Next Article in Journal
Using eZIS to Predict Progression from MCI to Dementia in Three Years
Next Article in Special Issue
Lightweight and Low-Parametric Network for Hardware Inference of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Previous Article in Journal
Gray-Scale Extraction of Bone Features from Chest Radiographs Based on Deep Learning Technique for Personal Identification and Classification in Forensic Medicine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Accuracy Evaluation of GPT-Assisted Differential Diagnosis in Emergency Department

by
Fatemeh Shah-Mohammadi
and
Joseph Finkelstein
*
Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2024, 14(16), 1779; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161779
Submission received: 9 July 2024 / Revised: 10 August 2024 / Accepted: 13 August 2024 / Published: 15 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI-Assisted Diagnostics in Telemedicine and Digital Health)

Abstract

In emergency department (ED) settings, rapid and precise diagnostic evaluations are critical to ensure better patient outcomes and efficient healthcare delivery. This study assesses the accuracy of differential diagnosis lists generated by the third-generation ChatGPT (ChatGPT-3.5) and the fourth-generation ChatGPT (ChatGPT-4) based on electronic health record notes recorded within the first 24 h of ED admission. These models process unstructured text to formulate a ranked list of potential diagnoses. The accuracy of these models was benchmarked against actual discharge diagnoses to evaluate their utility as diagnostic aids. Results indicated that both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 reasonably accurately predicted diagnoses at the body system level, with GPT-4 slightly outperforming its predecessor. However, their performance at the more granular category level was inconsistent, often showing decreased precision. Notably, GPT-4 demonstrated improved accuracy in several critical categories that underscores its advanced capabilities in managing complex clinical scenarios.
Keywords: emergency department; differential diagnosis; GPT; patient outcomes emergency department; differential diagnosis; GPT; patient outcomes

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shah-Mohammadi, F.; Finkelstein, J. Accuracy Evaluation of GPT-Assisted Differential Diagnosis in Emergency Department. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161779

AMA Style

Shah-Mohammadi F, Finkelstein J. Accuracy Evaluation of GPT-Assisted Differential Diagnosis in Emergency Department. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(16):1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161779

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shah-Mohammadi, Fatemeh, and Joseph Finkelstein. 2024. "Accuracy Evaluation of GPT-Assisted Differential Diagnosis in Emergency Department" Diagnostics 14, no. 16: 1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161779

APA Style

Shah-Mohammadi, F., & Finkelstein, J. (2024). Accuracy Evaluation of GPT-Assisted Differential Diagnosis in Emergency Department. Diagnostics, 14(16), 1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161779

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop