Next Article in Journal
Editorial: Changing Times
Previous Article in Journal
Tongue Thrust in Adults
 
 
International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy is published by MDPI from Volume 51 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with the previous journal publisher.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth Changes in the Soft Tissue Facial Profile

by
Ram S. Nanda
,
Hanspeter Meng
,
Sunil Kapila
and
Jolande Goorhuis
Department of Orthodontics, Division of Developmental Dentistry, University of Oklahoma, P.O. Box 26901, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, USA
Int. J. Orofac. Myol. Myofunct. Ther. 1991, 17(1), 10-21; https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.1991.17.1.4
Submission received: 1 March 1991 / Revised: 1 March 1991 / Accepted: 1 March 1991 / Published: 1 March 1991

Abstract

Longitudinal growth changes in the soft tissue profile of 40 caucasians between the ages of 7 and 18 were studied. The sample consisted of 17 males and 23 females who had Class I dentitions and balanced faces at age 7 and 18 years. None of the subjects received any orthodontic treatment. Cephalometric radiographs were available, as a rule, on a yearly basis. Soft tissue thickness, measured at the nose, upper lip, lower lip and chin, as well as the length of the upper and lower lip, all increased by varying amounts over the period of the study. Females acquired more growth as a percentage of their adult size (at age 18) than males in all variables except the angle of inclination of the skeletal chin which increased more in males. The largest increase in relative size was noted in the nose measurements. In males, the nose had not attained adult size even at age 18. Upper lip length growth, on the other hand, in both males and females was complete by the 15th year. The difference between male and female lip length growth was clinically significant; the average aggregate in­crease in upper and lower lips combined in males was 6.9 millimeters compared to 2.65 millimeters in females. The total gain in thickness at laberale superius was over four times as much in males as in females and continued to increase in males even at age 18. The change in thickness of the soft tissue at pogonion was not large, an average of 2.4 millimeters in males and 1.5 millimeters in females. The major contribution to the anterior growth of the chin was translatory, contributed largely by growth in the skeletal length from pogonion to pterygomaxillary plane. This paper was presented to the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists, North Atlantic Component, at its annual meeting in Pone Vedra, Florida April 5, 1989.
Keywords: soft tissue profile; longitudinal growth; nose; lips; chin; pterygomaxillary vertical plane; nasolabial angle; mentolabial angle soft tissue profile; longitudinal growth; nose; lips; chin; pterygomaxillary vertical plane; nasolabial angle; mentolabial angle

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nanda, R.S.; Meng, H.; Kapila, S.; Goorhuis, J. Growth Changes in the Soft Tissue Facial Profile. Int. J. Orofac. Myol. Myofunct. Ther. 1991, 17, 10-21. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.1991.17.1.4

AMA Style

Nanda RS, Meng H, Kapila S, Goorhuis J. Growth Changes in the Soft Tissue Facial Profile. International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy. 1991; 17(1):10-21. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.1991.17.1.4

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nanda, Ram S., Hanspeter Meng, Sunil Kapila, and Jolande Goorhuis. 1991. "Growth Changes in the Soft Tissue Facial Profile" International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy 17, no. 1: 10-21. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.1991.17.1.4

APA Style

Nanda, R. S., Meng, H., Kapila, S., & Goorhuis, J. (1991). Growth Changes in the Soft Tissue Facial Profile. International Journal of Orofacial Myology and Myofunctional Therapy, 17(1), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.52010/ijom.1991.17.1.4

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop