Next Article in Journal
Antenatal Classes in the Context of Prenatal Anxiety and Depression during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
A Socioecological Perspective of How Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour at Home Changed during the First Lockdown of COVID-19 Restrictions: The HomeSPACE Project
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 9
10.3390/ijerph19095069
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between Depressive Symptoms and Weather Conditions

by
Agnė Brazienė
1,
Jonė Venclovienė
1,2,
Vidmantas Vaičiulis
3,4,*,
Dalia Lukšienė
1,3,
Abdonas Tamošiūnas
1,5,
Irena Milvidaitė
1,
Ričardas Radišauskas
1,3 and
Martin Bobak
6
1
Institute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Sukileliu Ave. 15, 50103 Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Department of Environmental Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Donelaičio St. 58, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania
3
Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes St. 18, 47181 Kaunas, Lithuania
4
Health Research Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes St. 18, 47181 Kaunas, Lithuania
5
Department of Preventive Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes St. 18, 47181 Kaunas, Lithuania
6
Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(9), 5069; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095069
Submission received: 22 February 2022 / Revised: 31 March 2022 / Accepted: 20 April 2022 / Published: 21 April 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Weather is a well-known factor worldwide in psychiatric problems such as depression, with the elderly and females being particularly susceptible. The aim of this study was to detect associations between the risk of depressive symptoms (DS) and weather variables. Methods: 6937 participants were assessed in the baseline survey of the Health Alcohol Psychosocial Factors in Eastern Europe (HAPIEE) study during 2006–2008. To assess the risk of DS, a multivariate logistic model was created with predictors such as socio-demographic factors, health behaviors, and weather variables. Results: DS were found in 23.4% of the respondents, in 15.6% of males and in 29.9% in females. A higher risk of DS (by 25%) was associated with November–December, a rising wind speed, and relative humidity (RH) < 94% and snowfall during the cold period occurring 2 days before the survey. A higher air temperature (>14.2 °C) predominant during May–September had a protective impact. A higher risk of DS in males was associated with lower atmospheric pressure (<1009 hPa) 2 days before. Females were more sensitive to the monthly variation, snowfall, and RH. Conclusions: The findings of our study suggest that some levels of weather variables have a statistically significant effect on DS.

1. Introduction

A number of health disorders such as cardiovascular [1,2], respiratory [3,4], or nervous system diseases [5,6,7] are related to weather conditions. Meteorological factors affect both physical and mental health [8,9]. One of the most relevant psychiatric disorders today is depression [10]. The development of depression is affected by many environmental factors, such as increased ambient air pollution [11,12,13], geomagnetic storms [14], seasonal variation [15], and traffic noise [16].
Depression is a highly prevalent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and is associated with morbidity and mortality from these diseases [17,18,19]. The diagnosis of depression and higher levels of depressive symptoms predicted elevated mortality in cancer patients [20], was associated with the development of dementia [21] and hospital readmission in older adults with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [22], aggravated the prognosis of Parkinson’s disease [23], and negatively influenced quality of life [24,25].
One of the environmental factors that constantly draw the attention of researchers is how seasonal variation and weather changes affect mood and depressive symptoms (DS) [26], yet these results are inconsistent in different studies. Some found elevated DS in winter [15,27,28], while the effect of seasonality on DS was not observed in other large-scale studies [29], or the effect of seasonality was dependent on sex [30,31]. In addition, depressive symptoms are common and insufficiently investigated in older adults. Among these, mood may be particularly vulnerable to the effects of changing environmental stimuli owing to lifestyle considerations (e.g., reduced physical activity in winter months) but also due to changing neurophysiology that accompanies aging (e.g., altered circadian rhythms). Much work has investigating seasonality in the epidemiological literature, but has not extended to include older age groups or has focused on particular age extremes [15]. According to a large review study performed by Italian researchers, this delay in studies on climate change and their mental health consequences is significant. The lack of literature is perhaps due to the complexity and novelty of this issue [32]. The aim of this study was to detect the associations between the risk of DS and weather variables. It was conducted to answer the following questions: (a) do weather variables increase the risk of DS; (b) is the association between weather variables and depressive symptoms stronger in women than in men; (c) is the association between weather variables and depressive symptoms stronger in the elderly than in young adults?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Description

