Next Article in Journal
Black Soldier Fly Culture as a Source of Chitin and Chitosan for Its Potential Use in Concrete: An Overview
Previous Article in Journal
Low-Velocity Impact Response of Sandwich Structure with Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Cores
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of Radiopaque, Drug-Loaded Resorbable Polymer for Medical Device Development

by
Sophie T. Melancon
1,
Erin Marie San Valentin
1,
Dominic Karl M. Bolinas
1,2,
Marvin R. Bernardino
1,
Archana Mishra
1,
Gino Canlas
3,
Gouthami Chintalapani
4,
Megan C. Jacobsen
5,
Allan John R. Barcena
1 and
Steven Y. Huang
1,*
1
Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2
College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Philippines
3
Department of Chemistry, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, USA
4
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern, PA 19355, USA
5
Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2025, 17(6), 716; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17060716
Submission received: 8 February 2025 / Revised: 1 March 2025 / Accepted: 6 March 2025 / Published: 7 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Applications)

Abstract

Resorbable medical devices provide temporary functionality before degrading into safe byproducts. One application is absorbable inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs), which prevent pulmonary embolism in high-risk patients with contraindications to anticoagulants. However, current absorbable IVCFs are limited by radiolucency and local clot formation risks. This study aimed to develop radiopaque, drug-loaded resorbable IVCFs with enhanced imaging and therapeutic capabilities. Poly-p-dioxanone (PPDO) sutures were infused with gadolinium nanoparticles (GdNPs) and dipyridamole (DPA), an anti-thrombotic agent. GdNPs were synthesized with an average diameter of 35.76 ± 3.71 nm. Gd content was 371 ± 1.6 mg/g (PPDO-Gd) and 280 ± 0.3 mg/g (PPDO-Gd + DPA), while the DPA content was 18.20 ± 5.38 mg/g (PPDO-DPA) and 12.91 ± 0.83 mg/g (PPDO-Gd + DPA). Suture thickness (0.39–0.49 cm, p = 0.0143) and melting temperature (103.61–105.90, p = 0.0002) statistically differed among the different groups, while load-at-break did not (4.39–5.38, p = 0.2367). Although suture thickness and melting temperatures differed significantly, load-at-break was preserved and did not alter the mechanical and degradation properties of the various IVCFs. Micro-computed tomography revealed enhanced radiopacity for Gd-containing IVCFs (2713 ± 105 HU for PPDO-Gd, 1516 ± 281 HU for PPDO-Gd + DPA). Radiopacity decreased gradually over 10–12 weeks. Clot-trapping efficacy was maintained, and no hemolysis or cellular toxicity was observed. In conclusion, the GdNP- and DPA-infused PPDO IVCFs demonstrated improved radiopacity, anti-thrombotic potential, and compatibility with routine imaging, without compromising mechanical strength or safety.

1. Introduction

Resorbable medical devices represent a significant advancement in biomedicine designed to perform critical functions such as structural support or drug delivery for a temporary period [1,2,3]. Typically, once their therapeutic purpose has been fulfilled, these devices gradually degrade into non-toxic byproducts that can be naturally absorbed or excreted by the body, eliminating the need for surgical removal. This feature not only reduces the risks associated with long-term implantation such as local infection [4] or chronic inflammation [5], but also minimizes the need for follow-up surgeries, enhancing patient recovery and reducing healthcare costs.
As research continues to improve the performance and biocompatibility of resorbable materials, their potential extends to treating life-threatening conditions like pulmonary embolism (PE). PE affects nearly 900,000 people every year in the United States alone [6]. Patients at risk of this condition typically receive anticoagulant therapy (e.g., low molecular weight heparin and direct-acting oral anticoagulants) to prevent the development of blood clots [6,7] and mitigate the risk of subsequent complications including strokes [7] and cardiac arrest [8]. However, for patients with contraindications to anticoagulant therapy, the implantation of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) is often typically recommended as an alternative treatment option [9]. Traditionally, IVCFs are fabricated from metals such as nitinol or stainless steel and are intended for surgical retrieval after 25–54 days post-implantation as recommended by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [10]. Yet, only 17–30% of patients have these temporary filters removed despite the risk of complications such as filter migration and perforation [11]. To address this issue, research has focused on developing resorbable IVCFs, which would eliminate the need for surgical removal.
One of the biggest challenges of making an effective resorbable IVCF is selecting a polymer that has the most optimal degradation time. It is critical that temporary IVCF remain fully functional for a minimum of 35 days following a major trauma or procedure, while also being removed prior to the onset of significant complications. Pre-clinical testing has been performed to test the efficacy of absorbable IVCFs made with polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) [12], polyglycolic acid (PGA) [13], poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), and polycaprolactone (PCL) [14]. All these studies were successfully fabricated into filters with different degradation characteristics and clot-trapping efficacies. On the other hand, Eggers et al. [15] showed that poly-p-dioxanone (PPDO) is a promising polymer for fabricating absorbable IVCFs with a degradation time of 6 weeks. PPDO is commercially available and inexpensive because of its common application as surgical sutures. However, unlike metallic IVCFs, PPDO filters cannot be easily visualized on conventional imaging such as computed tomography (CT) or X-ray. Visualizing the filter is critical for patient safety. It allows the assessment of immediate and delayed filter complications, such as filter tilt, incomplete expansion, and device migration. Central venous access is obtained by passing a wire into the central veins. Being able to visualize the filter is critical to ensure that the catheter or wire used during the placement procedure does not displace the filter. Also, while IVC filters are designed to capture thrombi, the foreign body itself can also be thrombogenic. Depending on the severity of thrombus in situ below the filter, thrombectomy procedures could be performed which would require that the filter be visualized. Thus, for the safety of the patients, ideally resorbable IVCFs should be capable of being monitored with conventional X-ray imaging modalities. Previously, this has been addressed by the infusion of high atomic number (high-Z) NPs such as gold [16], bismuth [17], and tungsten [18].
Gadolinium (Gd) is another high-Z element (Z = 64) with attractive properties for enhancing imaging. Most commonly used as a contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Gd chelates function by shortening T1 (longitudinal relaxation time) and T2 (transverse relaxation time) relaxation times. T1 represents the time it takes for protons to realign with the magnetic field after being disturbed by a pulse, while T2 refers to the time it takes for protons to lose phase coherence in the transverse plane. By shortening these relaxation times, Gd enhances signal intensity, thus improving the clarity and resolution of MRI scans. Beyond MRI, Gd is also considered novel for its versatility in multiple imaging modalities such as CT imaging. In its NP form (GdNP), Gd offers additional advantages, including a significantly higher surface area due to its small size and large surface-to-volume ratio, allowing the increased loading and therefore higher X-ray attenuation. This enhanced imaging capability and safety profile makes GdNPs particularly attractive for applications like infusion with PPDO IVCFs, as they can improve both the precision of filter placement and monitoring post-deployment outcomes through dual-modality imaging.
A significant challenge with most implantable medical devices, including IVCFs, is the high incidence of thrombosis. To address this issue, we hypothesize that coating IVCFs with antithrombotic drugs can reduce local clotting and mitigate this common complication. Dipyridamole (DPA; 2,6-bis-diethanolamino-4,8-dipiperidinopyrimido (5,4-d)-pyrimidine), a drug known for its antiplatelet activity, shows promise in minimizing thrombosis when integrated into medical devices [19]. This study aims to develop a novel absorbable IVCF by combining the resorbable polymer PPDO with radiopaque Gd nanoparticles (GdNPs) and the antithrombotic drug DPA. The fabricated filters were evaluated for their physicochemical properties and degradation behavior over time in an in vitro system. This work represents the first preclinical development of an absorbable IVCF that integrates both imaging capability and therapeutic functionality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Gd (III) acetate hydrate (99.9%), oleic acid (technical grade, 90%), oleylamine (technical grade, 70%), ethanol (ACS reagent grade ≥99.5%), acetone (ACS reagent grade ≥99.5%), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, ACS reagent grade ≥99.9%), dichloromethane (DCM, ACS reagent grade, ≥99.8%), PCL (average Mn 80,000), DPA (HPLC grade ≥98%), and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). WebMax 2-0 PPDO sutures were purchased from Patterson Veterinary (Liberty, MO, USA). Gd standard solution (10,021 ± 35 µg/mL) in 7% (v/v) HNO3 (density, 1.053 g/mL) was obtained from Inorganic Ventures (Christiansburg, VA, USA) and used for preparing standard Gd solutions of varying concentrations from 0 to 50 ppm. Using this, a standard graph was plotted for the estimation of Gd during the release study. A stock solution of DPA (1 mg/mL) was prepared in DMSO and used to plot a standard calibration graph for quantifying DPA in the release study. A silicone vena cava model (United Biologics, Irvine, CA, USA) connected to a Flowtek 125 pump was purchased from United Biologics (Irvine, CA, USA). All chemicals were used without further purification unless otherwise mentioned.

2.2. Synthesis and Characterization of GdNPs

GdNPs were synthesized using a thermal decomposition method. In a 500 mL round-bottom three-neck flask, Gd acetate (1.67 g, 5 mmol) was added with oleic acid (30 mL, 90 mmol) and oleylamine (100 mL, 300 mmol). The mixture was stirred using a magnetic stirrer (Isotemp, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and heated at 120 °C using a Digi-Sense Temperature Controller R/S (Boston, MA, USA) for 1 h under an argon atmosphere. Afterward, the temperature was increased to 280 °C and maintained for 6 h. The resulting metallic white solution was allowed to cool down at room temperature and then washed three times with an ethanol–acetone (1:1) solution, followed by centrifugation. The obtained precipitate was redispersed in DCM and stored until further use.
The size and morphology of synthesized GdNPs were visualized and characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEM 1010 microscope (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA, USA) and the size and distribution of the nanoparticles were estimated using ImageJ software, version 1.54 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.3. Fabrication of Radiopaque, Drug-Loaded Resorbable IVCFs

The overall schema for the fabrication of the radiopaque, drug-loaded resorbable IVCFs is shown in Supplementary Figure S1. First, IVCFs were braided by modifying an agglomerate cork (32.6 mm diameter × 36.6 mm height) with 15 zinc finishing nails (Everbilt #19 × ½ in) placed equidistantly (2.17 mm apart) at the top and bottom circumferences of the cork. WebMax PPDO sutures were wrapped around the cork by alternately looping through a nail on top and then at the bottom with 8 nail intervals. After every two turns, the suture goes up and through a round 3D-printed resorbable tip (polypropylene, 6.2 mm diameter × 1.2 mm height), printed using an S7 Ultimaker 3D-printer and designed using UltiMaker Cura 5.5.0 (Ultimaker, Utrecht, The Netherlands). This forms the conical portion of the IVCF. After braiding, the filters were annealed at 150 °C using Nuwave Bravo XL Pro Smart Oven (Vernon Hills, IL, USA). The resulting filters measured 60 mm (length) × 30 mm (diameter) and included a stent portion and a conical portion (Supplementary Figure S2).
Prior to coating with NPs, the IVCFs were soaked in DCM to wash off the purple coating. The filters were then infused with one of the following solutions using a wet-dipping method: GdNPs only (0.2 g/mL DCM) (PPDO-Gd), DPA only (1 mg/mL DMSO) (PPDO-DPA), or a combination of GdNPs and DPA (PPDO-Gd + DPA). The wet dipping procedure followed a method previously described by Damasco et al. [17]. Specifically, IVCFs were soaked in a solution of GdNPs or DPA for 5 min, air-dried, immersed in PCL for another 5 min, and air-dried again. This cycle was repeated 20 times (Supplementary Figure S1). For PPDO-Gd + DPA, the filters were alternately infused with GdNPs for 5 min, air-dried, immersed in PCL for 5 min, air-dried, immersed in DPA for 5 min, and then air-dried again, repeating this cycle for 20 cycles (Supplementary Figure S1).

2.4. Characterization and Monitoring of Radiopacity, Mechanical Strength, and Gd/DPA Release over Time

The surface morphology and elemental composition of the coated IVCFs were characterized in field-emission scanning electron microscope (Nova NanoSEM 230, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX Element EDS, Ametek, Berwyn, PA, USA) and analyzed using TEAM WDS Analysis System software (version V4.5.1-RC13 (Ametek). Radiopacity was assessed using micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT, Skyscan 1276, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), which contains a high-resolution, flat-panel detector-based system. The system features a tungsten source X-ray tube operating at 80 kV and 450 μA. The X-ray source and detector rotate around the sample, acquiring projections at 1.0-degree increments. The mechanical strength in terms of load-at-break was measured using an Expert 7601 Tension Testing System (ADMET, Norwood, MA, USA). The ADMET universal testing system was operated at a crosshead speed of 304.80 mm/min, using a high-resolution 250-lb load cell and 2KN pneumatic grippers to ensure accurate testing without slippage and precise measurements. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using MTESTQuattro™ software, version 6.02.03. Samples were analyzed in triplicate and data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
The amount of Gd and DPA was quantified using an atomic emission spectrometer (Agilent MP-AES; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Cary WinUV 60 SW, Agilent Technologies, Stanta Clara, CA, USA), respectively. Gd solutions were prepared for elemental analysis by dissolving 1 mL aliquot with 1 mL HNO3, and shaken at room temperature overnight. The samples were then diluted to 15 mL with 2% HNO3 for quantification of Gd, while the DPA in solution was quantified at 295 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Samples were analyzed in triplicate and data were presented as mean ± SD.
To monitor the radiopacity, mechanical strength, and release of Gd/DPA in vitro, IVCFs were soaked in 20 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4, 37 °C). The PBS solution was collected and replaced on days 1, 3, 5, and weekly up to 12 weeks. Micro-CT imaging was performed weekly, followed by mechanical strength testing using the universal testing system described above. Gd and DPA concentrations were analyzed from the collected PBS.
The percent (%) Gd/DPA remaining was calculated as:
T o t a l   G d   o r   D P A R e l e a s e d   G d   o r   D P A T o t a l   G d   o r   D P A × 100
where total Gd/DPA was the sum of released Gd/DPA and residual Gd/DPA in the IVCF. The Gd/DPA content was normalized to IVCF weight:
T o t a l   G d   o r   D P A I V C F   w e i g h t × 100
All samples were analyzed in triplicate, with data presented as mean ± SD.

2.5. Biocompatibility of the Materials

Cytotoxic effects of GdNPs were tested against mouse vascular aortic smooth muscle cells (MOVAS, American Type Culture Collection [ATCC], Manassas, VA, USA) and immortalized human vascular endothelial cells (EC-RF24, ATCC) using standard protocol for biological evaluation of medical devices, ISO 10993-5:2009 [20]. Cells were grown in 96-well plates with complete media for 24 h before incubating with GdNPs, DPA, and Gd-DPA-treated sutures at varying extract concentrations. Cell viability was measured after 24 h with alamarBlue cell viability assay (ThermoFisher Scientific). To prepare the IVCF extracts, control PPDO, PPDO-Gd, PPDO-DPA, and PPDO-Gd + DPA were sterilized by soaking in absolute ethanol for 1 h. Ethanol was subsequently removed by soaking the IVCFs in PBS for 15 min, followed by extensive rinsing with PBS and MEM-alpha culture media. The IVCFs (30 cm in length) were then incubated in 5 mL of MEM-alpha culture media for 24 h to generate the extracts.
Following incubation, the IVCFs were removed, and the resulting conditioned media were used for cell viability testing. EC-RF24 cells (5000 cells/well) were seeded into a 96-well flat-bottom plate in MEM-alpha culture media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin and allowed to adhere overnight at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5.5% CO2. The media were then replaced with the suture extract media at varying concentrations (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%), with 0% extract (untreated MEM-alpha culture media) serving as the viability reference (100%). Cells were incubated with the treated media for 72 h before replacing it with fresh media containing 10% alamarBlue reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific) and further incubating for 4 h. Fluorescence intensity was measured at 590 nm with excitation at 540 nm using a microplate reader (Cytation5, Biotek, Winooski, VT, USA). Each condition was tested in six replicates (n = 6) to ensure statistical robustness.
A hemolysis assay was performed by modifying the protocol by Evans et al. [21]. Erythrocytes were collected by placing fresh rat blood in green-top heparinized vacutainers (BD Vacutainer, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), washed with cold PBS, and centrifuged to collect erythrocytes. Positive controls were added with 50 µL of 10% Triton X-100, while negative controls were added with 50 µL of PBS. The remaining wells were added with three sterilized 1 cm strands of the control PPDO, PPDO-Gd, PPDO-DPA, and PPDO-Gd + DPA each. The percent lysis was calculated using the optical densities (OD) of the samples against samples containing Triton-X 100 solution. Samples were analyzed in triplicates and percent (%) hemolysis was calculated by subtracting the absorbance of the PBS control from the absorbance of the sample, dividing the difference by the difference between the absorbances of the positive and negative controls. The samples were analyzed in triplicate and data were presented as mean ± SD.

2.6. In Vitro Clot-Trapping Efficacy Experiment

First, alginate-based clots were synthesized using 2% sodium alginate solution and iron nanoparticles (0.1 mg/mL)/fluorescent dye rhodamine B (0.1 mg/mL). Once thoroughly homogenized, 1 mL suspension solution was mixed with 100 mM CaCl2 solution in a 2 mL Eppendorf tube and allowed to solidify overnight at room temperature. Solidified clots were washed with MilliQ water (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), cut (5 mm × 5 mm × 20 mm) and stored at 4 °C until further application.
A silicone vena cava model connected to a Flowtek 125 pump was used to study clot-trapping efficacy of the fabricated IVCFs. IVCFs were first implanted by inserting it through a designated insertion pouch. This was securely fastened using a screw clamp (United Biologics, Irvine, CA, USA) before setting the flow pump. The pump was then filled with about 1 L of water and allowed to flow through the model while removing air bubbles. To ensure a constant flow of water throughout the model, the pump was set at a continuous pulse at a 40% flow rate.
Clots (5 mm × 5 mm × 20 mm) were deployed through the right posterior access site in the model (representing the right iliac vein) which is secured with a hemostatic valve. The ratio of the maximum diameter of the clot to the filter is 0.33. The clots were allowed to flow towards the IVCF and clot-trapping efficiency was evaluated whether the clots were captured by the filters or not. Each cylindrical clot was only introduced once in the flow pump.
Clot-trapping efficiency experiments were also observed under fluoroscopy using a Siemens SOMATOM Definition Edge scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). To replicate soft tissue in an animal or human model, saline bags were placed over the IVC silicone model.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All studies were conducted in triplicate (n = 3) or three independent experiments. The data were presented as mean ± SD. GraphPad Prism, version 10.3.1 (464) software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to perform all statistical analyses. A two-tailed t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used where appropriate, and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of the GdNPs

The one-pot solvothermal technique of synthesizing GdNPs allowed for uniform sizing and shape of the nanoparticles as seen on the TEM in Figure 1A. The nanoparticles were seen to have a plate-like structure with an average diameter of 35.76 ± 3.71 nm (Figure 1B).

3.2. Fabrication of the Drug-Loaded, Radiopaque, and Resorbable IVCFs

Synthesized GdNPs were incorporated with PCL solution in preparation for infusion onto the PPDO sutures. Compared to the bare PPDO (control), the GdNP-, DPA-, GdNP + DPA-infused PPDO sutures resulted in a rough surface as determined by SEM (Figure 2, top). The presence of GdNPs at 1.185 keV were also confirmed using SEM-EDX (Figure 2, bottom). The method of braiding the IVCFs using a makeshift base and annealing proved effective (Figure 3), wherein the devices were able to hold their shape even after being removed from the base. The commercially available PPDO suture is dyed purple to improve its visibility during surgical procedures, as illustrated in Figure 3. This purple dye dissolves upon exposure to DCM. The infusion of GdNP, which is white, turns the suture white (PPDO-Gd), while the addition of yellow DPA imparts a yellow coloration to both PPDO-Gd and PPDO-Gd + DPA. This shows the successful infusion of GdNP and/or DPA within the PPDO suture. Initial X-ray and micro-CT imaging show that the PPDO-Gd and PPDO-Gd + DPA had increased radiopacity as compared to the control PPDO and PPDO-DPA alone.

3.3. Physicochemical Characterization

Table 1 shows the baseline physicochemical characteristics of the distinct formulations. Suture thickness (p = 0.0143) and melting temperature (p = 0.0002) statistically differed among the different groups, while load-at-break did not (p = 0.2367). Gd content was statistically higher in PPDO-Gd (p < 0.0001) compared to PPDO-Gd + DPA, while bare PPDO and PPDO-DPA did not show any trace Gd in elemental analyses. These also corresponded well with the radiopacities measured using micro-CT, where the radiopacity of PPDO-Gd was also statistically higher (p = 0.0023) compared to the radiopacity of PPDO-Gd + DPA.

3.4. Radiopacity over Time and Gd and DPA Release Studies

Figure 4A illustrates the radiopacity of the PPDO, PPDO-Gd, PPDO-DPA, and PPDO-Gd + DPA sutures over time. It is evident that the Gd-containing IVCFs had high HU values which gradually decreased over time. It can also be noted that PPDO-Gd had almost 2× higher values than that of PPDO-Gd + DPA (p < 0.0001). On week 10, about 10% of GdNPs remained in the sutures (Figure 4B) as estimated using elemental analysis. Along with radiopacity, the load-at-break also slightly decreases over time with no significant differences among the various PPDO formulations (p = 0.9181, Figure 4C). DPA release shows a similar trend as that of the Gd release, where there is an initial decrease of about 20% followed by slow steady release within the 6-week period and a sharp decline at 8 weeks for DPA-containing IVCFs revealed (Figure 4D).

3.5. In Vitro Hemolysis and Cell Viability Assays

Biocompatibility of the GdNP- and DPA-infused IVCFs were tested against RF24 (Figure 5A) and MOVAS (Figure 5B) cells. In both cell lines, the cells grown in different concentrations of treated media did not induce a significant reduction in cell viability. In addition, the hemolysis assay using rat red blood cells indicated that only Triton X-100 (positive control) showed significant hemolysis across all treatment groups (Figure 5A).

3.6. Assessing the Clot-Trapping Efficiency and Imaging of IVCFs

The clot-trapping efficacy of the fabricated absorbable IVCF was evaluated using a commercial micro-circulation system designed to mimic human venous flow (Figure 6A, left). The system, filled with ~1 L of water, was set to operate at a continuous pulse with a 40% flow rate to simulate physiological conditions. The IVCF was placed inside the device, after which an artificial alginate clot (5 × 5 × 20 mm), dyed pink for enhanced visibility, was introduced into the flow model (Figure 6A, right).
The fabricated IVCF exhibited successful clot-trapping capabilities, effectively securing the clot within the filter’s structure. Imaging was performed using fluoroscopy and micro-CT to assess radiopacity and the filter’s visibility in situ. Under fluoroscopy (Figure 6B, top), the Gd-containing IVCF showed excellent radiopacity, with individual strands clearly visible. Micro-CT imaging (Figure 6B, bottom) provided enhanced visualization of the system, showing the filter both with and without the captured clot. Red arrows highlight the position of the clot (circled), which is not visible under standard X-ray-based imaging systems.

4. Discussion

Temporary medical devices are critical in providing short-term support to patients with various medical conditions, with the intent of removal once the condition improves or resolves. A significant advantage of using absorbable materials, such as resorbable polymers, is that they can provide the necessary functionality during their active period and then gradually dissolve, being safely absorbed by the body, thus eliminating the need for surgical extraction. This approach not only minimizes the risks associated with additional surgeries but also enhances patient comfort and recovery. In this study, we introduced a multifunctional, polymeric IVCF fabricated from PPDO, which is not only absorbable but also imageable, incorporating GdNPs for radiopacity and serving as a depot for DPA to reduce clot formation. This combination allows real-time imaging and controlled drug delivery, potentially improving the therapeutic efficacy and safety of temporary implants.
GdNPs have been previously shown as an imaging enhancer for various medical devices [22,23]. Although more known as an MRI agent due to its paramagnetic properties, Gd is also a heavy metal like iodine which attenuates X-rays [24]. With a higher atomic number (Z = 64) compared to iodine (Z = 53), Gd has a stronger ability to absorb X-ray energy. It also features a higher K-edge energy (50 keV), which is better aligned with the peak intensity of the X-ray spectrum generated during CT scans, typically ranging from 50 to 60 keV at 80–140 kVp settings in modern CT systems. As a result, Gd effectively absorbs more of the X-ray energy, making it a more efficient attenuator during clinical CT imaging [24].
The infusion of GdNPs onto PPDO-Gd is significantly higher when applied alone compared to the combined application of GdNPs and DPA onto PPDO-Gd + DPA. This difference arises because diffusion is the primary mechanism governing the wet dipping method, where mass transport follows Fick’s laws of diffusion [25]. In the alternating layer-by-layer deposition on PPDO-Gd-DPA, surface saturation occurs as both GdNPs and DPA are sequentially adsorbed. This saturation reduces the availability of free surface sites for additional GdNP infusion, thereby limiting its overall incorporation. The lower amount of infused Gd in PPDO-Gd + DPA resulted in lower initial radiopacity measured. In addition, to efficiently incorporate Gd into absorbable polymers, such as PPDO, we utilized a nanoparticle form of Gd and employed a wet-dipping method alternating with PCL. GdNPs have a high surface area that allows them to easily integrate into the polymeric matrix of PPDO. The addition of PCL enhances the surface roughness of PPDO, improving the entrapment of Gd within the polymer, as seen in the studies of Damasco et al. [17] and San Valentin et al. [18]. Our study confirmed that adding PCL to PPDO increased the surface roughness, facilitating greater Gd infusion, as observed in the SEM images while maintaining the mechanical properties (Figure 2 and Figure 4B). This modification also enabled sustained release of Gd over time, with 7.88% remaining in PPDO-Gd and 7.36% in PPDO-Gd + DPA at week 12 (Figure 4A). However, the release of Gd did not correspond directly to a decrease in radiopacity. Even with approximately 7% of Gd remaining, the radiopacity was still intense. For instance, the radiopacity of PPDO-Gd decreased from 2594 ± 222 HU at week 0 to 1406 ± 147 HU at week 12 (approximately 46% reduction), and for PPDO-Gd + DPA, it decreased from 1589 ± 233 HU at week 0 to 1078 ± 227 HU at week 12 (approximately 32% reduction). This discrepancy may be due to the high initial radiopacity, meaning that even with a relatively small amount of Gd remaining, it still produced a strong signal in micro-CT imaging. Fine-tuning the concentration to start with less Gd and lower radiodensity could allow more precise monitoring of the Gd levels.
Beyond GdNPs, this study also focused on DPA, an antiplatelet drug known to inhibit platelet aggregation and prevent thrombosis. DPA’s incorporation into the IVCF offers the potential for enhancing the filter’s antithrombotic properties, minimizing clot formation, and improving device efficacy. Previous studies [26] have demonstrated that DPA-loaded devices resist platelet adhesion without compromising hemocompatibility, suggesting that its inclusion could further improve the IVCF’s ability to prevent thrombosis. DPA works by inhibiting platelet aggregation, thus preventing the formation of blood clots, which is vital for minimizing the risk of thrombosis in the IVCF. By reducing platelet activation, DPA enhances the overall anti-thrombotic properties of the filter, promoting its effectiveness in capturing and preventing the propagation of thrombi. Similarly, Dominguez-Robles et al. [27] developed a 3D-printed drug-loaded cardiovascular graft wherein they showed resistance of the device to platelet adhesion without affecting hemocompatibility and cytocompatibility in HUVEC cells. Their work also showed that increased loading of DPA onto the device also corresponded to a more effective antiplatelet activity, suggesting that our study can be further improved by exploring different concentrations of loaded DPA. However, concerns about the risk of excessive local DPA concentration following implantation remain. In our study, 0.98 mg of DPA is released within a week (Figure 4D). While burst release can sometimes lead to excessive local drug concentrations, the total DPA released in the initial phase remains below the reported cytotoxic threshold. Previous studies have indicated that acute toxicity is observed at concentrations above 200 mg in a single dose, which can lead to mild symptoms, such as dizziness, headache, and nausea. Higher doses, such as 1250 mg, have been reported in cases of overdose [28]. In our system, the initial release does not reach this level, suggesting that the burst phase is unlikely to pose a significant cytotoxic risk. Moreover, while several studies have investigated drug-coated metallic IVCFs (e.g., rapamycin, heparin, and paclitaxel) primarily to combat neointimal hyperplasia [29,30], this is the first study on DPA-loaded absorbable IVCFs. The systemic effect of the DPA resorbs was not evaluated during this study but we plan to assess plasma drug concentration levels in future work to evaluate systemic DPA exposure. Furthermore, this study evaluated the performance of the device in vitro while in quiescent conditions. In future studies, a more dynamic setup simulating the complex components and behavior of the circulatory system will enhance the analysis of the device. This will allow for a more in-depth assessment of the interactions between the device and the blood microenvironment. Moreover, surface and molecular interactions that may or may not interfere with the release or mechanism of DPA should also be considered in future experiments to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of combination therapies.
Although there were no significant differences in load-at-break among the groups tested at week 0, the thickness and melting temperature (Tm) of PPDO slightly decreased with the addition of GdNPs and DPA. This decrease in Tm is likely due to modifications in the crystalline and amorphous regions of PPDO caused by the incorporation of GdNPs and DPA, a phenomenon observed in previous studies of polymer composites [31,32]. Despite these initial differences in Tm, our in vitro evaluation demonstrated that all fabricated IVCFs, including those loaded with GdNPs and/or DPA, degraded over time without negatively affecting the material’s inherent degradation properties. Although we expected to have a sharp decrease in load-at-break starting at week 6 as shown by Eggers et al. [33], we did not see this trend in all of our IVCFs. This is due to the in vitro system that was used in the study where IVCFs were soaked in PBS at room temperature with shaking compared to Eggers’ system that used a more elaborate closed-loop venous flow simulator with controlled flow, pressure, pH, temperature, viscosity and density to mimic blood [15,33]. On the other hand, the release profiles of GdNPs and DPA followed a predictable trend, with a rapid initial release phase transitioning into a steady release phase, consistent with the degradation kinetics observed for radiopaque resorbable IVCFs previously developed [17,18].
Additionally, the IVCFs demonstrated excellent biocompatibility in vitro, as evidenced by the lack of cytotoxic effects and the maintenance of cell viability in endothelial and smooth muscle cell lines. One of the most significant advantages of this approach is the clot-trapping capability of the IVCF, which was demonstrated in a controlled vena cava flow model. The 40% flow rate in a vena cava flow model represents a controlled percentage of the system’s maximum flow capacity, used to simulate blood flow under reproducible, physiological conditions. In the human inferior vena cava (IVC), the average blood flow rate is typically around 2 to 3 L per minute. Setting the flow rate to 40% of the system’s maximum capacity mimics this normal blood flow at approximately 1.2 L per minute, providing a moderate yet accurate representation of IVC dynamics [34]. This flow rate ensures that the experiment avoids excessive turbulence while still reflecting realistic blood flow, allowing for effective testing of IVC filters and other medical devices in a controlled environment. We opted for alginate because of its ability to mimic the mechanical properties of blood clots, providing a stable and reproducible model for testing medical devices [35,36]. Alginate’s gel-like properties allow for precise control over clot size and consistency, ensuring standardized experimental conditions. It is non-biological, reducing safety concerns, and is easy to handle in laboratory settings. Additionally, alginate clots can be dyed to improve visibility under imaging techniques and may also be loaded with imaging agents for fluoroscopy and CT. The results in Figure 6B show the enhanced visibility of the IVCFs containing Gd (PPDO-Gd and PPDO-Gd + DPA), even the single strands using the axial micro-CT images. The same is true for fluoroscopy images which are helpful for device implantation since usually this is the imaging modality that is used when the device is placed.
Although the results from this study are promising, there are several limitations. First, the in vitro degradation testing may not fully replicate in vivo conditions, where biological factors, such as blood flow and pressure, pH, and the presence of enzymes, could influence the degradation rate and performance. Second, the absence of in vitro and in vivo testing for DPA’s efficacy and long-term biological effects leaves some uncertainties regarding its performance in a living organism. Future studies involving large animal models are needed to further assess the degradation, efficacy, and overall performance of the PPDO-Gd-DPA IVCF in a dynamic biological environment. Additionally, the design and findings from this study could be translated to other absorbable medical devices, such as stents and sutures, with temporary functionality and long-term risks, offering the potential for improvements in patient care across multiple clinical areas.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating GdNPs and DPA into absorbable IVCFs to enhance both imaging capabilities and therapeutic functionality. The GdNPs successfully improved the radiopacity of the filter, enabling better visualization under multiple imaging modalities, while the potential of DPA to reduce thrombosis presents an exciting avenue for future research and applications for IVCFs. However, limitations such as the lack of in vivo testing for this novel device and the limited clot-trapping duration of the filter due to its absorbable nature highlight the need for further investigation. Furthermore, large animal models are essential to validate the long-term efficacy and safety of this novel approach. Overall, the development of absorbable IVCFs with dual imaging and therapeutic properties offers promising potential not only for vascular interventions but also for other medical applications requiring temporary yet effective treatment solutions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym17060716/s1, Figure S1: Schema for the fabrication of GdNP, DPA, and GdNP + DPA-loaded IVCFs, Figure S2: Fabrication process of the IVCF.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.T.M., E.M.S.V. and S.Y.H.; investigation, S.T.M., E.M.S.V., D.K.M.B., M.R.B., A.M., G.C. (Gino Canlas), G.C. (Gouthami Chintalapani), M.C.J., A.J.R.B. and S.Y.H.; data curation, S.T.M., E.M.S.V., D.K.M.B., M.R.B., A.M., G.C. (Gino Canlas), G.C. (Gouthami Chintalapani), M.C.J., A.J.R.B. and S.Y.H.; formal analysis, S.T.M., E.M.S.V., D.K.M.B., M.R.B., A.M., G.C. (Gino Canlas), G.C. (Gouthami Chintalapani), M.C.J., A.J.R.B. and S.Y.H.; writing—original draft preparation, S.T.M. and E.M.S.V.; writing—review and editing, S.T.M., E.M.S.V., D.K.M.B., M.R.B., A.M., G.C. (Gino Canlas), G.C. (Gouthami Chintalapani), M.C.J., A.J.R.B. and S.Y.H.; visualization, S.T.M., E.M.S.V., D.K.M.B., M.R.B., A.M., G.C. (Gino Canlas), G.C. (Gouthami Chintalapani), M.C.J., A.J.R.B. and S.Y.H.; supervision, S.Y.H.; project administration, S.Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health—National Cancer Institute (MD Anderson’s Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA016672; used the Research Animal Support Facility and Small Animal Imaging Facility).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the MD Anderson Cancer Center’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (protocol code: 1882-RN01 and date of approval: 22 September 2021). The mouse vascular aortic smooth muscle cells (MOVAS) were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA), and immortalized human vascular endothelial cells (EC-RF24) were also obtained from ATCC.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are provided as Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would also like to acknowledge Kenneth Dunner Jr. at the High-Resolution Electron Microscopy Facility for assisting with TEM, James Gu from the Houston Methodist Electron Microscopy Core for his expertise in SEM-EDX mapping, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Dunn Research Foundation Center for Radiological Sciences, and MD Anderson’s Small Animal Imaging Facility.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Gouthami Chintalapani was employed by the company Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vach Agocsova, S.; Culenova, M.; Birova, I.; Omanikova, L.; Moncmanova, B.; Danisovic, L.; Ziaran, S.; Bakos, D.; Alexy, P. Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3d Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review. Materials 2023, 16, 4267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Klusman, C.; Martin, B.; Perez, J.V.D.; Barcena, A.J.R.; Bernardino, M.R.; Valentin, E.M.D.S.; Damasco, J.A.; Del Mundo, H.C.; Court, K.A.; Godin, B.; et al. Rosuvastatin-Eluting Gold-Nanoparticle-Loaded Perivascular Wrap for Enhanced Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation in a Murine Model. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2023, 5, 1986–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Barcena AJ, R.; Perez, J.V.D.; Bernardino, M.R.; Valentin, E.M.D.S.; Damasco, J.A.; Klusman, C.; Martin, B.; Court, K.A.; Godin, B.; Canlas, G.; et al. Controlled Delivery of Rosuvastatin or Rapamycin through Electrospun Bismuth Nanoparticle-Infused Perivascular Wraps Promotes Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 33159–33168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. VanEpps, J.S.; Younger, J.G. Implantable Device-Related Infection. Shock 2016, 46, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Anderson, J.M.; Rodriguez, A.; Chang, D.T. Foreign Body Reaction to Biomaterials. Semin. Immunol. 2008, 20, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Catanese, L. Pulmonary Embolism: Symptoms, Causes, Risk Factors, and Treatment; Harvard Health Publishing: Boston, MA, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/pulmonary-embolism-symptoms-causes-risk-factors-and-treatment (accessed on 23 December 2024).
  7. Essien, E.O.; Rali, P.; Mathai, S.C. Pulmonary Embolism. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 103, 549–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Penn Medicine. Pulmonary Embolism (Pulmonary Embolus). Available online: https://www.pennmedicine.org/for-patients-and-visitors/patient-information/conditions-treated-a-to-z/pulmonary-embolus#:~:text=A%20pulmonary%20embolism%20can%20be,arrhythmia%2C%20an%20irregular%20heart%20rhythm (accessed on 23 December 2024).
  9. Kaufman, J.A.; Barnes, G.D.; Chaer, R.A.; Cuschieri, J.; Eberhardt, R.T.; Johnson, M.S.; Kuo, W.T.; Murin, S.; Patel, S.; Rajasekhar, A.; et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Clinical Practice Guideline for Inferior Vena Cava Filters in the Treatment of Patients with Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, American Heart Association, Society for Vascular Surgery, and Society for Vascular Medicine. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2020, 31, 1529–1544. [Google Scholar]
  10. Arous, E.J.; Messina, L.M. Temporary Inferior Vena Cava Filters: How Do We Move Forward? Chest 2016, 149, 1143–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Buso, G.; Alatri, A.; Calanca, L.; Fresa, M.; Qanadli, S.D.; Pesavento, R.; Mazzolai, L. Why Optional Inferior Vena Cava Filters Are Not Always Retrieved? A Real World 19 Years Experience in a Swiss Tertiary Care University Hospital. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2020, 76, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Thors, A.; Muck, P. Resorbable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Trial in an in-Vivo Porcine Model. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2011, 22, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, C.; Ma, F.; Gao, C.; Kang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Liu, P.; Jiang, H.; Chang, Z. Design and Evaluation of a Novel Biodegradable Inferior Vena Cava Filter. J. Biomater. Appl. 2019, 33, 1060–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, F.; Li, H.; Liang, G.; Zhang, H. Development and Evaluation of a New Biodegradable Vena Cava Filter in a Canine Model. Asian J. Surg. 2017, 40, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Eggers, M.D.; Reitman, C.A. In Vitro Analysis of Polymer Candidates for the Development of Absorbable Vascular Filters. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2012, 23, 1023–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tian, L.; Lee, P.; Singhana, B.; Chen, A.; Qiao, Y.; Lu, L.; Martinez, J.; Tasciotti, E.; Jacobsen, M.C.; Melancon, A.; et al. In Vivo Imaging of Radiopaque Resorbable Inferior Vena Cava Filter Infused with Gold Nanoparticles. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2018, 10576, 105762S. [Google Scholar]
  17. Damasco, J.A.; Huang, S.Y.; Perez, J.V.D.; Manongdo, J.A.T.; Dixon, K.A.; Williams, M.L.; Jacobsen, M.C.; Barbosa, R.; Canlas, G.M.; Chintalapani, G.; et al. Bismuth Nanoparticle and Polyhydroxybutyrate Coatings Enhance the Radiopacity of Absorbable Inferior Vena Cava Filters for Fluoroscopy-Guided Placement and Longitudinal Computed Tomography Monitoring in Pigs. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8, 1676–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. San Valentin, E.M.; Damasco, J.A.; Bernardino, M.; Court, K.A.; Godin, B.; Canlas, G.M.; Melancon, A.; Chintalapani, G.; Jacobsen, M.C.; Norton, W.; et al. Image-Guided Deployment and Monitoring of a Novel Tungsten Nanoparticle-Infused Radiopaque Absorbable Inferior Vena Cava Filter in a Swine Model. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2024, 35, 113–121.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. FitzGerald, G.A. Dipyridamole. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987, 316, 1247–1257. [Google Scholar]
  20. ISO 10993-5:2009; Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  21. Evans, B.C.; Nelson, C.E.; Yu, S.S.; Beavers, K.R.; Kim, A.J.; Li, H.; Nelson, H.M.; Giorgio, T.D.; Duvall, C.L. Ex Vivo Red Blood Cell Hemolysis Assay for the Evaluation of Ph-Responsive Endosomolytic Agents for Cytosolic Delivery of Biomacromolecular Drugs. J. Vis. Exp. 2013, 73, e50166. [Google Scholar]
  22. Silina, E.V.; Manturova, N.E.; Chuvilina, E.L.; Gasanov, A.A.; Andreeva, O.I.; Pugachevskii, M.A.; Kochura, A.V.; Kryukov, A.A.; Suzdaltseva, Y.G.; Stupin, V.A. Biomedical Application Prospects of Gadolinium Oxide Nanoparticles for Regenerative Medicine. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, H.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, H.; Gu, Z.; Gong, Q.; Luo, K. Functional Gadolinium-Based Nanoscale Systems for Cancer Theranostics. J. Control. Release 2021, 329, 482–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Perez, J.V.D.; Jacobsen, M.C.; Damasco, J.A.; Melancon, A.; Huang, S.Y.; Layman, R.R.; Melancon, M.P. Optimization of the Differentiation and Quantification of High-Z Nanoparticles Incorporated in Medical Devices for Ct-Guided Interventions. Med. Phys. 2021, 48, 300–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Crank, J. The Mathematics of Diffusion; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  26. Adhami, M.; Martin, N.K.; Maguire, C.; Courtenay, A.J.; Donnelly, R.F.; Domínguez-Robles, J.; Larrañeta, E. Drug Loaded Implantable Devices to Treat Cardiovascular Disease. Expert. Opin. Drug Deliv. 2023, 20, 507–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Domínguez-Robles, J.; Shen, T.; Cornelius, V.A.; Corduas, F.; Mancuso, E.; Donnelly, R.F.; Margariti, A.; Lamprou, D.A.; Larrañeta, E. Development of Drug Loaded Cardiovascular Prosthesis for Thrombosis Prevention Using 3d Printing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 129, 112375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, Z.C.; Kwan, C.M.; Chen, J.H. Profound Shock Resulting from a Large Dose of Dipyridamole. Int. J. Cardiol. 1994, 46, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, H.; Zhang, F.; Liang, G.; Ye, L.; Zhang, H.; Niu, L.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, M. Preparation and Experimental Research into Retrievable Rapamycin- and Heparin-Coated Vena Cava Filters: A Pilot Study. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2016, 41, 422–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. De Gregorio, M.A.; Gimeno, M.J.; Lostalé, F.; Iñigo, P.; Artigas, M.C.; Viloria, A.; Alfonso, V.R.; D’Agostino, H. Retrievability of Uncoated Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Günther-Tulip Ivc Filters in an Animal Model. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2004, 15, 719–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lipińska, M. The Effect of Various Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxanes on Viscoelastic, Thermal Properties and Crystallization of Poly(Ε-Caprolactone) Nanocomposites. Polymers 2022, 14, 5078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liu, J.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Liu, C.; Gross, R.A.; Kyriakides, T.R.; Saltzman, W.M. Biodegradation, Biocompatibility, and Drug Delivery in Poly(Ω-Pentadecalactone-Co-P-Dioxanone) Copolyesters. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 6646–6654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Eggers, M.D.; McArthur, M.J.; Figueira, T.A.; Abdelsalam, M.E.; Dixon, K.P.; Pageon, L.R.; Wallace, M.J.; Huang, S.Y. Pilot in Vivo Study of an Absorbable Polydioxanone Vena Cava Filter. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2015, 3, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cheng, C.P.; Herfkens, R.J.; Taylor, C.A. Inferior Vena Caval Hemodynamics Quantified in Vivo at Rest and during Cycling Exercise Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003, 284, H1161–H1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gravastrand, C.; Hamad, S.; Fure, H.; Steinkjer, B.; Ryan, L.; Oberholzer, J.; Lambris, J.D.; Lacík, I.; Mollnes, T.E.; Espevik, T.; et al. Alginate Microbeads Are Coagulation Compatible, While Alginate Microcapsules Activate Coagulation Secondary to Complement or Directly through Fxii. Acta Biomater. 2017, 58, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gao, W.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Tang, Q.; Wu, P.; Lin, T.; Li, T.; Sun, D. Sodium Alginate-Hydrogel Coatings on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Anticoagulation. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 966649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Synthesis and characterization of gadolinium nanoparticles (GdNPs). (A) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) image shows that the synthesized GdNPs have a plate-like structure. (B) Quantification of the size of GdNPs using ImageJ software, version 1.54 resulted in an average diameter of 35.76 ± 3.71 nm.
Figure 1. Synthesis and characterization of gadolinium nanoparticles (GdNPs). (A) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) image shows that the synthesized GdNPs have a plate-like structure. (B) Quantification of the size of GdNPs using ImageJ software, version 1.54 resulted in an average diameter of 35.76 ± 3.71 nm.
Polymers 17 00716 g001
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and gadolinium (Gd) mapping using energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy. Control poly-p-dioxanone (PPDO) sutures had a smooth surface, and addition of Gd and/or dipyridamole (DPA) increased the roughness of the surface of the PPDO sutures. The peak at 1.185 keV confirms the presence of Gd. A platinum (Pt) peak at 2.05 keV is also evident due to the sputter coat used for SEM.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and gadolinium (Gd) mapping using energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy. Control poly-p-dioxanone (PPDO) sutures had a smooth surface, and addition of Gd and/or dipyridamole (DPA) increased the roughness of the surface of the PPDO sutures. The peak at 1.185 keV confirms the presence of Gd. A platinum (Pt) peak at 2.05 keV is also evident due to the sputter coat used for SEM.
Polymers 17 00716 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of the photograph, X-ray, and micro-computed tomography (mCT) images of the various poly-p-dioxanone (PPDO) formulations. Gadolinium (Gd)-containing PPDO sutures (PPDO-Gd and PPDO-Gd + DPA) had increased signal enhancement in X-ray and mCT imaging as compared to control PPDO and PPDO-DPA. DPA, dipyridamole.
Figure 3. Comparison of the photograph, X-ray, and micro-computed tomography (mCT) images of the various poly-p-dioxanone (PPDO) formulations. Gadolinium (Gd)-containing PPDO sutures (PPDO-Gd and PPDO-Gd + DPA) had increased signal enhancement in X-ray and mCT imaging as compared to control PPDO and PPDO-DPA. DPA, dipyridamole.
Polymers 17 00716 g003
Figure 4. Longitudinal monitoring of radiopacity, mechanical strength, gadolinium (Gd), and dipyridamole (DPA) release over 10–12 weeks. (A) Radiopacity, measured in Hounsfield units (HU), decreased gradually over time, mirroring the decreasing trend in mechanical strength (B), assessed as load-at-break in kilograms (kg). (C,D) Gd and DPA content showed steady reductions, reflecting their controlled release over the study period. PPDO, poly-p-dioxanone. Error bars represent the SD of the mean.
Figure 4. Longitudinal monitoring of radiopacity, mechanical strength, gadolinium (Gd), and dipyridamole (DPA) release over 10–12 weeks. (A) Radiopacity, measured in Hounsfield units (HU), decreased gradually over time, mirroring the decreasing trend in mechanical strength (B), assessed as load-at-break in kilograms (kg). (C,D) Gd and DPA content showed steady reductions, reflecting their controlled release over the study period. PPDO, poly-p-dioxanone. Error bars represent the SD of the mean.
Polymers 17 00716 g004
Figure 5. In vitro cell viability and hemolysis assays. (A) Treatment of immortalized human vascular endothelial (EC-RF24) and smooth muscle cells (MOVAS) with varying concentrations of treated cell media with all formulations did not show significant cytotoxicity (p < 0.05). Cells were incubated in treated media for 24 h before cytotoxicity assay with 10% alamarBlue. (B) Hemolysis assay shows no significant differences among the various groups (p = 0.0596). Triton X was used as the positive control. DPA, dipyridamole; Gd, gadolinium; PPDO, poly-p-dioxanone.
Figure 5. In vitro cell viability and hemolysis assays. (A) Treatment of immortalized human vascular endothelial (EC-RF24) and smooth muscle cells (MOVAS) with varying concentrations of treated cell media with all formulations did not show significant cytotoxicity (p < 0.05). Cells were incubated in treated media for 24 h before cytotoxicity assay with 10% alamarBlue. (B) Hemolysis assay shows no significant differences among the various groups (p = 0.0596). Triton X was used as the positive control. DPA, dipyridamole; Gd, gadolinium; PPDO, poly-p-dioxanone.
Polymers 17 00716 g005
Figure 6. Clot-trapping efficacy and imaging. A vena cava flow model (A, left) was used to evaluate the in vitro clot trapping of the various IVCFs at week 0 using an artificial alginate clot (5 mm × 5 mm × 20 mm). The system contained ~1 L of water at 40% flow rate. (A, right). All the fabricated resorbable inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) successfully captured the clot (red arrow, circled). X-ray imaging of the system included fluoroscopy (top) and CT with and without clots (bottom), demonstrating the enhanced visibility of the IVCF (B). White arrows indicate position of the IVCF in fluoroscopy where only gadolinium (Gd)-containing IVCFs are visible. Strands of the Gd-containing IVCF, including PPDO-Gd and PPDO-Gd + DPA, exhibited clear radiopacity under both imaging modalities. Clots are difficult to see with standard X-ray imaging. DPA, dipyridamole; PPDO, poly-p-dioxanone.
Figure 6. Clot-trapping efficacy and imaging. A vena cava flow model (A, left) was used to evaluate the in vitro clot trapping of the various IVCFs at week 0 using an artificial alginate clot (5 mm × 5 mm × 20 mm). The system contained ~1 L of water at 40% flow rate. (A, right). All the fabricated resorbable inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) successfully captured the clot (red arrow, circled). X-ray imaging of the system included fluoroscopy (top) and CT with and without clots (bottom), demonstrating the enhanced visibility of the IVCF (B). White arrows indicate position of the IVCF in fluoroscopy where only gadolinium (Gd)-containing IVCFs are visible. Strands of the Gd-containing IVCF, including PPDO-Gd and PPDO-Gd + DPA, exhibited clear radiopacity under both imaging modalities. Clots are difficult to see with standard X-ray imaging. DPA, dipyridamole; PPDO, poly-p-dioxanone.
Polymers 17 00716 g006
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of the inferior vena cava filters.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of the inferior vena cava filters.
Suture Thickness (cm)Melting Temperature, Tm (°C)Load-at-Break (kg)Gd Content (mg/g)Radiopacity (HU)DPA Content (mg/g)
Control0.39 ± 0.00105.90 ± 0.305.24 ± 0.120−130 ± 380
PPDO-Gd0.49 ± 0.05103.32 ± 0.684.39 ± 0.87371 ± 1.602713 ± 1050
PPDO-DPA0.41 ± 0.00104.13 ± 0.204.60 ± 0.640−135 ± 17218.20 ± 5.38
PPDO-Gd + DPA0.42 ± 0.03103.61 ± 0.085.38 ± 0.65280 ± 0.311516 ± 28112.91 ± 0.83
Abbreviations: DPA, dipyridamole; Gd, gadolinium; HU, Hounsfield unit; PPDO, poly-p-dioxanone.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Melancon, S.T.; San Valentin, E.M.; Bolinas, D.K.M.; Bernardino, M.R.; Mishra, A.; Canlas, G.; Chintalapani, G.; Jacobsen, M.C.; Barcena, A.J.R.; Huang, S.Y. Fabrication of Radiopaque, Drug-Loaded Resorbable Polymer for Medical Device Development. Polymers 2025, 17, 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17060716

AMA Style

Melancon ST, San Valentin EM, Bolinas DKM, Bernardino MR, Mishra A, Canlas G, Chintalapani G, Jacobsen MC, Barcena AJR, Huang SY. Fabrication of Radiopaque, Drug-Loaded Resorbable Polymer for Medical Device Development. Polymers. 2025; 17(6):716. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17060716

Chicago/Turabian Style

Melancon, Sophie T., Erin Marie San Valentin, Dominic Karl M. Bolinas, Marvin R. Bernardino, Archana Mishra, Gino Canlas, Gouthami Chintalapani, Megan C. Jacobsen, Allan John R. Barcena, and Steven Y. Huang. 2025. "Fabrication of Radiopaque, Drug-Loaded Resorbable Polymer for Medical Device Development" Polymers 17, no. 6: 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17060716

APA Style

Melancon, S. T., San Valentin, E. M., Bolinas, D. K. M., Bernardino, M. R., Mishra, A., Canlas, G., Chintalapani, G., Jacobsen, M. C., Barcena, A. J. R., & Huang, S. Y. (2025). Fabrication of Radiopaque, Drug-Loaded Resorbable Polymer for Medical Device Development. Polymers, 17(6), 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17060716

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop