Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Patient Benefits from the Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap in Elderly Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Advancing Tissue Engineering Through a Portable Perfusion and Incubation System
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Modeling of Cardiac Electrophysiology with Human Realistic Heart–Torso Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Decellularization of Human Digits: A Step Towards Off-the-Shelf Composite Allograft Transplantation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Towards a Better Understanding of the Human Health Risk of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Using Organoid Models

1
School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China
2
Key Lab of Visual Damage and Regeneration & Restoration of Chongqing, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China
3
Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
4
Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2025, 12(4), 393; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12040393
Submission received: 17 February 2025 / Revised: 16 March 2025 / Accepted: 28 March 2025 / Published: 7 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The New Frontiers of Artificial Organs Engineering)

Abstract

:
The ubiquitous presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment has garnered global public concern. Epidemiological studies have proved that exposure to PFAS is associated with human health risks. Although evidence demonstrated the toxic mechanisms of PFAS based on animal models and traditional cell cultures, their limitations in inter-species differences and lack of human-relevant microenvironments hinder the understanding of health risks from PFAS exposure. There is an increasing necessity to explore alternative methodologies that can effectively evaluate human health risks. Human organoids derived from stem cells accurately mimic the sophisticated and multicellular structures of native human organs, providing promising models for toxicology research. Advanced organoids combined with innovative technologies are expected to improve understanding of the breadth and depth of PFAS toxicity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of more than 10,000 fluorinated synthetic chemicals whose structures contain at least one fully fluorinated methyl or methylene carbon atom. PFAS are often referred to as “forever chemicals” because of their innate chemical stability [1]. PFAS are ubiquitously present in natural environments due to their widespread use and persistent nature, resulting in pollution problems of unprecedented scale [2]. PFAS have been detected in rivers, soil, air, house dust, and the food supply [3,4]. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) are two of the most used PFAS in various applications. Although they have been phased out, materials containing PFOA and PFOS are still used in consumer and industrial products. Thus, humans are continuously exposed to them. In response, an array of emerging PFAS have been used to replace PFOS and PFOA and are also increasingly detected in environmental and human samples [1,5,6,7,8].
Given ubiquitous exposure and long half-lives, it is critical to understand the adverse effects of PFAS. Traditional animal and cell line models are commonly used to identify and predict potential adverse effects of PFAS on humans. However, animal models did not accurately predict the toxic responses in humans [9,10]. Moreover, using experimental animals is limited by ethical issues and does not comply with the 3R principles (replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal studies) [11]. Traditional two-dimensional (2D) cell assays cannot mimic the human-relevant physiological microenvironments [12]. Three-dimensional (3D) organoid models represent new in vitro models that will complement existing cell lines and animal models to a certain extent [13,14,15]. Organoid toxic tests are expected to be novel alternative methods in environmental toxicology [16,17,18].

2. PFAS Pose Threats to Human Health

The primary routes of human exposure to PFAS include contaminated water, food, air, and consumer and personal care products [19,20]. Drinking water is the most significant source of human exposure to PFAS (Figure 1) [21]. Scientists estimated that over 200 million people in the United States are served by PFAS-contaminated water at a concentration of 1 part per trillion [22]. The data from a nationwide prospective cohort of United States women in the Nurse’s Health Study demonstrated that tap water contributes to plasma concentrations of PFAS [23]. Occupational exposure to PFAS can be another source of fluorochemical workers, firefighters, and electronic waste workers [24,25,26,27]. Increasing epidemiological studies have demonstrated that PFAS exposure is positively associated with adverse human health outcomes, including cancers (e.g., testicular, kidney, prostate, bladder, breast, and ovarian cancers), immune disruption, liver damage, adverse reproductive effects, and developmental delays [4,23,28]. For instance, serum PFOA levels were positively related to renal cell carcinoma [29,30,31]. Although PFOA exposure was found to induce histological and cellular changes in renal tubules in animal models [31,32], its underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
Since PFAS have been ubiquitously detected in human blood, a strong positive association between serum PFAS concentrations and cardiovascular risk has been widely identified [25]. A previous study showed that PFOA-induced cardiac malformations and dysfunction could be mediated by oxidative stress, which was caused by activating the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway [33]. Moreover, studies have proved that PFAS can penetrate the blood-placental barrier and enter the fetus from the maternal side, posing threats to fetal development [34,35,36]. Prenatal exposure to PFOA impaired the competence of maturing oocytes and reduced the yield of oocytes in the progeny mice [37]. However, human response to PFAS exposure has not been clearly defined because of insufficient epidemiological data and human-relevant models.

3. Potential of Human Organoids in PFAS Toxicity Assessment

Organoid is a self-organized 3D tissue that can be derived from stem cells and tissue cells, which simulate the key structure, function, and biological complexity of the native organ [38,39]. Since the first in vitro 3D intestinal organoid was established by Clevers’ lab in 2009, organoid technology has rapidly advanced over the past decade [39,40]. To date, various organoids, such as brain, retinal, kidney, cardiac, airway, and liver organoids, have been successfully established. Existing evidence has emphasized the importance of human organoids in modeling diseases, drug discovery, and precision medicine [41,42]. More recently, the application of human organoids has greatly expanded the scope of predictive toxicology research [10].
Human exposure to environmental toxicants occurs mainly through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal absorption, so human organoids of corresponding systems are employed for toxicity assessment (Figure 1). For instance, lung organoids were established to reveal the impacts of diesel exhaust particles (DEP) on the alveolar progenitor niche [43]. Human lung bud tip progenitor organoids were also used to evaluate the elemental toxicity of particulate matter (PM2.5) [44]. PM2.5-induced effects on the proliferation and differentiation of lung organoids partially involved the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Given that previous research has proved the lung toxicity of PFAS, lung organoids are expected to reveal the potential toxicity of PFAS to the human lungs and their toxicity mechanisms [45,46,47].
The primary pathway for human exposure to PFAS is the consumption of contaminated food and water [48]. The existing gastrointestinal organoids, such as intestinal, colon, and stomach organoids, can mimic the structure and function of the intestinal epithelium, enabling the capture of toxicant-induced gastrointestinal toxicities [49,50]. It was reported that PFOS exposure influenced the absorption function of the intestinal epithelium in intestinal organoids [48]. PFOS-induced absorption of fatty acids and formation of lipid droplets were mediated through the regulation of the PPARα pathway. The effect of PFOS on activating the PPARα pathway of intestinal organoids was stronger than that of PFOA [48].
The skin is the largest human organ and is continuously exposed to environmental toxicants. The phasing out of animal testing for cosmetic products has facilitated the development of human organoid models. A cyst-like skin organoid comprising stratified epidermis, fat-rich dermis, pigmented hair follicles, and sebaceous glands has been generated, equivalent to human fetuses’ facial skin [51]. Dermal absorption is supposed to be an important pathway of human exposure to PFAS [52]. Hence, skin organoids hold great potential for assessing PFAS toxicity in the future.
Enormous organoids have been used to decipher the possible neurotoxicity, hepatoxicity and kidney toxicity of compounds due to their transport, accumulation, and biotransformation in the human body. For instance, brain organoids were employed to illustrate the potential neurotoxicity of the PFAS mixture (PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS). PFAS-exposed brain organoids exhibited amyloid beta accumulation and tau phosphorylation, which were Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)-like phenotypes [53]. Consistently, developmental PFOS exposure was identified as a potential risk factor for late-onset AD in CD-1 mice [54]. Treatments of liver organoids with short-chain PFAS induced the loss of architectural complexity and aberrant cytological features [55]. Given that exposure to PFAS poses threats to the human reproductive system, ovarian, trophoblast, and placental organoids might help to illustrate their potential reproductive toxicity [56,57,58,59].

4. Advances and Challenges of Human Organoids

Human organoids share similar microstructure and morphology with their source organs/tissues; observing the morphological changes and growth characteristics by a microscope is a simple and convenient method to determine the toxic effects of toxins (Figure 2). For example, the decreased area and thickness of retina epithelial structures were found after retinal organoid exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) [60]. Fluorescence imaging from immunofluorescent staining also offers a specific visualization option that will allow for identifying cell types and their arrangement in proper layers within organoids. The quantification of specific cell markers and live/death assay enables tracking organoid growth and development upon pollutant exposure. Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was found to inhibit cell proliferation, induce apoptosis, and disrupt cell migration in cortical organoids [61].
The “omics” technologies, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics, have been employed to explain or predict the toxic mechanisms. Omics-based approaches offer valuable insight into potential biomarkers of organoid responses under stress (Figure 2). For instance, RNA sequencing was applied to illustrate the underlying molecular mechanisms of bisphenol-induced retinal toxicity in retinal organoids [10]. Bisphenol treatment also induced distinct proteomic changes in mammary gland organoids [62]. Metabolomics has been employed to uncover the active metabolic pathways involved in fatty acid metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, necroptosis, and autophagy pathways under nanoparticle stress in intestinal organoids [63]. Currently, integration strategies of multi-omics data are used to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the toxicological mechanisms of environmental pollutants. The integrated networks of altered metabolites and differentially expressed genes revealed that PBDE-induced retinal toxicity was closely associated with glutathione metabolism and oxidative stress [60]. Recent technological advances in single-cell manipulation offer unprecedented opportunities for profiling genes and proteins at a single-cell resolution. Unlike conventional omics approaches, cutting-edge single-cell omics profiling technologies provide novel insight into the mechanisms of responses to toxicants of individual cells within organoids [64]. Single-cell RNA sequencing data of intestinal organoids revealed the adverse impact of bisphenol A and its substitute, fluorene-9-bisphenol, on intestinal homeostasis [65]. The differentiation trajectory of the intestinal cells was significantly influenced after chemical exposure. The emergence of spatial multi-omics has promoted the development of single-cell sequencing [66]. Deciphering the spatiotemporal omics profile of organoids at the single-cell level will accelerate the development of toxicity assessment and advance the understanding of the toxic mechanisms of PFAS [67].
Notably, traditional organoid models suffer from considerable variability and heterogeneity [68]. Engineering strategies based on advanced technologies have been applied to increase organoid reproducibility. For instance, biomaterials, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based hydrogels, can be designed to promote reproducible intestinal organoid formation [69]. Furthermore, the potential of organoid technology was hindered by the low-level maturity and functions due to the lack of stromal, vascular, and immunological components [38]. Great progress has been made in enhancing vascularization and immunization by incorporating organoids with endothelial and immune cells [70,71,72]. Critically, organ crosstalk and communications between different cell types play a fundamental role in maintaining whole-body homeostasis; individual organoids cannot construct a multi-organ system in vivo. Organs-on-a-chip, engineered or natural miniature tissues grown inside microfluidic chips, provide microphysiological environments for organoid systems [73,74]. Cardiac organoid-on-a-chip and brain organoid-on-a-chip have been applied to investigate polystyrene nanoplastic-induced cardiotoxicity and nicotine-induced neurotoxicity, respectively [75,76]. Such capabilities have recently been demonstrated by an integrated multi-organoid platform comprising the liver, cardiac, lung, vascular, testis, colon, and brain organoids [77]. The multi-organoid system shows great advantages in modeling the metabolism and downstream effects of drugs between multiple tissues [77,78,79]. Human organoids-on-a-chip will be performed to reveal the systematic toxicity of PFAS in the near future.

5. Conclusions

Despite human organoids promoting the development of toxicology, the application of organoids in PFAS toxicity assessment is still in its infancy. One aspect is that PFAS exerts persistently toxic effects, but the high cost inhibits their long-term observation. Another aspect is that humans are simultaneously exposed to multiple PFAS rather than individual chemicals. Thus, organoids combined with state-of-the-art technologies and advanced calculation methods are expected to be developed to illustrate the toxicity of PFAS. Recent organoid-on-a-chip microfluidic devices have enabled high-throughput toxicity assessment, thus promoting the understanding of the potential effects of all PFAS species on human health [78,80]. Moreover, the organoid-on-a-chip system offers the possibility to study the biotransformation and metabolism of labile PFAS in human organs, which cannot be mimicked in traditional cell cultures and animal models [73,74,79,81]. Organoid-on-a-chip also offers advantages over traditional 2D cultures in maintaining the interactions between cells and organs, simulating human-relevant physiological conditions, and greater cellular diversity [16,82].
All in all, human organoid models provide a promising platform to determine the potential toxicity of PFAS and mechanisms of action. Evidence from epidemiological studies will benefit in verifying the relationship between human health and PFAS exposure. Once deleterious effects are identified, adverse health outcomes are not easily reversed due to the technical challenge. Thus, preventative upstream actions are critical to minimizing the impact of PFAS on human health.

Author Contributions

H.X.: writing—original draft; J.K. and X.G.: writing—review and editing and visualization; Y.L. and M.L.: writing—review and editing and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82204083).

Data Availability Statement

No data were used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cousins, I.T.; DeWitt, J.C.; Gluge, J.; Goldenman, G.; Herzke, D.; Lohmann, R.; Ng, C.A.; Scheringer, M.; Wang, Z. The high persistence of PFAS is sufficient for their management as a chemical class. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2020, 22, 2307–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Scheringer, M. Innovate beyond PFAS. Science 2023, 381, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alazaiza, M.Y.D.; Alzghoul, T.M.; Ramu, M.B.; Abu Amr, S.S.; Abushammala, M.F.M. PFAS contamination and mitigation: A comprehensive analysis of research trends and global contributions. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2025, 11, 101127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sunderland, E.M.; Hu, X.C.; Dassuncao, C.; Tokranov, A.K.; Wagner, C.C.; Allen, J.G. A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2019, 29, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ng, C.; Cousins, I.T.; DeWitt, J.C.; Gluge, J.; Goldenman, G.; Herzke, D.; Lohmann, R.; Miller, M.; Patton, S.; Scheringer, M.; et al. Addressing Urgent Questions for PFAS in the 21st Century. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 12755–12765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Borghese, M.M.; Ward, A.; MacPherson, S.; Manz, K.E.; Atlas, E.; Fisher, M.; Arbuckle, T.E.; Braun, J.M.; Bouchard, M.F.; Ashley-Martin, J. Serum concentrations of legacy, alternative, and precursor per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: A descriptive analysis of adult female participants in the MIREC-ENDO study. Environ. Health A Glob. Access Sci. Source 2024, 23, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ateia, M.; Scheringer, M. From “forever chemicals” to fluorine-free alternatives. Science 2024, 385, 256–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hamid, N.; Junaid, M.; Sultan, M.; Yoganandham, S.T.; Chuan, O.M. The untold story of PFAS alternatives: Insights into the occurrence, ecotoxicological impacts, and removal strategies in the aquatic environment. Water Res. 2024, 250, 121044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Van Norman, G.A. Limitations of Animal Studies for Predicting Toxicity in Clinical Trials: Is it Time to Rethink Our Current Approach? JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2019, 4, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, M.; Gong, J.; Gao, L.; Zou, T.; Kang, J.; Xu, H. Advanced human developmental toxicity and teratogenicity assessment using human organoid models. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 235, 113429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kiani, A.K.; Pheby, D.; Henehan, G.; Brown, R.; Sieving, P.; Sykora, P.; Marks, R.; Falsini, B.; Capodicasa, N.; Miertus, S.; et al. Ethical considerations regarding animal experimentation. J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 2022, 63, E255–E266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Borah, A.; Kumar, D.S. Overcoming the barriers of two-dimensional cell culture systems with three-dimensional cell culture systems: Techniques, drug discovery, and biomedical applications. In Biomedical Product and Materials Evaluation; Mohanan, P.V., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2022; pp. 179–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fang, G.; Chen, Y.-C.; Lu, H.; Jin, D. Advances in Spheroids and Organoids on a Chip. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2215043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Law, A.M.K.; Rodriguez de la Fuente, L.; Grundy, T.J.; Fang, G.; Valdes-Mora, F.; Gallego-Ortega, D. Advancements in 3D Cell Culture Systems for Personalizing Anti-Cancer Therapies. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 782766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, J.; Koo, B.K.; Knoblich, J.A. Human organoids: Model systems for human biology and medicine. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 571–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, X.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhong, H.; Cai, X.; Guan, R. Recent progress on the organoids: Techniques, advantages and applications. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2025, 185, 117942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fang, Y.; Akhtar, H.; Wang, J. The application of organoids in toxicity test of environmental pollutants. Cell Organoid 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kwak, E.; Peng, G. Human-Organoid-Based In Vitro Modeling for Environmental Toxicology. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2024, 11, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. DeLuca, N.M.; Minucci, J.M.; Mullikin, A.; Slover, R.; Cohen Hubal, E.A. Human exposure pathways to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from indoor media: A systematic review. Environ. Int. 2022, 162, 107149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Holder, C.; DeLuca, N.; Luh, J.; Alexander, P.; Minucci, J.M.; Vallero, D.A.; Thomas, K.; Cohen Hubal, E.A. Systematic Evidence Mapping of Potential Exposure Pathways for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Based on Measured Occurrence in Multiple Media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 5107–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ackerman Grunfeld, D.; Gilbert, D.; Hou, J.; Jones, A.M.; Lee, M.J.; Kibbey, T.C.G.; O’Carroll, D.M. Underestimated burden of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in global surface waters and groundwaters. Nat. Geosci. 2024, 17, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Andrews, D.Q.; Naidenko, O.V. Population-Wide Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Drinking Water in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, X.C.; Tokranov, A.K.; Liddie, J.; Zhang, X.; Grandjean, P.; Hart, J.E.; Laden, F.; Sun, Q.; Yeung, L.W.Y.; Sunderland, E.M. Tap Water Contributions to Plasma Concentrations of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort of U.S. Women. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 67006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Christensen, B.T.; Calkins, M.M. Occupational exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: A scope review of the literature from 1980–2021. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2023, 33, 673–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schlezinger, J.J.; Gokce, N. Perfluoroalkyl/Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Links to Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Circ. Res. 2024, 134, 1136–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lucas, K.; Gaines, L.G.T.; Paris-Davila, T.; Nylander-French, L.A. Occupational exposure and serum levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A review. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2023, 66, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, L.; Cheng, Z.; Zhu, H.; Chen, H.; Yao, Y.; Baqar, M.; Yu, H.; Qiao, B.; Sun, H. Electronic-waste-associated pollution of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: Environmental occurrence and human exposure. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 451, 131204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fenton, S.E.; Ducatman, A.; Boobis, A.; DeWitt, J.C.; Lau, C.; Ng, C.; Smith, J.S.; Roberts, S.M. Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Toxicity and Human Health Review: Current State of Knowledge and Strategies for Informing Future Research. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2021, 40, 606–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Winquist, A.; Hodge, J.M.; Diver, W.R.; Rodriguez, J.L.; Troeschel, A.N.; Daniel, J.; Teras, L.R. Case-Cohort Study of the Association between PFAS and Selected Cancers among Participants in the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Prevention Study II LifeLink Cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 2023, 131, 127007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shearer, J.J.; Callahan, C.L.; Calafat, A.M.; Huang, W.-Y.; Jones, R.R.; Sabbisetti, V.S.; Freedman, N.D.; Sampson, J.N.; Silverman, D.T.; Purdue, M.P.; et al. Serum Concentrations of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2021, 113, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, D.; Yan, S.; Wang, P.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Y.; Cui, J.; Liang, Y.; Ren, S.; Gao, Y. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) exposure in relation to the kidneys: A review of current available literature. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1103141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stanifer, J.W.; Stapleton, H.M.; Souma, T.; Wittmer, A.; Zhao, X.; Boulware, L.E. Perfluorinated Chemicals as Emerging Environmental Threats to Kidney Health: A Scoping Review. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. CJASN 2018, 13, 1479–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, X.; Chen, R.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Xia, M.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; Yin, W.; Han, Y.; Yu, M. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) induces cardiotoxicity by activating the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 285, 117098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhao, M.; Yin, N.; Yang, R.; Li, S.; Zhang, S.; Faiola, F. Assessment and Comparison of Early Developmental Toxicity of Six Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances with Human Embryonic Stem Cell Models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 8215–8227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lu, Y.; Meng, L.; Ma, D.; Cao, H.; Liang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G. The occurrence of PFAS in human placenta and their binding abilities to human serum albumin and organic anion transporter 4. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 273, 116460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, H.; Wei, S.; Li, J.; Zhong, Z.; Chen, D. Transplacental transport of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Mechanism exploration via BeWo cell monolayer model. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 466, 133205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Du, H.; Song, L.; Zhao, M.; Zhao, X.; Mu, R.; Gao, S.; Zhang, B.; Wang, J. Prenatal Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) exposure causes reproductive toxicity by disrupting the formation of transzonal projections (TZPs) and down-regulating Wnt4/β-catenin signaling pathway in progeny. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 291, 117816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, Z.; Chen, X.; Dowbaj, A.M.; Sljukic, A.; Bratlie, K.; Lin, L.; Fong, E.L.S.; Balachander, G.M.; Chen, Z.; Soragni, A.; et al. Organoids. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2022, 2, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Clevers, H. Modeling Development and Disease with Organoids. Cell 2016, 165, 1586–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sato, T.; Vries, R.G.; Snippert, H.J.; van de Wetering, M.; Barker, N.; Stange, D.E.; van Es, J.H.; Abo, A.; Kujala, P.; Peters, P.J.; et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 2009, 459, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Verstegen, M.M.A.; Coppes, R.P.; Beghin, A.; De Coppi, P.; Gerli, M.F.M.; de Graeff, N.; Pan, Q.; Saito, Y.; Shi, S.; Zadpoor, A.A.; et al. Clinical applications of human organoids. Nat. Med. 2025, 31, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yao, Q.; Cheng, S.; Pan, Q.; Yu, J.; Cao, G.; Li, L.; Cao, H. Organoids: Development and applications in disease models, drug discovery, precision medicine, and regenerative medicine. MedComm 2024, 5, e735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, X.; Ciminieri, C.; Bos, I.S.T.; Woest, M.E.; D’Ambrosi, A.; Wardenaar, R.; Spierings, D.C.J.; Königshoff, M.; Schmidt, M.; Kistemaker, L.E.M.; et al. Diesel exhaust particles distort lung epithelial progenitors and their fibroblast niche. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 305, 119292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, R.; Kang, N.; Zhang, W.; Chen, B.; Xu, S.; Wu, L. The developmental toxicity of PM2.5 on the early stages of fetal lung with human lung bud tip progenitor organoids. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 330, 121764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Philippat, C.; Coiffier, O.; Lyon-Caen, S.; Boudier, A.; Jovanovic, N.; Quentin, J.; Gioria, Y.; Haug, L.S.; Thomsen, C.; Bayat, S.; et al. In utero exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances and children respiratory health in the three first years of life. Environ. Res. 2023, 234, 116544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rafiee, A.; Faridi, S.; Sly, P.D.; Stone, L.; Kennedy, L.P.; Mahabee-Gittens, E.M. Asthma and decreased lung function in children exposed to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): An updated meta-analysis unveiling research gaps. Environ. Res. 2024, 262, 119827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, Z.; Yang, T.; Zhou, R.; Yang, C.; Huang, Q.; Cheng, S. Impact of polyfluoroalkyl chemicals and volatile organic compounds exposure on lung function of American adults. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 363, 125152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, W.; Tian, Y.; Chen, B.; Xu, S.; Wu, L. PFOA/PFOS Facilitated Intestinal Fatty Acid Absorption by Activating the PPARα Pathway: Insights from Organoids Model. Environ. Health 2024, 2, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hou, Z.; Meng, R.; Chen, G.; Lai, T.; Qing, R.; Hao, S.; Deng, J.; Wang, B. Distinct accumulation of nanoplastics in human intestinal organoids. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 838, 155811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Park, S.B.; Jung, W.H.; Choi, K.J.; Koh, B.; Kim, K.Y. A Comparative Systematic Analysis of The Influence of Microplastics on Colon Cells, Mouse and Colon Organoids. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2023, 20, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lee, J.; Rabbani, C.C.; Gao, H.; Steinhart, M.R.; Woodruff, B.M.; Pflum, Z.E.; Kim, A.; Heller, S.; Liu, Y.; Shipchandler, T.Z.; et al. Hair-bearing human skin generated entirely from pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2020, 582, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ragnarsdóttir, O.; Abdallah, M.A.-E.; Harrad, S. Dermal uptake: An important pathway of human exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances? Environ. Pollut. 2022, 307, 119478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lu, S.; Zhu, X.; Zeng, P.; Hu, L.; Huang, Y.; Guo, X.; Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.; Lai, L.; Xue, A.; et al. Exposure to PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS induces Alzheimer’s disease-like neuropathology in cerebral organoids. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 363, 125098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Basaly, V.; Hill, J.; Bihaqi, S.W.; Marques, E.; Slitt, A.L.; Zawia, N.H. Developmental Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) exposure as a potential risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in CD-1 mice and SH-SY5Y cells. NeuroToxicology 2021, 86, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Palazzolo, S.; Caligiuri, I.; Sfriso, A.A.; Mauceri, M.; Rotondo, R.; Campagnol, D.; Canzonieri, V.; Rizzolio, F. Early Warnings by Liver Organoids on Short- and Long-Chain PFAS Toxicity. Toxics 2022, 10, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shi, W.; Zhang, Z.; Li, M.; Dong, H.; Li, J. Reproductive toxicity of PFOA, PFOS and their substitutes: A review based on epidemiological and toxicological evidence. Environ. Res. 2024, 250, 118485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, X.; Zheng, M.; Xu, B.; Li, D.; Shen, Y.; Nie, Y.; Ma, L.; Wu, J. Generation of offspring-producing 3D ovarian organoids derived from female germline stem cells and their application in toxicological detection. Biomaterials 2021, 279, 121213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hori, T.; Okae, H.; Shibata, S.; Kobayashi, N.; Kobayashi, E.H.; Oike, A.; Sekiya, A.; Arima, T.; Kaji, H. Trophoblast stem cell-based organoid models of the human placental barrier. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xu, C.; Ma, H.; Gao, F.; Zhang, C.; Hu, W.; Jia, Y.; Xu, J.; Hu, J. Screening of Organophosphate Flame Retardants with Placentation-Disrupting Effects in Human Trophoblast Organoid Model and Characterization of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Mice. Environ. Health Perspect. 2022, 130, 057002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Li, M.; Zeng, Y.; Ge, L.; Gong, J.; Weng, C.; Yang, C.; Yang, J.; Fang, Y.; Li, Q.; Zou, T.; et al. Evaluation of the influences of low dose polybrominated diphenyl ethers exposure on human early retinal development. Environ. Int. 2022, 163, 107187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yang, L.; Zou, J.; Zang, Z.; Wang, L.; Du, Z.; Zhang, D.; Cai, Y.; Li, M.; Li, Q.; Gao, J.; et al. Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate exposure impairs cortical development in hESC-derived cerebral organoids. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 865, 161251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Winkler, J.; Liu, P.; Phong, K.; Hinrichs, J.H.; Ataii, N.; Williams, K.; Hadler-Olsen, E.; Samson, S.; Gartner, Z.J.; Fisher, S.; et al. Bisphenol A replacement chemicals, BPF and BPS, induce protumorigenic changes in human mammary gland organoid morphology and proteome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2115308119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Xuan, L.; Luo, J.; Qu, C.; Guo, P.; Yi, W.; Yang, J.; Yan, Y.; Guan, H.; Zhou, P.; Huang, R. Predictive metabolomic signatures for safety assessment of three plastic nanoparticles using intestinal organoids. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 913, 169606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, Y.; Chen, L.; Yu, J.; Ye, L.; Hu, H.; Wang, J.; Wu, B. Advances in Single-Cell Toxicogenomics in Environmental Toxicology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 11132–11145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Peng, J.; Cao, S.; Hu, Z.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Sheng, X.; Cai, Z.; Bai, R.; Xiong, X.; Sheng, J. Heterogeneity effects of bisphenol A and its substitute, fluorene-9-bisphenol, on intestinal homeostasis. Environ. Int. 2024, 191, 108948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Dorgau, B.; Collin, J.; Rozanska, A.; Boczonadi, V.; Moya-Molina, M.; Unsworth, A.; Hussain, R.; Coxhead, J.; Dhanaseelan, T.; Armstrong, L.; et al. Deciphering the spatiotemporal transcriptional and chromatin accessibility of human retinal organoid development at the single-cell level. iScience 2024, 27, 109397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lan, Y.; Gao, X.; Xu, H.; Li, M. 20 years of polybrominated diphenyl ethers on toxicity assessments. Water Res. 2023, 249, 121007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hofer, M.; Lutolf, M.P. Engineering organoids. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 402–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Gjorevski, N.; Sachs, N.; Manfrin, A.; Giger, S.; Bragina, M.E.; Ordóñez-Morán, P.; Clevers, H.; Lutolf, M.P. Designer matrices for intestinal stem cell and organoid culture. Nature 2016, 539, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, M.; Gao, L.; Zhao, L.; Zou, T.; Xu, H. Toward the next generation of vascularized human neural organoids. Med. Res. Rev. 2023, 43, 31–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cakir, B.; Xiang, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Kural, M.H.; Parent, M.; Kang, Y.-J.; Chapeton, K.; Patterson, B.; Yuan, Y.; He, C.-S.; et al. Engineering of human brain organoids with a functional vascular-like system. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 1169–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Schafer, S.T.; Mansour, A.A.; Schlachetzki, J.C.M.; Pena, M.; Ghassemzadeh, S.; Mitchell, L.; Mar, A.; Quang, D.; Stumpf, S.; Ortiz, I.S.; et al. An in vivo neuroimmune organoid model to study human microglia phenotypes. Cell 2023, 186, 2111–2126.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Leung, C.M.; de Haan, P.; Ronaldson-Bouchard, K.; Kim, G.-A.; Ko, J.; Rho, H.S.; Chen, Z.; Habibovic, P.; Jeon, N.L.; Takayama, S.; et al. A guide to the organ-on-a-chip. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2022, 2, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Park, S.E.; Georgescu, A.; Huh, D. Organoids-on-a-chip. Science 2019, 364, 960–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, T.; Yang, S.; Ge, Y.; Yin, L.; Pu, Y.; Gu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Liang, G. Unveiling the Heart’s Hidden Enemy: Dynamic Insights into Polystyrene Nanoplastic-Induced Cardiotoxicity Based on Cardiac Organoid-on-a-Chip. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 31569–31585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Y.; Qin, J. Human brain organoid-on-a-chip to model prenatal nicotine exposure. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Skardal, A.; Aleman, J.; Forsythe, S.; Rajan, S.; Murphy, S.; Devarasetty, M.; Pourhabibi Zarandi, N.; Nzou, G.; Wicks, R.; Sadri-Ardekani, H.; et al. Drug compound screening in single and integrated multi-organoid body-on-a-chip systems. Biofabrication 2020, 12, 025017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hu, C.; Yang, S.; Zhang, T.; Ge, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Pu, Y.; Liang, G. Organoids and organoids-on-a-chip as the new testing strategies for environmental toxicology-applications & advantages. Environ. Int. 2024, 184, 108415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhao, Y.; Landau, S.; Okhovatian, S.; Liu, C.; Lu, R.X.Z.; Lai, B.F.L.; Wu, Q.; Kieda, J.; Cheung, K.; Rajasekar, S.; et al. Integrating organoids and organ-on-a-chip devices. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2024, 2, 588–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lu, R.X.Z.; Radisic, M. Organ-on-a-chip platforms for evaluation of environmental nanoparticle toxicity. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 2801–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hu, W.; Lazar, M.A. Modelling metabolic diseases and drug response using stem cells and organoids. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022, 18, 744–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Li, M.; Wu, K.; Wei, S.; Zhao, Y.; Shen, J.; Du, F.; Chen, Y.; Deng, S.; et al. Organoid, organ-on-a-chip and traditional Chinese medicine. Chin. Med. 2025, 20, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PFAS exposure routes and organoid models for toxicity assessment. (A) Drinking water and occupational exposure are the main routes of PFAS exposure. PFAS can be transmitted from mother to fetus through the placenta. (BD) Human organoid models can be applied to evaluate the toxicity of PFAS.
Figure 1. PFAS exposure routes and organoid models for toxicity assessment. (A) Drinking water and occupational exposure are the main routes of PFAS exposure. PFAS can be transmitted from mother to fetus through the placenta. (BD) Human organoid models can be applied to evaluate the toxicity of PFAS.
Bioengineering 12 00393 g001
Figure 2. Advances and challenges in human organoid models. (A) Observing human organoids by microscopy is a simple and convenient method for quantitative analysis. (B) Immunofluorescence staining revealed biochemical changes in organoids after exposure to toxicants. (C) Multi-omics sequencing can further explore toxic mechanisms. (D) Microfluidic chips can reduce the heterogeneity of organoid culture and further improve the existing organoid culture methods.
Figure 2. Advances and challenges in human organoid models. (A) Observing human organoids by microscopy is a simple and convenient method for quantitative analysis. (B) Immunofluorescence staining revealed biochemical changes in organoids after exposure to toxicants. (C) Multi-omics sequencing can further explore toxic mechanisms. (D) Microfluidic chips can reduce the heterogeneity of organoid culture and further improve the existing organoid culture methods.
Bioengineering 12 00393 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, H.; Kang, J.; Gao, X.; Lan, Y.; Li, M. Towards a Better Understanding of the Human Health Risk of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Using Organoid Models. Bioengineering 2025, 12, 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12040393

AMA Style

Xu H, Kang J, Gao X, Lan Y, Li M. Towards a Better Understanding of the Human Health Risk of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Using Organoid Models. Bioengineering. 2025; 12(4):393. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12040393

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Haoan, Jiahui Kang, Xue Gao, Yingying Lan, and Minghui Li. 2025. "Towards a Better Understanding of the Human Health Risk of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Using Organoid Models" Bioengineering 12, no. 4: 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12040393

APA Style

Xu, H., Kang, J., Gao, X., Lan, Y., & Li, M. (2025). Towards a Better Understanding of the Human Health Risk of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Using Organoid Models. Bioengineering, 12(4), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12040393

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop