Silky Fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus) Dietary Supplementation with Dried Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum): Effects on Egg Quality, Blood Biochemical Parameters, and Egg Storage Stability
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design, Feeding Regimens, and Animal Management
2.2. Sample Preparation
2.3. Evaluation of Egg Quality Parameters
2.4. pH Measurement
2.5. Blood Sampling and Biochemical Analysis
2.6. Determination of Yolk Carotenoids
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Yolk Pigmentation and Carotenoid Levels in Raw Eggs Maintained at 25 °C
3.2. Influence of Storage Temperature on Yolk Carotenoid Levels and Egg Quality
3.3. Correlations Between Yolk Color Scores and CIELAB Parameters
3.4. Blood Biochemical Parameters
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| RYCF | Roche Yolk Color Fan |
| SF | silky fowl |
| HDL-C | high-density lipoprotein cholesterol |
| TG | triglyceride |
| EU | European Union |
| HUs | Haugh units |
| YI | yolk index |
| L* | lightness |
| a* | redness |
| b* | yellowness |
| a/b | redness-to-yellowness ratio |
| T-Cho | total cholesterol |
| HDL/T | HDL-C-to-total cholesterol ratio |
References
- Galobart, J.; Sala, R.; Rincoón-Carruyo, X.; Manzanilla, E.G.; Vilà, B.; Gasa, J. Egg yolk color as affected by saponification of different natural pigmenting sources. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2004, 13, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, K.M.S.; Khalil, M.; Männer, K.; Raila, J.; Rawel, H.; Zentek, J.; Schweigert, F.J. Lutein specific relationships among some spectrophotometric and colorimetric parameters of chicken egg yolk. J. Poult. Sci. 2017, 54, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, S.; Li, R.; Heng, N.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Guo, Y.; Sheng, X.; Wang, X.; Xing, K.; et al. Effects of dietary supplementation of natural astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis on antioxidant capacity, lipid metabolism, and accumulation in the egg yolk of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 5874–5882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Panaite, T.D.; Nour, V.; Saracila, M.; Turcu, R.P.; Untea, A.E.; Vlaicu, P.A. Effects of linseed meal and carotenoids from different sources on egg characteristics, yolk fatty acid and carotenoid profile and lipid peroxidation. Foods 2021, 10, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kojima, S.; Koizumi, S.; Kawami, Y.; Shigeta, Y.; Osawa, A. Effect of dietary carotenoid on egg yolk color and singlet oxygen quenching activity of laying hens. J. Poult. Sci. 2022, 59, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, J.R. Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. J. Poult. Sci. 2004, 41, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sünder, A.; Wilkens, M.; Böhm, V.; Liebert, F. Egg yolk colour in organic production as affected by feeding—Consequences for farmers and consumers. Food Chem. 2022, 382, 131854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, Z.; Fu, J.; Gao, Y.; Liu, F. Influence of paprika extract supplement on egg quality of laying hens fed wheat-based diet. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2008, 7, 887–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Jin, L.; Wu, F.; Thacker, P.; Li, X.; You, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, S.; Li, S.; Xu, Y. Effect of red pepper (Capsicum frutescens) powder or red pepper pigment on the performance and egg yolk color of laying hens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 25, 1605–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sözcü, A. Effects of supplementing layer hen diet with red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) powder as natural yolk colourant on laying performance, pigmentation of yolk, egg quality and serum immunoglobulin levels. J. Poult. Res. 2019, 16, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanif, M.F.; Ariyadi, B.; Muhlisin, M.; Agus, A. Effect of pepper (Capsicum sp) on productivity and egg quality of laying hens: A meta-analysis. Vet. Integr. Sci. 2024, 22, 749–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleh, A.A.; Gawish, E.; Mahmoud, S.F.; Amber, K.; Awad, W.; Alzawqari, M.H.; Shukry, M.; Abdel-Moneim, A.-M.E. Effect of natural and chemical colorant supplementation on performance, egg-quality characteristics, yolk fatty-acid profile, and blood constituents in laying hens. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abou-Elkhair, R.; Selim, S.; Hussein, E. Effect of supplementing layer hen diet with phytogenic feed additives on laying performance, egg quality, egg lipid peroxidation and blood biochemical constituents. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 4, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kojima, S. Impact of high-dose supplemental paprika extract feeding on egg storage and biochemical parameters in laying hens. Animals 2024, 14, 2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nozaki, A.; Makita, T. The surface color measurement of major tissues of silky fowls and white leghorns. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 1998, 60, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kojima, S.; Saegusa, H.; Sakata, M. Histidine-containing dipeptide concentration and antioxidant effects of meat extracts from silky fowl: Comparison with meat-type chicken breast and thigh meats. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2014, 20, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akishinonomiya, F.; Kakizawa, R.; Roberts, M.; Roberts, V. Illustrated Encyclopedia of European Poultry, 1st ed.; Heibonsya: Tokyo, Japan, 1994; pp. 40–41. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, Y.H.; Lee, K.T.; Lee, W.I.; Han, Y.K. Effects of storage temperature and time on the quality of eggs from laying hens at peak production. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 24, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagan, J.K.; Adjei, I.A.; Baah, A. Effects of extended period of storage and strain of layer on quality of chicken eggs. J. Sci. Technol. 2013, 33, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kralik, Z.; Kralik, G.; Košević, M.; Galović, D. Effect of storage period on the quality of table eggs. Acta Agrar. Kaposváriensis 2014, 18, 200–206. [Google Scholar]
- Marzec, A.; Damaziak, K.; Damaziak, H.; Kowalska, H.; Riedel, J.; Michalczuk, M.; Koczywas, E.; Cisneros, F.; Lenart, A.; Niemiec, J. Effect of hens age and storage time on functional and physiochemical properties of eggs. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2019, 28, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shidara, H.; Koizumi, A.; Mineki, M. Effect of storage for 2 weeks at 5 °C or 25 °C on the taste of chicken eggs–Comparison with eggs on the third day of egg laying. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 2020, 57, J45–J52. [Google Scholar]
- Heng, N.; Gao, S.; Guo, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L.; Sheng, X.; Wang, X.; Xing, K.; Xiao, L.; Hemi, N. Effects of supplementing natural astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis to laying hens on egg quality during storage at 4 °C and 25 °C. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 6877–6883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dansou, D.M.; Wang, H.; Nugroho, R.D.; He, W.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, Z. Assessment of response to moderate and high dose supplementation of astaxanthin in laying hens. Animals 2021, 11, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obianwuna, U.E.; Oleforuh-Okoleh, V.U.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.-J.; Qi, G.-H.; Qiu, K.; Wu, S.-G. Potential implications of natural antioxidants of plant origin on oxidative stability of chicken albumen during storage: A review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Britton, G.; Liaanen-Jensen, S.; Pfander, H. (Eds.) Carotenoids Handbook; Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel, Switzerland; Boston, MA, USA; Berlin, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Ihaka, R.; Gentleman, R.R. A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 1996, 5, 299–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shevchenko, L.V.; Iakubchak, O.M.; Davydovych, V.A.; Honchar, V.V.; Ciorga, M.; Hartung, J.; Kołacz, R. Influence of lycopene and astaxanthin in feed on metabolic parameters of laying hens, yolk color of eggs and their content of carotenoids and vitamin A when stored under refrigerated conditions. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2021, 4, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hinton, C.F.; Fry, J.L.; Harms, R.H. Influence of a xanthophyll-free pullet grower diet on subsequent egg yolk pigmentation. Poult. Sci. 1974, 53, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamilton, P.B.; Tirado, F.J.; Garcia-Hernandez, F. Deposition in egg yolks of the carotenoids from saponified and unsaponified oleoresin of red pepper (Capsicum annuum) fed to laying hens. Poult. Sci. 1990, 69, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP). Safety and efficacy of saponified paprika extract, containing capsanthin as main carotenoid source, for poultry for fattening and laying (except turkeys). EFSA J. 2020, 18, 6023.
- Wang, F.; Lin, H.; Xu, P.; Bi, X.; Sun, L. Egg freshness evaluation using transmission and reflection of NIR spectroscopy coupled multivariate analysis. Foods 2021, 10, 2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quan, C.; Xi, Q.; Shi, X.; Han, R.; Du, Q.; Forghani, F.; Xue, C.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J. Development of predictive models for egg freshness and shelf-life under different storage temperatures. Food Qual. Saf. 2021, 5, fyab021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heath, J.L. Chemical and related osmotic changes in egg albumen during storage. Poult. Sci. 1977, 56, 822–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodrum, J.W.; Britton, W.M.; Davis, J.B. Effect of storage conditions on albumen pH and subsequent hard-cooked egg peelability and albumen shear strength. Poult. Sci. 1989, 68, 1226–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moeini, M.M.; Ghazi, S.H.; Sadeghi, S.; Malekizadeh, M. The effect of red pepper (Capsicum annuum) and marigold flower (Tagetes erectus) powder on egg production, egg yolk color and some blood metabolites of laying hens. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2013, 3, 301–305. [Google Scholar]
- Aikpitanyi, K.U.; Imasuen, J.A. Evaluation of blood biochemical indices and egg yolk lipid profile in laying hens fed diets with black pepper and red pepper additives. Eur. J. Vet. Med. 2024, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.; Ai, M.; Miao, J.; Yan, S.; Du, Y.; Zhang, J.; Tang, C.; Zhang, K. Effects of chili meal supplementation on productive performance, intestinal health, and liver lipid metabolism of laying hens fed low-protein diets. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Ingredient | Content (%) |
| Corn | 49.70 |
| Brown rice | 5.40 |
| Wheat bran | 1.00 |
| Defatted rice bran | 4.00 |
| Distiller’s dried grains with solubles (corn DDGS) | 1.00 |
| Soybean meal | 25.20 |
| Fish meal | 0.50 |
| Animal fat | 2.90 |
| Calcium carbonate | 9.10 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 0.76 |
| Salt | 0.20 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.10 |
| Paprika extract | 0.02 |
| Premix and others | 0.12 |
| Total | 100.00 |
| Nutrient Composition | Value |
| Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg) | 2800 |
| Crude protein (%) | 17.20 |
| Crude fat (%) | 5.40 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 2.60 |
| Crude ash (%) | 13.00 |
| Calcium (%) | 4.00 |
| Phosphorus (%) | 0.57 |
| Storage Period (Day) | SEM | p-Value 2 | r 4 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Diet 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 21 | AN | L | Q | ||
| YCFS 5 | Cont | 10.2 ab,y | 10.0 b,y | 10.0 b,y | 10.2 ab,y | 10.2 ab,y | 11.0 a,y | 10.4 ab,y | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.41 |
| LS | 14.6 x | 14.5 x | 13.9 x | 14.0 x | 14.6 x | 14.2 x | 13.7 x | 0.14 | 0.43 | 0.18 | 0.34 | −0.16 | |
| HS | 15.3 x | 15.3 x | 14.3 x | 14.7 x | 14.8 x | 14.7 x | 14.4 x | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.13 | 0.30 | −0.18 | |
| Dose effect, p < 0.00; Time effect, p = 0.07; Interaction, p = 0.77 | |||||||||||||
| T-Caro 6 | Cont | 3.1 z | 2.9 z | 3.0 y | 3.0 y | 3.1 z | 3.1 z | 2.8 z | 0.07 | 0.98 | 0.80 | 0.64 | −0.04 |
| LS | 4.3 y | 4.0 y | 4.7 x | 4.8 x | 4.6 y | 4.2 y | 4.2 y | 0.12 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.50 | −0.09 | |
| HS | 6.6 a,x | 6.3 ab,x | 5.2 b,x | 5.3 b,x | 5.5 ab,x | 5.3 b,x | 5.3 ab,x | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 | −0.27 | |
| Dose effect, p < 0.00; Time effect, p = 0.19; Interaction, p = 0.02 | |||||||||||||
| Storage | T-Caro 2 | YCFS 3 | L* 4 | a* 4 | b* 4 | a/b 4 | ApH 5 | YpH 6 | HUs | YI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp | Period | DSM | ZEN-NHO | |||||||||
| -- | 0 | 6.57 a | 15.3 | 15.5 ab | 52.1 | 26.3 | 41.0 | 0.65 | 8.6 c | 6.0 a | 78.9 a | 0.48 a |
| 4 °C | 21 | 5.92 ab | 15.3 | 15.3 b | 50.4 | 25.1 | 42.0 | 0.61 | 9.1 b | 5.9 b | 76.6 a | 0.47 a |
| 25 °C | 21 | 5.30 b | 14.4 | 16.3 a | 50.6 | 28.2 | 43.6 | 0.67 | 9.8 a | 6.1 a | 58.2 b | 0.23 b |
| SEM | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 1.16 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 1.83 | 0.02 | |
| p-Value | 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.66 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Group 1 | Method 2 | L* 3 (r, Cl, p) 4 | a* 3 (r, CI, p) | b* 3 (r, CI, p) | a/b 3 (r, CI, p) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cont | DSM | −0.35 [−0.61, −0.02], 0.039 | 0.55 [0.26, 0.74], <0.001 | −0.01 [−0.34, 0.33], 0.961 | 0.69 [0.46, 0.83], <0.001 |
| ZEN-NHO | −0.58 [−0.77, −0.31], <0.001 | 0.56 [0.27, 0.75], <0.001 | −0.08 [−0.41, 0.26], 0.632 | 0.80 [0.64, 0.90], <0.001 | |
| LS | DSM | −0.49 [−0.65, −0.29], <0.001 | 0.44 [0.23, 0.61], <0.001 | −0.51 [−0.66, −0.31], <0.001 | 0.72 [0.59, 0.82], <0.001 |
| ZEN-NHO | −0.51 [−0.67, −0.31], <0.001 | 0.78 [0.67, 0.86], <0.001 | −0.27 [−0.47, −0.03], 0.025 | 0.88 [0.81, 0.92], <0.001 | |
| HS | DSM | −0.46 [−0.62, −0.25], <0.001 | 0.47 [0.26, 0.63], <0.001 | −0.55 [−0.70, −0.37], <0.001 | 0.60 [0.42, 0.73], <0.001 |
| ZEN-NHO | −0.77 [−0.85, −0.66], <0.001 | 0.86 [0.78, 0.91], <0.001 | −0.46 [−0.62, −0.24], <0.001 | 0.85 [0.77, 0.90], <0.001 | |
| Pooled | DSM | −0.72 [−0.78, −0.63], <0.001 | 0.85 [0.80, 0.89], <0.001 | −0.55 [−0.65, −0.44], <0.001 | 0.88 [0.85, 0.91], <0.001 |
| ZEN-NHO | −0.73 [−0.80, −0.66], <0.001 | 0.91 [0.88, 0.93], <0.001 | −0.48 [−0.59, −0.36], <0.001 | 0.90 [0.87, 0.93], <0.001 |
| T-Cho | HDL-C | TG | non-HDL | HDL/T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diet 2 | mg/dL | mg/dL | mg/dL | mg/dL | Ratio |
| Cont | 108.9 | 47.2 b | 1374.9 a | 61.7 | 0.47 |
| LS | 113.2 | 52.8 b | 1169.7 a | 60.4 | 0.50 |
| HS | 136.9 | 76.5 a | 192.9 b | 60.4 | 0.58 |
| SEM | 6.4 | 3.6 | 133.3 | 5.5 | 0.02 |
| ANOVA 3 | 0.16 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1.00 | 0.16 |
| Linear | 0.06 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.94 | 0.06 |
| Quadratic | 0.16 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 1.00 | 0.16 |
| r 4 | 0.27 | 0.49 | −0.54 | −0.01 | 0.27 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kojima, S. Silky Fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus) Dietary Supplementation with Dried Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum): Effects on Egg Quality, Blood Biochemical Parameters, and Egg Storage Stability. Poultry 2026, 5, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry5010015
Kojima S. Silky Fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus) Dietary Supplementation with Dried Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum): Effects on Egg Quality, Blood Biochemical Parameters, and Egg Storage Stability. Poultry. 2026; 5(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry5010015
Chicago/Turabian StyleKojima, Sadao. 2026. "Silky Fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus) Dietary Supplementation with Dried Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum): Effects on Egg Quality, Blood Biochemical Parameters, and Egg Storage Stability" Poultry 5, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry5010015
APA StyleKojima, S. (2026). Silky Fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus) Dietary Supplementation with Dried Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum): Effects on Egg Quality, Blood Biochemical Parameters, and Egg Storage Stability. Poultry, 5(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry5010015