The study was performed in Kaunas, the second largest city of Lithuania. This article presents data from the framework of the international Health, Alcohol and Psychosocial Factors in Eastern Europe (HAPIEE) study conducted during 2006–2008. The participants were randomly selected by sex and age (45–74 years) from the Kaunas population register database. In total, 7077 respondents participated in this survey. The final study sample consisted of 6937 participants, because in 140 (2%) cases no data on DS were available. Information on other variables was obtained by using a structured questionnaire with questions about education, marital and smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, antihypertensive treatment, and other factors. DS was evaluated using the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, (CES-D 10) [33,34]. All the participants were asked to answer 10 questions to evaluate the presence of DS during the past week. Each answer was rated as either 0 or 1, 0 meaning “no”, and 1 meaning “yes”. The maximal possible sum of the evaluation points ranged from 0 to 10. If the sum of the scores was equal to or greater than 4, patients were regarded as having DS [35]. The survey was performed during January–June and during September–December.
During the studied period, the main Kaunas meteorological monitoring station (Air Force Datsav3 station number: 266290; DMS coordinates 54°53′02.7″ N 23°50′09.2″ E) (hereafter—Station No. 1) located 6 km to the west of Kaunas city center provided daily records of minimum, maximum, and mean daily air temperature (T, °C), dew point temperature (°C), wind speed (WS, knots (kt)), atmospheric pressure (AP, hPa), and snowfall days. The apparent temperature (AT), defined as a person’s perceived air temperature, was calculated from the air and dewpoint temperature [36] by using the following formula: −2.653 + 0.994 × (air temperature (°C)) + 0.0153 × (dew point temperature (°C))2. The information on mean daily relative humidity (RH, %) was obtained from Kaunas International Airport weather station (Air Force Datsav3 station number: 266295; DMS coordinates 54°57′50.4″ N 24°05′06.0″ E) (hereafter—Station No. 2) located 14 km northeast of Kaunas city center. Both of the aforementioned weather stations are located on the outskirts of Kaunas city.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

First, we detected clinical and behavioral variables that were significantly associated with DS. To assess the crude association between sociodemographic, health behavior, and categorical weather variables and the prevalence of DS, the χ2 test was used. Second, we analyzed the crude associations between the weather pattern and the risk of DS. As the dependent variable DS is binary (yes, no), to assesses the crude association between continuous weather variables and the prevalence of DS, univariate logistic regression was used. In the analysis, as predictors, we used the mean values of weather variables and their range (maximal value-minimal value) on the day of the survey and on 2 previous days (with a lag of 0–2 days). The terms for weather variables were used as continuous or categorized. The cut-offs of categorical variables were detected by using the classification and regression tree (CRT, http://links.lww.com/HJH/B6 (accessed on January 2022)) method [37]. The cut-offs for air temperature variables were detected by the first split of notes, and for other weather variables by 1–2 splits. We investigated the effect of weather variables throughout the study period and separately during the cold (November–March) and warm (April–October) periods. To assess the risk of DS, a multivariate logistic model was created with predictors such as statistically significant demographic factors, health behavior, and categorical weather variables:
P { Y = 1 | X = x } = exp ( g ( x ) ) 1 + exp ( g ( x ) ) ,   where   g ( x ) = β 0 + β 1 x ( 1 ) + β 2 x ( 2 ) + … + β k x ( k ) ,
where P{Y = 1|X = x} is the probability of the presence of a DS, x(i), I = 1, 2,…, k are the socio-demographic, health behavior, and weather variables, βi are the regression coefficients, and (exp(βi) is adjusted OR). The final model for DS included only weather variables whose p-value of the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was less than 0.05. The effect of the weather variables was also assessed separately for males and females.
The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 software. The indicators of risk are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the p-value.

3. Results

We investigated the data of 6937 participants, 3145 males (45.3%) and 3792 females (54.7%), whose age ranged from 45 to 74 years (mean age, 58.8 years, SD = 7.5 years). DS were found in 1623 (23.4%) of the respondents. In males, DS were observed in 15.6% of the respondents, but in females, DS occurred almost twice as often, i.e., in 29.9% of the participants. Table 1 presents demographic, social, and other risk factors for the presence of DS. Almost half of participants (45.7%) were interviewed during the cold period. The rate of DS during cold and warm periods was similar, 23.5% and 23.3%, respectively.
During 2006–2008, the median (the first and the third quartiles) for T was 7.3 (2.9; 12.4) (°C), for AP 1008 (1015; 1021) (hPa), for RH 83 (71; 91) (%), and for WS 6.9 (5.0; 8.7) (kt). A higher rate of DS was observed during March–April (25.1%) and during November–December (25.2%) as compared to other months (22.3%) (p = 0.024).
During the cold period, snowfall 2 days before the survey had the greatest impact on the risk of DS (29.8%). A similar influence on the risk of DS was found when the mean day air temperature on the previous day was lower than 0.3 °C (26.0%), RH was lower than 94% with a lag of 2 days, and wind speed was lower than 10 m/s per day before the survey (Figure 1). A negative association between WS with a lag of 1 day and the risk of DS was found (crude OR = 0.97 95% CI 0.91–0.99). However, the effect of these weather variables was statistically significant only in females (Figure 1).
Mostly during the warm period, DS was observed when AP two days before the survey was lower than 1007 hPA (26.7%) and when the WS was higher than 4.5 m/s (24.3%) (Figure 1). A statistically significant effect of higher WS and lower AP and AT was found only in males.
Throughout the studied period, rising wind, if WS on the previous days was lower than 6 kt (40th percentile) (27.4%) (Figure 2), had the greatest influence on the risk of DS, both for males and females.
A similar effect on the manifestation of DS was observed when WS was higher than 4.5 m/s (23.9%) and WS was lower than 10 m/s (24%), but for males and females WS variables had different effects. In females, a higher rate of DS was observed if RH on the previous day was lower than 83%, while in males, such effect was observed when RH on the previous day was higher than 80% (Figure 2). During both periods, DS was the rarest when ambient temperature was higher than 14.2 °C (20.3%) two days before the survey (Figure 2). A higher T had a stronger effect in males, but a T lower than 0.3 °C had a significant effect in females. For males, AP lower than 1009 hPa two days before the survey was associated with a higher rate of DS (17.8%).
According to the multivariate logistic model for all the participants, the risk of DS was related to female sex (OR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.90–2.54), primary or vocational education (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.31–1.88), and physical inactivity (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.31–1.70). During November–December, the risk of DS increased by 1.25 times. ORs of DS were related to the RH lower than 93.5% (OR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.07–1.61) and to the rising wind if WS on the previous days was lower than 6 kt (OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.14–1.49) (Table 2). Snowfall during the cold period increased the odds ratio (OR) of DS manifestation by 1.28 times (95% CI 1.01–1.64).

4. Discussion

According to our findings, a higher risk of DS was associated with November–December and a weather pattern related to a colder period such as snowfall, especially for females. Apart from this, a higher T (>14.2 °C) that was predominant during May–September had a protective impact. The effect of seasonality was stronger in females. These results corroborate those obtained by other authors. The study with a repeated measurement design [31] showed a higher depression score measured by the BDI instrument during the non-summer period, and the effect of seasonality was stronger in females.
We found that a higher rate of DS was observed on “rising WS” days, if WS on the previous days was lower than the 40th percentile” and, for females, on days after a lower RH. During the study period, these weather patterns were more common during the non-winter period, especially during summer, and were associated with a lower RH and a lower cloud level. Therefore, these conditions may be associated with a lower level of negative air ions during the non-winter period. The results of the meta-analysis showed that a higher level of negative air ions (negative air ionization) was associated with lower depression scores [38]. During the days with higher RH, there was possibly more precipitation, and, at the same time, negative air ion concentration increased [39]. Apart from this, days of RH > 93% during the study period were associated with a lower daily AP, a higher rate of precipitation, and with higher cyclonic activity. It is probable that these days may be associated with an increase in negative air ion (NAI) exposure. NAIs were generated from the surrounding air molecules by charging themselves negatively when water droplets collide with each other or with a wetted solid to form a fine spray of drops [40]. A higher negative air ion concentration during wetter days due to the amount of precipitation (Lenard effect) [40] on the previous day may be linked to a lower score for DS in females. Evidence has shown that NAIs could significantly reduce the level of serotonin in blood or brain [40,41]. The results of other studies also showed a positive effect of rain on mental health. Rainfall decreased the risk of panic anxiety disorders [9]. Anxiety episodes seemed to increase just before a storm set in and to decrease after the onset [42].
According to the multivariate model, males were more sensitive to changes in AP, whereas females were more sensitive to seasonal variation, snowfall, and RH. For males, vice versa, a higher RH was associated with an elevated rate of DS, but this effect was non-significant in the multivariate model. Meanwhile, a higher rate of DS was observed in males two days after a lower AP. These weather conditions are usually associated with cyclonic conditions and rain and snow, which may change human activities and cause stress and DS, especially in males. Research conducted by other authors showed that low AP was associated with an increase in impulsive behaviors [43], migraine attacks in patients with migraine [44], and suicides [45]. Apart from this, males were found to be more prone to attempt suicide under low AP, while females exhibited such a trend under high AP [46]. In addition, animal experimental models showed that lowering barometric pressure aggravated depression-related behaviors [47]. These results are in line with our findings.
We found that a higher rate of DS was observed on “rising WS” days if WS on the previous days was lower than the 40th percentile”. During the warmer period, this pattern was associated with a higher daily mean T and WS on the days of the survey and a higher fall in the daily AP. These conditions were associated with warmer and dry winds that are known to increase the concentration of positive ions in the atmosphere [9], which increases blood and brain serotonin levels [48]. During the colder period, these conditions of rising WS were associated with a lower T, a higher AP, and higher changes in the daily AP, i.e., with colder air. The elevation of positive air ions during the warmer period and with colder air might be relevant factors in the correlation between these changes in WS and DS.
A number of studies found differences between men and women in health effects and mortality from cardiovascular diseases in relation to weather conditions and other meteorological factors [49,50,51]. The strong male/female difference in depression is well-known and is often reported in the literature [52,53,54]. One study in the south of the Netherlands showed that men had seasonal peaks of major depression and sad mood in the summer, while women had seasonal peaks in the fall [55]. This is in contrast to our study, where a higher rate of DS in females was observed during March–April. Many theories suggest that the variations in serotonin level could lead to the development of many neurological and psychiatric disorders, including depression [56]. Patients with depression are known to show a significant reduction in the levels of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), 5-HIAA being a serotonin metabolite produced in the brain from tryptophan, which is among the few amino acids that reach the central nervous system [56]. Circannual variation in 5-HIAA fitted with a spring-peak; according to the non-parametric regression, especially during March–April and with a minimum in summer [57]. The correlation between 5-HIAA seasonality and DS was found to be statistically significant [57]. It is probable that a higher rate of DS in females during March–April was due to annual fluctuations in the serotonin level.
Several recent studies have suggested promising ideas for future work. One of these is a cross-sectional study in Poland which revealed that medium positive correlations were found between meteoro-sensitivity/meteoropathy and cyclothymic and anxious temperaments. Small positive correlations were revealed between depressive and irritable temperaments and both meteoro-sensitivity and meteoropathy scales. No correlation was found between hyper-thymic temperament and meteoro-sensitivity/meteoropathy. The results also suggest that affective temperaments may be more related to meteoropathy symptoms in women [58], and also with stress [59]. Another new study, performed as a cross-over study, evaluated the effect of acute stress induced with the socially evaluated cold pressor test (SECPT) on cortical meta-plasticity in humans using a non-invasive brain stimulation protocol. The results showed that SECPT induced cardiovascular adaptations (increase in systolic, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate), indicating that SECPT effectively induced acute stress. These experiments’ stimulation of subjects with sub-threshold 1-Hz repetitive stimulation (rTMS) after they had undergone the SECPT condition also induced inhibition of evoked potential (MEP), whereas 1-Hz rTMS administered after the control condition induced a facilitatory (physiologic) response pattern. Here we observed that acute stress impairs homeostatic meta-plasticity. In men, the dysfunctional regulation of cortical plastic changes after stress could play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of neurological and psychiatric diseases [60].
Meanwhile, we found a statistically significant effect of some levels of weather variables on DS, but the effect of continuous weather variables was non-significant. Other researchers did not find any statistically significant meteorological predictors for DS [28], possibly because they used quantitative meteorological variables in the regression models, or longer-term averages were used that did not reflect short-term changes in meteorological conditions. Since the effects of potentially non-linear meteorological variables are observed, the use of categorical predictors gives better results.

5. Limitations

There are some limitations to our study. One is that the survey was not performed during July-August—the hottest summer months, and therefore the effect of heat was not evaluated. Another limitation to the presented study is the cross-sectional nature of the design. In common with the majority of epidemiological studies, we did not apply diagnostic interviews for depression but used a self-report questionnaire for the evaluation of the frequency of DS. We did not have the opportunity to obtain all the meteorological data we need from one meteorological station, or from both stations. Therefore, we used different meteorological indicators from the separate meteorological stations (from Station No. 1—daily air temperature, dew point temperature, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, and snowfall days; from Station No. 2—relative humidity). However, given the quite small size of the territory of the Kaunas region and the even population distribution, this is unlikely no influence our results. Using the results of a single series of weather conditions for the entire city can lead to exposure misclassification. One more limitation is that we did not analyze the role of other lifestyle factors such as the frequency of alcohol use, stress and burnout rates at work and at home, unemployment, working conditions, or antidepressant use, which could influence the outcome of DS. Finally, this study represents only one city and urban population, and thus the results cannot be reasonably generalized to the whole population of Lithuania.

6. Conclusions

The results of our study showed a statistically significant effect of some levels of weather variables (daily air temperature, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, and relative humidity) on depressive symptoms, but the effect of continuous weather variables was non-significant.

Author Contributions

A.B., J.V. and A.T. contributed to the study concept and design and were involved in the analysis, the interpretation of the data, and the writing of the manuscript. I.M. and V.V. contributed to writing the manuscript and the interpretation of the data. D.L. and R.R. contributed to drafting the manuscript, the analysis, and the interpretation of the data. J.V. performed the statistical analysis. M.B. contributed to the study concept and design as well as to the supervision of the research group. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Welcome Trust, 081081/Z/06/Z, US National Institute on Aging”, grant number 1R0I AG23522 and by the “EU-funded Ageing Trajectories of Health: Longitudinal Opportunities and Synergies (ATHLOS)”, grant number 635316 projects.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the study protocol for "Health, Alcohol and Psychosocial Factors in Eastern Europe (HAPIEE)" was approved by the Kaunas Regional Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (No. 05/09 11 January 2005).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are not accessible online.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to the European Social Fund for supporting one of the co-authors of this article Vidmantas Vaičiulis according to the project “The impact of climate change on public health”, Project No. 09.3.3-LMT-K-712-19-0002) under the Grant Agreement with the Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT). Regarding that, collaboration with senior co-authors allowed become a better PostDoc researcher and to reach the goals and indicators of the project. The authors also would like to thank all the team members who collected data for the Kaunas HAPIEE study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Pourshaikhian, M.; Moghadamnia, M.T.; Yekaninejad, M.S.; Ghanbari, A.; Rashti, A.S.; Kamachli, S.A. The effects of meteorological variables on ambulance attendance for cardiovascular diseases in Rasht, Iran. J. Therm. Biol. 2019, 83, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, J.; Hou, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, M.; Zhou, C.; Xiao, Y.; Yu, M.; Huang, B.; Xu, X.; Lin, L.; et al. Life loss of cardiovascular diseases per death attributable to ambient temperature: A national time series analysis based on 364 locations in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 756, 142614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ma, P.; Wang, S.; Zhou, J.; Li, T.; Fan, X.; Fan, J.; Wang, S. Meteorological rhythms of respiratory and circulatory diseases revealed by Harmonic Analysis. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, D.-S.; He, J.; Gao, S.-H.; Hu, B.-K.; Ma, S.-L. Correlation analysis for the attack of respiratory diseases and meteorological factors. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2011, 17, 600–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Qi, X.; Wang, Z.; Xia, X.; Xue, J.; Gu, Y.; Han, S.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Leng, S.X. Potential Impacts of Meteorological Variables on Acute Ischemic Stroke Onset. Risk Manag. Health Policy 2020, 13, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tamasauskiene, L.; Rastenyte, D.; Radisauskas, R.; Tamosiunas, A.; Tamasauskas, D.; Vaiciulis, V.; Kranciukaite-Butylkiniene, D.; Milinaviciene, E. Relationship of meteorological factors and acute stroke events in Kaunas (Lithuania) in 2000–2010. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 9286–9293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Scheidt, J.; Koppe, C.; Rill, S.; Reinel, D.; Wogenstein, F.; Drescher, J. Influence of temperature changes on migraine occurrence in Germany. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 57, 649–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; Xie, M.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Bai, L.; Su, H. Effect of increasing temperature on daily hospital admissions for schizophrenia in Hefei, China: A time-series analysis. Public Health 2018, 159, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bulbena, A.; Pailhez, G.; Cunillera, J.; Rius, A.; Garcia-Ribera, C.; Rojo, C. Panic anxiety, under the weather? Int. J. Biometeorol. 2005, 49, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cruz-Pereira, J.S.; Rea, K.; Nolan, Y.M.; O’Leary, O.F.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Depression’s Unholy Trinity: Dysregulated Stress, Immunity, and the Microbiome. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2020, 71, 49–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Szyszkowicz, M.; Willey, J.B.; Grafstein, E.; Rowe, B.H.; Colman, I. Air Pollution and Emergency Department Visits for Suicide Attempts in Vancouver, Canada. Environ. Health Insights 2010, 4, EHIS5662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Roberts, S.; Arseneault, L.; Barratt, B.; Beevers, S.; Danese, A.; Odgers, C.; Moffitt, T.; Reuben, A.; Kelly, F.J.; Fisher, H.L. Exploration of NO2 and PM2.5 air pollution and mental health problems using high-resolution data in London-based children from a UK longitudinal cohort study. Psychiatry Res. 2019, 272, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tsai, S.-S.; Chiu, Y.-W.; Weng, Y.-H.; Yang, C.-Y. Association between ozone air pollution levels and hospitalizations for depression in Taipei: A time-stratified case-crossover study. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2020, 83, 596–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kay, R.W. Geomagnetic Storms: Association with Incidence of Depression as Measured by Hospital Admission. Br. J. Psychiatry 1994, 164, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. O’Hare, C.; Sullivan, V.O.; Flood, S.; Kenny, R.A. Seasonal and meteorological associations with depressive symptoms in older adults: A geo-epidemiological study. J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 191, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Díaz, J.; López-Bueno, J.A.; López-Ossorio, J.; Gónzález, J.; Sánchez, F.; Linares, C. Short-term effects of traffic noise on suicides and emergency hospital admissions due to anxiety and depression in Madrid (Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 710, 136315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ma, L. Depression and cardiovascular disease in elderly: Current understanding. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2018, 47, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Raič, M. Depression and Heart Diseases: Leading Health Problems. Psychiatr. Danub. 2017, 4, 770–777. [Google Scholar]
  19. Celano, C.M.; Huffman, J.C. Depression and Cardiac Disease. Cardiol. Rev. 2011, 19, 130–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pinquart, M.; Duberstein, P. Depression and cancer mortality: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 2010, 40, 1797–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bennett, S.; Thomas, A.J. Depression and dementia: Cause, consequence or coincidence? Maturitas 2014, 79, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Connolly, M.; Yohannes, A. The impact of depression in older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Maturitas 2016, 92, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kitamura, S.; Nagayama, H. Depression in Parkinson’s disease. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi 2013, 115, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Sivertsen, H.; Bjørkløf, G.H.; Engedal, K.; Selbaek, G.; Helvik, A.-S. Depression and Quality of Life in Older Persons: A Review. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2015, 40, 311–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Han, K.; Yang, S.; Jia, W.; Wang, S.; Song, Y.; Cao, W.; Wang, J.; Liu, M.; He, Y. Health-Related Quality of Life and Its Correlation With Depression Among Chinese Centenarians. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 580757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Øverland, S.; Woicik, W.; Sikora, L.; Whittaker, K.; Heli, H.; Skjelkvåle, F.S.; Sivertsen, B.; Colman, I. Seasonality and symptoms of depression: A systematic review of the literature. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci. 2019, 29, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Park, D.; Kripke, D.F.; Cole, R.J. More Prominent Reactivity in Mood Than Activity and Sleep Induced by Differential Light Exposure Due to Seasonal and Local Differences. Chronobiol. Int. 2007, 24, 905–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kerr, D.C.R.; Shaman, J.; Washburn, I.J.; Vuchinich, S.; Neppl, T.K.; Capaldi, D.M.; Conger, R.D. Two longterm studies of seasonal variation in depressive symptoms among community participants. J. Affect. Disord. 2013, 151, 837–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Winthorst, W.H.; Post, W.J.; Meesters, Y.; Penninx, B.W.; Nolen, W.A. Seasonality in depressive and anxiety symptoms among primary care patients and in patients with depressive and anxiety disorders; results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety. BMC Psychiatry 2011, 11, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Schlager, D.; Schwartz, J.E.; Bromet, E.J. Seasonal Variations of Current Symptoms in a Healthy Population. Br. J. Psychiatry 1993, 163, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Harmatz, M.G.; Well, A.D.; Overtree, C.E.; Kawamura, K.Y.; Rosal, M.C.; Ockene, I.S. Seasonal Variation of Depression and Other Moods: A Longitudinal Approach. J. Biol. Rhythm. 2000, 15, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cianconi, P.; Betrò, S.; Janiri, L. The Impact of Climate Change on Mental Health: A Systematic Descriptive Review. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. González, P.; Nuñez, A.; Merz, E.; Brintz, C.; Weitzman, O.; Navas, E.L.; Camacho, A.; Buelna, C.; Penedo, F.J.; Wassertheil-Smoller, S.; et al. Measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D 10): Findings from HCHS/SOL. Psychol. Assess. 2017, 29, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Mohebbi, M.; Nguyen, V.; McNeil, J.; Woods, R.L.; Nelson, M.R.; Shah, R.C.; Storey, E.; Murray, A.M.; Reid, C.M.; Kirpach, B.; et al. Psychometric properties of a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D-10) scale for screening depressive symptoms in healthy community dwelling older adults. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2018, 51, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Irwin, M.; Artin, K.H.; Oxman, M.N. ASPREE Investigator Group. Psychometric properties of a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D-10) scale for screening depressive symptoms in healthy community dwelling older adults. Arch. Intern. Med. 1999, 159, 1701–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Zanobetti, A.; Schwartz, J. Temperature and Mortality in Nine US Cities. Epidemiology 2008, 19, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Breiman, L.; Friedman, J.H.; Olshen, R.A.; Stone, C.J. Classification and Regression Trees, 1st ed.; Routledge: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Perez, V.; Alexander, D.D.; Bailey, W.H. Air ions and mood outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Li, Y.; Guo, X.; Wang, T.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, W. Characteristics of Atmospheric Small Ions and Their Application to Assessment of Air Quality in a Typical Semi-Arid City of Northwest China. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2015, 15, 865–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Jiang, S.-Y.; Ma, A.; Ramachandran, S. Negative Air Ions and Their Effects on Human Health and Air Quality Improvement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ryushi, T.; Kita, I.; Sakurai, T.; Yasumatsu, M.; Isokawa, M.; Aihara, Y.; Hama, K. The effect of exposure to negative air ions on the recovery of physiological responses after moderate endurance exercise. Int. J. Biometeorol. 1998, 41, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Garcia-Carretero, L.; Llorca, G.; Villoria, M.J.; Blazquez, J.M.; Ledesma, A. Relaciones entre las urgencias psiquiatricas y losfactores meteorologicos. Actas Luso Esp. Neurol. Psiquiatr. 1989, 17, 59–67. [Google Scholar]
  43. Schory, T.J.; Piecznski, N.; Nair, S.; El-Mallakh, R.S. Barometric Pressure, Emergency Psychiatric Visits, and Violent Acts. Can. J. Psychiatry 2003, 48, 624–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Okuma, H.; Okuma, Y.; Kitagawa, Y. Examination of fluctuations in atmospheric pressure related to migraine. SpringerPlus 2015, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Frutos, A.M.; Sloan, C.D.; Merrill, R.M. Modeling the effects of atmospheric pressure on suicide rates in the USA using geographically weighted regression. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hiltunen, L.; Ruuhela, R.; Ostamo, A.; Lönnqvist, J.; Suominen, K.; Partonen, T. Atmospheric pressure and suicide attempts in Helsinki, Finland. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 1045–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mizoguchi, H.; Fukaya, K.; Mori, R.; Itoh, M.; Funakubo, M.; Sato, J. Lowering barometric pressure aggravates depression-like behavior in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 2011, 218, 190–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kesserwani, H. Migraine Triggers: An Overview of the Pharmacology, Biochemistry, Atmospherics, and Their Effects on Neural Networks. Cureus 2021, 13, 14243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hajat, S. Health effects of milder winters: A review of evidence from the United Kingdom. Environ. Health 2017, 16, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Donaldson, G.; Witt, C.; Näyhä, S. Changes in cold-related mortalities between 1995 and 2016 in South East England. Public Health 2019, 169, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Silveira, I.H.; Cortes, T.R.; Oliveira, B.F.A.; Junger, W.L. Temperature and cardiovascular mortality in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Effect modification by individual-level and neighbourhood-level factors. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2020, 75, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Culbertson, F.M. Depression and gender: An international review. Am. Psychol. 1997, 52, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kim, S.-Y.; Park, J.-H.; Lee, M.Y.; Oh, K.-S.; Shin, D.-W.; Shin, Y.-C. Physical activity and the prevention of depression: A cohort study. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2019, 60, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Villarreal-Zegarra, D.; Cabrera-Alva, M.; Carrillo-Larco, R.M.; Bernabe-Ortiz, A. Trends in the prevalence and treatment of depressive symptoms in Peru: A population-based study. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e036777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Huibers, M.J.; de Graaf, L.E.; Peeters, F.; Arntz, A. Does the weather make us sad? Meteorological determinants of mood and depression in the general population. Psychiatry Res. 2010, 180, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jayamohananan, H.; Kumar, M.K.M.; P, A.T. 5-HIAA as a Potential Biological Marker for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2019, 9, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Luykx, J.J.; Bakker, S.C.; Van Geloven, N.; Eijkemans, M.J.C.; Horváth, S.; Lentjes, E.; Boks, M.P.M.; Strengman, E.; Deyoung, J.E.; Buizer-Voskamp, J.; et al. Seasonal variation of serotonin turnover in human cerebrospinal fluid, depressive symptoms and the role of the 5-HTTLPR. Transl. Psychiatry 2013, 3, e311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oniszczenko, W. Affective Temperaments and Meteoropathy Among Women: A Cross-sectional Study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Infortuna, C.; Gratteri, F.; Benotakeia, A.; Patel, S.; Fleischman, A.; Muscatello, M.R.A.; Bruno, A.; Zoccali, R.A.; Chusid, E.; Han, Z.; et al. Exploring the Gender Difference and Predictors of Perceived Stress among Students Enrolled in Different Medical Programs: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Infortuna, C.; Mineo, L.; Buffer, S.; Thomas, F.P.; Muscatello, M.R.A.; Aguglia, E.; Bruno, A.; Zoccali, R.A.; Sheikh, A.; Chusid, E.; et al. Acute social and somatic stress alters cortical metaplasticity probed with non-invasive brain stimulation in humans. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2021, 170, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 19 05069 g001 550
Figure 1. The distribution of the rate of DS by meteorological factors during the cold and warm periods. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; †—the day before the survey; ††—2 days before the manifestation of depressive symptoms; RH—relative humidity; AP—atmospheric pressure; AT—apparent temperature.
Figure 1. The distribution of the rate of DS by meteorological factors during the cold and warm periods. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; †—the day before the survey; ††—2 days before the manifestation of depressive symptoms; RH—relative humidity; AP—atmospheric pressure; AT—apparent temperature.
Ijerph 19 05069 g001
Ijerph 19 05069 g002 550
Figure 2. The distribution of the rate of DS by the meteorological factors during the entire period. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; †—the day before the manifestation of depressive symptoms; ††—2 days before the manifestation of depressive symptoms; WS—wind speed.
Figure 2. The distribution of the rate of DS by the meteorological factors during the entire period. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; †—the day before the manifestation of depressive symptoms; ††—2 days before the manifestation of depressive symptoms; WS—wind speed.
Ijerph 19 05069 g002
Table
Table 1. Distribution of participants with depressive symptoms according to risk factors.
Table 1. Distribution of participants with depressive symptoms according to risk factors.
CharacteristicDepressive Symptoms N (%)p Value
NoYes
SexMale2655 (84.4)490 (15.6)<0.001
Female2659 (70.1)1133 (29.9)
Age groups (years)<50635 (79.1)168 (20.9)0.037
50–693994 (76.7)1213 (23.3)
≥70685 (73.9)242 (26.1)
* BMI (kg/m²)<251095 (76.9)329 (23.1)<0.001
25–29.92153 (78.8)579 (21.2)
≥302066 (74.3)715 (25.7)
Smoking status (male)Never1052 (86.7)163 (13.3)0.012
Former813 (83.7)158 (16.3)
Regular/occasional790 (82.2)171 (17.8)
Smoking status (female)Never2221 (70.5)931 (29.5)0.533
Former183 (67.5)88 (32.5)
Regular/occasional254 (69.0)114 (31.0)
Marital statusSingle200 (71.9)78 (28.1)<0.001
Married3889 (81.6)878 (18.4)
Divorced565 (67.0)278 (33.0)
Widowed597 (61.8)369 (38.2)
Cohabiting without marriage63 (75.9)20 (24.1)
EducationPrimary350 (71.0)143 (29.0)<0.001
Vocational469 (72.2)181 (27.8)
Secondary1454 (75.4)475 (24.6)
Advanced vocational1193 (74.9)400 (25.1)
University1848 (81.3)424 (18.7)
Ischemic heart diseaseYes935 (70.1)399 (29.9)<0.001
No4379 (78.2)1224 (21.8)
Medications taken for high blood pressure during the last 2 weeksYes1993 (73.0)739 (27.0)<0.001
No3310 (79.0)881 (21.0)
Physical activityYes4047 (78.1)1136 (21.9)<0.001
No1264 (72.3)485 (27.7)
* BMI—body mass index.
Table
Table 2. The risk of depressive symptoms in association with some sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, illnesses, and meteorological factors, adjusting for age.
Table 2. The risk of depressive symptoms in association with some sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, illnesses, and meteorological factors, adjusting for age.
VariableOR (95% CI)p
Female sex2.19 (1.90–2.54)<0.001
Smoking (former/regular/occasional)1.19 (1.03–1.37)0.015
Cohabiting without marriage1
Single1.40 (1.06–1.86)0.020
Divorced/widowed1.92 (1.69–2.18)<0.001
Education (university)1
Education (primary/vocational)1.57 (1.31–1.88)<0.001
Education (secondary/advanced vocational)1.36 (1.19–1.56)<0.001
IHD1.39 (1.21–1.61)<0.001
AH1.25 (1.11–1.41)<0.001
Physical inactivity1.49 (1.31–1.70)<0.001
November-December1.25 (1.06–1.48)0.008
Relative humidity < 94% with a lag of 2 days1.32 (1.07–1.61)0.009
Rising wind (WS on the previous day < 6 & WS > 4.5)1.31 (1.14–1.49)<0.001
Snowfall during the cold period 2 days before1.28 (1.01–1.64)0.042
Temperature > 14.2 °C with a lag of 2 days0.79 (0.67–0.93)0.006
IHD—ischemic heart disease, AH—arterial hypertension. For males, rising WS and AP below 1009 hPa were associated with a higher risk of DS (ORs with 95% CI were 1.40 (1.11–1.75) and 1.28 (1.04–1.59), respectively), and a higher T had a protective effect (Table 3). For females, a higher risk of DS was observed during March–April and November–December, two days after the snowfall, a day after RH < 82.5%, and on days of some variation in WS described as rising WS (Table 3).
Table
Table 3. The risk of depressive symptoms depending on meteorological factors according to sex (adjusting for age).
Table 3. The risk of depressive symptoms depending on meteorological factors according to sex (adjusting for age).
VariableOR (95% CI)p
Males
Rising wind (WS on the previous day < 6 & WS > 4.5)1.40 (1.11–1.75)0.004
Temperature > 14.2 °C with a lag of 2 days0.69 (0.51–0.93)0.013
Atmospheric pressure < 1009 hPa with a lag of 2 days1.28 (1.04–1.59)0.023
Females
March–April1.24 (1.04–1.49)0.020
November–December1.38 (1.12–1.70)0.002
Rising wind (WS on the previous day < 6 & WS > 4.5)1.28 (1.09–1.51)0.003
Snowfall at cold period before 2 days 1.55 (1.16–2.07)0.004
Relative humidity < 83% on the previous day1.26 (1.08–1.48)0.004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brazienė, A.; Venclovienė, J.; Vaičiulis, V.; Lukšienė, D.; Tamošiūnas, A.; Milvidaitė, I.; Radišauskas, R.; Bobak, M. Relationship between Depressive Symptoms and Weather Conditions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095069

AMA Style

Brazienė A, Venclovienė J, Vaičiulis V, Lukšienė D, Tamošiūnas A, Milvidaitė I, Radišauskas R, Bobak M. Relationship between Depressive Symptoms and Weather Conditions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(9):5069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brazienė, Agnė, Jonė Venclovienė, Vidmantas Vaičiulis, Dalia Lukšienė, Abdonas Tamošiūnas, Irena Milvidaitė, Ričardas Radišauskas, and Martin Bobak. 2022. "Relationship between Depressive Symptoms and Weather Conditions" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 9: 5069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095069

APA Style

Brazienė, A., Venclovienė, J., Vaičiulis, V., Lukšienė, D., Tamošiūnas, A., Milvidaitė, I., Radišauskas, R., & Bobak, M. (2022). Relationship between Depressive Symptoms and Weather Conditions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095069

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop