Next Article in Journal
Statement of Peer Review
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Photocatalytic Performance of g-C3N4/ZnO Nanocomposites for the Efficient Degradation of Dyes Under Sunlight
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Assessment of the Lower Danube Sediment Regime and Morphology for the Identification of Habitats for Critically Endangered Sturgeon †

1
National Institute for Research and Development in Environmental Protection, Splaiul Independentei no 294, District 6, 060031 Bucharest, Romania
2
Faculty of Biotechnical Systems Engineering, The National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest—Splaiul Independenței 313, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 6th International Conference on Green Environmental Engineering and Technology (IConGEET2024), Bali, Indonesia, 29–30 August.
Environ. Earth Sci. Proc. 2025, 33(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025033009
Published: 12 May 2025

Abstract

:
The investigation of sediment morphology and sediment regime is crucial for the initial stages of the hydromorphodynamic modeling of the Lower Danube basin. This helps in identifying significant habitats and potential obstacles that may disrupt the migration patterns of anadromous sturgeon species in the Lower Danube. This investigation involved the analysis of 10 samples, which were collected in equal quantities from specific places where hydrotechnical activities were conducted, specifically the Bala and Caleia branches. The sediment samples were analyzed to determine their morphological and structural characteristics through granulometric assessments. Additionally, three significant parameters, namely, the standard deviation, symmetry index (skewness index), and flattening index (kurtosis index), were used for further characterization.

1. Introduction

The morphology of the substrate is a vital aspect in comprehending the specific needs of anadromous sturgeon species for their wintering, feeding, and particularly spawning habitats [1,2]. Considering that the three species can only reproduce in the Lower Danube [3], it is crucial to analyze the morphology and sediment regime. These data are necessary for further complex hydromorphodynamic modeling, which can give a greater awareness of the potential risks of migration route disruption [4].
Over time, a number of hydrotechnical works were undertaken to maintain navigation along the Danube and assure the uninterrupted flow of economic activities. Between 2011 and 2014, a project was constructed near the county of Braila, specifically, on a subsidiary branch of the Danube known as the Caleia branch, with the primary objective being to reallocate the flow of water from the secondary channel to the main branch through the installation of a bottom sill. The bottom sill and consequent redistribution of water flow resulted in hydrodynamic changes due to the higher velocity of the water current [5,6]. These alterations can have an impact on the migration of anadromous sturgeon species that move upstream from the Black Sea to reproduce [7,8,9].
On the other hand, sediments play an important role in defining the degree of water pollution and can provide a better understanding of how different pollutants are dispersed in the Danube basin [10,11]. The quality of the input data utilized is a crucial aspect in maintaining a high level of confidence in the output of numerical modeling methods. To guarantee this, the National Institute for Research and Development in Environmental Protection (INCDPM) conducts in situ measurements for the parameters required by hydromorphodynamic models. These measurements include both input data and the parameters necessary for numerical simulations, calibration, and validation processes. As granulometric analysis methods we mention the following [12]:
  • Sieving using sieves (grain diameter d > 2.00 mm);
  • In situ sieving method (0.05–0.08 (0.063) < d< 2.00 mm);
  • Sedimentation method (d < 0.05–0.08 (0.063) mm).
The granulometric analysis provides correlations between the mass percentage of solid particles below a given dimension and the corresponding particle diameter, represented through specific graphs, such as the following:
  • The frequency curve, which is a graphical depiction of a string that consists of pairs of particle size classes and their corresponding fractions—a histogram representing the simple frequency distribution in percentage [%] and the proportion of involvement for each distinct size class.
  • The cumulative frequency refers to the total accumulation of frequencies in a dataset. The cumulative percentage involvement refers to the total proportion of each particle size class up to a specific diameter value.
Furthermore, the granulometric curves were characterized by the following parameters: the median, the graphical mean, the standard deviation, the skewness index, and the kurtosis index. In this study, the structure and composition of sediment, along with the patterns of sediment movement, that are crucial factors in developing numerical models that are key habitats for anadromous sturgeon species in the Lower Danube, were analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Campaigns

In order to conduct sediment transport modeling, it is essential to determine the sedimentological properties of the river bed within the modeling area. In order to achieve this objective, INCDPM conducted in situ sampling campaigns, specifically targeting submerged obstacles on the Bala and Caleia branch areas (Figure 1), due to their potential impact on anadromous sturgeon migration upstream from the Black Sea. During these campaigns, a total of 10 sediment samples were collected, 5 for each branch, at different depths.
In order to establish the sediment databases, samples were assigned unique identification parameters in the format PS_location_sample_number: PS_Bala_1–PS_Bala_5 and PS_Caleia_1–Ps_Caleia_5, respectively.

2.2. Granulometric Assessment

The preliminary evaluation of silt involves performing a particle size analysis, which is a technical procedure that separates and categorizes the particles in a sediment sample based on their size, indicated as a percentage distribution. This process establishes the geometric properties of the particles, which are categorized into granulometric fractions that represent clusters of solid fragments. These fractions are measured as units of mass or as a percentage of the total mass of the dry sample. The particles are defined by their dimensions, which fall within specific size ranges defined by upper and lower limits.
The INCDPM campaigns obtained representative samples from various depths in the examined areas. The granulometric analysis of these samples was conducted using the sieving methodology. The STAS 1913/5-85 standard was considered in order to ascertain the grain size. Each sample was weighed at 300 g. The laboratory sample was then dried at a temperature of 105 °C, until it reached a consistent mass (the difference between two consecutive weighing was no more than 0.0002 g). The moisture content of the samples was then calculated.
The sample to be processed was poured over the sieve with the largest mesh of the set used, the action being carried out manually (Figure 2a) or by using a machine (Figure 2b), until the granular fractions separated.
In order to verify the completion of the sieving process, each sieve is vigorously shaken over a sheet of paper for a duration of 1 min. The material that has successfully gone through the shaking sieve should not exceed 1% of the total mass of the material on that sieve. The residue left on the paper is then combined with the material on the subsequent sieve. The weight of the granular fractions that remain on each sieve is measured.
The most widely used grain size scale in sedimentology is the Udden–Wentworth granular scale [13], with particle diameters expressed in millimetres and unchanged ratios between class boundaries. The PHI scale was introduced by Krumbein [14] and represents the logarithmic transformation of the Udden–Wentworth geometric scale, the phi diameter being calculated as the binary logarithm (log base 2) of the particle diameter (D) in mm.
ϕphi = log2 D
This enables the analysis of sediment size distributions throughout a broader range of diameter values and facilitates a more concentrated examination of smaller particles.
Additionally, the granulometric curves were characterized by the following parameters:
  • The median, also known as D50, is the diameter value that splits the particle size distribution into two equal sections, with 50% of the particles having a diameter smaller than or equal to this value. Additional significant values are the size values corresponding to the selected cumulative frequencies equidistant from D50: D16 and D84, D5 and D95, and D25 and D75.
  • The graphical mean of a distribution refers to the arithmetic mean of frequencies that are equidistant from the 50th percentile.
M F o l k W a r d = D 16 + D 50 + D 84 3
  • Standard deviation corresponds to the dispersion of size values within the distribution around the mean of 50%.
σ F o l k W a r d = D 84 D 16 4 + D 95 D 5 6.6
  • The skewness index, also known as the mean squared deviation, quantifies the extent to which values are dispersed in a frequency distribution.
S K = D 16 + D 84 2 × D 50 2 × D 84 D 16 + D 5 + D 95 2 × D 50 2 × D 95 D 5
  • The kurtosis index quantifies the degree to which values in a frequency distribution are concentrated in a certain region.
K G = D 95 D 5 2.44 × D 75 D 25

3. Results and Discussion

The percentage distribution of the granular fractions for the five samples collected from the bottom sills area of the Bala branch are presented in Table 1. The same results for the Caleia branch can be found in Table 2.
Figure 3 present the histograms, corresponding to simple frequency curves for the Bala branch samples. Figure 4 shows the cumulative frequency curves for the data collected from the Bala branch area.
Regarding the samples taken from the submerged obstacle area in the Caleia branch, the histograms (simple frequency curves) are shown in Figure 5 and the cumulative frequency curves are shown in Figure 6.
Using the characteristic values for particle diameter obtained from the examination of sediment samples, we calculated the indicators to characterize the 10 sediment samples. The results can be found in Table 3 and Table 4. The diagnostic analysis was conducted on the gathered sediment samples to determine the classes of values for the cumulative curve parameters. The results of this study are depicted using the color coding presented in Figure 7.

4. Conclusions

The structure and composition of sediment, as well as the patterns of sediment movement, are essential factors in the development of numerical models that study the important habitats for the anadromous sturgeon species in the Lower Danube, and also help identify areas where migration routes may be at risk of disruption, especially due to hydrotechnical works, such as the ones on the Bala and Caleia branches.
In this context, upon analyzing the cumulative curve representation of the samples collected from the Bala branch area, it was determined that the primary grain size fraction is the fine–medium sand class. Furthermore, following the assessment of the cumulative curves of the samples taken from the Caleia branch area, it was found that the primary grain size fraction is the fine–medium sand class. It was observed that the range of values is wider compared to the samples from the Bala branch area, where the coarse sand fraction is more prominent.
It was demonstrated that, with respect to the standard deviation, 9 out of 10 samples exhibit “Excellent sorting”, while PS_Caleia_5 is characterized by “Good sorting”. When it comes to the symmetry index (skewness), 9 out of 10 samples show a “Positive asymmetry”, while PS_Bala_1 exhibits a “Strongly positive asymmetry”.
The parameter that differentiates the samples the most is the flattening index (kurtosis). Even though all the samples from the Caleia branch are characterized as “Strong flattening”, when it comes to the Bala branch, two out of the five samples exhibit a sharp character, while the remaining three samples show a flattening character.
These data regarding the morphology and regime of sediments in two areas of interest for the anadromous sturgeon migration in the Lower Danube will be employed in further studies regarding the numerical modeling of the river basin in order to better understand its morphology and to identify important habitats and potential disruptions in migration routes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.T. and E.H.; methodology, G.T.; software, G.T. and M.A.; validation, E.H., G.T. and I.S.; formal analysis, I.S. and S.S.; investigation, M.A. and M.C.; resources, G.T., G.C. and S.S.; data curation, M.A. and I.S.; writing—original draft preparation, G.C., S.S. and M.C.; writing—review and editing, I.S. and M.A.; visualization, M.C. and M.A.; supervision, G.T.; project administration, E.H.; funding acquisition, E.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization of Romania, contract no. 44N/2023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study were collected during the in situ campaigns in 2023.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out through the Core Program BIO-CliMission of the National Plan for Research, Development and Innovation 2022–2027, with the support of MCID, project no. PN 23 31 02 01.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. INCDPM PN 23 31 02 01. Assessment of Anthropogenic Impacts on Migration Routes/Breeding Habitats for the Development of Complementary Conservation Measures and Extension of Strict Protection Areas for the Sturgeon Population Monitored on the Danube River in Accordance with the EU Mission and Biodiversity Strategy 2030—SturHabCons (2023–2026). Available online: https://www.incdpm.org/reports (accessed on 18 March 2025).
  2. INCDPM-Project Evolution of sturgeon populations and Danube ichthyofauna in the context of changes in the course of the Danube in recent decades (Contract no. 39N/2019), phase 19 43 02 01.4.2.2 Identification of Sturgeon Behavior Under Different Hydromorphodynamic Conditions Resulting from the Implementation of Hydrotechnical Works (2021). Available online: https://www.incdpm.org/_files/ugd/698962_b592a834336f45158ff25a59b77f660f.pdf (accessed on 18 March 2025).
  3. Deák, G.; Georgescu, P.-L. Sustainable Development Strategy for the Conservation of Wild Sturgeons in the Lower Danube in the Context of Climate Change and the European Green Deal; UEFISCDI Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 2023; pp. 383–412. ISBN 978-606-95687-2-9. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tudor, G.; Deak, G.; Arsene, M.; Holban, E.; Monica, M.; Boboc, M.; Raischi, M. Methodology for Identification of Areas with Possible Risk for Sturgeon Species Migration Disruption on The Lower Danube. E3S Web Conf. 2023, 437, 02006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nasir, N.A.N.M.; Zakarya, I.A.; Kamaruddin, S.A.; Islam, A.K.M.A. Advances and future prospects on biotechnological approaches towards Azolla for environmental sustainability. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2022, 45, 595–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xian, B.C.C.; Kang, C.W.; Ab Wahab, M.; Zainol, M.R.R.M.A.; Baharudin, F. Evaluation of low impact development and best management practices on peak flow reduction using SWMM. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci 2021, 646, 012045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Danalache, T.M.; Deák, G.; Holban, E.; Raischi, M.C.; Fronescu, D.S.; Nicolae, C.G.; Cristea, M.A. Evaluating the effect of the hydrotechnical works from the Danube’s Caleia branch on the spawning migration of sturgeons. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci 2020, 616, 012025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deak, G.Y.; Daescu, V.; Holban, E.; Marinescu, P.; Tanase, G.S.; Csergo, R.; Daescu, A.I.; Gaman, S. Health-environment relation: A key issue of Romanian environmental protection. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2015, 16, 304–315. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tudor, G.; Deák, G.; Uriţescu, B.; C-tin, C.; Nicolae, A.F.; Zamfir, S.; Dănălache, T.; Olteanu, M. Comparative Analysis of Hydrodynamic and Hydromorphological Parameters Variation Resulting from Anthropic Interventions on Lower Danube—Caleia Branch. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20193267770 (accessed on 18 March 2025).
  10. Ghita, G.; Ilie, M.; Tudor, G.; Arsene, M.; Luminarioiu, L.; Raischi, M.; Petrache, I. Investigations Regarding the Contamination with Emerging Pharmaceutical Pollutants in Representative Rivers and Lakes in Romania. E3S Web Conf. 2023, 437, 02008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nicolae, A.-F.; Zamfir, A.-Ș.; Georgescu, L.; Tudor, G.; Dumitru, D.-F.; Ilie, M.; Ghiță, G.; Raischi, M.C. Study regarding the dispersion of water quality indicators in the Danube river. Analele Univ. “Dunărea De Jos” Din Galați. Fasc. II Mat. Fiz. Mec. Teor. Ann. “Dunarea De Jos” Univ. Galati. Fascicle II Math. Phys. Theor. Mech. 2017, 40, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rząsa, S.; Owczarzak, W. Methods for the granulometric analysis of soil for science and practice. Pol. J. Soil Sci. 2013, XLVI/1, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  13. Blair, T.C.; McPherson, J.G. Grain-size and textural classification of coarse sedimentary particles. J. Sediment. Res. 1999, 69, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Krumbein, W.C. Size frequency distributions of sediments and the normal phi curve. J. Sediment. Res. 1938, 8, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of sediment sampling areas.
Figure 1. Location of sediment sampling areas.
Eesp 33 00009 g001
Figure 2. (a) Manual sieving and (b) mechanical sieving.
Figure 2. (a) Manual sieving and (b) mechanical sieving.
Eesp 33 00009 g002
Figure 3. Granulometric sample frequency for (a) PS_Bala_1; (b) PS_Bala_2; (c) PS_Bala_3; (d) PS_Bala_4; and (e) PS_Bala_5.
Figure 3. Granulometric sample frequency for (a) PS_Bala_1; (b) PS_Bala_2; (c) PS_Bala_3; (d) PS_Bala_4; and (e) PS_Bala_5.
Eesp 33 00009 g003
Figure 4. Cumulative frequency curves—Bala branch.
Figure 4. Cumulative frequency curves—Bala branch.
Eesp 33 00009 g004
Figure 5. Granulometric sample frequency for (a) PS_Caleia_1; (b) PS_ Caleia _2; (c) PS_ Caleia _3; (d) PS_ Caleia_4; and (e) PS_ Caleia _5.
Figure 5. Granulometric sample frequency for (a) PS_Caleia_1; (b) PS_ Caleia _2; (c) PS_ Caleia _3; (d) PS_ Caleia_4; and (e) PS_ Caleia _5.
Eesp 33 00009 g005
Figure 6. Cumulative frequency curves—Caleia branch.
Figure 6. Cumulative frequency curves—Caleia branch.
Eesp 33 00009 g006
Figure 7. The colour coding used for the parameters assessed.
Figure 7. The colour coding used for the parameters assessed.
Eesp 33 00009 g007
Table 1. Sediment sample granulometry—Bala branch.
Table 1. Sediment sample granulometry—Bala branch.
SampleSieve Diameter [mm]210.50.250.160.09<0.09Total
PS_Bala_1Sieve debris [g]0.0000.0000.41036.300202.09945.6013.027287.437
Gravimetric percentage [%]0.0000.0000.14312.62970.31115.8651.053100.000
PS_Bala_2Sieve debris [g]0.0000.0000.44516.800170.23251.2505.575244.302
Gravimetric percentage [%]0.0000.0000.1826.87769.68120.9782.282100.000
PS_Bala_3Sieve debris [g]0.0003.49410.69520.52877.36184.37133.278229.727
Gravimetric percentage [%]0.0001.5214.6568.93633.67536.72714.486100.000
PS_Bala_4Sieve debris [g]0.00016.02017.06632.88058.46667.13427.154218.720
Gravimetric percentage [%]0.0007.3247.80315.03326.73130.69412.415100.000
PS_Bala_5Sieve debris [g]0.0006.16042.22143.20239.34229.98318.565179.473
Gravimetric percentage [%]0.0003.43223.52524.07221.92116.70610.344100.000
Table 2. Sediment samples granulometry—Caleia branch.
Table 2. Sediment samples granulometry—Caleia branch.
SampleSieve Diameter [mm]210.50.250.160.09<0.09Total
PS_Caleia_1Sieve debris [g]5.8048.5705.43016.33626.32998.05042.474202.993
Gravimetric percentage [%]2.8594.2222.6758.04812.97048.30220.924100.000
PS_Caleia_2Sieve debris [g]5.80611.9376.2749.24914.01085.94066.399199.615
Gravimetric percentage [%]2.9095.9803.1434.6337.01943.05333.264100.000
PS_Caleia_3Sieve debris [g]6.22511.2205.6402.93314.639117.17642.572200.405
Gravimetric percentage [%]3.1065.5992.8141.4647.30558.47021.243100.000
PS_Caleia_4Sieve debris [g]6.05910.0397.59841.95854.36269.53829.371218.925
Gravimetric percentage [%]2.7684.5863.47119.16524.83131.76313.416100.000
PS_Caleia_5Sieve debris [g]4.01518.34014.69021.06116.75965.10260.015199.982
Gravimetric percentage [%]2.0089.1717.34610.5318.38032.55430.010100.000
Table 3. Granulometric curve parameters—Bala branch samples.
Table 3. Granulometric curve parameters—Bala branch samples.
SampleStandard DeviationSkewness IndexKurtosis Index
PS_Bala_10.0421.0780.810
PS_Bala_20.0520.1711.112
PS_Bala_30.1190.3422.054
PS_Bala_40.2510.6412.055
PS_Bala_50.2760.5350.839
Table 4. Granulometric curve parameters—Caleia branch samples.
Table 4. Granulometric curve parameters—Caleia branch samples.
SampleStandard DeviationSkewness IndexKurtosis Index
PS_Caleia_10.2740.7245.670
PS_Caleia_20.2980.71710.022
PS_Caleia_30.2780.60911.023
PS_Caleia_40.3050.6752.987
PS_Caleia_50.3980.8382.517
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sadîca, I.; Tudor, G.; Holban, E.; Arsene, M.; Carachiciu, M.; Cucu, G.; Stegărescu, S. Assessment of the Lower Danube Sediment Regime and Morphology for the Identification of Habitats for Critically Endangered Sturgeon. Environ. Earth Sci. Proc. 2025, 33, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025033009

AMA Style

Sadîca I, Tudor G, Holban E, Arsene M, Carachiciu M, Cucu G, Stegărescu S. Assessment of the Lower Danube Sediment Regime and Morphology for the Identification of Habitats for Critically Endangered Sturgeon. Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings. 2025; 33(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025033009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sadîca, Isabela, Georgeta Tudor, Elena Holban, Miruna Arsene, Maria Carachiciu, George Cucu, and Sorin Stegărescu. 2025. "Assessment of the Lower Danube Sediment Regime and Morphology for the Identification of Habitats for Critically Endangered Sturgeon" Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings 33, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025033009

APA Style

Sadîca, I., Tudor, G., Holban, E., Arsene, M., Carachiciu, M., Cucu, G., & Stegărescu, S. (2025). Assessment of the Lower Danube Sediment Regime and Morphology for the Identification of Habitats for Critically Endangered Sturgeon. Environmental and Earth Sciences Proceedings, 33(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/eesp2025033009

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop