Improvement in the Coloration and Quality of Japanese Quail Eggs Through Supplementation with Natural Pigments
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Performance
2.2. Carotenoid Content
2.3. Egg Quality
2.4. Egg Storage
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Silva, M.C.S.; Lucena, L.R.R.; Holanda, M.A.C. Percentual de postura de codornas europeias alimentadas com diferentes níveis de lisina utilizando regressão beta. Arch. Zootec. 2019, 68, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalle Zotte, A.; Singh, Y.; Michiels, J.; Cullere, M. Black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) as dietary source for laying quails: Live performance, and egg physico-chemical quality, sensory profile and storage stability. Animals 2019, 9, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filik, G.; Filik, A.G.; Altop, A. The effects of dietary hot pepper (Capsicum annuum) waste powder supplementation on egg production traits of Japanese quail layers. Ciênc. Rural. 2020, 50, e20190945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fassani, E.J.; Abreu, M.T.; Silveira, M.M.B.M. Coloração de gema de ovo de poedeiras comerciais recebendo pigmentante comercial na ração. Ciênc. Anim. Brasil. 2019, 20, e-50231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, H.C.; Oliveira, M.C.; Arantes, U.M.; Argyri, E.T.A. Paprika and/or marigold extracts improve productivity and yolk color in egg-laying quails. Ciênc. Anim. Brasil. 2020, 21, e-53048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleh, A.A.; Gawish, E.; Mahmoud, S.F.; Amber, K.; Awad, W.; Alzawqari, M.H.; Abdel-Moneim, A.M.E. Effect of natural and chemical colorant supplementation on performance, egg-quality characteristics, yolk fatty-acid profile, and blood constituents in laying hens. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matache, C.C.; Cornescu, G.M.; Drăgotoiu, D.; Cișmileanu, A.E.; Untea, A.E.; Sărăcilă, M.; Panaite, T.D. Effects of marigold and paprika extracts as natural pigments on laying hen productive performances, egg quality and oxidative stability. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maisto, M.; Iannuzzo, F.; Schiano, E.; Ciampaglia, R.; Labanca, A.; Montesano, D.; Tenore, G.C. Effects of fortified laying hen diet with moringa oleifera leaves and goji berries on cholesterol and carotenoid egg content. Foods 2022, 11, 3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, A.B.; Fávaro-Trindade, C.S.; Grosso, C.R.F. Preparo e caracterização de microcápsulas de oleoresina de páprica obtidas por atomização. Food. Sci. Technol. 2005, 25, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miranda, D.A.; Valentim, J.K.; Oliveira, H.F.D.; Chaves, C.A.R.; Geraldo, A.; Machado, L.C.; Mendes, J.P.; Almeida, A.A.D. Coloration of egg yolks of laying hens fed sorghum-based diets with the addition of natural and synthetic pigments. Rev. Ciênc. Agroveterin. 2021, 20, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, J.G.L.; Pinto, F.G.S.; Toledo, A.G.; Alves, L.F.A.; Alves, D.S. Biological activities and phytochemical screening of leaf extracts from Zanthoxylum caribaeum L. (rutaceae). Biosci. J. 2020, 36, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moura, A.M.A.; Melo, T.V.; Miranda, D.J.A. Synthetic pigments for Japanese quail fed diets with sorghum. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2016, 68, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rostagno, H.S.; Albino, L.F.T.; Hannas, M.I.; Donzele, J.L.; Sakomura, N.K.; Gomes, P.C.; Oliveira, R.F.; Lopes, D.C.; Ferreira, A.S.; Barreto, S.L.T. Tabelas Brasileiras Para Aves e Suínos: Composição de Alimentos e Exigências Nutricionais, 4th ed.; Departamento de Zootecnia UFC: Fortaleza, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Amaya, D.B. Quantitative analysis, in vitro assessment of bioavailability and antioxidant activity of food carotenoids—A review. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2010, 23, 726–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alleoni, A.C.C.; Antunes, A.J. Unidade Haugh como medida da qualidade de ovos de galinha armazenados sob refrigeração. Sci. Agric. 2001, 58, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® 9.4 User’s Guide; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Moeini, M.M.; Ghazi, S.H.; Sadeghi, S.; Malekizadeh, M. The effect of red pepper (Capsicum annuum) and marigold flower (Tagetes erecta) powder on egg production, egg yolk color, and some blood metabolites of laying hens. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2013, 3, 301–305. [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira, M.C.; Silva, W.D.; Oliveira, H.C.; Moreira, E.Q.B.; Ferreira, L.O.; Gomes, Y.S.; Souza Junior, M.A.P. Paprika and/or marigold extracts in diets for laying hens. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. Anim. 2017, 18, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feddern, V.; Prá, M.C.; Mores, R.; Nicoloso, R.S.; Coldebella, A.; Abreu, P.G. Egg quality assessment at different storage conditions, seasons and laying hen strains. Ciência E Agrotechnol. 2017, 41, 322–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figueiredo, T.C.; Cançado, S.V.; Viegas, R.P.; Rêgo, I.O.P.; Lara, L.J.C.; Souza, M.R.; Baião, N.C. Qualidade de ovos comerciais submetidos a diferentes condições de armazenamento. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2011, 63, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klassing, K.C. Comparative Avian Nutrition New York; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Nys, Y. Dietary carotenoids and egg yolk coloration. Arch. Geflugelkd. 2000, 64, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
- Hencken, H. 1992: Chemical and physiological behavior of feed carotenoids and their4 effects on pigmentation. Poult. Sci. 1992, 71, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos-Bocanegra, E.; Ospina-Osorio, X.; Oviedo-Rondón, E.O. Evaluation of Xanthophylls Extracted from Tagetes erectus (Marigold Flower) and Capsicum sp. (Red Pepper Paprika) as a Pigment for Egg-yolks Compare with Synthetic Pigments. Inter. J. Poult. Sci. 2004, 11, 685–689. [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton, P.B.; Tirado, F.J.; Garcia-Fernandez, F. Deposition in egg yolk25 of the carotenoids from saponified and unsaponified oleoresin of red peper (Capsicum26 annuum) fed to laying hens. Poult. Sci. 1990, 69, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huyghebaert, G. The Utilisation of Oxy-Carotenoids for Egg Yolk Pigmentation. Ph.D. Thesis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Garcia, E.A.; Mendes, A.A.; Pizzolante, C.C.; Gonçalves, H.C.; Oliveira, R.P.; Silva, M.A. Efeito dos níveis de cantaxantina na dieta sobre o desempenho e qualidade dos ovos de poedeiras comerciais. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Avíc. 2002, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira-Moreno, J.; Espíndola, G.B.; Santos, M.S.V.; Freitas, E.R.; Gadelha, A.C.; Silva, F.M.C. Desempenho e qualidade dos ovos de poedeiras comerciais alimentadas com dietas contendo sorgo e páprica em substituição ao milho. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. 2007, 29, 159–163. [Google Scholar]
- Chow, P.Y.; Gue, S.Z.; Leow, S.K.; Goh, L.B. The bioefficacy of microemulsified natural pigments in egg yolk pigmentation. Brit. Poult. Sci. 2014, 55, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moura, A.M.A.; Takata, F.N.; Nascimento, G.R.; Silva, A.F.; Melo, T.V.; Cecon, P.R. Pigmentantes naturais em rações à base de sorgo para codornas japonesas de postura. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2011, 40, 2443–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raddatz-Mota, D.; Pérez-Flores, L.J.; Carrari, F.; Mendoza-Espinoza, J.Á.; León-Sánchez, F.D.; Pinzón-López, L.L.; Godoy-Hernádez, G.; Rivera-Cabrera, F. Achiote (Bixa orellana L.): A natural source of pigment and vitamin. Eur. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 1729–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, C.L.; Andretta, I.; Galli, G.M.; Srefanello, T.B.; Camargo, N.O.T.; Marchiori, M.; Melchior, R.; Kipper, M. Effects of dietary probiotic supplementation on egg quality during storage. Poultry 2022, 1, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valentim, J.K.; Bittencourt, T.M.; Lima, H.J.D.; Moraleco, D.D.; Tossuê, F.J.M.; Silva, N.E.M.; Vaccaro, B.C.; Silva, L.G. Pigmentantes vegetais e sintéticos em dietas de galinhas poedeiras negras. Bol. Ind. Anim. 2019, 79, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faehnrich, B.; Lukas, B.; Humer, E.; Zebeli, Q. Phytogenic pigments in animal nutrition: Potentials and risks. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 1420–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dvořák, P.; Suchy, P.; Straková, E.; Kopriva, V. Possibilities of enhancing the colour of egg yolk. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 853–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhhroojian, N.; Moravej, H.; Shivazad, M. Comparison of marine algae (Spirulina platensis) and synthetic pigment inenhancing egg yolk colour of laying hen. Brit. Poult. Sci. 2011, 52, 548–588. [Google Scholar]
- Sachchidananda, D.; Chowdhury, B.M.H.; Shubash, C.D.; Rashid, M.H.; Abu, J.M.F. Evaluation of marigold flower and orange skin as sources of xanthophyll pigment for the improvement of egg yolk color. J. Poult. Sci. 2008, 45, 265–272. [Google Scholar]
- Drabik, K.; Karwowska, M.; Wengerska, K.; Próchniak, T.; Adamczuk, A.; Batkowska, J. The variability of quality traits of table eggs and eggshell mineral composition depending on hens’ breed and eggshell color. Animals 2021, 11, 1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhen, W.; Shao, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, L.; Pham, V.H.; Abbas, W.; Wan, Z.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Z. Dietary yeast β-glucan supplementation improves eggshell color and fertile eggs hatchability as well as enhances immune functions in breeder laying hens. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 159, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdel-Aal, E.S.M.; Akhtar, H.; Zaheer, K.; Ali, R. Dietary sources of lutein and zeaxanthin carotenoids and their role in eye health. Nutrients 2013, 5, 1169–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rezaei, M.; Zakizadeh, S.; Eila, N. Effects of Pigments Extracted from the Marigold Flower on Egg Quality and Oxidative Stability of the Egg Yolk Lipids in Laying Hens. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2019, 9, 541–547. [Google Scholar]
- Martínez, Y.; Orozco, C.E.; Montellano, R.M.; Valdivié, M.; Parrado, C.A. Use of achiote (Bixa orellana L.) seed powder aspigment of the egg yolk of laying hens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2021, 30, 100154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Natural Pigments | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Paprika | Marigold | (P/M) Mixture | |
Ingredients | 0% | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.8% |
Corn | 56.291 | 56.291 | 56.291 | 56.291 |
Soybean meal 45% | 30.707 | 30.707 | 30.707 | 30.707 |
Inert | 1.069 | 0.989 | 0.989 | 0.989 |
Paprika | 0.0 | 0.08 | 0.0 | 0.04 |
Marigold | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.08 | 0.04 |
Soybean oil | 2.674 | 2.674 | 2.674 | 2.674 |
Limestone | 6.95 | 6.95 | 6.95 | 6.95 |
Dicalcium phosphate | 1.026 | 1.026 | 1.026 | 1.026 |
Salt | 0.343 | 0.343 | 0.343 | 0.343 |
DL-methionine 98% | 0.417 | 0.417 | 0.417 | 0.417 |
L-lysine HCL 76% | 0.323 | 0.323 | 0.323 | 0.323 |
1 Vitamin premix | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
2 Mineral premix | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Nutritional Composition Calculated | ||||
ME (Kcal/Kg) | 2800.00 | 2800.00 | 2800.00 | 2800.00 |
Crude protein (%) | 18.920 | 18.920 | 18.920 | 18.920 |
Digestible lysine (%) | 1.1490 | 1.1490 | 1.1490 | 1.1490 |
Methionine + Cyst (%) | 0.9421 | 0.9421 | 0.9421 | 0.9421 |
Digestible tryptophan (%) | 0.186 | 0.186 | 0.186 | 0.186 |
Digestible threonine (%) | 0.733 | 0.733 | 0.733 | 0.733 |
Calcium (%) | 2.990 | 2.990 | 2.990 | 2.990 |
Available phosphorus (%) | 0.282 | 0.282 | 0.282 | 0.282 |
Sodium (%) | 0.147 | 0.147 | 0.147 | 0.147 |
Variables | Natural Pigment Sources | SEM | p-Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Paprika | Marigold | (P/M) Mixture | |||
Feed intake g/hen/day | 25.85 | 25.51 | 25.79 | 25.74 | 0.479 | 0.96 |
Egg production (%) | 95.07 | 92.38 | 92.5 | 94.22 | 1.275 | 0.35 |
Commercial egg production (%) | 96.73 | 95.04 | 95.4 | 96.29 | 1.173 | 0.71 |
Feed conversion by dozen | 3.32 | 3.16 | 3.19 | 3.12 | 0.260 | 0.19 |
Egg mass (g) | 9.25 | 9.49 | 9.41 | 9.5 | 0.171 | 0.150 |
Feed conversion by mass (kg/kg) | 2.48 b | 2.69 a | 2.75 a | 2.71 a | 0.065 | 0.013 |
Variables | Pigment Additive | SEM | p-Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Paprika | Marigold | (P/M) Mixture | |||
Egg weight (g) | 11.215 a | 10.259 b | 10.164 b | 10.091 b | 0.079 | <0.0001 |
Yolk weight (g) | 3.637 | 3.62 | 3.68 | 3.554 | 0.034 | 0.6219 |
Shell weight (g) | 0.904 a | 0.792 b | 0.788 b | 0.779 b | 0.01 | <0.0001 |
Albumen weight (g) | 6.642 a | 5.789 b | 5.695 | 5.757 b | 0.085 | <0.0001 |
Specific gravity | 1.072 | 1.066 | 1.066 | 1.078 | 0.003 | 0.4373 |
Color fan | 4.687 c | 10.791 a | 8.978 b | 10.875 a | 0.223 | <0.0001 |
Albumen height (mm) | 4.196 | 4.433 | 4.558 | 4.435 | 0.06 | 0.1951 |
Yolk height (mm) | 10.56 | 10.474 | 10.426 | 10.309 | 0.057 | 0.4843 |
Yolk diameter (mm) | 23.609 | 24.326 | 23.877 | 23.8 | 0.117 | 0.1735 |
Haugh unit | 87.863 b | 89.957 ab | 90.829 a | 90.105 ab | 0.342 | 0.0142 |
Yolk index | 0.449 | 0.442 | 0.483 | 0.426 | 0.003 | 0.0959 |
% yolk | 32.952 c | 36.355 b | 36.683 a | 35.337 ab | 0.492 | 0.0306 |
% albumen | 58.964 | 56.968 | 55.764 | 56.83 | 0.419 | 0.0527 |
% shell | 8.083 | 7.832 | 7.897 | 7.829 | 0.121 | 0.8701 |
L | 54.047 b | 55.826 a | 55.424 a | 55.417 a | 0.184 | 0.0033 |
a* | 2.224 d | 6.663 b | 4.232 c | 8.285 a | 0.321 | <0.0001 |
b* | 35.441 c | 37.201 b | 42.119 a | 38.882 ab | 0.590 | 0.0005 |
Storage | Pigment Additive | SEM | p-Value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7 | 14 | Treat | Temp | T*T | |||
Egg weight (g) | Control | 11.21 | 10.45 | 10.47 | 0.040 | <0.0001 | 0.8099 | 0.5482 |
Marigold | 10.16 | 10.27 | 10.47 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 10.09 | 10.28 | 10.11 | |||||
Paprika | 10.25 | 10.48 | 10.50 | |||||
Yolk weight (g) | Control | 3.66 | 3.60 | 3.82 | 0.023 | 0.1388 | <0.0001 | 0.1586 |
Marigold | 3.68 | 3.37 | 4.01 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 3.55 | 3.45 | 3.72 | |||||
Paprika | 3.70 | 3.49 | 3.86 | |||||
Albumen weight (g) | Control | 6.64 | 5.89 | 5.73 | 0.042 | 0.0112 | <0.0001 | 0.0006 |
Marigold | 5.69 | 6.11 | 5.58 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 5.75 | 6.03 | 5.39 | |||||
Paprika | 5.78 | 6.11 | 5.61 | |||||
Shell weight (g) | Control | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.005 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Marigold | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.89 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.90 | |||||
Paprika | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.92 | |||||
Specific gravity | Control | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.002 | 0.1453 | 0.2074 | 0.7186 |
Marigold | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.07 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.07 | |||||
Paprika | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.07 | |||||
% yolk | Control | 32.95 | 34.97 | 47.09 | 0.622 | 0.939 | <0.0001 | 0.2326 |
Marigold | 36.33 | 33.22 | 46.07 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 35.33 | 33.71 | 45.55 | |||||
Paprika | 35.21 | 33.72 | 45.51 | |||||
% albumen | Control | 58.96 | 57.10 | 45.33 | 0.597 | 0.966 | <0.0001 | 0.3062 |
Marigold | 55.76 | 59.08 | 45.21 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 56.83 | 58.53 | 45.83 | |||||
Paprika | 56.96 | 58.50 | 45.65 | |||||
% shell | Control | 8.08 | 8.46 | 8.64 | 0.095 | 0.0939 | <0.0001 | 0.0649 |
Marigold | 7.79 | 7.68 | 8.71 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 7.89 | 7.74 | 8.88 | |||||
Paprika | 7.82 | 7.76 | 8.92 | |||||
Shell thickness (mm) | Control | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.002 | 0.117 | 0.9053 | 0.1799 |
Marigold | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.21 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.21 | |||||
Paprika | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.21 | |||||
Albumen height (mm) | Control | 4.19 | 3.13 | 2.57 | 0.061 | 0.0603 | <0.0001 | 0.4917 |
Marigold | 4.55 | 3.12 | 2.67 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 4.43 | 3.10 | 2.68 | |||||
Paprika | 4.43 | 3.40 | 2.77 | |||||
Yolk height (mm) | Control | 10.56 | 8.54 | 7.02 | 0.690 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Marigold | 10.42 | 7.66 | 5.66 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 10.47 | 7.70 | 5.79 | |||||
Paprika | 10.30 | 7.96 | 5.63 | |||||
Yolk diameter (mm) | Control | 23.60 | 26.39 | 30.55 | 0.178 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0006 |
Marigold | 23.87 | 27.92 | 33.50 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 23.80 | 27.62 | 33.03 | |||||
Paprika | 24.32 | 27.77 | 33.46 | |||||
Haugh unit | Control | 87.86 | 82.19 | 78.34 | 0.392 | 0.015 | <0.0001 | 0.2949 |
Marigold | 90.82 | 82.22 | 79.07 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 90.11 | 82.07 | 79.31 | |||||
Paprika | 89.95 | 83.89 | 79.80 | |||||
Yolk index | Control | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.22 | 0.003 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0006 |
Marigold | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.17 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 0.44 | 0.28 | 0.18 | |||||
Paprika | 0.42 | 0.29 | 0.17 | |||||
L | Control | 55.82 | 65.14 | 61.28 | 0.280 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Marigold | 55.42 | 57.57 | 55.94 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 54.04 | 55.56 | 56.51 | |||||
Paprika | 55.41 | 56.29 | 56.79 | |||||
a | Control | −2.22 | −2.84 | −2.77 | 0.212 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Marigold | 2.22 | 3.54 | 8.11 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 8.28 | 8.17 | 7.31 | |||||
Paprika | 6.66 | 7.00 | 6.74 | |||||
b | Control | 35.44 | 44.99 | 43.89 | 0.513 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Marigold | 42.11 | 49.50 | 49.70 | |||||
(P/M) mixture | 38.88 | 45.36 | 49.30 | |||||
Paprika | 37.20 | 43.26 | 50.84 |
Variable | Effect | p-Value | Equation | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Egg yolk weight (g) | Quad | 0.0004 | y = 0.00555x2 − 0.06343x + 3.65231 | 0.1713 |
Shell weight (marigold) | Quad | 0.0027 | y = 0.00123x2 − 0.01060x + 0.796689 | 0.1627 |
Shell weight (P/M) mixture | Quad | 0.0056 | y = 0.00106x2 − 0.00660x + 0.78921 | 0.2102 |
Shell weight (paprika) | Quad | 0.0094 | y = 0.00109x2 − 0.00549x + 0.79282 | 0.2254 |
Albumen weight (control) | Lin | <0.0001 | y = −0.06493x + 6.54404 | 0.1250 |
Albumen weight (marigold) | Quad | 0.005 | y = −0.00974x2 + 0.12849x + 5.69512 | 0.0567 |
Albumen weight (P/M) mixture | Quad | 0.0023 | y = −0.00944x2 + 0.10598x + 5.75765 | 0.0910 |
Albumen weight (paprika) | Quad | 0.0374 | y = −0.000841x2 + 0.10521x + 5.78906 | 0.0344 |
Albumen height | Quad | <0.0001 | y = 0.00710x2 − 0.22286x + 4.40604 | 0.4864 |
Yolk height (control) | Lin | <0.0001 | y = −0.25257x + 10.47744 | 0.7207 |
Yolk height (marigold) | Quad | 0.0063 | y = 0.00766x2 − 0.44751x + 10.42604 | 0.8693 |
Yolk height (P/M) mixture | Quad | 0.0018 | y = 0.00879x2 − 45723x + 10.47396 | 0.8656 |
Yolk height (paprika) | Lin | <0.0001 | y = −0.33420x + 10.30687 | 0.8311 |
Yolk diameter (control) | Lin | <0.0001 | y = 0.49634x + 23.38139 | 0.6179 |
Yolk diameter (marigold) | Quad | 0.0464 | y = 0.01577x2 + 0.46723x + 23.87729 | 0.7710 |
Yolk diameter (P/M) mixture | Quad | 0.0399 | y = 0.01621x2 + 0.43286x + 23.800 | 0.7577 |
Yolk diameter (paprika) | Quad | 0.0016 | y = 0.02284x2 + 0.33311x + 24.32646 | 0.7901 |
Haugh unit | Quad | <0.0001 | y = 0.03704x2 − 1.27246x + 89.68903 | 0.4627 |
Index yolk (control) | Lin | <0.0001 | y = −0.01609x + 0.44612 | 0.7889 |
Index yolk (marigold) | Quad | <0.0001 | y = 0.00056675x2 − 0.02709x + 0.43831 | 0.9085 |
Index yolk (P/M) mixture | Quad | <0.0001 | y = 0.00059524x2 − 0.02729x + 0.44225 | 0.8971 |
Index yolk (paprika) | Lin | <0.0001 | y = −0.01835x + 0.42280 | 0.8723 |
% yolk | Quad | <0.0001 | y = 0.13457x2 − 1.09161x + 34.95879 | 0.3481 |
% albumen | Quad | <0.0001 | y = −0.14272x2 + 1.16782x + 57.132 | 0.4110 |
% shell | Quad | <0.0001 | y = 0.00889x2 − 0.06068x + 7.90059 | 0.1167 |
L (control) | Quad | <0.0001 | y = −0.13452x2 + 2.27329x + 55.82667 | 0.3500 |
L (marigold) | Quad | 0.0003 | y = −0.03864x2 + 0.57836x + 55.42437 | 0.0960 |
L (P/M) mixture | Lin | <0.0001 | y = 0.17653x + 54.14128 | 0.1697 |
L (paprika) | Lin | <0.0001 | y = 0.09851x + 55.48014 | 0.0657 |
a (control) | Lin | <0.0001 | y = −0.03894x − 2.34003 | 0.0365 |
a (marigold) | Quad | 0.0003 | y = 0.03319x2 − 0.04495x + 2.23271 | 0.4743 |
b (control) | Quad | <0.0001 | y = −0.010878x2 + 2.12662x + 35.444146 | 0.4206 |
b (marigold) | Quad | 0.0068 | y = −0.07334x2 + 1.56921x + 42.11187 | 0.1887 |
b (P/M) mixture | Lin | <0.0001 | y = −0.02585x2 + 1.10641x + 38.88229 | 0.3437 |
b (paprika) | Lin | <0.0001 | y = 0.01549x2 + 0.75789x + 37.20188 | 0.4745 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Valentim, J.K.; de Almeida, A.A.; Serpa, F.C.; de Castro Burbarelli, M.F.; Felix, G.A.; Gomes, K.M.; Ouros, C.C.d.; Caldara, F.R.; Martelli, S.M.; Komiyama, C.M.; et al. Improvement in the Coloration and Quality of Japanese Quail Eggs Through Supplementation with Natural Pigments. Poultry 2025, 4, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4020025
Valentim JK, de Almeida AA, Serpa FC, de Castro Burbarelli MF, Felix GA, Gomes KM, Ouros CCd, Caldara FR, Martelli SM, Komiyama CM, et al. Improvement in the Coloration and Quality of Japanese Quail Eggs Through Supplementation with Natural Pigments. Poultry. 2025; 4(2):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4020025
Chicago/Turabian StyleValentim, Jean Kaique, Alexander Alexandre de Almeida, Felipe Cardoso Serpa, Maria Fernanda de Castro Burbarelli, Gisele Aparecida Felix, Kaique Moreira Gomes, Caio Cesar dos Ouros, Fabiana Ribeiro Caldara, Sílvia Maria Martelli, Claudia Marie Komiyama, and et al. 2025. "Improvement in the Coloration and Quality of Japanese Quail Eggs Through Supplementation with Natural Pigments" Poultry 4, no. 2: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4020025
APA StyleValentim, J. K., de Almeida, A. A., Serpa, F. C., de Castro Burbarelli, M. F., Felix, G. A., Gomes, K. M., Ouros, C. C. d., Caldara, F. R., Martelli, S. M., Komiyama, C. M., & Garcia, R. G. (2025). Improvement in the Coloration and Quality of Japanese Quail Eggs Through Supplementation with Natural Pigments. Poultry, 4(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/poultry4020025