The Dynamics and Resilience of Innovation Networks in a Disruptive World

A special issue of Systems (ISSN 2079-8954). This special issue belongs to the section "Complex Systems and Cybernetics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2026 | Viewed by 1519

Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
The Goodman School of Business, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
Interests: innovation networks; gender diversity in innovation; gender and technology; artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs); knowledge graphs; responsible and sustainable innovation; research funding and policy impact; network analysis and social network analysis (SNA)

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Innovation networks are the foundation of technological progress, competitiveness, and resilience in an increasingly interconnected and uncertain world. Yet, the last decade has shown that global disruptions (ranging from pandemics and geopolitical instability to supply chain shocks and rapid digital transformation) can profoundly alter the structure and dynamics of these networks. Understanding how innovation systems adapt, reorganize, and sustain collaboration amid disruption has become central to both research and policy.

This Special Issue of Systems focuses on the dynamics and resilience of innovation networks in the face of disruption. We invite studies that apply systems thinking, social network analysis, and dynamic modeling to examine how knowledge flows, partnerships, and innovation capabilities evolve under changing conditions. Contributions may include theoretical frameworks, empirical analyses, computational models, or case studies that explore adaptation mechanisms, co-evolutionary processes, and resilience strategies within innovation ecosystems.

We particularly encourage submissions that integrate technological, organizational, and policy perspectives to uncover how systemic interdependencies shape network resilience. Research that leverages data analytics, machine learning, or simulation to capture network evolution and recovery patterns is also welcome. By connecting systems theory with innovation studies, this Special Issue aims to build a comprehensive understanding of how innovation networks can endure and thrive in a disruptive world.

This Special Issue particularly welcomes submissions addressing, among others:

  • Dynamic modeling of innovation networks and adaptive collaboration structures;
  • Resilience mechanisms in inter-firm and inter-institutional relationships;
  • Network-based analysis of technological change and knowledge diffusion;
  • The role of digital transformation, AI, and data-driven ecosystems in shaping innovation systems;
  • Governance, policy, and institutional factors influencing network adaptability;
  • Empirical and computational approaches to measuring disruption and recovery in innovation systems;
  • Comparative studies of regional and global innovation ecosystems.

This Special Issue aligns with the scope of Systems by embracing systems thinking and complex systems methodologies to explore interdependencies, emergent patterns, and adaptive capacities in innovation networks. The goal is to foster theoretical, empirical, and practical insights that advance both the science and management of innovation systems.

Dr. Leila Tahmooresnejad
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Systems is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • innovation networks
  • network resilience
  • disruption
  • systems thinking
  • digital transformation
  • complex adaptive systems
  • social network analysis
  • dynamic modeling
  • technological change
  • policy and governance

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

27 pages, 2428 KB  
Article
Matching Innovation System Models to Context: An Explanatory Potential Framework
by Homero Malagón, Alfonso Ávila Robinson and Aida Huerta Barrientos
Systems 2026, 14(5), 502; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14050502 - 1 May 2026
Viewed by 291
Abstract
Innovation system decision-making is a core component in promoting incentives and conditions necessary for the emergence of innovation. It also plays a critical role in guiding policy and modeling strategies that aim to promote science, technology, and entrepreneurship at national, regional, and local [...] Read more.
Innovation system decision-making is a core component in promoting incentives and conditions necessary for the emergence of innovation. It also plays a critical role in guiding policy and modeling strategies that aim to promote science, technology, and entrepreneurship at national, regional, and local levels. Decision-makers often select innovation system models that do not align with contextual scope, data accessibility, or institutional conditions, undermining their implementation. The lack of alignment between innovation system model assumptions and contextual realities undermines analysis and policy design, particularly when trying to implement a regional model on a national scale without any sort of adaptation. This study presents a framework that aligns innovation system models to specific contexts by providing a decision-making system based on structural analysis. Using a comprehensive collection of relevant previous studies related to the theoretical evolution of innovation system models, this research provides insights regarding the most used types and techniques to compare innovation systems comprising national and regional ISs, helix models, and innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystems. For each model, explanatory potential via structural analysis is operationalized through five indicators derived from multilevel graphs: geopolitical scope, number of actors, vertical and horizontal density, and Shannon’s entropy. These indicators are then systematized into dimensions comprising two feasibility filters and three mechanism-related dimensions, forming the basis for a minimum viable innovation system model selection heuristic. This structural analysis shows that ecosystem lenses capture distributive and adaptive interaction structures; helix models emphasize coordination and governance; and national or regional innovation systems underscore policy reach and institutional boundaries. The results provide a numerical analysis of three different contexts—a national mission, a city entrepreneurship program, and a regional coordination upgrading effort—highlighting areas for improvement in planning, project implementation, and public policy design. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2780 KB  
Article
Pattern Recognition of Innovation Partnerships in China’s Integrated Circuit Industry: Application of Network Motif Analytics
by Xinyang Guo, Longfei Li, Zongshui Wang and Hong Zhao
Systems 2026, 14(4), 433; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14040433 - 16 Apr 2026
Viewed by 613
Abstract
Exploring information embedded in local network structure is essential for understanding the overall network structure and its functions. The development of innovation clusters in China’s Integrated Circuit (IC) industry has emerged as a key driver of industrial innovation. Different innovation clusters exhibit different [...] Read more.
Exploring information embedded in local network structure is essential for understanding the overall network structure and its functions. The development of innovation clusters in China’s Integrated Circuit (IC) industry has emerged as a key driver of industrial innovation. Different innovation clusters exhibit different collaboration patterns. Therefore, this study takes China’s Integrated Circuit Industry from 2011 to 2020 as the research object. It applies the motif-based method to analyze the three-node subgraphs and four-node subgraphs in the innovation network. The analysis focuses on collaboration patterns and the evolution of collaboration patterns, the distribution of collaboration patterns, as well as network motifs and network metrics. The results lead to the following conclusions. First, subgraphs featuring closed structures, particularly those with triadic closure, are identified as motifs and exhibit greater structural stability. In contrast, subgraphs lacking such closed configurations are classified as anti-motifs. However, transitions between anti-motifs and motifs are observed. Second, even systems of the same type may exhibit different subgraph ratio profiles and therefore belong to different motif families. At the same time, one motif superfamily may correspond to one or multiple motif concentration distributions. Third, network motifs in the innovation network are correlated with basic network characteristics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop