Next Article in Journal
Supply Organ Development in Young Broilers in Response to Changing Dietary Fat and Amino Acids in the Starter Period
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Dietary Non-Essential Amino Acids to Lysine Ratio on Egg Performance and Body Composition of Brown-Egg Layers from 20 to 35 Weeks of Age
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Functional Effects of Single-Stage vs. Multi-Stage Incubation Systems and Parental Flock Age on Embryonic Development, Oxidative Stress, and Performance of Male Broiler Chickens

by
Geise Linzmeier
1,
Fernando de C. Tavernari
2,
Aline Zampar
1,
João V. Strapazzon
1,
Paulo V. Oliveira
1,
Roger Wagner
3,
Aleksandro S. da Silva
1 and
Marcel M. Boiago
1,*
1
Postgraduation Program in Animal Science, University of Santa Catarina State (UDESC/CEO), Chapecó 89815-630, SC, Brazil
2
Núcleo Temático de Produção de Aves, Embrapa Suínos e Aves, Concórdia 89715-899, SC, Brazil
3
Department of Food Sciences, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria 97105-900, RS, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Poultry 2025, 4(4), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4040055
Submission received: 11 September 2025 / Revised: 29 October 2025 / Accepted: 7 November 2025 / Published: 13 November 2025

Abstract

It is well established that both the age of the breeder hen and the type of incubator can influence the efficiency of the hatching process. However, there is a lack of information in the literature regarding the interaction between these two factors. This study evaluated the effects of incubator type (multi-stage vs. single-stage) and breeder hen age (35 and 61 weeks) on the hatching parameters, embryonic oxidative stress, performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of male broiler chickens. The embryo livers from the multi-stage incubator presented significantly higher NADP oxidase (NOX) values (p = 0.022), indicating elevated oxidative stress. A significant interaction between breeder age and incubator type was observed for the thiol concentrations, with embryos from older hens incubated in the multi-stage system showing higher thiol levels compared to those from the single-stage system. Birds from these older breeders demonstrated increased breast yield, feed intake, and weight gain, without significant changes in feed conversion ratio. Additionally, the single-stage incubator was associated with reduced embryonic oxidative stress, lower egg weight loss during incubation, and improved early performance of chicks during the first week post-hatch. In conclusion, beyond the previously recognized benefits of single-stage incubation systems, our findings highlight their potential to mitigate oxidative stress in embryos, thereby enhancing early chick development.

1. Introduction

Poultry production is one of the agribusiness sectors that has achieved continuous growth since it was conceived, making birds increasingly productive and specialized for their purpose [1]. In this scenario, Brazil stands out as the third-largest producer of chicken meat worldwide and the largest exporter of this commodity [2]. With an increasingly competitive market, the search for success in breeding these animals has mainly focused on the sanity, environment, and nutrition of birds, often disregarding problems arising from the breeder hens or egg hatching. The short life of the broiler can justify this, usually slaughtered with 42 days, where genetics, air quality, and nutrition would have a greater observable impact. Despite this, there is a consensus that breeder hens of different ages influence the weight and quality of chicks [3,4,5], such as large egg embryos, which have a better development due to the greater amount of nutrients available [3,6].
Hatcheries play a crucial role in the production of one-day-old chicks, utilizing two types of commercial incubators. In the multi-stage (MS) system, eggs are added continuously, resulting in the presence of embryos at various developmental stages [7]. When incubated in MS machines, thermal energy generated by older embryos is transferred to younger ones, leading to an excessive rise in internal setter temperature. This uncontrolled thermal interaction can result in suboptimal incubation conditions and increased embryonic mortality [8].
On the other hand, according to [9], the single-stage (SS) machines are fully loaded with a single egg lot, thus allowing better control of temperature, humidity, and ventilation. As a result, all embryos are at the same developmental stage, which enables precise control of incubation parameters, tailored to the specific physiological needs of the embryos throughout the incubation process.
The success of the poultry production chain, which include hatcheries and breeder hens, can be seen through increased egg hatching, chick viability [9], the weight of animals, and good navel healing [10]. Few studies have addressed the age of the breeder hens and incubator type, although the age of the breeder hen is known to affect several variables related to the hatching and the quality of the chick, especially concerning variables related to the oxidative stress of the embryos and their consequences on performance and meat quality.
Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of the type of incubator (multi-stage and single-stage) and the age of the breeder hen (35 and 61 weeks) on variables related to the hatching yield, embryo oxidative stress, performance, carcass and cut yields, and meat quality of male broilers raised up to 42 days of age.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in Chapecó, state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. The first phase, involving egg incubation, took place in a commercial hatchery where eggs from breeder hens aged 35 and 61 weeks—belonging to the agro-industrial cooperative Cooperativa Central Aurora Alimentos (Chapecó, Santa Catarina, Brazil)—were incubated. The second phase was carried out at the experimental poultry house of the Experimental Farm of the Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC). Following the rearing period, the birds were slaughtered in a commercial processing plant, and laboratory analyses were performed at the Laboratory of Animal Products Technology, Department of Animal Science, UDESC.

2.1. Experimental Design and Treatments

A completely randomized block design was adopted for the hatching trial, following a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement (2 incubator types and 2 breeder hen ages), with eight replicates consisting of trays containing 86 eggs per machine. Three machines of each incubator type were used as blocks, and no significant block effect was observed for any of the incubation variables evaluated (p > 0.05).
Fertile eggs from two Ross 308 (Aviagen) broiler breeder flocks of 35 and 61 weeks of age, with average weights of 60 ± 3.2 g and 72 ± 4.5 g, respectively, were produced on the same day and received the same care (collection, selection, and disinfection). The eggs were stored in the hatchery for four days at an average temperature of 20 °C and humidity of 75%, and then they were preheated (28 °C for 12 h) before hatching.
The single- and multi-stage incubators used were Casp (Model 125e) and Coopermaq multi-stage (Model INC 1290), respectively, with a capacity for 124,000 eggs each. The eggs were packed in trays with a capacity for 86 eggs, arranged in trolleys with 36 trays each. In the multi-stage machine, the eggs were placed weekly. The same number of eggs from each stage of incubation was placed within the setter and distributed across the incubation period.
In both incubator types, initial temperature was set at 99.3 °F and relative humidity (RH) at 58%. On day 18 of incubation (432 h), in ovo vaccination against Marek’s disease was performed. Eggs were then transferred to a hatcher (CASP®® 108 HR, Hatcher Plus Pte Ltd., Singapore), with a capacity of 19,264 eggs, set to maintain 98.6 °F temperature and 65% RH. The experiment was completed at 504 h of incubation, when hatched chicks were removed from the hatch baskets.
The experimental plots (eight trays with 86 eggs per repetition) were distributed evenly within each incubator, one in each cart, and always in the center. Percentages of infertile eggs; hatchability; hatching of fertile eggs; mortality from 0 to 4, 5 to 18, and 19 to 21 days; total embryonic mortality; and weight loss at hatching were evaluated. These percentage values were calculated in relation to the total number of eggs per tray (86 eggs), while the weight losses during hatching were calculated by the differences between the weight of the trays + eggs at the beginning and 18.5 days of hatching before their transfer to the hatchery.
For the performance evaluation, 420 one-day old male chickens from the incubation trial were distributed in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement (two incubator types and two breeder hen ages), with seven replicates consisting of 15 birds each.

2.2. Performance

The birds were housed in 2 m2 pens with reused litter (three cycles of production) and equipped with tube feeders and nipple drinkers. Water and feed were provided ad libitum. Diets were formulated based on corn and soybean meal according to the nutritional requirements and food composition established by the Brazilian Tables for Poultry and Swine [11] and prepared in a horizontal mixer with a capacity of 150 kg. Feed intake, weight gain, feed conversion, and viability were evaluated in the periods of 1 to 7, 1 to 21, 1 to 35, and 1 to 42 days of age by weighing the feed and birds at the beginning and end of each breeding phase. Flock viability (%) was calculated by dividing the final number of live birds by the initial number housed at the beginning of the trial.
To quantify carcass and cut yields, at 42 days of age, two birds per pen were randomly chosen, weighed, and taken to slaughter, with an eight-hour fast and two-hour pre-slaughter rest. At the slaughterhouse, birds were weighed again, obtaining the slaughter weight, which was used as a reference to measure carcass yields (carcass weight/slaughter weight × 100) and cuts (chest, legs, wings, back, and abdominal fat), obtained through the relation of their weights with the weight of the respective carcass.

2.3. Biochemical Variables Related to Oxidative Stress

At 18.5 days of hatching, two eggs were separated per tray and broken, and the livers of the embryos were collected after verifying their deaths through vital signs. The samples were identified, placed in a cooler, and sent refrigerated to the laboratory of Veterinary Biochemistry, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria—UFSM—to analyze the reactive oxygen species (ROS), substances responsive to the thiobarbituric acid (TBARS), protein thiol (PT), and NADP oxidase (NOX), according to the methodologies described by [12,13,14,15], respectively.

2.4. Physical Chemical Analysis of the Meat

The breasts were deboned and the pectoralis major muscles were packed in plastic bags, identified, stored in thermal boxes, and sent to the laboratory for analysis after stabilizing from rigor mortis (five hours after slaughter).
The pH was measured in triplicate, in the cranial region of the muscle, using a digital pH meter (model 205, Testo, Campinas, SP, Brazil). Meat color was determined in the inner part of the Pectoralis major muscle, using a Minolta Chroma Meter model CR-400, which determined the parameters of lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*).
Water-holding capacity (%) was determined using a sample of 2 g (±0.15) of meat from the Pectoralis major. These samples were placed between two filter papers and acrylic plates and received a pressure exerted by weight of 10.0 kg for five minutes. After this period, the samples were weighed once again to determine the water retention capacity, as described by [16].
Cooking loss was evaluated using the methodology proposed by [17], where breast meat samples were packed in plastic bags with initial weight identified and taken to a water bath for 30 min at 85 °C. At the end of this period, the samples were taken from the plastic bags for cooling and water disposal and weighed again for comparison, thus determining the percentage of cooking losses.
The shear force was measured using the same samples that underwent cooking loss, reduced in size with known measurements, and accommodated with the muscle fibers oriented perpendicularly to the WarnerBratzler blade coupled to the Texture Analyser TA-XT2i Texturometer, which measured the shear force, expressed in kgf/cm2 [18].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All variables were tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. For animal mortality, which did not follow a normal distribution, the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was applied (p < 0.05). Subsequently, the data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) through the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure in SAS software (Statistical Analysis System, version 9.0). When significant effects were detected, the means of the factorial treatment (2 × 2) were compared using the Fisher–Snedecor test (α = 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Fertility, Hatching, and Biochemical Parameters

The eggs produced by the older breeder hens showed significantly higher percentages of infertile and embryonic mortalities from 5 to 18 and 19 to 21 days and for total mortality and weight loss in hatching. The rates of hatchability and hatching of fertile eggs were higher (p < 0.001) in the eggs of young breeder hens (Table 1).
There was a significant effect of the type of incubator (TI) with lower values for multi-stage in the analysis of embryonic mortality from 5 to 18 days and greater weight loss in hatching for the same incubator (p < 0.001).
There was a significant interaction between the factors breeder age (BA) and type of incubator (TI) for the variable mortality from 0 to 4 days of hatching, observing higher mortality for the embryos of the 61-week breeder hens only in the single-stage incubator. There was also a significant effect of the type of incubator (p < 0.0001), with higher mortality of the embryos of older birds hatched in the single-stage machine (Table 2).
There was no effect of the age of the breeder hen on the biochemical variables evaluated (p > 0.05). However, there was a higher NOX value (p = 0.022) in the samples of embryo livers from the multi-stage incubator (Table 3).
There was a significant interaction between the BA and TI factors for the thiols variable (Table 4), where embryos from older hens in the multi-stage incubator presented higher values compared to single-stage ones.

3.2. Performance

Birds from breeder hens of 61 weeks of age showed significantly higher initial weight, feed intake, and weight gain values in all breeding stages (Table 5). The age of the breeder hen did not influence feed conversion (p > 0.05) in any of the periods evaluated. Feed intake and weight gain were lower in multi-stage incubators only from 1 to 7 days.
Higher breast yield (p = 0.013) and a tendency for lower leg yield (p = 0.054) were observed in the carcasses of birds from the 61-week breeder hens (Table 6). The other cuts were not influenced. The type of incubator did not significantly affect the yield of carcass and cuts.
The age of the breeder hen did not significantly affect the evaluated meat quality parameters (Table 7). On the other hand, the type of incubator influenced (p < 0.0001) the variable water retention capacity, with a higher value found in the meat of the birds hatched in a multi-stage machine.

4. Discussion

The higher fertility rate observed in eggs from 35-week-old breeder hens is related to the fact that males are practically at the beginning of their reproductive life. There is a higher cover index and sperm quality during this phase [19]. The company’s farms that supplied the eggs use the so-called “spiking” for males and “intra-spiking” management in batches of older breeder hens to minimize this drop in fertility. However, the results show that the drop in fertility is still significant in older birds. Therefore, it can be said that the hatchability and the hatching of fertile eggs tend to be higher in the eggs of young birds if there are higher fertility rates, if no deviations occur during the hatching process, as was observed in the present study.
Embryonic mortalities at different hatching ages and weight loss at hatching were lower in young breeder hens due to the better internal and external quality of the eggs since the quality of the albumen, yolk, and shell change with the age of the hen and influence mortality [20]. The volume of albumen decreases with the advancement of the productive period, even with the increase in the size of the egg. Therefore, its functions of supplying water, minerals, and amino acids are compromised, affecting the contribution necessary for the embryo [21]. On the other hand, the yolk increases its volume due to the smaller interval between ovulations [22]. The shell tends to increase in area but not in number of pores, which allows a large loss of water by the embryo despite improving the oxygen supply [23], favoring egg weight loss during hatching [24,25].
Weight loss related to the multi-stage incubator was observed; in addition to this, weight loss was also associated with the age of the breeder hen. This is due to the moisture imbalance in the openings, the egg tray exchange, and the consequent heat generation of the metabolism of different ages within the same space [26]. Therefore, the incubator has lower levels in these openings in which the humidity is controlled when receiving the external air from the hatching room, where a temperature exchange and low relative humidity inside the incubator occurs.
The observed result of the interaction between type of incubator and age of the breeder hen, where older hens had higher mortality in the single-stage system, contradicts the work conducted by [27], who demonstrated the need for this type of incubator for eggs that have larger pores and therefore have more chances of dehydration. However, this research showed no evidence to support the result found in the interaction between the age of the breeder and the type of incubator.
The higher concentration of NOX observed in samples from multi-stage incubators may be related to the higher temperature oscillation within this equipment, generating thermal stress in embryos [28]. This increase in temperature generates positive feedback for the increase in blood insulin, a physiological response to reduce heat production that previously used lipid molecules to maintain body temperature and now transports glucose to be oxidized in the bloodstream [29]. Furthermore, the increase in NOX may also be linked to the release of inflammatory cytokines due to the caloric stress they undergo during hatching [30], apoptosis of immune cells, and the lower activity of natural immune system killer (NK) cells [31]. Embryos from older hens incubated in multi-stage systems showed increased protein thiol levels (Table 4), suggesting a more effective antioxidant response to the elevated NADPH oxidase (NOX) activity observed in these embryos.
The higher values observed for FI and WG of birds from older breeder hens are explained by the fact that older hens produce larger eggs and, consequently, heavier birds at slaughter. However, it is important to note that the FC was not altered, as was also observed by [32]. According to [3], as the age of the hen increases, feed intake and weight gain of the broilers also increase.
In this study, birds from older breeder hens did not show higher initial mortality. According to [33], this is related to the better initial performance of animals in weight gain, feed intake, and food conversion.
Higher FI and WG were observed during the first seven days of hatching in the single-stage machine. This is due to the biosecurity provided by this type of equipment, which has a lower contamination index and allows the animal to have an adequate development [34], including obtaining higher rates of navel healing and leg quality [32]. These characteristics are essential for chickens housed in reused beds, as is the case of the present study, in addition to factors such as better temperature distribution and humidity control, which can cause stress to the embryo and impair the initial performance of animals. This difference in performance occurred only in the first days of breeding since the birds hatched in multi-stage incubators develop immunity and acquire resistance to microorganisms. Therefore, no significant differences in FI and WG occur after this initial period.
The birds from the older breeder hens had higher breast yield and greater weight gain. Heavier slaughtered birds have more meat deposited in the carcass. However, there is usually no increase in the percentage of cut yield, as observed in the reports of [35].
The meat of the birds hatched in a single-stage incubator showed lower water retention capacity; that is, they lost more liquid as a result of the pressure received. This result is contrary to expectations since these birds theoretically had less oxidative stress during hatching. According to [36], oxidation or oxidative stress decreases water solubility and binding capacity, especially when it affects proteins, thus promoting a greater loss of water in the meat.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the interaction between breeder age and incubator type significantly influences embryonic development. Embryos from older hens showed higher mortality between 0 and 4 days of incubation, but only when incubated in single-stage systems. In contrast, embryos from older breeders incubated in multi-stage systems exhibited increased protein thiol levels, suggesting a more effective antioxidant response to the elevated NADPH oxidase (NOX) activity observed in these embryos.
When analyzed independently, single-stage incubators were associated with lower NOX activity in embryos, reduced egg weight loss during incubation, and improved chick performance during the first week of life. Although breeder age negatively affected fertility and general incubation parameters, chicks from older hens demonstrated superior post-hatch performance and higher breast yield, indicating potential compensatory advantages in later developmental stages.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.B. and G.L.; methodology, M.M.B. and F.d.C.T.; formal analysis, M.M.B., A.Z. and A.Z.; investigation, G.L., J.V.S., P.V.O. and M.M.B.; resources, M.M.B.; data curation, M.M.B., R.W. and A.S.d.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.B. and G.L.; writing—review and editing, M.M.B.; supervision, M.M.B. and G.L.; project administration, M.M.B.; funding acquisition, M.M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank the Foundation for Research and Innovation of the State of Santa Catarina (FAPESC—Number TO 2023 TR535) for its continuous financial support of our research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use from the University of Santa Catarina State (No 4196120820, approved on 25 September 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BABreeder age
ITIncubator type
TBARSThiobarbituric acid-reactive substances
SSSingle-stage
MSMulti-stage
ROSReactive oxygen species
TPProtein thiols
NOXNADP oxidase

References

  1. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Gateway to Poultry Production and Products. Available online: http://www.fao.org/poultry-production-products/production/en/ (accessed on 20 June 2024).
  2. ABPA (Associação Brasileira de Proteína Animal) Annual Report. 2023. Available online: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=abpa+relat%C3%B3rio+anual+2023 (accessed on 5 March 2024).
  3. Csitári, G.; Such, N.; Menyhárt, L.; Schermann, K.; Humpok, K.; Farkas, V.; Pál, L.; Dublecz, K. Effects of litter exposure and flock age of broiler breeders on hatchability and the microbial composition of eggshells, egg membranes, and egg contents. Front. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 1589607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alo, E.T.; Daramola, J.O.; Wheto, M.; Oke, O.E. Impact of broiler breeder hens’ age and egg storage on egg quality, embryonic development, and hatching traits of FUNAAB-alpha chickens. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103, 103313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Uyanga, V.A.; Onagbesan, O.M.; Oke, O.E.; Abiona, J.A.; Egbeyale, L.T. Influence of age of broiler breeders and storage duration on egg quality and blastoderm of Marshall broiler breeders. J. Ap. Poult. Res. 2020, 29, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nxumalo, S.H.; Okoro, V.M.O.; Mbajiorgu, C.A. Optimum broiler breeders’ age for production performance, internal egg characteristics and 7 day mortality of chicks. Asian J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 16, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baracho, M.S.; Naas, I.A.; Gigli, A.C.S. Impacto das variáveis ambientais em incubatório de estágio múltiplo de frangos de corte. Eng. Agrícola 2010, 30, 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Molenaar, R.I.; Reijrink, I.A.M.I.; Meijerhof, R.I.I.; Van den Brand, H. Meeting embryonic requirements of broilers throughout hatching: A review. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2010, 12, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yassin, H.; Velthuis, A.G.J.; Boerjan, M.; Van Riel, J.; Huirne, R.B.M. Field study on broiler eggs hatchability. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 2408–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ulmer-Franco, A.M.; Fasenko, G.M.; Christopher, E.E.O.D. Hatching egg characteristics, chick quality, and broiler performance at 2 breeder flock ages and from 3 egg weights. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 2735–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rostagno, H.S.; Albino, L.F.T.; Donzele, J.L.; Oliveira, R.F.; Lopes, D.C.; Ferreira, A.S.; Barreto, S.L.T. Tabelas Brasileiras para Aves e Suínos, 2nd ed.; Editora da Universidade Federal de Viçosa (EdUFV): Viçosa, Brazil, 2011.
  12. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoyland, D.V.; Taylor, A.J. A review of the methodology of the 2-Thiobarbituric Acid Test. Food Chem. 1990, 40, 271–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ellman, G.L. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1959, 82, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Miranda, K.M.; Espey, M.G.; Wink, D.A.A. A rapid, simple spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem. 2001, 5, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hamm, R. Biochemistry of Meat Hydration. Adv. Food Res. 1961, 10, 355–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Honikel, K.O. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 1998, 49, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lyon, C.E.; Lyon, B.G.; Dickens, J.A. Effects of carcass stimulation, deboning time, and marination on color and texture of broiler breast meat. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 1998, 7, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jabbar, A.; Ditta, Y.A. Effect of Broiler Breeders Age on Hatchability, Candling, Water Loss, Chick Yield and Dead in Shell. World Vet. J. 2017, 7, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Peebles, E.D.; Doyle, S.M.; Zumwalt, C.D.; Gerard, P.D.; Latour, M.A.; Boyle, C.R.; Smith, T.W. Breeder age influences embryogenesis in broiler hatching eggs. Poult. Sci. 2001, 80, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Davis, C.; Reeves, R. High Value Opportunities from the Chicken Egg: A Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, 1st ed.; RIRDC: Canberra, Australia, 2002.
  22. Lara, L.J.C.; Baião, N.C.; Cançado, S.V.; Teixeira, J.L.; López, C.A.; Duarte, F.D.; Michalsky, V.B. Effect of chick weight on performance and carcass yield of broilers. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2005, 57, 799–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  23. Rocha, J.S.R.; Lara, L.J.C.; Baião, N.C.; Cançado, M.V.; Triginelli, S.V.; Leite, J.F.C. Effect of egg classification prior to setting on broiler chicken uniformity, performance and meat yields. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2008, 60, 1181–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alsobayel, A.A.; Almarshade, M.A.; Albadry, M.A. Effect of breed, age and storage period on egg weight, egg weight loss and chick weight of commercial broiler breeders raised in Saudi Arabia. J. Saudi Soc. Ag. Sci. 2013, 12, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Grochowska, E.; Kinal, A.; Sobek, Z.; Siatkowski, I.; Bednarczyk, M. Field study on the factors affecting egg weight loss, early embryonic mortality, hatchability, and chick mortality with the use of classification tree technique. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 3626–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mesquita, M.A.; Araújo, I.C.S.; Café, M.B.; Arnhold, E.; Mascarenhas, A.G.; Carvalho, F.B.; Stringhini, J.H.; Leandro, N.S.M.; Gonzales, E. Results of hatching and rearing broiler chickens in different hatching systems. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Araújo, I.C.S.; Leandro, N.S.M.; Mesquina, M.A.; Café, M.B.; Gonzales, E. Effect of incubator type and broiler breeder age on hatchability and chick quality. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2016, 18, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lourens, A.; Van Den Brand, H.; Heetkamp, M.J.W.; Meijerhof, R.; Kemp, B. Effects of eggshell temperature and oxygen concentration on embryo growth and metabolism during incubation. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 2194–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Belhadj Slimen, I.; Najar, T.; Ghram, A.; Abdrrabba, M. Heat stress effects on livestock: Molecular, cellular and metabolic aspects, a review. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2016, 100, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nawab, A.; Li, G.; Na, L.; Wu, J.; Chao, L.; Xiao, M.; Zhao, Y.; Birmani, M.W.; Ghani, M.W. Effect of curcumin supplementation on TLR4 mediated non-specific immune responses in liver of laying hens under high-temperature conditions. J. Therm. Biol. 2019, 84, 384–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, Y.; Bazhin, A.V.; Werner, J.; Karakhanova, S. Reactive oxygen species in the immune system. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 32, 249–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Damaziak, K.; Paweska, M.; Gozdowski, D.; Niemiec, J. Short periods of hatching, egg turning during storage and broiler breeder hens age for early development of embryos, hatching results, chicks quality and juvenile growth. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 3264–3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Machado, J.P.; Mesquita, M.A.; Café, M.B.; Assis, S.D.; Veríssimo, S.; Santos, R.R.; Leandro, N.S.M.; Araújo, I.C.S. Effects of breeder age on embryonic development, hatching results, chick quality, and growing performance of the slow-growing genotype. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 6697–6704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ali, M.A.; Iji, P.A.; Macalpine, R.; Mikkelsen, L.L. The effect of litter material on productivity and health of broiler chickens. Aust. Poult. Sci. Symp. 2009, 77–80. Available online: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20103078862 (accessed on 10 September 2025).
  35. Karaoglu, M.; Aksu, M.I.; Esenbuga, N.; Kaya, A.; Macit, M. Carcass and commercial cuts yield in broilers of different ages fed diets supplemented with probiotics. Afr. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 5, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zaboli, G.; Huang, X.; Feng, X.; Ahn, D.U. How can heat stress affect chicken meat quality?—A review. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 1551–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Incubation parameters (%) of eggs from breeders of different ages and hatched in single-stage (SS) and multi-stage (MS) machines.
Table 1. Incubation parameters (%) of eggs from breeders of different ages and hatched in single-stage (SS) and multi-stage (MS) machines.
Breeder Age
(Weeks—BA)
Incubator Type
(IT)
p BA x ITCV (%)
3561pSSMSp
IE1.38 13.02 **7.866.320.2110.13246.25
HAT93.75 79.34 **85.2287.870.0750.0804.24
HFE94.85 90.73 *91.8593.730.0780.1883.10
M42.63 5.30 **4.923.02 ***36.25
M5-180.67 1.69 0.0111.710.65 **0.96047.10
M19-211.10 3.17 0.0142.112.170.900.32554.67
TEM.5.14 9.26 **8.146.260.0710.46838.09
HWL12.09 13.57 *11.9613.70 *0.1292.72
* p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; CV = coefficient of variation. IE: infertile eggs; HAT: hatchability; HFE: hatching of fertile eggs; M4: mortality from 0 to 4 days; M5-18: mortality from 5 to 18 days; M19-21: mortality from 19 to 21 days; TEM: total embryonic mortality; HWL: hatching weight loss.
Table 2. The interaction between the factors breeder age (BA) and incubator type (IT) for the variable percentage of mortality from 0 to 4 days of hatching.
Table 2. The interaction between the factors breeder age (BA) and incubator type (IT) for the variable percentage of mortality from 0 to 4 days of hatching.
Breeder Age (Weeks)
Incubator3561
Single-Stage2.24 7.60 p < 0.001
Multi-Stage3.033.02 p = 1.00
p = 0.680p < 0.001
Rows: Mean values for each incubator type in the different breeder hen ages. Columns: Mean values for each breeder age, considering both incubator types.
Table 3. Hepatic biochemical variables of embryos from breeder hens of different ages and hatched in single-stage (SS) and multi-stage (MS) machines.
Table 3. Hepatic biochemical variables of embryos from breeder hens of different ages and hatched in single-stage (SS) and multi-stage (MS) machines.
Breeder Age
(Weeks—BA)
Incubator Type
(IT)
p BA x ITCV (%)
3561pSSMSp
ROS18,11714,6110.11217,56015,1680.2560.08135.10
TBARS51.2541.860.08847.5145.600.6900.14231.00
TP0.0540.0530.7500.049 0.058 0.0380.03422.0
NOX7.236.810.5206.20 7.85 0.0150.19025.98
CV = coefficient of variation. ROS: reactive oxygen species (U DCFH/mg protein); TBARS: thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (ƞmol MDA/mg protein); PT: protein thiols (mmol SH/mg protein); NOX: NADP oxidase (µmol NOX/mg protein).
Table 4. The interaction between the factors breeder age (BA) and incubator type (IT) for the biochemical variable protein thiols (mmol SH/mg protein).
Table 4. The interaction between the factors breeder age (BA) and incubator type (IT) for the biochemical variable protein thiols (mmol SH/mg protein).
Breeder Age (Weeks)
Incubator3561
Single-Stage0.0550.044 p = 0.31
Multi-Stage0.0540.062 p = 0.49
p = 0.99p = 0.028
Rows: Mean values for each incubator type in the different breeder hen ages. Columns: Mean values for each breeder age, considering both incubator types.
Table 5. Performance variables of broiler chickens from breeders of different ages and hatched in single-stage (SS) and multi-stage (MS) machines in the different breeding periods evaluated.
Table 5. Performance variables of broiler chickens from breeders of different ages and hatched in single-stage (SS) and multi-stage (MS) machines in the different breeding periods evaluated.
Breeder Age
(Weeks—BA)
Incubator Type
(IT)
p BA x ITCV (%)
3561pSSMSp
1 to 7 d.
IW0.0420.050*0.0460.0460.9410.1611.95
FI0.1670.1780.0560.1810.169**0.4238.65
WG0.1430.156*0.1550.143*0.7035.52
FC1.171.140.141.171.180.1410.2317.14
FV100100---100100---------
1 to 21 d.
FI1.222 1.300 **1.4691.1770.5870.4174.14
WG0.978 1.057 *0.9850.9570.0770.1813.80
FC1.2501.2300.1241.2401.2300.750. 3112.74
FV98.3397.770.67298.8897.220.2110.6713.22
1 to 35 d.
FI3.560 3.734 **3.6453.6490.9790.3843.77
WG2.552 2.704 **2.6242.6310.8690.2364.03
FC1.3951.3810.2911.3891.3870.8630.4772.07
FV96.6697.220.76497.2296.660.7610.1404.57
1 to 42 d.
FI5.029 5.237 **5.1415.1210.7210.8573.83
WG3.311 3.464 **3.4143.3600.3290.8633.94
FC1.5191.5120.6411.5061.5240.2690.5822.20
FV96.1196.110.99996.1196.111.000.9995.73
* p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; CV = coefficient of variation. IW: initial weight (kg); FI: feed intake (Kg); WG: weight gain (kg); FC: feed conversion (kg/Kg); FV: flock viability (%).
Table 6. Carcass and cuts yields (%) and abdominal fat (A.F.) of birds from breeder hens of different ages and hatched in single-stage (SS) and multi-stage (MS) machines.
Table 6. Carcass and cuts yields (%) and abdominal fat (A.F.) of birds from breeder hens of different ages and hatched in single-stage (SS) and multi-stage (MS) machines.
Breeder Age
(Weeks—BA)
Incubator Type
(IT)
p BA x ITCV (%)
3561pSSMSp
Carcass75.4276.190.14875.8875.720.7590.4281.64
Breast40.3042.10 0.01341.2841.110.7920.2763.93
Leg30.1828.770.05429.3029.650.4420.7433.76
Wings10.269.940.36010.1810.010.6110.5298.12
Back18.3017.880.44917.8918.280.4790.4327.34
A. F. 1.070.840.1410.910.990.5790.65437.79
CV = coefficient of variation.
Table 7. Meat quality related-variables of broiler chickens from breeder hens of different ages and hatched in single-stage (SS) and multi-stage (MS) machines.
Table 7. Meat quality related-variables of broiler chickens from breeder hens of different ages and hatched in single-stage (SS) and multi-stage (MS) machines.
Breeder Age
(Weeks—BA)
Incubator Type
(IT)
p BA x ITCV (%)
3561pSSMSp
pH5.685.710.4415.695.700.9410.1591.91
L54.1454.260.86654.3854.020.5860.7443.01
a *−0.64−0.930.503−0.79−0.770.5330.78173.04
b *9.869.500.5939.2710.090.2380.24116.97
WHC70.6970.880.83369.4372.14**0.8213.07
CL17.5115.780.40817.0516.240.6950.38230.08
SF2.0812.1740.6832.0252.2340.3650.60726.81
** p < 0.01; CV = coefficient of variation. L: lightness; a *: redness; b *: yellowness; WHC: water-holding capacity (%); CL: cooking losses (%); SF: shear force (kgf/cm2).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Linzmeier, G.; Tavernari, F.d.C.; Zampar, A.; Strapazzon, J.V.; Oliveira, P.V.; Wagner, R.; da Silva, A.S.; Boiago, M.M. Functional Effects of Single-Stage vs. Multi-Stage Incubation Systems and Parental Flock Age on Embryonic Development, Oxidative Stress, and Performance of Male Broiler Chickens. Poultry 2025, 4, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4040055

AMA Style

Linzmeier G, Tavernari FdC, Zampar A, Strapazzon JV, Oliveira PV, Wagner R, da Silva AS, Boiago MM. Functional Effects of Single-Stage vs. Multi-Stage Incubation Systems and Parental Flock Age on Embryonic Development, Oxidative Stress, and Performance of Male Broiler Chickens. Poultry. 2025; 4(4):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4040055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Linzmeier, Geise, Fernando de C. Tavernari, Aline Zampar, João V. Strapazzon, Paulo V. Oliveira, Roger Wagner, Aleksandro S. da Silva, and Marcel M. Boiago. 2025. "Functional Effects of Single-Stage vs. Multi-Stage Incubation Systems and Parental Flock Age on Embryonic Development, Oxidative Stress, and Performance of Male Broiler Chickens" Poultry 4, no. 4: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4040055

APA Style

Linzmeier, G., Tavernari, F. d. C., Zampar, A., Strapazzon, J. V., Oliveira, P. V., Wagner, R., da Silva, A. S., & Boiago, M. M. (2025). Functional Effects of Single-Stage vs. Multi-Stage Incubation Systems and Parental Flock Age on Embryonic Development, Oxidative Stress, and Performance of Male Broiler Chickens. Poultry, 4(4), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4040055

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop