Next Article in Journal
Role of Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in Alcoholic and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Involvement of Mitochondrial Mechanisms and Cyclooxygenase-2 Activation in the Effect of Desethylamiodarone on 4T1 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Line
Previous Article in Journal
Telomere Shortening and Its Association with Cell Dysfunction in Lung Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptome Profile Analysis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells in Response to a Novel Cytostatic Tetrahydroisoquinoline Compared to Paclitaxel
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms23010424
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Other Side of the Coin: May Androgens Have a Role in Breast Cancer Risk?

by
Chiara Chiodo
†,
Catia Morelli
†,
Fabiola Cavaliere
,
Diego Sisci
and
Marilena Lanzino
*
Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Science, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci, Arcavacata di Rende, 87036 Cosenza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(1), 424; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010424
Submission received: 8 December 2021 / Revised: 24 December 2021 / Accepted: 29 December 2021 / Published: 31 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breast Cancer: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Breast cancer prevention is a major challenge worldwide. During the last few years, efforts have been made to identify molecular breast tissue factors that could be linked to an increased risk of developing the disease in healthy women. In this concern, steroid hormones and their receptors are key players since they are deeply involved in the growth, development and lifetime changes of the mammary gland and play a crucial role in breast cancer development and progression. In particular, androgens, by binding their own receptor, seem to exert a dichotomous effect, as they reduce cell proliferation in estrogen receptor α positive (ERα+) breast cancers while promoting tumour growth in the ERα negative ones. Despite this intricate role in cancer, very little is known about the impact of androgen receptor (AR)-mediated signalling on normal breast tissue and its correlation to breast cancer risk factors. Through an accurate collection of experimental and epidemiological studies, this review aims to elucidate whether androgens might influence the susceptibility for breast cancer. Moreover, the possibility to exploit the AR as a useful marker to predict the disease will be also evaluated.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is the most prevalent female malignancy and the leading cause of cancer death in women, surpassing lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%) worldwide [1,2]. For this reason, breast cancer prevention remains challenging, as an early diagnosis of the disease can lead to a good prognosis and a high survival rate. Although breast cancer screening programs are fundamental in prevention efforts, the introduction of a reliable strategy to predict women at elevated risk and prevent the disease has been less successful [3,4].
Among the molecular markers potentially linked to the risk of developing breast cancer in healthy women [5,6], steroid hormones and their receptors represent good candidates to investigate since they drive the cyclical remodelling of the mammary gland from menarche to menopause [7,8].
Most studies have highlighted the contribution of estrogens and progesterone in breast cancer risk and tumour development. The role of androgens in breast tumour growth, prognosis and treatment has only recently emerged, even though androgen treatment was historically used as an effective therapeutic option for breast cancer. Indeed, for the first half of the 20th century, therapies utilizing androgen receptor (AR) agonists, such as testosterone propionate and fluoxymesterone, were reserved for postmenopausal breast cancer patients, showing a disease regression rate of ~20–25%, which was only slightly less effective than the rate observed following estrogen-based therapy [9,10,11,12,13]. However, the occurrence of adverse side-effects, such as increased aggressive behaviour and virilisation [10], together with the ability of androgens to be converted into estrogens, caused the loss of androgen therapy popularity in the 1970s. Concomitantly, Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) became the primary treatment option due to a better efficacy and toxicity profile over conventional hormonal therapies [11,12].
AR expression and action differ among the various breast cancer subtypes. The AR shows a higher positivity in estrogen receptor alpha-positive (ERα+) luminal A tumours than in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [14,15,16]. Moreover, the AR acts as a tumour suppressor in the diverse setting of ERα+ breast cancer, including endocrine-resistant cancers. Indeed, the AR is associated with favourable clinicopathological features and a better outcome in this subset of cancers and represents a positive predictive biomarker of the response to endocrine therapy [14,17,18]. AR agonists, such as the natural ligand dihydrotestosterone (DHT) or the Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator (SARM) enobosarm (lacking virilising activity), exert an anti-proliferative effect in normal mammary epithelium, as well as in ERα+ breast cancer, both in vitro and in vivo [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. This observation strengthens the idea of using SARM for novel androgen-targeted therapy in ERα-driven breast cancers.
On the other hand, the role of the AR in ERα negative (ERα-) breast cancer is controversial and its prognostic value remains uncertain [27,28,29]. Androgen administration has been shown to exert an anti-proliferative effect in ERα- breast cancer cell lines through the AR-mediated up-regulation of the tumour suppressors PTEN, which, in turn, by inducing p53 and p73 expression, promotes apoptosis [30,31]. Nevertheless, AR signalling is mainly considered oncogenic in these tumour settings [8,32,33]. In fact, AR activation controls cell cycle progression by increasing cyclin D1 expression while reducing p73 and p21 levels [34], and promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition, migration and invasiveness in AR+ TNBC cell lines. Accordingly, blocking AR activity and synthesis reduces tumour growth in patient-derived xenograft models [35,36]. Since a similar pro-tumorigenic role of AR has also been observed in ERα-/HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers [37], AR blockage has been proposed as an effective treatment strategy in ERα- breast cancer [38,39,40].
Therefore, the heterogeneity of androgen action within the different breast cancer subtypes has driven the chance to exploit specific AR signalling pathway(s) for successful therapeutic interventions in ongoing clinical trials, employing both AR agonists and antagonists for the treatment of different cohorts of breast cancer patients (Table 1) [41].
Despite this well-documented importance of AR signalling in breast cancer growth and progression, very little is known about the association of androgens, AR expression and breast cancer risk in healthy individuals. This review aims to elucidate whether AR activity might impact on breast cancer susceptibility by collecting evidences of AR-dependent signalling in normal breast epithelium and on its relationship with well-known breast cancer risk factors.

2. AR Expression and Action in Normal Mammary Gland

Normal mammary epithelium arises from three specific subsets of cells, hierarchically classified in one population of basal and two populations of luminal mammary epithelial cells. The latter are identified as secretory or hormone-sensing cells and also named as L1 and L2, respectively. L1 secretory luminal mammary epithelial cells are mainly involved in milk production and are characterized by the lack of both ER and progesterone receptors (PR); L2 hormone-sensing mammary epithelial cells, instead, express ER and PR and have a crucial role in the endocrine stimulation of the gland [42,43]. Indeed, receptor-positive cells are the sensors of local and/or circulating steroid hormones, which regulate mammary epithelium differentiation through autocrine and/or paracrine signals [44].
Interestingly, within the normal human breast tissue, AR has been found to be expressed in both basal and, to a greater extent, in hormone-sensing mammary epithelial cells [42,43]. This concomitant expression of the AR in both basal and hormone-sensing cell subpopulations may explain the dichotomous role exerted by the AR in the different breast cancer settings [42,45]. It has been demonstrated that the AR is the most expressed nuclear receptor in both human and mice ERα+/PR+ mammary luminal epithelium [8,46]. More specifically, the AR has been suggested to sustain a luminal phenotype, as evidenced by its expression within cells undergoing a basal-to-luminal transition. To explain how this occurs, a model has been proposed in mice, in which expression and activation of the AR in basal mammary epithelial cells fosters the achievement of a luminal trait [42] in terms of morphology, position within the mammary gland and gene expression [42,43,47]. This model is supported by the observation that AR signalling is also involved in supporting the maintenance of a luminal state in the human breast cancer framework [48]. Thus, the AR-dependent signalling operates in both basal and luminal mammary epithelial cells. The AR promotion of a basal-to-luminal differentiation in mammary epithelial cells may have a fundamental role in normal breast physiology. Indeed, since testosterone, the main female circulating androgen [8], is the preeminent estradiol precursor [49], it has been speculated that ligand–AR activation may favour a luminal phenotype by acting as an indicator of a sufficient estrogen availability to maintain the ER/PR crosstalk necessary for mammary gland differentiation and function [42].
Thus, the AR-dependent signalling operates in both basal and luminal mammary epithelial cells. Findings regarding its participation in the mammary gland developmental process are controversial.
Gao et al., observed a significant increase in ductal growth and extension and a higher number of terminal end buds, (corresponding to human terminal duct luminal units, TDLUs) [50] in AR-knockout (ARex3ΔKO) female mice at the pubertal time, compared to wild-type females. The latter, instead, responded to DHT administration with a ~50% reduction in ductal extension [51]. Oddly, in adult AR−/− mice after puberty, a reduced ductal branching was observed. This condition was partially restored during pregnancy, but the number of milk-producing alveoli remained smaller [52].
In the human breast, androgens mainly exert anti-proliferative effects under physiological conditions. In males, when the estradiol (E2)–testosterone (T) ratio is altered due to estrogen excess and/or androgen deficiency, gynecomastia can occur [53,54,55]. Indeed, about 70% of men affected by Klinefelter syndrome, a sex chromosome disorder associated with hypogonadism, display gynecomastia and have an increased risk of developing a breast tumour [56].
In females, breast changes during the lifetime phases, puberty, menstrual period and menopause, arise from the dynamic interplay of androgens and estrogens [57]. In preclinical studies conducted on ovariectomized rhesus monkeys, T co-administration with E2, notoriously mitogenic for mammary cells, caused a 40% inhibition of the E2-induced expression of the epithelial cell proliferation marker Ki67. This effect occurred through the reduction of ERα expression/activity [58], suggesting that androgens act as modulators of estrogen effects on mammary epithelial cell proliferation. Analogously, in the human female at puberty, androgens reduce breast growth by inhibiting ductal elongation and the proliferation of epithelial cells, antagonizing the stimulatory effects of estrogens [46]. Of note, the androgen anti-proliferative and anti-estrogenic activity is not limited at puberty but is maintained during adulthood [57], suggesting the crucial role of AR/androgen signalling in modulating lifetime breast development and changes.

3. Androgen Signalling in Normal Breast Epithelium and Cancer Susceptibility

The hierarchical organization of normal mammary epithelium, and the molecular markers expressed within, are promising keys to understand the origin of breast cancer and to prevent its occurrence [43,45]. Since the majority of mammary tumours show hallmarks of a luminal phenotype, including steroid receptor positivity [59], it should not be a surprise that their distribution in normal breast tissue might strongly dictate cancer susceptibility. Although the AR is recognized as an important player in mammary gland physiology, and it is considered to be an emerging prognostic marker in ER-positive breast cancers [60,61], data regarding the relationship between AR expression and activity in mammary epithelial cells and cancer risk are still very limited.
The potential correlation between AR structure and breast cancer susceptibility has been investigated in a number of studies. Exon 1 of the AR gene carries a short tandem of 8 to 35 glutamine CAG repeats, whose length seems to inversely correlate with AR transcriptional activity. In fact, the shorter the AR-CAG unit length is (<19 repeats), the higher the AR activation [62,63,64]. Thus, the CAG polymorphism can lead to receptor dysfunction and, consequently, to pathological conditions such as androgen insensitivity [65,66] and can affect the growth of androgen-dependent tumours, such as prostate cancer [67].
These evidences suggested investigating if the CAG length could also impact on breast cancer risk. A potential increased risk was evidenced by Haiman et al., among Caucasian women with long CAG repeats only with a concomitant first-degree breast cancer family history [68]. However, additional study population and epidemiological analysis revealed a positive [69,70,71] as well as a negative association [64] between the longest AR-CAG units and an increased risk of developing the disease. Unfortunately, the conflicting data available, mainly due to age, ethnicity or family history patient variability, do not provide the possibility to establish an effective association between abnormal AR structure, and subsequent AR activity, and breast tumour susceptibility.
As stated above, characterization of the hierarchical organization and function of mammary epithelial cells is crucial for a better comprehension of how breast cancer arises as well as for the identification of novel breast cancer risk biomarkers [43,45]. In this context, examination of a very large number of human breast tumours indicated that expression of the AR in normal luminal mammary epithelial cells did not overlap with the expression of Ki67 [72], a well-known marker of cell proliferation strongly correlated with breast cancer risk [6,73], indicating a lower proliferating profile for this cell subtype [72].
More recently, the possibility of using the AR as a predictor marker of breast cancer risk was investigated in a nested case-control study on women with benign breast disease (BBD). In the analysed population (78 patients vs 276 controls), no associations were found between AR expression in normal human mammary tissue, evaluated by immunohistochemistry on BBD biopsies, and breast cancer risk. However, when AR expression was assessed in relation to ERα (47 patients vs 127 controls), high levels of AR were moderately associated with a lower risk of disease [74]. Unfortunately, although confirming the ability of AR to antagonize ERα activity [75,76,77], the small sample size used in this study does not allow a relationship between AR and ERα expression in normal mammary epithelium and cancer susceptibility to be established.
Therefore, even if the available findings (Figure 1) seem to suggest a protective role of AR in preventing breast cancer onset, due to the very limited data at one’s disposal, future investigations are needed to better clarify the specific role of AR in the crucial events triggering a neoplastic transformation in mammary epithelial cells.

4. Exogenous Androgen Exposure and Breast Cancer Incidence

Androgens have often been used for therapeutic purposes in women, mainly to treat hypoactive sexual desire disorder or menopausal symptoms [78,79]. Therefore, the evidence of an anti-proliferative action of androgens in normal mammary cells raises the question of what their impact would be on breast cancer risk and development.
The effects of T exposure on breast cancer development have been recently investigated in a prospective 10 year cohort study enrolling 1267 pre- and postmenopausal women receiving implants of T to treat the symptoms of androgen deficiency or T implants in combination with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (a therapeutic option for estrogen excess, obesity and breast cancer prevention). Invasive breast cancer (IBC) was diagnosed in 11 women, while 3 patients developed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Interestingly, comparing the results with the age-matched Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, used for the assessment of breast cancer incidence rates, showed that the incidence of both IBC and DCIS was lower in the examined population (165/100,000 p-y vs 271/100,000 p-y for IBC; 45/100,000 p-y vs 84/100,000 p-y for DCIS) [80]. Accordingly, a significant reduction in IBC risk, compared to the age-matched SEER incidence rate, was recently evidenced in pre- and postmenopausal women following T or T + E2 implant therapy [81]. However, no association was found between the use of transdermal T for the treatment of the hypoactive sexual desire disorder in postmenopausal women and an increased incidence of breast cancer [82].
This protective effect of exogenous androgens is consistent with previous studies, which detected a lower proliferative index in mammary tissues from women undergoing estrogen–progestin hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in combination with T, compared to HRT alone [83], as well as in ex vivo normal human breast tissues exposed to DHT [84,85].
Nevertheless, these observations are in contrast with the findings that contraceptive progestins with androgenic activity, such as the T-related and widely used levonorgestrel, promote hyperproliferation of the breast epithelium with cytological changes, in a xenograft model obtained through intraductal injection of human mammary cells expressing hormone receptors [86]. Though limited by the fact that the hormonal milieu of human breast epithelial cells in mice is quite different to that in humans, these findings are consistent with a prospective study, involving 1,359,323 p-y from 1978 to 2002, that revealed an increased risk of IBC in postmenopausal women receiving estrogen/androgen hormone therapies compared with patients treated with estrogens alone [87].
A good tool to investigate the potential correlation between exogenous sex steroid hormones and breast cancer susceptibility is provided by transgender patients since androgen therapy is crucial to achieve the gender switch through physical feature changes in trans men with female sex assigned at birth. According to androgens’ anti-proliferative properties on breast epithelial cells, T therapy reduces mammary gland volume, increases fibrous connective tissues and inhibits the incidence of breast cancer in transgender men [88,89]. However, it is worth underlining that, in these patients, the disease is rare and only documented by a few case reports evaluating AR expression in tumour tissue [90,91,92]. Tanini et al., reported one case of IBC and one of DCIS in two trans men patients, both before top surgery. The diagnosis occurred following 3 and 2.5 years of T therapy, and the AR expression was 60% and 80%, respectively. Nevertheless, both patients reported a strong breast cancer family history [93], which is often a limiting factor in the evaluation of androgen therapy impact on breast cancer risk in this subset of patients.
Another recent retrospective cohort study investigated the consequence of hormone therapy in 3489 Netherland transgender (2260 trans women and 1229 trans men). Only four cases of IBC were diagnosed in trans men, who were associated with a high risk, compared to cisgender men, and with a lower risk, compared to cisgender women [88].
Thus, the role of exogenous androgens in preventing or promoting breast cancer is still controversial. However, available data suggest that androgen administration might be likely to be associated with a reduced or, at least, unchanged risk of developing breast cancer.

5. Androgen Over-Production and Breast Cancer Risk

Androgen over-production may occur in para-physiological and pathological conditions (i.e., polycystic ovarian disease, adrenocortical carcinoma, ovarian hyperthecosis, adrenal hyperplasia) [94]. In such circumstances, for the androgen excess theory of breast cancer [95], androgen surplus is regarded as the key player of endocrine imbalance in women with breast cancer due to the lack of proper control on the mammary epithelial growth and the creation of a hormonal vicious circle. Indeed, a prolonged exposure to high levels of T leads to a constant increase in estradiol production by the aromatase enzyme, resulting in ERα synthesis induction and a continuous cell proliferation. Concomitantly, the conversion of T into its non-aromatizable metabolite DHT by the 5α-reductase enzyme, is also enhanced. At first, increased DHT levels exert their anti-estrogenic and growth inhibitory effects but, in the long run, they are unable to block estrogen proliferative action, unless the source of androgen excess is removed [57].
Accordingly, increased prepubertal androgen levels have been associated with earlier breast development [96].
Houghton et al., recently reported that androstenedione, T and free-T (fT) levels were higher in girls with a first-degree breast cancer family history (BCFH) than in those without a BCFH, while dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) was increased only in girls with breast cancer-specific distress, presumably following adrenal gland hypersecretion due to the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activation. Importantly, since DHEA-S is not only a natural precursor of androstenedione and T but also of E2, earlier breast development might be likely to be linked to estrogen production. Thus, these patients may also be considered at high risk of developing breast cancer [96].
Increased levels of androgens can also result from ovarian stromal hyperplasia. Therefore, a proposed therapeutic approach in postmenopausal women with excessive ovarian androgen production and at high risk of developing breast cancer consists of reducing high T blood levels by administrating gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues, leading to a medically-induced oophorectomy: lowering T serum concentrations means losing substrate for estrogen synthesis and, in turn, depriving E2 proliferative stimulus on breast cells [97].
The positive association between high endogenous androgens’ serum levels and breast cancer risk has been confirmed by several other studies, both in pre- [98,99,100] and postmenopausal women [101,102].
Conclusively, being a source of estrogens, androgens’ hyperproduction seems to correlate to an increased risk of breast cancer. However, since most of the studies evaluated circulating T levels that are metabolized in estrogens [103] and the effects of T on mammary cell proliferation are closely related to 5α-reductase and aromatase tissue expression and activity, these evidences cannot totally reflect the hormone concentration within normal breast tissue because the gland follows its own specific intracrinology [32]. Therefore, a promising method to measure breast steroid hormone levels could be the fine nipple aspiration that, allowing to distinguish the differences between local and serum hormone concentrations [104,105], might provide helpful data to assess breast cancer susceptibility. Moreover, AR expression was not assessed in these studies, making it difficult to understand if AR activation might promote, or not, the malignant transformation.

6. Androgens/AR and Breast Cancer Risk Factors

Several factors contribute to a woman being considered at high risk of developing breast cancer, including family history, high-risk predisposition genes, high mammographic density (MD) and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms [106]. MD has been indicated as a strong and independent risk factor for breast cancer [107,108]. However, few studies have evaluated the association of endogenous sex steroids with MD and breast cancer risk [106,109]. Regarding androgens, endogenous serum fT has been inversely associated with MD in premenopausal women [110]. In addition, circulating dehydroepiandrosterone counteracts fT effects on MD in healthy postmenopausal women by antagonizing its binding to the AR [111,112].
An important correlation also exists between germ-line mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2), which are associated with a 40–85% lifetime breast cancer risk [106], and AR structure and transcriptional activity. The AR polymorphism characterized by longer AR-CAG repeats within the AR gene and resulting in a deficient AR activity, has been associated with an increase in breast cancer risk at an early age in patients carrying the BRCA-1 mutation [113]. Of note, BRCA-1 overexpression is able to overcome the AR-CAG repeats-driven inhibitory effect on AR activity in mammary and prostate epithelial cell lines. Indeed, overexpressed BRCA-1 and the p160 coactivator GRIP1, synergically coactivate AR, increasing its transcriptional activity [114].

7. Conclusions

In the struggle to defeat breast cancer, prevention programs play an essential role, even long before disease onset: valuable breast cancer risk markers and prediction models, by improving individualized risk assessment, could be helpful, not only for the patients but also for their health providers, in making decisions about the right screening program and/or chemoprevention procedure to adopt.
Endogenous sex hormones’ levels have been associated with increased breast cancer risk. Due to the pivotal role of estrogens in normal breast proliferation and the identification of increased ERα expression as a risk factor for breast cancer development, preventive therapy is aimed at reducing estrogen levels and/or antagonizing receptor activity.
On the other hand, very few reports focus on the potential role of androgens and AR status as markers of breast cancer risk in healthy individuals, and this review was meant to cope with this aim.
Nevertheless, given the complexity of AR action within the breast, no univocal conclusion could be drawn. Indeed, the available data on the role of androgens/AR in preventing or promoting breast cancer are still controversial. In fact, AR-dependent signalling has been reported to exert either beneficial or deleterious effects on breast tissue, even if, under physiological conditions, its activation seems to protect against breast cancer development, at least in part for its ability to counteract ERα action.
These discrepancies are mostly due to the lack of normal breast sample availability and non-uniform cohorts of patients recruited for clinical studies (e.g., patients previously subjected to other treatments and/or their breast cancer susceptibility), as well as due to the complexity of androgen intracrinology within the mammary gland.
Therefore, future studies are needed to accurately discern the role of androgens/ARs in normal breast tissue, so as to unambiguously understand whether the receptor might become a useful and reliable biomarker in breast cancer preventive screening programs. As happened for ERα, this understanding will shed light on the possible exploitation of SARMS or antagonists as novel potential chemoprevention agents in women with a high risk of breast cancer.

Author Contributions

C.C. designed and wrote the manuscript. C.M. wrote the manuscript and provided critical feedback. F.C. and D.S. wrote the manuscript. M.L. conceived and wrote the manuscript, supervised and provided critical feedback. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Ministero Istruzione Università e Ricerca—MIUR (ex 60% 2019).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Harbeck, N.; Penault-Llorca, F.; Cortes, J.; Gnant, M.; Houssami, N.; Poortmans, P.; Ruddy, K.; Tsang, J.; Cardoso, F. Breast cancer. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2019, 5, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sun, Y.S.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, Z.N.; Xu, F.; Lu, H.J.; Zhu, Z.Y.; Shi, W.; Jiang, J.; Yao, P.P.; Zhu, H.P. Risk Factors and Preventions of Breast Cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 13, 1387–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Howell, A.; Anderson, A.S.; Clarke, R.B.; Duffy, S.W.; Evans, D.G.; Garcia-Closas, M.; Gescher, A.J.; Key, T.J.; Saxton, J.M.; Harvie, M.N. Risk determination and prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014, 16, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Winters, S.; Martin, C.; Murphy, D.; Shokar, N.K. Breast Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention, and Screening. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2017, 151, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Huh, S.J.; Oh, H.; Peterson, M.A.; Almendro, V.; Hu, R.; Bowden, M.; Lis, R.L.; Cotter, M.B.; Loda, M.; Barry, W.T.; et al. The Proliferative Activity of Mammary Epithelial Cells in Normal Tissue Predicts Breast Cancer Risk in Premenopausal Women. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 1926–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Brisken, C.; O’Malley, B. Hormone action in the mammary gland. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a003178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bleach, R.; McIlroy, M. The Divergent Function of Androgen Receptor in Breast Cancer; Analysis of Steroid Mediators and Tumor Intracrinology. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goldenberg, I.S. Testosterone Propionate Therapy in Breast Cancer. JAMA 1964, 188, 1069–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kennedy, B.J. Fluoxymesterone therapy in advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1958, 259, 673–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Garay, J.P.; Park, B.H. Androgen receptor as a targeted therapy for breast cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2012, 2, 434–445. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cole, M.P.; Jones, C.T.; Todd, I.D. A new anti-oestrogenic agent in late breast cancer. An early clinical appraisal of ICI46474. Br. J. Cancer 1971, 25, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Council on Drugs; Subcommittee on Breast and Genital Cancer; Committee on Research; American Medical Association (AMA). Androgens and estrogens in the treatment of disseminated mammary carcinoma—Retrospective study of 944 patients. JAMA 1960, 172, 1271–1283. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tsang, J.Y.; Ni, Y.B.; Chan, S.K.; Shao, M.M.; Law, B.K.; Tan, P.H.; Tse, G.M. Androgen receptor expression shows distinctive significance in ER positive and negative breast cancers. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014, 21, 2218–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Park, S.; Koo, J.; Park, H.S.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, S.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Park, B.W.; Lee, K.S. Expression of androgen receptors in primary breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2010, 21, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ricciardelli, C.; Bianco-Miotto, T.; Jindal, S.; Butler, L.M.; Leung, S.; McNeil, C.M.; O’Toole, S.A.; Ebrahimie, E.; Millar, E.K.A.; Sakko, A.J.; et al. The Magnitude of Androgen Receptor Positivity in Breast Cancer Is Critical for Reliable Prediction of Disease Outcome. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 2328–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jiang, H.S.; Kuang, X.Y.; Sun, W.L.; Xu, Y.; Zheng, Y.Z.; Liu, Y.R.; Lang, G.T.; Qiao, F.; Hu, X.; Shao, Z.M. Androgen receptor expression predicts different clinical outcomes for breast cancer patients stratified by hormone receptor status. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 41285–41293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hickey, T.E.; Selth, L.A.; Chia, K.M.; Laven-Law, G.; Milioli, H.H.; Roden, D.; Jindal, S.; Hui, M.; Finlay-Schultz, J.; Ebrahimie, E.; et al. The androgen receptor is a tumor suppressor in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ando, S.; De Amicis, F.; Rago, V.; Carpino, A.; Maggiolini, M.; Panno, M.L.; Lanzino, M. Breast cancer: From estrogen to androgen receptor. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2002, 193, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lanzino, M.; Sisci, D.; Morelli, C.; Garofalo, C.; Catalano, S.; Casaburi, I.; Capparelli, C.; Giordano, C.; Giordano, F.; Maggiolini, M.; et al. Inhibition of cyclin D1 expression by androgen receptor in breast cancer cells—Identification of a novel androgen response element. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 5351–5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lanzino, M.; Maris, P.; Sirianni, R.; Barone, I.; Casaburi, I.; Chimento, A.; Giordano, C.; Morelli, C.; Sisci, D.; Rizza, P.; et al. DAX-1, as an androgen-target gene, inhibits aromatase expression: A novel mechanism blocking estrogen-dependent breast cancer cell proliferation. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. De Amicis, F.; Chiodo, C.; Morelli, C.; Casaburi, I.; Marsico, S.; Bruno, R.; Sisci, D.; Ando, S.; Lanzino, M. AIB1 sequestration by androgen receptor inhibits estrogen-dependent cyclin D1 expression in breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cops, E.J.; Bianco-Miotto, T.; Moore, N.L.; Clarke, C.L.; Birrell, S.N.; Butler, L.M.; Tilley, W.D. Antiproliferative actions of the synthetic androgen, mibolerone, in breast cancer cells are mediated by both androgen and progesterone receptors. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 110, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liao, D.J.; Dickson, R.B. Roles of androgens in the development, growth, and carcinogenesis of the mammary gland. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 80, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Peters, A.A.; Buchanan, G.; Ricciardelli, C.; Bianco-Miotto, T.; Centenera, M.M.; Harris, J.M.; Jindal, S.; Segara, D.; Jia, L.; Moore, N.L.; et al. Androgen receptor inhibits estrogen receptor-alpha activity and is prognostic in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 6131–6140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Overmoyer, B.; Sanz-Altamira, P.; Taylor, R.P.; Hancock, M.L.; Dalton, J.T.; Johnston, M.A.; Steiner, M.S. Enobosarm: A targeted therapy for metastatic, androgen receptor positive, breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, R.; Dawood, S.; Holmes, M.D.; Collins, L.C.; Schnitt, S.J.; Cole, K.; Marotti, J.D.; Hankinson, S.E.; Colditz, G.A.; Tamimi, R.M. Androgen receptor expression and breast cancer survival in postmenopausal women. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 1867–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sutton, L.M.; Cao, D.; Sarode, V.; Molberg, K.H.; Torgbe, K.; Haley, B.; Peng, Y. Decreased androgen receptor expression is associated with distant metastases in patients with androgen receptor-expressing triple-negative breast carcinoma. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2012, 138, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, X.; Petrossian, K.; Huang, M.J.; Saeki, K.; Kanaya, N.; Chang, G.; Somlo, G.; Chen, S. Functional characterization of androgen receptor in two patient-derived xenograft models of triple negative breast cancer. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2021, 206, 105791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Y.; Romigh, T.; He, X.; Tan, M.H.; Orloff, M.S.; Silverman, R.H.; Heston, W.D.; Eng, C. Differential regulation of PTEN expression by androgen receptor in prostate and breast cancers. Oncogene 2011, 30, 4327–4338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wang, Y.; He, X.; Yu, Q.; Eng, C. Androgen receptor-induced tumor suppressor, KLLN, inhibits breast cancer growth and transcriptionally activates p53/p73-mediated apoptosis in breast carcinomas. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 2263–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Hickey, T.E.; Robinson, J.L.; Carroll, J.S.; Tilley, W.D. Minireview: The androgen receptor in breast tissues: Growth inhibitor, tumor suppressor, oncogene? Mol. Endocrinol. 2012, 26, 1252–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fioretti, F.M.; Sita-Lumsden, A.; Bevan, C.L.; Brooke, G.N. Revising the role of the androgen receptor in breast cancer. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2014, 52, R257–R265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhu, A.; Li, Y.; Song, W.; Xu, Y.; Yang, F.; Zhang, W.; Yin, Y.; Guan, X. Antiproliferative Effect of Androgen Receptor Inhibition in Mesenchymal Stem-Like Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 38, 1003–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Giovannelli, P.; Di Donato, M.; Auricchio, F.; Castoria, G.; Migliaccio, A. Androgens Induce Invasiveness of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells through AR/Src/PI3-K Complex Assembly. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ahram, M.; Bawadi, R.; Abdullah, M.S.; Alsafadi, D.B.; Abaza, H.; Abdallah, S.; Mustafa, E. Involvement of beta-catenin in Androgen-induced Mesenchymal Transition of Breast MDA-MB-453 Cancer Cells. Endocr. Res. 2021, 46, 114–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chia, K.; O’Brien, M.; Brown, M.; Lim, E. Targeting the androgen receptor in breast cancer. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 17, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cochrane, D.R.; Bernales, S.; Jacobsen, B.M.; Cittelly, D.M.; Howe, E.N.; D’Amato, N.C.; Spoelstra, N.S.; Edgerton, S.M.; Jean, A.; Guerrero, J.; et al. Role of the androgen receptor in breast cancer and preclinical analysis of enzalutamide. Breast Cancer Res. 2014, 16, R7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Ni, M.; Chen, Y.; Lim, E.; Wimberly, H.; Bailey, S.T.; Imai, Y.; Rimm, D.L.; Liu, X.S.; Brown, M. Targeting androgen receptor in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2011, 20, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Barton, V.N.; D’Amato, N.C.; Gordon, M.A.; Lind, H.T.; Spoelstra, N.S.; Babbs, B.L.; Heinz, R.E.; Elias, A.; Jedlicka, P.; Jacobsen, B.M.; et al. Multiple molecular subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer critically rely on androgen receptor and respond to enzalutamide in vivo. Mol. Cancer 2015, 14, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Michmerhuizen, A.R.; Spratt, D.E.; Pierce, L.J.; Speers, C.W. Are we there yet? Understanding androgen receptor signaling in breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020, 6, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tarulli, G.A.; Laven-Law, G.; Shehata, M.; Walters, K.A.; Denis, I.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Handelsman, D.J.; Dean, N.R.; Tilley, W.D.; Hickey, T.E. Androgen Receptor Signalling Promotes a Luminal Phenotype in Mammary Epithelial Cells. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 2019, 24, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nguyen, Q.H.; Pervolarakis, N.; Blake, K.; Ma, D.; Davis, R.T.; James, N.; Phung, A.T.; Willey, E.; Kumar, R.; Jabart, E.; et al. Profiling human breast epithelial cells using single cell RNA sequencing identifies cell diversity. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Clarke, R.B.; Howell, A.; Potten, C.S.; Anderson, E. Dissociation between steroid receptor expression and cell proliferation in the human breast. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 4987–4991. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, F.; Dohogne, Z.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Soibam, B. Predictors of breast cancer cell types and their prognostic power in breast cancer patients. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Tarulli, G.A.; Butler, L.M.; Tilley, W.D.; Hickey, T.E. Bringing androgens up a NOTCH in breast cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2014, 21, T183–T202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Bach, K.; Pensa, S.; Grzelak, M.; Hadfield, J.; Adams, D.J.; Marioni, J.C.; Khaled, W.T. Differentiation dynamics of mammary epithelial cells revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sflomos, G.; Dormoy, V.; Metsalu, T.; Jeitziner, R.; Battista, L.; Scabia, V.; Raffoul, W.; Delaloye, J.F.; Treboux, A.; Fiche, M.; et al. A Preclinical Model for ERalpha-Positive Breast Cancer Points to the Epithelial Microenvironment as Determinant of Luminal Phenotype and Hormone Response. Cancer Cell 2016, 29, 407–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Blakemore, J.; Naftolin, F. Aromatase: Contributions to Physiology and Disease in Women and Men. Physiology 2016, 31, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lanigan, F.; O’Connor, D.; Martin, F.; Gallagher, W.M. Molecular links between mammary gland development and breast cancer. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2007, 64, 3159–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gao, Y.R.; Walters, K.A.; Desai, R.; Zhou, H.; Handelsman, D.J.; Simanainen, U. Androgen receptor inactivation resulted in acceleration in pubertal mammary gland growth, upregulation of ERalpha expression, and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in female mice. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 4951–4963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Yeh, S.; Hu, Y.C.; Wang, P.H.; Xie, C.; Xu, Q.; Tsai, M.Y.; Dong, Z.; Wang, R.S.; Lee, T.H.; Chang, C. Abnormal mammary gland development and growth retardation in female mice and MCF7 breast cancer cells lacking androgen receptor. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 1899–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bulun, S.E.; Fang, Z.J.; Gurates, B.; Tamura, M.; Yilmaz, B.; Amin, S.; Yang, S.J. Arornatase in health and disease. Endocrinologist 2003, 13, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Melo, K.F.S.; Mendonca, B.B.; Billerbeck, A.E.C.; Costa, E.M.F.; Inacio, M.; Silva, F.A.Q.; Leal, A.M.O.; Latronico, A.C.; Arnhold, I.J.P. Clinical, hormonal, behavioral, and genetic characteristics of androgen insensitivity syndrome in a Brazilian cohort: Five novel mutations in the androgen receptor gene. J. Clin. Endocr. Metab. 2003, 88, 3241–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Karagiannis, A.; Harsoulis, F. Gonadal dysfunction in systemic diseases. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2005, 152, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sansone, A.; Romanelli, F.; Sansone, M.; Lenzi, A.; Di Luigi, L. Gynecomastia and hormones. Endocrine 2017, 55, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Secreto, G.; Girombelli, A.; Krogh, V. Androgen excess in breast cancer development: Implications for prevention and treatment. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2019, 26, R81–R94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhou, J.; Ng, S.; Adesanya-Famuiya, O.; Anderson, K.; Bondy, C.A. Testosterone inhibits estrogen-induced mammary epithelial proliferation and suppresses estrogen receptor expression. FASEB J. 2000, 14, 1725–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Clarke, R.B.; Anderson, E.; Howell, A. Steroid receptors in human breast cancer. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 15, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schippinger, W.; Regitnig, P.; Dandachi, N.; Wernecke, K.D.; Bauernhofer, T.; Samonigg, H.; Moinfar, F. Evaluation of the prognostic significance of androgen receptor expression in metastatic breast cancer. Virchows Arch. 2006, 449, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kraby, M.R.; Valla, M.; Opdahl, S.; Haugen, O.A.; Sawicka, J.E.; Engstrom, M.J.; Bofin, A.M. The prognostic value of androgen receptors in breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2018, 172, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Chamberlain, N.L.; Driver, E.D.; Miesfeld, R.L. The length and location of CAG trinucleotide repeats in the androgen receptor N-terminal domain affect transactivation function. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 3181–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Esteban, E.; Rodon, N.; Via, M.; Gonzalez-Perez, E.; Santamaria, J.; Dugoujon, J.M.; Chennawi, F.E.; Melhaoui, M.; Cherkaoui, M.; Vona, G.; et al. Androgen receptor CAG and GGC polymorphisms in Mediterraneans: Repeat dynamics and population relationships. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 51, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Hao, Y.; Montiel, R.; Li, B.; Huang, E.; Zeng, L.; Huang, Y. Association between androgen receptor gene CAG repeat polymorphism and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2010, 124, 815–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. La Spada, A.R.; Wilson, E.M.; Lubahn, D.B.; Harding, A.E.; Fischbeck, K.H. Androgen receptor gene mutations in X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Nature 1991, 352, 77–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Spurdle, A.B.; Antoniou, A.C.; Duffy, D.L.; Pandeya, N.; Kelemen, L.; Chen, X.; Peock, S.; Cook, M.R.; Smith, P.L.; Purdie, D.M.; et al. The androgen receptor CAG repeat polymorphism and modification of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7, R176–R183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Weng, H.; Li, S.; Huang, J.-Y.; He, Z.-Q.; Meng, X.-Y.; Cao, Y.; Fang, C.; Zeng, X.-T. Androgen receptor gene polymorphisms and risk of prostate cancer: A meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Haiman, C.A.; Brown, M.; Hankinson, S.E.; Spiegelman, D.; Colditz, G.A.; Willett, W.C.; Kantoff, P.W.; Hunter, D.J. The androgen receptor CAG repeat polymorphism and risk of breast cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 1045–1049. [Google Scholar]
  69. Gonzalez, A.; Javier Dorta, F.; Rodriguez, G.; Brito, B.; Rodriguez, M.A.; Cabrera, A.; Diaz-Chico, J.C.; Reyes, R.; Aguirre-Jaime, A.; Nicolas Diaz-Chico, B. Increased risk of breast cancer in women bearing a combination of large CAG and GGN repeats in the exon 1 of the androgen receptor gene. Eur. J. Cancer 2007, 43, 2373–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Mehdipour, P.; Pirouzpanah, S.; Kheirollahi, M.; Atri, M. Androgen receptor gene CAG repeat polymorphism and breast cancer risk in Iranian women: A case-control study. Breast J. 2011, 17, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Mao, Q.; Qiu, M.; Dong, G.; Xia, W.; Zhang, S.; Xu, Y.; Wang, J.; Rong, Y.; Xu, L.; Jiang, F. CAG repeat polymorphisms in the androgen receptor and breast cancer risk in women: A meta-analysis of 17 studies. OncoTargets Ther. 2015, 8, 2111–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Santagata, S.; Thakkar, A.; Ergonul, A.; Wang, B.; Woo, T.; Hu, R.; Harrell, J.C.; McNamara, G.; Schwede, M.; Culhane, A.C.; et al. Taxonomy of breast cancer based on normal cell phenotype predicts outcome. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 859–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Santisteban, M.; Reynolds, C.; Barr Fritcher, E.G.; Frost, M.H.; Vierkant, R.A.; Anderson, S.S.; Degnim, A.C.; Visscher, D.W.; Pankratz, V.S.; Hartmann, L.C. Ki67: A time-varying biomarker of risk of breast cancer in atypical hyperplasia. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2010, 121, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kensler, K.H.; Beca, F.; Baker, G.M.; Heng, Y.J.; Beck, A.H.; Schnitt, S.J.; Hazra, A.; Rosner, B.A.; Eliassen, A.H.; Hankinson, S.E.; et al. Androgen receptor expression in normal breast tissue and subsequent breast cancer risk. NPJ Breast Cancer 2018, 4, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lanzino, M.; De Amicis, F.; McPhaul, M.J.; Marsico, S.; Panno, M.L.; Ando, S. Endogenous coactivator ARA70 interacts with estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and modulates the functional ERalpha/androgen receptor interplay in MCF-7 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 20421–20430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Need, E.F.; Selth, L.A.; Harris, T.J.; Birrell, S.N.; Tilley, W.D.; Buchanan, G. Research resource: Interplay between the genomic and transcriptional networks of androgen receptor and estrogen receptor alpha in luminal breast cancer cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 2012, 26, 1941–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Yu, Z.; He, S.; Wang, D.; Patel, H.K.; Miller, C.P.; Brown, J.L.; Hattersley, G.; Saeh, J.C. Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator RAD140 Inhibits the Growth of Androgen/Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Models with a Distinct Mechanism of Action. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 7608–7620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Nappi, R.E.; Martini, E.; Terreno, E.; Albani, F.; Santamaria, V.; Tonani, S.; Chiovato, L.; Polatti, F. Management of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women: Current and emerging therapies. Int. J. Women’s Health 2010, 2, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Vegunta, S.; Kling, J.M.; Kapoor, E. Androgen Therapy in Women. J. Women’s Health 2020, 29, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Glaser, R.L.; York, A.E.; Dimitrakakis, C. Incidence of invasive breast cancer in women treated with testosterone implants: A prospective 10-year cohort study. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Donovitz, G.; Cotten, M. Breast Cancer Incidence Reduction in Women Treated with Subcutaneous Testosterone: Testosterone Therapy and Breast Cancer Incidence Study. Eur. J. Breast Health 2021, 17, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Gera, R.; Tayeh, S.; Chehade, H.E.; Mokbel, K. Does Transdermal Testosterone Increase the Risk of Developing Breast Cancer? A Systematic Review. Anticancer Res. 2018, 38, 6615–6620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Hofling, M.; Hirschberg, A.L.; Skoog, L.; Tani, E.; Hagerstrom, T.; von Schoultz, B. Testosterone inhibits estrogen/progestogen-induced breast cell proliferation in postmenopausal women. Menopause 2007, 14, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Eigeliene, N.; Elo, T.; Linhala, M.; Hurme, S.; Erkkola, R.; Harkonen, P. Androgens inhibit the stimulatory action of 17beta-estradiol on normal human breast tissue in explant cultures. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E1116–E1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Ochnik, A.M.; Moore, N.L.; Jankovic-Karasoulos, T.; Bianco-Miotto, T.; Ryan, N.K.; Thomas, M.R.; Birrell, S.N.; Butler, L.M.; Tilley, W.D.; Hickey, T.E. Antiandrogenic actions of medroxyprogesterone acetate on epithelial cells within normal human breast tissues cultured ex vivo. Menopause 2014, 21, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Shamseddin, M.; De Martino, F.; Constantin, C.; Scabia, V.; Lancelot, A.S.; Laszlo, C.; Ayyannan, A.; Battista, L.; Raffoul, W.; Gailloud-Matthieu, M.C.; et al. Contraceptive progestins with androgenic properties stimulate breast epithelial cell proliferation. EMBO Mol. Med. 2021, 13, e14314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tamimi, R.M.; Hankinson, S.E.; Chen, W.Y.; Rosner, B.; Colditz, G.A. Combined estrogen and testosterone use and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006, 166, 1483–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. De Blok, C.J.M.; Wiepjes, C.M.; Nota, N.M.; van Engelen, K.; Adank, M.A.; Dreijerink, K.M.A.; Barbe, E.; Konings, I.; den Heijer, M. Breast cancer risk in transgender people receiving hormone treatment: Nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. BMJ 2019, 365, l1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Irwig, M.S. Testosterone therapy for transgender men. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017, 5, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fundytus, A.; Saad, N.; Logie, N.; Roldan Urgoiti, G. Breast cancer in transgender female-to-male individuals: A case report of androgen receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast J. 2020, 26, 1007–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Light, M.; McFarlane, T.; Ives, A.; Shah, B.; Lim, E.; Grossmann, M.; Zajac, J.D.; Cheung, A.S. Testosterone therapy considerations in oestrogen, progesterone and androgen receptor-positive breast cancer in a transgender man. Clin. Endocrinol. 2020, 93, 355–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Nikolic, D.V.; Djordjevic, M.L.; Granic, M.; Nikolic, A.T.; Stanimirovic, V.V.; Zdravkovic, D.; Jelic, S. Importance of revealing a rare case of breast cancer in a female to male transsexual after bilateral mastectomy. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 10, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Tanini, S.; Fisher, A.D.; Meattini, I.; Bianchi, S.; Ristori, J.; Maggi, M.; Lo Russo, G. Testosterone and Breast Cancer in Transmen: Case Reports, Review of the Literature, and Clinical Observation. Clin. Breast Cancer 2019, 19, e271–e275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Elhassan, Y.S.; Idkowiak, J.; Smith, K.; Asia, M.; Gleeson, H.; Webster, R.; Arlt, W.; O’Reilly, M.W. Causes, Patterns, and Severity of Androgen Excess in 1205 Consecutively Recruited Women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 1214–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Secreto, G.; Zumoff, B. Role of androgen excess in the development of estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 3223–3228. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Houghton, L.C.; Knight, J.A.; Wei, Y.; Romeo, R.D.; Goldberg, M.; Andrulis, I.L.; Bradbury, A.R.; Buys, S.S.; Daly, M.B.; John, E.M.; et al. Association of Prepubertal and Adolescent Androgen Concentrations with Timing of Breast Development and Family History of Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e190083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Secreto, G.; Sieri, S.; Agnoli, C.; Grioni, S.; Muti, P.; Zumoff, B.; Sant, M.; Meneghini, E.; Krogh, V. A novel approach to breast cancer prevention: Reducing excessive ovarian androgen production in elderly women. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016, 158, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Endogenous, H.; Breast Cancer Collaborative, G.; Key, T.J.; Appleby, P.N.; Reeves, G.K.; Travis, R.C.; Alberg, A.J.; Barricarte, A.; Berrino, F.; Krogh, V.; et al. Sex hormones and risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women: A collaborative reanalysis of individual participant data from seven prospective studies. Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14, 1009–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A.; Afanasyeva, Y.; Kaaks, R.; Rinaldi, S.; Scarmo, S.; Liu, M.; Arslan, A.A.; Toniolo, P.; Shore, R.E.; Koenig, K.L. Premenopausal serum androgens and breast cancer risk: A nested case-control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012, 14, R32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Kaaks, R.; Tikk, K.; Sookthai, D.; Schock, H.; Johnson, T.; Tjonneland, A.; Olsen, A.; Overvad, K.; Clavel-Chapelon, F.; Dossus, L.; et al. Premenopausal serum sex hormone levels in relation to breast cancer risk, overall and by hormone receptor status—Results from the EPIC cohort. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 134, 1947–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Dorgan, J.F.; Longcope, C.; Stephenson, H.E., Jr.; Falk, R.T.; Miller, R.; Franz, C.; Kahle, L.; Campbell, W.S.; Tangrea, J.A.; Schatzkin, A. Relation of prediagnostic serum estrogen and androgen levels to breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1996, 5, 533–539. [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhang, X.; Tworoger, S.S.; Eliassen, A.H.; Hankinson, S.E. Postmenopausal plasma sex hormone levels and breast cancer risk over 20 years of follow-up. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2013, 137, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Dimitrakakis, C.; Zhou, J.; Bondy, C.A. Androgens and mammary growth and neoplasia. Fertil. Steril. 2002, 77 (Suppl. S4), S26–S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lee, O.; Heinz, R.E.; Ivancic, D.; Muzzio, M.; Chatterton, R.T.; Zalles, C.M.; Keeney, K.; Phan, B.; Liu, D.; Scholtens, D.; et al. Breast Hormone Concentrations in Random Fine-Needle Aspirates of Healthy Women Associate with Cytological Atypia and Gene Methylation. Cancer Prev Res. 2018, 11, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Chatterton, R.T.; Heinz, R.E.; Fought, A.J.; Ivancic, D.; Shappell, C.; Allu, S.; Gapstur, S.; Scholtens, D.M.; Gann, P.H.; Khan, S.A. Nipple Aspirate Fluid Hormone Concentrations and Breast Cancer Risk. Horm. Cancer 2016, 7, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Evans, D.G.; Howell, S.J.; Howell, A. Personalized prevention in high risk individuals: Managing hormones and beyond. Breast 2018, 39, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. McCormack, V.A.; dos Santos Silva, I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2006, 15, 1159–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Martin, L.J.; Boyd, N.F. Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: Hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res. 2008, 10, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Gabrielson, M.; Azam, S.; Hardell, E.; Holm, M.; Ubhayasekera, K.A.; Eriksson, M.; Backlund, M.; Bergquist, J.; Czene, K.; Hall, P. Hormonal determinants of mammographic density and density change. Breast Cancer Res. 2020, 22, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bertrand, K.A.; Eliassen, A.H.; Hankinson, S.E.; Rosner, B.A.; Tamimi, R.M. Circulating Hormones and Mammographic Density in Premenopausal Women. Horm. Cancer 2018, 9, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Lundstrom, E.; Carlstrom, K.; Naessen, S.; Soderqvist, G. Dehydroepiandrosterone and/or its metabolites: Possible androgen receptor antagonistic effects on digitized mammographic breast density in normal breast tissue of postmenopausal women. Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2018, 25, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chen, F.; Knecht, K.; Birzin, E.; Fisher, J.; Wilkinson, H.; Mojena, M.; Moreno, C.T.; Schmidt, A.; Harada, S.; Freedman, L.P.; et al. Direct agonist/antagonist functions of dehydroepiandrosterone. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 4568–4576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Rebbeck, T.R.; Kantoff, P.W.; Krithivas, K.; Neuhausen, S.; Blackwood, M.A.; Godwin, A.K.; Daly, M.B.; Narod, S.A.; Garber, J.E.; Lynch, H.T.; et al. Modification of BRCA1-associated breast cancer risk by the polymorphic androgen-receptor CAG repeat. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1999, 64, 1371–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Park, J.J.; Irvine, R.A.; Buchanan, G.; Koh, S.S.; Park, J.M.; Tilley, W.D.; Stallcup, M.R.; Press, M.F.; Coetzee, G.A. Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCAI) is a coactivator of the androgen receptor. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 5946–5949. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 23 00424 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of current evidences correlating AR expression within human normal epithelial cells and subsequent breast cancer risk.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of current evidences correlating AR expression within human normal epithelial cells and subsequent breast cancer risk.
Ijms 23 00424 g001
Table
Table 1. Current clinical trials (>100 participants) investigating the safety and the efficacy of AR agonists or antagonists in women affected by breast cancer (https://clinicaltrials.gov/, accessed on 22 July 2021).
Table 1. Current clinical trials (>100 participants) investigating the safety and the efficacy of AR agonists or antagonists in women affected by breast cancer (https://clinicaltrials.gov/, accessed on 22 July 2021).
IdentifierTitlePhaseTreatmentActivityDisease
NCT02463032A Phase 2 Open Label, Multi-Center, Multinational, Randomized, Parallel Design Study Investigating The Efficacy and Safety Of GTx-024 On Metastatic or Locally Advanced ER+/AR+ Breast Cancer (BC) in Postmenopausal Women2GTx-024Selective-AR modulatorER+ AR+ metastatic or locally advanced BC
NCT02007512A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in combination with exemestane in patients with advanced breast cancer that is estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive and her2-normal2Enzalutamide/
Exemestane/
Placebo		AR inhibitor/
Aromatase inhibitor		ER+ or PR+ and HER2 normal advanced BC
NCT01889238A phase 2, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study of the clinical activity and safety of enzalutamide in patients with advanced, androgen receptor-positive, triple-negative breast cancer2EnzalutamideAR inhibitorAR+ TNBCadvanced BC
NCT03650894A Phase II Study of Nivolumab Combined With Bicalutamide and Ipilimumab in Metastatic HER2-negative Breast Cancer2Nivolumab/
Ipilimumab/
Bicalutamide		anti-PD-1/
anit-CTLA4/
AR inhibitor		HER 2- metastatic or unresectable BC
NCT02091960A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Enzalutamide With Trastuzumab in Subjects With HER2+ AR+ Metastatic or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer2Enzalutamide/
Trastuzumab		AR inhibitor/
HER2 inhibitor		AR+ HER2+ metastatic or locally advanced BC
NCT00725374An Exploratory, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial to Investigate the Tissue Specific Effects of 2.5 mg Tibolone on Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women, in Particular on Breast Tissue Proliferation3Tibolone/
Placebo		Selective-ER modulatorBC
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiodo, C.; Morelli, C.; Cavaliere, F.; Sisci, D.; Lanzino, M. The Other Side of the Coin: May Androgens Have a Role in Breast Cancer Risk? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010424

AMA Style

Chiodo C, Morelli C, Cavaliere F, Sisci D, Lanzino M. The Other Side of the Coin: May Androgens Have a Role in Breast Cancer Risk? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(1):424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010424

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiodo, Chiara, Catia Morelli, Fabiola Cavaliere, Diego Sisci, and Marilena Lanzino. 2022. "The Other Side of the Coin: May Androgens Have a Role in Breast Cancer Risk?" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 1: 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010424

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop