Announcements

Recently, we reached out to Dr. Simone Bello, winner of the Geosciences 2023 Outstanding Reviewer Award, as we were eager to hear his perspectives on geosciences.

Name: Dr. Simone Bello
Affiliation: 1. DiSPuTer, University G. d’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy;
2. CRUST–interUniversity Center for 3D Seismotectonics with Territorial Applications, Italy
Research Interests: structural geology, seismotectonics, active tectonics, field geology

The following is an interview with Dr. Simone Bello:

2. What’s your current research area and why did you choose this field?

I am currently engaged in multiple research endeavors that collectively contribute to advancing our understanding of the structural–geological complexities of the entire Italian Apennines and beyond. One prominent aspect of my work involves the construction of a comprehensive database housing structural–geological information. This expansive database is pivotal in achieving various scientific objectives, notably the nuanced redefinition of tectonic provinces within the Italian peninsula and the detailed exploration of the stress and deformation dynamics shaping the region.

In a parallel research strand, I am delving into the synergistic integration of structural and topographic data with geochemical insights. This interdisciplinary approach aims to unravel the mysteries surrounding past earthquakes and their "imprints" on the topographic surface. By merging and analyzing these diverse datasets, I seek to unveil the relationships between geological structures, topography, and geochemical signatures, providing valuable insights into the seismic history of the studied area.

This dual-pronged research approach not only contributes significantly to the broader field of geosciences but also holds practical implications for seismic hazard assessment and mitigation. As we refine our understanding of the geological complexities and historical seismic activity of our places, we move closer to developing more effective strategies for seismic risk management and enhancing the resilience of communities in earthquake-prone regions.

3. What qualities do you think young scientists need?

First and foremost, I believe that passion forms the bedrock of a young scientist's qualities. While it may sound cliché, the genuine love for what one does is fundamental. Personally, my passion for my work serves as a driving force, enabling me to navigate even the most challenging days with enthusiasm and to tackle every obstacle in the best possible way. Therefore, the first crucial quality is to be passionate.

The second essential quality is undoubtedly determination. In the field of research, determination is paramount; it empowers individuals to achieve remarkable outcomes even in the face of numerous setbacks. Embracing determination allows one to persevere through failures and ultimately reach successful conclusions. Be determined!

Lastly, I would emphasize the significance of being dynamic and proactive. Delve into new fields of study and approach everything with the eagerness to learn something new. Forge collaborations that expand your scientific horizons continually. Being dynamic and proactive fosters a mindset of constant growth and adaptability in the ever-evolving scientific landscape.

4. What qualities do you think reviewers need?

Being a good reviewer plays a crucial role in evaluating and improving scientific papers, and several qualities are essential. Firstly, a reviewer should be driven by curiosity, motivated to explore the latest scientific discoveries even before they are officially published.

A good reviewer must possess impartiality and a proactive mindset. While reviewing well-structured, well-written, clear, concise, and comprehensive scientific articles can be rewarding, it is equally important to provide constructive feedback when some of these qualities are lacking. Guiding authors with valuable suggestions to enhance their research is a key aspect of the reviewer's role.

Intellectual honesty is a cornerstone. A reviewer should maintain fairness, even when there might be disagreements with specific content due to personal background or cultural influences. This is contingent upon the condition that the research adheres to sound scientific methods. Embracing diverse perspectives and encouraging new ideas is vital for advancing scientific knowledge.

Finally, the efficiency of reviewing a paper quickly is among the best qualities! After all, who doesn't know the anxiety of waiting for their article, on which they've worked so hard, to come back from reviews?

5. As the winner of this award, is there something you want to express, or someone to thank most?

First of all, I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to the Award Committee for bestowing upon me the Geosciences 2023 Outstanding Reviewer Award. Upon learning of my win, I was truly incredulous and pleasantly surprised, as I had not anticipated such recognition for my role as a reviewer for Geosciences. There's a common belief among researchers that dedicating time to the peer review process takes away from one's own research endeavors without providing much in return. Personally, I've always disagreed with such statements, as the act of reviewing not only makes contributions to the scientific community, but also provides invaluable learning experiences. Winning this award further strengthens my conviction that the reviewing process is a crucial and enriching aspect of our academic pursuits.

I also want to extend my gratitude to my exceptional research team at the University of Chieti. They have become a second family to me, and I share a significant portion of my time and passion for research with them. Their support and collaboration have been instrumental in my achievements.