Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (6)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Eugenie Dekkers

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 2326 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Neonatal Screening Programs for Tyrosinemia Type 1 Worldwide
by Allysa M. Kuypers, Marelle J. Bouva, J. Gerard Loeber, Anita Boelen, Eugenie Dekkers, Konstantinos Petritis, C. Austin Pickens, The ISNS Representatives, Francjan J. van Spronsen and M. Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2024, 10(4), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10040082 - 16 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1557
Abstract
In The Netherlands, newborn screening (NBS) for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) uses dried blood spot (DBS) succinylacetone (SUAC) as a biomarker. However, high false-positive (FP) rates and a false-negative (FN) case show that the Dutch TT1 NBS protocol is suboptimal. In search of [...] Read more.
In The Netherlands, newborn screening (NBS) for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) uses dried blood spot (DBS) succinylacetone (SUAC) as a biomarker. However, high false-positive (FP) rates and a false-negative (FN) case show that the Dutch TT1 NBS protocol is suboptimal. In search of optimization options, we evaluated the protocols used by other NBS programs and their performance. We distributed an online survey to NBS program representatives worldwide (N = 41). Questions focused on the organization and performance of the programs and on changes since implementation. Thirty-three representatives completed the survey. TT1 incidence ranged from 1/13,636 to 1/750,000. Most NBS samples are taken between 36 and 72 h after birth. Most used biomarkers were DBS SUAC (78.9%), DBS Tyrosine (Tyr; 5.3%), or DBS Tyr with second tier SUAC (15.8%). The pooled median cut-off for SUAC was 1.50 µmol/L (range 0.3–7.0 µmol/L). The median cut-off from programs using laboratory-developed tests was significantly higher (2.63 µmol/L) than the medians from programs using commercial kits (range 1.0–1.7 µmol/L). The pooled median cut-off for Tyr was 216 µmol/L (range 120–600 µmol/L). Overall positive predictive values were 27.3% for SUAC, 1.2% for Tyr solely, and 90.1% for Tyr + SUAC. One FN result was reported for TT1 NBS using SUAC, while three FN results were reported for TT1 NBS using Tyr. The NBS programs for TT1 vary worldwide in terms of analytical methods, biochemical markers, and cut-off values. There is room for improvement through method standardization, cut-off adaptation, and integration of new biomarkers. Further enhancement is likely to be achieved by the application of post-analytical tools. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1148 KiB  
Article
Psychosocial Impact of a True-Positive, False-Positive, or Inconclusive Newborn Bloodspot Screening Result: A Questionnaire Study among Parents
by Lieke M. van den Heuvel, Sylvia M. van der Pal, Rendelien K. Verschoof-Puite, Jasmijn E. Klapwijk, Ellen Elsinghorst, Eugènie Dekkers, Catharina P. B. van der Ploeg and Lidewij Henneman
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2024, 10(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10010018 - 5 Mar 2024
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2533
Abstract
Expansion of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) can increase health gain for more children but also increases the number of false-positive and uncertain results. The impact of abnormal and inconclusive NBS results on parental well-being and healthcare utilization was investigated. A questionnaire was sent [...] Read more.
Expansion of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) can increase health gain for more children but also increases the number of false-positive and uncertain results. The impact of abnormal and inconclusive NBS results on parental well-being and healthcare utilization was investigated. A questionnaire was sent to Dutch parents receiving an abnormal or inconclusive NBS result five weeks (T1) and four months (T2) post-NBS and compared to parents with a normal result (controls). In total, 35 true-positive (TP), 20 false-positive (FP), and 57 inconclusive (IC) participants and 268 controls filled out T1; 19 TP, 14 FP, 27 IC, and 116 controls filled out T2. Participants showed positive attitudes towards NBS. FP participants more often considered NBS less reliable. TP and FP participants experienced more negative emotions regarding the test result compared to controls at both T1 and T2, and IC only at T1. Parent-reported child vulnerability and perceptions of the newborn’s health status and of parenthood showed no differences. TP and FP participants reported more healthcare utilization at T1, and mainly TP at T2. TP and IC participants showed more emergency department visits at T1. The findings can be used to improve NBS programs and optimize support for families with various NBS results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychosocial Impact of Positive Newborn Screening)
Show Figures

Figure 1

2 pages, 171 KiB  
Comment
Comment on Jones et al. Application of a Novel Algorithm for Expanding Newborn Screening for Inherited Metabolic Disorders across Europe. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8, 20
by Rose Maase, Marleen E. Jansen, Marie-Louise Heijnen and Eugenie Dekkers
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2023, 9(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns9010007 - 15 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1640
Abstract
With innovations in both the screening methodologies and treatment of diseases, newborn screening (NBS) programmes are confronted with an increasing number of candidate diseases [...] Full article
11 pages, 264 KiB  
Review
Towards Achieving Equity and Innovation in Newborn Screening across Europe
by Jaka Sikonja, Urh Groselj, Maurizio Scarpa, Giancarlo la Marca, David Cheillan, Stefan Kölker, Rolf H. Zetterström, Viktor Kožich, Yann Le Cam, Gulcin Gumus, Valentina Bottarelli, Mirjam van der Burg, Eugenie Dekkers, Tadej Battelino, Johan Prevot, Peter C. J. I. Schielen and James R. Bonham
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(2), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8020031 - 6 May 2022
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 7823
Abstract
Although individual rare disorders are uncommon, it is estimated that, together, 6000+ known rare diseases affect more than 30 million people in Europe, and present a substantial public health burden. Together with the psychosocial burden on affected families, rare disorders frequently, if untreated, [...] Read more.
Although individual rare disorders are uncommon, it is estimated that, together, 6000+ known rare diseases affect more than 30 million people in Europe, and present a substantial public health burden. Together with the psychosocial burden on affected families, rare disorders frequently, if untreated, result in a low quality of life, disability and even premature death. Newborn screening (NBS) has the potential to detect a number of rare conditions in asymptomatic children, providing the possibility of early treatment and a significantly improved long-term outcome. Despite these clear benefits, the availability and conduct of NBS programmes varies considerably across Europe and, with the increasing potential of genomic testing, it is likely that these differences may become even more pronounced. To help improve the equity of provision of NBS and ensure that all children can be offered high-quality screening regardless of race, nationality and socio-economic status, a technical meeting, endorsed by the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, was held in October 2021. In this article, we present experiences from individual EU countries, stakeholder initiatives and the meeting’s final conclusions, which can help countries attempting to establish new NBS programmes or expand existing provision. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening in Europe: On the Brink of a New Era)
24 pages, 592 KiB  
Article
Neonatal Screening in Europe Revisited: An ISNS Perspective on the Current State and Developments Since 2010
by J. Gerard Loeber, Dimitris Platis, Rolf H. Zetterström, Shlomo Almashanu, François Boemer, James R. Bonham, Patricia Borde, Ian Brincat, David Cheillan, Eugenie Dekkers, Dobry Dimitrov, Ralph Fingerhut, Leifur Franzson, Urh Groselj, David Hougaard, Maria Knapkova, Mirjana Kocova, Vjosa Kotori, Viktor Kozich, Anastasiia Kremezna, Riikka Kurkijärvi, Giancarlo La Marca, Ruth Mikelsaar, Tatjana Milenkovic, Vyacheslav Mitkin, Florentina Moldovanu, Uta Ceglarek, Loretta O'Grady, Mariusz Oltarzewski, Rolf D. Pettersen, Danijela Ramadza, Damilya Salimbayeva, Mira Samardzic, Markhabo Shamsiddinova, Jurgita Songailiené, Ildiko Szatmari, Nazi Tabatadze, Basak Tezel, Alma Toromanovic, Irina Tovmasyan, Natalia Usurelu, Parsla Vevere, Laura Vilarinho, Marios Vogazianos, Raquel Yahyaoui, Maximilian Zeyda and Peter C.J.I. Schielenadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2021, 7(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns7010015 - 5 Mar 2021
Cited by 184 | Viewed by 12738
Abstract
Neonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders (“conditions”) then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990s with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to [...] Read more.
Neonatal screening (NBS) was initiated in Europe during the 1960s with the screening for phenylketonuria. The panel of screened disorders (“conditions”) then gradually expanded, with a boost in the late 1990s with the introduction of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), making it possible to screen for 40–50 conditions using a single blood spot. The most recent additions to screening programmes (screening for cystic fibrosis, severe combined immunodeficiency and spinal muscular atrophy) were assisted by or realised through the introduction of molecular technologies. For this survey, we collected data from 51 European countries. We report the developments between 2010 and 2020 and highlight the achievements reached with the progress made in this period. We also identify areas where further progress can be made, mainly by exchanging knowledge and learning from experiences in neighbouring countries. Between 2010 and 2020, most NBS programmes in geographical Europe matured considerably, both in terms of methodology (modernised) and with regard to the panel of conditions screened (expanded). These developments indicate that more collaboration in Europe through European organisations is gaining momentum. We can only accomplish the timely detection of newborn infants potentially suffering from one of the many rare diseases and take appropriate action by working together. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1210 KiB  
Review
Introducing Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) in the Dutch Neonatal Screening Program
by Maartje Blom, Robbert G.M. Bredius, Gert Weijman, Eugènie H.B.M. Dekkers, Evelien A. Kemper, M. Elske Van den Akker-van Marle, Catharina P.B. Van der Ploeg, Mirjam Van der Burg and Peter C.J.I. Schielen
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2018, 4(4), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns4040040 - 12 Dec 2018
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 7896
Abstract
The implementation of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in the Netherlands is a multifaceted process in which several parties are involved. The Dutch Ministry of Health adopted the advice of the Dutch Health Council to include SCID in the Dutch newborn [...] Read more.
The implementation of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in the Netherlands is a multifaceted process in which several parties are involved. The Dutch Ministry of Health adopted the advice of the Dutch Health Council to include SCID in the Dutch newborn screening program in 2015. As newborn screening for SCID is executed with a new, relatively expensive assay for the Dutch screening laboratory, an implementation pilot study is deemed instrumental for successful implementation. A feasibility study was performed in which the practicalities and preconditions of expanding the newborn screening program were defined. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) indicated that SCID screening in the Netherlands might be cost-effective, recognizing that there are still many uncertainties in the variables underlying the CEA. Data and experience of the pilot study should provide better estimates of these parameters, thus enabling the actualization of CEA results. Prior to the implementation pilot study, a comparison study of two commercially available SCID screening assays was performed. A prospective implementation pilot study or so-called SONNET study (SCID screening research in the Netherlands with TRECs) started in April 2018 and allows the screening for SCID of all newborns in three provinces of the Netherlands for one year. Based on the results of the SONNET study, the Dutch Ministry of Health will make a final decision about national implementation of newborn screening for SCID in the Netherlands. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop