Next Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence Systems Assisting in the Assessment of the Course and Retention of Orthodontic Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Knowledge and Attitude towards Clinical Trials among General Population of Northern Saudi Arabia during COVID-19 Era: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Mobile Patient Information Assistant (PIA) App during the Inpatient Surgical Hospital Stay: Evaluation of Usability and Patient Approval

by
Magdalena Görtz
1,2,*,
Antonia Wendeborn
3,
Michael Müller
4 and
Markus Hohenfellner
1
1
Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
2
Junior Clinical Cooperation Unit ‘Multiparametric Methods for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer’, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
3
Medical Faculty, Ruprecht-Karls University of Heidelberg, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
4
mbits Imaging GmbH, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2023, 11(5), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050682
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 14 February 2023 / Accepted: 21 February 2023 / Published: 25 February 2023

Abstract

Mobile eHealth apps are becoming increasingly important tools in healthcare management, capable of providing education and support at any time. There is little knowledge about surgical patients’ appreciation and use of these apps. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a user-friendly medical app (PIA; Patient Information Assistant) for providing individual patient information before and after inpatient urological surgery. Twenty-two patients aged 35 to 75 years were provided with timely information, push notifications, and personalized agendas (e.g., date of presentation, time of surgery, time of doctor’s consultation, imaging appointment) via the PIA app. Of the 22 patients, 19 evaluated the PIA app in terms of usage and usability, benefits, and potential for improvement. Of the study participants, 95% did not need any assistance to use the app, 74% confirmed that the PIA app made them feel better informed and more satisfied with their hospital stay, and 89% stated that they would like to re-use the PIA app and support the general use of medical apps in healthcare. Thus, we created an innovative digital health information tool, allowing targeted support for doctor–nurse–patient communication and offering great potential for patient support before and after surgery. Our study revealed that use of an app during the surgical hospital stay is readily accepted and benefits patients by acting as an additional informative tool.
Keywords: electronic health; hospital; medical app; mobile health; surgery; telemedicine electronic health; hospital; medical app; mobile health; surgery; telemedicine

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Görtz, M.; Wendeborn, A.; Müller, M.; Hohenfellner, M. The Mobile Patient Information Assistant (PIA) App during the Inpatient Surgical Hospital Stay: Evaluation of Usability and Patient Approval. Healthcare 2023, 11, 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050682

AMA Style

Görtz M, Wendeborn A, Müller M, Hohenfellner M. The Mobile Patient Information Assistant (PIA) App during the Inpatient Surgical Hospital Stay: Evaluation of Usability and Patient Approval. Healthcare. 2023; 11(5):682. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050682

Chicago/Turabian Style

Görtz, Magdalena, Antonia Wendeborn, Michael Müller, and Markus Hohenfellner. 2023. "The Mobile Patient Information Assistant (PIA) App during the Inpatient Surgical Hospital Stay: Evaluation of Usability and Patient Approval" Healthcare 11, no. 5: 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050682

APA Style

Görtz, M., Wendeborn, A., Müller, M., & Hohenfellner, M. (2023). The Mobile Patient Information Assistant (PIA) App during the Inpatient Surgical Hospital Stay: Evaluation of Usability and Patient Approval. Healthcare, 11(5), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050682

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop