Previous Article in Journal
Experimental and Analytical Studies on Electromagnetic Wave Propagation in DC Circuits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design of a Novel Ultra-Wideband Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna Based on Klopfenstein Curve

School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microwave 2025, 1(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/microwave1010004
Submission received: 21 April 2025 / Revised: 13 May 2025 / Accepted: 16 May 2025 / Published: 21 May 2025

Abstract

:
We propose a new ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antenna design based on the Klopfenstein curve, incorporating exponential slots, horns, and apertures to improve the antenna’s return loss and increase its gain in high-frequency bands. The antenna achieves high gain and wide bandwidth characteristics, with measured −10 dB bandwidth ranging from 2 GHz to 20 GHz, maximum gain of 14 dBi, and gain exceeding 10 dBi from 3.5 GHz to 14 GHz.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

With the continuous development of technology, radar systems have increasingly high requirements for imaging accuracy, detection range, and target quantity. Both the signal transmission and reception processes require antennas with higher bandwidth, gain, and more stable directivity characteristics, and research on ultrawideband antennas is increasing rapidly. As a traveling-wave antenna, the Vivaldi antenna has characteristics such as ultrawide bandwidth, high gain, and ease of processing, which have been extensively studied and applied in this field [1]. The Vivaldi antenna operates in resonance mode at low frequencies and in traveling-wave mode at high frequencies. The lowest resonance frequency is determined by the aperture width [2]. After P. J. Gibson proposed the coplanar slotted Vivaldi antenna, several researchers, including Ehud Gazit and J. D. S. Langley, proposed an improved Vivaldi antenna structure called the antipodal Vivaldi antenna (AVA), as well as a further improved balanced antipodal Vivaldi antenna (BAVA) [3,4]. Compared to the three-layer structure of the balanced antipodal Vivaldi antenna, the one-layer double-sided structure of the antipodal Vivaldi antenna is simpler and easier to manufacture, making it more applicable.
Many scholars have conducted extensive research on how to improve the performance of antipodal Vivaldi antennas, such as using split-ring resonator structures, multi-layer planar dielectric lenses, and metamaterial lens structures to focus the radiation beam and improve impedance matching performance [5,6,7], and using Chebyshev curves, cubic curves, and fern fractal leaf curves to extend matching bandwidth [8,9,10]. They have all proposed impressive curving structures, which vastly improved the impedance matching performance and directivity.
We found that the Klopfenstein curve has not yet been used in ultra-wideband complementary Vivaldi antennas [11]. The Klopfenstein curve is derived from the step Chebyshev transformer with an infinite number of sections, which theoretically achieves optimal impedance matching performance. The Klopfenstein curve is relatively flat at the front end and the end of the tapered slotline, which is conducive to low-frequency impedance matching and maintaining beamwidth, making it a high-performance tapered curve structure.
We propose a novel ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antenna utilizing the Klopfenstein curve, which significantly enhances impedance matching across the operating frequency range. The design also reduces sidelobes and boosts gain at high frequencies through innovative slotting, director loading, and perforation techniques. Simulations using Ansys HFSS were followed by fabrication and measurement in a Near-field Spherical Anechoic Chamber. The measured results closely align with the simulation, demonstrating the antenna’s excellent performance.
The proposed antenna structure is compact, small, easy to process, and has wider bandwidth and higher gain characteristics over the ultra-wide bandwidth. It can be used in radar detection, electronic reconnaissance, ultra-wideband communication, and many other fields.

2. Design and Performance Analysis of Proposed Antenna Structure

The newly designed ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antenna model based on the Klopfenstein curve is shown in Figure 1, with a size of 180 mm × 82 mm, using a 1 mm-thick Rogers RO4003C substrate (Suzhou, China) with a thickness of 3.55 and a thickness of 0.0027, and the radiation plate is bilaterally printed on both sides of the substrate. Newly designed internal and external curves, slotting, loading director, and perforating enhance the proposed antenna’s bandwidth and gain, achieving excellent sidelobe suppression.

2.1. Improved Impedance Matching with Klopfenstein Inner Curve Design

The internal curve is improved based on the Klopfenstein curve, which theoretically has the best impedance matching effect to extend impedance matching bandwidth and optimize in-band impedance matching performance. The curve is defined by the following equation [11]:
ln Z x = 1 2 ln Z 1 Z 2 + Γ 0 cosh A A 2 ϕ 2 x L 1 , A
The Γ 0 is calculated by the following equation:
Γ 0 = Z 2 Z 1 Z 2 + Z 1
The function ϕ x , A is determined by the equation below:
ϕ x , A = ϕ x , A = 0 x I 1 A 1 y 2 A 1 y 2 d y
I 1 is the first-kind modified Bessel function, which requires a simplified calculation method [12]:
ϕ x , A = 0 x 1 2 k = 0 A 2 4 k 1 y 2 k k ! k + 1 ! d y
By setting the opening width and A value, the final shape of the curve can be determined. According to the design principle of the Vivaldi antenna, the antenna aperture width is selected as 75 mm, and the optimized A value is chosen as 5. The outer curve is selected in the form of an exponential curve as follows, and α = 0.23 :
y = c 1 e α x + c 2
To match the 50 Ω antenna terminal, the impedance equation of the Vivaldi antenna is used as follows [13]:
Z 0 = 60 ε e ln 8 d w + w 4 d , w d 1 120 π ε e w d + 1.393 + 0.667 ln w d + 1.444 , w d 1
The calculated feed width is 2.24 mm, and the inner and outer curves of the antenna are connected to form the Klopfenstein curve Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna (KAVA), as shown in the Klopfenstein curve part in Figure 1. The Klopfenstein curve was first calculated with the equations above in Maple, then all the point data were imported into Ansys HFSS to obtain the correct shape of the antenna inner curve. The flowchart of the Klopfenstein curve is shown in Figure 2.
To further demonstrate the advantage of the Klopfenstein curve over the original exponential curve, the structure comparison between the Klopfenstein curve antipodal Vivaldi antenna and the original exponential antipodal Vivaldi antenna is shown in Figure 3, and the S11 comparison between the two is shown in Figure 4.
It can be seen from the S11 comparison in Figure 4 that using the Klopfenstein curve can significantly improve the impedance matching characteristics of the antenna over the entire frequency range, and the ultra-wideband impedance matching characteristics are stable. The flat characteristic of the Klopfenstein curve at the end of the slot line is beneficial for maintaining the beamwidth of the antenna. As shown in Figure 5, the main lobe beamwidth using the Klopfenstein curve is smaller than that of the traditional antipodal Vivaldi antenna, and the sidelobe level can be optimized and improved through surface slotting and other methods.

2.2. Sidelobe Suppression with Slotting Design

To improve the sidelobe and front-to-back ratio of KAVA, we proposed the Slotted Klopfenstein curve Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna (SKAVA) structure with quarter-wavelength long slots. The slots use the quarter-wavelength open-circuit principle, which can effectively suppress edge currents on the surface and reduce the radiation caused by edge currents. The slotted structure extends the current path, which can improve impedance matching performance.
The starting length of the slot is designed to be 3 mm, and the terminating length is 22 mm. At lower frequencies, narrower slots cannot maintain good edge current suppression over a wide bandwidth. Therefore, we used a variable-width slotting structure, with a wide slot width of 2 mm at lower frequencies and a narrow slot width of 1 mm at higher frequencies, so that the effective edge current suppression effect can cover the required frequency range from 2 GHz to 20 GHz.
The slotting structure length variation adopted an exponential curve, as shown in Figure 6. The SKAVA antenna with a slotted structure significantly improves both the sidelobe and front-to-back ratio compared to the traditional antipodal Vivaldi antenna, as shown in the comparison of directivity patterns in Figure 7.
The comparison of surface current and S11 curve between SKAVA and KAVA is shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9. As can be seen from Figure 6, the edge currents on the surface are significantly reduced after slotting, and the current at the main lobe radiation direction becomes more concentrated while the sidelobe is significantly smaller.
It can be seen from Figure 7 that better impedance matching performance is achieved from 5 GHz to 15 GHz after slotting.

2.3. Gain Enhancement by Adding the Director

The gain characteristic of SKAVA decreases from 11 GHz to 16 GHz. This is due to the decreased coupling coefficient between the radiating plates at high frequencies, causing discontinuity in the radiation electric field at the aperture of the antenna. To solve this problem, we load a metal director in the shape of a water drop at the aperture of the antenna, which forms the Slotted Klopfenstein curve Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna with Director (DSKAVA), as shown in the director part in Figure 1.
The director is located inside the antenna, which does not increase the size of the antenna. It can improve the coupling coefficient between the radiating plates, concentrate the radiation beam, and increase the gain characteristic of the antenna. As can be seen from Figure 10, after loading the director, the gain characteristic is significantly improved, with a gain of more than 15 dBi from 8 GHz to 10 GHz, and up to 7 dB improvement compared to SKAVA from 11 GHz to 16 GHz.
Figure 11 shows the comparison of the S11 between DSKAVA and SKAVA. As can be seen, the impedance matching does not deteriorate after loading the director. The size-optimized drip-shaped director improves the impedance matching performance from 15 GHz to 20 GHz, meeting the bandwidth requirement of 2–20 GHz.
The director significantly improves the gain performance of the antenna without increasing the size of the antenna or affecting other performance.

2.4. Further Sidelobe Suppression with Perforating Design

After loading the director, the sidelobe and front-to-back ratio were slightly degraded due to signal reflection. To solve this problem, two holes of different sizes were trepanned at the tail of the antenna, which form the Perforating Slotted Klopfenstein curve Antenna with Director (TDSKAVA), as shown in the perforating part in Figure 1. Perforating can further suppress surface currents at the rear end, improve the antenna’s sidelobe and back lobe suppression performance, reducing the sidelobe level and improving the front-to-back ratio. The directivity simulation results of the antenna between TDSKAVA and DSKAVA are shown in Figure 12.
As can be seen from Figure 12, the sidelobe level is reduced after perforating, indicating that perforating has a significant optimizing effect on the antenna’s sidelobe performance.
As can be seen from Figure 13, the overall impedance match of the antenna does not deteriorate after perforating, and it meets the bandwidth requirements of 2–20 GHz.
Figure 14 shows the comparison of the front-to-back ratio of the four improved antenna structures, which demonstrates that measures such as slotting, loading director, and perforating can significantly improve the front-to-back ratio performance of the antenna. Compared to the original Klopfenstein curve Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna, the front-to-back ratio can be improved by more than 10 dB on average, and the front-to-back ratio of the antenna can reach 40 dB at 8.8 GHz, with an average front-to-back ratio of over 15 dB.
Figure 15 shows the gain comparison of four improved antenna structures, which demonstrates that the loading director can greatly increase the gain characteristic, with the highest gain exceeding 15 dBi from 8 GHz to 10 GHz and an increase of up to 7 dB compared to not loading the director from 11 GHz to 16 GHz.
Finally, we propose a new type of ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antenna based on the Klopfenstein curve (TDSKAVA) by changing the internal curve shape of the antenna through the Klopfenstein curve, using a quarter-wavelength slot line with width variation and length index variation, loading a droplet-shaped director within the antenna radiation aperture, and perforating at the tail of the antenna. The simulation results of antenna gain are greater than 5 dBi over the entire frequency range, and greater than 10 dBi from 3.5 GHz to 16 GHz, with a maximum gain of over 15 dBi and −10 dB bandwidth of 2–20 GHz, meeting the requirements for ultra-wideband and high-gain applications.
Figure 16 shows the schematic of the overall parameters of the new ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antenna based on the Klopfenstein curve (TDSKAVA), and Table 1 provides the list of the antenna design parameters.

3. Antenna Measurement

To further verify the feasibility of the proposed new ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antenna design, we have conducted the fabrication and measurement of the design. We used Rogers RO4003C substrate, and metal plates were printed on the upper and lower surfaces of the substrate. The feeding connector is an SMP terminal, and the frequency range of the terminal is DC—40 GHz. The SMP terminal is welded together with the antenna, and Figure 17 shows the front and back views of the overall structure of the antenna. The anaerobic chamber is a Near-Field Spherical Anechoic Chamber with a KEYSIGHT PNA-X N5242B VNA (Santa Rosa, CA, USA) with a bandwidth of 10 MHz to 26.5 GHz. The Near-Field Spherical Anechoic Chamber has conducted S11 parameter testing and directivity and gain testing from 2 GHz to 20 GHz. The connection and impedance matching of the cable to the antenna connector were conducted by engineers at the University of Electronic Science and Technology, and all tests have been run multiple times to obtain precise results with automated measurement support. The feed transition design is a coaxial-to-microstrip transition.
Figure 18 shows the comparison between simulated and measured S11 parameters of the new ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antenna based on the Klopfenstein curve. The impedance bandwidth is basically consistent, with better performance in the low- to mid-frequency range than in simulation results, and slightly weaker in the mid- to high-frequency range. The −10 dB bandwidth is slightly wider than the simulation result, which may be due to processing and testing differences.
Figure 19 shows the comparison between the simulated and measured gain of the antenna. The maximum gain measured exceeds 14 dBi, and the trend is consistent with the simulation. The difference between measurement and simulation is less than 1 dB below 10 GHz and about 2 dB beyond 14 GHz, and the overall gain characteristic matches well. The antenna can still achieve a gain of more than 10 dBi within the frequency range of 3.5–14 GHz, and the difference caused by factors such as processing, welding, and the terminal is within a reasonable range. Figure 20 and Figure 21 show the comparison of simulated and measured radiation patterns of the antenna. Due to the influence of the manufacturing and testing environment, the measured sidelobe of the antenna above 10 GHz increases compared to the simulation, with less than a 2 dB difference. However, the overall main-to-side-lobe ratio is still at a relatively good level, and the main lobe is consistent with the simulation. This verifies the feasibility and high performance of the design of our newly designed ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antenna based on the Klopfenstein curve.
Table 2 compares the newly designed ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antenna based on the Klopfenstein curve with other ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antennas from relevant references. Compared with other ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antennas, our design integrates multiple methods such as the Klopfenstein curve, slotting, loading director, and perforating, achieving smaller physical size and electrical size, wider relative bandwidth, and higher and smoother gain across the entire frequency range. According to all the references, our work has achieved the most stable −10 dB bandwidth and maintains high gain through a large operating range. Compared with other similar antennas, our work outperforms others with the highest gain through the whole operating range while maintaining a bandwidth of 2–20 GHz and keeping a relatively small form factor.

4. Conclusions

We proposed a novel ultra-wideband high-gain antipodal Vivaldi antenna based on the Klopfenstein curve with dimensions of 180 mm × 82 mm × 1 mm, a −10 dB bandwidth from 2 GHz to 20 GHz, and a relative bandwidth of 163%. The antenna is characterized by excellent directivity characteristics and high gain throughout the operating frequency range, with a measured gain exceeding 5 dBi across the entire frequency range, exceeding 10 dBi from 3.5 GHz to 14 GHz, and reaching a maximum gain of over 14 dBi. The measurement results of the antenna match well with simulation results, verifying the feasibility and high performance of our design. Our design has reference value for the research of ultra-wideband antennas and is suitable for multiple fields such as radar detection, electronic reconnaissance, and ultra-wideband communications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z.; methodology, Y.Z.; validation, Y.Z.; formal analysis, Y.Z.; investigation, Y.Z.; data curation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z. and J.Z.; visualization, Y.Z.; supervision, J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data are contained in the article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Vacuum Electronics, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62271063), and the Director Fund of Beijing Key Laboratory of Space–Ground Interconnection and Convergence.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AVAAntipodal Vivaldi antenna
BAVABalanced antipodal Vivaldi antenna
KAVAKlopfenstein curve Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna
SKAVASlotted Klopfenstein curve Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna
DSKAVASlotted Klopfenstein curve Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna with Director
TDSKAVAPerforating Slotted Klopfenstein curve Antenna with Director

References

  1. Moosazadeh, M.; Kharkovsky, S.; Esmati, Z.; Samali, B. UWB elliptically-tapered antipodal Vivaldi antenna for microwave imaging applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE-APS Topical Conference on Antennas and Propagation in Wireless Communications (APWC), Cairns, QLD, Australia, 19–23 September 2016; pp. 102–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nassar, I.T.; Weller, T.M. A Novel Method for Improving Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna Performance. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015, 63, 3321–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gazit, E. Improved design of the Vivaldi antenna. IEE Proc. H Microw. Antennas Propag. 1988, 135, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Langley, J.D.S.; Hall, P.S.; Newham, P. Novel ultrawide-bandwidth Vivaldi antenna with low crosspolarisation. Electron. Lett. 1993, 29, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, H.-X.; Gao, J.; Cao, X.; Liu, Y.-F.; Zhang, D.; Li, S.-J. A design of high-gain end-fire antenna based on split-ring resonator structures. Acta Phys. Sin. 2015, 64, 234101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, D.; Yang, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, F.; Liu, X. A high-gain antipodal Vivaldi antenna with multi-layer planar dielectric lens. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2017, 32, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pan, S.; Lin, M.; Qi, L.; Chen, P.; Feng, Y.; Li, G. Performance enhancement for antipodal Vivaldi antenna modulated by a high-permittivity metasurface lens. Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng. 2021, 22, 1655–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gorai, A.; Karmakar, A.; Pal, M.; Ghatak, R. A super wideband Chebyshev tapered antipodal Vivaldi antenna. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2015, 69, 1328–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Clavin, H.; Das, S.; Sharma, S.K. Design of a High Gain Broadband Balanced Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna with 3D Dielectric Lens. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting (AP-S/URSI), Denver, CO, USA, 10–15 July 2022; pp. 717–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Biswas, B.; Ghatak, R.; Poddar, D.R. A Fern Fractal Leaf Inspired Wideband Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna for Microwave Imaging System. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 6126–6129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Klopfenstein, R.W. A Transmission Line Taper of Improved Design. Proc. IRE 1956, 44, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Grossberg, M.A. Extremely rapid computation of the Klopfenstein impedance taper. Proc. IEEE 1968, 56, 1629–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pozar, D.M. Microwave Engineering, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 144–145. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shi, X.; Cao, Y.; Hu, Y.; Luo, X.; Yang, H.; Ye, L.H. A High-Gain Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna with Director and Metamaterial at 1–28 GHz. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2021, 20, 2432–2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Z.; Yin, Y.; Wu, J.; Lian, R. A Miniaturized CPW-Fed Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna with Enhanced Radiation Performance for Wideband Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Natarajan, R.; George, J.V.; Kanagasabai, M.; Shrivastav, A.K. A Compact Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna for UWB Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2015, 14, 1557–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Tian, M.; Liu, J.; Liu, H. A compact wide-band antipodal Vivaldi antenna design. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput.-Aided Eng. 2018, 29, e21598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moosazadeh, M.; Kharkovsky, S.; Case, J.T.; Samali, B. Antipodal Vivaldi antenna with improved radiation characteristics for civil engineering applications. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2017, 11, 796–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sang, L.; Wu, S.; Liu, G.; Wang, J.; Huang, W. High-Gain UWB Vivaldi Antenna Loaded with Reconfigurable 3-D Phase Adjusting Unit Lens. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2020, 19, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dixit, A.S.; Kumar, S. A Survey of Performance Enhancement Techniques of Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 45774–45796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eichenberger, J.; Yetisir, E.; Ghalichechian, N. High-Gain Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna with Pseudoelement and Notched Tapered Slot Operating at (2.5 to 57) GHz. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2019, 67, 4357–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Honari, M.M.; Ghaffarian, M.S.; Mirzavand, R. Miniaturized Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna with Improved Bandwidth Using Exponential Strip Arms. Electronics 2021, 10, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of proposed antenna: (a) front view; (b) feeding structure view.
Figure 1. Structure of proposed antenna: (a) front view; (b) feeding structure view.
Microwave 01 00004 g001
Figure 2. Flowchart of forming the Klopfenstein curve in Ansys HFSS.
Figure 2. Flowchart of forming the Klopfenstein curve in Ansys HFSS.
Microwave 01 00004 g002
Figure 3. Structure comparison between KAVA and AVA: (a) KAVA; (b) AVA.
Figure 3. Structure comparison between KAVA and AVA: (a) KAVA; (b) AVA.
Microwave 01 00004 g003
Figure 4. S11 comparison between KAVA and AVA; the grey line represents the original AVA, and the green line represents the improved AVA with the Klopfenstein curve.
Figure 4. S11 comparison between KAVA and AVA; the grey line represents the original AVA, and the green line represents the improved AVA with the Klopfenstein curve.
Microwave 01 00004 g004
Figure 5. 6 GHz directivity pattern comparison between KAVA and AVA; the grey line is the original AVA, and the green line is the improved AVA with the Klopfenstein curve.
Figure 5. 6 GHz directivity pattern comparison between KAVA and AVA; the grey line is the original AVA, and the green line is the improved AVA with the Klopfenstein curve.
Microwave 01 00004 g005
Figure 6. Structure of SKAVA; near the back are long slots with wider width, and near the front are shorter slots with narrower width.
Figure 6. Structure of SKAVA; near the back are long slots with wider width, and near the front are shorter slots with narrower width.
Microwave 01 00004 g006
Figure 7. Directivity pattern comparison between SKAVA and KAVA; the green line is KAVA, and the purple line is KAVA with slotting: (a) 6 GHz directivity pattern; (b) 15 GHz directivity pattern.
Figure 7. Directivity pattern comparison between SKAVA and KAVA; the green line is KAVA, and the purple line is KAVA with slotting: (a) 6 GHz directivity pattern; (b) 15 GHz directivity pattern.
Microwave 01 00004 g007
Figure 8. Surface edge current comparison between SKAVA and KAVA; the upper one is original KAVA, and the lower one is KAVA with slotting.
Figure 8. Surface edge current comparison between SKAVA and KAVA; the upper one is original KAVA, and the lower one is KAVA with slotting.
Microwave 01 00004 g008
Figure 9. S11 comparison between SKAVA and KAVA; the green line is original KAVA, and the purple line is KAVA with slotting.
Figure 9. S11 comparison between SKAVA and KAVA; the green line is original KAVA, and the purple line is KAVA with slotting.
Microwave 01 00004 g009
Figure 10. Gain characteristic comparison between DSKAVA and SKAVA; the purple line is the original SKAVA; and the blue line is SKAVA with director.
Figure 10. Gain characteristic comparison between DSKAVA and SKAVA; the purple line is the original SKAVA; and the blue line is SKAVA with director.
Microwave 01 00004 g010
Figure 11. S11 comparison between DSKAVA and SKAVA; the purple line is original SKAVA, and the blue line is SKAVA with director.
Figure 11. S11 comparison between DSKAVA and SKAVA; the purple line is original SKAVA, and the blue line is SKAVA with director.
Microwave 01 00004 g011
Figure 12. Directivity pattern comparison between TDSKAVA and DSKAVA; the blue line is original DSKAVA, and the red line is DSKAVA with perforating: (a) Directivity at 6 GHz; (b) Directivity at 10 GHz.
Figure 12. Directivity pattern comparison between TDSKAVA and DSKAVA; the blue line is original DSKAVA, and the red line is DSKAVA with perforating: (a) Directivity at 6 GHz; (b) Directivity at 10 GHz.
Microwave 01 00004 g012
Figure 13. S11 comparison between TDSKAVA and DSKAVA; the blue line is the original DSKAVA, and the red line is DSKAVA with perforating.
Figure 13. S11 comparison between TDSKAVA and DSKAVA; the blue line is the original DSKAVA, and the red line is DSKAVA with perforating.
Microwave 01 00004 g013
Figure 14. Front-to-back ratio comparison of the four improved structures; the green line is the original AVA with Klopfenstein curve, the purple line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve and slotting, the blue line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve, slotting, and director, and the red line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve, slotting, director, and perforating.
Figure 14. Front-to-back ratio comparison of the four improved structures; the green line is the original AVA with Klopfenstein curve, the purple line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve and slotting, the blue line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve, slotting, and director, and the red line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve, slotting, director, and perforating.
Microwave 01 00004 g014
Figure 15. Gain comparison of the four improved structures; the green line is the original AVA with Klopfenstein curve, the purple line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve and slotting, the blue line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve, slotting, and director, and the red line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve, slotting, director, and perforating.
Figure 15. Gain comparison of the four improved structures; the green line is the original AVA with Klopfenstein curve, the purple line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve and slotting, the blue line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve, slotting, and director, and the red line is AVA with Klopfenstein curve, slotting, director, and perforating.
Microwave 01 00004 g015
Figure 16. Structure parameters of TDSKAVA.
Figure 16. Structure parameters of TDSKAVA.
Microwave 01 00004 g016
Figure 17. Front and back views of TDSKAVA: (a) Antenna front view; (b) Antenna back view.
Figure 17. Front and back views of TDSKAVA: (a) Antenna front view; (b) Antenna back view.
Microwave 01 00004 g017
Figure 18. S11 comparison between TDSKAVA and measurement; the red line is the simulation result of the proposed antenna, and the black line is the real measurement result of the proposed antenna.
Figure 18. S11 comparison between TDSKAVA and measurement; the red line is the simulation result of the proposed antenna, and the black line is the real measurement result of the proposed antenna.
Microwave 01 00004 g018
Figure 19. Gain comparison between TDSKAVA and measurement; the red line is the simulation result of the proposed antenna, and the black line is the real measurement result of the proposed antenna.
Figure 19. Gain comparison between TDSKAVA and measurement; the red line is the simulation result of the proposed antenna, and the black line is the real measurement result of the proposed antenna.
Microwave 01 00004 g019
Figure 20. Directivity comparison between TDSKAVA and measurement; the red line is the simulation result of the proposed antenna, and the black line is the real measurement result of the proposed antenna: (a) 3 GHz; (b) 6 GHz.
Figure 20. Directivity comparison between TDSKAVA and measurement; the red line is the simulation result of the proposed antenna, and the black line is the real measurement result of the proposed antenna: (a) 3 GHz; (b) 6 GHz.
Microwave 01 00004 g020
Figure 21. Directivity comparison between TDSKAVA and measurement; the red line is the simulation result of the proposed antenna, and the black line is the real measurement result of the proposed antenna: (a) 10 GHz; (b) 15 GHz.
Figure 21. Directivity comparison between TDSKAVA and measurement; the red line is the simulation result of the proposed antenna, and the black line is the real measurement result of the proposed antenna: (a) 10 GHz; (b) 15 GHz.
Microwave 01 00004 g021
Table 1. Specific structure parameters of TDSKAVA.
Table 1. Specific structure parameters of TDSKAVA.
ParameterValueParameterValue
L180 mmx30
W82 mmy3−1.12 mm
W175.22 mma10.23
h1 mma20.02
d2.24 mmx541 mm
x140 mmy5−19 mm
y141 mmy6−38 mm
x13100 mmy1311 mm
x14160 mmy1411 mm
x1542 mmy154 mm
x1634 mma20 mm
b11 mmcr6 mm
mr2.5 mm
Table 2. Comparison between TDSKAVA and other ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antennas.
Table 2. Comparison between TDSKAVA and other ultra-wideband antipodal Vivaldi antennas.
Bandwidth
(GHz)
Size
(mm)
Electric Size
(λ)
Gain/Lowest Point
(dBi/GHz)
Gain/Highest Point
(dBi/GHz)
This passage2–20180 × 821.81 × 0.825.62/214.3/8
Reference [7]3.1–14130 × 762.75 × 1.615.8/3.17.26/10
Reference [14]1–28260 × 1201.3 × 0.64.9/114.4/18
Reference [15]1.35–1793.5 × 900.69 × 0.663.59.3
Reference [16]3.7–1842 × 361.09 × 0.931.86.9
Reference [17]3.01–10.634 × 160.73 × 0.343.27/3.016.23/10.6
Reference [18]1.65–18202 × 1202.04 × 1.216.7/1.6510.3/3
Reference [19]6–1868 × 521.7 × 2.210.7/612.7/12
Reference [20]1.13–12130 × 80-2.2714
Reference [21]2.5–57186 × 77-4/2.715/29.8
Reference [22]0.72–17158 × 1250.3 × 0.38112.5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J. Design of a Novel Ultra-Wideband Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna Based on Klopfenstein Curve. Microwave 2025, 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/microwave1010004

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Zhang J. Design of a Novel Ultra-Wideband Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna Based on Klopfenstein Curve. Microwave. 2025; 1(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/microwave1010004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yanxing, and Jinling Zhang. 2025. "Design of a Novel Ultra-Wideband Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna Based on Klopfenstein Curve" Microwave 1, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/microwave1010004

APA Style

Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2025). Design of a Novel Ultra-Wideband Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna Based on Klopfenstein Curve. Microwave, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/microwave1010004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop