Next Article in Journal
Association of Dietary Inflammatory Index with Serum IL-6, IL-10, and CRP Concentration during Pregnancy
Previous Article in Journal
The Cost of Diets According to Their Caloric Share of Ultraprocessed and Minimally Processed Foods in Belgium
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/nu12092788
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Clinical Significance of Analysis of Vitamin D Status in Various Diseases

by
Magdalena Kowalówka
1,
Anna K. Główka
1,
Marta Karaźniewicz-Łada
2,* and
Grzegorz Kosewski
1
1
Department of Bromatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 42 Marcelińska Street, 60-354 Poznań, Poland
2
Department of Physical Pharmacy and Pharmacokinetics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 6 Święcickiego Street, 60-781 Poznań, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(9), 2788; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092788
Submission received: 29 July 2020 / Revised: 3 September 2020 / Accepted: 8 September 2020 / Published: 11 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Micronutrients and Human Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vitamin D plays a role not only in the proper functioning of the skeletal system and the calcium-phosphate equilibrium, but also in the immune system, the cardiovascular system and the growth and division of cells. Although numerous studies have reported on the analysis of vitamin D status in various groups of patients, the clinical significance of measurements of vitamin D forms and metabolites remains ambiguous. This article reviews the reports analyzing the status of vitamin D in various chronic states. Particular attention is given to factors affecting measurement of vitamin D forms and metabolites. Relevant papers published during recent years were identified by an extensive PubMed search using appropriate keywords. Measurement of vitamin D status proved to be a useful tool in diagnosis and progression of metabolic syndrome, neurological disorders and cancer. High performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry has become the preferred method for analyzing the various forms and metabolites of vitamin D in biological fluids. Factors influencing vitamin D concentration, including socio-demographic and biochemical factors as well as the genetic polymorphism of the vitamin D receptor, along with vitamin D transporters and enzymes participating in vitamin D metabolism should be considered as potential confounders of the interpretation of plasma total 25(OH)D concentrations.

1. Introduction

Vitamin D involves six different steroid hormones with different activities: the inactive endogenous precursor—cholecalciferol (D3), partially active calcidiol (25(OH)D3), its active dihydroxy-form calcitriol (1,25(OH)2D3), a plant-derived inactive form—ergocalciferol (D2), and its metabolites, 25(OH)D2 and 1,25(OH)2D2 [1]. Calcitriol has a key role to play in calcium and phosphate homeostasis, cell proliferation and differentiation, and in the responses of the immune and nervous systems [2]. In the last two decades novel functions of vitamin D have been discovered including protection against cardiovascular disease, diabetes and colorectal cancer, neuroprotective activity, oxidative stress reduction, xenobiotic detoxification, and antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity [3]. Vitamin D’s mechanism involves binding calcitriol to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), which is a transcription factor positively or negatively regulating the expression of genes that mediate its biological activity. Wide distribution of the VDR in all cell types may explain its multiple actions on different tissues [4]. As the function of VDR may be influenced by circulating levels of vitamin D, assessment of vitamin D status in the body may be clinically valuable to predict patients’ susceptibility to certain diseases. Only 25-hydroxy vitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D have clinical significance, thus total 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentration is the most valuable for evaluating vitamin D status in the body and for subsequent therapeutic decisions [5]. There are many commercially available 25-hydroxyvitamin D methods based on the immunoassay technique used by laboratories for determination of vitamin D status. Recently, high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) has become the preferable method because it overcomes inaccuracy problems associated with immunoassays and protein binding assays [6]. The underlying causes of inter-assay variability involve tight binding of vitamin D metabolites to vitamin D-binding protein, cross-reaction with 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, or various specificities against 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3. Moreover, the HPLC-MS/MS technique allows the separation of C3-epimers of vitamin D metabolites, differing from the primary molecules only in stereochemistry. Lack of such separation may lead to inaccuracies in 25(OH)D measurements [7].
A number of environmental and biological factors influence vitamin D status. These factors include variation in sun exposure, age, sex, obesity, or chronic illnesses [8]. Moreover, it has been shown that polymorphisms of genes involved in the metabolism, catabolism, transport, or binding of vitamin D to VDR might affect vitamin D concentrations [9].
This review evaluates the role of vitamin D measurements in prediction and treatment of certain diseases, summarizes analytical techniques used for determination of vitamin D concentrations, and briefly discusses the contribution of various factors to vitamin D status in specific populations.

2. Synthesis and Metabolism

The main sources of vitamin D are certain foods, dietary supplements, and exposure to ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation from sunlight (290–315 nm) [10]. Diet sources include oily sea fish and fish oil, and to a lesser extent egg yolks and dairy products, mainly in the form of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), which is highly bioavailable. Vitamin D2 (calciferol) is present in products of plant origin and in mushrooms. However, most diets contain only small amounts of vitamin D, and in some countries few foods, such as milk or margarine, are fortified with vitamin D [10,11]. Ninety percent of the body’s pool of this compound constitutes skin synthesis. Endogenous vitamin D3 synthesis occurs in the keratinocytes. Stimulation of 7-dehydrocholesterol by UVB leads to pre-vitamin D3 formation, and depends on skin pigmentation and on the latitude, season, and time of day [10]. Then pre-vitamin D3 undergoes thermal isomerization to form vitamin D3 or converts to lumisterol and tachysterol under UVB irradiation [12].
Vitamin D2 and D3 are biologically inactive and their serum concentration is very low. According to the literature data, the concentration of D3 in normal subjects was 6.6 ± 3.0 ng/mL while D2 was below limit of detection [13]. Both vitamins, D2 and D3, are highly lipophilic and must be carried in the aqueous environment of blood by protein transporters. Vitamin D2 and D3 taken orally are absorbed from the intestines, and then transported by chylomicrons, which are further processed into lipoproteins. Endogenously produced D3 is carried by D-binding protein (DBP) [1]. In the liver, the hydroxylation of both vitamin D2 and D3 leads to the formation of the biologically inactive prohormones 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 (calcifediol). This process is catalyzed by enzymes possessing 25-hydroxylase activity, such as CYP2R1 and CYP27A1 [4] (Figure 1). Currently, the total serum concentration of 25(OH)D is considered the best indicator of vitamin D status in the body [14]. The Institute of Medicine suggests that serum 25(OH)D concentrations greater than 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) can be considered sufficient, while values between 12 and 20 ng/mL (30–50 nmol/L) are insufficient, and lower than 12 ng/mL (30 nmol/L) are deficient [15]. The dominating 25(OH)D form circulating in the body is 25(OH)D3 with concentration in the range of 2.2–42.7 ng/mL in healthy subjects, while the level of 25(OH)D2 is 0.2–15.9 ng/mL [16]. Further hydroxylation of 25-hydroxyvitamins takes place mainly in the kidney by 1α-hydroxylase (mitochondrial CYP27B1) resulting in production of 1,25(OH)2D2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 (calcitriol). This process is regulated by serum calcium and phosphate, as well as parathyroid hormone (PTH) [17]. 1,25(OH)2D is the most biologically active form of vitamin D. It controls intestinal absorption of calcium and phosphate, stimulates osteoclast activity, and helps regulate the release of parathyroid hormone [2]. Both forms 1,25(OH)2D2 and 1,25(OH)2D3 can bind to VDR, although 1,25(OH)2D3 has proven to be significantly more potent [18]. Reference values determined in healthy subjects by Dirks et al. were 59–159 pmol/L for 1,25(OH)2D3 and <17 pmol/L for 1,25(OH)2D2 [19].
25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D can be converted by CYP24A1 to 24,25(OH)2D and 1,24,25(OH)3D, respectively. 24,25(OH)2D appears to be required for optimal endochondral bone formation and bone fraction repair [20]. It possesses a circulating half-life of seven days and concentrations in ng/mL (0.084–9.514 ng/mL [16]). The metabolite is regarded as a useful marker of vitamin D catabolism [21]. In patients with CYP24A1 mutations, 24,25(OH)2D levels are low or even undetectable despite the presence of adequate amounts of the substrate 25(OH)D. Low concentration of 24,25(OH)2D and normal-to-high concentrations of 25(OH)D have been found in children with idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia carrying mutations of CYP24A1 [22]. It was suggested that 1,24,25(OH)3D may have biological activity because it shows substantial affinity for the VDR [2]. The enzyme can also catalyze the C23 lactone pathway resulting in the formation of 1,25(OH)2D-26,23 lactone and 25(OH)D-26,23 lactone [4]. Thus, the primary function of CYP24A1 is to prevent the accumulation of 1,25(OH)2D and 25(OH)D. Moreover, vitamin D metabolites may undergo an epimerization process by 3-epimerase. The enzyme isomerizes the C-3 hydroxy group of the A ring from the α to β orientation. Clinical significance of the 3-epimers is unknown but reduced binding of 3-epi-25(OH)D to DBP and reduced affinity of 3-epi-1,25(OH)2D for the VDR were reported [2]. Evidence suggests that 3-epi-1,25(OH)2D suppresses PTH as effectively as 1,25(OH)2D. Moreover, 3-epi-1,25(OH)2D3 can boost the synthesis of surfactant phospholipids and affect gene expression to activate the synthesis of surfactant protein-B in pulmonary alveolar type II [23]. Levels of the 3-epimers in the human body are low and rarely detected. Serum concentrations of 3-epi-25(OH)D3 in normal subjects were in the range of 0.4–6.0 ng/mL [16]. In keratinocytes, 20-hydroxylation of vitamin D by CYP11A1 takes place, resulting in formation of 20(OH)D and 20,23(OH)2D. Biological activity of 20(OH)D3 was confirmed in the induction of keratinocyte differentiation [24]. It was reported that the compound inhibits DNA synthesis in epidermal keratinocytes, melanocytes, and melanoma cells through activation of VDR [25].

3. Mechanism of Action

1,25(OH)2D3, the active form of vitamin D, acts as steroid hormone by binding to VDR that is omnipresent throughout the body. VDR is a transcription factor that forms a complex with another intracellular receptor, the retinoid-X receptor (RXR). The genomic mechanism of vitamin D action involves the direct binding of 1,25(OH)2D3 activated VDR/RXR to specific DNA sequences called vitamin D response elements (VDREs) resulting in either activation or inhibition of transcription. By turning genes on or off, this complex controls intestine calcium and phosphate absorption, renal calcium reabsorption and phosphate loss, and bone homeostasis. Other VDR dependent effects involve regulation of hormone secretion, cell differentiation and proliferation, and immune function. 1,25(OH)2D inhibits PTH production and secretion by PTH gene suppression, stimulates insulin secretion in pancreatic beta cells, and stimulates fibroblast growth factor (FGF) production in osteoblasts and osteocytes. It was reported that vitamin D slows down cancer cell growth by such mechanisms as stimulation of the expression of cell cycle inhibitors p21 and p27, activation of the expression of the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin, inhibition of the transcriptional activity of b-catenin, and controlling angiogenesis [26]. The immunomodulatory effect of 1,25(OH)2D3 involves stimulation of antimicrobial peptides, cathelicidin and defensin β2, reducing T cell proliferation, modulating T cell differentiation, and inhibition of the maturation of dendritic cells important for antigen presentation [27].
1,25(OH)2D also has effects on selected cells that do not involve gene regulation and are mediated by a membrane receptor. This mechanism regulates calcium and chloride channel activity, activation and distribution of protein kinase C, and phospholipase C activity in osteoblasts, liver, muscle, and intestine cells [2].

4. Methods of Analysis of Vitamin D in Biological Fluids

Serum levels of the biologically active metabolite 1,25(OH)2D may be difficult to measure because half-life of this compound is about 4 h and its production is regulated by hormones and minerals [28]. 25(OH)D is employed as a biomarker for overall vitamin D status because its half-life is two–three weeks and its concentration accounts for both dietary vitamin D intake and endogenous synthesis of vitamin D in the skin [14]. Moreover, levels of the main circulating form, 25(OH)D3, have been correlated to the onset and progression of many diseases [29,30]. Therefore, precise and accurate methods for analysis of 25(OH)D are essential to distinguish insufficient levels of the compound.
Vitamin D and its metabolites are demanding analytes to determine, because they are very lipophilic, at very low concentrations, and also have a high affinity for proteins that bind to vitamins [1]. There are several FDA-approved commercial 25(OH)D tests for routine clinical laboratory measuring of vitamin D status based on radioimmunoassay (RIA), enzyme immunoassay (EIA), chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), and competitive protein-binding assay (CPBA) techniques [6].

4.1. Immunoassay Techniques

A large number of immunoassay methods for measurement of the vitamin D forms exist. They differ in antibodies used and as a result some of them measure only one form, 25(OH)D2 or 25(OH)D3, while others measure total 25(OH)D levels [31]. Recently, a rapid immunoassay-based point-of-need diagnostic test for the assessment of 25(OH)D3 in finger-stick blood was developed. The assay was accompanied by a smartphone-assisted imaging device which allows for easy operation and access to the results [32]. Moreover, a chemiluminescent immunoassay method was developed for determination of the sum of 1,25(OH)2D2 and 1,25(OH)2D3. However, the obtained results exhibited significant deviation from the values determined by a reference HPLC-MS/MS method [33]. It was reported that immunoassay methods showed significant discrepancies in results, demonstrating positive bias, which results in overestimating vitamin D deficiency [34]. Moreover, Lee et al. [35] suggest that difference in cross-reactivities may be the main cause of discrepancy between immunoassays.

4.2. HPLC-MS/MS

Recently, HPLC-MS/MS has come to represent the gold standard for vitamin D plasma evaluation because it can discriminate between all forms and metabolites of vitamin D. Moreover, MS/MS detection allows the analysis of much lower concentrations of vitamin D and its metabolites than previously used HPLC-UV methods which enabled the determination of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 only. Recently, interest in the other forms and metabolites of vitamin D has arisen. The measurement of 25(OH)D using standard chromatographic methods may result in overestimated values because of the presence of the C-3 epimers, which may constitute up to 50% of the 25(OH)D content in adults [36,37]. Clinically, this issue is particularly important in estimating vitamin D status in infants where levels of the epimeric form may be higher than concentrations of 25(OH)D [38].
There are several HPLC-MS/MS methods for analysis of vitamin D in human serum, plasma, dry blood spots and milk [16,19,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Moreover, application of supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) with MS/MS detection was reported [13,53]. These methods allow the analysis of not only the main metabolite 25(OH)D but also substrates, D2 and D3, as well as other metabolites including epimers and dihydroxyl derivatives (Table 1). In the methods described, the chromatographic separation of vitamin D and its metabolites was usually performed on a C18 column. For more efficient separation of multiple isomeric compounds, a chiral column with cellulose selector was also used [16,53]. The mobile phases were composed of organic reagents such as methanol or acetonitrile with the addition of an aqueous solution of formic acid, ammonium formate, ammonium acetate or methylamine. For SFC, mixtures of CO2 with methanol and formic acid were used (Table 1).
In these methods, an effective release of 25(OH)D from the binding protein can be assured by a simple sample preparation procedure including protein precipitation or alkaline hydrolysis followed by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) with hexane or ethyl acetate or solid-phase extraction (SPE). In one case, immunoextraction was used to purify the sample [19]. The various extraction methods have enabled effective isolation of analytes from biological material, as evidenced by the recovery value in the range of 50–113% [48,49]. Some procedures required further derivatization with 4-(4′-dimethylaminophenyl)-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (DAPTAD) or 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoline- 3,5-dione were (PTAD) to improve sensitivity of the method in case of 1α,25(OH)2D3 [53] or to generate a stable product ion under MS ionization for 25(OH)D3 glucuronide [48]

5. Analysis of Vitamin D in Various Diseases

In the case of vitamin D deficiency in the body, it was proved that the parathyroid glands produce too much PTH, which then contributes to an increase in resorption in bone tissue metabolites, leading to a decrease in mineral density, which leads to a general feeling of tiredness and weakness, and as a consequence osteomalacia and osteoporosis [54]. Therefore, vitamin D deficiency may be associated with an increased risk of fracture [55].
Vitamin D deficiency very often occurs in patients with autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), lupus erythematosus, or a number of other rheumatological conditions [56]. Therefore, it seems that in these conditions measurements of vitamin D levels may be very important (Table 2). Serum concentrations of metabolites such as 3-epi-25(OH)D3 and synovial fluid metabolites, especially 1,25(OH)2D3, were found to be more closely related to the progression and course of RA [55]. Li et al. [57] reported that 3-epi-25(OH)D3 was significantly lower in serum of RA patients and in resolving reactive arthritis (ReA) patients relative to healthy controls. Moreover, the authors found differences in concentrations of various vitamin D metabolites between serum and synovial fluid [57]. In RA, active forms of vitamin D, in response to current inflammation, reduce the number of Th1 and Th17 lymphocytes and reduce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which are responsible for severe RA symptoms [58]. In another study [59], the effects of vitamin D supplementation in RA patients have contributed to improving patient health. Disease activity expressed by the mean disease activity index using C-reactive protein in these patients showed statistically significant improvement after supplementation (p = 0.002). Serum vitamin D levels increased from 10.05 ± 5.18 to 57.21 ± 24.77 ng/mL (p < 0.001) during treatment [59].
Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with autoimmune thyroid disease (Hashimoto’s, Graves’ disease) and non-inflammatory bowel disease. Serum 25(OH)D levels were significantly lower in patients with hypothyroidism compared to the control group (t = −11.11; p = 0.000). As a result of poor absorption caused by inflammation of the intestines, the deficiency of vitamin D is worsened due to impaired food absorption [60]. Another example of the effects of vitamin D deficiency is psoriasis—a chronic inflammatory disease that increases the risk of cardiovascular disease. A proportional relationship was demonstrated between 1,25(OH)2D and risk factors for cardiovascular disease, such as the volume of visceral adipose tissue (β = −0.43, p = 0.026 and β = −0.26 p = 0.13), uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in vessels (β = −0.19, p = 0.01) and coronary plaque load (β = −0.18, p = 0.03), regardless of traditional risk factors. It can be concluded that the level of 1,25(OH)2D helps to better capture the cardiometabolic risk associated with vitamin D deficiency [61].
Evidence suggests that insulin resistance syndrome (metabolic syndrome) and vitamin D deficiency contribute greatly to the formation of cancer [62]. High insulin levels may cause obesity, hypertension, low HDL cholesterol, high triglycerides, and diabetes [63]. It is interesting that vitamin D deficiency in the body contributes to the deepening of insulin resistance, resulting in metabolic disorders (hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia) [64].
The presence of a vitamin D receptor in endothelial cells, smooth blood vessels and cardiomyocytes and the presence of 1α-hydroxylase in the heart confirm the effect of this compound on the circulatory system. Regulation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA), and modulation of the inflammatory response and tissue calcification process are involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases, which include myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, or heart failure [65]. As a result of vitamin D deficiency, an increase in the concentration of parathyroid hormone is observed, which leads to the development of hypertension, endothelium dysfunction and calcification of the aortic valve. Calcitriol, by reducing the level of free radicals, has anti-inflammatory effects, thereby affecting the stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques [66].
Among the many positive properties of 1,25(OH)2D, the anti-cancer effect should also be taken into account. This compound works by inhibiting proliferation, activating apoptosis, stimulating differentiation, and inhibiting angiogenesis [67]. Studies have shown a directly proportional relationship between the incidence of given types of cancers and the concentration of vitamin D in serum and latitude. People with vitamin levels higher than 50 mmol/L had a lower risk of developing prostate and colorectal cancer by as much as 30–50% [12,68]. While a link exists between vitamin D levels of <30 nmol/L in the blood and increased incidence of colorectal cancer (31%), in the case of breast and prostate cancer no associations were found [69,70]. In the study of Manson et al., after one year of supplementation with 2000 IU of vitamin D, average levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D increased by 40%. However, vitamin D supplementation did not result in a lower incidence of invasive cancer [71].
Vitamin D deficiency has also been noted in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obesity, high triglycerides, diabetes and its complications, metabolic syndrome, and multiple sclerosis. For diabetes, measuring 1,25(OH)2D3 serum may help to predict the severity of diabetic retinopathy [72]. In people with metabolic syndrome, low vitamin D levels were more common in people with a higher BMI [73,74]. Low levels of 25(OH)D in the blood may contribute to a higher risk of developing multiple sclerosis in newborns. This risk of developing the disease was the highest at 25(OH)D levels <20.7 nmol/L, while at ≥48.9 nmol/L, risk was lowest [75].
Another inflammatory disease in which vitamin D pathogenesis can be important is bronchiolitis in infants. This may suggest a negative correlation between low concentrations of 25(OH)D and IgE in the serum of small patients [76]. Infants who suffered from food allergies were also diagnosed with vitamin D deficiencies that increased the likelihood of persistent allergies (especially in people with the GG genotype in vitamin D-binding protein). Antenatal supplementation has been shown to reduce the risk of food allergies in particular in infants with GT/TT genotype [77].
Low serum vitamin D levels may be associated with the onset of psychiatric disorders such as depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [78,79,80]. It was found that vitamin D is involved in the processes of maturation and differentiation of the cells of the nervous system, by affecting the synthesis of neural and glial cell lines of growth factors. It also controls the synthesis of the neurotransmitters acetylcholine (ACh), dopamine (DA) and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) [81]. Changed expression of the vitamin D receptor gene has been shown to be associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Vitamin D may have neuroprotective properties, protecting against the harmful effects of glutamate and reducing inflammation induced by the deposition of β-amyloid in the form of plaques [81]. Interesting conclusions are provided by the study of Jhee et al. [78] regarding the occurrence of depression in people with chronic kidney disease. It was noted that vitamin D deficiency was an important independent predictor of depression, and the incidence was significantly higher in patients with chronic kidney disease than in the general population (14.3 vs. 11.1%, p = 0.03). In addition, the study by Imai et al. [79] showed that stronger symptoms of depression occurred in those with the lowest levels of vitamin D. Due to vitamin D deficiency, anatomical changes in the hippocampus have been observed and serotonin levels and calcium levels in neurons have been reduced, which also predisposes to depression [82]. Insufficient skin synthesis of vitamin D in the autumn-winter period leads to a higher probability of the appearance of depressive states, which disappear in the summer [83]. Terock et al. [80] observed that deficient 25(OH)D levels were positively associated with post-traumatic stress disorders (OR = 2.02; p = 0.028). Additionally, in carriers of the CC-genotype of rs4588, significantly higher 25(OH)D levels were observed (p < 0.001) along with lower odds for the disease (OR = 0.35; p = 0.023) compared to the AA-genotype. Carriers of the TT-allele of rs7041 showed lower 25(OH)D levels (p < 0.001) and increased odds for the disease (OR = 2.80; p = 0.015) compared to the GG-genotype [80].
Vitamin D deficiency is a risk factor for acute respiratory infections (ARI). Meta-analysis by Martineau et al. [84] confirmed that vitamin D supplementation protects against ARI. Recently, several studies have started to clarify whether supplementation with vitamin D in different dosages has an influence on the course of the COVID-19 disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [85,86].

6. Factors Influencing Vitamin D Status in Human Body

Vitamin D regulates calcium and phosphorus metabolism [87]. The compound plays an antagonistic position against the parathyroid hormone and stimulates PTH secretion by inducing calcium removal from bones. The level of vitamin D, and more precisely its active metabolite 1α, 25(OH)2D3, is under the control of PTH and depends on the content of calcium and phosphorus in the body [17]. Epidemiological studies suggest that even mild vitamin D deficiency increases PTH levels and may worsen bone condition. An increase in the value of calcidiol in serum from 20 to 32 ng/mL (50–80 nmol/L) improves calcium transport efficiency in the intestine by 45–65% [88]. In addition, calcitriol is regulated by fibroblast growth factor (FGF-23) produced by bone tissue. High blood calcitriol levels induce expression of the enzyme D-24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1), which may transform calcitriol into the inactive compound calcitroic acid [89]. This is a feedback system that regulates the concentration of active vitamin metabolic agents and prevents the body from hypervitaminosis D [22]. The relationship between PTH and low vitamin D level may be an important determinant mainly in the case of older people. With a decrease in vitamin D levels, calcium and phosphorus absorption becomes suboptimal. PTH level and alkaline phosphatase activity rise [90]. In people with low levels of 25(OH)D, and increase in PTH concentration, ionized calcium level may also be higher. This suggests that in similar populations vitamin D levels <25 ng/mL can be recognized as a cut-off point for starting vitamin D supplementation [91]. Alvarez et al. confirmed that 25(OH)D blood concentrations are independently associated with plasma glutathione, thiol redox status systems and inflammatory markers [92]. The metabolism of vitamin D also depends on magnesium, which acts as a cofactor for 25-hydroxylase, 1α-hydroxylase, and 24-hydroxylase. Moreover, the activity of the vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) is magnesium dependent [93]. Therefore, a low level of this mineral may change the link between 25(OH)D in serum and PTH [94]. Vitamin D anti-inflammatory properties were manifested by inhibiting the kappa B (NFκB) nuclear pathway. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were positively associated with NFκB activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [95].
Vitamin D3 synthesis and its conversion into 25(OH)D3 depend on various socio-demographic and biochemical factors (Figure 2).
Among environmental factors, latitude, season, and residence significantly impact D3 skin synthesis. The status of vitamin D in the body also varies depending on ethnicity, gender, and age (Table 3).
The chances of vitamin D deficiency increase with age and lack of sun exposure. Vitamin D synthesis is most effective in the summer between 10 am and 3 pm in light-skinned people living below 40 degrees latitude [96]. In areas below the 34th parallel north, the amount of solar energy is large enough for vitamin D synthesis to occur throughout the whole year. Still, these regions’ inhabitants also have deficiencies, especially women living in the Middle East, who avoid the sun for religious reasons and cover the whole body, including the face [97,98].
There are several reports of the effect of residence on vitamin D levels. Griffin et al. [99], stated that different lifestyle led by rural residents, compared to urban residents, could be associated with a risk of vitamin D deficiency. The authors explained that rural dwellers are less exposed to sunshine because of changes in lifestyle as they now commute longer distances to work in the cities. Additionally, older rural dwellers may be less active due to geographic isolation and have less access to information on the benefits of good vitamin D health. It was shown that 25(OH)D levels in serum were significantly lower among rural residents in western Ireland, regardless of age. The deficiency of this vitamin was lower for women both in the city and in the countryside [99]. Moreover, Carpenter et al. [100] reported that concentrations of 25(OH)D depend on ethnicity, and are positively correlated with European ancestry (p < 0.001), and negatively correlated with African ancestry (p = 0.016).
Other natural factors that regulate vitamin D synthesis in the skin are skin pigmentation, sunscreen creams (SPF), and clothing. Large amounts of melanin in dark skin effectively block vitamin D synthesis. Melanin reduces the epidermis’ penetration by UVB, limiting the dermal synthesis of 25(OH)D [101]. Therefore, people of color require more prolonged exposure to the sun than Caucasians [102,103]. Sunscreen use with sun protection factor (SPF) 15 reduces cholecalciferol synthesis by up to 99% [104]. Most current health messages suggest several short sun exposure sessions in the summer to ensure sufficient vitamin D production. The guidelines indicate that 25% of the skin’s exposure for 15–30 min between 10 am and 3 pm, two or three times a week, may meet the demand for vitamin D in Caucasian people [96]. The evidence of Touvier et al. [105] also suggests that even low daily-life sun exposure behaviors contribute to increased vitamin D synthesis and improved 25(OH)D concentrations. Unfortunately, this does not apply to everyone. The amount that can be obtained in this way varies considerably from person to person and is influenced by several factors such as high BMI, race, ethnicity and genetic factors, namely polymorphisms in key genes of the vitamin D pathway, modulating vitamin D status [106]. However, during a study by Joh et al. [102], both sun exposure (≥20–30 min/day around noon) and 500 IU vitamin D3 supplementation significantly affected serum 25(OH)D levels compared to placebo. Supplementation alone, compared to UV exposure, caused a more significant increase in vitamin levels.
Deficiency of vitamin D is primarily a common health problem for the elderly. It is associated with decreased physical performance, and a higher risk of cognitive impairment, depression and anxiety. In people over 70, the amount of vitamin D precursor 7-dehydrocholesterol may be reduced by up to 60–75% [107]. Older people are vulnerable to many risk factors, such as reduced dietary intake, reduced exposure to sunlight (living in nursing homes), increased skin thickness, impaired intestinal absorption, and impaired hydroxylation process in liver and kidney. Older women had significantly lower levels of this vitamin [108]. However, Vitamin D deficiency occurs at all ages, mainly in children from 12 to 14 years old [109]. Numerous studies indicate a negative correlation of vitamin D concentration with parameters such as BMI, percentage of body fat, or WHR among children. It was proven that the rate of vitamin D deficiency in girls was higher than among boys. The level of this vitamin in the body could be influenced by adolescents’ behaviour and eating habits. It was shown that 25(OH)D levels correlated with obesity factors, mainly in boys. It is believed that girls have proportionally more subcutaneous fat, which poses a lower health risk than visceral and abdominal fat. Estrogens may also play a significant role in the metabolism of vitamin D in girls [109].
Obesity correlates with vitamin D deficiency through reduced bioavailability of this compound due to lower physical activity and lower sun exposure [110,111]. According to Monache et al., 25(OH)D concentration in serum correlated with BMI, regardless of season and age. Lower vitamin D values characterized women with obesity compared to women with healthy body weight and overweight in winter and summer [112,113]. Therefore, the developed guidelines recommend a twice-daily dose for obese people than the recommended dose for peers with appropriate body weight [114]. Low levels of vitamin D in the body may be caused by reduced bioavailability from the gastrointestinal tract due to impaired absorption or inability to use stored fat deposits in obese people. Another probable mechanism of decreased vitamin D concentration in this group is the increased synthesis of the active metabolite of vitamin D—1,25(OH)2D3 in the kidneys. This metabolite inhibits the production of 25(OH)D3 in the liver in a negative feedback mechanism [89].
Vitamin D deficiency correlates with diet. Cases of reduced vitamin D levels have been found in vegetarians, vegans, and macrobiotic nutritionists [115]. Interestingly, supplementation with high doses of vitamin D contributes to a change in the human intestinal microbiome. A decrease in the Bacteroidetes and Lactobacillus bacteria and an increase in Firmicutes and Bifidobacterium were observed [116].
Smoking may also be a predisposing factor for lowering vitamin D levels (<20 ng/mL). There is a hypothesis that smoking interferes with the conversion of 25(OH)D to 1,25(OH)2D, thus reducing calcium absorption in the gastrointestinal tract, leading to loss of bone mineral density, especially in men over 65 years of age [91,117].
Some medicines, e.g., antiepileptic drugs (phenytoin, phenobarbital), rifampicin, orlistat (used to treat obesity), cholestyramine, glucocorticosteroids, and immunosuppressants can reduce vitamin D levels [106].
DBP is a multifunctional protein in an ascetic fluid, plasma, the cerebrospinal fluid also found on the surface of numerous cells. It binds to the different forms of vitamin D including ergocalciferol, cholecalciferol, calcifediol, and active calcitriol [118]. Different physiological and pathological conditions can affect DBP levels, which in turn affect circulating concentrations of vitamin D forms. Carpenter et al. proved that 25(OH)D levels are positively correlated with circulating DBP (R = 0.25, p < 0.001) [100]. Moreover, a significant number of children (52.7%) with vitamin D deficiency had low DBP < 168 mg/L (p = 0.015) [119]. In pregnancy and liver diseases, the affinity of DBP for vitamin D metabolites may be decreased. It was reported that DBP level increases two-fold between the second and third trimesters while mean free 25(OH)D lowers and total 25(OH)D remains unchanged [120]. Liver diseases result in reductions in DBP. In patients with liver cirrhosis levels of free 25(OH)D were higher than in healthy subjects [121]. Therefore, alterations in DBP levels should be considered as potential confounders of the interpretation of plasma total 25(OH)D concentrations. Bikle and Schwartz [122] suggest that assessment of vitamin D status might be improved by measuring free 25(OH)D instead of, or in addition to, total 25(OH)D.
Gene mutations are important factors affecting the synthesis and metabolism of vitamin D. They include polymorphisms of CYP450 isoenzymes, protein transporters, and VDR. In the case of impaired catabolism of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D caused by mutations in the CYP24A1 gene encoding 24-hydroxylase, or the fact of excessive synthesis of 1,25(OH)2D resulting indirectly from the mutation in the SLC34A1 gene encoding the sodium co-transporter phosphate (NaPi-IIA) in the kidney, elevated calcitriol concentration is observed [123]. The risk of hypervitaminosis D in both cases is increased with the use of prophylactic doses of vitamin D. The polymorphism of the gene responsible for the metabolic pathway of vitamin D (GC gene-rs2282679) encodes DBP, which is responsible for regulating the transport of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D to tissues. Studies in various populations have shown a strong association between GC-sr2282679 and vitamin D status at lower 25(OH)D levels in people with the CC genotype, suggesting the effect of vitamin D on length telomeres. The fact that people with CC genotype had lower LTL (leukocyte telomere length) than people with AA genotype confirms the hypothesis regarding the long-term effect of vitamin D on telomere shortening [124]. However, in many bigger population studies, no relationship was found between 25(OH)D serum concentrations and LTL [125]. The VDR gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 12 (12q12-14) and has about 200 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The Bsm variant of the VDR gene was associated with hypertriglyceridemia and may be predisposed to metabolic syndrome (MetS). The VDR TaqI TT and BsmI BB + Bb genotypes were associated with lower 25(OH)D levels in the metabolic syndrome group [126]. Moreover, in obese patients with vitamin D deficiency, carriers of polymorphic alleles showed significant lower levels of serum 25(OH)D and higher HOMA-IR (the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; p = 0,04), blood pressure levels (p < 0.001) and lipid parameters compared to those with the wild type homozygotes (p = 0.02) [127]. Cdx2 polymorphism may be a potential biomarker in vitamin D treatment for breast cancer, irrespective of VDR receptor expression. The B allele or Bb VDR genotype presence may be a risk factor for breast cancer development [128].
Several studies proved that after supplementation with 25(OH)D3, vitamin D serum levels appeared to be genetically modified [118,129,130,131,132]. Carriers of the common AA genotype of rs4588 polymorphism better respond to vitamin D supplementation [118]. People carrying allele G of CYP2R1 had a higher vitamin D concentration after nine weeks of supplementation [131]. Moreover, CYP2R1 and CYP24A1 DNA methylation levels could potentially be biomarkers of variability in vitamin D responses. People with high levels of DNA methylation in two genes may need high vitamin D supplementation to achieve optimal 25(OH)D serum levels [132].

7. Conclusions

With the discovery of vitamin D-binding receptors in various cells and tissues, it was proved that vitamin D affects the proper functioning of many systems in the body including the immune system, the cardiovascular system, vision, the growth and division of cells and the formation of blood vessels. Numerous studies have confirmed the relationship of low concentrations of vitamin D and the occurrence of many diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic disorders, cancer and depression. Clinical interest in the physiological importance of vitamin D forms and their possible roles in pathophysiological processes requires an appropriate method for their measurement. It is increasingly apparent that laboratories using chromatographic based methods for 25(OH)D analysis, should separate the epimeric form of 25(OH)D3 in order to provide completer and more accurate 25(OH)D results. Therefore, identification of a rapid, simple, reliable, and cost-effective method for the determination of vitamin D status could help in monitoring disease progression and therapeutic strategies, improving quality of care. When analyzing vitamin D status, various socio-demographic, biochemical and genetic factors influencing vitamin D synthesis and metabolism should be taken into account.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.-Ł.; literature review, M.K., A.K.G., G.K., M.K.-Ł.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K., A.K.G., G.K., M.K.-Ł.; writing—review and editing, M.K., A.K.G., G.K., M.K.-Ł.; visualization, M.K.-Ł.; supervision, M.K.-Ł. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Authors would like to thank Poznan University of Medical Sciences for financial support of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Demer, L.L.; Hsu, J.J.; Tintut, Y. Steroid hormone vitamin D: Implications for cardiovascular disease. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 1576–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bikle, D.D. Vitamin D metabolism, mechanism of action, and clinical applications. Chem. Biol. 2014, 21, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Gil, Á.; Plaza-Diaz, J.; Mesa, M.D. Vitamin D: Classic and novel actions. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2018, 72, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Christakos, S.; Dhawan, P.; Verstuyf, A.; Verlinden, L.; Carmeliet, G. Vitamin D: Metabolism, molecular mechanism of action, and pleiotropic effects. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 365–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kennel, K.A.; Drake, M.T.; Hurley, D.L. Vitamin D deficiency in adults: When to test and how to treat. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2010, 85, 752–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Arneson, W.L.; Arneson, D.L. Current methods for routine clinical laboratory testing of vitamin D levels. Lab. Med. 2013, 44, e38–e42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shah, I.; James, R.; Barker, J.; Petroczi, A.; Naughton, D.P. Misleading measures in Vitamin D analysis: A novel LC-MS/MS assay to account for epimers and isobars. Nutr. J. 2011, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Tsiaras, W.; Weinstock, M. Factors Influencing Vitamin D Status. Acta Derm. Venerol. 2011, 91, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bahrami, A.; Sadeghnia, H.R.; Tabatabaeizadeh, S.-A.; Bahrami-Taghanaki, H.; Behboodi, N.; Esmaeili, H.; Ferns, G.A.; Mobarhan, M.G.; Avan, A. Genetic and epigenetic factors influencing vitamin D status. J. Cell Physiol. 2018, 233, 4033–4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, T.C.; Chimeh, F.; Lu, Z.; Mathieu, J.; Person, K.S.; Zhang, A.; Kohn, N.; Martinello, S.; Berkowitz, R.; Holick, M.F. Factors that influence the cutaneous synthesis and dietary sources of vitamin D. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2007, 460, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lamberg-Allardt, C. Vitamin D in foods and as supplements. Progress Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2006, 92, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Holick, M.F. Sunlight and vitamin D for bone health and prevention of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 80, 1678S–1688S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Jumaah, F.; Larsson, S.; Essén, S.; Cunico, L.P.; Holm, C.; Turner, C.; Sandahl, M. A rapid method for the separation of vitamin D and its metabolites by ultra-high performance supercritical fluid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1440, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cashman, K.D.; van den Heuvel, E.G.; Schoemaker, R.J.; Prévéraud, D.P.; Macdonald, H.M.; Arcot, J. 25-hydroxyvitamin D as a biomarker of vitamin D status and its modeling to inform strategies for prevention of vitamin D deficiency within the population. Adv. Nutr. 2017, 8, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; p. 13050. ISBN 978-0-309-16394-1.
  16. Jenkinson, C.; Taylor, A.E.; Hassan-Smith, Z.K.; Adams, J.S.; Stewart, P.M.; Hewison, M.; Keevil, B.G. High throughput LC–MS/MS method for the simultaneous analysis of multiple vitamin D analytes in serum. J. Chromatogr. B 2016, 1014, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ferrone, F.; Pepe, J.; Danese, V.C.; Fassino, V.; Cecchetti, V.; De Lucia, F.; Biamonte, F.; Colangelo, L.; Ferrazza, G.; Panzini, E.; et al. The relative influence of serum ionized calcium and 25-hydroxyvitamin D in regulating PTH secretion in healthy subjects. Bone 2019, 125, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Heaney, R.P.; Recker, R.R.; Grote, J.; Horst, R.L.; Armas, L.A.G. Vitamin D3 is more potent than vitamin D2 in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, E447–E452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Dirks, N.F.; Martens, F.; Vanderschueren, D.; Billen, J.; Pauwels, S.; Ackermans, M.T.; Endert, E.; den Heijer, M.; Blankenstein, M.A.; Heijboer, A.C. Determination of human reference values for serum total 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D using an extensively validated 2D ID-UPLC–MS/MS method. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 164, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. St-Arnaud, R.; Naja, R.P. Vitamin D metabolism, cartilage and bone fracture repair. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2011, 347, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bosworth, C.R.; Levin, G.; Robinson-Cohen, C.; Hoofnagle, A.N.; Ruzinski, J.; Young, B.; Schwartz, S.M.; Himmelfarb, J.; Kestenbaum, B.; de Boer, I.H. The serum 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentration, a marker of vitamin D catabolism, is reduced in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2012, 82, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Schlingmann, K.P.; Kaufmann, M.; Weber, S.; Irwin, A.; Goos, C.; John, U.; Misselwitz, J.; Klaus, G.; Kuwertz-Bröking, E.; Fehrenbach, H.; et al. Mutations in CYP24A1 and idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Al-Zohily, B.; Al-Menhali, A.; Gariballa, S.; Haq, A.; Shah, I. Epimers of vitamin D: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Zbytek, B.; Janjetovic, Z.; Tuckey, R.C.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Sweatman, T.W.; Jones, E.; Nguyen, M.N.; Slominski, A.T. 20-Hydroxyvitamin D3, a product of vitamin D3 hydroxylation by cytochrome P450scc, stimulates keratinocyte differentiation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 2271–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Slominski, A.T.; Kim, T.-K.; Janjetovic, Z.; Tuckey, R.C.; Bieniek, R.; Yue, J.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Nguyen, M.N.; Tang, E.K.Y.; et al. 20-Hydroxyvitamin D2 is a noncalcemic analog of vitamin D with potent antiproliferative and prodifferentiation activities in normal and malignant cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2011, 300, C526–C541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Chakraborti, C. Vitamin D as a promising anticancer agent. Ind. J Pharmacol. 2011, 43, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Sassi, F.; Tamone, C.; D’Amelio, P. Vitamin D: Nutrient, Hormone, and Immunomodulator. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D Status: Measurement, Interpretation, and Clinical Application. Ann. Epidemiol. 2009, 19, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Skender, S.; Böhm, J.; Schrotz-King, P.; Chang-Claude, J.; Siegel, E.M.; Steindorf, K.; Owen, R.W.; Ose, J.; Hoffmeister, M.; Brenner, H.; et al. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels in colorectal cancer patients and associations with physical activity. Nutr. Cancer 2017, 69, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zoppini, G.; Galletti, A.; Targher, G.; Brangani, C.; Pichiri, I.; Trombetta, M.; Negri, C.; De Santi, F.; Stoico, V.; Cacciatori, V.; et al. Lower levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 are associated with a higher prevalence of microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diab. Res. Care 2015, 3, e000058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lippi, G.; Salvagno, G.L.; Fortunato, A.; Dipalo, M.; Aloe, R.; Rin, G.D.; Giavarina, D. Multicenter Comparison of Seven 25Oh Vitamin D Automated Immunoassays/Multicentrično Poređenje Sedam Automatizovanih Imunoeseja Za 25Oh Vitamin D. J. Med. Biochem. 2015, 34, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Vemulapati, S.; Rey, E.; O’Dell, D.; Mehta, S.; Erickson, D. A quantitative point-of-need assay for the assessment of vitamin D3 deficiency. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zittermann, A.; Ernst, J.B.; Becker, T.; Dreier, J.; Knabbe, C.; Gummert, J.F.; Kuhn, J. Measurement of circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D: Comparison of an automated method with a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. Int. J. Analyt. Chem. 2016, 2016, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Hollis, B.W. Comparison of Commercially Available 125I-based RIA Methods for the Determination of Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D. Clin. Chem. 2000, 46, 1657–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, J.H.; Choi, J.-H.; Kweon, O.J.; Park, A.J. Discrepancy between Vitamin D Total Immunoassays due to various cross-reactivities. J. Bone Metab. 2015, 22, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Abouzid, M.; Karaźniewicz-Łada, M.; Pawlak, K.; Burchardt, P.; Kruszyna, Ł.; Główka, F. Measurement of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D2, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in population of patients with cardiovascular disease by UPLC-MS/MS method. J. Chromatogr. B 2020, 122350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lensmeyer, G.; Poquette, M.; Wiebe, D.; Binkley, N. The C-3 Epimer of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D 3 Is Present in Adult Serum. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bailey, D.; Veljkovic, K.; Yazdanpanah, M.; Adeli, K. Analytical measurement and clinical relevance of vitamin D3 C3-epimer. Clin. Biochem. 2013, 46, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Narayanaswamy, R.; Iyer, V.; Khare, P.; Bodziak, M.L.; Badgett, D.; Zivadinov, R.; Weinstock-Guttman, B.; Rideout, T.C.; Ramanathan, M.; Browne, R.W. Simultaneous determination of oxysterols, cholesterol and 25-hydroxy-vitamin D3 in human plasma by LC-UV-MS. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Newman, M.S.; Brandon, T.R.; Groves, M.N.; Gregory, W.L.; Kapur, S.; Zava, D.T. A liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for determination of 25-hydroxy vitamin D2 and 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 in dried blood spots: A potential adjunct to diabetes and cardiometabolic risk screening. J. Diabet. Sci. Technol. 2009, 3, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wang, S.; Wang, S.; Yang, R.; Zhou, W.; Li, H.; Dong, J.; Chen, W. A simple and precise LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and D2 without interference from the C3 epimer. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 5254–5261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Müller, M.J.; Stokes, C.S.; Volmer, D.A. Quantification of the 3α and 3β epimers of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in dried blood spots by LC-MS/MS using artificial whole blood calibration and chemical derivatization. Talanta 2017, 165, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Teegarden, M.D.; Riedl, K.M.; Schwartz, S.J. Chromatographic separation of PTAD-derivatized 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and its C-3 epimer from human serum and murine skin. J. Chromatogr. B 2015, 991, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Albarhani, A.A.; Collier, F.; Greaves, R.F.; Ponsonby, A.-L.; Allen, K.J.; Vuillermin, P.J.; Roche, P.; Clarke, M.W. Vitamins D and A can be successfully measured by LC–MS/MS in cord blood diluted plasma. Clin. Biochem. 2015, 48, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kmieć, P.; Minkiewicz, I.; Rola, R.; Sworczak, K.; Żmijewski, M.A.; Kowalski, K. Vitamin D status including 3-epi-25(OH)D3 among adult patients with thyroid disorders during summer months. Endokrynol. Pol. 2018, 69, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Dowling, K.G.; Hull, G.; Sundvall, J.; Lamberg-Allardt, C.; Cashman, K.D. Improved accuracy of an tandem liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method measuring 24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D metabolites in serum using unspiked controls and its application to determining cross-reactivity of a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1497, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gomes, F.P.; Shaw, P.N.; Hewavitharana, A.K. Determination of four sulfated vitamin D compounds in human biological fluids by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2016, 1009–1010, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Gao, C.; Bergagnini-Kolev, M.C.; Liao, M.Z.; Wang, Z.; Wong, T.; Calamia, J.C.; Lin, Y.S.; Mao, Q.; Thummel, K.E. Simultaneous quantification of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-3-sulfate and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-3-glucuronide in human serum and plasma using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry coupled with DAPTAD-derivatization. J. Chromatogr. B 2017, 1060, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Z.; Senn, T.; Kalhorn, T.; Zheng, X.E.; Zheng, S.; Davis, C.L.; Hebert, M.F.; Lin, Y.S.; Thummel, K.E. Simultaneous measurement of plasma vitamin D3 metabolites, including 4β,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Analyt. Biochem. 2011, 418, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Fabregat-Cabello, N.; Farre-Segura, J.; Huyghebaert, L.; Peeters, S.; Le Goff, C.; Souberbielle, J.-C.; Cavalier, É. A fast and simple method for simultaneous measurements of 25(OH)D, 24,25(OH) 2 D and the Vitamin D Metabolite Ratio (VMR) in serum samples by LC-MS/MS. Clin. Chim. Acta 2017, 473, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tang, J.C.Y.; Nicholls, H.; Piec, I.; Washbourne, C.J.; Dutton, J.J.; Jackson, S.; Greeves, J.; Fraser, W.D. Reference intervals for serum 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and the ratio with 25-hydroxyvitamin D established using a newly developed LC–MS/MS method. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017, 46, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mena-Bravo, A.; Priego-Capote, F.; Luque de Castro, M.D. Two-dimensional liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry for vitamin D metabolite profiling including the C3-epimer-25-monohydroxyvitamin D3. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1451, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jenkinson, C.; Taylor, A.; Storbeck, K.-H.; Hewison, M. Analysis of multiple vitamin D metabolites by ultra-performance supercritical fluid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPSFC-MS/MS). J. Chromatogr. B 2018, 1087–1088, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Elbossaty, W.F. Mineralization of bones in osteoporosis and osteomalacia. Ann. Clin. Lab. Res. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhu, K.; Lewis, J.R.; Sim, M.; Prince, R.L. Low vitamin D status is associated with impaired bone quality and increased risk of fracture-related hospitalization in older australian women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2019, 34, 2019–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pelajo, C.F.; Lopez-Benitez, J.M.; Miller, L.C. Vitamin D and autoimmune rheumatologic disorders. Autoimmun. Rev. 2010, 9, 507–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, D.; Jeffery, L.E.; Jenkinson, C.; Harrison, S.R.; Chun, R.F.; Adams, J.S.; Raza, K.; Hewison, M. Serum and synovial fluid vitamin D metabolites and rheumatoid arthritis. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 187, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Harrison, S.R.; Li, D.; Jeffery, L.E.; Raza, K.; Hewison, M. Vitamin D, autoimmune disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2020, 106, 58–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Chandrashekara, S.; Patted, A. Role of vitamin D supplementation in improving disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: An exploratory study. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 20, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mackawy, A.M.H.; Al-Ayed, B.M.; Al-Rashidi, B.M. Vitamin D deficiency and its association with thyroid disease. IJHS 2013, 7, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Playford, M.P.; Dey, A.K.; Zierold, C.; Joshi, A.A.; Blocki, F.; Bonelli, F.; Rodante, J.A.; Harrington, C.L.; Rivers, J.P.; Elnabawi, Y.A.; et al. Serum active 1,25(OH)2D, but not inactive 25(OH)D vitamin D levels are associated with cardiometabolic and cardiovascular disease risk in psoriasis. Atherosclerosis 2019, 289, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Szymczak-Pajor, I.; Śliwińska, A. Analysis of association between vitamin D deficiency and insulin resistance. Nutrients 2019, 11, 794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Ormazabal, V.; Nair, S.; Elfeky, O.; Aguayo, C.; Salomon, C.; Zuñiga, F.A. Association between insulin resistance and the development of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2018, 17, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wenclewska, S.; Szymczak-Pajor, I.; Drzewoski, J.; Bunk, M.; Śliwińska, A. Vitamin D supplementation reduces both oxidative DNA damage and insulin resistance in the elderly with metabolic disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Mozos, I.; Marginean, O. Links between Vitamin D deficiency and cardiovascular diseases. BioMed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, J.; Zhou, J.; Robertson, G.; Lee, V. Vitamin D in Vascular Calcification: A Double-Edged Sword? Nutrients 2018, 10, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Maj, E.; Filip-Psurska, B.; Milczarek, M.; Psurski, M.; Kutner, A.; Wietrzyk, J. Vitamin D derivatives potentiate the anticancer and anti-angiogenic activity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in combination with cytostatic drugs in an A549 non-small cell lung cancer model. Int. J. Oncol. 2017, 52, 337–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhang, R.; Naughton, D.P. Vitamin D in health and disease: Current perspectives. Nutr. J. 2010, 9, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Jiang, X.; Dimou, N.L.; Al-Dabhani, K.; Lewis, S.J.; Martin, R.M.; Haycock, P.C.; Gunter, M.J.; Key, T.J.; Eeles, R.A.; Muir, K.; et al. Circulating vitamin D concentrations and risk of breast and prostate cancer: A Mendelian randomization study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 48, 1416–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. McCullough, M.L.; Zoltick, E.S.; Weinstein, S.J.; Fedirko, V.; Wang, M.; Cook, N.R.; Eliassen, A.H.; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A.; Agnoli, C.; Albanes, D.; et al. Circulating vitamin D and colorectal cancer risk: An international pooling project of 17 cohorts. JNCI J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 2019, 111, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Manson, J.E.; Cook, N.R.; Lee, I.-M.; Christen, W.; Bassuk, S.S.; Mora, S.; Gibson, H.; Gordon, D.; Copeland, T.; D’Agostino, D.; et al. Vitamin D supplements and prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Aksoy, H.; Akçay, F.; Kurtul, N.; Baykal, O.; Avci, B. Serum 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3), 25 hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) and parathormone levels in diabetic retinopathy. Clin. Biochem. 2000, 33, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jolliffe, D.A.; James, W.Y.; Hooper, R.L.; Barnes, N.C.; Greiller, C.L.; Islam, K.; Bhowmik, A.; Timms, P.M.; Rajakulasingam, R.K.; Choudhury, A.B.; et al. Prevalence, determinants and clinical correlates of vitamin D deficiency in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in London, UK. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 175, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Fu, J.; Han, L.; Zhao, Y.; Li, G.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Gao, S.; Willi, S.M. Vitamin D levels are associated with metabolic syndrome in adolescents and young adults: The BCAMS study. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 2161–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Nielsen, N.M.; Munger, K.L.; Koch-Henriksen, N.; Hougaard, D.M.; Magyari, M.; Jorgensen, K.T.; Lundqvist, M.; Simonsen, J.; Jess, T.; Cohen, A.; et al. Neonatal vitamin D status and risk of multiple sclerosis: A population-based case-control study. Neurology 2017, 88, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Hassanein, B.E.D.M.; Soliman, D.R.; Fayed, S.M.A.E.; Suleiman, M.M.M. Serum levels of 25(OH) vitamin D and immunoglobulin E in infants with bronchiolitis. Egypt. Pediatr. Assoc. Gaz. 2016, 64, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Koplin, J.J.; Suaini, N.H.A.; Vuillermin, P.; Ellis, J.A.; Panjari, M.; Ponsonby, A.-L.; Peters, R.L.; Matheson, M.C.; Martino, D.; Dang, T.; et al. Polymorphisms affecting vitamin D–binding protein modify the relationship between serum vitamin D (25[OH]D3) and food allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Jhee, J.H.; Kim, H.; Park, S.; Yun, H.-R.; Jung, S.-Y.; Kee, Y.K.; Yoon, C.-Y.; Park, J.T.; Han, S.H.; Kang, S.-W.; et al. Vitamin D deficiency is significantly associated with depression in patients with chronic kidney disease. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Imai, C.M.; Halldorsson, T.I.; Eiriksdottir, G.; Cotch, M.F.; Steingrimsdottir, L.; Thorsdottir, I.; Launer, L.J.; Harris, T.; Gudnason, V.; Gunnarsdottir, I. Depression and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in older adults living at northern latitudes–AGES-Reykjavik study. J. Nutr. Sci. 2015, 4, e37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Terock, J.; Hannemann, A.; Van der Auwera, S.; Janowitz, D.; Spitzer, C.; Bonk, S.; Völzke, H.; Grabe, H.J. Posttraumatic stress disorder is associated with reduced vitamin D levels and functional polymorphisms of the vitamin D binding-protein in a population-based sample. Progress Neuro Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatr. 2020, 96, 109760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Moretti, R.; Morelli, M.E.; Caruso, P. Vitamin D in neurological diseases: A rationale for a pathogenic impact. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Yavuz, Y.C.; Biyik, Z.; Ozkul, D.; Abusoglu, S.; Eryavuz, D.; Dag, M.; Korez, M.K.; Guney, I.; Altintepe, L. Association of depressive symptoms with 25(OH) vitamin D in hemodialysis patients and effect of gender. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2020, 24, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Parker, G.B.; Brotchie, H.; Graham, R.K. Vitamin D and depression. J. Affect. Dis. 2017, 208, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Martineau, A.R.; Jolliffe, D.A.; Hooper, R.L.; Greenberg, L.; Aloia, J.F.; Bergman, P.; Dubnov-Raz, G.; Esposito, S.; Ganmaa, D.; Ginde, A.A.; et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ 2017, 356, i6583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Arboleda, J.F.; Urcuqui-Inchima, S. Vitamin D supplementation: A potential approach for Coronavirus/COVID-19 therapeutics? Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Grant, W.B.; Lahore, H.; McDonnell, S.L.; Baggerly, C.A.; French, C.B.; Aliano, J.L.; Bhattoa, H.P. Evidence that vitamin D supplementation could reduce risk of influenza and COVID-19 infections and deaths. Nutrients 2020, 12, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Fukumoto, S. Phosphate metabolism and vitamin D. BoneKEy Rep. 2014, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Heaney, R.P.; Davies, K.M.; Chen, T.C.; Holick, M.F.; Barger-Lux, M.J. Human serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol response to extended oral dosing with cholecalciferol. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 77, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Bueno, A.L.; Czepielewski, M.A.; Raimundo, F.V. Calcium and vitamin D intake and biochemical tests in short-stature children and adolescents. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 64, 1296–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Hernando, V.-U.; Andry, M.-M.; María Virginia, P.-F.; Valentina, A. Vitamin D nutritional status in the adult population in Colombia—An analytical cross-sectional study. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Alvarez, J.A.; Chowdhury, R.; Jones, D.P.; Martin, G.S.; Brigham, K.L.; Binongo, J.N.; Ziegler, T.R.; Tangpricha, V. Vitamin D status is independently associated with plasma glutathione and cysteine thiol/disulphide redox status in adults. Clin. Endocrinol. 2014, 81, 458–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Rosanoff, A.; Dai, Q.; Shapses, S.A. Essential nutrient interactions: Does low or suboptimal magnesium status interact with vitamin D and/or calcium status? Adv. Nutr. 2016, 7, 25–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Cheung, M.M.; DeLuccia, R.; Ramadoss, R.K.; Aljahdali, A.; Volpe, S.L.; Shewokis, P.A.; Sukumar, D. Low dietary magnesium intake alters vitamin D—parathyroid hormone relationship in adults who are overweight or obese. Nutr. Res. 2019, 69, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Mousa, A.; de Courten, M.P.J.; Forbes, J.; de Courten, B. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with nuclear factor kappa-B activity but not with inflammatory markers in healthy normoglycemic adults. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 177, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wacker, M.; Holick, M.F. Sunlight and Vitamin D: A global perspective for health. Derm. Endocrinol. 2013, 5, 51–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Matsuoka, L.Y.; Wortsman, J.; Dannenberg, M.J.; Hollis, B.W.; Lu, Z.; Holick, M.F. Clothing prevents ultraviolet-B radiation-dependent photosynthesis of vitamin D3. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1992, 75, 1099–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chakhtoura, M.; Rahme, M.; Chamoun, N.; El-Hajj Fuleihan, G. Vitamin D in the middle east and north Africa. Bone Rep. 2018, 8, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Griffin, T.P.; Wall, D.; Blake, L.; Griffin, D.G.; Robinson, S.; Bell, M.; Mulkerrin, E.C.; O’Shea, P.M. Higher risk of vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency for rural than urban dwellers. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 197, 105547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Carpenter, T.O.; Zhang, J.H.; Parra, E.; Ellis, B.K.; Simpson, C.; Lee, W.M.; Balko, J.; Fu, L.; Wong, B.Y.-L.; Cole, D.E. Vitamin D binding protein is a key determinant of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in infants and toddlers. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013, 28, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bikle, D. Nonclassic Actions of Vitamin D. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Joh, H.-K.; Hwang, S.; Cho, B.; Lim, C.S.; Jung, S.-E. Effect of sun exposure versus oral vitamin D supplementation on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in young adults: A randomized clinical trial. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Dimakopoulos, I.; Magriplis, E.; Mitsopoulou, A.-V.; Karageorgou, D.; Bakogianni, I.; Micha, R.; Michas, G.; Chourdakis, M.; Ntouroupi, T.; Tsaniklidou, S.-M.; et al. Association of serum vitamin D status with dietary intake and sun exposure in adults. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2019, 34, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Matsuoka, L.Y.; Wortsman, J.; Haddad, J.G.; Hollis, B.W. In vivo threshold for cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D3. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1989, 114, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Touvier, M.; Deschasaux, M.; Montourcy, M.; Sutton, A.; Charnaux, N.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Assmann, K.E.; Fezeu, L.; Latino-Martel, P.; Druesne-Pecollo, N.; et al. Determinants of vitamin D status in caucasian adults: Influence of Sun exposure, dietary intake, sociodemographic, lifestyle, anthropometric, and genetic factors. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Holick, M.F. The vitamin D deficiency pandemic and consequences for nonskeletal health: Mechanisms of action. Mol. Asp. Med. 2008, 29, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Mateo-Pascual, C.; Julián-Viñals, R.; Alarcón-Alarcón, T.; Castell-Alcalá, M.V.; Iturzaeta-Sánchez, J.M.; Otero-Piume, A. Déficit de vitamina D en una cohorte de mayores de 65 años: Prevalencia y asociación con factores sociodemográficos y de salud. Rev. Esp. Geriatr. Gerontol. 2014, 49, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Azzam, E.; Elsabbagh, N.; Elgayar, N.; Younan, D. Relation between vitamin D and geriatric syndrome. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2020, 35, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Li, H.; Huang, T.; Xiao, P.; Zhao, X.; Liu, J.; Cheng, H.; Dong, H.; Morris, H.A.; Mi, J. Widespread vitamin D deficiency and its sex-specific association with adiposity in Chinese children and adolescents. Nutrition 2020, 71, 110646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Shantavasinkul, P.C.; Phanachet, P.; Puchaiwattananon, O.; Chailurkit, L.; Lepananon, T.; Chanprasertyotin, S.; Ongphiphadhanakul, B.; Warodomwichit, D. Vitamin D status is a determinant of skeletal muscle mass in obesity according to body fat percentage. Nutrition 2015, 31, 801–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. González, L.; Ramos-Trautmann, G.; Díaz-Luquis, G.M.; Pérez, C.M.; Palacios, C. Vitamin D status is inversely associated with obesity in a clinic-based sample in Puerto Rico. Nutr. Res. 2015, 35, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Delle Monache, S.; Di Fulvio, P.; Iannetti, E.; Valerii, L.; Capone, L.; Nespoli, M.G.; Bologna, M.; Angelucci, A. Body mass index represents a good predictor of vitamin D status in women independently from age. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 829–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Moreira, J.S.R.; de Paula, T.P.; Sperb, L.F.; Miller, M.E.P.; Azevedo, M.J.; Viana, L.V. Association of plasma vitamin D status with lifestyle patterns and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Diabet. Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 139, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Płudowski, P.; Karczmarewicz, E.; Bayer, M.; Carter, G.; Chlebna-Sokół, D.; Czech-Kowalska, J.; Dębski, R.; Decsi, T.; Dobrzańska, A.; Franek, E.; et al. Practical guidelines for the supplementation of vitamin D and the treatment of deficits in Central Europe-recommended vitamin D intakes in the general population and groups at risk of vitamin D deficiency. Endokrynol. Pol. 2013, 64, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Alpert, P.T.; Shaikh, U. The Effects of Vitamin D Deficiency and Insufficiency on the Endocrine and Paracrine Systems. Biol. Res. Nurs. 2007, 9, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Tabatabaeizadeh, S.-A.; Fazeli, M.; Meshkat, Z.; Khodashenas, E.; Esmaeili, H.; Mazloum, S.; Ferns, G.A.; Abdizadeh, M.F.; Ghayour-Mobarhan, M. The effects of high doses of vitamin D on the composition of the gut microbiome of adolescent girls. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2020, 35, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. McCarroll, K.; Beirne, A.; Casey, M.; McNulty, H.; Ward, M.; Hoey, L.; Molloy, A.; Laird, E.; Healy, M.; Strain, J.J.; et al. Determinants of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in older Irish adults. Age Ageing 2015, 44, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Mehramiz, M.; Khayyatzadeh, S.S.; Esmaily, H.; Ghasemi, F.; Sadeghi-Ardekani, K.; Tayefi, M.; Mirmousavi, S.J.; Hanachi, P.; Bahrami-Taghanaki, H.; Eslami, S.; et al. Associations of vitamin D binding protein variants with the vitamin D-induced increase in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2019, 29, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Surve, S.; Begum, S.; Joshi, B.; Khatkhatay, M.I.; Kadam, S.; Chauhan, S. Significance of vitamin D binding protein in assessing vitamin D status among under-five children. Ind. J. Clin. Biochem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Tsuprykov, O.; Buse, C.; Skoblo, R.; Haq, A.; Hocher, B. Reference intervals for measured and calculated free 25-hydroxyvitamin D in normal pregnancy. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 181, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Schwartz, J.B.; Gallagher, J.C.; Jorde, R.; Berg, V.; Walsh, J.; Eastell, R.; Evans, A.L.; Bowles, S.; Naylor, K.E.; Jones, K.S.; et al. Determination of Free 25(OH)D concentrations and their relationships to total 25(OH)D in multiple clinical populations. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 3278–3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Bikle, D.D.; Schwartz, J. Vitamin D binding protein, total and free vitamin D levels in different physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Pronicka, E.; Ciara, E.; Halat, P.; Janiec, A.; Wójcik, M.; Rowińska, E.; Rokicki, D.; Płudowski, P.; Wojciechowska, E.; Wierzbicka, A.; et al. Biallelic mutations in CYP24A1 or SLC34A1 as a cause of infantile idiopathic hypercalcemia (IIH) with vitamin D hypersensitivity: Molecular study of 11 historical IIH cases. J. Appl. Genet. 2017, 58, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Normando, P.; Santos-Rebouças, C.; Leung, C.; Epel, E.; da Fonseca, A.C.; Zembrzuski, V.; Faerstein, E.; Bezerra, F.F. Variants in gene encoding for vitamin D binding protein were associated with leukocyte telomere length: The Pró-Saúde study. Nutrition 2020, 71, 110618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ahn, J.; Yu, K.; Stolzenberg-Solomon, R.; Simon, K.C.; McCullough, M.L.; Gallicchio, L.; Jacobs, E.J.; Ascherio, A.; Helzlsouer, K.; Jacobs, K.B.; et al. Genome-wide association study of circulating vitamin D levels. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 2739–2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Sangkaew, B.; Nuinoon, M.; Jeenduang, N. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with serum 25(OH)D levels and metabolic syndrome in Thai population. Gene 2018, 659, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zaki, M.; Kamal, S.; Basha, W.A.; Youness, E.; Ezzat, W.; El-Bassyouni, H.; Amr, K. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism (VDR) with vitamin D deficiency, metabolic and inflammatory markers in Egyptian obese women. Genes Dis. 2017, 4, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Elzehery, R.R.; Baiomy, A.A.; Hegazy, M.A.-F.; Fares, R.; El-Gilany, A.-H.; Hegazi, R. Vitamin D status, receptor gene BsmI (A/G) polymorphism and breast cancer in a group of Egyptian females. Egypt. J. Med. Hum. Genet. 2017, 18, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. De Medeiros Cavalcante, I.G.; Silva, A.S.; Calvalho Costa, M.J.; Persuhn, D.C.; Ibrahim Issa, C.T.M.; de Luna Freire, T.L.; Rodrigues Gonçalves, M.C. Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation and influence of BsmI polymorphism of the VDR gene of the inflammatory profile and oxidative stress in elderly women with vitamin D insufficiency. Exp. Gerontol. 2015, 66, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Thacher, T.D.; Levine, M.A. CYP2R1 mutations causing vitamin D-deficiency rickets. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 173, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bahrami, A.; Mehramiz, M.; Ghayour-Mobarhan, M.; Bahrami-Taghanaki, H.; Sadeghi Ardekani, K.; Tayefi, M.; Sadeghzade, M.; Rashidmayvan, M.; Safari Ghalezou, M.; Ferns, G.A.; et al. A genetic variant in the cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily R member 1 determines response to vitamin D supplementation. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Zhou, Y.; Zhao, L.-J.; Xu, X.; Ye, A.; Travers-Gustafson, D.; Zhou, B.; Wang, H.-W.; Zhang, W.; Lee Hamm, L.; Deng, H.-W.; et al. DNA methylation levels of CYP2R1 and CYP24A1 predict vitamin D response variation. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 144, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Nutrients 12 02788 g001 550
Figure 1. Metabolism of vitamin D.
Figure 1. Metabolism of vitamin D.
Nutrients 12 02788 g001
Nutrients 12 02788 g002 550
Figure 2. Determinants of vitamin D status in the human body.
Figure 2. Determinants of vitamin D status in the human body.
Nutrients 12 02788 g002
Table
Table 1. Recent liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods for analysis of forms and metabolites of vitamin D.
Table 1. Recent liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods for analysis of forms and metabolites of vitamin D.
Analyzed CompoundsMatrixMethodSample PreparationChromatographic ConditionsLOQ (ng/mL)Ref.
25(OH)D3,
25(OH)D2		PlasmaLC-MS/MSalkaline hydrolysis of lipid esters followed by SPEColumn: Supelcosil LC-18-S (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm)
Mobile phase: 0.1% formic acid in methanol, 0.1% formic acid in methanol/water (50:50, v/v), gradient elution.		25(OH)D3: 3.2
25-OH-D2: 3.4		[39]
25(OH)D2,
25(OH)D3		Dried blood spots serumLC-MS/MSprotein precipitation with methanol, LLE with hexaneColumn: Varian Pursuit 3u PFP (50 × 2.0 mm, 3 µm).
Mobile phase: 0.1% formic acid and 2 mM ammonium acetate, isocratic elution.		n.a.[40]
25(OH)D2,
25(OH)D3		SerumLC-MS/MSProtein precipitation with methanol and ZnSO4Column: PFP (150 × 2.1 mm, 2.5 µm).
Mobile phase: 0.1% formic acid in water and methanol, gradient elution.		25(OH)D3: 0.9
25(OH)D2: 1.03		[41]
3α-25(OH)D3,
3β-25(OH)D3		Dried blood spots serumLC-MS/MS1. Dried blood spots: extraction
2. serum: SLE		Kinetex PFP F5 100A column (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 µm).
Mobile phases: (A) water 0.1% formic acid and (B) methanol 0.1% formic acid, gradient elution.		3α-25(OH)D3: 0.1
3β-25(OH)D3: 1.0		[42]
25(OH)D3,
3-epi-25(OH)D3		SerumLC-MS/MSprotein precipitation with acetonitrileColumn: Luna C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 2.3 µm)
Mobile phase: 0.1% formic acid in water and in acetonitrile, isocratic flow		n.a.[43]
25(OH)D3,
3-epi-25(OH)D3		Plasma (cord blood)LC-MS/MSLLE with hexaneColumn: PFP (150 × 2 mm, 3 µm).25(OH)D3: 1.4
3-epi-25(OH)D3: 1.4		[44]
25(OH)D2
25(OH)D3, 24,25(OH)2D3,
3-epi-25(OH)D3		SerumLC-MS/MSLLE with hexaneColumn: Kinetex F5 (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm).
Mobile phase: water and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid, isocratic elution.		n.a.[45]
24,25(OH)2D3
25(OH)D3
3-epi-25(OH)D3
25(OH)D2		SerumLC-MS/MS0.2 mM aqueous zinc sulfate, methanol. LLE with ethyl acetate and hexaneColumn: F5 (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 2.7 µm).
Mobile phase: 0.1% formic acid, 2 mM ammonium acetate in water, and 0.1% formic acid, 2 mM ammonium acetate in methanol, gradient elution		n.a.[46]
D2-S, D3-S
25(OH)D2-S
25(OH)D3-S		Serum,
breast milk		LC-MS/MSSample precipitation with acetonitrileColumn: EC-C18 (15 × 2.1mm, 2.7 µm),
Mobile phase: water with 10mM ammonium formate and methanol with 10mM ammonium formate, gradient elution.		Milk/serum
D2-S: 0.002/0.003
D3-S: 0.003/0.003
25(OH)D2-S: 0.003/0.004
25(OH)D3-S: 0.003/0.004		[47]
25(OH)D3-S,
25(OH)D3-G		Serum, plasmaLC-MS/MSSPE, derivatization with DAPTADColumn: Hypersil Gold (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.9 μm)
Mobile phase: 5 mM ammonium acetate, acetonitrile, gradient elution.		25(OH)D3-S: 2.5
25(OH)D3-G: 1.73		[48]
25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2,
3-epi-25(OH)D3,
1α,25(OH)2D3,
23,25(OH)2D3,
24,25(OH)2D3,
3-epi-25(OH)D2,
1α,25(OH)2D2,
1α,24(OH)2D2,
D2, D3		SerumLC-MS/MSSLEColumn: Lux Cellulose- 3 chiral column (100 × 2 mm, 3 µm).
Mobile phase: methanol/water/0.1% formic acid, gradient elution		n.a.[16]
D3, 25(OH)D3,
24R,25(OH)2 D3,
1α,25(OH)2 D3,
4β,25(OH)2 D3		PlasmaLC-MS/MSLLE with ethyl acetateColumn: Hypersil Gold (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.9 µm).
Mobile phase: acetonitrile/water (0.1% formic acid)		1a,25(OH)2D3: 0.025
24R,25(OH)2D3: 0.05
25OHD3: 0.05		[49]
25(OH)D2,
25(OH)D3,
3-epi-25(OH)D3,
24,25(OH)2D3		SerumLC-MS/MSprotein precipitation with acetonitrile and ZnSO4Column: Kinetex PFP 100 Å (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 μm).
Mobile phase: water and methanol, both with 0.1% formic acid, gradient elution.		24,25(OH)2D3: 0.5
25(OH)D3: 1.1
epi-25(OH)D3: 1.1
25(OH)D2: 1.7		[50]
24,25(OH)2D3, 24,25(OH)2D2,
25(OH)D3,
25(OH)D2		SerumLC-MS/MSSLEColumn: core-shell C18 (50 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 μm).
Mobile phase: water and methanol, both with 0.2 mM methylamine in 0.1% formic acid, gradient elution.		24,25(OH)2D3, 25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2: 0.04
24,25(OH)2D2: 0.34		[51]
24,25(OH)2D3,
24,25(OH)2D2,
1,25(OH)2D2,
25(OH)D3,
3-epi-25(OH)D3,
25(OH)D2,
D2, D3		Serum2D-LC-MS-MSSPEColumns: Poroshel 120 EC-C18 (50 × 4.6 mm, 2.7 µm), Pursuit PFP (100 × 4,6 mm, 3 µm).
Mobile phase: water and methanol, both with 5 mM ammonium formate, 20:80, gradient elution.		24,25(OH)2D3, 24,25(OH)2D2: 0.03
1,25(OH)2D2: 0.05
25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2: 0.25
3-epi-25(OH)D3: 0.3
D2, D3: 0.1		[52]
1,25(OH)2D2,
1,25(OH)2D3		Serum2D ID-UPLC-MS/MSImmuno-extractionColumn 1: C4 BEH300 (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm)
Mobile phase 1: water/water with 0.2%. formic acid/acetonitrile, 75:20:5 (v/v/v), gradient elution.
Column 2: C18 BEH (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm)
Mobile phase 2: 60:40 (v/v) water with 0.2% formic acid/acetonitrile, gradient elution.		1,25(OH)2D2: 0.0015
1,25(OH)2D3: 0.0014		[19]
D3, D2,
25(OH)D3,
1(OH)D3,
1(OH)D2,
24,25(OH)2D3,
1,25(OH)2D2,
1,25(OH)2D3		PlasmaUPSFC-MSLLE with acetonitrileColumns: Torus 2-picolylamine, Torus diethylamine, Torus high density diol, Torus 1-aminoanthracene, fluorophenyl (each column: 100 × 3 mm, 1.7 µm), HSS C18SB (100mm × 3mm, 1.8 µm)
Mobile Phase: CO2, methanol, gradient elution.		D3: 5.43, D2: 7.25
25(OH)D2: 17.22
25(OH)D3: 6.56
1(OH)D3: 7.75
1(OH)D2: 18.11
24,25(OH)2D3: 1.19
1,25(OH)2D2: 6.18
1,25(OH)2D3: 7.57		[13]
25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2,
24(OH)D2, D2, D3,
3-epi-25(OH)D3,
1α,25(OH)2D3,
24R,25(OH)2D3,
23R,25(OH)2D3,
1α,25(OH)2D3-PTAD,
24,25(OH)2D3-PTAD		SerumUPSFC- MS/MSSLEColumn: Lux cellulose-3 chiral column (150 × 3 mm, 3 μm) and UPC2 BEH column (100 × 3 mm, 1.7 μm).
Mobile phase: CO2 and 0.1% formic acid in methanol with a make-up solvent of 0.1% formic acid, gradient elution		1α,25(OH)2D3: 0.08[53]
n.a.—not available; LLE—liquid-liquid extraction; SLE—supported liquid extraction; SPE—solid phase extraction; PTAD—4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoline- 3,5-dione; SFC—supercritical fluid chromatography; 25(OH)D3-S—sulphate of 25(OH)D3; 25(OH)D3-G—glucuronide of 25(OH)D3; UPLC—ultra-performance liquid chromatography; UPSFC—ultra-performance supercritical fluid chromatography; LOQ—limit of quantitation.
Table
Table 2. Analysis of vitamin D status in various diseases.
Table 2. Analysis of vitamin D status in various diseases.
Analyzed CompoundsMatrixDiseaseStudied Group (N)ConclusionsRef.
25(OH)D3
3-Epi-25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2, 24,25(OH)2D3,
1,25(OH)2D3		Synovial fluid serumRA20 patients
with rheumatoid arthritis (RA),
7 patients with resolving reactive arthritis (ReA),
23 healthy controls
  • significantly lower serum 3-epi-25(OH)D3 in RA (median 0.788 ng/mL, p < 0.01) and ReA patients (median 0.361 ng/mL, p < 0.05) relative to healthy controls
[57]
vitamin DserumRA149 patients with RA
  • statistically significant improved mean disease activity index in RA patients after supplementation (p = 0.002)
  • improved serum vitamin D levels (from 10.05 ± 5.18 to 57.21 ± 24.77 ng/mL, p < 0.001) during the treatment.
[59]
1,25(OH)2D
25(OH)D		serumpsoriasis122 patients with psoriasisInverse relationship found between 1,25(OH)2D and:
  • visceral adipose (β = −0.43, p = 0.026).
  • aortic vascular uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (β = −0.19, p = 0.01)
  • non-calcified coronary plaque burden (β = −0.18, p = 0.03)
[61]
25(OH)D3serummetabolic disorders92 subjects deficient in vitamin D; 48 with vitamin D supplementation and 44 without supplementation
  • Higher serum level of vitamin D after three-month supplementation with 2000 IU vitamin D (p < 0.001)
  • Association of higher exposure to vitamin D and decreased level of oxidative DNA damage in lymphocytes (p < 0.05), increased HDL, decreased HOMA-IR, TG/HDL ratio.
[64]
25(OH)Dserumbreast and prostate cancer15.748 breast cancer cases,
22.898 prostate cancer cases
  • No association between 25(OH)D and risk of breast cancer, estrogen receptor, prostate cancer or the advanced cancer subtype.
[69]
25(OH)Dblood *colorectal cancer5706 colorectal cancer participants, 7107 controls
  • Association of deficient 25(OH)D (<30 nmol/L) with 31% higher colorectal cancer risk (RR = 1.31).
  • Association of 25(OH)D concentrations of 75–<87.5 and 87.5–<100 nmol/L with 19% (RR = 0.81) and 27% (RR = 0.73) lower risk of colorectal cancer.
[70]
Vitamin DserumCancer
cardiovascular disease		25,871
(12,927 after supplementation, 12,944 after placebo)		After 1-year supplementation of 2 000 IU vitamin D:
  • 40% increase in mean 25(OH)D levels
  • no result in a lower incidence of invasive cancer or cardiovascular events.
[71]
1,25(OH)2D3serumDiabetic Retinopathy66 diabetic patients,
20 nondiabetic healthy patients
  • Lower mean serum 1,25(OH)2D3 and 25(OH)D concentrations in diabetic patients (p < 0.001)
  • lower 1,25(OH)2D3 concentrations in patients with diabetic retinopathy
  • negative correlations between 1,25(OH)2D3 and age (p < 0.01) and duration of diabetes (p < 0.05).
[72]
25(OH)Dserumchronic obstructive pulmonary disease278Association of vitamin D deficiency (<50 nmol/L) with:
  • reduced % predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (p for trend = 0.06)
  • reduced % predicted forced vital capacity (p for trend = 0.003).
[73]
25(OH)Dserummetabolic syndrome559 Chinese subjects at elevated risk of metabolic syndrome
  • Lower 25(OH)D levels in participants with obesity, high triglycerides, type 2 diabetes, or MS (all p < 0.05)
  • 2.5 times higher incidence of MS in participants in the lowest 25(OH)D tertile compared to those in the highest tertile (OR 2.48; p < 0.05).
[74]
25(OH)DDried blood spotsmultiple sclerosis521 patients with multiple sclerosis, 972 controls
  • Highest multiple sclerosis risk among individuals with 25(OH)D concentration < 20.7 nmol/L and lowest among those with 25(OH)D levels ≥48.9 nmol/L (OR 0.53).
[75]
25(OH)DserumBronchiolitis50 infants with bronchiolitis,
31 controls
  • Significantly lower the mean serum 25(OH) vitamin D in patients with bronchiolitis (p = 0.003).
  • Non-significant negative correlation of serum IgE with serum 25(OH) vitamin D (r = −0.141, p ≥ 0.05).
[76]
25[OH]D3serumfood allergy5276,
269 nonallergic at age 1 y,
338 food allergic at age 1 y,
50 egg tolerant at age 2 y,
55 egg allergic at age 2 y		Association of low serum 25(OH)D3 level (≤50 nM/L) at age 1 years with:
  • food allergy (OR 12.6)
  • among infants with the GG genotype for DBP (OR 6.0) but not in those with GT/TT genotypes (OR, 0.7, p = 0.014).
[77]
25(OH)D3serumchronic kidney disease, depression533 Koreans participants
  • Higher prevalence of depression in chronic kidney disease patients with vitamin D deficiency (32.5% vs. 50.0% without deficiency, p < 0.001).
  • Vitamin D deficiency as a significant independent predictor of depression (OR 6.15; p = 0.001).
[78]
Vitamin DserumDepression5006
  • More depressive symptoms in men and women with deficient (<30 nmol/L) vs. adequate (≥50 nmol/L) vitamin D status
  • Higher incidence of current major depressive disorder (OR 2.51) in men with deficient vitamin D status.
[79]
25(OH)DserumPost-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)1653
  • 25(OH)D levels inversely associated with PTSD (OR: 0.96; p = 0.044)
  • Vitamin D deficiency positively associated with PTSD (OR = 2.02; p = 0.028).
[80]
* not specified if plasma or serum was used for 25(OH)D measurements. HOMA-IR—homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance.
Table
Table 3. Factors influencing vitamin D status in human body.
Table 3. Factors influencing vitamin D status in human body.
FactorsStudied Group (N)ConclusionsRef.
Parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium2259 adults (18–68 years old).Significant correlations between Ca2+ and PTH (r = −0.223, p < 0.001), 25(OH)D and PTH (r = −0.178, p < 0.001) and between PTH and age (r = 0.322, p < 0.001) were found.[17]
calcium, PTH, alkaline phosphatase58 children and adolescentsA positive and significant correlation was found between dietary calcium and vitamin D (r = 0.77, p < 0.001).[90]
sun exposure (<30 min and ≥30 min per week)
PTH
ionized calcium		1339 ≥18 years oldThe median of 25(OH)D <10 ng/mL associated with hypercalcemia. The levels of 25(OH)D were higher in women who received >30 min of sun exposure per week, and who claimed to use sunscreen <3 times/week (p ≤ 0.001).[91]
glutathione and cysteine thiol/di-sulfide redox status693 adults (449 females, 244 males)Serum 25(OH)D was positively associated with plasma GSH and negatively associated with plasma redox potentials—Eh GSSG and Cys (p < 0.001 for all).[92]
low dietary magnesium intake57 (22–65 years old, BMI 25–45 kg/m2)Higher serum levels of 25(OH)D were negatively associated with lower PTH in the high magnesium intake group (p = 0.041). A positive relationship between 25(OH)D and serum adiponectin concentrations was observed in the high magnesium intake group (r = 0.532, r = 0.022). Serum interleukin-6 concentrations were negatively associated with 25(OH)D levels (r = −0.316, p = 0.017).[94]
nuclear factor kappa-B activity49In healthy adults, 25(OH)D concentrations were positively associated with NFκB activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (r = 0.48, p = 0.0008).[95]
place of residence: urban area, rural area,
season, sex		17,590 (urban
n = 4824; rural n = 12,766)		Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were lower among rural compared to urban dwellers and depend on sex (p < 0.001) and age (for urban p < 0.001, for rural p < 0.001).[99]
Ancestry, vitamin D binding protein750 healthy children (6–36 months old)25(OH)D levels are positively correlated with circulating DBP (R = 0.25, p < 0.001). Circulating 25(OH)D was positively correlated with European ancestry (p < 0.001), and negatively correlated with African ancestry (R = −0.09, p = 0.016).[100]
vitamin D supplementation,
sun exposure (>20 min/day during summer, and >30 min/day during fall)		50: sun
50: oral vitamin D3
50: placebo		Increases in serum 25(OH)D were greater with oral vitamin D3 than with sun exposure (difference in changes = 6.3 ng/mL, 95% CI: 4.3, 8.3). 54.2% participants in the oral vitamin D3, 12.2% in the sun exposure and 4.3% controls achieved serum 25(OH)D concentrations ≥20 ng/mL[102]
sun exposure (0–1 h/day, 1–3 h/day, and >3 h/day), dietary intake1084 adultsThe odds of having 25(OH)D <20 ng/mL significantly decreased with being very active (OR 0.55), increasing length of sun exposure (1–3 h/day (OR 0.59), >3 h/day (OR 0.36)), and skin color (light to medium skin (OR 0.47), fairly dark skin color (OR 0.34) and dark or very dark skin color (OR 0.34)), compared to respective baseline levels.[103]
sex50 > 65 years oldSignificant association between low vitamin D level and female gender (p = 0.024), advanced age (p = 0.026), no-sun exposure jobs (p = 0.001) and nursing home residency.[108]
adiposity, age
sex		10,696 at 6–18 years oldThe prevalence rates of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency were higher in girls (31% and 83.4%, respectively) than in boys (22.8% and 78.7%, respectively). Fat mass index and fat mass percentage were inversely associated with 25(OH)D concentrations, particularly in boys (p < 0.05). The association of age with vitamin D had L-shape with a threshold age of 14.[109]
adiposity163 obeseSerum 25(OH)D concentrations were negatively associated with percent body fat (%BF) (p = 0.003), positively associated with skeletal muscle mass (SMM) (p = 0.03).[110]
adiposity797Mean 25(OH)D levels were significantly higher in normal weight and overweight males compared to obese males (p < 0.05) and in overweight females compared to obese females (p < 0.05). BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-height ratio were inversely correlated with 25(OH)D levels (p < 0.001).[111]
BMI,
adiposity		women with age 19–8025(OH)D concentration was dependent on season. BMI demonstrated the highest significant inverse correlation with serum 25(OH)D values (p < 0.001), independently from season and age.[112]
age, sex, obesity, season, latitudes, lifetime sun exposure (scores: 1–10), physical activity, ancestry1828
Caucasian middle-aged men and women		Vitamin D status was lower among women (p < 0.0001), older subjects (p = 0.04), obese or underweight subjects (p < 0.0001), subjects who lived at higher latitudes (p < 0.0001), and those whose blood draw occurred in early spring (p < 0.0001). Vitamin D status was higher among subjects who were more physically active (p < 0.0001), who had higher scores of usual sun exposure (p < 0.0001), those with higher Fitzpatrick photo-type (p = 0.03).[105]
nutritional and lifestyle patterns116Vitamin D deficiency was associated with higher systolic ambulatory and daytime blood pressure monitoring (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively), lower step counts, lower urinary calcium, and higher fat mass. Milk intake (p = 0.009) and fish (p < 0.001) were lower in the deficient.[113]
vitamin D supplementation,
microbiome		50 adolescent girls before and after vitamin D supplementationThe mean (±SD) of serum vitamin D level at baseline was 11 ± 9 ng/mL and after high dose vitamin D supplementation it increases to 40 ± 17 ng/mL (p < 0.001). A high dose supplementation of vitamin D alter the human gut microbiome composition: Bacteroidetes and Lactobacillus fell by 72% and 24% respectively, whilst Firmicutes and Bifidobacterium were increased by1.5 and 1.2 fold after supplementation.[116]
Vitamin D binding protein210 children (1–5 years old)25(OH)D levels correlated positively with DBP (r = 0.298, p = 0.0001). 52.7% of children with vitamin D deficiency had low DBP (p = 0.015). Despite adequate sun exposure, 43% of children showed vitamin D deficiency and 56.6% had low DBP levels.[119]
Vitamin D binding protein368 pregnant womenFree 25(OH)D lowers by 12% in the 3rd trimester comparing to the 1st trimester (p < 0.05) whereas total 25(OH)D was not decreased. DBP rises with gestational age.[120]
Vitamin D binding protein, race1661 adults (healthy, prediabetic, pregnant, cirrhotic, nursing home residents)Levels of free 25(OH)D were higher in patients with cirrhosis (p < 0.0033) while DBP concentrations were lower than in other groups and differed between whites and blacks (p < 0.0033) and between DBP haplotypes (p < 0.0001).[121]
rs12785878, rs10741657, rs6013897, rs2282679461 (33–79 years old) Participants with CC genotype (rs2282679) had shorter age- and sex-adjusted mean leukocyte telomere length (LTL) than those with AC and AA genotypes (p < 0.05). Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were not associated with LTL.[124]
FokI
BsmI
TaqI
Cdx2		237 participants with metabolic syndrome (MetS),
376 controls		VDR TaqI TT, and BsmI BB + Bb genotypes were associated with lower 25(OH)D levels (p < 0.05) in comparison to TaqI Tt, and BsmI bb genotypes in the MetS group. Cdx2 GG genotype was associated with higher waist circumference compared with the AG genotype in all subjects (p < 0.05). BB + Bb genotypes of the VDR BsmI had significantly increased the odds ratio of hypertriglyceridemia when compared with the bb genotype (OR 1.87, p = 0.022).[126]
BsmI
Apa-I
TaqI
obesity		201 obese women with vitamin D deficiency;
249 controls		In obese with vitamin D deficiency, carriers of polymorphic alleles showed significant lower levels of serum 25(OH)D and higher HOMA-IR (the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; p = 0.04), blood pressure levels (p < 0.001) and lipid parameters compared to those with the wild type homozygotes (p = 0.02).[127]
receptor gene BsmI (A/G) polymorphism60 females with breast cancer (BC)25(OH) vitamin D levels were significantly lower in the patients with BC compared to controls (p ≤ 0.001). Carriers of Bb genotype had 4.6 times increased risk of developing breast cancer when compared to other genotypes.[128]
BsmI polymorphism of the VDR gene, supplementation40 elderly women with vitamin D insufficiencySupplementation with a vitamin D3 megadose reduced inflammatory markers and increased the total antioxidant capacity in elderly women with vitamin D insufficiency (p = 0.03). The 25(OH)D (p = 0.0001), PTH (p = 0.009), us-CRP (p = 0.007) and α1-acid glycoprotein (p = 0.005) levels of elderly patients with the BB/Bb genotype were more responsive to supplementation compared with those with the bb genotype.[129]
CYP2R127 children with rickets,
50 unrelated subjects		After supplementation with 50,000 IU of vitamin D2 or vitamin D3, heterozygous subjects for the L99P and K242N mutations
had lower increases in serum 25(OH)D than control subjects.		[130]
rs4588,
supplementation		619 healthy adolescent girlsPolymorphism of rs4588 was associated with serum 25(OH)D both at baseline (p = 0.03) and after supplementation (p = 0.008). The subjects with common AA genotype were a better responder to vitamin D supplementation than GG.[118]
CYP2R1 (rs10766197),
supplementation		253 healthy girlsSubjects who had homozygous major allele GG showed two-fold higher response in serum 25(OH)D than carriers of the uncommon allele A (OR = 2.1, p = 0.03).[131]
DNA methylation levels of CYP2R1, CYP24A1, CYP27A1, CYP27B1446 women supplemented with calcium and vitamin DFor CYP2R1, baseline DNA methylation levels at eight CpG sites were negatively associated with the 12-month increase in serum 25(OH)D (p < 0.05). For CYP24A1, baseline DNA methylation levels at −342C and −293C were negatively associated with vitamin D response variation (p = 0.011, p = 0.025, respectively).[132]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kowalówka, M.; Główka, A.K.; Karaźniewicz-Łada, M.; Kosewski, G. Clinical Significance of Analysis of Vitamin D Status in Various Diseases. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2788. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092788

AMA Style

Kowalówka M, Główka AK, Karaźniewicz-Łada M, Kosewski G. Clinical Significance of Analysis of Vitamin D Status in Various Diseases. Nutrients. 2020; 12(9):2788. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092788

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kowalówka, Magdalena, Anna K. Główka, Marta Karaźniewicz-Łada, and Grzegorz Kosewski. 2020. "Clinical Significance of Analysis of Vitamin D Status in Various Diseases" Nutrients 12, no. 9: 2788. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092788

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop