Current Trends in Foot & Ankle Surgery

A special issue of Osteology (ISSN 2673-4036).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 March 2022) | Viewed by 22977

Special Issue Editor

Tahoe Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, University of Nevada Reno, South Lake Tahoe, Reno, NV 96150, USA
Interests: foot and ankle surgery; sports medicine; musculoskeletal trauma; cartilage restoraton
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Foot and ankle surgery is a relatively new speciality. The first gathering of surgones with an interest in this began in 1969. Since then, advances in foot and ankle surgery have outpaced advances in other specialties as the available space to grow is larger. Osteology would like to take this opportunity to invite young surgeons and researchers to share their knowledge, research, questions, and techniques relative to foot and ankle surgery, in order to help all of us move forward in advancing patient care.

Dr. Paul Ryan
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Osteology is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • foot and ankle
  • achilles
  • osteochondral lesions
  • osteochondral defects
  • ankle instablity
  • calcaneal fractures
  • talar fractures
  • ankle fractures
  • syndesmotic injuries
  • deltoid injuries
  • sports injuries
  • runnng injuries
  • progressive collapsing flatfoot deformity
  • ankle arthritis
  • ankle replacement
  • ankle arthroscopy
  • foot trauma
  • lisfranc injury

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

6 pages, 6711 KiB  
Article
Talus Fractures in Snowboarders: A Case Series
by Nancy M. Luger, Cecilia Pascual-Garrido, Andrew Haus, Britta L. Swanson and Kyle E. Swanson
Osteology 2022, 2(2), 106-111; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology2020012 - 26 May 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3837
Abstract
Fractures of the lateral process of the talus have been associated with snowboarding, so much so that they have earned the nickname “snowboarder’s ankle”; these typically occur with relatively low-energy injuries when compared with fractures of the talar head, neck, and body. We [...] Read more.
Fractures of the lateral process of the talus have been associated with snowboarding, so much so that they have earned the nickname “snowboarder’s ankle”; these typically occur with relatively low-energy injuries when compared with fractures of the talar head, neck, and body. We have observed that snowboarding portends a higher risk of talus fractures when compared with skiing and can include higher energy injury patterns. This study describes a series of talar head, neck, and body fractures caused by snowboarding, their treatment, and outcomes. A retrospective chart review was performed on all surgical cases collected from 2007 to 2012 to include talar head, neck, body, or lateral process fractures sustained while snowboarding. Radiographs were reviewed and the fractures were characterized. Questionnaires, including the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), were mailed to the patients. The pre-operative reports, surgical treatments, and outcomes were evaluated. Nine patients were identified with fractures of the talus caused by a snowboarding injury. One patient sustained an isolated talar head fracture, three sustained isolated talar neck fractures, one patient had an isolated talar body fracture, and two patients had isolated lateral process fractures. Two patients had a combination of talar injuries. At 2.5 years mean follow-up (range 6 months to 5 years), none of the patients developed avascular necrosis, nonunion/malunion, or required subsequent surgery. FADI scores indicated good to excellent results post-operatively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Foot & Ankle Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 1528 KiB  
Article
Tarsometatarsal Joint Preparation Using a Modified Dorsal Approach vs. the Standard Approach: A Cadaver Study
by Sudarsan Murali, Zachary Littlefield, Sean Young, Nicholas A. Andrews, Eli Levitt, Abhinav Agarwal and Ashish Shah
Osteology 2022, 2(2), 99-105; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology2020011 - 19 May 2022
Viewed by 5080
Abstract
The standard surgical approach for the fusion of the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint involves a two-incision approach. Philpott et al. proposed a modified, single-incision dorsal approach that yields a similar exposure. This study compares the joint preparation between the standard and modified dorsal approach. [...] Read more.
The standard surgical approach for the fusion of the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint involves a two-incision approach. Philpott et al. proposed a modified, single-incision dorsal approach that yields a similar exposure. This study compares the joint preparation between the standard and modified dorsal approach. Ten fresh frozen cadaver specimens were randomly assigned to receive either a standard or modified dorsal operative approach to the TMT joint. The joint surface was prepared, and the joint was disarticulated. Image analysis, using ImageJ, was performed by two blinded reviewers to assess the joint surface preparation and this was compared by surgical approach. There was no significant difference in the amount of joint prepared when comparing the standard versus modified dorsal approach for TMT joints one through three (p = 0.548, p = 0.310, p = 0.548). First, TMT was 67.6% prepared by the standard approach vs 71.7% by the modified dorsal approach, second TMT was 67.9% vs. 65.7%, and third TMT was 65.9% vs. 59.6%. With our findings, we demonstrate that a modified dorsal approach with a single incision did not limit the ability to prepare the joint space. This study adds credibility backed by data to those set forth by Philipott et al. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Foot & Ankle Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1191 KiB  
Article
Impact of Resilience on Patient Reported Outcome of First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis
by Nicholas Andrews, Sterling Tran, Sean Young, Jared Halstrom, Jessyca Ray, Zach Littlefield, Gerald McGwin, Abhinav Agarwal and Ashish Shah
Osteology 2022, 2(2), 87-98; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology2020010 - 19 May 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2279
Abstract
Resilience is a dynamic construct defined as the ability to recover from stress. There is no literature examining the impact of resilience on outcomes following foot and ankle surgery. Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent first MTP arthrodesis from September 2011 to May [...] Read more.
Resilience is a dynamic construct defined as the ability to recover from stress. There is no literature examining the impact of resilience on outcomes following foot and ankle surgery. Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent first MTP arthrodesis from September 2011 to May 2020 were reviewed for patient characteristics and union status. PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Depression (D), and Foot Function Index (FFI) were collected. Resilience was measured using the Brief Resilience Scale. A multivariable linear regression analysis examining the impact of resilience on patient reported was conducted. At an average of 3.4 years postoperatively, resilience was found to independently affect patient reported outcomes across all instruments, except the FFI pain subscale. In the first study examining the impact of resilience following foot and ankle surgery, we found that resilience has an independent positive effect on overall physical function, disability, pain, and mental health following MTP arthrodesis. Preoperative resilience scores could be used to predict postoperative functional outcomes following MTP arthrodesis and guide postoperative rehabilitation. These findings help establish the role of early positive psychosocial characteristics within orthopaedic foot and ankle population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Foot & Ankle Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 7599 KiB  
Article
Traumatic Lesser Metatarsal Fractures: A Case Series and Review of the Literature
by Connor L. Zale, Melanie Cusi and Paul M. Ryan
Osteology 2022, 2(2), 77-86; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology2020009 - 16 May 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4448
Abstract
Background: metatarsal fractures are a commonly encountered musculoskeletal injury. Scant literature exists to support current treatment guidelines and few studies describe the functional or occupational outcomes of patients with lesser metatarsal fractures. The purpose of this study is to describe occupational outcomes for [...] Read more.
Background: metatarsal fractures are a commonly encountered musculoskeletal injury. Scant literature exists to support current treatment guidelines and few studies describe the functional or occupational outcomes of patients with lesser metatarsal fractures. The purpose of this study is to describe occupational outcomes for traumatic lesser metatarsal fractures in relation to current treatment guidelines. Methods: a retrospective review of metatarsal fractures in adult military patients 18 years and older was performed. Data included: patient demographics, fracture angulation and displacement, treatment modality, associated injuries, rate of return to active duty, requirement for additional surgeries, ability to run a 2-mile physical fitness test, and presence of permanent activity limitations. Treatment guideline criteria were applied and compared with the occupational outcomes measured. Results: 38 fractures were included. The mean age was 27.2 ± 7.8 (19–48). Here, 28 fractures were initially treated non-operatively. Fractures selected for non-operative treatment had a mean displacement of 1.7 +/− 1.1 mm and a mean angulation of 3.3 +/− 3.5° at initial presentation. Fractures selected for operative treatment had a mean displacement of 4.5 +/− 2.4 mm and a mean angulation of 15.7 +/− 13.8° at initial presentation. The return to run rate was 89% in non-operatively treated patients and 50% in operatively treated patients (p = 0.02). Non-operative patients returned to running at a mean of 119 +/− 103 days and operative patients returned to running at a mean of 306 +/− 191 days (p = 0.0039). 50% of operatively treated patients and 11% of non-operatively treated patents were unable to remain in the military due to their metatarsal fractures. Conclusions: patients treated non-operatively were more likely to return to running and returned to running sooner than operatively treated patients. Current treatment guidelines could not be supported or refuted based upon the study results. The occupational and functional outcomes demonstrated in this study may assist surgeons in counseling patients on their planned treatment and anticipated recovery following a lesser metatarsal fracture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Foot & Ankle Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

8 pages, 651 KiB  
Systematic Review
Return to Driving after Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review
by Alexander Lundy, Andres Piscoya, Daniel Rodkey, Michael Bedrin and Tobin Eckel
Osteology 2022, 2(3), 121-128; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology2030014 - 4 Jul 2022
Viewed by 2222
Abstract
(1) Background: This systematic review summarizes the available studies investigating when it is safe for most patients to return to driving and when to modify for individual patients following elective foot and ankle procedures. (2) Methods: A systematic review of the literature was [...] Read more.
(1) Background: This systematic review summarizes the available studies investigating when it is safe for most patients to return to driving and when to modify for individual patients following elective foot and ankle procedures. (2) Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using three different electronic databases to identify English-language studies from 1999 to present that investigate the return to driving after right-sided elective foot and ankle procedures. (3) Results: A total of eight studies met inclusion criteria. All the studies investigated brake reaction time (BRT) as measured by a driving simulator as their primary outcome. Patients undergoing right ankle or subtalar arthroscopy should wait 2 weeks to drive, after total ankle arthroplasty or corrective hallux valgus surgery patients should wait 6 weeks, and the appropriate time to return to driving after ankle arthrodesis is still uncertain. Additionally, various clinical factors can be used to predict who may still be unfit to drive past the usual length of time. (4) Conclusions: The recommendations from these reviewed studies can guide physicians when counseling their patients on when they can expect to safely return to driving after a specific elective foot and ankle procedure. However, these recommendations should be tailored to the patient specifically based upon how they are doing clinically. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Foot & Ankle Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 2990 KiB  
Case Report
Bilateral Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
by Christian A. Cruz, Jeffrey L. Wake, Ryan J. Bickley, Logan Morin, Brian J. Mannino, Kevin P. Krul and Paul Ryan
Osteology 2022, 2(2), 70-76; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology2020008 - 26 Apr 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3773
Abstract
While Achilles tendon injuries are common amongst the general population, there are very few cases in which simultaneous bilateral injuries occur. Medial malleolar fractures at the time of Achilles tendon rupture have been cited in the literature and are commonly missed. The following [...] Read more.
While Achilles tendon injuries are common amongst the general population, there are very few cases in which simultaneous bilateral injuries occur. Medial malleolar fractures at the time of Achilles tendon rupture have been cited in the literature and are commonly missed. The following case outlines the presentation, treatment, and outcome of a United States Army Soldier with simultaneous bilateral Achilles tendon ruptures in addition to a unilateral right medial malleolar fracture. This patient was able to completely return to duty within 1 year after being treated with ORIF of the medial malleolus, bilateral end-to-end repair of the AT, and accelerated rehabilitation beginning at 2 weeks on the left and 6 weeks on the right. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Foot & Ankle Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop