2), was synthesized using a solid-state technique and their properties studied as a function of Eu3+ concentration. X-ray diffraction showed [...] Read more.
A set of Eu3+-doped molybdates, Y2−xEuxMo3O12 (x = 0.04; 0.16; 0.2; 0.4; 0.8; 1; 1.6; 2), was synthesized using a solid-state technique and their properties studied as a function of Eu3+ concentration. X-ray diffraction showed that the replacement of Y3+ with larger Eu3+ resulted in a transformation from orthorhombic (low doping concentrations) through tetragonal (high doping concentrations), reaching monoclinic structure for full replacement in Eu2Mo3O12. The intensity of typical Eu3+ red emission slightly increases in the orthorhombic structure then rises significantly with dopant concentration and has the highest value for the tetragonal Y2Mo3O12:80mol% Eu3+. Further, the complete substitution of Y3+ with Eu3+ in the case of monoclinic Eu2Mo3O12 leads to decreased emission intensity. Lifetime follows a similar trend; it is lower in the orthorhombic structure, reaching slightly higher values for the tetragonal structure and showing a strong decrease for monoclinic Eu2Mo3O12. Temperature-sensing properties of the sample with the highest red Eu3+ emission, Y2Mo3O12:80mol% Eu3+, were analyzed by the luminescence intensity ratio method. For the first time, the peak-sharpening algorithm was employed to separate overlapping peaks in luminescence thermometry, in contrast to the peak deconvolution method. The Sr (relative sensitivity) value of 2.8 % K−1 was obtained at room temperature. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2319 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Three Ratiometric Temperature Readings from the Er3+ Upconversion Emission
by Aleksandar Ćirić, Jelena Aleksić, Tanja Barudžija, Željka Antić, Vesna Đorđević, Mina Medić, Jovana Periša, Ivana Zeković, Miodrag Mitrić and Miroslav D. Dramićanin
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(4), 627; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040627 - 28 Mar 2020
Cited by 52 | Viewed by 3886
Abstract
The emission of Er3+ provides three combinations of emission bands suitable for ratiometric luminescence thermometry. Two combinations utilize ratios of visible emissions (2H11/24I15/2 at 523 nm/ 4S3/24I15/2 at 542 [...] Read more.
The emission of Er3+ provides three combinations of emission bands suitable for ratiometric luminescence thermometry. Two combinations utilize ratios of visible emissions (2H11/24I15/2 at 523 nm/ 4S3/24I15/2 at 542 nm and 4F7/24I15/2 at 485 nm/ 4S3/24I15/2 at 545 nm), while emissions from the third combination are located in near-infrared, e.g., in the first biological window (2H11/24I13/2 at 793 nm/ 4S3/24I13/2 at 840 nm). Herein, we aimed to compare thermometric performances of these three different ratiometric readouts on account of their relative sensitivities, resolutions, and repeatability of measurements. For this aim, we prepared Yb3+,Er3+:YF3 nanopowders by oxide fluorination. The structure of the materials was confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis and particle morphology was evaluated from FE-SEM measurements. Upconversion emission spectra were measured over the 293–473 K range upon excitation by 980 nm radiation. The obtained relative sensitivities on temperature for 523/542, 485/542, and 793/840 emission intensity ratios were 1.06 ± 0.02, 2.03 ± 0.23, and 0.98 ± 0.10%K−1 with temperature resolutions of 0.3, 0.7, and 1.8 K, respectively. The study showed that the higher relative temperature sensitivity does not necessarily lead to the more precise temperature measurement and better resolution, since it may be compromised by a larger uncertainty in measurement of low-intensity emission bands. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Luminescent Rare-Earth-Based Nanomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop