J. Aesthetic Med., Volume 1, Issue 1 (September 2025) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1400 KiB  
Article
Fractional CO2 Laser for Acne Scar Treatment: A Comparative Analysis of Ablative vs. Combined Ablative and Non-Ablative Modalities
by Arminda Avdulaj, Shaked Menashe, Yoad Govrin-Yehudain, Eran Hadad, Sharon Moscovici, Omer Dor and Lior Heller
J. Aesthetic Med. 2025, 1(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/jaestheticmed1010002 - 2 Jun 2025
Viewed by 968
Abstract
As acne scars remain challenging to treat, this study compared the safety and efficacy of two laser modalities for acne scar treatment. Between 2022 and 2024, 88 patients were treated for acne scars using either the Hybrid platform with the ProScan applicator, which [...] Read more.
As acne scars remain challenging to treat, this study compared the safety and efficacy of two laser modalities for acne scar treatment. Between 2022 and 2024, 88 patients were treated for acne scars using either the Hybrid platform with the ProScan applicator, which delivers fractional ablative carbon dioxide (CO2) 10,600 nm and non-ablative 1570 nm wavelengths in a dual mode, or the Pixel CO2 laser with the LiteScan applicator, which delivers a fractional ablative CO2 10,600 nm wavelength alone. Clinical efficacy was assessed using the Echelle d’Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices D’Acne (ECCA) scale. Both groups showed significant improvements in ECCA scores post-treatment (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). However, the percentage change in scores from baseline to post-treatment did not differ significantly between the groups (p > 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Adverse effects were mild and transient, resolving within a few days, with no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05, chi-squared test). Both laser modalities demonstrated high efficacy and safety in treating acne scars, with significant post-treatment improvement in scar severity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

2 pages, 163 KiB  
Editorial
Present and Future Trends of Aesthetic Medicine
by Steven Nisticò
J. Aesthetic Med. 2025, 1(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/jaestheticmed1010001 - 30 Apr 2025
Viewed by 491
Abstract
The Journal of Aesthetic Medicine is an open access MDPI publication which serves as an international platform for publishing innovative research and advanced clinical practice in aesthetic medicine [...] Full article
Back to TopTop