Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Andrew P. Colefax

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1964 KiB  
Article
Utility of Spectral Filtering to Improve the Reliability of Marine Fauna Detections from Drone-Based Monitoring
by Andrew P. Colefax, Andrew J. Walsh, Cormac R. Purcell and Paul Butcher
Sensors 2023, 23(22), 9193; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229193 - 15 Nov 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1714
Abstract
Monitoring marine fauna is essential for mitigating the effects of disturbances in the marine environment, as well as reducing the risk of negative interactions between humans and marine life. Drone-based aerial surveys have become popular for detecting and estimating the abundance of large [...] Read more.
Monitoring marine fauna is essential for mitigating the effects of disturbances in the marine environment, as well as reducing the risk of negative interactions between humans and marine life. Drone-based aerial surveys have become popular for detecting and estimating the abundance of large marine fauna. However, sightability errors, which affect detection reliability, are still apparent. This study tested the utility of spectral filtering for improving the reliability of marine fauna detections from drone-based monitoring. A series of drone-based survey flights were conducted using three identical RGB (red-green-blue channel) cameras with treatments: (i) control (RGB), (ii) spectrally filtered with a narrow ‘green’ bandpass filter (transmission between 525 and 550 nm), and, (iii) spectrally filtered with a polarising filter. Video data from nine flights comprising dolphin groups were analysed using a machine learning approach, whereby ground-truth detections were manually created and compared to AI-generated detections. The results showed that spectral filtering decreased the reliability of detecting submerged fauna compared to standard unfiltered RGB cameras. Although the majority of visible contrast between a submerged marine animal and surrounding seawater (in our study, sites along coastal beaches in eastern Australia) is known to occur between 515–554 nm, isolating the colour input to an RGB sensor does not improve detection reliability due to a decrease in the signal to noise ratio, which affects the reliability of detections. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Airborne Unmanned Sensor System for UAVs)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3204 KiB  
Article
Feasibility of Using Small UAVs to Derive Morphometric Measurements of Australian Snubfin (Orcaella heinsohni) and Humpback (Sousa sahulensis) Dolphins
by Anna I. Christie, Andrew P. Colefax and Daniele Cagnazzi
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010021 - 22 Dec 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4692
Abstract
Analysis of animal morphometrics can provide vital information regarding population dynamics, structure, and body condition of cetaceans. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become the primary tool to collect morphometric measurements on whales, whereas on free ranging small dolphins, have not yet been applied. [...] Read more.
Analysis of animal morphometrics can provide vital information regarding population dynamics, structure, and body condition of cetaceans. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become the primary tool to collect morphometric measurements on whales, whereas on free ranging small dolphins, have not yet been applied. This study assesses the feasibility of obtaining reliable body morphometrics from Australian snubfin (Orcaella heinsohni) and humpback dolphins (Sousa sahulensis) using images collected from UAVs. Specifically, using a dolphin replica of known size, we tested the effect of the altitude of the UAV and the position of the animal within the image frame on the accuracy of length estimates. Using linear mixed models, we further assessed the precision of the total length estimates of humpback and snubfin dolphins. The precision of length estimates on the replica increased by ~2% when images were sampled at 45–60 m compared with 15–30 m. However, the precision of total length estimates on dolphins was significantly influenced only by the degree of arch and edge certainty. Overall, we obtained total length estimates with a precision of ~3% and consistent with published data. This study demonstrates the reliability of using UAV based images to obtain morphometrics of small dolphin species, such as snubfin and humpback dolphins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Applications in Marine Mammal Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2530 KiB  
Review
The Drone Revolution of Shark Science: A Review
by Paul A. Butcher, Andrew P. Colefax, Robert A. Gorkin, Stephen M. Kajiura, Naima A. López, Johann Mourier, Cormac R. Purcell, Gregory B. Skomal, James P. Tucker, Andrew J. Walsh, Jane E. Williamson and Vincent Raoult
Drones 2021, 5(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5010008 - 21 Jan 2021
Cited by 98 | Viewed by 27744
Abstract
Over the past decade, drones have become a popular tool for wildlife management and research. Drones have shown significant value for animals that were often difficult or dangerous to study using traditional survey methods. In the past five years drone technology has become [...] Read more.
Over the past decade, drones have become a popular tool for wildlife management and research. Drones have shown significant value for animals that were often difficult or dangerous to study using traditional survey methods. In the past five years drone technology has become commonplace for shark research with their use above, and more recently, below the water helping to minimise knowledge gaps about these cryptic species. Drones have enhanced our understanding of shark behaviour and are critically important tools, not only due to the importance and conservation of the animals in the ecosystem, but to also help minimise dangerous encounters with humans. To provide some guidance for their future use in relation to sharks, this review provides an overview of how drones are currently used with critical context for shark monitoring. We show how drones have been used to fill knowledge gaps around fundamental shark behaviours or movements, social interactions, and predation across multiple species and scenarios. We further detail the advancement in technology across sensors, automation, and artificial intelligence that are improving our abilities in data collection and analysis and opening opportunities for shark-related beach safety. An investigation of the shark-based research potential for underwater drones (ROV/AUV) is also provided. Finally, this review provides baseline observations that have been pioneered for shark research and recommendations for how drones might be used to enhance our knowledge in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drone Technology for Wildlife and Human Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 1164 KiB  
Review
Operational Protocols for the Use of Drones in Marine Animal Research
by Vincent Raoult, Andrew P Colefax, Blake M. Allan, Daniele Cagnazzi, Nataly Castelblanco-Martínez, Daniel Ierodiaconou, David W. Johnston, Sarah Landeo-Yauri, Mitchell Lyons, Vanessa Pirotta, Gail Schofield and Paul A Butcher
Drones 2020, 4(4), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4040064 - 25 Sep 2020
Cited by 112 | Viewed by 23898
Abstract
The use of drones to study marine animals shows promise for the examination of numerous aspects of their ecology, behaviour, health and movement patterns. However, the responses of some marine phyla to the presence of drones varies broadly, as do the general operational [...] Read more.
The use of drones to study marine animals shows promise for the examination of numerous aspects of their ecology, behaviour, health and movement patterns. However, the responses of some marine phyla to the presence of drones varies broadly, as do the general operational protocols used to study them. Inconsistent methodological approaches could lead to difficulties comparing studies and can call into question the repeatability of research. This review draws on current literature and researchers with a wealth of practical experience to outline the idiosyncrasies of studying various marine taxa with drones. We also outline current best practice for drone operation in marine environments based on the literature and our practical experience in the field. The protocols outlined herein will be of use to researchers interested in incorporating drones as a tool into their research on marine animals and will help form consistent approaches for drone-based studies in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drone Technology for Wildlife and Human Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop