Abstract
In recent years, social media has become part of our lives, even among children. From the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic period, media device and Internet access rapidly increased. Adolescents connected Internet alone, consulting social media, mostly Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. During “lockdown”, the Internet usage allowed communication with peers and the continuity activities such as school teaching. However, we have to keep in mind that media usage may be related to some adverse consequences especially in the most vulnerable people, such as the young. Aim of the review is to focus on risks correlated to social media use by children and adolescents, identifying spies of rising problems and engaging in preventive recommendations. The scoping review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, searching on PubMed the terms “social media” or “social network”, “health”, and “pediatrics”. Excluding articles not pertinent, we found 68 reports. Out of them, 19 were dealing with depression, 15 with diet, and 15 with psychological problems, which appeared to be the most reported risk of social media use. Other identified associated problems were sleep, addiction, anxiety, sex related issues, behavioral problems, body image, physical activity, online grooming, sight, headache, and dental caries. Public and medical awareness must rise over this topic and new prevention measures must be found, starting with health practitioners, caregivers, and websites/application developers. Pediatricians should be aware of the risks associated to a problematic social media use for the young’s health and identify sentinel signs in children as well as prevent negative outcomes in accordance with the family.
1. Introduction
Media device use is increasing year by year in Italy as well as in many other countries. An ISTAT report referred that in 2019, 85.8% of Italian adolescents aged 11–17 years regularly used smartphones, and over 72% accessed Internet via smartphones [1]. Almost 95% of Italian families with a child had a broadband internet connection [2]. Internet connection was mostly used to communicate with friends and to use social networks [1]. In 2020, COVID-19 pandemic represented one of the greatest disruptions for everybody’s everyday life, in Italy as well as all around the world. From the beginning of the pandemic period, media device and Internet access rapidly increased. In line, a 2021 CENSIS report revealed an even progressive increment of smartphone use by adolescents, which reached 95% [3]. In particular, the majority of adolescents (59%) admitted they use smartphone even more frequently than in the past with a daily use of more than 3 h in 46% of cases. Adolescents connected Internet alone (59%), consulting social media, mostly Instagram (72%), TikTok (62%), and YouTube (58%) [4]. In this context, social interaction over the Internet or simply social network consulting may play an important part in the lives of many young people, influencing them and their relationship with self-esteem and well-being [5]. Not being guided and monitored in Internet fruition, the young may be exposed to several risks, including cyberbullying which affects 7% of children aged 11–13 years and 5.2% of 14–17 years old adolescents or stalking which affects more than 600 minors in Italy. On social media, the young are more vulnerable and may display risk behavior, including pertaining substance abuse, sexual behaviors, or violence [6].
On the other hand, media and social networks are, actually, present in almost any house and are considered a great resource for anybody, including children and adolescents. Especially during “lockdown”, the Internet usage allowed communication with peers and the continuity activities such as school teaching. Social media services enable various form of communication verbally or visually by internet-based networking, bringing people together, facilitating instant connection and interaction, such as a like or a comment on something [7]. There was also a “school” use of smartphones and social media during lockdown which represented a tool of information and education [8].
In line, websites and applications that enable users to create and share content or to participate in social networking may be currently use as a definition of a social media. Facebook launched in 2004 and Twitter in 2006 were the first social media introduced, rapidly followed by many others [9]. Actually, Facebook with 2.9 billion monthly active users, YouTube with 2 billion, Instagram with 1.5 billion, and TikTok with 1 billion are the most accessed social media in the world [10]. As social media are spreading in every day’s life, regulatory models are required to address a broad range of challenges social media pose to the community, including privacy and protection of sensitive data.
Media usage is related to some adverse consequences especially in the most vulnerable people. The health emergency had a strong impact on the mental and psychological health of adolescents causing changing in their routine and daily activities. Forced isolation increased anxiety and stress especially in the most fragile individuals, such as children and adolescents, leading to a change in habitual lifestyles. The greatest risk was that of taking refuge in excessive use of smartphones, electronic devices, and social networks, running into a “digital overdose” [11].
A recent survey conducted by the Italian Society of Pediatrics in collaboration with State Police and Skuola.net investigated the relationship with media devices in times of pandemic, investigating the habits of adolescents on the use of media and social networks, underlined that 15% of them declared they “cannot stay without” their own media device [1].
The aim of the review is to focus on risks correlated to social media use by the young, identifying spies of rising problems, and engaging in preventive recommendations.
2. Materials and Methods
This scoping review has been conducted by The Italian Pediatric Society Scientific Communication Group in order to provide an overview of a complex research area. The aim is reviewing international literature disguising about social media and their effect on the pediatric age, including minors less than 18 years, to underline possible risks found so far, identifying the signs of a dangerous use, and to eventually give new recommendation based on these findings.
We define a risk as the possibility of something unfavorable happens, as an effect or an implication of social media usage and which may potentially affect human health. This scoping review has been performed according to the PRISMA Extension guidelines for Scoping Reviews [12].
An electronic search was undertaken on PubMed database on 23 January 2022. To avoid missing results that may be of note for our revision study, constructing our search in PubMed, we used all of the important concepts from our basic clinical question, avoiding unnecessary filters.
So, the search terms “social media”, “health”, and “pediatrics” in text or title/abstract were used, with the time span set as “all years”. The search on the selected database has produced n 651 among articles and reviews. Another research was made using “social network”, “health” and “pediatrics” as search terms in text or title/abstract, with the time span always set as “all years”. It resulted in 354 articles/reviews.
The two research were downloaded from PubMed and then uploaded to the web application “Rayyan” [13], a website used to screen and analyze articles, specific for writing reviews. Additional articles for potential inclusion were identified in a second stage by hand searching the reference lists in relevant articles.
Studies were considered eligible for this scoping review if they met the following inclusion criteria:
- -
- Full-length articles or reviews.
- -
- Pertaining to children and adolescents up to 18 years old.
- -
- Negative impact on a pediatric population using social media.
- -
- Social media meant as forms of electronic communication.
The exclusion criteria were:
- -
- Reports not in English.
- -
- Duplications.
- -
- Not pertinent field of investigation (e.g., use of the social media to promote healthcare, benefits of social media, social media used to debate on health-related issues, and social network meant as real social interactions).
- -
- The population analyzed was adult (>18 years).
- -
- The population had previous pathologies.
To reduce errors and bias, two researchers independently, two researchers conducted the screening process to identify articles that met all inclusion criteria. Using the web application “Rayyan” [13], duplicates were removed, then titles and abstracts were analyzed to exclude distinctly irrelevant articles. Finally, the eligibility of the articles was confirmed by evaluating the full text. Disagreements regarding inclusion/exclusion were settled by discussion between the researchers.
Relevant articles were selected on the web application “Rayyan” and grouped together based on the issue they were dealing with. Afterwards, data were compiled in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to calculate frequencies and percentages of the problems related to social media use, found in the research.
3. Results
All the 1005 documents have been reviewed for relevance and eligibility.
As shown in the Figure 1, through the help of the web application “Rayyan” [13] we removed before screening 9 duplicates, 25 foreign language works, and 49 publications dated before 2004. We excluded paper published before 2004, the year of Facebook foundation, because before that year “social networks” was a term used to mean “social interactions in real life”, as they were not pertinent to our research.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of the selection process. * automation tools were used: 6 records were excluded by automation tools and 3 were excluded by authors. Twenty-five records were excluded because they were not written in English, these were identified using automation tools, but then checked by authors. ** 49 records were removed because they were published before 2004, and no social network existed before that year.
According to PRISMA guidelines [12], of the 922 works identified, all abstracts were analyzed, and 832 records were excluded. Around 66% of the excluded records were dealing with other topics (e.g., vaccines, promoting health by social media, social networks meant as real social interactions, and social lockdown during SARS-CoV-2 period), a percentage of 28% of the records corresponded to a wrong population: mostly parents, pregnant women, young adults, or children with pathologies (e.g., ADHD). About 6% of the excluded studies used social media tools to recruit people in their studies or to deliver questionnaires.
In conclusion, 90 were the records to be analyzed reading their full-length articles. The whole article of four of them has not been found (“reports not retrieved”), arriving at 86 reports assessed for eligibility. Figure 1 presents the flow chart of the selection process, adapted from PRISMA guideline [14].
Of the 86 reports attained, we read the whole length articles and then excluded 20 studies.
Of these twenty, 6 were excluded because not leading to any conclusion; 13 were dealing with wrong topics, such as: doctors’ social media knowledge; social lock down during the pandemic; social media marketing; underage and privacy; survey on how social media is perceived by adolescents; time consumed on social media; predictor factors of problematic social media use. Finally, one was not included because it focused on parents and families.
Searching through the cited studies in the included reports, two reviews which were not initially included in the research were added.
With 68 included reports analyzed, there were 15 reviews; of these two were systematic reviews, one validation study, and one editorial. Cross-sectional studies and longitudinal studies have been considered, eight and nine, respectively.
Many articles reported more than one issue correlated to social media use. The most frequent problems involved mental health, followed by diet and weight problems. Table 1 shows the problematic topics found to be related to social media use in children and adolescents and their prevalence, expressed as percentage, over the 68 reports analyzed.
Table 1.
Social media health related problems in a pediatric population. This table shows the issues found in this scoping review. Depression was argued in 19 reports, being the main topic found (27.9% of the whole study). Diet associated problems were discussed in 15 reports, cyberbullying in 15, psychological problems in 14, sleep related problems in 13, addiction in 10, anxiety in 10, sex related problems in 9, behavioral problems in 7, body images distortion in 6, reduced physical activity and related problems has been reported in 5 reports, online grooming in 3 reports, sight problems in 3, also headache in 3, and dental caries in total of 2 articles.
The most frequent problems found are related to mental health: depression, anxiety, and addiction.
Other problems are related to sleep, diet and nutrition, cyberbullying, psychological aspects, behavioral problems, sex, body image perception, physical activity, online grooming, sight, headache, and dental caries.
4. Discussion
4.1. Social Media and Depression
We identified 19 publications reporting a relationship between social media use and depression [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Table 2 summarized the main finding regarding each article. Out of them, four investigated the impact of COVID 19 pandemic on both social media use and depression (Table 2).
Table 2.
Social media and depression.
4.1.1. Before COVID-19 Pandemic
Investigating the impact of social media on adolescents’ wellbeing is a priority due to a progressive increase in mental health problems or addiction and access to Emergency Department [15]. As Chiu and Rutter stated, there is a positive relationship between internalizing symptoms, such as depression and anxiety, and social media use [15,16]. Depression is connected to a rapidly increased of digital communication and virtual spaces, which substitute face-to-face contact by excessive smartphone use and online chatting. The more time adolescents spend on social device the higher levels of depression are found out. In this sense, social media are representing a risk factor for depression in the young. Depression, anxiety, and behavioral disorders are among the leading causes of illness and disability among adolescents [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Key findings which correlate to depression regarding social media exposure are repeated activities such as checking messages, investment, and addition [23]. The findings were similar all over the world.
For example, in Sweden, spending more than 2 h on social media was associated with higher odds of feeling [20]. In Egypt, as well, students who have problematic Internet use, have higher psychiatric comorbidities, such as depression, anxiety, and suicidal tendency [24].
Social media addiction and more precisely Facebook addiction was linked not only to depression but even to dysthymia, so that the expression “Facebook depression” was coined to identify a relationship between depression and social networking activity [15,25,26]. Individuals suffering from Facebook depression may be at an increased risk of social isolation and may be more vulnerable to drugs or behavioral problems [26].
Internet penetrance and connectivity are also connected to cyberbullying which can lead to depression and suicidality [27,28,29].
On the other side, physical activity may decrease depression and anxiety, potentially protecting the young against the harmful effect of social media abuse [16].
At last, even if a positive correlation between internalizing symptoms and media use device is noted, Hoge states that there is also evidence that social media communication may improve mood and promote health strategies in some occasions [18].
Finally, even if evidence revealed that social media use is linked to poor mental health, the relationship between social media and depression in adolescents is still to be completely understood. It is still unclear whether social media use leads to more depression or if these depressive symptoms cause individuals to seek out more social media, which could feed into a vicious cycle [16]. Keles’s conclusion as well suggest defining the relationship between internalizing symptoms and social media use as an association and not a causative effect [23].
4.1.2. After COVID 19 Pandemic
During COVID-19 pandemic, the state of emergency and social isolation determined an increase in time on screen not only as a source of online education, but to continuously access social media. According to recent data, a percentage of 48% of adolescents spent a mean of 5 h per day on social media and 12% spent more than 10 h. Moreover, with that increase in virtual time depression arose [30].
The degree of social media usage in children is a significant predictor of depression, which increases with each additional hour of social media use [31].
During the pandemic, depressive symptoms may have been reactive to the context of being afraid of the virus and necessitating social isolation [32].
However, in this peculiar period, schoolchildren who increased time spent on either smartphones, social media, or gaming had significantly elevated psychological distress, such as depressive symptoms, than those with decreased time spent on these internet-related activities [33].
4.2. Social Media and Diet
Out of the reports, 15 dealt with the association of social media use and diet [21,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. The problems were related to junk food marketing (9 reports) [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41] obesity (4 reports) [21,41,42,43], unhealthy eating behaviors (3 reports) [44,45,46], and alcohol marketing (2 reports) [21,47]. In Table 3 the retrieved articles dealing with social media and diet, and their major findings are presented (Table 3).
Table 3.
Social media and diet.
4.2.1. Before COVID-19 Pandemic
Junk Food Marketing
Reports found that children are exposed to the marketing of unhealthy foods on social media and to their persuasive techniques. Digital marketing represents a major threat for children and adolescents in Mexico, because of its persuasive techniques. Cola and soft drinks, sweetened juices and in general the so-called junk food have high followers on Facebook and Twitter. [34]. This may cause an increase in children’s immediate consumption of the promoted product, unhealthy behaviors and may led to obesity, as confirmed by several studies [34,35,36]. Reports agree on the youth major vulnerability to unhealthy food advertisement, including digital marketing, sponsored content, influencers, and persuasive design [34,35,36]. This contributes to the obesity epidemic [36].
Major social media platforms do not have comprehensive policies in place to restrict the marketing of unhealthy foods on their platforms [36,37]. Therefore, exposure to the marketing of unhealthy products, on social media may be considered a risk factor for related unhealthy behaviors.
Analysis of the advertising policies of the 16 largest social media platforms proved them ineffective in protecting children and adolescents from exposure to the digital marketing of unhealthy food [37].
Among social media, YouTube is particularly worrying considering the affinity of the young toward the platform. Unhealthy food advertisements predominate in YouTube content aimed towards children. In fact, analysis of advertisements encountered in YouTube videos targeted at children revealed that food and beverage ads appeared most frequently, with more than half of these promoting unhealthy foods [38].
As confirmed by an Irish study, adolescents are very attracted to junk food advertisements and are likely to share comments on their network: generalized linear mixed models showed that advertisements for unhealthy food evoked significantly more positive responses, compared to non-food and healthy food. Of all the advertising, they see in social media, they view unhealthy food advertising posts for longer [39]. This confirms the vulnerability of children towards ad and digital marketing.
Moreover, it has been demonstrated that adolescent heavy social media users (>3 h/day) are more willing to engage with food ads compared to light social media users, and are more willing to “like” Instagram food ads featuring many “likes” versus few “likes”, demonstrating the power of social norms in shaping behaviors. Adolescents interact with brands in ways that mimic interactions with friends on social media, which is concerning when brands promote unhealthy product. [40]. There is a need of more strict policies to limit digital marketing, which is becoming more and more intense, especially towards children and adolescents.
4.2.2. After COVID-19 Pandemic
During the COVID-19 pandemic, this phenomenon even increased. In fact, the combination of staying at home, online education and social media usage have all caused screen time to surge and the food industry has been quick to identify this change in their target audience and has intensified online advertising and focused on children. The COVID-19 experience led to an increase in risk and severity of inappropriate behavioral eating habits, affecting the health and weight [41].
4.2.3. Before COVID-19 Pandemic
Obesity
Social media is the first independent risk factor for obesity in primary school children and the second for high school students. In both primary school and high school models, children’s social media use has the highest impact on child’s BMI [42]. In addition, heavy media use during preschool years is associated with small but significant increases in BMI, especially if used ≥ 2 h of media per day [21].
4.2.4. After COVID-19 Pandemic
Obesity and social media correlated through junk food advertisements [41,43]. During COVID 19 pandemic poor quality food, energy-dense, and nutrient-poor products consumption increased, leading to the risk of overweight and obesity. The phenomenon has been called “Covibesity” [41].
4.3. Unhealthy Eating Behavior
Some social media contents promote pro-anorexia messages [44,45,46]. These messages are no longer limited to websites that can be easily monitored, but instead have been transferred to constantly changing media such as Snapchat, Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, and Tumblr. Consequently, pro-eating disorder content has become more easily accessible by the users. Pro-anorexia website use is correlated with a higher drive for thinness, lower evaluations of their appearance, and higher levels of perfectionism, and all correlates with eating disturbances [44,46].
In detail, there is a real bombardment of unhealthy messages on media promoting low-nutrition aliments and sugar-sweetened drinks [45].
It is likely that the suboptimal quality of online information on social media platform contributes to the development of unhealthy eating attitudes and behaviors in young adolescent internet users seeking nutritional information. They look for nutritional information on internet sources such as commercial websites or social media in order to lose weight. In this occasion, they may be exposed to higher risk of eating disorders due to the high quantity of misinformation. Moreover, they may find dangerous methods to rapidly lose weight with possible harm for their health [46].
Literature agrees on the risk of time spent on social media as well as on the poor quality and reliability of weight loss information on media [44,45,46].
4.4. Alcohol Marketing
Adolescents identify drinking brands to peculiar images of ideal adults. Brands know well this underlying psychological mechanism and promote that identity adolescents seek, with specific advertisement on social media [47].
Studies have shown that exposure to alcohol in TV or movies is associated with initiation of this behavior. The major alcohol brands have a strong advertising presence on social media, including Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. Several studies underlined risky health behaviors, such as illegal alcohol use or overuse. Evidence suggests that peer viewers of this content are likely to consider these behaviors as normative and desirable. Therefore, targeted advertising via social media has a significant effect on adolescent behavior [21].
4.5. Social Media and Cyberbullying
We identified 15 publications reporting a relationship between social media use and cyberbullying [21,22,25,26,27,28,29,45,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. Table 4 summarized the main finding regarding each article (Table 4).
Table 4.
Social media and cyberbullying.
Cyberbullying may be defined as any behavior performed through electronic or digital media by individuals or groups that repeatedly communicate hostile or aggressive messages intended to inflict harm or discomfort on others. Compared to bullying, cyberbullying may be even more dangerous as victims can be reached anytime and in any place. Moreover, anonymity amplifies aggression as the perpetrator feels out of reach.
Moreover, the ability to hide behind fake names provides bullies the opportunity to communicate in content and language they would not use in front of people [26,48,49]. As confirmed by Shah et al., the anonymity of cyberbullying increases the risk for inappropriate behaviors among adolescents [50].
In literature, cyberbullying has been identified in phone calls, text messages, pictures/video clips, emails, and messaging apps. This is a great public health concern: in Italy, 2015 ISTAT data showed that 19.8% of 11–17 years old internet users report being cyberbullied [49].
This phenomenon is increasing. In fact, the number of adolescents being cyberbullied at least once in their life increased from 20.8% in 2010 to 33.8% in 2016 [50].
Victims of bullies exhibit increased depressive symptoms, anxiety, internalizing behaviors, externalizing behaviors, and greater academic distractions [21,22,25,27,28,29,51].
Cyberbullying has been associated with higher risks of depression, paranoia, anxiety, and suicide than the traditional form of bullying [21,22]. According to a metanalysis of 34 studies, traditional bullying increased suicide ideation by a factor of 2.16, whereas cyberbullying increased it by a factor of 3.12 [39].
In adolescence, social media intense or problematic use and frequent online contact with strangers are all independently associated with cyberbullying [45,52,53]. In this contest, social media represent a risk factor for cyberbullying and for inappropriate behavior related to it. In fact, problematic social media use is an important driver of cyberbullying victimization and perpetration, especially among girls [50,53]. The highest percentage is observed in adolescents, aged 13 to 15 years as suggested by literature reviews and, in particular, by Marengo and Uludasdemir [53,54]. However, Marengo also suggests that in presence of social support, the phenomenon is attenuated [53].
Moreover, having daily access to the Internet and the sharing of gender on social media increased the likelihood of cyber victimization among adolescents aged 12–17 years. Those who use Tumblr and Snapchat were found to become victims even more frequently [54].
4.6. Psychological Problems and Social Media
We identified 14 publications reporting a relationship between social media use and psychological problems [17,23,33,45,49,52,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. Table 5 summarized the main finding regarding each article (Table 5).
Table 5.
Social media and psychological problems.
4.6.1. Before COVID-19 Pandemic
A high use of screen device has been correlated to a low psychological well-being among children and adolescents, especially among females [17].
For examples, in Canadians adolescents, the prevalence of loneliness was higher for daily computer-mediated communication users than non-daily users [55]. As well as for cyberbullying, adolescents may benefit from social support, family communication, and interaction to ameliorate feelings of loneliness [53,55]. Boer et al. confirmed that intense user reported more frequent psychological complaints than non-intense user as well as less family and friend support [56]. In line with this finding, in Lithuania a problematic social media use has been associated with two times higher odds for lower life satisfaction [57].
Moreover, an intense social media use correlated to either low school well-being and reduced social well-being (decreased family and friends support and relations) [56].
A relationship between poor life satisfaction, problematic social media use, and lack of social support was found not only in adolescents, but also in children [52,57,58,59,60].
Social media use is also correlated with conduct and emotional problems, attention deficit, peer problems, school impairments, and psychological distress [23,45,61,62].
Social networks and media device use correlate to low academic outcomes, reduced concentration, and procrastination. In fact, problematic smartphone use correlates to a surface approach to learning rather than to a deep approach, leading to reduced creativity, organization skills, own thinking, and comprehension of information [49].
4.6.2. After COVID-19 Pandemic
During this COVID-19 pandemic, primary school children reported significantly higher psychological distress than the period prior to the COVID-19 outbreak. Studies showed that schoolchildren who increased time spent on either smartphones, social media, or gaming had significantly elevated psychological distress than those with decreased time spent on these internet-related activities [33].
4.7. Social Media and Sleep
Extended use of digital media screen time correlates with sleep impairment [18,21,22,26,31,43,47,49,57,61,63,64,65]. Table 6 summarizes the evidence in literature (Table 6). Exposure to screen-based devices, online social networking sites, and video-sharing platforms is significantly associated with sleep-onset difficulties in adolescents [18,49]. Findings from a meta-analysis of 20 cross-sectional studies show 53% higher odds of poor sleep quality among adolescents with consistent bedtime media use [63]. Moreover, the use of computers and smartphones among adolescents is associated with daytime sleepiness and fatigue, shorter sleep duration, later bedtime, and unfavorable changes in sleep habits over time [22]. Smartphones may be easily carried around and even taken to bed. Several sleep disorders correlate to both overall and night phone use among adolescents. It has been demonstrated that social media addiction in school students decreases students’ sleep efficiency [61]. Use of cellphones, particularly for nighttime texting, and consulting social media were associated with insufficient sleep [63]. A 5 or more hours daily of media devices use has been related to a higher risk of sleep problems when compared to a 1 h use daily [49]. This finding is confirmed by Buda who correlates problematic social media with about two times higher odds for a bad sleep quality [57]. Varghese as well associated social media use with sleep difficulties. Furthermore, YouTube user had two-times higher odds for sleep-onset difficulties [63].
Table 6.
Social media and sleep.
In addition, it seems that girls suffer more than boys from these sleep problems [57].
Sleeping problems, especially sleep duration, have been then associated with time spent on screen, problematic behaviors, and higher internalizing and externalizing symptoms [64].
Even among children, there is a problem with extended use of social media sites, which result in sleep deprivation due to delayed bedtimes and reduced total sleep duration and quality of rest [31,65]. The report by Hadjipanayis as well confirms that sleeping disturbances may be associated with the disruption of circadian rhythms due to the blue light emission from the electronic screen-based media devices [26]. Negative outcomes including poor school performance, childhood overweight and obesity, and emotional issues have all been associated with sleep deprivation [21,26,43,47]. Inadequate sleep quality or quantity associated to social media use represents a risk factor for metabolic conditions such as for diabetes, cardiovascular disease and for mental problem, such as depression or substance abuse [49].
4.8. Social Media and Addiction
Ten reports found correlations between social media use and risk of different types of addictions: with internet [17,24,49,51,52,66], with substance abuse [15,67], with alcohol addiction and gaming [67], with gambling [68], and with tobacco use [69]. In Table 7, the major findings of the related reports are presented (Table 7).
Table 7.
Social media and addiction.
Investigating the impact of social media on adolescents’ wellbeing is a priority due to a progressive increase in mental health problems and access to Emergency Department [15]. Chiu reported that mental health or addiction related emergency department access increased by almost 90% in ten years mainly among adolescents aged 14–21 years. The increment well correlates to an increase availability of social media [15].
High screen use associated with internet addiction is also confirmed by O’Keeffe who states that technology is influencing children’s lives from a very young age [51].
More than 7% of youth have problematic social media use, indicated by symptoms of addiction to social media [52]. Warning signs of internet addiction can be skipping activities, meals, and homework for social media; weight loss or gain; a reduction in school grades [41]. In detail: concern, loss of controlling tolerance, withdrawal, instability and impulsiveness, mood modification, lies, and loss of interest have been identified as risk factors for smartphone addiction. Females have almost three times more risk for smartphone addiction than males and it may be related to a stronger desire for social relationships [66]. Main problems correlated to addiction are low self-esteem, stress, anxiety, depression, insecurity, solitude, and poor scholastic outcomes. Smartphone addiction correlates to both fear of missing out (FOMO) and boredom. FOMO is the apprehension of losing experiences and the consequent wish to remain constantly connected with others, continuously checking social applications. Boredom is defined as an unpleasant emotional state, related to lack of psychological involvement and interest associated with dissatisfaction, to cope with boredom adolescents may seek additional stimulation and compulsively use smartphones [49].
As well as O’Keeffe, Hawi found out that children are starting to use digital devices at a very young age, and so should be screened for the risk of digital addiction. New scales of early identifications have been developed such as the Digital Addiction Scale for Children, validated to assess the behavior of children 9 to 12 years old in association with digital devices usage. Out of the sample size, 12.4% were identified as at risk of addiction and most of them (62.4%) were male. Nevertheless, results demonstrated that weekday device use among females causes more conflicts [66].
Different grading scales can test addictions. A study assessed 700 adolescents aged from 14 to 18 years and found out that 65.6% were having internet addiction, 61.3% were gaming addicts, and 92.8% Facebook addicts. Internet addict students had statistically significant higher age, higher socioeconomic scale score, male gender, and lower last year grades in comparison to non-addicts. Depression, dysthymia, suicide, social anxiety, and phobias were common comorbidities in addicted adolescents [24].
In undergraduate students, disordered online social networking use is associated with higher levels of alcohol craving and in pupils aged from 11 to 13, it is associated with a higher likelihood of being substance users [67]. In addition, excessive video gaming is associated with increased substance use [15,67].
One report showed greater risk for children and adolescents to develop gambling problems. In fact, the prevalence of adolescent gambling has increased in recent years. Across Europe, self-reported rates of adolescent gambling in 2019 ranged from 36% in Italy to 78% in Iceland. Adolescent problem gambling prevalence ranges from 1.6 to 5.6%. Not only adolescents but also children are widely exposed to gambling advertisements on television and via social media. In recent years, there has been an expansion in sports betting online, and this has been heavily promoted by advertising and marketing attractive to adolescents. Gambling is also promoted to children via social media: children are sharing and re-tweeting messages from gambling companies, they are active in conversations around gambling, and regularly consume and share visual gambling adverts. Lastly, there is also a strong relationship between gaming and gambling: in video games, children pretend to gamble and some video games would ask real money to play [68].
Finally, there might be a relationship between youth using tobacco and tobacco social media posts. It is not clear if the relationship can be cause-effect or only a correlation. Adolescents who participate in conversations about tobacco in social media by posting positive messages about tobacco are more likely to be past-month tobacco users. Posting even only one positive tobacco-related tweet was associated with greater odds of using cigarettes, e-cigarettes, or any tobacco product, compared to those who did not post positive messages about tobacco [69].
Finally, social media has been associated to social media use and may represent a risk factor for the young as it interferes with dailies activities leading to unhealthy habits. The easy access to social media by smartphone undoubtedly facilitates addiction.
4.9. Social Media and Anxiety
We identified 10 publications reporting a relationship between social media use and anxiety. Out of them, three investigated the impact of COVID 19 pandemic on social media use and anxiety [15,16,17,18,22,23,31,32,33,70]. Table 8 summarized the main findings (Table 8).
Table 8.
Social media and anxiety.
4.9.1. Before COVID-19 Pandemic
Evidence agrees that the degree of social media usage in children is a significant predictor of anxiety and perceived stress levels and that it increases with each additional hour of social media use [17,23,31]. Anxiety may represent a risk factor for children and adolescents’ health as it influences the way they see their body, the way they feel, and it may impact on social acceptance and relations with peers.
The excessive use of at least one type of screen, including television, computer, social media, and video gaming, has been connected with anxiety symptoms in the pediatric age [22,23,31]. Furthermore, in Rutter’s study a significant association between depression and anxiety with social media use has been detached [16]. Nevertheless, it is still unclear if social media use provoke anxiety or if anxiety is the cause of excessive use of social media [16]. Emergency department visits for mental health, including anxiety problems, has arisen since 2009, likely linked to the increased use and the harmful effect of social media [15]. On the contrary, physical activity may protect the young against the harmful effect of social media, preventing depression and anxiety [16].
In a scientific report, Muzaffar confirmed that an association between anxiety and social media is of note. In detail, increased adolescent generalized anxiety symptoms were associated with increased Facebook use and repetitive Facebook habits. Anxious adolescents may not be able to control their discomfort to the point that they need to regularly go back to check their previous posting on Facebook [70].
The constant connection to social networks through digital devices, on its side, potentially contributes to feelings of anxiety. Adolescents and children suffering from social anxiety may prefer to interact with texting, instant messaging, and emailing than over face-to-face interactions. However, the behavior may increase risk in individuals vulnerable to social anxiety disorder because substituting digital media for interpersonal communication to avoid feared situations may be reinforced over time, making the person even more avoidant and worsening the symptoms and severity of social anxiety disorder [18].
However, in some studies, not just overexposure but also underexposure to social media was associated with adolescent anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation [22].
4.9.2. After COVID-19 Pandemic
Screen time and social media use have increased during the pandemic. Social media has been helpful during lockdown to keep social relationships and not to discontinuate school activities. However, an excessive Internet use may negatively affect children and adolescents’ well being. So, during social lockdown, an elevated psychological distress and anxious symptoms have been described in schoolchildren who increased time spent on screen [32,33]. Children who increased by 15 or 30 min daily the time spent on internet presented a high level of psychological distress.
4.10. Social Media and Sex Related Problems
Studies have found social media use related to sexual problematic behaviors such as early sexual activity, exposure to pornography, and sexting. [21,22,26,50,51,71,72,73,74]. Table 9 summarizes the results (Table 9).
Table 9.
Social media and sex related problems.
The prevalence of sex related problems cannot be accurately recorded as for a wide range of definition and sampling methods and the comparison among reports is difficult.
Especially for girls, higher social media use, associated with lower family affluence and poorer body image, are key to early sexual activity [71].
Social media use was found to be significantly associated with risky sexual behavior among pre-college students in Ethiopia. Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and other platforms have been identified as a factor that alters adolescent’s perception and influences them to engage in risky sexual behavior. Those who view sexually suggestive Facebook photos have a higher chance of having unprotected sexual intercourse and sex with strangers [72].
Moreover, youth can be exposed to unwanted sexual material online, including unwanted nude pictures or sexually explicit videos through means such as pop-up windows or spam e-mails [73].
Children exposed to inappropriate sexual content are prone to high-risk behaviors in subsequent sexual encounters. [22] Sexting activities may also affect emotional and social wellbeing of adolescents; it is correlated to depression and risky health behaviors, such as substance use, alcohol consumption, and suicide [26,50]. The odds of risky sexual behavior were 1.23 higher in social media user than in other students [72]. Furthermore, on the internet, pornography is readily accessible by media device, so that Wana found out that 7% of students use social media for pornography. In most cases, adolescents admit they intentionally viewed materials [74]. Pornographic media depict a fantasy world in which unrealistic encounters result in immediate sexual gratification, and intimate relationships are nonexistent. Repeated exposure of the adolescent brain to the world of online pornography can make it difficult for adolescents to develop mature healthy sexual relationships [22].
Internet pornography usage has been documented in adolescents before the age of 18. Online pornography is often the first source of sex education for many adolescents, and exposure to violent pornography increases the odds of sexually aggressive behavior [50]. Peer advice as well as substance abuse are significant predictor for risky sexual behavior [72].
Finally, among adolescents 10–19 years of age, the rate of sexting ranges from 5 to 22% [50,72,74].
Sexting is the use of media to send nude or sexualized contents such as texts, photos, or videos. An extensive sharing of these contents through technology has been connected with a negative impact on the emotional and social wellbeing of adolescents involved. An earlier sexual debut such as the use of drugs and promiscuity have been all associated to the excessive use of sexting. It can also cause spreading of sexual content material without consent, to a third party as a method of bullying or revenge [21,26,51,74].
4.11. Social Media and Behavioral Problems
Out of the reports, seven explored the influence of social media and behavioral problems [22,49,64,75,76,77,78]. Table 10 outlines the highlighted findings (Table 10). Behavioral outcomes usually cover five areas, including hyperactivity/inattention, emotional symptoms, conduct problems, peer relationship, and pro-social behavior.
Table 10.
Social media and behavioral problems.
For children aged 10–15 years old, limited time on social media has no effect on most emotional and behavioral outcomes (and can even positively impact social relationships), while there are strong negative associations between very long hours on social media and increased emotional distress and worse behavioral outcomes, which continue for several years [75].
In accordance to McNamee, the study by Okada conducted in Japan [76] among children aged 9–10 years old highlighted that mobile devices usage time of less than 1 h was a protective factor for behavior problems in boys. Instead, the usage time of 1 h or more was a risk factor in girls. Among girls, a dose–response positive association was found between duration of mobile devices usage and total difficulty score. A U-shaped association was found between duration of mobile devices usage and behavioral problems in boys: moderate use of mobile devices might be a tool for relaxation or alleviating distress through interactions with peers. However, in the subscale analysis, boys who use two or more hours of mobile devices showed higher risk of emotional problems and peer problems [76].
Moreover, the social media violent content exposure may be a risk factor for violent and aggressive behaviors. In this context, levels of aggression are directly proportional to exposure of types of violent media content. Electronic and social media showing contents with fights, stealing, dead bodies, and people’s belongings being destroyed influence young viewers, as per observational-learning theory, making them believe that reacting aggressively in response to perception of any offense is acceptable [77].
In line with Tahir’s report, Maurer underlined a significant association between exposure to media violence and aggressive behavior, aggressive thoughts, angry feelings, and physiologic arousal. Media exposure is also negatively related to personal adjustment and school performance and positively related to risk-taking behaviors [22].
Another study confirmed that longer the time spent on screens, higher the risk for behavioral problems among children 9–10 years old, and depending on the content type visualization, the risk for an aggressive and rule-breaking behavior. This association was mediated by sleep duration: longer sleep duration was associated with fewer problem behaviors [64].
Challenges and risk-taking attitudes are frequent in child and youth culture. However, online challenges take on new meanings when mediated by digital sociability; they appear as a powerful communicative resource to reaffirm belonging, recognition, and audience adherence. They are a media strategy adopted by youth in the construction of an internet-mediated identity in which risk and violence are crucial devices in building a self-image capable of maintaining an audience. Nevertheless, they can involve potential self-inflicted injuries to participants, with risks ranging from minor to even lethal [78].
Finally, an emerging problem is the social phenomenon called Shakaiteki Hikikomori (social withdrawal). Most of them are males and they usually experience a social reclusion range from 1 to 4 years. They refuse to communicate even with their own family and spend even more than 12 h a day in front of a screen [49].
4.12. Social Media and Body Image
On social media platforms such as Facebook, Snapchat, and Instagram, body image has become an important topic [17,25,45,46,50,73]. Table 11 summarized the evidence. (Table 11). People post their most flattering photos and view those of others, creating an online environment that could be damaging to body image acceptance. Spending time on social media puts adolescents under a higher risk of comparing themselves to models that are more attractive. As a result, these unfavorable social comparisons of physical appearance may exacerbate body image apprehension [17,45].
Table 11.
Social media and body image.
Moreover, beauty trends are constantly reinforced through social media networks and image-editing tools are often used to alter images to fit beauty standards. Teenagers who, perhaps, are not aware of these digital changing made in commercial photos may become insecure of their image. This may reduce self-esteem and body satisfaction, mainly among adolescent girls, developing body image concerns, engaging in weight-modification behavior, and potentially developing eating disorders. Nowadays, adolescents, and, in particular, girls, need to fit “social media” standard for photo posting; they use to modify photos with specific programs in order to respect society beauty standard. In fact, 28% of girls aged 8–18 years admit to editing their photos to make themselves look more attractive prior to posting online [50].
In addition to social media causing body image problems, adolescents with body image misperception may look on the internet for advice on how to lose weight quickly. However, the suboptimal quality of online information contributes to the development of unhealthy eating attitudes and behaviors in young adolescents. It may be that the content of these sites promotes eating disorders by providing unhealthy weight loss advice [46].
Furthermore, the desire of perfection and selfie mania with repeated selfie can cause depression and self-harm. This is a typical symptom of body dysmorphic disorder [73].
Finally, this association between the use of social media, self-esteem and body image can be a correlation and not a cause-effect relation: girls with lower self-esteem and sensitive to body image complains may use social media more frequently than girls with a higher level of self-esteem. For example, users can make a “selective self-presentation” where they show themselves only in a positive way on their social media profiles [25].
4.13. Social Media and Physical Activity
Evidence supports a correlation between social media and physical activity [45,49,57,73,79]. Excessive use of smartphones and other digital devices can also cause physical problems, such as a more sedentary lifestyle [45], which is positively associated with childhood obesity. In addition, non-physiological postures assumed while using smartphones may lead to cervical rigidity and muscle pain resulting in neck strain or “Tech Neck”. Moreover, “texting thumb” is a form of tendinitis that comes from overusing the thumb from excessive texting, video gaming, and web browsing using a smartphone [49,73].
An Australian study found that non-organized physical activity declines between 11 and 13 years, especially in children with a large increase in activities of texting, emailing, social media, and other internet use [79].
Another study showed that problematic social media use is related to lower levels of vigorous physical activity, especially in girls [57].
Table 12.
Social media and physical activity.
4.14. Online Grooming
Online grooming may be defined as a situation in which an adult builds a relationship with a minor finalized to a sexual abuse using social media. [47,80]. The risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder in the victims is of note and may affect mental and well-being of children and adolescents [80].
Children are more vulnerable online as they often escape their parents’ control and may be more willing to share information or pictures about themselves than in real life.
Online grooming, differently to offline sexual abuse, is simpler to perpetrate, due to internet’s technology and accessibility. Furthermore, often the perpetrator misrepresents himself as another child or teenager, in order to establish a trusting relationship [21].
Teenage girls appear to be more at risk, even if the proportion of male victims is considerable too. In general, minors with problematic internet use are at greater risk of being groomed.
Sexual solicitation has been found to be more common in children spending longer time on internet on weekdays, being involved in sexting, having strangers in social networks friends list, playing online games, and chats. The risk is high even for adolescents whose curiosity and unconsciousness set them at risk of being deceived [80].
Table 13.
Social media and online grooming.
4.15. Social Media and Sight
Studies have investigated the risk of social media on sight, in terms of visual imbalance [22,49,73]. Evidence underlines that children can develop ocular disorders from excessive screen time, including myopia, eye fatigue, dryness, blurry vision, irritation, burning sensation, conjunctival injection, ocular redness, dry eye disease, decreased visual acuity, strain, fatigue acute acquired concomitant esotropia, and macular degeneration. During smartphone use, there is a reduction of the blink rate to 5–6/min that promotes tear evaporation and accommodation, leading to dry eye disease [49,73].
In addition, excessive screen time and less time spent outdoors may lead to early development of myopia, particularly with smartphone and tablet use [22].
Table 14.
Social media and sight.
4.16. Social Media and Headache
There are increased complaints of headaches related to staring at a screen for too long [62,73,81]. Reports dealing with social media and headache are listed in Table 15 (Table 15).
Table 15.
Social Media and headache.
Headache is actually the most common neurologic disorder in the population, children and adolescents included [81]. It may negatively impact on children and adolescents’ well-being, leading to stress, tiredness, anxiety, and bad mood. Time of usage of media device has been directly connected to headache: in particular, adolescents using more than 3 h a screen have a significantly higher risk of headache compared with those using a device for less than 2 h (p < 0.001). Spending even 2–3 h with a computer significantly increases the chance of suffering a headache in comparison with those using a computer for less than 2 h (p < 0.01). Excessive use of electronic devices is considered a risk factor, especially for the development of migraine-type headache (p < 0.05) [81].
According to recent studies, headache and somatic symptoms have been found mostly in patients with problematic social media usage, compared with non-problematic peers. There is a consistent association between the problematic use of social media and adolescent psychosomatic health [62,73].
4.17. Social Media and Dental Caries
The association between use of internet and social media has been studied in literature [35,82]. Table 16 summarizes the main findings (Table 16).
Table 16.
Social media and dental caries.
The association between use of internet social media to obtain oral health information and dental caries has been highlighted in Almoddahi’s report [82]. In detail, problematic internet use has been associated with unhealthy lifestyles, poor oral health behaviors, and more oral symptoms such as toothache, bleeding gums, and poor self-perceived oral health. Caries and junk food have been both connected to excessive internet use and ads [82]. Therefore, social media may be a risk factor for caries, poor oral health, and dental outcomes.
In line with Almoddahi, Radesky underlines that advertisements on social media promote intake of foods that contribute to dental caries, such as fast food and sugar beverages [35]. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that smartphone applications may improve health and oral health when internet-based health interventions are in place. Delivering oral health information via social media may increase tooth brushing and dental outcome [82].
5. Limitations
From the literature, it is not possible to decide whether social media use causes internalizing symptoms and problematic behaviors examined in this manuscript or whether children and adolescents suffering from depression, anxiety, or other psychological distress are more likely to spend time on social media. We can just state that there is an association between social media use and health problems, but that is not necessarily cause-effect. Moreover, the articles included are different, ranging from reviewers to clinical studies to letters and to editors, so that it may be difficult to accurately compare them. Third, as specified in the materials and methods, we excluded reports not in English letter and not published in PubMed.
Nevertheless, through our manuscript we contribute to the existing literature to highlighting the impact of social media use on adolescents, providing advices to pediatricians in everyday practice.
6. Conclusions
Social media is increasingly being used by children and adolescents, especially during COVID-19 pandemic and the health emergency. Although social media use demonstrated to be of utility, an excessive or non-correct use may be a risk factor for mental health, including depression, anxiety, and addiction.
Social media use may also correlate to a non-adequate nutrition with consumption of junk food marketing leading to weight gain, obesity, dental caries, and unhealthy eating behaviors. Associations have been found also with increasing physical problems due to sedentary lifestyle, obesity, and non-physiological postures. On the other hand, social media can cause problems with body image visualization and acceptance, especially in young adolescent girls with lower self-esteem, who may look for contents for losing weight rapidly, and this can help the extension of anorexia disorders.
Children and adolescents who use social media for many hours a day, are also at higher risk for behavioral problems, cyberbullying, online grooming, sleep difficulties, eye problems, (such as myopia, eye fatigue, dryness, blurry vision, irritation, burning sensation, conjunctival injection, ocular redness, and dry eye disease), and headache. Moreover, uncontrolled social media use, can lead to sexting, exposure to pornography, exposed to unwanted sexual material online, and early sexual activity. Social media users meet more online risks than their peers do, with an increased risk for those who are more digitally competence.
Public and medical awareness must rise over this topic and new prevention measures must be found, starting with health practitioners, caregivers, and websites/application developers. Families should be educating on the dangers and concerns of having children and adolescence online. Prerequisite to inform families how to handle social media is to educate those responsible for training, including health practitioners. In detail, pediatricians should be reminded to screen for media exposure (amount and content) during periodic check-up visits. They need to keep in mind a potential correlation of problematic social media use with depression, obesity and unhealthy eating behavior, psychological problems, sleep disorder, addiction, anxiety, sex related problem, behavioral problem, body image, physical inactivity, online grooming, sight compromising, headache, and dental caries. Pediatricians can also counsel parents to guide children to appropriate content by consulting ratings, reviews, plot descriptions, and by a previous screening of the material. They should inform parents about the potential risk of digital commerce to facilitate junk food, poor nutrition and sweetened aliments, facilitating overweight and obesity. On the contrary, a healthy diet, adequate physical activity and sleep need to be recommended. Pediatricians may also play a role in preventing cyberbullying by educating both adolescent and families on appropriate online behaviors and on privacy respect. They should also promote a face-to-face communication and to limit online communication by social media. Pediatricians may encourage parents to develop rules and strategies about media device and social media use at home as well as in every day’s life.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: E.B.; methodology: S.B.; formal analysis G.S. and A.D.M.; Resources R.A. and R.R.; writing E.S. and A.V.D.S.; visualization: C.C.; editing: A.S.; supervision G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data available at Dr Bozzola’s study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Spina, G.; Bozzola, E.; Ferrara, P.; Zamperini, N.; Marino, F.; Caruso, C.; Antilici, L.; Villani, A. Children and Adolescent’s Perception of Media Device Use Consequences. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cittadini e ICT. Available online: https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/236920 (accessed on 17 July 2022).
- Censis. Quarto Rapporto Auditel Censis. 19 November 2021. Available online: https://www.censis.it/ (accessed on 19 July 2022).
- Tra-Digitale-e-Cyber-Risk-MOIGE-1.Pdf. Available online: https://www.moige.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Tra-digitale-e-cyber-risk-MOIGE-1.pdf (accessed on 10 July 2022).
- Gonzales, A.; Hancock, J. Mirror, Mirror on My Facebook Wall: Effects of Exposure to Facebook on Self-Esteem. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2010, 14, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Heuzey, M.-F. Social media, children and pediatricians. Arch. Pediatr. 2012, 19, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carr, C.T.; Hayes, R.A. Social Media: Defining, Developing, and Divining. Atl. J. Commun. 2015, 23, 46–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kudchadkar, S.R.; Carroll, C.L. Using Social Media for Rapid Information Dissemination in a Pandemic: #PedsICU and Coronavirus Disease 2019. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 21, e538–e546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Obar, J.A.; Wildman, S.S. Social Media Definition and the Governance Challenge—An Introduction to the Special Issue. Telecommun. Policy 2015, 39, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Most Used Social Media 2021. Statista. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ (accessed on 17 July 2022).
- Pietrobelli, A.; Pecoraro, L.; Ferruzzi, A.; Heo, M.; Faith, M.; Zoller, T.; Antoniazzi, F.; Piacentini, G.; Fearnbach, S.N.; Heymsfield, S.B. Effects of COVID-19 Lockdown on Lifestyle Behaviors in Children with Obesity Living in Verona, Italy: A Longitudinal Study. Obesity 2020, 28, 1382–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, M.E. LibGuides: Creating a PRISMA Flow Diagram: PRISMA. 2020. Available online: https://guides.lib.unc.edu/prisma/step-by-step (accessed on 25 March 2022).
- Ouzzani, M.; Hammady, H.; Fedorowicz, Z.; Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan-a Web and Mobile App for Systematic Reviews. Syst. Rev. 2016, 5, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, M.; Gatov, E.; Fung, K.; Kurdyak, P.; Guttmann, A. Deconstructing the Rise in Mental Health-Related ED Visits Among Children And Youth in Ontario, Canada. Health Aff. 2020, 39, 1728–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutter, L.A.; Thompson, H.M.; Howard, J.; Riley, T.N.; De Jesús-Romero, R.; Lorenzo-Luaces, L. Social Media Use, Physical Activity, and Internalizing Symptoms in Adolescence: Cross-Sectional Analysis. JMIR Ment. Health 2021, 8, e26134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mougharbel, F.; Goldfield, G.S. Psychological Correlates of Sedentary Screen Time Behaviour among Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2020, 9, 493–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoge, E.; Bickham, D.; Cantor, J. Digital Media, Anxiety, and Depression in Children. Pediatrics 2017, 140 (Suppl. S2), S76–S80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoare, E.; Werneck, A.O.; Stubbs, B.; Firth, J.; Collins, S.; Corder, K.; van Sluijs, E.M.F. Association of Child and Adolescent Mental Health with Adolescent Health Behaviors in the UK Millennium Cohort. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2011381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Evans, B.; Kleppang, A.L.; Hagquist, C. The Association between Screen Time and Reported Depressive Symptoms among Adolescents in Sweden. Fam. Pract. 2021, 38, 773–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chassiakos, Y.L.R.; Radesky, J.; Christakis, D.; Moreno, M.A.; Cross, C.; Council on Communications and Media. Children and Adolescents and Digital Media. Pediatrics 2016, 138, e20162593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maurer, B.T.; Taylor, L.C. The Effect of Digital Media on Children in Their Formative Years. JAAPA 2020, 33, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keles, B.; McCrae, N.; Grealish, A. A Systematic Review: The Influence of Social Media on Depression, Anxiety and Psychological Distress in Adolescents. Int. J. Adolesc. Youth 2020, 25, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalil, S.A.; Kamal, H.; Elkholy, H. The Prevalence of Problematic Internet Use among a Sample of Egyptian Adolescents and Its Psychiatric Comorbidities. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 2022, 68, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richards, D.; Caldwell, P.H.Y.; Go, H. Impact of Social Media on the Health of Children and Young People. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2015, 51, 1152–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadjipanayis, A.; Efstathiou, E.; Altorjai, P.; Stiris, T.; Valiulis, A.; Koletzko, B.; Fonseca, H. Social Media and Children: What Is the Paediatrician’s Role? Eur. J. Pediatr. 2019, 178, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hamm, M.P.; Newton, A.S.; Chisholm, A.; Shulhan, J.; Milne, A.; Sundar, P.; Ennis, H.; Scott, S.D.; Hartling, L. Prevalence and Effect of Cyberbullying on Children and Young People: A Scoping Review of Social Media Studies. JAMA Pediatr. 2015, 169, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpenter, L.M.; Hubbard, G.B. Cyberbullying: Implications for the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner. J. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2014, 27, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aboujaoude, E.; Savage, M.W.; Starcevic, V.; Salame, W.O. Cyberbullying: Review of an Old Problem Gone Viral. J. Adolesc. Health 2015, 57, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Listernick, Z.I.; Badawy, S.M. Mental Health Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Children and Adolescents: What Do We Know so Far? Pediatr. Health Med. Ther. 2021, 12, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Armitage, R.C. Social Media Usage in Children: An Urgent Public Health Problem. Public Health 2021, 200, e2–e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caffo, E.; Asta, L.; Scandroglio, F. Predictors of Mental Health Worsening among Children and Adolescents during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2021, 34, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, I.-H.; Chen, C.-Y.; Pakpour, A.H.; Griffiths, M.D.; Lin, C.-Y.; Li, X.-D.; Tsang, H.W.H. Problematic Internet-Related Behaviors Mediate the Associations between Levels of Internet Engagement and Distress among Schoolchildren during COVID-19 Lockdown: A Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling Study. J. Behav. Addict. 2021, 10, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Théodore, F.L.; López-Santiago, M.; Cruz-Casarrubias, C.; Mendoza-Pablo, P.A.; Barquera, S.; Tolentino-Mayo, L. Digital Marketing of Products with Poor Nutritional Quality: A Major Threat for Children and Adolescents. Public Health 2021, 198, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radesky, J.; Chassiakos, Y.L.R.; Ameenuddin, N.; Navsaria, D.; Council on Communication and Media. Digital Advertising to Children. Pediatrics 2020, 146, e20201681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Folkvord, F.; Naderer, B.; Coates, A.; Boyland, E. Promoting Fruit and Vegetable Consumption for Childhood Obesity Prevention. Nutrients 2021, 14, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sacks, G.; Looi, E.S.Y. The Advertising Policies of Major Social Media Platforms Overlook the Imperative to Restrict the Exposure of Children and Adolescents to the Promotion of Unhealthy Foods and Beverages. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tan, L.; Ng, S.H.; Omar, A.; Karupaiah, T. What’s on YouTube? A Case Study on Food and Beverage Advertising in Videos Targeted at Children on Social Media. Child Obes. 2018, 14, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphy, G.; Corcoran, C.; Tatlow-Golden, M.; Boyland, E.; Rooney, B. See, Like, Share, Remember: Adolescents’ Responses to Unhealthy-, Healthy- and Non-Food Advertising in Social Media. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lutfeali, S.; Ward, T.; Greene, T.; Arshonsky, J.; Seixas, A.; Dalton, M.; Bragg, M.A. Understanding the Extent of Adolescents’ Willingness to Engage with Food and Beverage Companies’ Instagram Accounts: Experimental Survey Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020, 6, e20336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.A.; Smith, J.E.M. “Covibesity,” a New Pandemic. Obes. Med. 2020, 19, 100282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khajeheian, D.; Colabi, A.M.; Ahmad Kharman Shah, N.B.; Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi, C.W.J.; Jenatabadi, H.S. Effect of Social Media on Child Obesity: Application of Structural Equation Modeling with the Taguchi Method. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mazur, A.; Caroli, M.; Radziewicz-Winnicki, I.; Nowicka, P.; Weghuber, D.; Neubauer, D.; Dembiński, Ł.; Crawley, F.P.; White, M.; Hadjipanayis, A. Reviewing and Addressing the Link between Mass Media and the Increase in Obesity among European Children: The European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and The European Childhood Obesity Group (ECOG) Consensus Statement. Acta Paediatr. 2018, 107, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Custers, K. The Urgent Matter of Online Pro-Eating Disorder Content and Children: Clinical Practice. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2015, 174, 429–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borzekowski, D.L.G. Constancy (the New Media “C”) and Future Generations. Health Educ. Behav. 2019, 46 (Suppl. S2), S20–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moorman, E.L.; Warnick, J.L.; Acharya, R.; Janicke, D.M. The Use of Internet Sources for Nutritional Information Is Linked to Weight Perception and Disordered Eating in Young Adolescents. Appetite 2020, 154, 104782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Purves, R.I.; Stead, M.; Eadie, D. “I Wouldn’t Be Friends with Someone If They Were Liking Too Much Rubbish”: A Qualitative Study of Alcohol Brands, Youth Identity and Social Media. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wise, J. Social Media: End Self Regulation, Say MPs in Report on Children’s Health. BMJ 2019, 364, l486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bozzola, E.; Spina, G.; Ruggiero, M.; Vecchio, D.; Caruso, C.; Bozzola, M.; Staiano, A.M.; Agostiniani, R.; Del Vecchio, A.; Banderali, G.; et al. Media Use during Adolescence: The Recommendations of the Italian Pediatric Society. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2019, 45, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, J.; Das, P.; Muthiah, N.; Milanaik, R. New Age Technology and Social Media: Adolescent Psychosocial Implications and the Need for Protective Measures. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2019, 31, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Keeffe, G.S. Overview: New Media. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2012, 59, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagata, J.M. New Findings from the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Survey: Social Media, Social Determinants, and Mental Health. J. Adolesc. Health 2020, 66, S1–S2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marengo, N.; Borraccino, A.; Charrier, L.; Berchialla, P.; Dalmasso, P.; Caputo, M.; Lemma, P. Cyberbullying and Problematic Social Media Use: An Insight into the Positive Role of Social Support in Adolescents-Data from the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Study in Italy. Public Health 2021, 199, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uludasdemir, D.; Kucuk, S. Cyber Bullying Experiences of Adolescents and Parental Awareness: Turkish Example. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2019, 44, e84–e90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Favotto, L.; Michaelson, V.; Pickett, W.; Davison, C. The Role of Family and Computer-Mediated Communication in Adolescent Loneliness. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boer, M.; van den Eijnden, R.J.J.M.; Boniel-Nissim, M.; Wong, S.-L.; Inchley, J.C.; Badura, P.; Craig, W.M.; Gobina, I.; Kleszczewska, D.; Klanšček, H.J.; et al. Adolescents’ Intense and Problematic Social Media Use and Their Well-Being in 29 Countries. J. Adolesc. Health 2020, 66, S89–S99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buda, G.; Lukoševičiūtė, J.; Šalčiūnaitė, L.; Šmigelskas, K. Possible Effects of Social Media Use on Adolescent Health Behaviors and Perceptions. Psychol. Rep. 2021, 124, 1031–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McDool, E.; Powell, P.; Roberts, J.; Taylor, K. The Internet and Children’s Psychological Wellbeing. J. Health Econ. 2020, 69, 102274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Twigg, L.; Duncan, C.; Weich, S. Is Social Media Use Associated with Children’s Well-Being? Results from the UK Household Longitudinal Study. J. Adolesc. 2020, 80, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, S.D.; Sela, T.; De Looze, M.; Craig, W.; Cosma, A.; Harel-Fisch, Y.; Boniel-Nissim, M.; Malinowska-Cieślik, M.; Vieno, A.; Molcho, M.; et al. Clusters of Contemporary Risk and Their Relationship to Mental Well-Being among 15-Year-Old Adolescents across 37 Countries. J. Adolesc. Health 2020, 66, S40–S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sümen, A.; Evgin, D. Social Media Addiction in High School Students: A Cross-Sectional Study Examining Its Relationship with Sleep Quality and Psychological Problems. Child Indic. Res. 2021, 14, 2265–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marino, C.; Lenzi, M.; Canale, N.; Pierannunzio, D.; Dalmasso, P.; Borraccino, A.; Cappello, N.; Lemma, P.; Vieno, A.; The 2018 HBSC-Italia Group. Problematic Social Media Use: Associations with Health Complaints among Adolescents. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 2020, 56, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Varghese, N.E.; Santoro, E.; Lugo, A.; Madrid-Valero, J.J.; Ghislandi, S.; Torbica, A.; Gallus, S. The Role of Technology and Social Media Use in Sleep-Onset Difficulties among Italian Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e20319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guerrero, M.D.; Barnes, J.D.; Chaput, J.-P.; Tremblay, M.S. Screen Time and Problem Behaviors in Children: Exploring the Mediating Role of Sleep Duration. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2019, 16, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lund, L.; Sølvhøj, I.N.; Danielsen, D.; Andersen, S. Electronic Media Use and Sleep in Children and Adolescents in Western Countries: A Systematic Review. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawi, N.S.; Samaha, M.; Griffiths, M.D. The Digital Addiction Scale for Children: Development and Validation. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2019, 22, 771–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turhan Gürbüz, P.; Çoban, Ö.G.; Erdoğan, A.; Kopuz, H.Y.; Adanir, A.S.; Önder, A. Evaluation of Internet Gaming Disorder, Social Media Addiction, and Levels of Loneliness in Adolescents and Youth with Substance Use. Subst. Use Misuse 2021, 56, 1874–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emond, A.M.; Griffiths, M.D. Gambling in Children and Adolescents. Br. Med. Bull. 2020, 136, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unger, J.B.; Urman, R.; Cruz, T.B.; Majmundar, A.; Barrington-Trimis, J.; Pentz, M.A.; McConnell, R. Talking about Tobacco on Twitter Is Associated with Tobacco Product Use. Prev. Med. 2018, 114, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muzaffar, N.; Brito, E.B.; Fogel, J.; Fagan, D.; Kumar, K.; Verma, R. The Association of Adolescent Facebook Behaviours with Symptoms of Social Anxiety, Generalized Anxiety, and Depression. J. Can. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2018, 27, 252–260. [Google Scholar]
- Gazendam, N.; Cleverley, K.; King, N.; Pickett, W.; Phillips, S.P. Individual and Social Determinants of Early Sexual Activity: A Study of Gender-Based Differences Using the 2018 Canadian Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Study (HBSC). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wana, G.W.; Arulogun, O.; Roberts, A.; Kebede, A.S. Predictors of Risky Sexual Behaviour among Pre-College Students in Adama Town, Ethiopia. Pan. Afr. Med. J. 2019, 33, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solecki, S. The Smart Use of Smartphones in Pediatrics. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2020, 55, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collins, R.L.; Strasburger, V.C.; Brown, J.D.; Donnerstein, E.; Lenhart, A.; Ward, L.M. Sexual Media and Childhood Well-Being and Health. Pediatrics 2017, 140 (Suppl. S2), S162–S166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McNamee, P.; Mendolia, S.; Yerokhin, O. Social Media Use and Emotional and Behavioural Outcomes in Adolescence: Evidence from British Longitudinal Data. Econ. Hum. Biol. 2021, 41, 100992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okada, S.; Doi, S.; Isumi, A.; Fujiwara, T. The Association between Mobile Devices Use and Behavior Problems among Fourth Grade Children in Japan. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2021, 75, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tahir, A.; Baig, L.A.; Ahmer, Z. Does Watching Violent Electronic and Social Media Content Lead to Increased Levels of Aggression? A Survey among Adolescents in an Urban Slum of Metropolitan Karachi. Int. J. Adolesc. Med. Health 2020, 20200037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deslandes, S.F.; Coutinho, T.; Ramos de Souza Costa Ferreira, T.; Flach, R.M.D. Online Challenges among Children and Adolescents: Self-Inflicted Harm and Social Media Strategies. Salud. Colect. 2020, 16, e3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kemp, B.J.; Parrish, A.-M.; Cliff, D.P. “Social Screens” and “the Mainstream”: Longitudinal Competitors of Non-Organized Physical Activity in the Transition from Childhood to Adolescence. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2020, 17, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Forni, G.; Pietronigro, A.; Tiwana, N.; Gandolfi, C.E.; Del Castillo, G.; Mosillo, M.; Pellai, A. Little Red Riding Hood in the Social Forest. Online Grooming as a Public Health Issue: A Narrative Review. Ann. Ig. 2020, 32, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Çaksen, H. Electronic Screen Exposure and Headache in Children. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 2021, 24, 8–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Almoddahi, D.; Machuca Vargas, C.; Sabbah, W. Association of Dental Caries with Use of Internet and Social Media among 12 and 15-Year-Olds. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2022, 80, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).